User talk:Renamed user 995577823Xyn/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
TUSC token 3472791255cab59fe15d209533a44249
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! We hope (talk) 16:22, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Filemover!
Hi Renamed user 995577823Xyn/Archive 1, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:
- Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
- Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
- Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
--Dereckson (talk) 10:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
copyrighted image
pls help in getting the correct licenses for the images i have uploaded. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:31, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Cher
Hi, I am Kekkomereq4 from Wikipedia Italia. Could you upload this photo of Cher please?--79.32.87.129 16:59, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- I can't do that because it is in a 1982 newspaper and would be a copyright violaton. The photo does not give a source either. It is from after 1978 and would be considered a copyrighted image. Sorry, We hope (talk) 19:16, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
ebay images for you
Robert Walker, Jr: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1965-Robert-Walker-Jr-ROUTE-66-Press-Photo-/150807890783?pt=Art_Photo_Images&hash=item231cd9cb5f
Cheers. George Ho (talk) 06:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
|
File:Walter Koenig Star Trek.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
91.57.81.35 15:53, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
star trek images
I don't know how to revert an image, you have done so, so please do this for File:Leonard Nimoy William Shatner Star Trek 1968.JPG. I hope this person can understand just how disruptive they are, if they are sincerely trying to improve the site.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Machine gun tagging
Tagging discussion= We hope (talk) 20:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- I assume that noting your personal discussion with a third party is not meant to substitute for a reply to the above issues and that you will reply. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 20:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- This was the discussion prior to the tagging and I feel nothing else is necessary to add. We hope (talk) 20:41, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Am I supposed to simply go to ANI, or do you have a better idea to avoid wasting other admin's time? --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 21:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Take it to the admin's board here. We hope (talk) 21:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
COM:AN
--Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 21:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Richard Gautier
You can create a category of Richard Gautier, while I give you this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1975-Actor-Dick-Gautier-Robin-Hood-TV-Show-Press-Photo-/251097935339?_trksid=p5197.m1997&_trkparms=aid%3D222002%26algo%3DSIC.FIT%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D16%26meid%3D410588296817117758%26pid%3D100016%26prg%3D1006%26rk%3D6%26 --George Ho (talk) 07:26, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Conrad Bain
For Conrad Bain (intentionally giving you a red link for you to create), this would do: item, --George Ho (talk) 07:29, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Dawn Wells
Image of her in eBay. --George Ho (talk) 17:29, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Same photo but in different edition: eBay. --George Ho (talk) 17:42, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Bob Denver
One of photos in eBay; well, it says: United Artists Television presentation and Gladasya Productions. --George Ho (talk) 17:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- More: photo 2, photo 3. --George Ho (talk) 17:40, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Alan Hale, Jr.
Here is one of them: eBay. --George Ho (talk) 17:41, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the 
→ Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 04:30, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Done
Please notify uploader of deletion requests
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Capra-young.jpg, I was not notified so was unaware the image was posted for deletion. As you can guess, if I was, I would have commented. It's doubtful that a 1930s image like this one was copyrighted by Sony, despite their boilerplate "we own everything" statements. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 16:52, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- The DR was done with Commons software which notifies the last person who altered the file or transferred it to Commons. notice. This editor either transferred it or altered it. Notice was given. We hope (talk) 17:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Commons Barnstar | |
| I love all the old publicity photos you've been uploading (especially the actresses). INeverCry 00:40, 30 September 2012 (UTC) |
Re: Authorship question
Hi. You posted a question about some files I'd uploaded on Fastily's talk page, and I thought I'd reply here rather than fill his talk page with the discussion. As I stated there, I've been primarily concerned with providing specific dating information, but just at a glance, I know that I can provide additional evidence of authorship for several files, so I'll be happy to go through my upload history and provide additional information where I can. I'd just ask that you give me a few weeks to allow me enough time to go through everything before tagging. I realize you'd mentioned that you'd had some problems with previous editors in the past, but I'm personally not looking for conflict here on Commons, so if you have any questions/concerns regarding something I've uploaded in the future, please don't hesitate to contact me directly and I'll be happy to see what I can do to address the issue. Thanks. --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 04:49, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- I was expecting you to take the advice given and go through the files yourself. There's been problems with photos of this type here for some time. One user in particular appears to upload anything if it holds still long enough and gives it either a PD or a PD-not renewed license. The authors are listed as either "studio" or "news source"; many turn up at Getty or Corbis with active copyrights. When the files are tagged as questionable, the cry of "machine gun tagging" is heard, regardless of who tagged the files, and there's a dispute for almost every DR. More often than not, there's not enough evidence the files are truly in the public domain and they're deleted; sometimes the "debate" continues about whether they should have been deleted. I think you get the picture. :) We hope (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Cher
Hi. User Nick-D posted this on en:Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cher/archive1:
the image licensing in this article is totally unacceptable. I take a fairly non-paranoid attitude towards copyright issues (I think!), but the claim that File:Sonny & Cher Show 1977.JPG is PD because it doesn't have a copyright tag on an ebay listing (posted by an account which gives no indication of being the original creator/owner of the image) seems highly questionable. Ditto File:Sonny and Cher David McCallum Man From Uncle 1967 Cropped.JPG, File:Cher Don Knotts Sonny & Cher Show 1976.JPG, File:Sonny & Cher 1973 Cropped.JPG, File:Sonny and Cher Sonny and Cher Show 1976.JPG, File:Farrah Fawcett Cher 1976.JPG - to sustain a claim that these images were released without any copyright notifications you need verifiable sources which trace directly back to their original owner (eg, if the images were released as part of a press pack which included a written copyright statement I imagine that copyright would still apply. ... File:Sonny and Cher live 1971 Cropped.jpg has a copyright marking on the record company's logo (and Google states that it's 'copyrighted material', for whatever that's worth) so the claim that it was released free of a copyright declaration is questionable.
Is he right? Chercrop (talk) 22:36, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- The mark seen on the Billboard ad is not a "C" in circle, but an "R" in circle for the Kapp logo. The Google markings indicate that the magazine is under copyright, but the ads in it are not, unless they're covered with a copyright mark and notice all their own. There would need to be a copyright notice by Kapp records and there is none on the ad.
- There are no copyright markings as can be seen at the full view link.
- The ad is not covered by any copyrights for Billboard.
- US Copyright Office page 3-magazines are collective works (PDF)
- "A notice for the collective work will not serve as the notice for advertisements inserted on behalf of persons other than the copyright owner of the collective work. These advertisements should each bear a separate notice in the name of the copyright owner of the advertisement."
- The rest of the photos were distributed by the respective networks to news media with no copyright markings on them--they all have an original copy of the front and back of them to prove that, and in some cases, there's a publicity release with the network's logo and information on them.
- United States Copyright Office page 2 "Visually Perceptible Copies The notice for visually perceptible copies should contain all three elements described below. They should appear together or in close proximity on the copies.
- 1 The symbol © (letter C in a circle); the word “Copyright”; or the abbreviation “Copr.”
- 2 The year of first publication. If the work is a derivative work or a compilation incorporating previously published material, the year date of first publication of the derivative work or compilation is sufficient. Examples of derivative works are translations or dramatizations; an example of a compilation is an anthology. The year may be omitted when a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work, with accompanying textual matter, if any, is reproduced in or on greeting cards, postcards, stationery, jewelry, dolls, toys, or useful articles.
- 3 The name of the copyright owner, an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally known alternative designation of owner.1 Example © 2007 Jane Doe.")
- The photos and the ad were published before 1977 and prior to 1978, they had to be marked with copyright notations. This file File:MASH TV cast 1974.JPG was issued by CBS with no copyright marks--front and back of the photo is seen with the CBS tags; it's in a featured article. The same is true with this one File:MASH TV Cast 1972.jpg, in a featured list. They're both licensed the same as the photo files you're asking about. We hope (talk) 23:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ok. Can I transcribe it to en:Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cher/archive1? Nick-D is oppose to the FAC because he thinks your image licesing is questionable. Chercrop (talk) 23:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- You can link it to the discussion if you want link to this conversation. We hope (talk) 23:25, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ok. Can I transcribe it to en:Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cher/archive1? Nick-D is oppose to the FAC because he thinks your image licesing is questionable. Chercrop (talk) 23:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
The film itself is still copyrighted per registration no. RE0000163961 (copyright.gov). I wonder if you can still treat it as separate photo. --George Ho (talk) 06:42, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Reply at your talk page. We hope (talk) 06:56, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Burgess Meredith
One about Twilight Zone: [1]. --George Ho (talk) 11:48, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
This photo may still be copyrighted; other copies may bear copyright notice. Another photo is an example. --George Ho (talk) 11:47, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- The Joker photo in your link is copyrighted by National Periodical Publications--books and comics. The one we have here is from Greenway Productions. They were the producers of the television series and at least the first film. We hope (talk) 15:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- However, here's the press release of The Sound of Music. It might omit the copyright notice, but notice the same font used by 20th Century Fox. --George Ho (talk) 16:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Fonts can be used by anyone-that has no bearing on copyright. The Joker photo at the link is a different pose and copyrighted by National Periodical Publications. The photo here has no copyright marks, is a different pose and was done by the producers of the series and the film-Greenway Productions. If fonts and so on were under copyright, we wouldn't have so many logos that fail the copyright originality test. We hope (talk) 16:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
ABC Press release of Eileen Herlie
This textual material omits copyright notice: [2]. I asked the seller about this image. The seller said that its back page is blank and that there is only one page. Thoughts? --George Ho (talk) 23:09, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- Is it all right to upload this? Or convert it into text in Wikisource? --George Ho (talk) 02:31, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
It's closed as "kept", but I wonder if that's the right decision. --George Ho (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
|
Category:Dr.Kildare has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Dobie80 (talk) 06:22, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Discussion highly-relevant to your activities
Go to en:Template talk:PD-US-no notice... -- AnonMoos (talk) 16:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
|
|
File:Cream Clapton Bruce Baker 1960s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
151.226.219.238 12:00, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 |
File:Maurice Rocco 1944.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Caffeyw (talk) 02:59, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
|
File:Maurice Rocco 1945.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Caffeyw (talk) 03:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
|
File:Phyllis Avery and George Gobel 1950s.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Caffeyw (talk) 04:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletions
Hi! We are aware of the user tagging to incorrectly. Sorry for the extra work. We all try to keep one or two eyes on the tags. The user picked very tricky images. Given the short time of working here, I like to assume good faith. ---Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
The Detectives Starring Robert Taylor
Hi. Do you know of any other "free use photos" for The Detectives Starring Robert Taylor? Perhaps one with an original cast photo? The one being used for that article now is not representative of the series at all...especially since Adam West wasn't even an original cast member,wasn't the series star, and didn't even join the series until the final season. Any help you can give would be really appreciated . Thanks !! 76.212.161.90 17:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- File:Ursula Thiess Robert Taylor The Detectives 1960.JPG Right now, this is all we have without Adam West. I can try looking for others and upload them if I do find them. We hope (talk) 17:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi We hope. Thank you for uploading the back of the photo. I didn't think of copying that file (the history of the file page was copied so..). 
Trijnsteltalk 19:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Oona O'Neil photo question
Would this photo of Oona O'Neil be PD? --Light show (talk) 08:35, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Replied at your talk page. We hope (talk) 13:06, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
|
|
File:Andy Griffith Lee Meriwether 1971.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Davidwr (talk) 21:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Carly Simon image
Based on the rationale for tagging and deleting another Carly Simon photo, that it lacked a scan of the reverse side, can you alert me to any new problems if I now have the actual photo and can scan both sides?
Related to the only other photo of her which I noticed was also just deleted, I don't remember whether it stated that a copyright search was done. Do you have access to the original description to check. In any case, since it needed to be registered within five years, and takes only a few seconds to find out, wouldn't it have been easier to search the copyright instead of doing all the other searching for the same images all over the web? Anyway, I just searched for any photos of her registered since 1978 and the closest photo was for Carly Simonize by a car parts company. Is that enough to request undeletion? --Light show (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- It was tagged because the problem is accuracy in dating and license choice. If the back has no dating on it, you have to be able to establish when it was published. You can research magazines like Billboard, which is online at Google Books, and link to it but there are some issues missing from their collection, and their search went from great to miserable in the last few months or so.
- Only admins can see the files and their former details. You're welcome to go to undeletions and make the request. We hope (talk) 20:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. But as the same issue of "publication" was discussed for another publicity photo which you uploaded, and since the Carly Simon photos were published by her recording company, why is it also necessary to prove some magazine printed it? --Light show (talk) 20:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- The idea is to get an exact time frame for when it was published, not the idea of publication itself. We hope (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. But as the same issue of "publication" was discussed for another publicity photo which you uploaded, and since the Carly Simon photos were published by her recording company, why is it also necessary to prove some magazine printed it? --Light show (talk) 20:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Reverse sides of multiple images
As you know, a number of image files, such as File:Richard Belzer.jpg, have been tagged for deletion because they did not show the reverse side. I now have a number original photos, including that one, most of which are blank on the back. I'd like your suggestion on how to prove future uploads are blank. I can simply state it, scan it, or hold it up to a mirror so both sides can be seen. Any other ideas? --Light show (talk) 04:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- When the back has been blank, I've used the scan of it and other means, like research, to determine time frame, etc. We hope (talk) 14:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
NBC categories
I noticed that you were removing NBC categories from television program images. Some of Category:NBC logos I understood, but some of the removals from Category:NBC like File:Father knows best 1957.JPG and File:My friend flicka 1957.JPG, I don't understand. These are NBC postcards that advertising shows whose original network was NBC. Why would they not be in Category:NBC? --Closeapple (talk) 04:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward
I answered your concern regarding the copyright of the picture.--GDuwenTell me! 17:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Your images cross-wiki
I spread this pic of Joanna Pettet to all her articles on other wikis. I've been doing this for quite a while with tennis players, singers, writers, and modern actors, but these uploads of yours are worth the work too. I'll have to look thru your other stuff and see how many more I can spread around. INeverCry 00:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
These appear to be from the same photo-shoot; I bet they weren't taken four years apart... AnonMoos (talk) 04:09, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds good, thanks... AnonMoos (talk) 00:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
ArchiveBot
Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:44, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
|
|
File:Jim Morrison 1969.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
82.171.101.97 13:55, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Nice washing of Mala Powers 1955.jpg ;)
• Jaybear • ...disc. • 21:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you but all I did was to find an unwatermarked copy of this. :) Sometimes those who think watermarks stop copying leave a door open to an unwatermarked copy of the photo; all I did was find it and use it. ;) We hope (talk) 22:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
MLK 1958 Arrest
Greetings, We hope! What a nice coincidence that you have uploaded this MLK photo just as I am doing some research that relates to it directly. The photo was taken by photographer Charles Moore, who was then working for the Montgomery Advertiser. Sometimes the photo is credited to "Charles Moore / Black Star" -- Black Star being a photo agency which distributed Moore's work starting in 1962. As far as I can tell, Moore retained the copyright on these photos -- see here for example -- and seemingly never renewed them. (If Black Star ever owned or co-owned the rights, they also did not renew.) The foregoing evidence supports the notion this famous photograph is officially part of the public domain, and suggests that a number of other significant images -- such as this one from the integration of the University of Mississippi -- are fair game for all to use. Monumenteer2014 (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
|
|
File:James Arness Gunsmoke 1956.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.134.64.209 09:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Deletion request
Would you have a moment to look at this deletion request? You seem to have some expertise regarding the copyright status of this photographer. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio
Can you take a look at File:Outsiders TV Preview Commercial.jpg and tell me if it's a copyvio? The uploader's other image was a blatant one, but this is in use, and I don't know much about TV stills. Thanks for your time. INeverCry 08:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
That image is truly, truly bizarre! AnonMoos (talk) 16:44, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- When I was a little kid, my dad had an old watch with a radium dial (probably originally my grandfather's), but he knew all about the radium dial painters, and never wore the watch. AnonMoos (talk) 03:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Happy New Year Renamed user 995577823Xyn!
Renamed user 995577823Xyn,
Have a great 2015, and thanks for your contributions to Commons! INeverCry 21:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
|
File:Little Jimmy Dickens 1971.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Neatnik (talk) 22:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Quack?
Have a look at this guy, and especially James Garner; the redlinks are single image galleries created twice each by this user with a very suspicious name. 1000+ edits on en.wiki though... INeverCry 23:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Message moved from your userpage
I would like to know why the image on the MANJAM wiki page has be flagged for deletion.
As the graphic designer and owner of the trademark MANJAM, I, along with the other director of Hubjet LLC Georgios Filippakos have owned the rights to the trademark since May 2012. Please see confirmation of this below:
http://www.trademarkia.com/manjam-85635698.html
With respect to the rights for the images used in the graphic, the use online has been paid for and granted via Getty Images. If you require evidence of this I can forward you the invoices related to the rights acquisition.
I trust this evidence helps you with your editing process. Please confirm that this is in accordance with Wikipedia's terms and conditions.
yours sincerely Grant Mitchell Munro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hubjet (talk • contribs) 08:03, January 15, 2015 (UTC)
I'm looking for photos of Zephyrettes
We hope,
First of all, thanks so much for the photos of California Zephyr interiors featuring Zephyrettes that you've uploaded over the past couple years (exhibit A and exhibit B). I greatly appreciate both of them.
I'm currently working on a Zephyrette article in my sandbox, and I'm looking for more photos to illustrate it. I know that you do amazing work finding and uploading public domain materials, including plenty related to railroads, so I'm curious if you'd be able to find a few of Zephyrettes or pass along a few tips and tricks about how you do so.
Thanks again, and take care!
Michael Barera (talk) 04:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
PS: Do you think it would be possible to extract something useful from images like this or like this? And what is the best way for checking if copyright has been renewed or not? Michael Barera (talk) 15:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Josh Rumage
He's still around. Have a look at this. INeverCry 03:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
About images in Spanish Wikipedia article about Rock in Spain
Hello, Mr. We hope. All the pictures uploaded in the article Rock en España (in spanish Wikipedia) are Public Domain. According to the Spanish Copyright Law, a mere picture (non-artistic image, as a concert or a snapshot) is public domain after 25 years of its creation. Article 128. Title V. Law from April 12 1996. All the images I uploaded are Spanish and they have been taken before 1990, therefore, they are Public Domain. I'd written the text (in spanish) of the Spanish Copyright Law. I repeat it:
Dominio público según la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual española 1/96 de 12 de abril. Título V, artículo 128 "De las meras fotografías"
Texto artículo 128, Título V de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual Española:
"Protección de las meras fotografías:
Artículo 128. De las meras fotografías
Quien realice una fotografía u otra reproducción obtenida por procedimiento análogo a aquélla, cuando ni una ni otra tengan el carácter de obras protegidas en el Libro I, goza del derecho exclusivo de autorizar su reproducción, distribución y comunicación pública, en los mismos términos reconocidos en la presente Ley a los autores de obras fotográficas.
Este derecho tendrá una duración de veinticinco años computados desde el día 1 de enero del año siguiente a la fecha de realización de la fotografía o reproducción.
Estas fotografías no forman parte de un trabajo artístico, art-book, reportaje o elemento de diseño, tienen más de 25 años y son, por lo tanto, de dominio público.
I repeat: The Spanish Law says that all that pictures don't need permission because all of they are more of 25 years old and are Public Domain ( http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2014/11/05/pdfs/BOE-A-2014-11404.pdf and https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-1996-8930 ). The Spanish Law text is the own persmission. In fact, I can't upload pictures for the following sections in article (Spanish Rock in 90's, 2000's, etc) because the law doesn't allow me (the possible pictures of the bands of this era are shot after 1990, so they aren't older than 25). And I respect the law and the rules of Wikimedia Commons. But, I insist: Every picture I've uploaed in the article till now are shot before 1990).
Thanks a lot and greetings from Spain.--Stephen Strange (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Shadow of the Thin Man.jpg
Sorry if I caused you any extra work by moving this file over to Commons the way I did. There's a lot more involved than I knew. Bede735 (talk) 23:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
That gallery you mentioned...
It gets worse, there were a pile of images in a subcategory, so I have merged all 241 into this category. I have also nominated a few more and speedied a couple today. I'm thinking about the promotional/self-promotional nature of all these unused uploads as well as the obvious culling from multiple sources as a pattern. But all in good time, Commons wasn't built in a day. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Greetings: In reviewing the images that you mentioned to me the other day, I noticed on the Revision history of "File:Ruby yadav 2014-04-15 08-48.jpg" that OTRS permission was received on the image. Considering the various cameras and styles of the remaining pictures and their presence on (c) website, I'm not 100% certain about anything with this situation anymore. I have replied to the apparent user on my talk page and I'm down with a terrible cold, so if you could keep an eye on that for me for a couple of days I'd be most grateful. I set all the file names in question to a link list to make it a bit easier. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- User:Ellin Beltz When we started questioning these photos, there was nothing in the way of permission noted on any of them, so it may be a start. ;) Will keep an eye on things and hope you feel better SOON! :) We hope (talk) 14:02, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the other upload on File:Webb Pierce.jpg - I hesitated whether I had to do that, so I'm thankful you did it. :-) Trijnsteltalk 20:47, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Laurence Olivier Merle Oberon Wuthering Heights.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:05, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
An award for you!
.jpg)
|
The Zephyrette Award |
| Thanks again for all your help with finding, licensing, and uploading Zephyrette images a couple of weeks ago. One derivative photo (pictured) is actually on the English Wikipedia main page right now as the DYK image. Thanks again for all your help! Michael Barera (talk) 03:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
File:Dudley Moore Beyond the Fringe 1962.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
65.88.88.162 22:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Postcard dating helps
|
This user is, of their own volition, no longer active on Wikimedia Commons.
This is not indicative of breaking any Wikimedia policies. |
when you no longer have a chance to say anything before something's deleted, it's time to go. We hope (talk) 00:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Doors electra publicity photo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
