User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Pi bot)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon (MP) 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Wikimedia Hackathon (MP) 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good shadows and composition. --Nacaru 23:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:15, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Museo Histórico Militar de Canarias 2023 404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barringer Crater 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The object is on the righthand-side. Can you crop the image? --Alexander-93 07:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking, cropped, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. --Alexander-93 18:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 15:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I think that it needs a bit of perspective correction --Poco a poco 08:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking, perspective redone, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I was probably too picky, QI --Poco a poco 21:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]