User talk:Jakubhal/Archives/2006 - September 2011

Bałtów Park Jurajski 001.jpg

Hi Jakubhal,

just dropped in to let you know that someone tagged your image Image:Bałtów Park Jurajski 001.jpg for deletion.

TeunSpaans 19:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Iwaniska noch einmal

Jeszcze raz dziękuję za wskazanie drogi ;)

--Agastasiak 17:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Stare wersje

Gotowe. Pokasowałam, jak prosiłeś. Daj znać, gdybyś miał jeszcze jakąś robótkę :). Pozdrawiam, Maire 13:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Zdjęcie synagogi w Wodzisławiu

Hejka! Czy załadowanie tego zdjęcia podwójnie miało jakiś cel? Pozdrawiam, Kangel 22:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Kurozwęki

Jakbym wiedzial, to bym opisal :) Jeden to chyba restauracja, drugi - nie mam zielonego pojecia... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Czyżów

No ok, ale po co trzymać nieaktualne zdjęcia? Porównaj np moje zdjęcie bramy z Twoim zdjęciem. Panta Rhei, nawet w Polsce czasami remontują budynki ;) Pozdrawiam, Szater.

Mam kilka zdjęć z Sandomierza i Zawichostu, to wszystko. Jak coś, to no problemo. Pzdr Szater

Your help is needed

Hello Jakubhal, could you please re-upload your image: Image:20080217 Krakow kamieniolom Liban 2559.jpg? There's a problem with some files, and yours is affected (only thumbs are still there, not the full version). See Commons:Village pump#Massive image loss for more information. Many thanks --:bdk: 13:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reaction. And cool you've already found the other ones :-) --:bdk: 15:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Muzeum w Częstocicach

Może warto poczekać czasem poczekać z krytyką. Faktycznie w tym przypadku jedną fotę źle skategoryzowałem, ale na spójrz ile zrobiłem dobrze. Zwiadowca ²¹ 20:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Pinczow church 20060722 1417.jpg

Witam! Sorki, nie spodziewałem się, że dodanie kategorii Pińczów będzie błędem... - dodałem ją, gdyż chwilkę wcześniej bezskutecznie szukałem zdjęcia kościoła św. Jana w commons folderze Pińczów. Uznałem więc, że dopisanie przy nim 2giej kategorii ułatwiającej odnalezienie zdjęcia z danego miasta po kategorii miasto nie zaszkodzi. Tak zresztą rozumiem sens nadawania kategorii.

Ty jesteś autorem zdjęcia - ty decydujesz - więc przepraszam :)

Na koniec dodam jeszcze tylko, że wydaje mi się, iż to pierwszy przypadek, że dopisałem do Twojego zdjęcia kategorię.

z poważaniem --Jrkruk (talk) 10:33, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

• Rozumiem, jest OK. A przy okazji - z przyjemnością oglądam Twoje zdjęcia z Ponidzia, doceniam umiejętnośc ujmowania w kadrze obiektów :)

Pozdrawiam! --Jrkruk (talk) 12:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Jakubhal/Archives!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 15:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Opatowiec herb.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Chinese zodiac photo error (mirrored image)

Jakubhal:

Nice pic appearing on the Chinese zodiac page, however the photo is displaying mirror image in error.

Compare your image: 20100720 Fukuoka Kushida 3614.jpg

To another image on the same Chinese zodiac page: Daoist-symbols Qingyanggong Chengdu.jpg

The order of the animals are reversed on your image. Inspect the four cardinal directions - north in blue is correctly oriented down (北 běi), and south in green is oriented up (南 nán) - therefore west in yellow (西 xī) should be to the visual right and east in red (東 dōng) to the left.

In Photoshop for example, you would Edit >> Transform >> Flip Horizontal

Missylou2who (talk) 19:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

You are exactly correct: Because the original is positioned to be viewed on the ceiling, north and south are reversed. It is further disguised because the Han radicals for the cardinal directions have been intentionally made to appear symmetrical. Thanks for clarifying.

--Missylou2who (talk) 12:52, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110723 Venice San Giorgio Maggiore 5117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:30, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110720 Verona Ponte Scaligero Imgp3299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot. --High Contrast 11:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodzentyn zamek 20080701 3753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:30, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090529 Great Wall 8216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 20:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090529 Great Wall 8185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 20:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20100723 Miyajima 5117B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20100715 Osaka Umeda Sky Building escalator 1855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness and noise not optimum, but good enough.--Jebulon 16:30, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090905 Suzhou Buddha North Temple Pagoda 4613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tak--Jebulon 16:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110827 Frecce Tricolori Radom Air Show 9980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture. -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 22:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090608 Hangzhou Feilai Feng 9060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please geotag. --Cayambe 15:27, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20091004 lion dance Hong Kong Kowloon 6823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good cultural illustration. --99of9 02:40, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinczow 20060722 1429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The thing in foreground is disturbing, but it is a QI nevertheless, imo.--Jebulon 22:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giebultow kosciol 20080426 3204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:40, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20080217 Krakow Kosciol sw Benedykta 2602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:40, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarnow Rynek 20080708 4154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:40, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krakow Podgorze church 20070814 1755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. And I like the top of the tower bell--Jebulon 15:01, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110827 Mi-24 Radom Air Show 2011 8617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ianare 21:02, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090529 Great Wall 8125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20091004 tai chi Hong Kong Kowloon 6895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Riotforlife 10:08, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090905 Suzhou 4532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 08:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090606 Putuoshan 8879.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments spot (see note) that can be easily removed; the picture is good --Archaeodontosaurus 17:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)  Done -- Jakubhal 18:25, 31 August 2011 (UTC) O.K. now. Very nice! -- MJJR 20:44, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110724 Milan Cathedral 5266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In spite of the scaffoldings--Jebulon 19:48, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110724 Milano 5359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 10:09, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110506 Opatow Brama Warszawska 8795.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110425 German Shepherd Dog 8505.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tight crop. --Quartl 20:27, 30 August 2011 (UTC) -- I have uploaded little less tight version, unfortunately can't do more. Jakubhal 18:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Ok to me now. --Quartl 06:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wislica Bazylika tablica fundacyjna 20070825 1508.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but a little bit tilted, and need of a perspective correction.--Jebulon 22:23, 29 August 2011 (UTC) -- I did what I can. Is it good enough? -- Jakubhal 19:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC) O yes, far much better IMO. Thanks for improvements.--Jebulon 23:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bałtów Park Jurajski 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Fandecaisses 11:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20100721 Sakurajima Nagisa Lava Trail 3968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, good to me--Lmbuga 18:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20100723 Miyajima 4904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 21:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20100723 Miyajima 5116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 19:48, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostrowiec kosciol 20071008 0908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Czonek 22:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 00 20110327 Krakow Salwator Monastery 8014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 19:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Note about File:Boat in Florida Keys.jpg

I saw that you turned down File:Boat in Florida Keys.jpg as a quality image because it was blurred. I just wanted to let you know that the image is intentionally blurred to convey motion (that's why it's listed in Category:Motion blur). I'm not going to ask for a review, since it isn't really one of my best images, but just wanted to let you know that. - EdoDodo ^talk 19:19, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110722 Venice Santa Maria della Salute 4459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments -- Nice Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 17:52, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090529 Great Wall Simatai 8350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 17:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Great Wall of China at Jinshanling.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:11, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110725 Milano La Scala 5507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20100728 Kawaguchiko Station 6622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and beautiful background. --Andrei Stroe 08:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20100722 Hiroshima Shukkeien 4387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 08:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Korekcja perspektywy

Witam. Teraz zdjęcie jest OK, ale nie zdążyłem się wypowiedzieć, bo mnie kilka dni nie było. Ale ponieważ moja opinia nie jest tam liczona jako Template:Przeciw, to chyba nie ma sensu jest usuwać czy kreślić. Pozdrawiam --Pudelek (talk) 09:16, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20100724 Iwakuni 5235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice --Ianare 11:08, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostrowiec kosciol 20071008 0913.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090426 5223 Shanghai JinMao SWFC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 08:57, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krakow kosciol 20070930 1404 1467.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yellow cast IMO (I know the problem very well.)--Jebulon 10:41, 4 September 2011 (UTC) -- I have corrected it a little bit. Is it good enough? Jakubhal 16:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC) Support Better, shame of the graffiti...--Jebulon 13:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krakow Salwator 20071229 1053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me. I like the shades--Lmbuga 19:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110827 Mi-24 Radom Air Show 2011 8612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fajne, lepsze chyba od wszystkich moich zdjęć tej maszyny. Airwolf 20:43, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20100725 Tokyo Five-storied Pagoda Sensoji 5379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, even the trees look fine. --Someone35 12:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110827 Mi-24 Radom Air Show 2011 8582.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 05:13, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090524 Hangzhou West Lake 7531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 13:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110827 Patrouille de France Radom 9417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 11:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110917 Krakow Kosciol Mariacki 0306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 23:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110917 Krakow most Pilsudskiego 0357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me-- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 23:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20080804 freight bicycle Shanghai 2383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Vassil 21:31, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110827 RNLAF F-16 Demo Team 9675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok for QI --Carschten 14:56, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110827 Black Hawk Radom Air Show 9577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me-- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 17:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110827 Mi-24 Radom Air Show 8611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me-- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 17:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110720 Mantua Cathedral 3545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 07:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090905 Suzhou Changmen 4706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Impostor or not impostor ?

Many thanks for your care !!

But don't worry, it is me !!

Jebulon = jebulo !

I've had many problems to connect at english wikipedia, I don't know why, but I was forced to create a new account, and I made a mistake with the nickname and forgot the "n" at the end !! Now, I've two accounts with the same IP, and I've some problems with "global accounts" when connecting.

I don't know how and what to do ! My hope is : destroy the "jebulo" account opened in the english wp, and his "global account", but for now I cannot log in with the "jebulon" global account in the english wikipedia !!

Anyway, thanks again ! --Jebulon (talk) 17:56, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110722 Venice San Giorgio Maggiore 4136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice - Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 07:50, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090705 Shanghai Nanjing Road 0602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:34, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110720 Verona Ponte Scaligero 3242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 13:17, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Good work

My English is too bad, bat your work is very good. Thanks. I like your images--Miguel Bugallo 14:46, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20100723 Miyajima Itsukushima 5189.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 22:36, 23 September 2011 (UTC) I'm not sure, but to me red CAs (see notes). Zones overexposed--Lmbuga 00:44, 24 September 2011 (UTC)  Info Sorry, but what you show me (with your notes) seems to be shadows. It's near sunset. The sun is low and little from right side. If you look again on entire picture you will notice that shadowed parts are in dark orange, as the sides of the bars you show me. --Jakubhal 06:26, 24 September 2011 (UTC) Ok, sorry--Lmbuga 10:29, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20100721 Sakurajima Ferry 4243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 21:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110720 Verona 3078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness could be better, but otherwise very nice image. Good composition. -- MJJR 21:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110725 Cremona Cathedral 5933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tak.--Jebulon 22:02, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090926 Imgp5923 Wu Zixu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop a bit tight, but main subject OK. QI--Jebulon 14:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20090530 Beijing Summer Palace 8467.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Are the ladies Imperial concubines ? :). QI, inspite of minor composition error IMO: I miss some space under the pedestal of the vase at right, and it needs a little crop at the right edge (below corner).--Jebulon 14:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC) Thanks!  Done for little right crop. Vase - I know what you mean, but cannot help it (bottom edge is from original shot). --Jakubhal 15:07, 2 October 2011 (UTC)