User talk:Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv/2017-2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"Babys in pouches"[edit]

Hello, if you are going to create the marsupial pouches categories, please spell it "babies in pouches" instead of "babys". Also, it would help to have parent categories, maybe add them to the anatomy categories. This would help with organization. Thanks for your help. If you don't correct the spelling, I will do it, please don't be offended and don't revert corrections. Have fun, Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't correct the spelling you changed the category to something completely different, which isn't correct. A whole kangoroo with a baby in the pouch ist not simply a pouch. It schouldn't be directly in the kangoroo pouch category, but it is ok to put the category "Category:Marsupialia with babies in pouches" as a whole in "Category:Marsupial pouches". It's the same principle why you dont put cats with blue eyes directly in the cat eyes category but it is ok to do so via a "cats with blue eyes"-category.
Additionally for "Category:Marsupialia with babies in pouches" an anatomy category is an incorrect parent category, as it is not about anatomy but it is primarily a mother with child category. Kersti (talk) 17:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem[edit]

Hello Kersti. Just to let you know about this edit. I’ve fixed the problem. Carry on. Green Giant (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Periparus ater (illustrations) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:BelgianDraftHorse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kersti,

this is not English!--Geologiya (talk) 15:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you are right. The problem is that management was not finished yet, and all the images in this category I have moved to a new category (I just created): Category:Human lens. In the same way I had already created Category:Orbit (anatomy) -> Category:Human orbit. Finally I added a new category to Schneckenauge.jpg. Thanks. --Jmarchn (talk) 18:04, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cardellina canadensis[edit]

Hi! I am about to remove your template for VN from the category so it can use wikidata. I am sad about this because the template is really nice. Category:Cardellina canadensis. I guess that is all. (sniffle)--RaboKarbakian (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Sheep testicles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bay foals with their mothers[edit]

Hey, I noticed you recently created Category:Bay foals with their mothers. Can you explain why this is a meaningful distinction from any other foals with their mothers, and bay foals in any other context? Cat Bay foals is pretty bloated, but IMO we could split it in some other ways that could be more useful. Such as by stage of coat development (before, during, after first coat shed). And of course at this point we can remove less than decent photos from the category. Glad to see you back btw! --Pitke (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you think, that there is a better way of splitting the categories this would be ok for me. On the other hand I think that there are enough bay foals not yet categoriced as bay foals, that alls these distinktions could be made without having categories with less than 20 photos. Kersti (talk) 08:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Get consensus[edit]

Sorry, you don’t have consensus to remove images from existing categories. Mark Marathon (talk) 00:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello! See how I recategorized this category, creating Category:Hemosiderosis. Thanks. Jmarchn (talk) 15:41, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with your change (you has been moved this category to Category:Inner ear), because all its content is referred only to human diseases. Of course exists this diseases in others mammals and vertebrates. When someone uploads a file/s referred to diseases of mammals or other vertebrates then it could be created Category:Human diseases and disorders of inner ear. --Jmarchn (talk) 16:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

disorganised hair cells in tailchaser mice - inner ear mutation
Scanning electron micrographs demonstrating the different patterns of hair cell production along the length of the cochlea in Jag1-cko embryos in mice

@Jmarchn:

  1. I don't agree that vertigo is a human disease. - it is based on the general functioning of the mammalian inner ear, therefore it should exist in all mammals. Of course it is a subjective symptom and animals can't tell us, that they feel vertigo, therefore it ist difficult to diagnose it in animals.
  2. It is not true that examples of diseases of the inner ear in animals are not yet uploadet. But if you hide the approbiate categories in the human diseases category tree it is a real problem to categorice them properly!
  3. A category named Category:Diseases and disorders of inner ear has simply the wrong name to be a subcategory of Category:Human inner ear
  4. Homozygous merle dogs in some cases are deaf due to problems in the inner ear, same is correct for Dalmatians
  5. en:Congenital sensorineural deafness in cats is a congenital deafness caused by a degeneration of the inner ear.

--Kersti (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I created Category:Diseases and disorders of human inner ear and fill it. --Jmarchn (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator?[edit]

Hi Kersti. Are you interested in being a candidate for administrator? If so, I would be happy to nominate you. --99of9 (talk) 10:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@99of9: After thinking some days about this, I still think, that I would use the administrator right almost exclusively to correct my own faults. If this is reason enough, to make me an administrator, I think it is OK for me, but I don't think that I am much help for the work administrators usually do. Kersti (talk) 11:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for thinking about it. That's probably not a wide enough scope, but if your workflows or interests later change, don't hesitate to let us know. All the best and thanks again for all your work! --99of9 (talk) 12:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Are you sure it's dead? I think it's just in defensive position (exposing sting). Salicyna (talk) 18:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The original description by the photographer says, that it is dead. Kersti (talk) 20:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, you're right :) Salicyna (talk) 20:06, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Carling King - 03.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Carling King - 03.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Castillo blanco (talk) 09:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Elytra[edit]

Hi there; I just happened to notice you've been categorising some images of beetles with "coleoptera elytrae". Elytra is already the plural; the singular for a beetle wing cover is elytrum. You may want to fix those category names. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 01:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gravures de l'Histoire des oiseaux[edit]

Bonjour,

Excusez moi de ne parler ni l'allemand, ni l'anglais. J'ai importé plusieurs gravures du livre "Histoire des oiseaux" par François-Nicolas Martinet (1790-1796) regroupées dans la Category:Histoire des oiseaux par François-Nicolas Martinet. Si vous pouvez, merci de mettre les noms latins de chaque oiseau.

Merci de votre aide. Robert Valette (talk) 18:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Berittene Polizei Naadam 2010.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Berittene Polizei Naadam 2010.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Chiyako92 (talk) 18:28, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Western Serengeti 2012 06 03 3722 (7557814100).jpg[edit]

Bist du dir sicher mit der Bestimmung? Sieht für mich eher wie ein Reiher aus. Gruß --Veliensis (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das wird eine dieser großartigen Gelegenheiten gewesen sein, wo ich meinte das eine im Copy-Past-Speicher zu haben aber tatsächlich das andere noch drin war. Du hast völlig recht! Kersti (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Bird egg categories[edit]

Hi Kersti - when you make these, could you use the sort code "| eggs" (with a space) rather than "|eggs", please. Otherwise they appear as if they are subspecies subcategories, rather than otherwise. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 16:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is how I normally do it - I must have had my bad day. Sorry. Kersti (talk) 20:06, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About medicine[edit]

Hello!. I see that many times you also categorize medicine files. I have written this note to inform you that I have practically finished the implementation of the navigation box for diseases and health problems {{DiseasesNav}} (programming in Lua the corresponding module) and using the template in more than 7000 pages. As you can see, the navigation box allows you to jump to the "side-by-side" subcategory, among the "standardized" ones. Surely I would have had to do it a bit more sophisticated (not having to introduce parameters, but it occurred to me too late to learn a little more about Lua). Jmarchn (talk) 16:33, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Görlitz[edit]

Du hat ein paar meiner Bilder, die in Frankfurt entstanden sind, unter Görlitz eingetragen ([1]), sind diese Replika jetzt tatsächlich dort dauerhaft gelander? Gruß, --Gerbil (talk) 15:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChilotesAusschnitt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fallen Sheep (talk) 09:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Animation_for_astrophysics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 08:26, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Histopathology of anaplastic astrocytoma has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


68.65.70.238 23:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2019[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--23:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Blue-eyed animals has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Trade (talk) 16:42, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kersti, warum hast du die cat:Tick bites entfernt. Da das Bein mein eigenes ist, bin ich mir diesbzgl. absolut sicher. --Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bezweifle nicht, daß da eine Zecke gebissen hat, doch wirklich sichtbar ist das Erythema migrans während ich zumindest den zweifelsfrei vorhandenen Biß nicht sehe. --Kersti (talk) 21:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

विकी लभ्स अर्थ २०२० नेपाल खुल्ला छ![edit]

नमस्कार! हामी घोषणा गर्न पाउँदा खुसी छौं कि विकी लभ्स अर्थ २०२० नेपाल अहिलेसम्म पनि खुल्ला छ। तपाईंको सहभागिताले हामीलाई नेपालको प्रकृतिलाई अभिलेखिकरण गर्न र यसलाई विकिपिडिया तथा यसका अन्य परियोजनाहरू मार्फत विश्वलाई देखाउन मद्दत गर्दछ। नियमहरू पढ्नको लागि कृपया प्रतियोगिताको पृष्ठमा जानुहोस्: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Nepal । त्यहाँ तपाइँले प्रतियोगितामा कसरी भाग लिने भनेर पनि थाहा पाउनु हुनेछ। यदि तपाईंसँग केहि प्रश्नहरू छन् भने कृपया हामीलाई सम्पर्क गर्नुहोस्: https://www.facebook.com/WLENepal

धन्यवाद,
विकी लभ्स अर्थ २०२० नेपाल आयोजक समिती 14:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channel - C. elegans TAX-4.PNG

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channel - C. elegans TAX-4.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) 20:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:2008 KY state Fair Morgan Horse Show.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : I no longer want my photos in wikimedia commons. I didn't understand the ramifications of my work being used, worldwide without my specifc permission. I also realize now that it was a mistake to allow photos of my son or family and friends in wikimedia commons. I've also been contacted by horse owners over the years that are unhappy about their photos being in wikimedia and I'm worried about being sued ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by Abounaderphoto. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:11, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Highland Pony Stallion.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : I no longer want my photos in wikimedia commons. I didn't understand the ramifications of my work being used, worldwide without my specifc permission. I also realize now that it was a mistake to allow photos of my son or family and friends in wikimedia commons. I've also been contacted by horse owners over the years that are unhappy about their photos being in wikimedia and I'm worried about being sued ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by Abounaderphoto. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:11, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Rocky Mountain Pony.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : I no longer want my photos in wikimedia commons. I didn't understand the ramifications of my work being used, worldwide without my specifc permission. I also realize now that it was a mistake to allow photos of my son or family and friends in wikimedia commons. I've also been contacted by horse owners over the years that are unhappy about their photos being in wikimedia and I'm worried about being sued ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by Abounaderphoto. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:11, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Caspian Stallion 1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : I no longer want my photos in wikimedia commons. I didn't understand the ramifications of my work being used, worldwide without my specifc permission. I was deeply depressed when I OK'd the photos and I do not have proper releases for the photos I took. I also realize now that it was a mistake to allow photos of my son or family and friends in wikimedia commons. I've also been contacted by horse owners over the years that are unhappy about their photos being in wikimedia and I'm worried about being sued ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by Abounaderphoto. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Fell Ponies - Mare and foal.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : I no longer want my photos in wikimedia commons. I didn't understand the ramifications of my work being used, worldwide without my specifc permission. I was deeply depressed when I OK'd the photos and I do not have proper releases for the photos I took. I also realize now that it was a mistake to allow photos of my son or family and friends in wikimedia commons. I've also been contacted by horse owners over the years that are unhappy about their photos being in wikimedia and I'm worried about being sued ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by Abounaderphoto. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Gotland-Russ Ponies 1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : I no longer want my photos in wikimedia commons. I didn't understand the ramifications of my work being used, worldwide without my specifc permission. I was deeply depressed when I OK'd the photos and I do not have proper releases for the photos I took. I also realize now that it was a mistake to allow photos of my son or family and friends in wikimedia commons. I've also been contacted by horse owners over the years that are unhappy about their photos being in wikimedia and I'm worried about being sued ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by Abounaderphoto. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Highland Pony head.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : I no longer want my photos in wikimedia commons. I didn't understand the ramifications of my work being used, worldwide without my specifc permission. I was deeply depressed when I OK'd the photos and I do not have proper releases for the photos I took. I also realize now that it was a mistake to allow photos of my son or family and friends in wikimedia commons. I've also been contacted by horse owners over the years that are unhappy about their photos being in wikimedia and I'm worried about being sued ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by Abounaderphoto. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Highland pony in costume.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : I no longer want my photos in wikimedia commons. I didn't understand the ramifications of my work being used, worldwide without my specifc permission. I was deeply depressed when I OK'd the photos and I do not have proper releases for the photos I took. I also realize now that it was a mistake to allow photos of my son or family and friends in wikimedia commons. I've also been contacted by horse owners over the years that are unhappy about their photos being in wikimedia and I'm worried about being sued ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by Abounaderphoto. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Highland Pony.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : I no longer want my photos in wikimedia commons. I didn't understand the ramifications of my work being used, worldwide without my specifc permission. I also realize now that it was a mistake to allow photos of my son or family and friends in wikimedia commons. I've also been contacted by horse owners over the years that are unhappy about their photos being in wikimedia and I'm worried about being sued ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by Abounaderphoto. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Birds building nests has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Reseletti (talk) 14:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained edit[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Myotis_californicus_skull_-_Burke_Museum_-_02.jpg&curid=85111258&diff=442786474&oldid=397253917 and several similar edits. No edit summary, so I have no idea what you thought was wrong with the category you removed. An explanation would be appreciated, and please use edit summaries. - Jmabel ! talk 00:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was, that there existed a much bigger Category:Chiroptera museum specimens. Therefore I redirected Category:Chiroptera (museum specimens) to it. I thougt, that this category is not nessesary in this example, but you may think differently and add Category:Chiroptera museum specimens. Kersti (talk) 01:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The redirect was fine, but now I have to go back & find the multiple photos of mine from which you simply removed the category without comment. Again, please use edits summaries. - Jmabel ! talk 23:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gallwespen an Eichen: Blatt- und Knospengallen[edit]

Hallo Kersti, vielen Dank für Deine Mühe mit den Kategorien (Ergänzungen und Verbesserungen). Mit den Wespen-Blattgallen an Eichen ist es aber etwas problematisch, weil die Wespen einen Generationswechsel durchmachen und einige im Wechsel Blätter und Winterknospen (oft der selben Eichenart) befallen. Die Blattgallen sind dünn- und weichschalig, die Knospengallen haben außen eine etwas stärkere holzige Schale (z. B. hier). In einem Fall betrifft das diese Änderung, außerdem habe ich noch zwei unvollständige Fälle.

Wenn man davon ausgeht, dass es sich ja in beiden Generationen um das Organ Blatt handelt, ginge das in Ordnung. Für mich scheint es aber unterschiedlich zu sein. Soll ich dies betreffend Deine Änderung(en) zurücksetzen oder wäre es eine bessere Idee, für die Gallen an Triebspitzen / Winterknospen eine andere Kategorie anzulegen (Galls on Quercus xxx buds - vielleicht gibt es auch einen besseren Namen - und wo andocken ?)

Allerdings sind die Knospengallen wohl seltener zu finden oder zumindest fotografiert und mit Bildern vertreten, zumindest scheint mir das so. Plausibler Erklärungsversuch: sie sind länger irgendwo in der Krone des Baums und haben, wenn sie fallen, keine sperrigen Anhängsel. Es kann natürlich auch sein, dass diese Generation tatsächlich anzahlmäßig seltener auftritt. Daher könnten bisher auch die Andockstellen im Kategoriebaum fehlen.

Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 19:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In die Knospengallen würde ich, da sie so selten sind, zwei Kategorien, einmal die Wespenart und einmal "Galls on Quercus", für die Blattgallen habe ich eine extra Kategorien angelegt, weil es eben so viele sind. Kersti (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, dann mach ich für die entsprechende Wespen-Art so weit zutreffend Galls on Quercus (spec.) buds lokal und verlinke auf Galls on Quercus (spec., so weit vorhanden). Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 20:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

kleiner Irrtum[edit]

Hallo Kersti, Du ordnest gerade ein paar Schwebfliegen auf Herbstkrokus-Blüten die Kategorie Episyrphus balteatus on Asterales flowers zu. Richtig wäre ... on Asparagales flowers, aber die gibts noch nicht. Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 12:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, richtig wäre es gewesen, "Asterales" aus der Kategoriebezeichnung zu löschen. Ich kontrolliere nachher nochmal, wo ich das übersehen habe. --Kersti (talk) 13:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Danke ! Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 18:54, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:11, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danke[edit]

Hallo Kersti, Danke für Deine Vervollständigung und Verbesserung der Kategorisierungen! Ich wünsche Dir frohe Feiertage ohne Stress und ein gutes (oder besseres) neues Jahr ohne Corona. Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 21:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Kersti, es gibt für Ilex aquifolium, Ilex und nicht mal für Aquifoliales eine Kategorie "Deseases and disorders of ...". Allerdings gibt es Category:Ilex leaves with mines. Hat das Gründe oder ist es einfach (z.B. aufgrund der Anzahl von Bildern) von niedriger Priorität ? Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 18:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Das spiegelt eher meine Reihenfolge der Bearbeitung wieder als die wichtigkeit der Kategorien.
Ich sortiere im Augenblick Category:Leaf mining durch, indem ich zuerst überprüfe, ob jede einzelne Datei die Kategorien von sowohl Wirtpflanze als auch den Parasit enthält und auch dort in der nächstegelenen leaf-mines Kategorien sowohl bei den Tieren als auch bei den Pflanzen ist, wobei ich die jeweiligen Tier und Pflanzenkategorien auch auf weitere geeignete Bilder durchgehe. Danach kommt Category:Galls. Als nächstes habe ich die Pilzerkrankungen auf dem Schirm. Jedenfalls stelle ich fest, daß die meisten dieser Bilder unvollständig kategorisiert sind und daß man davon ausgehen kann, daß sich durchaus noch Bilder für die Diseases and disorders Kategorien finden, auch wenn ich die Kategorie ndoof finde - womit ich sagen will, das ist eine Geschmacksfrage, mich interessiert an der Geschichte nicht, daß es eine Krankheit ist, sondern daß es sich um ein Tier handelt. Den theoretischen Sinn der "Diseases and disorders"-Kategorien sehe ich schon ein und werde sie entsprechend auch anlegen sobald ich die Bilder dazu gefunden habe. Ich gehe davon aus, daß es an Bildern jetzt schon nicht mangelt, sie sind nur nicht auffindbar, weil nicht entsprechend kategorisiert. Kersti (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Kersti, Danke für die Antwort. Ich verstehe auch die Reihenfolge, systematisch muss man schon vorgehen. Gelegentlich hab ich auch schon mal eine solche Lücke geschlossen, dort geht sie halt über mehrere Ebenen und passende Bilder hatte ich im Vorbeisehen nicht gefunden. Eben auch nicht gesucht, weil ich in erster Linie mein Zeug unterbringen wollte. Offensichtliche Sachen hätte ich gerade noch so versucht mit abzuarbeiten. Aber für das, was Du so systematisch tust, reicht es bei mir nicht - um so mehr schätze ich Deine Arbeit. Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 16:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback![edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pitke (talk) 20:31, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to comment![edit]

You commented in the original Heather Moreton-Aboudaner RfD. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Continental European breed files from Heather Moreton-Abounader Flickr stream is now open, your comments would be appreciated. --Pitke (talk) 20:51, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Heteroptera vs. Coleoptera[edit]

Hello, i noticed your changes on File:Coleoptera on Poaceae.jpg, adding it to the "unidentified Hemiptera category. Thanks for the changes, I am not good at telling them apart and may have made a mistake when i proposed the Coleoptera name for the file. If you are certain it's a Hemiptera, then we should propose that the file is renamed. Cheers, YuriNikolai (talk) 23:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am pritty shure that I am right, but usually rename a picture only if it is identified to a more specific category, as usually no one uses a picture on which none of the depicted species is identified. Kersti (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Eriocnemis aline has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Andreas von Stackelberg (talk) 02:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ships named after[edit]

Refer your change amongst others.

"Ships named after ..." is one of a series of cats designed for maintenance and search, It's a sieve for gathering disparate images, with words in common like (for example) Vanessa. The cats in it are not permanent viewing cats like ships named after rivers etc... Its for sorting and filing. Not casual viewing.

In that context words like Apollo, tiger, Nile is irrelevant and divorce from significances.

It fell under "Category:Ships with the same name" which did have 5305 menmbers, 5306 before your change.

These ships are now under "Things named after wolverines" which is some other thing and is not now, in view, along ship lines, and is no longer useful for search purposes.

This search thing is the fundamental reason why trawlers, submarines, smacks, and most painfully yachts, always have ship in their title (in commons), to simplify search.

If you want to play around with something like "Things named after wolverines" there can be no objection to adding that cat to "Ships named Wolverine", however deleting it is unacceptable.

Hope you understand this or not? Broichmore (talk) 12:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merfelder Bruch[edit]

Hallo! Ich habe deine Umkategorisierungen gesehen. Eine habe ich rückgängig gemacht, denn Category:Arena at Wildpferdebahn (Merfelder Bruch) ist zwar mitten in dem Naturschutzgebiet Category:Wildpferdebahn im Merfelder Bruch (nature reserve), ist aber nicht Teil des Naturschutzgebiets. Daher war die Arena bewusst der Kategorie Category:Merfelder Bruch zugeordnet. Auch der Wildpferdefang gehört - bezogen auf den Fang - nicht in das Naturschutzgebiet. --XRay 💬 17:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe mir das Ganze noch einmal angesehen. Die Kategorien sind fürchterlich durcheinander. Das Landschaftsschutzgebiet hat nichts mit dem Naturschutzgebiet zu tun, sie sind nur benachbart. Der Merfelder Bruch ist teilweise im Landschaftsschutzgebiet, teilweise im Naturschutzgebiet. Die Arena ist nicht Teil beider Schutzgebiete, wohl aber des Merfelder Bruchs. Pferde sind im Naturschutzgebiet und in der Arena. Irgendwie muss ich das mal ganz anders kategorisieren. Ich mache das mal in einer stillen Stunde. --XRay 💬 20:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cercidiphyllum ...[edit]

...magnificum is still the name of this picture — which is thought to be misnamed, cause the plant shown might be an exemplum of C. japonicum (following the description and this reference, respectively). Do you agree? R*elation (talk) 20:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I simply don't know and categoriced according to picture name, therefore do what you think is correct. Kersti (talk) 20:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--15:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified Angiosperms versus Unidentified Dianthus[edit]

Hallo! Du hast File:Schwalbenschwanz Erlangen Aromagarten 02.jpg in Category:Unidentified Dianthus einsortiert, aber File:Schwalbenschwanz Erlangen Aromagarten 01.jpg in Category:Unidentified Angiosperms. Ich selber habe von Botanik keine Ahnung, deshalb halte ich mich da raus. Aber wenn das erste Bild eine Nelke (Dianthus) zeigt, dann ist das auf dem zweiten Bild auch eine. Es handelt sich nämlich um dieselbe Pflanze. Und dann sollte das zweite Bild wohl auch in die spezifischere Kategorie eingeordnet werden. Viele Grüße, --Rotkraut (talk) 20:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prompte Reaktion! Vielen Dank und schönen Abend noch, --Rotkraut (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tja ich hatte einfach zu viele andere Bilder zwischen den beiden, so daß mir das nicht aufgefallen war. Sonst hätte ich das schon selber übernommen. Kersti (talk) 21:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Hi Kersti Nebelsiek. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than using the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 13:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply] Palosirkka (talk) 13:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 13:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 15:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply] Palosirkka (talk) 15:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 09:36, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 09:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply] Palosirkka (talk) 09:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 08:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 09:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified Caprifoliaceae???[edit]

Hallo Kersti, Du hattest Mitte Februar bei meinen fünf Fotos (File:Andrena sp. (dkrb-[12345]).jpg) jeweils die Kategorie "Unidentified Caprifolicaceae" eingetragen - obwohl ich in der Bild-Beschreibung die Blüte eindeutig als Knautia arvensis angegeben habe. Natürlich sind auf den Fotos nur Blütendetails zu sehen, aber ich kenne die ganze Pflanze (eigener Garten, selbst angesät) und bin mir daher sicher, dass es sich um eine Ackerwitwenblume handelt (s. a. meine Anfrage in https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redaktion_Biologie/Bestimmung/Archiv/039#Unbekannte_Wildbiene_-_Andrena_sp.?). Verwirrt, --Burkhard (talk) 18:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Das hatte ich einfach übersehen. Ich habe es jetzt entsprechend korrigiert. Manchmal ist man beim kategorisieren einfach zu schnell und übersieht dann etwas, was wichtig gewesen wäre. --Kersti (talk) 18:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category[edit]

Hi! I assume this is a mistake? -- Syrio posso aiutare? 12:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missing category[edit]

I rarely disagree with your edits, which are usually excellent, but this edit moves a file from a category that exists into one that doesn't. - Jmabel ! talk 18:13, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was too much telephone besides editing! Kersti (talk) 19:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bratyna[edit]

Hi! What is Bratyna? --Микола Василечко (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A genus of beetles. Kersti (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit war[edit]

Deutsch  English  français  italiano  magyar  português  sicilianu  русский  日本語  +/−


You currently appear to be participating in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:55, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorie Ahlberg[edit]

Hallo Kersti, bitte beachte beim Kategorisieren etwas auf die Unterscheidung: der Wohnplatz Ahlberg (Immenhausen) darf nicht in dieselbe Kategorie wie der Berg Ahlberg (Reinhardswald). GeorgDerReisende (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ich denke noch einmal drüber nach, wie man das besser machen kann, möglicherweise nehme ich einfach den einen einzigen Straßennahmen für einzelne Häuser, aber letztlich liegt die Siedlung nun mal auf dem Berg, deshalb ist der Unterschied gar nicht so groß und das Problem auch nicht so einfach zu lösen. Kersti (talk) 14:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Apis mellifera - wild nests has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 19:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Verkehrsschäden an Bäumen[edit]

Hallo Kersti, ich suche eine Commons-Kategorie für Schäden an (Allee- und evtl. anderen) Bäumen durch Fahrzeuge. So etwas wie Trees damaged by ... Hast Du da eine Idee ? Danke und viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 00:10, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, habe da zwei neue Kategorien angelegt :-) und die Lücke(n) geschlossen. Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 13:32, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kurfürstentum Hessen, Kartenblatt Veckerhagen von 1857.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kurfürstentum Hessen, Kartenblatt Veckerhagen von 1857.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pulverhäuser[edit]

Liebe Kersti, Du hattest kürzlich bei der Category:Old Powder House (Pommritz) die Kategorie Category:Watchman's houses in Saxony ergänzt. Das ist aber so nicht ganz richtig. Die Pulverhäuser wurden errichtet, als Deutschland einen Krieg mit Österreich befürchtete und deshalb wichtige Eisenbahnviadukte zur Sprengung vorbereitete (mit Sprengkammern in den Pfeilern der Viadukte und weiter weg gelegenen Lagerhäusern für das nötige Pulver). Die Pulverhäuser waren lediglich Lager für das Pulver, wurden aber zur Überwachung in Sichtweite von "Watchman's houses" aufgestellt. Insofern gehören sie schon etwas dazu, sind aber keine Bahnwärterhäuser gewesen. Ich überlasse es Dir, ob es so bleiben soll. Wenn ja, dann müssten auch die anderen Pulverhäuser mit dieser Kategorie versehen werden, zum Beispiel das Category:Old Powder House (Großschweidnitz) am Viadukt Höllengrund. Herzliche Grüße, --PaulT (talk) 08:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dann sollte diese Angabe auch auf Wikidata gelöscht werden, in der Wikidata-Infobox steht nämlich die Behauptung, es würde sich um ein Bahnwätrthaus handeln und danach hatte ich mich gerichtet, weil ich es für möglich hielt, daß ein Bahnwärterhaus einfach umgenutzt wurde. Kersti (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, sollten wir machen. Das hatte ich in letzter Zeit oft, dass jemand etwas Falsches bei Wikidata eingetragen hat. Das Projekt Wikidata ist wohl sehr gut gemeint, kann aber von den weinigen Wikipedianern nicht sinnvoll gewartet und befüllt werden, leider ... Also bitte nicht ohne weitere Recherchen glauben, was da steht. --PaulT (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, hat heute schon eine IP bei Wikidata gelöscht. Da habe ich nun auch die Cat bei Commons wieder rausgenommen. Gruß & Dank, --PaulT (talk) 14:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Das war ich - irgendwie hat mich wikimedia mal wieder unbemerkt abgemeldet gehabt. Und was so hinter den kulissen läuft, das hat bei Wikipedia immer irgendwie Arbeitskräftemangel. es ist hier in Commons ja auch so. Kersti (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kühbacher Wiese[edit]

Hallo Kersti, die Wiese im Reinhardswald, die du hier: File:155 Weg von der Staufenberghütte zur Kühlbacher Wiese.jpg ff. fotografiert hast, hat den Namen „Kühbacher Wiese“. GeorgDerReisende (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ich dachte ich hätte es richtig abgeschrieben... Kersti (talk) 13:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 17:13, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting category pages[edit]

I know you are a pretty active user, so I just thought I'd pass on something that would be helpful. When you want an empty category removed, don't just blank it: use {{SD|C1}} if the name is invalid, or {{SD|C2}} to delete an empty category without prejudice against future re-creation. When you just blank it, it's likely to sit there for months (sometimes longer) before an admin notices it and actually deletes the page. Thanks in advance. - Jmabel ! talk 18:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Komarof (talk) 07:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2023[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Topographischer Atlas Des Königreichs Hannover und Herzogthums Braunschweig, Blatt 10 - Emden.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Topographischer Atlas Des Königreichs Hannover und Herzogthums Braunschweig, Blatt 10 - Emden.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:06, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]