User talk:Rvalette

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to the Commons, Rvalette!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Manecke 20:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop re-uploading of the same file[edit]

العربية | Deutsch | English | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | svenska | +/− Hi! I noticed you have uploaded one file under the same name some times. Please notice it is not necessary to upload the same file multiple times. It won't change the description! If you want to change the Image's description, please click at the file and then at the [Edit] button above. Commons:Licensing may help you to find a valid license. Thanks,

abf /talk to me/ 20:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello Rvalette!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. — Manecke 13:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Palais de la bourse baromètre 1.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Motopark 15:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Marseille Fort Saint Nicolas demi lune Villeroy.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Motopark 20:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Musées marseillais[edit]

Bonjour ! Pour les reflets, la solution canonique consiste à s'approcher de la vitrine et dans tous les cas où c'est possible, de coller tout ou partie de la lentille avant sur la vitre. Ça élimine une quantité prodigieuse de reflets et ça vous sert de trépied improvisé. Quand on peut appuyer complètement l'objectif à plat sur la vitre, on peut descendre sans problème sous le 1/10e de seconde, voire à 1/5e en prenant 2 ou 3 photos par sécurité. D'ailleurs je note que vous prenez vos photos à 400 ISO, vous pouvez monter à 800 sans trop de problèmes avec un 350D, ce qui vous permettra de fermer davantage et d'avoir une plus grande profondeur de champ.

Pour le nom des fichiers, il n'y a pas moyen de renommer une image sur Commons (c'est un problème connu, mais apparemment ça exige un développement logiciel non négligeable). Il faut donc uploader de nouveau votre image sur Commons avec le nom correct et apposer sur l'ancienne le modèle {{bad name|nom de la nouvelle image}}. Ainsi, l'ancienne sera supprimée par un administrateur (vous pouvez aussi me demander directement :-) ). Je vous conseille personnellement de ne pas utiliser accents ni signes de ponctuation autres que le tiret ou le tiret bas, pour éviter tout problème d'encodage. Si vous avez pris en photo ou noté les descriptifs des objets, peut-être disposez-vous de leur numéro d'accession (ou référence), qui peut être très utile au public académique. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Musée Grobet-Labadié[edit]

A lot of Wikis think that it is a good idea to remove the frames. There is an own catagory for this. You don't like it - so I will leave your pictures untouch. --Marku1988 (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Bouches du Rhône[edit]

Bonjour. Vous n'avez pas à vous excuser, on est tous passé par cette phase et nous sommes aussi ici pour nous entraider.

Les données SRTM et du NGDC et plus généralement celles issues du gouvernement fédéral des USA sont du domaine public. Elles peuvent donc être utilisées sans restriction et il n'est pas obligatoire de les créditer (mais il est toujours bon de citer ses sources). GRASS est un logiciel libre et il n'est pas nécessaire de s'enregistrer pour l'utiliser. Ceci est valable pour la majorité des logiciels libres ou gratuits ; si ce n'est pas le cas, vous le verrez lors du téléchargement ou de l'installation. Les logiciels SIG sont fiables pour nos besoins ici sur WP. GRASS est très complet mais aussi assez compliqué à utiliser et n'existe malheureusement qu'en anglais. Voyez éventuellement sur cette page si vous trouvez un logiciel plus adapté à vos besoins.

Les cartes de géolocalisation suivent de préférence une projection équirectangulaire afin de faciliter le positionnement des points. Pour chaque carte, le méridien et parallèle de référence pour la projection sont ceux du centre de la carte finale afin de réduire les déformations au maximum. Par exemple pour la France cela donne ceci alors qu'en prenant comme référence l'équateur lors de la projection, cela donne cela (et pas Mercator comme indiqué dans le titre). Il est donc important de déterminer les limites géographiques de la carte avant d'effectuer la re-projection. Ceci est la principale différence par rapport aux cartes générales pour lesquelles on recherche plutôt la conformité comme propriété afin de préserver au mieux les formes.

La géoloc au niveau des villes est tout à fait possible, bien que je ne l'aie pas essayée personnellement. Voir par exemple le modèle pour Paris.

Concernant les fichiers SVG, il faut savoir que le moteur de Médiawiki n'affiche pas directement les images vectorielles mais les transforme au préalable en PNG (donc bitmap) pour l'affichage des vignettes, lors de l'insertion dans un article ou sur sa page de description, ceci pour réduire les incompatibilités entre les navigateurs. Je pense que les problèmes de rendu que vous rencontrez viennent de là.

N'hésitez pas si vous avez besoin d'autres éclaircissements. Sting (talk) 15:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Rvalette!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cette image peut être supprimée car le titre est mauvais et j'en ai importée une autreRobert Valette (talk) 15:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Sculpture de Henri Lombard[edit]

Bonjour.

Ce n'est pas moi qui ai ajouté la category:Henri Lombard à l'image File:Siège CL écusson.jpg. Si vous consultez l'historique de l'image, vous verrez que c'est un wikipedien qui l'a ajoutée postérieurement. Je ne suis l'auteur que du cliché, des descriptions fr et en et de l'import dans Commons.

Peut-être a-t-il ajouté la catégorie pour la caryatide en dessous, et pas pour l'écusson (c'est vrai que c'est ambigu, il faudrait préciser). Si vous êtes assez sur de vos infos, n'hésitez pas à compléter ma description. Je pense qu'il est autorisé de citer un auteur comme présumé (à propos de Camille Lefèvre).

Je vois qu'il y a un court article en français et en espagnol sur ce sculpteur qui a notamment oeuvré à Marseille. L'article en espagnol reprend mon image et il est un peu plus complet que celui en français. Comme vous vous intéressez à Marseille, peut être pourriez vous le compléter ?

Sur un sujet qui n'a rien à voir avec le siège du CL, je termine en vous faisant part de mes déboires lors d'import dans Commons d'images d'immeubles récents. Genre les tours de la Défense. La réglementation interdit de publier dans Commons des images d'un immeuble dont l'architecte est mort depuis moins de 70 ans. Il n'y a pas de "FOP" (Freedom of Panorama) en France. Même si l'image est prise depuis un lieu public. Des administrateurs font du ménage régulièrement, surtout sur les images importées directement sur le wikipédia anglais, un peu moins sur commons et encore moins sur celles importées directement sur le wikipédia français.

Bonnes contributions.--Tangopaso (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Puget[edit]

Bonjour ! J'essaierai de passer au Louvre ce week-end, au moins pour la statue extérieure. N'hésitez pas à me rappeler à l'ordre si j'oublie ; je suis assez étourdie. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:09, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bronze_escalier_gare_Saint_Charles_Marseille,_les_fruits.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Parisdreux (d) 09:59, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photos de sculptures[edit]

Bonjour. Pour qu'une photo de sculpture soit sur Commons, il faut à la fois que la sculpture représentée soit dans le domaine public et que la photo soit libre. Si l'œuvre de Valentin Pignol est bien dans le domaine public, sa représentation est reprise d'Artnet, qui mentionne « tous droits réservés ». Il n'y a en revanche aucun problème si vous prenez vous-même une photo de sculpture et la placez sous licence libre. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai malheureusement du faire supprimer toutes les photos de sculpture qui n'était pas de vu, pour la raison mentionnée par Jastrow.--Zolo (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frémin ou Flamen ?[edit]

Bonjour. J'ai répondu a votre question sur ma page de discussion. Olivier2 (talk) 16:22, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Voltaire Jourdan[edit]

Bonjour,

La reproduction photographique de l’aquarelle représentant mon ami Voltaire Jourdan n’a aucun rapport avec le peintre Théodore Jourdan et fait d’ailleurs partie de mes œuvres exposées sur la page Wikimedia Commons : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Marie-Claire_Lef%C3%A9bure

Marie-Claire (talk) 23:31, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Chapiteau ionique de Marseille[edit]

Je fait une revision des chapiteaux antiques pour le placer dans la categorie correcte. J'ai vue votre photo du chapiteau ionique du Musée de Marseille, que vous dites du Ie siecle a.C. dans la description sur la page. Je sais que dans le musée il y a aussi un chapiteau ionique du VIe a.C. et le chapiteau dans la photo me semble avoir rien de romain: purrait-il etre celui du VIe? C'est pour le classer dans la categorie Category:Ancient Greek Ionic capitals et pas dans la categorie Category:Ancient Roman Ionic capitals. (Je m'excuse pour mes erreurs d'ortographe: je parle français mais je n'ai jamais appris à l'ecrire bien). MM (talk) 10:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pardonnez-moi: je voi que l'autre chapiteu du VIe est aussi dans les photos du musée et que vous avez raison. Vous avez pas besoin de vous deranger a me repondre. MM (talk) 10:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chabaud-Napoléon III.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chabaud-Napoléon III.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Chabaud-Napoléon III.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 20:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Girodet-Trioson - Portrait de Giuseppe Fravrega.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

--Jarekt (talk) 20:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Gondard[edit]

Hello. Are you able to re-upload picture of sculptures by Paul Gondard with a copyright waiver please? I would really like to add them to this page I've created. Unfortunately, I no longer live in France, so I can't do it myself. Please leave a message on my talkpage when you've managed to do it. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your description!--Oursana (talk) 10:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo du Buste de Zosime[edit]

Bonjour, vous proposez une photo du buste de Zosime (Buste Zosimos.jpg) sur Commons qui m'intéresse au plus haut point, puisque je suis en train de reprendre l'article de WP sur l'alchimiste gréco-égyptien Zosime de Panopolis, ayant vécu vers 300 en Égypte. Zosime était un nom commun et il existe de nombreux personnages ayant porté ce nom. Avez-vous des informations supplémentaires sur ce buste? je crois déchiffrer Ζωσιμε Χρησ..εχ ?? Cordialement Pancrat (talk) 07:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In File:Louis Majorelle-Bureau de dame nénuphar.jpg you have the {{Artwork}} field artist set to {{Creator:Fernand Khnopff}}. Shouldn't this instead be {{Creator:Louis Majorelle}}? In other words, is this file a photo of a desk by Louis Majorelle, or a photo of a painting by Fernand Khnopff that depicts a desk? —RP88 (talk) 22:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you give a good source for this image. This image is not typical for a Adriaen van der Kabel, so I want to check what the source says. Thanks. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 18:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 09:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 09:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lempereur-Oudry-La Fontaine-L'âne et ses maîtres.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 00:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dans cette image il y a une erreur: Le champ XII - XIIIe siècle doit être JAUNE, le champ XIVe siècle doit être ROSÉ. Salutations, --Quinbus Flestrin (talk) 10:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Il n'y a pas d'erreur dans cette image, les légendes sont correctes : j'ai vérifié dans le livre Provence romane tome 1 écrit en grande partie par M. Rouquette (cf page 456), à moins que l'erreur soit dans le schéma du livre, dans ce cas cela dépasse ma modeste compétenceRobert Valette (talk) 15:54, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

illustration de Saint-Victor de Marseille[edit]

Bonjour ! Comme cela a été signalé par divers intervenants, dans cette discussion, dans l'article en français, dans celui en allemand, etc., ton illustration, par ailleurs d'une grande qualité technique, est effectivement erronée. Il faudrait inverser sur la légende les couleurs jaune et rose. La salle principale, avec les colonnes, en jaune sur ton plan, est une reconstruction du 13e siècle. Le choeur est du 14e siècle. Ma source : l'audio-guide de l'église Saint-Victor, que tu peux écouter sur leur site (http://www.saintvictor.net/Visite-audioguide-La-basilique.html#) en cliquant sur la pastille n° 1, on te le dira au bout d'une minute et demie. Et puis c'est confirmé en de multiples endroits par le texte même de l'article de Wikipédia, qui souligne par exemple que le choeur date d'Urbain V, du 14e siècle, donc. Le livre qui t'a servi de source est sans doute fautif. Il serait bien sûr préférable que cette illustration soit corrigée, et qui, mieux que toi... Amicalement Aluminium (talk) 21:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ajouter le nom latin et la catégorie des oiseaux?[edit]

Bonjour et merci pour les belles images dans la catégorie Category:Histoire des oiseaux par François-Nicolas Martinet, mais elles seront difficiles à retrouver je crains. On pourrait ajouter le nom latin et la catégorie spécifique pour chacune des images immédiatement pendant le téléchargement? Salut et merci, Hansmuller (talk) 12:18, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Catégorie des oiseaux[edit]

bonjour, Les images de la Category:Histoire des oiseaux par François-Nicolas Martinet datent de 1790-1796, période où l'identification des oiseaux n'était pas précise et a été largement revue depuis. Il est donc difficile de trouver le nom latin de chaque oiseau, sauf pour un spécialiste. Je le ferai mais seulement pour les espèces très courantes et facilement identifiable, pour les autres il faudrait qu'un spécialiste ( que je ne suis pas) le fasse. Cordialement Robert Valette (talk) 13:36, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

une explication svp[edit]

Bonjour, ici : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vase_en_forme_de_chien.jpg, ça veut dire quoi exactement, "vase plastique" ? Je le comprends au féminin vu que c'est clairement pas au masculin.
Si c'est bien ça, je pense que l'utilisation de ce terme est en l'occurrence inadéquate et donc maladroite parce qu'il n'est pas utilisé ici dans l'acceptation la plus générale du terme (et de loin !), ce qui fait que ça renvoie les photos qui font partie de ces catégories dans un cul-de-sac en ce qui concerne la recherche : qui va penser à chercher une categ de "plastique" dans ce contexte, à part les rares initiés qui ont fait les pages ? Ça ramène d'ailleurs à ce qu'en dit et répète l'article fr:Art plastiques : imprécise et élitiste, c'est-à-dire tout le contraire d'une catégorisation intelligente. De plus en anglais (en:Plastic arts), pour certains ça inclut aussi la poésie (bien qu'à ce niveau ça se présente assez clairement comme du chipotage intellectuel), autrement dit ça sort vraiment du sujet.
Si on tient absolument à une telle catégorie, je ne vois pas non plus pourquoi il n'a pas été fait usage du mot "artistic/artistique", qui le remplacerait avantageusement : c'est nettement plus commun, dans le sens noble du mot "commun", et il me semble nettement plus approprié.
Mais ce ne serait pas plus intelligent pour autant. Car vu la définition Merriam-Webster de "plastic arts : art (such as sculpture or bas-relief) characterized by modeling : three-dimensional art ", il faudrait que toutes les photos de statues, vases, etc, soient dans cette categ. Ce qui est franchement absurde.
Bon, j'ai peut-être mal compris. Alors, à quoi ça correspond exactement ? Merci pour une réponse. Cordialement, Pueblopassingby (talk) 17:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci Rvalette pour l'explication - et le lien vers l'article de vase si intéressant et si mal-nommé, dont commentaire dans la pdd ad hoc. Bonne continuation. Pueblopassingby (talk) 18:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image Permission[edit]

Dear Rvalette,
I am currently redacting my compiled course notes into a book named "History of Interior Design and Furniture” which will be in Turkish language and will be distributed in Turkey. It is a cultural and educational reference book. I would like to use your image which belongs to your copyrights and I reach from the link below,

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Louis_Majorelle-Vitrine_biblioth%C3%A8que_n%C3%A9nuphar.jpg
I will appreciate if you let me know your terms and conditions for the image's usage permission. Your name will be indicated at the end of the book in the photo credits part. And how do you prefer to use your name in the credits part?

Yours Sincerely
Prof. Arch. Mustafa Demirkan
mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com
--Mustidede (talk) 14:53, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Magpies in fables has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 09:47, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tour du Roy René[edit]

Bonjour, Je suis enseignant dans un collège de Marseille (13e) et je prépare actuellement un travail de dessin et impression 3D de la Tour du Roy René avec mes élèves. Le dessin en coupe de la tour que vous avez publié (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Saint-Jean_Plans_007.jpg) est particulièrement intéressant et il semblerait qu'il était accompagné à l'origine par d'autres planches. Pourriez-vous m'indiquer s'il vous plaît où est-ce que je pourrais retrouver ces dessins ? Vous remerciant par avance pour votre aide, Cordialement P. COLLET — Preceding unsigned comment added by P-collet (talk • contribs) 17:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
En réponse à votre demande je peux simplement vous préciser que la coupe de la tour Saint-Jean est extraite d'un dossier en date du 20.12.1821 intitulé "Atlas des bâtiments militaires, service du génie, Direction de Toulon". Je n'ai pas d'autres photos, mais vous pourrez consulter ce dossier aux archives départementales des Bouches-du-Rhône : il porte la référence suivante : 2J20/3. Si d'autres plans ou coupes vous intéresse, vous pourrez prendre des photos.
Bon courage.
Robert Valette (talk) 07:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Œuvres de Michel Serre / Vue de l'hôtel de Ville / Vue du cours / HD[edit]

Bonjour,

Je suis le secrétaire de rédaction du mensuel marseillais CQFD (cqfd-journal.org) et pour notre prochain numéro que nous bouclons ce week-end, nous sommes à la recherche de version HD (imprimables, 300 ppp) de deux tableaux du peintre Michel Serre conservés au musée des Beaux-Arts de Marseille : "Vue de l'hôtel de ville de Marseille pendant le peste de 1720" et "Vue du Cours pendant la peste de 1720". Vu que vous avez mis en ligne sur les Commons de Wikimedia des reproductions basse résolution de ces deux œuvres, je me demandais si vous auriez par devers vous des versions en haute résolution. Et le cas échéant, si vous seriez d'accord pour nous les transmettre. Nous nous sommes adressés à la réunion des musées nationaux mais ils en demandent malheureusement un tarif bien au dessus de nos moyens.

Merci de votre attention, Clair Rivière (clairriviere@gmail.com) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juancarlosdelamancha (talk • contribs) 15:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contact pour autorisation[edit]

Bonjour Rvalette,

J'aurais besoin d'entrer en contact avec vous afin d'obtenir votre permission pour l'utilisatin d'une de vos photos (j'ai bien lu la license mais mon organisation requiert une permission nominative). Y a t'il un endroit où vous écrire?

Je vous remercie par avance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fanette Brandalac (talk • contribs) 15:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Fanette,

Vous pouvez m'écrire à mon adresse mail rvalette@numericable.fr Cordialement --Robert Valette (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Affiche d'Alibert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 10:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cot-Sainte Elisabeth de Hongrie soignant les malades.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Spacesheep1 (talk) 10:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Méditerranée-Botinelly.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


File:Reyer-Gondard.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Clay.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 00:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Gondard est mort en 1953, donc il y a plus de 70 ansRobert Valette (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marseille,Augustins09,St Augustin Raymond Servian.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Clay.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 14:56, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond Servian est mort en 1953, donc il y a plus de 70 ans.Robert Valette (talk) 07:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]