User talk:Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv/2007-2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image Tagging Image:KaninchenKontakt.GIF[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KaninchenKontakt.GIF. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Denniss 00:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KaninchenMitJungen.GIF[edit]

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. Denniss 00:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mist, da muß ich echt meinen schlechte Tag gehabt haben. Ich habe das jetzt ergänzt. Kersti 03:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ardennerpäerd.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 13:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This I dont understand. The autor of the picture wrote: Lizenz:Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 - To me this seems to be enough. Kersti 14:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Freiberger.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 14:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Helper[edit]

Hallo Kersti, kurz am Rande: Commons Helper ist ein tolles Werkzeug zum einfachne und lizenzkonformen Übertragen von Dateien. Grüße, --Polarlys 15:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh danke - als ich die Anleitungen gelesen habe stand noch da, so etwas gäbe es nicht. Kersti 15:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Betr.: Image:SuffolkPunchDraftHorses.jpg[edit]

Halloo ! Weshalb hast du die einzige Kategorie dieses Bildes entfernt ? Versehen ? Bitte repariere es wieder. Danke. Gruß. --Peng 10:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, es war absicht. In der Bildbeschreibung ist die Rasse angegeben, deshalb habe ich es in die Galerie der Rasse eingefügt und aus Horses und Equus caballus gelöscht. Außerdem ist das Bild noch ein zweites Mal in der übersicht über die Pferderassen angeführt - es ist deshalb von der Kategorie Horses aus gut genug zu finden. Kersti 13:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hier ist noch nicht entschieden, ob Bilder in Galerien oder Kategorien sortiert werden sollen. Aber was anderes: Kannst du bitte für die Bilder einen NowCommons-Baustein (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:NowCommons) auf de.wp setzen, so dass der Admin (vulgo: mein Job) einen einfachen Überblick hat? Alternativ muss ich mit einem externen Tool mir die Duplikate ausgeben lassen. Grüße, --Polarlys 19:52, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ich bin meine Beobachtungsliste noch mal durchgegangen und habe das für die Bilder nachgetragen, wo es noch fehlte. Kersti 11:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kleiner Hinweis: Bild-auf-den-Commons.png bitte durch den Dateinamen ersetzen ;) Grüße, --Polarlys 19:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh Scheiße ... ich habe die Namen nicht geändert. Kersti 19:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

category:Chimera[edit]

Hi, why are you removing category:Chimera from pictures such as Image:Bellerophon Chimaera BM D205.jpg? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because I put it in es Category, wich ist in Category Chimera. Kersti 22:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Pegasus shouldn't be included in category:chimera because you can have representations of Pegasus without any chimera whatsoever, see for instance Image:Pegaz Opera Poznań.jpg or Image:Pegasus Lequesne Palais Garnier.jpg. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK - but I think, Wings are part of a Bird? Kersti 22:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Why do you ask? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Simple Logic - if a Chimera is an animal with body parts of varius animals, the Pegasus has bodyparts of two animals: bird wings and horse body. Therefore its a chimera. But maybe it is no good idea to think this way in mytology because no one will understand. Kersti 23:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see what you mean. Point is, your definition isn't quite right. The mythological Chimera is a monster which was made of the parts of various animals, but not any animals. From a biological point of view, a chimera is an organism with genetically distinct cells, which doesn't mean distinct body parts. More generally, Pegasus is a mythological creature, so it seems rather pointless to apply to it a biological category different from the mythological meaning. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 23:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah - I understand. Kersti 23:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ASD.jpg[edit]

You removed the category from this image, without replacing it. I don't think this is wise. If you have a view on this, please explain. --Ekko 13:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry I accidently wrote Echocardiography instead of Category:Echocardiography - Kersti 17:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Horses vs. Equus caballus[edit]

Hello,

I think that Commons should be language neutral, if possible. So using the Latin name is the best solution, in this case. Regards, Yann 18:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this has absolutely nothing to do with my Question:
If you look in Category:Domesticated animals you will see, that for all the main domesticated animals like sheep, dogs, cats, horses there is a Category in english as well which has a link to the latin category. - I think, somehow it would be better to use the latin names but in this case Commons doesn't work like this and it wasn't my decision.
But that is not the problem - Horses is Subcategory of Equus caballus and Equus caballus is subcategory of Horses so that everyone should find the other one if he found one of these categorys. Additionally every Subcatecory is listed in th main gallery Equus caballus which is in both categorys. Therefore there is no reason to put a Picture in the main category if it is in a subcategory of one of both.
Kersti 04:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The travellers meeting with Minatarre indians 0026v.jpg[edit]

Could you look at Image:The travellers meeting with Minatarre indians 0026v.jpg? Your edit does not seem to make sense. Regards, Jan Arkesteijn 17:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not - There is a horse on it - and I will look on the pictures of native Americans with their horses again, when I have them all in Equus caballus (=horses) and think, which is the best subcategory of horses, to put them in. Kersti 17:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But you also tried to add a link in the date-line of the infobox. Didn't you? Jan Arkesteijn 17:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't - if there is one that's a fault: sometimes if I try to uses the Buttons to make a wikilink something like this happens - and I don't always notice it. Kersti 18:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Police horses and "recreational riding"[edit]

Hello. I notice you changed a category on Image:PigeonTownSteppers07SousaphoneHorses.jpg from "Horse riding" to "Recreational riding". The police are on horseback as part of their duties, so I do not think it is "recreational". Perhaps you could create a "police horses" category or something similiar for such cases? In the mean time, I reverted as the previous category seems more accurate. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 02:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did't notice it was the police - a bit dark this photo. Than I'll put it in the gallery Mounted police Kersti

Feld und Flur[edit]

Hi Kersti, per Beobachtungsliste bekomme ich mit, dass Du gelegentlich Pferde und Gänse und was sonst so kreucht und fleucht genauer kategorisierst, vielen Dank. Als Dankeschön anbei ein neues Pferdebild vom Wochenende, das ich mangels Ahnung unspezifisch unter "cat:horses" einsortiert habe; vielleicht hast ja wieder eine bessere Zuordnung. Gruß --Lienhard Schulz 13:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mudchute Park and Farm[edit]

I will try and find out which breeds they are. I also have more photos to upload - and some noises :) Secretlondon 18:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Native Americans[edit]

Hello,

w:Native Americans is an ambiguous term, and Category:Native Americans is categorized in Category:America. So, I have logically understood the subject of this category as the one of w:Indigenous peoples of the Americas (the more general sense).

Notice also that Category:Ethnic groups by country is expected to contain only categories which the general form is:

Category:Ethnic groups in COUNTRY
COUNTRY must be the name of an independant country of the current world.

--Juiced lemon 17:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check out discussion page[edit]

See comments on discussion page of Talk:Horse coat colors. Montanabw 21:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Albinokatze.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Albinokatze.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Polarlys 12:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Der Beweis sollte eigentlich auf der Seite stehen, wo das Bild herstammt. Da steht zumindest etwas, was ich für dasselbe halte. Kersti 04:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe gesucht, doch nichts gefunden. Dafür: „Articles from Blackwell Online Open are provided here courtesy of

Blackwell Publishing“ „Copyright © 2006 The Authors, Journal compilation © 2006 International Society for Animal Genetics“. Grüße, --Polarlys 14:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Es steht im ersten Abschnitt des Textes dort, da wo auch Überschrift, Autoren, Erscheinungsjahr und so stehen.
"Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation."
Kersti 21:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Image:Brown and black horse.JPG[edit]

If I knew the breed I'd have mentioned it. I am sure somebody sooner or later will identify them.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am shure that won't happen, because a lot of horse breeds are closely related so that you can`t distinguish them just by looking on them. Kersti 00:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:Pferde Horses in stable2.jpg, Image:Pferd Horse1.jpg[edit]

All right but I need a couple of time till I know the breed of the horses. --Magellan @_/" 11:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, perhaps the Gidran stud is the breed of the horses but at the moment I don´t know 100%. The Lipizzaner stud is there too. .. --Magellan @_/" 12:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Reidquarter.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Reidquarter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--KingFanel 10:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing categories[edit]

Hi, please do not remove categories from images for no reason. Sherurcij 00:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was not for "No reason" - The picture is in the gallery "Pit pony" which is in Category:Horse transport wich is in Category:Use of horses which is in Category:Horses. Additionally there is a link in the gallery Equus caballus leading to Pit pony - therefore Horses is a supercat and is not needed.
Additionally "Pit pony" is in the Category:Mining - that means this category is not needed for this picture too.
There are more than thousand horse-photos in subcats of Category:Horses and Category:Equus caballus - we can't list them all in the main category!
Kersti 20:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but pages do not trump categories - it should still be listed under category: pit ponies, at least. I'll make the change Sherurcij 05:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cabalo semental. Sigueiro. Oroso. Galiza 3.jpg[edit]

I feel it. I don't know the breed--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 20:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Birdcatcherspot.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It schould be OK now. --Kersti 00:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Falklandwolf Dusicyon culpaeus.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 21:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I addet it, but it seems to jump back if you forget to chose the image before pressing "Upload" --Kersti 21:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Image:Noniusz mezohegyes.jpg[edit]

Dear Kersti!

I don't know why should I stop reverting your edits, because I haven't started doing that. I'm an administrator on hungarian wikipedia, and I deleted commons clashes from there. This picture was not categorized so I put it into one , as it requested. I know nothing about horses so it was the best choice for me. Pilgab 10:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Equus caballus[edit]

Bonjour,

Connaissant votre intérêt pour la race chevaline, pourriez-vous m'aider à déterminer la race des chevaux figurant sur la photographie suivante: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Roly_-_Equus_caballus_JPG.jpg Merci d'avance.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 13:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:W.b..jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:W.b..jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 85.182.123.53 04:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am the wrong one to ask - only en:User:Drfighar could know. –--Kersti (talk) 10:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 1df4d47f04f411c6af4d6a8235643bde[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! 1df4d47f04f411c6af4d6a8235643bde


Image Tagging Image:Saddleseat Power Trot.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Saddleseat Power Trot.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Herby talk thyme 10:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it specifies the Uploader and the Creator. For the rest, ask Montabw. -Kersti (talk) 11:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
::Why was this photo marked for Flickr review, Flickr was nor mentioned as source! --Kersti (talk) 00:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TrechusCoarctatus.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:10, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Criollo_horse21.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Criollo_horse21.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

howcheng {chat} 18:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading from flickr[edit]

Could you use this tool which automatically uploads the largest image and adds a review that the image is free? Yuval Y § Chat § 22:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, this makes it much easyer! --Kersti (talk) 01:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:KOYNIS_XRISTOS.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KOYNIS_XRISTOS.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Image description states that the image was taken by a friend, so we'd need OTRS verification that said friend allows it to be published freely. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


As I said, the image's description on flickr states that it was NOT taken by the flickr uploader. That means we don't have permission. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Colourpoint[edit]

Hello. I have realised I made a confusion and had started to remove the non albinotic animals. Thanks for this explanation because it's not always clearely indicated in documents about colorpoint animals and it took time to me to be sure that colorpoint colors can't be leucistic. Howerver, please could you explain to me how do the darker shaded points occured in leucistic horses for exemple (doted, triped and spoted animals , ok, but shades points?)--Salix (talk) 21:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, I understand much better. Tell me if it's not true: Colourpointed cats are albinotics but some melanin can come in the coldest parts of the body, "colourpointed" horses have white fur but you can see there black skin through the shortest hair. Why this sentense: "An animal whith white blood would die long before birth within the first weeks of pregnancy"? Albonotics have red blood and anybody would die without Hemoglobin, no? --Salix (talk) 21:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That is, what I wanted to say. --Kersti (talk) 22:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok^^. Thanks. --Salix (talk) 23:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Antwort auf deine Frage vom 28. Gruß --Túrelio (talk) 13:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konji-Zeljko.JPG[edit]

Kersti, ich habe mit den Tierärzten aus Crikvenica gesprochen die diese Pferde betreuen. Diese Pferdeherden leben fast vollständig frei im Hinterland von Novi Vinodolski und außer einer großen Anzahl der kroatische Rasse "hrvatski hladnokrvnjak" (kroatischer Kaltblüter) gibt es auch andere Rassen und da die Rassenmischung nicht unter fachmännischer Aufsicht steht, kann man nicht mit Sicherheit sagen, ob auf dem Foto reinrassige kroatische Kaltblüter gebildet sind, denn das könnte nur Fachmann vor Ort sagen und deshalb habe ich auch keine präzisere Beschreibung der Rasse eingetragen. Es tut mir leid, dass ich nicht mehr helfen konnte, außer mit der Beschreibung, dass es ein großes Vergnügen ist, diesen Pferden beim freien Herumlaufen und Weiden in den Bergen zuzusehen. Schöne Grüße :-) --Roberta F. (talk) 10:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dartmoor Pony.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review


File:UsHorseBreeds.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:UsHorseBreeds.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Ww2censor (talk) 23:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv. You have new messages at ww2censor's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 22:45, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danke[edit]

für diese Korrektur. Mit den Cat stehe ich auch nach einem Jahr immer mal wieder auf Kriegsfuß. Herzliche Grüße, --3268zauber (talk) 22:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nun ja - die kategorien, die ich selbst angelegt habe, habe ich noch so ungefähr im kopf, aber sonst? ;-) --Kersti (talk) 22:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wieso hatte ich jetzt spontan den Eindruck, dass da jemand sein Licht ganz gewaltig unter den Scheffel stellt? ;) GN(8), --3268zauber (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nur weil Du nicht weißt, wie viele Kategorien ich selbst angelegt habe. --Kersti (talk) 22:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wieso ich dachte immer, aller guten Dinge wären drei, d. h. ab vier wird es spannend! ;) --3268zauber (talk) 22:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe mehrere hundert Kategorien angelegt. --Kersti (talk) 22:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Siehste, hatte ich doch recht! ;) Herzliche Grüße, --3268zauber (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galapagos hawk.jpg[edit]

File:Galapagos hawk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Leoboudv (talk) 02:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kanadagänse[edit]

Hallo Kersti,

war diese Version vom Bild File:Swarm of Canada geese in winter.jpg vom 27. Mai 10:10 ein Versehen oder ein Scherz (Sieht eher nach Blässhuhn aus)?

So ganz praktisch, da ich noch nicht so viel Erfahrung habe, habe ich die Frage, wieso das Bild nicht mehr auf meinem Account Kalima, wo ich es hochgeladen habe, in der Galerie erscheint.

Und zum Schluss: Das Bild wurde in der Dämmerung aufgenommen. Da ist wohl keine Tageslichtqualität herstellbar.Danke für die Bearbeitung.

Grüße--Kalima (talk) 11:50, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Die zwischenversion war ein Versehen und es handelt sich um einer Version einer Bleistiftzeichnung irgendeines Forschers, der eine flugunfähige Ralle von irgendeiner Insel gezeichnet hat - leider weiß ich nicht mehr wer es war und welche Insel und welcher Vogel es war, also kann man gerade mit diesem gemeinfreien Bild nichts anfangen. --Kersti (talk) 12:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Kersti PK,
war schon etwas komisch, aber immerhin habe ich eine Ralle erkannt:). Ugs. nennt man Blässrallen auch Blässhühner. Und weshalb wird das Bild nicht mehr auf dem Account Kalima angezeigt, auf dem es hochgeladen wurde? Liegt das an den neuen Versionen? Grüße--Kalima (talk) 13:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Das weiß ich auch nicht. vielleicht ist das Galerie-Tool einfach zu blöd um sich zu merken, wer ein Bild zuerst hochgeladen hat und gibt immer nur den Hochlader der aktuellen Version an. --Kersti (talk) 18:09, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Albinism[edit]

Not sure what you're trying to say. But animals with patches of white are always called partial albinos; they are not the same as leucistic individuals, and need to be distinguished from them! - MPF (talk) 21:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's some illustrations I've done to indicate an albino, a partial albino, and leucism, using standard nomenclature:
Original (USFWS illustration)
Albino
Partial albino - pure white patches
Leucistic - uniformly pale
the last two are NOT the same!! - MPF (talk) 21:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but what they write is simply wrong.
If you look in new scientific articles about color genetics you won't find the expression "partial albino" for spottet birds because they are leucistic - whatever there are called sometimes. Scientific research about color genetic revealed a lot of new facts about genetics in the last few decades and researchers, who studied thirty years ago would have learned the expression "partial albinism" and because of the fact that mammals are researched much more thorrowly than birds, researchers who concentrate on different facts about birds, may not know that the expression "partial albino" for spotted birds is simply wrong.
Hein van Grouw: Not every white bird is an albino: sense and nonsense about colour aberrations in birds. Dutch Birding, vol. 28, no. 2, 2006 Page 79 - 89
This article is not perfect, because in Humans the Brown-gene is OCA3 and dilution genes are some kind of partial albinism, but it is the best review article about birds, I found up to now.
If you know german read the german wikipedia articles about de:Albinismus and de:Leuzismus they are much better than their english pendants.
If you look in en:Leucism you can read there, that EDNRB is a leucim Locus. In this schentific article you can read that it is responsible for some kind of spotting.
  • Miwa M, Inoue-Murayama M, Aoki H, Kunisada T, Hiragaki T, Mizutani M, Ito S: Endothelin receptor B2 (EDNRB2) is associated with the panda plumage colour mutation in Japanese quail. Anim Genet. 2007 Apr;38(2):103-8. Epub 2007 Feb 22. PMID 17313575</ref>
--Kersti (talk) 06:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Kersti Nebelsiek as an experienced field ornithologist (conceited birdwatcher) I've read many articles on this subject written by real ornithologists. The third bird is definitely leucistic. We love to use the word to impress the newbies. --Droll (talk)

Solid red cat[edit]

The gene coding red color is completely different that the one coding tabby and solid. Solid red cats often have ghost tabby marks but are genetically solids. You can see solid red cats photographies here.--Abujoy (talk) 22:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not completly sure but if I understand correctly, the only important information in the article A domestic cat X chromosome linkage map and the sex-linked orange locus: mapping of orange, multiple origins and epistasis over nonagouti is "Furthermore, epistasis of orange over nonagouti was demonstrated at the genetic level." So, the orange gene is dominant over nonagouti but I didn't read that orange gene is recessive under agouti. I'm sorry my genetic notions are really poor so if I misunderstand, tell me please. --Abujoy (talk) 12:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The relevant part of the article which is easyest to understand ist the text at the cat photos
Nonagouty is another name for a - the agouti-allele which is responsible for the solid black color. The sentence "Furthermore, epistasis of orange over nonagouti was demonstrated at the genetic level." means that the color of cats with the orange gene isn't affected by the nonagouti-allele. --Kersti (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok! Thank you for the explanation. I have to uncategorized Category:Solid red cats now and do redirect or something like that.--Abujoy (talk) 17:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 17:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crax globulosa (Wattled Curassow).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

File:SillaCatherwood.jpg[edit]

Hello. I undid your edit to File:SillaCatherwood.jpg. Chiapas is in Mexico, not Cuba. Thank you. Infrogmation (talk) 05:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I changed it accordingly. Kersti (talk) 11:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−

It has been found that Image:Gili trawangan mm cidomo.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted! Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 23:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Skyros pony.jpg[edit]

This image you uploaded is not entirely free as it has a ND or 'No-Derivative' restriction. It may be deleted one day if someone files a DR on it since it failed flickreview. Maybe you can get the flickr owner to license it as either cc by or cc by sa. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now the license is changed accordingly. Kersti (talk) 23:20, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
:-( This is why I am absolutely happy, that there is a Flickr-upload-bot which chooses the correct license for me now. Kersti (talk) 12:59, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I never learned how to use the upload bot but that is OK. I just wonder if anyone will ever use my high resolution images on my userpage. Anyway, I have a few contacts on ancient Egyptian art like these which is my specialty. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arabian vs. American Shetland[edit]

Ok, I have no idea how this happened (maybe a Flickr search failure?), but as it is, I'm nominating a picture uploaded by you as "American Shetland pony" to be removed as a relatively low-quality, redundant image of a grazing chestnut Arabian gelding. If you're interested, the deletion request page is here. Pitke (talk) 10:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This might explain the tags on the Flickr page btw 9v9 Pitke (talk) 10:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are right in what you wrote - it is an Arabian. I uploadet hundrets of Flickr horse photos an you are the first one who seems to control every single one. Therefore you will find every fault I made and didn't notice myself. --Kersti (talk) 03:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, just wanted to make sure. Pitke (talk) 12:02, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Sorry for the interruption but I find it strange that Pitke uploads images using .png format. Jpeg is always better because you then often get some metadata. Most people upload images using jpeg (.jpg) format if possible. PNG images also upload slower than JPEG files I notice. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try and remember this. I often use PNG when I have to modify the picture since my software has PNG as default for other purposes. I've believed that even when saving at full quality, every time a JPEG file is modified, it loses data, resulting in the ugly JPEG grain. Pitke (talk) 12:02, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eye candy[edit]

Hi, I just uploaded these two. Please pop by and see if there's something you would change about the way I'm calling the colours. Pitke (talk) 00:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Uploaded several pics of this guy - Leopard gene is involved - for the rest I don't really know, but there are some additional spotting genes.
    Uploaded several pics of this guy - Leopard gene is involved - for the rest I don't really know, but there are some additional spotting genes.
  • I would think this is a roan dun too.
    I would think this is a roan dun too.

So you have nothing to say on "chestnut varnish roan sabino tobiano" then? Pitke (talk) 03:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not when I first looked on the horse. Now I think it is really the best explanation for the color of this horse. Kersti (talk) 13:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. Pitke (talk) 11:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anglo-Normanne.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Cleveland Bay.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cleveland Bay.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Dana boomer (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Attelage en double paire.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Attelage en double paire.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Attelage en double paire.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Dana boomer (talk) 15:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:Marko 244.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marko 244.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Marko 244.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Dana boomer (talk) 02:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reconfirm votes at Commons:Valued image candidates/Adonis-microcarpa001.jpg[edit]

User:Lycaon changed the scope by adding the English popular name. Please reconfirm your votes at Commons:Valued image candidates/Adonis-microcarpa001.jpg. MathKnight 15:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2009-07-05-Vivat-Viadukt.ogg[edit]

Hallo, hast Du Dir das Video überhaupt angesehen, bevor Du fast alle Kategorien, die übrigens nur zum Teil von mir stammen, gestrichen hast? Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 20:17, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Die Kategorien sahen so zufällig aus .... war wohl ein irrtum Meinerseits. --Kersti (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Vatican City[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Vatican City has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Teofilo (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weidegängiges Pferd.JPG[edit]

Hallo Kersti, eine Frage an Dich als Pferdeexpertin. Ist es möglich anhand des Bildes die Rasse zu bestimmen? Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nein das funktioniert normalerweise nicht. Kersti (talk) 21:00, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Info. --4028mdk09 (talk) 21:03, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ausnahmen sind wenn nur Fiordpferde, daneben kann man die Rasse bestimmen wenn nur sehr wenige Rassen zur Auswahl stehen (z.B. Wenn ein Photo auf einem gestüt gemacht wurde, das eine Warmblutrasse, eine Kaltblutrasse und eine Ponyrasse züchtet, kann man sagen, was man davon auf dem Bild sieht.) oder das Brandzeichen zu erkennen ist. Kersti (talk) 21:07, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn Initiativen gegen Brandzeichen (wie zur Zeit des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz) erfolgreich sind, wird das als Erkennungsmerkmal in absehbarer Zeit wegfallen. --4028mdk09 (talk) 21:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Deliboz2.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Deliboz2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Deliboz2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rubin16 (talk) 07:38, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revert[edit]

Hallo, warum hast Du die Cat wieder gelöscht? --4028mdk09 (talk) 17:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weil es unüblich ist, eine kategorie und ihre Übergeordnete Kategorie in einem Bild zu haben. Beim in Unterkategorien einsortieren geht es unter anderem darum, die Hauptkategorie leerer zu bekommen. Kersti (talk) 21:10, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Verstehe ich nicht ganz, da neben Küken auf dem Bild doch auch ein Altvogel zu sehen ist. Und den kann ich nach Deinem Revert unter der von Dir als Hauptkategorie bezeichneten dann nicht finden und bei den Jungtieren würde ich ihn nicht suchen. --4028mdk09 (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Foals at the side of their working mother[edit]

You are a mindreader! :D Pitke (talk) 05:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palila_on_Mamane_Tree.jpg[edit]

File:Palila_on_Mamane_Tree.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

J Milburn (talk) 00:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Schleier" für Pferde[edit]

Hallo Kersti, Frage an Dich als Pferdefachfrau: wie nennt man diese "Schleier" aus Troddeln, die man Pferden (zum Schutz vor Fliegen?) vor das Gesicht hängt? Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 19:30, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keine Ahnung. Kersti (talk) 00:09, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh great goddess of image-finding[edit]

Kersti, I have resurrected an article on en. wiki on Moorlands Totilas but have utterly failed in finding a free image (all the CC stuff on Flickr is tagged for non-commercial use only). Can you use your considerable skill to find a free image we can use for the article and if so, pop it in? If you can, then Thank you, Danke, Merci and Gracias! Montanabw (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Lithuanian Heavy Draught Horse.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lithuanian Heavy Draught Horse.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Lithuanian Heavy Draught Horse.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Dana boomer (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a link in the source section, but it doesn't go to anything to do with the LHD - definitely no photo. I did a quick google search and couldn't find any UN-FAO site with this image. Did I miss something? If not, please restore the tag. Dana boomer (talk) 03:54, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kersti - I see that you tweaked the image a little bit, but there's still no valid source. The web link does not take you to the image, and it needs to for the tags to be valid. Are you planning to fix this or should I retag? Dana boomer (talk) 14:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beitrag zur fauna Centralpolynesiens Ornithologie der Viti, Samoa und Tonga Inseln[edit]

Yes.I will write proper descriptions and other categories once I have checked the synonymies. Thanks for the reminder.This is long overdue. Notafly (talk) 21:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jappalang (talk) 04:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kersti, the two files are listed in the deletion request linked above. Jappalang (talk) 00:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kersti, the deletion request is linked via the "their entry" in the notification above. The files are listed there. The other uploader has replied in the request and has no problems seeing the listed files. If you have problems in locating/seeing the listed files in the deletion request, please contact an administrator as it would then seem to be a system issue on your end. Jappalang (talk) 01:10, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image question[edit]

Hi Kersti - Did you take the image File:Fris.jpg? If so, could you add something like "I, User:Kersti Nebelsiek, am the author of this image." to it? Currently, it has no author information and so is in danger of being deleted. Thanks! Dana boomer (talk) 15:07, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not the author. The Author is an "Eelco R" from polish wikipedia I think, but I simply forgot - that must have been one of the first photos I transferred from other Wikipedias to Commons. - Kersti (talk) 15:14, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't blank pages[edit]

Hi Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Rallidae eggs on Commons. If you meant for the page to be deleted, blanking the page is not the right way to do this. A simple real-world comparison to illustrate: You removed the entire text of a page from a thick folder, but the then empty, useless page itself remained in the folder.

Please use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regularly for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed.

For redirects use #REDIRECT[[Target]] or {{category redirect|Targetcategoryname}}. For more information please read Blanking. Thanks again. –Krinkletalk 01:55, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

no, its simply a fault I corrected a second later. --Kersti (talk) 01:56, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, Thanks. –Krinkletalk 02:13, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kersti_Nebelsiek/Archiv/2007-2010&oldid=70286097"