Thanks for uploading Image:Marcha-icm-2005.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson00:51, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks Thuresson for your advice. I took the picture, soy I decided to add the {{GFDL-self}} tag, to realese it under the GDFL conditions. I did this only by adding only the GDFL tag in the "edit" mode page: Is that ok? It's enough?. Kind regards. Pepe Robles
Hi, thanks for uploading this image. If you check the original photo at en:Image:Mount Washington Hotel.jpg, you'll see that the original photo is five times larger. Please always make sure that you upload the fullsized photo and not a smaller version. Regards, Thuresson02:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, can somebody verify that this photo is licensed under GFDL. You claim that the photographer is anonymous but the web site you took it from claims to own the copyright. You also claim that the photographer is anonymous. Which steps have you taken to find the name? Thuresson10:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK Thuresson. I didn`t realize the copyright sign. I'm very good friend of the foundation, and can talk with them to realese the picture. But I don`t think thats neccesary, because I have other pictures about the same theme. So Thuresson, sorry again and thanks for paying so much atention. --Roblespepe18:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the information provided on my talk page. Unfortunately photos taken of copyrighted art is not covered by the 25 years rule. --ALE!13:42, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Lockheed L-188 Electra - Marina Argentina 1981.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
Thanks for uploading Image:N30-TurtlesTeamsters-MEngler-wwwdemocracyuprisingcom.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE!11:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:N30-wwwinfoshporg-capt world trade protest ipa.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE!11:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:N30-wwwinfoshporg-capt world trade protest e8y.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE!11:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Pampillón.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE!11:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Cartel-universitario.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE!11:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Cordobazo3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE!12:01, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Montoneros-sello.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE!12:03, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:17 de octubre-en la fuente.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE!12:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Abuelas.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE!12:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Fora.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE!12:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Fokker - F28 - Armada Argentina - Aeroparque.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk04:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Juan Peron con banda de presidente.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Martin Rizzo23:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Junta Militar Argentina 1976.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Martin Rizzo23:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:José Alfredo Martinez de Hoz.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Martin Rizzo23:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Quema de libros -circa 1978.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Martin Rizzo23:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Pampero.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Martin Rizzo00:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Raul Alfonsin circa 1974.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Martin Rizzo02:17, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Raúl Alfonsín 1971.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Martin Rizzo02:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Ernesto Sábato circa 1972.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Martin Rizzo02:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:José Alfredo Martinez de Hoz.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Martin Rizzo02:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Descripción de las fotografías con licencia PD-AR-Photo.[edit]
Por favor, necesitamos la fecha y fuente de una publicación mayor a 20 años para todas las fotografías que han sido subidas bajo esta licencia, la ley hace referencia a la fecha de publicación por lo tanto no alcanza con justificar que la foto es antigua. Gracias... --Martin Rizzo13:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Juan Peron con banda de presidente.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson09:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Si claro, son fotos del Archivo Grafico de la Nación. De ahí las toman todos. Si quieres puedo darte varios sitios en donde también estén publicadas. --Roblespepe14:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Cuban National Bank is the one who has the copyright of the bills printed by it. But those from 1960 are out of the Berne Convention because Cuba sign it from 1997 on. So the images and designs are in the public domain. Regards --Roblespepe00:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That image isn't a currency bill at all, but a photograph apparently of Simone de Beauvoir, Jean Paul Sartre, and Ernesto Che Guevara... AnonMoos18:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ohhhh sorry. :-) It's my mistake. I used the former information as template and forget to change it. Tanks for been insistent. Happy New Year. --Roblespepe18:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Pedrafurada-11000adp.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
Image:Jorge López - Recompensa.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
The image is clearly a screenshot from a TV. What program? You should know, you ulpoaded the image.
One more point: Did you never wonder why you get so many deletion requests and missing source tags on your talk page? --ALE! ¿…?14:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:576px-Anthraxnote2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH19:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading Image:Sudamérica Siglo XVI con frontera india al sur.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE! ¿…?13:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:America del Sur - Siglos XVI-XVII.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE! ¿…?13:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading Image:Memorándum Embajada USA del 07AG-1979-Contreras.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE! ¿…?13:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:CGT 1981 San Cayetano Mariposa.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
tumbAle, ví que pusiste un cartel de borrar rápido en esta foto. Creo que hay un error, porque se trata del escudo argentino, usado por la CGT en una marcha de 1981. No es un logo de la CGT. ¿No?--Roblespepe14:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Te ruego que reconsideres tu voto. El permiso no es válido porque:
Lo dio el webmaster, que no es el dueño de los derechos de autor. Es como si el permiso para copiar un DVD lo diese el dueño de la tienda donde lo venden.
Se da permiso para "uso público", que en modo alguno es lo mismo que "uso libre". Tampoco se menciona licencia concreta alguna.
No menciona expresamente el derecho a hacer obras derivadas ni usar las imágenes comercialmente. Y en esto del copyright, lo que no se permite expresamente está prohibido.
El webmaster NO ES EL DUEÑO DE LOS DERECHOS ni el legítimo vocero del estado para darlos.
"Uso público" != "uso libre". Por más vueltas que le des, no es lo mismo.
¿Por qué me acusas de interpretar el correo cuando tú legitimas suponer que se concedió permiso para algo que no se menciona?
Estos argumentos que me das son muy peligrosos y, si examinas la votación, verás que no soy el único que piensa que el permiso es papel mojado. Siempre lo ha sido, y lamentablemente muchos otros están así, porque a las buenas intenciones hay que sumar el rigor que exigen las leyes.
Dado que va a volver a pedirse permiso usando el modelo al efecto, ya veremos si el webmaster se declara dueño de los derechos (asumiendo, pues, la responsabilidad legal) y da permiso expreso para redistribuir, modificar y usar comercialmente el material sin más restricciones que las que imponga la licencia libre de su elección. Entonces sabremos si tus argumentos eran mejores que los míos. Un saludo. --Dodo21:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Si vamos a entrar a calificar, tus "argumentos" son meras especulaciones acerca de qué quería decir el webmaster pero no dijo, qué se le pasó por la cabeza, en qué forma podrían interpretarse unas palabras excesivamente ambiguas, y como aliño unas cuantas citas legales. Lo siento, pero en estas cosas hay que ser claros y ejecutivos, no sirven las medias tintas ni las elucubraciones. Así que no me digas que me niego a participar en bailes de salón. --Dodo07:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dice claramente en el origen de las fotos "Se permite la copia, distribución y uso de los contenidos de Indymedia Argentina, siempre y cuando NO se utilice con fines comerciales". Así que es una licencia -NC, por lo que no se admiten en Commons. Procedo a borrarlas. --Dodo19:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
De cualquier forma, me estabas liando: las fotos tiene licencia CC-BY-SA, pero tú dices "Atribución-CompartirDerivadasIgual 2.5 Argentina", cuando el "Derivadas" no aparece por ningún lado. Y las -ND tampoco nos sirven.
Image:Los Simpson-La Película-Promo.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Esma5.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Ale, podrías decirme si subí correctamente esta imagen. Es la foto de una estatua propiedad del fotógrafo. El permiso está transcripto y también fue enviado a permissions@wikimedia.org. Es la primera vez que lo hago. Saludos, --Roblespepe21:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias por preguntarme. El problema es que el derecho del autor es independiente de la posesión del objeto. Eso quiere decire que vos lamentablemente necesitas el permiso del autor (artista) y no del dueño de la estatua. --ALE! ¿…?12:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Image:Estatua de Anna Chromyi- Pietrasanta(2).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading Image:Provincias_Unidas_de_Sud_América_-1816_(provincias).png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand15:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Looking at the history of deletion of your files. I would say that you should be more careful with copyright and browse through your older images, whether some images still have to be deleted. If so, please use th {{Speedy}} tag. --ALE! ¿…?11:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading Image:Industria_envases_flexibles.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE! ¿…?10:44, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Che_Guevara_bajo_identidad_Adolfo_Mena_González_-_1966.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Polarlys12:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand03:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand12:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Image:Cerati-River-1997-tuguriodetom-277515876.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
I noticed you've uploaded some images and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.
Please give uploaded images meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the image is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename each image with an intuitive name that describes the image itself. Thanks, and happy editing! ALE! ¿…?14:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand18:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Thanks for uploading Image:Bush Sr and Felix Rodriguez in White House c1986.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Abu badali17:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Hi Roblespepe! I uploaded the original version of that photo as a new version without noticing that you wrote that you edited the photo. I thought it was just smaller.. If you think that you version is better feel free to rollback me :-) --Jaqen10:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Billete_20_pesos_-_Cuba_-_1960_-_firmado_por_Che_Guevara.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry on the Requests for Deletion page..
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading Image:GaleríasPacífico-Roux-769718706.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Patstuart (talk) 13:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:423744318 1448f9577f b.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jaqen01:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Juan Lamaglia y Sra - 1970.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Anna23:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Todas las imágenes necesitan una fuente, la página web de donde la sacaste, si es un escaneo, etc. Y, por favor, revisa esta imagen y esta has eliminado mis avisos pero no has corregido el error: la fuente no corresponde con la imagen. Un saludo. Anna00:02, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sí, es necesario poner el método con el que has obtenido la imagen, ya que si la hubieras sacado de una página web deberías citarla como fuente también. Aquí tienes un ejemplo (entre muchos) de la fuente obtenida por escaneo. La imagen de las Galerías Pacífico ya tiene el enlace correcto, pero esta sigue mal, compruébalo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/10512081@N00/234505587/, el enlace es incorrecto y si la imagen que tú has subido ya no existe en Flickr hay que agregar la plantilla adecuada. Un saludo. Anna10:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A ver, en esta página Commons:Primeros pasos/Calidad y descripción, en el apartado "Descripción detallada del archivo" Source enumera algunas de las posibles fuentes que se deben proporcionar, ya sé que no especifica escaneo, pero el etc final da a entender (o debería) que puede haber más. Aunque quizás tampoco estaría de más añadirlo para posibles navegantes. La foto de los cactus ya está bien, de paso he quitado el cartel de falta de fuente y corregido la categoría. Un saludo. Anna22:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Julio de Grazia -1982.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo15:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
When I found here in Commons this image, I find you as the user who uploaded it, but I don't understand the staff (plantilla) that it contains. I would like a little help for licesing photos, for include in my articles. Please, send me a list of staff which I can use for my image and how I could design frames as which the images contains here. Greeting. Please, try answer me in my discussion in Spanish, for I don't dominate perfect English.--Leonpolanco17:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:PatriciaSosa.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo13:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:PatriciaSosa (2).jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo13:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Palermo-Palacio-2006.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo09:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Borré decenas de fotos de fútbol del usuario que eran evidentes copyvios y le dejé un mensaje. Si reincide avisame. Barcex11:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Cosecha-ar-1992-2007.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE! ¿…?11:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Image:Beijing 2008-Regata Laser-2788063503.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
Image:Beijing 2008-Regata Laser-2788063503 (frag).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
Hola. Tengo unas preguntas sobre esta imagen, Image:Peron y Eva - Acto en Plaza de Mayo -17OCT1951.jpg: ¿de dónde la sacaste? ¿Tienes otra versión, de alta calidad? ¿Estás seguro de que viene del Archivo General de la Nación Argentina? Te pregunto por que he estado buscando la imagen allí en el archivo, queriendo una versión de alta calidad, y no la encurentro en ningún lado.
(copiado de la página mia:) A, muchísimas gracias. (No, solo hablé con la gente que trabaja allí en el departamento de documentos fotográficos.) Ahora estoy en Montevideo, y no voy a estar mucho tiempo en Buenos Aires. También me han recomendado intentar en la Fototeca de la Biblioteca Nacional. --Jbmurray (talk) 21:40, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Hi, thank you for this nice source of photos, two questions: Are derivative works allowed? The source does not mention this, but of course free of rights means free of righst so this should be no problem. The selected {{GFDL}} license is not correct, the source does not mention GFDL or anything like this, you should select a correct license tag. --Martin H. (talk) 00:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.
If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.
If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading File:Marcelo_Garrafo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).
Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.
Aparently User:Shizhao blocked me. The only reason giver is: "ou have a long hisstoty of uploading images with the wrong license", so I can't know what is he talking about. Neither he asked me anything. Perhaps if he would, he could avoid mistakes, as the one he made saying that File:Marcelo_Garrafo.jpg has not "provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information", when de license is clearly at the end of the page (where most licenses used to be), a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic. I'd already upload about a thousand valid images. Of course, sometime I can make a mistake. But if 99% of my images are valid, I think that a good administrator could previously asked me first. Well, I hope somebody can correct this.--Roblespepe (talk) 01:47, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unblock request granted
This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.
Request reason: "Aparently User:Shizhao blocked me. The only reason giver is: "ou have a long hisstoty of uploading images with the wrong license", so I can't know what is he talking about. Neither he asked me anything. Perhaps if he would, he could avoid mistakes, as the one he made saying that File:Marcelo_Garrafo.jpg has not "provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information", when de license is clearly at the end of the page (where most licenses used to be), a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic. I'd already upload about a thousand valid images. Of course, sometime I can make a mistake. But if 99% of my images are valid, I think that a good administrator could previously asked me first. Well, I hope somebody can correct this."
As I say before, you can see the GFDL licence (a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic) at the end of the page where of the image's source.--Roblespepe (talk) 02:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
?? I didn't knew that. GFDL is the nearest option given by Wikimedia Commons to upload images "from somewheare else". So I choose de one I thought it was the same. But, assuming I could made a mistake, why the admnistrator didn't told (teach) me? Commons:Blocking policy says that admnistrators have to give "clear explanations", in my own language. Of course if he would said me that, I could correct the mistake. CLearly, a mistake can't be a reason for blocking. I uploaded a thousand of valid images. Is not obvious for you that I'm not a vandal? PS: And in this case is a mistake induced by Wikipedia Commons in the uploading procedure. --Roblespepe (talk) 15:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are not a vandal, but that's not why you were blocked. It's wasn't for a mistake either, it was for many many "mistakes". Just look at all the warnings on your talk page. Anyway, I have asked a Spanish admin to speak with you. Rocket000 (talk) 00:38, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What warnings are you talking about? I have more than 1000 images uploaded, what is your figure to consider "many" mistakes. I think you agree that it's not the same to have 10 mistakes uploading 20 images, that having 10 mistakes uploading 100. What rate had you applied to me? Yo also can't add all mistakes, without consider time. Once more, is not the same to have 10 mistakes in 10 days, or having 10 mistakes in 100 days. You also cannot value in the same way the mistakes of 2006, when I was learning. Did you? In the way you explain it appear that you did. That's not fair. You also have to exclude those warnings that were mistakes of the administrators or were not my mistakes. Did you? In the last 8 warnings I received the last year, no one you can say is only because of me. Did you considered that? And if you did,why then you are now saying that 8 mistakes, uploding 300 images, most of them made by administrators, are "many many" mistakes. Once more, with all respect, it's not fair. I'm not a bad user I'm a very good user. I was never blocked, and I never received an advice of stop doing something considered wrong. Of course I upload a lot of images, but I'm sure this is a good thing for Wikimedia Commons. And of course if you work more, you make more mistakes. But I thought this was to be considered by the administrators. If not what you are saying is: "don't work so much". ???? I'm sure I don't deserved this punishment. If you explain me I can learn. My mistakes of 2006 are not the mistakes of 2008. Because I learned. But now you are adding all my learnings to punished me. Once more, I'm sure, it's not fair. Well, finally, is not really only my problem. We are a team, and if you treat me like if I am vandal, of course the team is going to be damaged. --Roblespepe (talk) 02:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Once more I ask for a Spanish administrator. WC blocking policy ordered that. I think is important also to acomplished WC policies. If you continue using English, of course my possibilities of making me understand, are less. --Roblespepe (talk) 02:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
English: Pepe, calm down. I'm reviewing your unblock request. Please let me review your contributions and uploads and briefly you will have an answer. Español: Pepe, tranquilo. Ya estoy revisando la petición de desbloqueo. Dame tiempo para revisar tus contribuciones y subidas y en breve tendrás una respuesta. KveD (talk) 02:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, I'm going to consider this an honest mistake. Now, It is true that Roblespepe had in the past several warnings about mistaken licenses and copyright issues, for which he received a one week block by ALE!. But if we take a look to his last 500 uploads we will find that only ten (if my counting is correct) images has been deleted:
File:Rally Dakar 2009 32.jpg because Duplicated of or superseded by: File:Rally Dakar 2009 Cristo Redentor cordillera de los Andes.jpg.
I was planning to do the unblock originally, but I thought I'd ask a quick question just to make sure the user knew they had made a mistake. The answer was not satisfactory, so I hesitated and then called on a Spanish speaking admin (you) per the user's request. I have not personally reviewed the user's contribs in depth so I do not have a strong opinion one way or another. For now I'll trust your judgement on it and support the unblock. To Roblespepe: Please remember that Creative Commons and GFDL are not the same thing. Also remember that CC-BY is not the same as CC-BY-SA and that any Creative Commons license with NC or ND in it is not allowed here. I know all these various free licenses can be confusing, but it's very important that we get it right. Good luck. Rocket000 (talk) 03:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To Kved: Thanks Kved. I want to highlight that, from the nine cases, #1, #2 and #7, where not incorrect licences but duplicate valid images; #6 was deleted by my request (not licence problem, but poor quality image); #9 was CC-BY when I uploaded it (and it stills CC-BY); #8 is an administrator mistake because PD-AR-Photo does aplies to all kind of photos including those ones that appear in posters (there is neither law nor sentence saying that). So only three images had wrong licences: #3 (the picture is free in Flickr but an administrator consider that it could be affected by "panorama" issues; y didn´t argue with him and acepted the possibility); #5 (Beijing), was in Flickr as a CC-BY image, but it was tricky because it was part of some copyrighted pictures presented as no copyrighted-it was not my fault; #4 I think was my only really mistake, perhaps a confusion caused by being tired - I didn't realized de "NC". So in my honest opinion, I think I only comitted one mistake, corrected inmediatly, because it was controlled by "flickrreview". I think administrators should talk first with experimented users without background of violations. Thanks again Kved. PS: Please delete this blocking from my record because in the future someone could think that it was a fair blocking. For third time: Thanks Kved.
To Rocket000. Of course I'd learned that :-). But take in consideration this: the administrator didn't put the warning banner because what you are saying now, but because "a source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license". And this afirmation was false, because as you could verified, there was that licence there. He should put the correct licence, or ask myself, not blocked me. Secondly: as I told you, when a user wants to upload an image via "It is from somewhere else", there is not the option "Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic". The nearest option is GFDL. Additionlly, in Wikipedia, is written this: "the Wikimedia Foundation and others had produced a proposal supported by both the FSF and Creative Commons to modify the Free Documentation License in such a fashion as to allow the possibility for the Wikimedia Foundation to migrate the projects to the similar Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC-BY-SA) licence" (see). So I understand that Wikipedia is saying that CC "is similar" to GFDL. If you add all these circumstances I'm sure you are no going to think that I'm a user that has to be blocked. And, dear Rocket000, all this missunderstanding could be avoid if the administrator first talked to me, as it is ordered in the Wikimedia Commons Blocking Policy. Well, after all, thanks for your time, also.--Roblespepe (talk) 04:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I totally agree. Regarding the CC/GFDL thing. Wikimedia (and CC and FSF) all do consider CC-BY-SA very close to GFDL, but not CC-BY. When the upload form doesn't offer the correct license, you need to enter it in manually. I know, not fun, but it would be crazy to include all the possible licenses in that one little drop down menu. (And yes, archive your page ;) Cheers, Rocket000 (talk) 04:23, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pepe, te recomendaría que archivaras tu discusión, ya que la gran cantidad de avisos que has acumulado a través de los años pueden llegar a engañar en un primer golpe de vista y llevar a situaciones como la de hoy. Saludos. KveD (talk) 04:18, 24 April 2009 (UTC)PD: Me cansé de escribir en ingles. =P[reply]
Template:CC-AR-Presidency
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
