User talk:Jakubhal/Archives/January 2022 - December 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives: September 2011, December 2015, September 2016, April 2017, September 2017, April 2018, October 2018, March 2019, September 2019, March 2020, July 2020, December 2020, December 2021

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Bogumiła Delimata La Bogusha - A Través del Humo - 20210710 1707 8768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Stefano Di Renzo - Hold on! - 20210709 1724 8060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Tatarski Zespół Taneczno-Wokalny Buńczuk - 20210710 1914 9229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1313 9546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Stefano Di Renzo - Hold on! - 20210709 1724 8063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1319 9563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1331 9615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Stefano Di Renzo - Hold on! - 20210709 1734 8096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Teatr HoM - Ukryte - 20210711 1317 9558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontanna w ogrodach Belwederu w Wiedniu, 20210727 1940 0452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Bogumiła Delimata La Bogusha - A Través del Humo - 20210710 1729 8791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1821 8242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1827 8246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Tatarski Zespół Taneczno-Wokalny Buńczuk - 20210710 1935 9296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1834 8299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34. Ulica - Bogumiła Delimata La Bogusha - A Través del Humo - 20210710 1729 8790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park of Melk Abbey, 20210728 1012 0555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belweder w Wiedniu, 20210727 1926 0436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göttweig Abbey, Austria, 20210729 1412 1011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göttweig Abbey, Austria, 20210729 1428 1034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1827 8250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1829 8268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 34 Ulica - Teatr Pinezka - Epidemia śmiechu - 20210709 1804 8138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Lallint 01:42, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melk Abbey - garden pavilion, 20210728 0944 0503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rzeźba w ogrodzie Belwederu w Wiedniu, 20210727 1948 0457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół Wniebowzięcia Najświętszej Marii Panny w Toruniu, 20210908 1552 2759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zamek w Malborku, 20210908 1023 2501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 19:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zamek w Malborku, 20210908 1028 2507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 19:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park Opactwa Benedyktynów w Melku, 20210728 1005 0545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Emmersdorf an der Donau from Melk Abbey park, 20210728 0959 0536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 19:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osioł pręgierz w Toruniu, 20210908 1745 2832.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:51, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zakole Wisły pod Skawiną w województwie małopolskim, 20220129 0847 4145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 19:22, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giewont w Tatrach, 20210906 1146 2382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality Lmbuga 20:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Bratislava from Nový most, 20210727 1014 0275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality Lmbuga 20:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stein an der Donau, Lower Austria, 20210728 1244 0798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality Lmbuga 20:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunajec - widok z mostu w Sromowcach Niżnych, 20210807 1316 1690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół św. Benedykta na Podgórzu w Krakowie, 20220213 0901 4228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tomer T 14:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort 31 Benedykt, Kraków, 20220213 0907 4229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kopiec Kraka w Krakowie, 20220213 0922 4240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamieniołom Liban w Krakowie, 20220213 0934 4247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kot na ulicy Obozowej w Krakowie, 20220214 1200 4283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good cat portrait. -- Ikan Kekek 20:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estakada kolejowa na linii nr 624 w Krakowie, 20220213 0930 4245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißenkirchen in der Wachau, 20210728 1212 0708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Czerwony Klasztor, zegar słoneczny, 20210807 0853 1386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:30, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatry, widok z polany Świnkówka na Gorcu, 20220313 0950 4372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamienica Gorczańska, 20220313 1204 4430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1025 4408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatry, widok z Gorca Kamienickiego, 20220313 0959 4379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapliczka pod Krzczonowicami, 20220319 1021 4504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:24, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1025 4409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1030 4421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1026 4412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1024 4405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1024 4404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruine Hinterhaus, Spitz, 20210728 1143 0641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1022 4395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 14:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatry, widok z Gorca Kamienickiego, 20220313 1004 4388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 14:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruine Hinterhaus, Spitz, 20210728 1141 0628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofarnsdorf, Wachau, Lower Austria, 20210728 1201 0668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Przystań na Dunaju w Spitz w Dolinie Wachau, 20210728 1147 0655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißenkirchen in der Wachau, 20210728 1212 0700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterloiben, Wachau Valley, Lower Austria, 20210728 1236 0777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stein an der Donau, Lower Austria, 20210728 1245 0803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bratislava Castle, 20210727 1058 0316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, interesting window in the facade :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pichlhof, Dürnstein, Lower Austria, 20210728 1324 0821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterloiben, Wachau Valley, Lower Austria, 20210728 1327 0823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z wieży na Gorcu, 20220313 1022 4394.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las w Aleksandrowicach pod Krakowem, 20220403 0857 4658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joching, Wachau Valley, Lower Austria, 20210728 1411 0869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruine Hinterhaus, Spitz, 20210728 1143 0638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiewiórka pospolita, Kraków, 20220315 0951 4444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trzy Korony i Dunajec - widok ze słowackich Pienin, 20210807 1014 1531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół św. Wawrzyńca w Malborku, 20210908 1036 2517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zamek w Malborku, widok z północnego wschodu, 20210908 1035 2512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok na Bratysławę ze wzgórza zamkowego, 20210727 1113 0341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zamek w Malborku, 20210908 1023 2502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Čumil, Bratysława, 20210727 1143 0352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holocaust and Demolished Synagogue Memorial in Bratislava, Rybné námestie, 20210727 1041 0301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christ statue, Beblavého, Bratislava, 20210727 1044 0307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sigismund Gate of Bratislava Castle, 20210727 1047 0308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:14, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polana Kondratowa, Tatry, 20210906 1008 2328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observation deck of the New Bridge in Bratislava, 20210727 1029 0296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of St Martin, Bratislava, 20210727 1119 0345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Devín Castle, 20220428 1011 5715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 22:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Devín Castle over Danube, 20220428 1020 5740.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zamek Devín nad ujściem Morawy do Dunaju, 20220428 1015 5732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Large dust spot in the center of the sky to remove. --Steindy 19:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Thank you, fixed --Jakubhal 05:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:45, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Devín Castle, 20220428 1050 5782.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forchtenstein Castle, Austria, 20220425 0938 4943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Castle Forchtenstein, 20220425 1006 4949.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Castle Forchtenstein, 20220425 1006 4950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forchtenstein Castle, Austria, 20220425 1106 5039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chmura burzowa, Rzuchów, świętokrzyskie, 20220513 1950 5852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 17:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruszków, z kościołem św. Stanisława Biskupa pośrodku, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0829 5897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 19:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola rzepaku ze Świętym Krzyżem (Łysą Górą) w tle, 20220515 1408 5963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół św. Stanisława Biskupa w Ruszkowie, 20220513 1615 5826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola rzepaku pod Trębanowem, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220514 1536 5863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krzyż przydrożny w Czerwonej Górze, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0834 5906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krzyż przydrożny w Kosowicach, 20220515 0916 5941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola pod Małoszycami, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220513 1534 5810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pomnik Władysława Beliny-Prażmowskiego w Ruszkowcu, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0831 5899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola pod Kosowicami, świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0914 5939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1734 5411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1722 5396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl, Rust, Burgenland, sunrise, 20220428 0549 5666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1725 5407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1833 4870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. A goose and two goslings, right? If so, it would be good to state that. Does the father help raise the goslings in this species? -- Ikan Kekek 19:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC) Comment Yes, I think it is female, although I'm not 100% sure. The father helps to raise the goslings. Here he was also present, but one meter behind and out of focus for this photo. I've updated the description --Jakubhal 19:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Lodewicus de Honsvels 21:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1329 5068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1333 5078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1329 5067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you sharpen the photo? --Steindy 16:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Yes, sharpen a little bit. I wouldn't go further. The focus is on the stork head and the thing he throws away and I think now they are sharp. --Jakubhal 16:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 13:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola pod Roztylicami, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0906 5932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staw w Garbaczu, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220515 0911 5938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1649 5980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1650 5983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1655 5994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1723 6005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1729 6017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1640 4818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 21:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1656 5995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaża w Mikoszewie, 20220521 1738 6054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dom podcieniowy nr 32-33 w Żuławkach, 20220522 1824 6219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dom podcieniowy nr 32-33 w Żuławkach, 20220522 1824 6225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dom podcieniowy nr 32-33 w Żuławkach, 20220522 1825 6227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Latarnia Morska Hel, 20220522 1619 6208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bałtyk na Helu, 20220522 1558 6194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 20:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, fixed --Jakubhal 11:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruiny kościoła w Steblewie, 20220522 1859 6252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Posąg Neptuna w Helu, 20220522 1552 6192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port of Hel, Poland, 20220522 1550 6190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--Pi bot (talk) 07:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pole rzepaku pod Osłonką, województwo pomorskie, 20220523 1000 6376.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola rzepaku w Grochowie Trzecim, 20220523 0938 6358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanał Drzewny pod Osłonką, województwo pomorskie, 20220523 1003 6380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zachód słońca na Pychowicach w Krakowie, 20220601 2022 6422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół w Palczewie, 20220523 0843 6316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bałtyk na Helu, 20220522 1534 6164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stary dom i pola pod Orłowem, 20220523 0908 6348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dom podcieniowy w Orłowie, 20220523 0911 6350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola rzepaku w Rybinie, 20220523 0928 6357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zachód słońca na Pychowicach w Krakowie, 20220601 2023 6428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1833 4868.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser in flight, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1652 5367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pigs on a farm in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1354 5124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. This is a Mangalica. --Steindy 21:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamb on a farm in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1349 5111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garbs in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1409 5176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mörbisch am See, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1635 5353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser in flight, Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220425 1351 5116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1448 5271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1448 5272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lalka z miotłą na bramie farmy, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1453 5276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Mörbisch am See, 20220425 1552 5307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Mörbisch am See, Austria, 20220425 1447 5264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Sweet! Good quality. --Steindy 15:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1820 4852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, zachód słońca, 20220425 1942 5414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dachy w Rust, 20220424 1640 4816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1610 4781.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1811 4851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1558 4780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Nezyderskie w Rust, 20220424 1810 4849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church and Rathausplatz in Rust, Austria, 20220424 1634 4802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joseph Haydngasse, Rust, Austria, 20220424 1640 4815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1941 4890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1944 4902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1947 4919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok na Jezioro Nezyderskie z wieży św. Trójcy w Rust, 20220424 1640 4817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clouds over Lake Neusiedl during sunset, 20220424 1951 4923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl, Rust, Burgenland, sunrise, 20220428 0548 5664.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl, Rust, Burgenland, sunrise, 20220428 0555 5690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulica Promowa w Tyńcu w czasie wschodu słońca, 20220612 0501 6486.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulica Promowa w Tyńcu w czasie wschodu słońca, 20220612 0501 6487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wisła w Tyńcu wcześnie rano, 20220612 0504 6489.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Neusiedl in Rust during sunset, 20220424 1941 4889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poranne mgły w okolicy ulicy Janasówka w Krakowie, 20220612 0509 6494.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poranek w Pozowicach pod Krakowem, 20220612 0528 6500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poranek w Pozowicach pod Krakowem, 20220612 0528 6501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia nest in Rust, Burgenland, Austria, 20220424 1631 4798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexandre Falguière, Eve, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, 20220618 1007 6965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 21:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amalienborg, Copenhagen, 20220616 1917 6593.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall in Roskilde, Denmark, 20220617 1157 6733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Frederiksberg Have, Denmark, 20220617 1625 6909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Frederiksberg Have, Denmark, 20220617 1625 6912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Frederiksberg Have, Denmark, 20220617 1626 6914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Frederiksberg Have, Denmark, 20220617 1626 6915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta canadensis, Frederiksberg Have, Denmark, 20220617 1627 6918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:08, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos and Fulica atra, Frederiksberg Have, Denmark, 20220617 1639 6953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:08, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wschód słońca na Koziarzu w Beskidzie Sądeckim, 20220625 0435 7437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:08, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok na Tatry z Koziarza, po wschodzie słońca, 20220625 0447 7457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:09, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Starorzecze Wisły w Wołowicach pod Krakowem, 20220626 0927 7525.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:09, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser anser, Frederiksberg Have, Denmark, 20220617 1638 6950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frederiksberg Palace in Frederiksberg, Denmark, 20220617 1634 6934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 22:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Choir stalls, Roskilde Cathedral, Denmark, 20220617 1240 6813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 15:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Choir stalls, Roskilde Cathedral, Denmark, 20220617 1242 6823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 17:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bocianie gniazdo w Ispinie, małopolskie, 20220703 1145 7709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół w Hebdowie, widok z przeciwnego brzegu Wisły, 20220703 0900 7594.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół w Hebdowie, widok z przeciwnego brzegu Wisły, 20220703 0911 7610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół w Hebdowie, widok z przeciwnego brzegu Wisły, 20220703 1126 7691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Przydrożna kapliczka w Niedarach, województwo małopolskie, 20220703 0941 7619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 19:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pomnik Kazimierza Wielkiego w Uściu Solnym, 20220703 0958 7641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 19:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figura św. Jana Nepomucena z ptasim gniazdem na rękach w Uściu Solnym, 20220703 0954 7629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:46, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościół w Hebdowie, widok z przeciwnego brzegu Wisły, 20220703 0848 7576.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figura św. Jana Nepomucena z ptasim gniazdem na rękach w Uściu Solnym, 20220703 0956 7637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fulica atra (juvenile), Frederiksberg Have, Denmark, 20220617 1636 6940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Afuma - Etsumon - 20220709 1512 7972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 18:27, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1620 8028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 10:20, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bocianie gniazdo w Niedarach, 20220703 1029 7657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:55, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Afuma - Etsumon - 20220709 1443 7845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Afuma - Etsumon - 20220709 1448 7850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 18:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Afuma - Etsumon - 20220709 1449 7852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Afuma - Etsumon - 20220709 1451 7858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Ici’bas Company - L’Envers - 20220710 1303 8188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:21, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Agro the Clown - ImproLocura - 20220710 1510 8248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1627 8044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1628 8045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Ici’bas Company - L’Envers - 20220710 1321 8225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Afuma - Etsumon - 20220709 1502 7900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Agro the Clown - ImproLocura - 20220710 1529 8270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Ici’bas Company - L’Envers - 20220710 1305 8193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Kamchàtka - 20220710 1731 8329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1601 7975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1604 7986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Kamchàtka - 20220710 1739 8367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1622 8034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1625 8039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1637 8069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fresco from the early 1500s, St. Birgitta's Chapel, Roskilde Cathedral, 20220617 1208 6750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1610 8009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1610 8010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1614 8018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Teatr Migro - Echa - 20220709 1615 8019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Kamchàtka - 20220710 1737 8363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kastelsmøllen, Copenhagen, 20220616 1843 6565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citadel Church, Copenhagen, 20220616 1846 6569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kastellet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 20220616 1845 6567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35. Ulica - Afuma - Etsumon - 20220709 1452 7862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pomnik na miejscu śmierci partyzantów AK w 1943 w Ćmielowie, 20220723 1458 8418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 03:47, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pola w Gromadzicach, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220724 0933 8486.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:31, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krzyż przydrożny pod Czerwoną Górą, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220724 0912 8474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiatrak w Szwarszowicach, 20220724 0930 8482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruszków, z kościołem św. Stanisława Biskupa, województwo świętokrzyskie, 20220724 0909 8472.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krzyż przydrożny w Gromadzicach, świętokrzyskie, 20220724 0933 8487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krzyż przydrożny w Truskolasach, świętokrzyskie, 20220724 0919 8476.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarcophagi of Christopher, Duke of Lolland - Roskilde Cathedral, 20220617 1222 6774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarcophagi of Frederik IV and Louise of Denmark, Roskilde Cathedral, 20220617 1218 6769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krzyż przydrożny w Janowicach, świętokrzyskie, 20220724 0921 8478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! An official and his wife, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, 20220618 1031 6994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King Ramesses II and the God Ptah, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, 20220618 1031 6995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domy w Roskilde, 20220617 1159 6739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Junona, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, 20220618 1048 7020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empress Sabina, wife of Hadrian, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, 20220618 1047 7018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roman sarcophagus of Aurelia Kyrilla, Rome, c. 300 AD, Ny Carlsberg Glyptothek, Copenhagen, 20220618 1042 7011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Young Woman, Sanctuary of Diana at Nemi, 1st century AD, Marble, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, 20220618 1050 7024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, geocoding would be fine. --Palauenc05 15:19, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christian VIII's Palæ, Amalienborg Palace, Copenhagen, 20220617 0852 6679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:35, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cybele, from Formale in Campania c. 60 BC, marble - Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, 20220618 1056 7035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 19:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb Lion, probably from Marathon, 330 BC, Marble - Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, 20220618 1059 7040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosenborg Palace, Copenhagen, Denmark, 20220617 0908 6687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. However, the WB looks a bit too cold --Uoaei1 05:00, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Double Herm, from Nemi or close by, 2nd century AD, marble - Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, 20220618 1050 7023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:00, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, 20220618 1101 7044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:35, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosenborg Palace, Copenhagen, Denmark, 20220617 0909 6689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aismallard 01:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyhavn, Copenhagen, 20220616 1932 6619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:39, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boats at Nyhavn, Copenhagen, 20220616 1934 6622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:39, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boats at Nyhavn, Copenhagen, 20220616 1937 6628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:39, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosenborg Palace, Copenhagen, Denmark, 20220617 0913 6707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 22:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosenborg Palace, Copenhagen, Denmark, 20220617 0912 6703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen, Rosenborg Barracks, 20220617 0913 6709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen, view from Rundetårn, 20220617 1006 6721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain in Tivoli Gardens, Copenhagen, 20220618 1307 7156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 17:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosenhaven, Kongens Have, Copenhagen, 20220617 0909 6695.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holmen Church, Copenhagen, 20220618 1344 7158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christiansborg Palace, Copenhagen, 20220618 1354 7160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyhavn, Copenhagen, 20220618 1720 7346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen, view from Rundetårn with Rosenborg Castle, 20220617 1004 6716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Disturbing spot at the left side in the sky should be removed. --Ermell 21:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. I think it was a minor cloud, but ok, cloned out --Jakubhal 05:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. I think you were right. Sorry. --Ermell 20:06, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyhavn, Copenhagen, 20220618 1725 7350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:01, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyhavn, Copenhagen, 20220618 1726 7351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:01, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyhavn, Copenhagen, 20220618 1727 7353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:01, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyhavn, Copenhagen, 20220618 1728 7354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anchor at Nyhavn, Copenhagen, 20220618 1739 7363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:01, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MSC Poesia near Copenhagen, 20220618 1828 7372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. But more cut from the bottom would be better --George Chernilevsky 05:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Budynki na Trangravsvej w Kopenhadze, 20220618 1515 7282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:18, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosenborg Palace, Copenhagen, Denmark, 20220617 0912 6704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frederik's Church, Copenhagen, view from the sea, 20220618 1514 7273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Circle Bridge, Copenhagen, 20220618 1531 7319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:17, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ministerstwo Dzieci i Edukacji i kanał Frederiksholms w Kopenhadze, 20220618 1535 7333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:06, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 71 Nyhavn Hotel, Copenhagen, 20220618 1719 7345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ubud Palace, Bali, Indonesia, 20220822 0904 9820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crater of Mount Bromo, Java, Indonesia, 20220820 0558 9456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:49, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kot na ulicy Dżakarty w Indonezji, 20220828 1635 1446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 12:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jerman Beach in Kuta, Bali, Indonesia, 20220825 1254 0822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:21, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulfur mining at Kawah Ijen, Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0523 9640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulfur mining at Kawah Ijen, Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0523 9641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulfur mining at Kawah Ijen, Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0526 9644.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis, Ubud Monkey Forest, Bali, 20220822 0957 9910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulfur mining at Kawah Ijen, Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0534 9673.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mgła nad Wisłą pod Tyńcem w Krakowie, 20220902 1485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mgła nad Wisłą pod Tyńcem w Krakowie, 20220902 1493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 17:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wschód słońca nad Wisłą pod Tyńcem w Krakowie, 20220902 1207 1473.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wschód słońca nad Wisłą pod Tyńcem w Krakowie, 20220902 1503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opactwo w Tyńcu w porannej mgle, 20220917 1559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mgła nad Wisłą pod Tyńcem w Krakowie, 20220902 1507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wały przeciwpowodziowe nad Wisłą w Piekarach pod Krakowem, 20220917 1570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ketapang Ferry Port, East Java, 20220821 1054 9794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 17:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prom ze wschodniej Jawy na Bali, 20220821 1105 9802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wały w Tyńcu i deszczowe chmury podczas zachodu słońca, Kraków, 20220920 1650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful dramatic sky and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pole słoneczników pod Aleksandrowicami, małopolskie, 20221009 1682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleja Klonów w Złotym Potoku, 20221016 1044 1711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleja Klonów w Złotym Potoku, 20221016 1101 1728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleja Klonów w Złotym Potoku, 20221016 1103 1734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleja Klonów w Złotym Potoku, 20221016 1103 1733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleja Klonów w Złotym Potoku, 20221016 1105 1739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:04, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleja Klonów w Złotym Potoku, 20221016 1104 1738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 18:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 1131 1758 - Pałac Raczyńskich w Złotym Potoku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but a bit darker sky would have been more beautiful --Michielverbeek 05:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 1140 1765 - lew, Pałac Raczyńskich w Złotym Potoku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sidzinka, Tyniec, Kraków, 20221007 1604 1654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 1142 1772 - Pałac Raczyńskich w Złotym Potoku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bedulu village, Yeh Pulu temple, Bali, 20220824 1033 0646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 20:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis, Ubud Monkey Forest, Bali, 20220822 1012 9935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grooming, Macaca fascicularis, Ubud Monkey Forest, Bali, 20220822 1022 9965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and really interesting motive in general --FlocciNivis 09:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis, Ubud Monkey Forest, Bali, 20220822 1053 0056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 19:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis, Ubud Monkey Forest, Bali, 20220822 1054 0065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 19:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis, Ubud Monkey Forest, Bali, 20220822 1014 9940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 17:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rice fields, Bedulu near Ubud, Bali, Indonesia, 20220824 1039 0665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 16:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alejka na Podgórzu w Krakowie, 20221023 0931 1775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 12:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis, Ubud Monkey Forest, Bali, 20220822 1053 0059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bedulu village, Yeh Pulu temple, Bali, 20220824 1030 0632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It looks a bit tilted, could you correct the verticals? --BigDom 07:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, I've prepared new version. --Jakubhal 09:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks better but now there's a white slither down the side where it's been rotated, happy to support once that's sorted. --BigDom 10:44, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for noticing. Fixed. --Jakubhal 10:53, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 11:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bedulu village, Yeh Pulu temple, Bali, 20220824 1030 0633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bedulu village, Yeh Pulu temple, Bali, 20220824 1032 0644.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kawah Ijen, Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0535 9678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 20:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kawah Ijen, Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0543 9690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 20:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kawah Ijen, Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0545 9691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 20:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:20171118 Vientiane 3231 DxO.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bali - Pura Tanah Lot, 20220827 1004 1140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bali - Pura Tanah Lot, 20220827 0957 1108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 21:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bali - Pura Tanah Lot, 20220827 0958 1114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 21:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bali - Pura Tanah Lot, 20220827 1003 1124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bali - Pura Tanah Lot, 20220827 1003 1129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bali - Pura Tanah Lot, 20220827 1003 1127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jesienny las w Rżuchowie w województwie świętokrzyskim, 20221030 1507 1830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:47, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior of Kawah Ijen volcano crater, 20220821 0547 9699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:46, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kawah Ijen, Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0608 9712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:46, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kawah Ijen, Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0609 9719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kawah Ijen, Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0610 9722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crater of Kawah Ijen volcano, East Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0611 9726.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crater of Kawah Ijen volcano, East Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0612 9731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crater of Kawah Ijen volcano, East Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0612 9732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crater of Kawah Ijen volcano, East Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0613 9738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 0957 1098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peak of volcanic cone, Kawah Ijen, Indonesia, 20220821 0611 9727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pura Batu Bolong, Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 1004 1135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pura Batu Bolong, Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 1005 1143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pura Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 1007 1147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 0959 1118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 0957 1103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Batu Bolong Temple, Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 1011 1166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pura Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 1029 1193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:32, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Batu Bolong Temple, Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 1010 1163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Batu Bolong Temple, Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 1010 1164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 1008 1159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1038 8946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:18, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1037 8934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1039 8950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1040 8958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1038 8942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1036 8926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1037 8930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 1015 1179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Batu Bolong Temple, Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 1012 1173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:37, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pura Tanah Lot, Bali, Indonesia, 20220827 1028 1187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:37, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1041 8964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1041 8973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1043 8976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1045 8988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trail from Kawah Ijen, East Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0641 9775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raung - view from Kawah Ijen, East Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0643 9778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yogyakarta, Java, Indonesia, 20220816 1512 8515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Kawaj Ijen, Java, Indonesia, 20220821 0655 9791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:14, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1032 8903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1033 8907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:23, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1045 8990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:07, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1047 8998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:56, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1048 9000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1050 9004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa Gajah temple, Bedulu, Bali, Indonesia, 20220824 0929 0544.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:54, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1047 8996.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis, Pura Luhur Uluwatu, Bali, 20220826 0955 1021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luhur Uluwatu Temple, Bali, 20220826 0953 1016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganesha, Semarang, Central Java, 8th-9th century - The National Museum of Indonesia, Jakarta - 20220828 1209 1314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1035 8919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taman Sari Water Castle, Yogyakarta, 20220818 1032 8901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A white triangle at the bottom right. But the crop is quite tight to the right. --C messier 21:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you very much for noticing! Fixed, with as little more tight crop as I could. --Jakubhal 06:06, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support ok. --C messier 21:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --দিব্য দত্ত 13:48, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:56, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jerman Beach, Kuta, Bali, Indonesia, 20220825 1324 0827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ngadisari, Java, Indonesia, 20220820 0948 9556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 15:02, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jerman Beach, Kuta, Bali, Indonesia, 20220825 1329 0831.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 10:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2022/2023![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Jakubhal! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 01:37, 23 December 2022 (UTC)   [reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jerman Beach, Kuta, Bali, Indonesia, 20220825 1331 0833.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jerman Beach, Kuta, Bali, Indonesia, 20220825 1207 0816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ngadisari, Java, Indonesia, 20220820 0948 9557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Candi Lumbung, Prambanan, Java, Indonesia, 20220818 1325 9184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]