User talk:Paris 16/01

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Édouard Manet - Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Édouard Manet - Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Boulevard du Temple by Daguerre.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boulevard du Temple by Daguerre.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fishing 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fishing 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:PapuaNewGuineanandson.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PapuaNewGuineanandson.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ParisCafeDiscussion.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ParisCafeDiscussion.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bibliotheque-musee-Guimet.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bibliotheque-musee-Guimet.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Plan de Paris en 1657.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plan de Paris en 1657.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sortie de l'opéra en l'an 2000-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sortie de l'opéra en l'an 2000-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:A sculpture at the entrance to the palace of Versailles.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A sculpture at the entrance to the palace of Versailles.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fête de la Concorde, arrivée des corporations au Champ-de-Mars.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fête de la Concorde, arrivée des corporations au Champ-de-Mars.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Paris-Rome. Beaumont le gagnant sur monoplan Bleriot, moteur Gnome, magneto Bosch.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paris-Rome. Beaumont le gagnant sur monoplan Bleriot, moteur Gnome, magneto Bosch.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Femme Nue dans un Paysage, by Pierre-Auguste Renoir, from C2RMF cropped.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Femme Nue dans un Paysage, by Pierre-Auguste Renoir, from C2RMF cropped.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:L'Embarquement pour Cythere, by Antoine Watteau, from C2RMF retouched.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:L'Embarquement pour Cythere, by Antoine Watteau, from C2RMF retouched.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Federation.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Federation.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:A Brouhot car in Paris, 1910.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A Brouhot car in Paris, 1910.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:CTA Loop Junction Detail.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CTA Loop Junction Detail.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fête de la Fédération.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral of Kon Tum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Lotus

What u did here wasn't kind. Why did u this? Don't think this was good :[ --Chris.urs-o (talk) 12:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Tuyen Lam Lake in morning fog.JPG

Chào Paris, hình như cái hồ ở phía xa là hồ Tuyền Lâm mà phải không nhỉ? PRENN (talk) 11:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Ừm, hì hì, cám ơn bạn. Trước, không nhớ mình đọc ở đâu, ghi là cái hồ đó là hồ Tuyền Lâm; hồi đi chơi cũng nghe gì gì mà không để ý. Giờ mới vừa bay Google Maps lên Đà Lạt, trời ơi hai cái hồ cách nhau chục cây số. Cái hồ kia phải là Hồ Suối Vàng thì mới đúng. Mình sống ở Tp.HCM, cũng rất thích Đà Lạt. Sắp tới mình có dịp tới Đà Lạt, sẽ chụp nhiều hình về thiên nhiên hoa lá. Vậy hén, chúc bạn vui. P/s: đã đổi tên. PRENN (talk) 12:09, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Les colonnes de Buren.jpg

File:Les colonnes de Buren.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Peter17 (talk) 11:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Johan Barthold Jongkind - Rue Notre-Dame, Parijs.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Johan Barthold Jongkind - Rue Notre-Dame, Parijs.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Anish_Kapoor_au_Grand_Palais_Leviathan.jpg

File:Anish_Kapoor_au_Grand_Palais_Leviathan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Coyau (talk) 02:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Cropped maps

Hi, I noticed that you have been cropping some of the Paris maps. Why? The cropped versions you have uploaded are considerably larger in terms of megabytes of data, even though they consist of somewhat fewer pixels. Also you removed small amounts of map information from File:Old map of Paris.jpg. What is the benefit of that? --Robert.Allen (talk) 21:59, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

That seems to be a good compromise. I can see why you wanted to remove the black line at the bottom of File:1652 Gomboust 9 Panel Map of Paris, France (c. 1900 Taride reissue) - Geographicus - Paris-gomboust-1900.jpg, and it is better, if one does crop it, to leave it larger rather than compress yet again. Thanks. --Robert.Allen (talk) 09:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Hanoi_Montage.jpg

File:Hanoi_Montage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 00:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

The Featured Picture Candidate Barnstar

		The Featured Picture Candidate Barnstar
		Herewith I award you, Paris 16, the Featured Picture Candidate Barnstar, for your much valued support of FPC with many fantastic nominations! --ELEKHHT 22:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Elekhh!--Paris 16 (talk) 18:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Commons Photos Usage

Hi,

I'd like to use some of your commons photos for re-sale. What are your attribution requirements? You can contact me at roman.banfield@gmail.com

Thanks!

Roman

File:Palais_des_congrès_de_Paris.jpg

File:Palais_des_congrès_de_Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:21, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colonne de Juillet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Geocoding should be put on the caption of the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. Thanks Archaeodontosaurus!--Paris 16 (talk) 07:21, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

VI

Tu fais la gueule ou tu ne lis pas la page VI? Je veux bien promouvoir, avec plaisir des deux images des expo universelles si tu veux bien modifier un peu le scope... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

It is I who am sorry I thought the French were your language. Good day.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exposition Universelle (1867), panorama.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment World's Fairs are very rich in images. Not to penalize them, I suggest to reduce the scope for "panoramic view of..." --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
• Good scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exposition Universelle (1900), panorama.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment World's Fairs are very rich in images. Not to penalize them, I suggest to reduce the scope for "panoramic view of..." --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Good scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:La Tour St. Jacques La Boucherie à Paris ca. 1867.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Tour St. Jacques La Boucherie à Paris ca. 1867.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Éléphant de la Bastille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Defer Pleased add gallery. พ.s. 23:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
  • IMO this vote is unvalid because of wrong reason, not in the guidelines. Please do not vote on purpose to "make a point".--Jebulon (talk) 10:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

 Support best in scope --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:44, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

• IMO this vote does not concern the picture, but was made only against the vote of w.s. Both behaviours are destroying the project of VI and it is a pity. --Jebulon (talk) 10:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vue officielle a vol d'oiseau de l'exposition universelle de 1867.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vue officielle a vol d'oiseau de l'exposition universelle de 1867.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Centre_Georges-Pompidou_04.jpg

File:Centre_Georges-Pompidou_04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lophotrochozoa (talk) 19:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

New gallery

Hi Paris 16.

As I know you love Paris and his history, this is to let you know this new gallery I have just uploaded. I hope you will find this interesting ! I'll probably nominate it soon as a VI set candidate. Friendly, --Jebulon (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

File:La Pyramide inversée 1.jpg

File:La Pyramide inversée 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:La Pyramide inversée 1.jpg

And also:

• File:La Pyramide inversée 2.jpg
• File:La Pyramide inversée 3.jpg

Yours sincerely Léna (talk) 19:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palais de l'Industrie - Édouard Baldus.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palais de l'Industrie - Édouard Baldus.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Eiffel Tower and Pont Alexandre III at night.jpg

File:Eiffel Tower and Pont Alexandre III at night.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 20:33, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gours des grottes de Saint Marcel d'Ardèche, France.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gours des grottes de Saint Marcel d'Ardèche, France.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Traditional Vietnamese Pool House, Làng Hành Hương.jpg

File:Traditional Vietnamese Pool House, Làng Hành Hương.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Dipankan001 (talk) 09:33, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Transwiki

All your transwikis are wrong. For example File:Hue pilgrimage village breakfast (9).jpg.

• You not provided a link to the original file
• you linked the author on Commons, but the author is on vi.wp.
• the license is nonsense
• its not possible without long searching that the file was uploaded to vi.wp because not even the original filename is given.

Please read the {{Welcome}} template: If you transfare a file make sure to use Commons helper! --Martin H. (talk) 12:33, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

p.s.: And for the vi:User:SonSTC: that user uploaded a lot of copyright infringements to vi.wp, this should be sorted out first before transfering. Especially if transfering in such a bad and wrong way. --Martin H. (talk) 12:34, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eiffel Tower and Pont Alexandre III at night.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eiffel Tower and Pont Alexandre III at night.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:MAP Expo Empereur Ojin Poupée 03 01 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MAP Expo Empereur Ojin Poupée 03 01 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

File:MAP Expo Empereur Ojin Poupée 03 01 2012.jpg

Thanks for sorting the background on this one: just to let you know, I would have changed my vote to support if voting hadn't already finished ! --Claritas (talk) 21:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piscine Molitor, Interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Very good but it lacks the geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Done. Thank Archaeodontosaurus!--Paris 16 (talk) 19:38, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:00, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Salm, exterior, Cour d'honneur side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Okay, the other side is already promoted, should be added "exterior" for buildings.

Okay Archaeodontosaurus, comme tu veux.--Paris 16 (talk) 13:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

 Support Good with the new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:59, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Place des Vosges, July 5, 2007 (2).jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Liberté de panorama

Bonjour,

La France ne dispose pas dans son droit actuel de la liberté de panorama. Ainsi, toute œuvre dont l'auteur est vivant ou pas mort depuis plus de 70 ans n'est pas publiable sans l'accord de l'artiste ou des ayants droit. C'est le cas de la cinémathèque française, des œuvres du musée Zadkine...

Wikimédia France milite pour changer la loi sur le droit d'auteur (amendement proposé en novembre 2011). ~Pyb (talk) 08:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eiffel Tower from the Tour Montparnasse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think that the scopes here can be: one general view of the tower and two or three detailed fragments. The nominated photograph is definitely among my favourites for the scope: Eiffel Tower or Eiffel Tower (general view).--MrPanyGoff 16:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

We have already a valued image with scope Eiffel Tower.--Paris 16 (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

•  Support I agree with, Paris 16. The scope is well defined and the category already eventful. Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:23, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

BSG

Bonjour, merci d'avoir proposé ma photo de la BSG comme FP, et d'en avoir redressé une autre : je suis complètement nulle en corrections de perspective. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 09:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salle de lecture Bibliotheque Sainte-Genevieve n07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salle de lecture Bibliotheque Sainte-Genevieve n07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Centre Georges-Pompidou. Mini-Europe Brussels (France).jpg

File:Centre Georges-Pompidou. Mini-Europe Brussels (France).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 20:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Paris Opera House, Opéra Bastille.jpg

File:Paris Opera House, Opéra Bastille.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jebulon (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for info in the Deletion Request page. I did not know. I remove my DR, obviously, as your info seems to be serious indeed.--Jebulon (talk) 23:31, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

L'open Tour

Thank you for better categorization of my tourist bus !
(and sorry for the DR above, but...)--Jebulon (talk) 15:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont Alexandre III at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:54, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grand foyer of Opéra Garnier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please geocode (COM:VISC #5). --Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

I forgot. It's OK now.--Paris 16 (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

•  Support good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:55, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Fresques

Bonjour,

Je vois que vous téléchargez plusieurs fresques telles que File:Street art, rue de l'Ourcq, Paris N8.jpg. En fait ce n'est pas possible tant qu'on n'a pas l'autorisation écrite de l'artiste. Voyez COM:FOP#France ou le bandeau ci-dessous

Copyright warning: A subject in this image is protected by copyright. This image features an architectural or artistic work, photographed from a public space in France. There are limited Freedom of Panorama exemptions in France, which means that they cannot be photographed freely for anything other than non-commercial purposes. However, French jurisprudence states that no infringement is constituted when the work is an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". If a copyrighted architectural or artistic work is contained in this image and it is a substantial reproduction, this photo cannot be licensed under a free license, and will be deleted. Framing this image to focus on the copyrighted work is also a copyright violation. Before reusing this content, ensure that you have the right to do so. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's copyrights. See our general disclaimer for more information.

. Teofilo (talk) 23:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

File:William Wilberforce 2.jpg

File:William Wilberforce 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Slp1 (talk) 12:51, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Turgot map Paris KU 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Turgot map Paris KU 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Tomer T (talk) 16:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Eglise Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption-de-Passy 2.JPG

Thank you for your correction ! Paterm (talk) 09:36, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome!--Paris 16 (talk) 09:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavillon français, Trianon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cour du Palais des Études de l’École des Beaux-Arts.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Statue of Ferdinand Foch in Paris.jpg

File:Statue of Ferdinand Foch in Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jebulon (talk) 14:13, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Maisons-Laffitte (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met (for exterior) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:56, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salle de lecture vue d'ensemble .jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salle de lecture vue d'ensemble .jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folies Bergère, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Eiffel Tower under construction.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Eiffel Tower under construction.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Musée Jacquemart André, night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Statue of Ferdinand Foch in Paris, November 15, 2011.jpg

And also:

• File:Statue of Ferdinand Foch in Paris. September 26, 2010.jpg

Yours sincerely PierreSelim (talk) 11:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin Mosque (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Good but : It lacks the geocoding and (exterior) in the scope.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Geocode added but could be improved. The camera location appears to be near the west end of the footbridge southwest of the mosque. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:11, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:59, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:La Défense de nuit, Paris, France 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Défense de nuit, Paris, France 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Panoramics

Hi,

Why do you remove files using the template {{panorama}} (thus technically panoramics) from the category panoramics? --Coyau (talk) 12:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

In Category:Panoramics, there are many subcategories that are not "panoramic=wide frame", like this one. I think we still should have technical categories and not only descriptive ones. What do you think of creating a "technical" subcat of category:Panoramics in Paris? --Coyau (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok. Here it is. --Coyau (talk) 14:26, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Palais Omnisports de Paris-Bercy 2010.jpg

File:Palais Omnisports de Paris-Bercy 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lophotrochozoa (talk) 21:22, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Tour Eiffel top.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tour Eiffel top.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tour Eiffel top.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ironwork on the portals of Notre-Dame de Paris (detail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment We should think over a better formulation of the scope. I suggest generalization and the scope: „Portals' ironwork, Notre-Dame de Paris” --MrPanyGoff 17:16, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

It's OK now?--Paris 16 (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for nomination ! I'll add it to my collection of VI !--Jebulon (talk) 10:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption-de-Passy (interior), dome..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good and useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Dominique (interior), dome..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Very good, but I am not sure such a narrow scope is OK. Yann (talk) 19:17, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support The dome seems very specific. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:23, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Théâtre national de Chaillot (grand foyer).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Sacre de l'empereur Napoléon Ier by Jacques-Louis David.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Sacre de l'empereur Napoléon Ier by Jacques-Louis David.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Statue of Joseph Joffre in Paris.jpg

File:Statue of Joseph Joffre in Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 15:11, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Karlie Kloss, Hermes Ready to Wear Spring Summer 2011.jpg

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses

File:Karlie Kloss, Hermes Ready to Wear Spring Summer 2011.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

—LX (talk, contribs) 10:05, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tuileries Palace (bird's-eye view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very didactic work --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Very good! cmadler (talk) 13:01, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:22, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Champs-Élysées from the Arc de Triomphe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. The 55mm gives a real image. Too bad there was a small tilt.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

• ...and vignetting.--Jebulon (talk) 14:41, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

File:La Défense 6.jpg

File:La Défense 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 17:51, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:La Défense, Paris April 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Défense, Paris April 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Le pont rouge uniforme à Cergy Pontoise (95) passe au dessus de l'Oise.jpg

File:Le pont rouge uniforme à Cergy Pontoise (95) passe au dessus de l'Oise.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 12:53, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Société Générale HQ, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Very Good IMO and VI for interior. -- JLPC (talk) 12:34, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:22, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

File:La Défense, Paris April 2012.jpg

File:La Défense, Paris April 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PierreSelim (talk) 13:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

J'ai rajouté le fichier suivant: File:La Défense de nuit, Paris, France 2.jpg. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:30, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel Napoléon, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question When did the architect, Henri Porteau, die? France has no freedom of panorama, and copyright term is 70 years pma (possibly more, due to wartime extensions, particularly if he "died for France"), so this might need to be deleted as unfree. cmadler (talk) 19:35, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I noticed that the photo might have been uploaded by an official hotel representative, and I see that there's an OTRS ticket; I've left a request at the OTRS noticeboard. cmadler (talk) 19:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support According to the OTRS ticket, the uploader claims all rights to the intellectual property in the image. cmadler (talk) 10:19, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Quai François-Mauriac (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château du Plessis-de-Vair, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fort Du Guesclin exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Montaudoin, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:32, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa de la Chantrerie (Nantes), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tour Magne Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:36, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Nice from the fortress.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Caen, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Camera location? --MrPanyGoff 18:19, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Done.Thank MrPanyGoff!--Paris 16 (talk) 00:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:58, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
François Hollande.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Passerelle Simone-de-Beauvoir April 2011.jpg

File:Passerelle Simone-de-Beauvoir April 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jebulon (talk) 10:57, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Place de Dublin depuis la rue de Moscou.jpg

Bonjour,
Pourquoi as-tu chargé une nlle version de ce fichier ? La taille du fichier est 2 fois plus grande, mais je n'ai pas l'impreession que la définition soit meilleure. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Ah, oui. Sur les vignettes je n'avais pas vu, mais effectivement, la perspective est meilleure, merci. J'ai vu que par ailleurs, tu te livres à des travaux de nettoyage et de reclassement. Bonne continuation. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Théâtre Graslin, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

File:JapanExpo 095.jpg

File:JapanExpo 095.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 08:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

File:JapanExpo 099.jpg

File:JapanExpo 099.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 08:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

File:JapanExpo 098.jpg

File:JapanExpo 098.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 08:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

File:JapanExpo 097.jpg

File:JapanExpo 097.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 08:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Charost, garden facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
École nationale supérieure de la police, main building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Collégiale Notre-Dame de Crécy-la-Chapelle, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:32, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Saturnin (Saint-Cernin-de-Reillac), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral Thank you for surprising nomination, but I'm not sure that every church deserves a scope... Anyway, this one is nice, indeed.--Jebulon (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:33, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Disney Parade, Disneyland Paris April 2012.ogv

File:Disney Parade, Disneyland Paris April 2012.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pristurus (talk) 17:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Graffiti artist, Paris June 2010.ogv

File:Graffiti artist, Paris June 2010.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pristurus (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rue de Paris, temps de pluie by Gustave Caillebotte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Serment des Horaces by Jacques-Louis David.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:39, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Embarkation for Cythera by Watteau (Louvre).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It lacks the author's name in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Good scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Et in Arcadia ego by Poussin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It lacks the author's name in the scope. The quality of photography is low, but this is the best for now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:50, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bal du moulin de la Galette by Renoir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I suggest a scope: Bal du moulin de la Galette by Renoir --MrPanyGoff 06:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC) And the same manner for all other paintings nominations.--MrPanyGoff 06:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

• Now the scope names are OK, imo.--MrPanyGoff 11:26, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gare d'Orsay, Seine facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. Best in scope. -- JLPC (talk) 07:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bibliothèque historique de la Ville de Paris, reading room.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. Best in scope. -- JLPC (talk) 07:26, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vault of the Église Saint-Séverin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Whistler's Mother by James McNeill Whistler.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Villa La Roche 2.jpg

File:Villa La Roche 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

124.149.151.113 14:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Villa La Roche 1.jpg

File:Villa La Roche 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

124.149.151.113 14:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais Saint-Georges, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I wonder if we should add Rennes in the scope name to be sure which palace we refer to. For example: Palais Saint-Georges, Rennes (exterior) --MrPanyGoff 12:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

I don't think so. The Palais Saint-Georges is unique. And we dont add "Paris" in the scope Eiffel Tower or Louvre Museum.--Paris 16 (talk) 18:16, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

I did not know this monument, but I asked Mr Google if there was another "Palais Saint-Georges" clearly there is none. The scope is acceptable in its formulation, but I find the remark of MrPanyGoff very fair. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

 Comment - I'm sure this palace is a great place but in terms of popularity the Eiffel Tower and Louvre are far more well-known. They even cannot be compared. Nevertheless, I think that even the Eiffel Tower and Louvre should go with Paris. Yes, most Europeans are familiar with them but can you imagine that half of the population of the world don't know what is Louvre or Eiffel tower at all. By the way, here some example of Saint Georges' palace: [1] and also this Palace hotel in St George's can be confusing.--MrPanyGoff 07:06, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

 Support Maybe there are some "Saint-George (without "s", by the way) Palace" in the world, but I know only one "Palais Saint-Georges" in French, and there is this one. No confusion possible IMO. Best in scope in my opinion. But the addition of "Rennes" could give a better information, indeed. It is the goal of "Commons", after all. That said, far more than the half of the population of the world don't know what "Commons" is, and it is a pity ! ;)--Jebulon (talk) 14:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:09, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison des Arts de Malakoff, Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel des Gouverneurs (Domme), Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:43, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Notre-Dame de Paris, July 22, 2012.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:38, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Musée du Quai Branly April 2010.jpg

File:Musée du Quai Branly April 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:39, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Interior of Theatre Graslin.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Theatre Graslin.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--MrPanyGoff 17:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Clément-Bayard

Hello Paris 16,
you have created the Category:Clément-Bayard with 4 red links to not-existent categories.
To stop confusion between the Établissements Clément and the Établissements Clément-Bayard we should handle both categories separate. Please do not put one of this categories in the other. --Buch-t (talk) 07:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lyon monumental, 1894.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lyon monumental, 1894.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancien Palais du Trocadéro, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope On a bien fait de ne pas le garder--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:35, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont génois de Pianella.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Cathédrale Saint-Étienne de Metz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope IMO. --JLPC (talk) 08:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame du Port (Nice), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope, IMO. --JLPC (talk) 08:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Paul de Strasbourg, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Although this is not a criteria, a perspective correction would be welcome. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Done.--Paris 16 (talk) 07:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:46, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais du Rhin, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Although this is not a criteria, a perspective correction would be welcome. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Done.--Paris 16 (talk) 07:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Limeuil, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Illustrative, quality and well described. --MrPanyGoff 19:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château du Roc, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Maintenon, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support There is an aerial view which is very informative and interesting but not so good quality.--MrPanyGoff 19:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont de Deyme.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:04, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tour des Pénitents.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 SupportBest in scope, IMO. --JLPC (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:03, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont de Quézac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in the scope.--MrPanyGoff 08:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cour d'appel d'Angers, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in the scope.--MrPanyGoff 08:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:59, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château des Montgommery, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Although this is not a criteria, a perspective correction would be welcome. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Done.--Paris 16 (talk) 07:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Very good & useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:44, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Courtils.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Chatou.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, the object is very well described in the file page. Why did you start so many nominations at once? --MrPanyGoff 11:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame de Chatou, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, the object is well described in the file page. --MrPanyGoff 11:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Vert-Mont, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment SET A would have been helpful here. Otherwise I suggest to reduce the scope to "Facade" --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

The scope is changed.--Paris 16 (talk) 18:37, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:17, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Théâtre municipal de Coulommiers, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I suggest to reduce the scope to Facade --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

I agree! For the scope "exterior", a picture like this one is better. --Paris 16 (talk) 18:43, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:16, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Petite VIsite de remerciements

Bonjour Paris16,
Merci pour les nominations de mes images en VI ! Bien cordialement, --Myrabella (talk) 22:12, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Statue of Joseph Joffre in Paris 2009-12-25.jpg

File:Statue of Joseph Joffre in Paris 2009-12-25.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.217.6.97 20:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Statue of Joseph Joffre in Paris. May 16, 2008.jpg

File:Statue of Joseph Joffre in Paris. May 16, 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.217.6.97 20:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Carla Bruni-Sarkozy

Salut Remi Jouan! Où tu as pris la photo de Carla Bruni? C'était l'avenue Winston Churchill à Paris?--Paris 16 (talk) 23:42, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Cette photo a étée prise lors de la Cérémonie du 11 Novembre en 2008 au pieds de la statue Clemenceau se trouvant à l’angle de l’avenue Winston Churchill et de l’avenue des Champs-Élysées. Bon week-end. CaptainHaddock (talk) 07:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Hotel de Ville de St Emilion

Je t’embête avec mes respectivement courbes, mais, qui aime bien châtie bien. Je ne sais pas à qui faire cette remarque, mais la photo de l’hôtel de ville semble avoir été promue QI. Je le crois car je l'y ai mis elle n'y est plus et surtout j'ai sur ma page de discussion le bandeau ad hoc, mais il n'y a rien sur la photo elle même. Il celui de VI mais pas de QI. Si c'est pas trop difficle et si tu m'explique je peux peut-être le faire manuellement. Merci de tes lumière. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Move request

The move request for File:Shrine to Léon Gambetta, Paris, France, ca. 1890-1900.jpg is a bit confusing. The description still indicates Paris. Is the shrine not in Paris, and, if so, where is it? Maybe the actual location, if different, should be substituted for Paris. INeverCry 19:53, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

I moved the file and substituted Nice for Paris. I also changed the description. I hadn't thought to click on the Cimetière du château category. ;) INeverCry 00:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Feu de Saint-Pol.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criteria; best in scope. cmadler (talk) 13:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cimetière de Seclin, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mairie de Morbecque, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This image has no description of its subject (criterion 4).--MrPanyGoff 11:20, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Thank MrPanyGoff!--Paris 16 (talk) 11:39, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Meets the criteria now.--MrPanyGoff 19:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancienne tour du Guet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in the scope.--MrPanyGoff 19:38, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:16, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Please don't nominate further images of me.--Havang(nl) (talk) 08:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Bailleul, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best exterior view in the category.--MrPanyGoff 11:34, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:16, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Comines, Nord, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de ville de Tourcoing, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope, IMO. --JLPC (talk) 06:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Christophe (Tourcoing), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best exterior view in the category.--MrPanyGoff 11:28, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moulin à vent de Nortbécourt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This image has no description of its subject (criterion 4).--MrPanyGoff 11:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Thank MrPanyGoff!--Paris 16 (talk) 11:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

 Support VI now, IMO. --JLPC (talk) 06:35, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Ajaccio, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Beauvais (Limoges), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gare d'Ussel, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Al criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Immeuble Delabergerie, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Écomusée de Martinique, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

A perspective correction would be very welcome. it is likely that even the chimney can be curved --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:38, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Done.--Paris 16 (talk) 15:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Sainte-Catherine de Grand'Rivière, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me, Too bad we do not have a view from the exterior. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carla Bruni.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Not geocoded. I agree that this is best in scope, and will support once it's geocoded. cmadler (talk) 12:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Maybe this photo was taken on avenue des Champs Elysées. I'm still waiting a response from Remi Jouan.--Paris 16 (talk) 14:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Done!--Paris 16 (talk) 10:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Per above. cmadler (talk) 12:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Téat Champ Fleuri, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château Morange, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tribunal de grande instance de Saint-Denis, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lac Dziani.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Symphorien de Biozat, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chalet de Clermont-Tonnerre, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:10, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château du Vieux-Melay, aerial photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:10, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moulin de l'Ingratitude.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Although the windmill leans naturally, but a little perspective correction, would be welcome anyway. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment I find that condense line a bit disturbing.--Havang(nl) (talk) 10:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 09:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:26, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame de l'Assomption (Sainte-Marie), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best (only) in scope and meets all criteria. cmadler (talk) 17:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Monuments historiques in Paris

Monuments historiques in France are not only buildings. See: Monument historique (France).--Reinhardhauke (talk) 14:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Description de File:Grand entrance, Exposition Universal, 1900, Paris, France.jpg

Je pense qu'on a bien avancé (j'ai rajouté quelques modifs dont le modèle {{Artwork}}). Par contre je ne comprends pas les différences de couleurs par rapport à la source de la Library of Congress. Sachant que c'est un photochrome les couleurs peuvent paraître bizarre sur la source et être bonne. Enfin pour la couleur je pourrais vraiment pas dire laquelle est la bonne version. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alcatt.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alcatt.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Merci

Pour le noinclude sur la doc du modèle {{Wlmfr 2012 no}} --PierreSelim (talk) 11:56, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Commanderie de Villemoison, exterior.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Commanderie de Villemoison, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:29, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main entrance of the Exposition Universelle (1900).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

* Comment there is no description, no author ... is it a painting ? --PierreSelim (talk) 09:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

• It seems the architect of the entrance is René Binet

  I didn't find anything on the photographer, however the description at the LOC is better than ours. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support probably best in scope, even though i'm not convinced by the white balance of this photochrom. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:00, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gargla.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gargla.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Institut d'art et d'archéologie 2009.JPG

File:Institut d'art et d'archéologie 2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Remi Mathis (talk) 21:35, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Palais du Louvre, pavillon Richelieu.jpg

File:Palais du Louvre, pavillon Richelieu.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

ComputerHotline (talk) 11:27, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Palais du Louvre, pavillon Richelieu.jpg

File:Palais du Louvre, pavillon Richelieu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 19:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais du Luxembourg (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:30, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grande Roue de Paris (1900).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Paris 16, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 02:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Entrée Institut de France 23 quai de Conti.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Entrée Institut de France 23 quai de Conti.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Grands Moulins de Pantin.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grands Moulins de Pantin.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:A 360 around Main Street, Disneyland Paris June 2010.ogv

File:A 360 around Main Street, Disneyland Paris June 2010.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 15:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

File:La France renaissante April 2012 N3.jpg

File:La France renaissante April 2012 N3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 20:45, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

File:La France renaissante April 2012 N1.jpg

File:La France renaissante April 2012 N1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 20:46, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Madame Ngô Đình Nhu.jpg

File:Madame Ngô Đình Nhu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Odessey (talk) 11:10, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token d6dc458baee12808a08d4bf75eb22984

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Palais de la Porte Doree 20060816.jpg

File:Palais de la Porte Doree 20060816.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 02:44, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Cat's locations Paris

Pour categoriser: File:Paris, Limande au marché.JPG, File:Paris, des pieuvres au marché.JPG et File:Paris, Stockfish au marché.JPG ont été pris au Marché de la Bastille, Boulevard Richard Lenoir. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:04, 6 December 2012 (UTC)