User talk:Jrkruk
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Orgullomoore 19:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Synagoga[edit]
Witaj, wielkie dzięki za zdjęcie! Przed chwilą napisałem Ci na plwiki, ale Widzę, że akurat jesteś teraz na commons. Musisz uzupełnij zdjęcie o szablon z licencją. Pozdrawiam Jakubhal 17:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. Yonidebest Ω Talk 23:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. Yonidebest Ω Talk 00:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:JKRUK_20070513_PL_WISLICA_DOM_DLUGOSZA_EL_W.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:JKRUK_20070513_PL_WISLICA_DOM_DLUGOSZA_EL_W.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:JKRUK_20070513_PL_WISLICA_DOM_DLUGOSZA_EL_N.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:JKRUK_20070513_PL_WISLICA_DOM_DLUGOSZA_EL_N.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Please link images[edit]
Hello!
Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. Yuval Y § Chat § 22:24, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:JKRUK 20070830 MAJDOW KOSCIOL2.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:JKRUK 20070830 MAJDOW KOSCIOL2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 20:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 14:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:JKRUK 20080617 Bronina w rekach niemieckich.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:JKRUK 20080617 Bronina w rekach niemieckich.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jarekt (talk) 13:37, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Kategoryzacja obrazków[edit]
Witaj!
Dziękujemy za wysyłanie obrazków na Wikimedia Commons. Zauważ, że obrazki, które przesyłasz na Commons mogą być używane we wszystkich projektach Fundacji Wikimedia. Tym samym każdy obrazek powinien być prawidłowo skategoryzowany.
Aby umożliwić innym osobom znalezienie Twojego obrazka, grafiki powinny być umieszczone w odpowiedniej kategorii. Poza tym dobrze jest też dodać obrazki do stron o odpowiednich tematach (galerii).
Kategoryzowanie obrazków jest bardzo ważne. Już teraz mamy dużą liczbę całkowicie nieposortowanych plików. Jeżeli chciałbyś pomóc w ich porządkowaniu, rób to!
Dziękuję. Kimse (talk) 02:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- (latin RU) Ha-ha! U tebja otlichno poluchilos', ja vsje ponjal! Spasibo za otvet, day mne znat' jesli nuzhna budet pomosz. Cześć --Kimse (talk) 04:44, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Zmiana loginu[edit]
Kwestia zmiany loginu jest możliwa, lecz nie taka prosta. Sysopi nie mają takich uprawnień. Należy napisać na odpowiedniej stronie wniosek o zmianę loginu. Sprawdź stronę Commons:Changing username. ABach (talk) 09:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 05:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Aleksander Michalski (1855-1904).JPG is uncategorized since 25 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:JKRUK 20090228 ŁOŚ MEDALION IMG 3148.jpg is uncategorized since 2 March 2009. BotMultichillT 08:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:GRAWERUNEK BULINO PETER GNYP BLASER93B.jpg is uncategorized since 9 April 2009.
- Image:JKRUK 20110204 ZAMEK TROPSZTYN DSC01618.jpg was uncategorized on 10 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:JKRUK 200908117 PIOTRKOWICE SANKTUARIUM MATKI BOZEJ LORETANSKIEJ IMG 3545A.jpg was uncategorized on 29 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:29, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:JKRUK 20111227 LOWIEC SWIETOKRZYSKI.jpg was uncategorized on 27 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
File:JKRUK_20080504_JANUSZ_SKULICH_IN_BZ_DSC04909.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hystrix (talk) 16:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Commons:Kategorie - "Ogólnie, pliki powinny być umieszczone w najbardziej szczegółowej kategorii".
Proszę nie dodawaj do moich zdjęć każdej możliwej kategorii. Ty dodajesz, inni to sprzątają, a ja za każdym razem dostaje powiadomienia mejlami, że ktoś edytuje moje zdjęcia.
Za wysłuchanie prośby z góry dziękuję.
Pozdrawiam Jakubhal (talk) 16:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- No faktycznie, to był pierwszy raz. Przepraszam. Trudno mi połapać się już kto i kiedy zmieniał. Przez pewien czas rzadko zaglądałem na Commons, przychodziły do mnie tylko mejle, a potem okazywało się, że ktoś usuwa kategorie, które ktoś inny dodawał kilka tygodni wcześniej albo odwrotnie. Tam i z powrotem. No ale rzeczywiście, Ty akurat nie powinieneś być adresatem moich pretensji. Przepraszam jeszcze raz. Jakubhal (talk) 12:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska zaprasza Cię na warsztaty fotograficzne, które odbędą się w Łodzi, 1-3 maja 2010. Twój wkład do Wikimedia Commons wskazuje, że możesz wiele skorzystać z udziału w warsztatach i podzielić się swoim doświadczeniem fotograficznym z innymi. Warsztaty są skierowane do:
- osób już wgrywających mniejsze czy większe ilości zdjęć do Wikimedia
Commons - niezależnie od ich jakości
- fototoamatorów - nie związanych dotąd z projektami Wikimedia
- zawodowych fotografów - w charakterze doradców i wykładowców
Nie ma znaczenia jaki typ fotografii preferujesz - w Wikimedia Commons jest miejsce zarówno dla portrecistów, dokumentalistów, jak i fotografów pejzażu miejskiego i przyrody. Wikiwarsztaty będą miały charakter kameralny (max. 40-50 osób) i trwały przez weekend 1-3 maja 2010 <sobota-poniedziałek>, Zajęcia będą się odbywały w Łódzkim Domu Kultury oraz w plenerze. Organizatorzy zapewniają w ramach opłaty konferencyjnej (50 zł od osoby) - nocleg( PTSM na ul. Zamenhoffa), wyżywienie (obiady) i bezpłatny dostęp do Internetu w trakcie obrad.
E-mail: wikifoto@wikimedia.pl WWW: http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiwarsztaty_fotograficzne Tel: 0-22 219 56 94 Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska, ul. Tuwima 95, p. 15, Łódź.
Zobacz też: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/pl/6/66/Zaproszenie_wiki_foto_2010.pdf
Pozdrowienia,
Organizatorzy Warsztatów Wikifoto 2010
Busko[edit]
Witaj. Widzę, że sporo zdjęć w Busku zrobiłeś. Jesteś tam lub bywasz? Myślę o zrobieniu osobnej kategorii dla sanatorium/sanatorów w Busku. Czy mógłbyś wybrać zdjęcia sanatorium/sanatoriów i ewentualnie dopstrykać? (byłoby gdzie dopiąć stare zdjęcia jak File:Child's san Busko-Zdrój ca1926.jpg i doktora Starkiewicza. Ciacho5 (talk) 10:17, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:JKRUK 20110707 MFM KRYSTYNY JAMROZ XVII PLAKAT IMG 6026.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JKRUK 20110707 MFM KRYSTYNY JAMROZ XVII PLAKAT IMG 6026.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 15:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:JKRUK 20110707 MFM KRYSTYNY JAMROZ XV PLAKAT IMG 6024.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JKRUK 20110707 MFM KRYSTYNY JAMROZ XV PLAKAT IMG 6024.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 15:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:JKRUK 20110707 MFM KRYSTYNY JAMROZ XV PLAKAT IMG 6024.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JKRUK 20110707 MFM KRYSTYNY JAMROZ XV PLAKAT IMG 6024.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:JKRUK 20110707 MFM KRYSTYNY JAMROZ XVI PLAKAT IMG 6023.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JKRUK 20110707 MFM KRYSTYNY JAMROZ XVI PLAKAT IMG 6023.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:JKRUK 20110707 MFM KRYSTYNY JAMROZ XIV PLAKAT IMG 6022aa.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JKRUK 20110707 MFM KRYSTYNY JAMROZ XIV PLAKAT IMG 6022aa.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:JKRUK 20110623 ZYGMUNT MYSZKOWSKI GONZAGA IMG 3489.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JKRUK 20110623 ZYGMUNT MYSZKOWSKI GONZAGA IMG 3489.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:JKRUK 20110623 ZYGMUNT MYSZKOWSKI GONZAGA IMG 3489.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Masur (talk) 15:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:JKRUK 20110625 KONSTANTY SWIDZINSKI IN CHROBERZ IMG 3429.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JKRUK 20110625 KONSTANTY SWIDZINSKI IN CHROBERZ IMG 3429.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:JKRUK 20110625 KONSTANTY SWIDZINSKI IN CHROBERZ IMG 3429.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Masur (talk) 15:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:JKRUK 20110625 REPUBLIKA PINCZOWSKA MAPA CHROBERZ IMG 3429.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
Masur (talk) 15:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Zwróć uwagę, że fotografując fotografię lub cokolwiek innego, nie nabywasz do tego dzieła praw autorskich, bo jesteś wyłącznie autorem reprodukcji. Dotyczy to wszelkich plakatów, bannerów, map, zdjęć etc. chyba że znajdują się one w domenie publicznej. Masur (talk) 15:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:JKRUK 20091129 KS ALEKSANDER LUBOMIRSKI LITOGRAFIA M.SALBA IMG 6339.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JKRUK 20091129 KS ALEKSANDER LUBOMIRSKI LITOGRAFIA M.SALBA IMG 6339.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:JKRUK 20091129 KS ALEKSANDER LUBOMIRSKI LITOGRAFIA M.SALBA IMG 6339.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Masur (talk) 15:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
PD-old[edit]
To wszystko co mówisz, fotografowanie starych obrazów etc. czyli z domeny publicznej, jest prawdą ale nie zwalnia cię to z obowiązku podania ich autora, daty wykonania (preferencyjnie daty śmierci autora, jak ten żył w XXwieku) i źródła (w polach author/source, które do tego służą). Co więcej licencjowanie takich dzieł "-self" (czy jakąkolwiek inną licencją z której wynika, że to TY jesteś właścicielem praw autorskich) jest wciąż naruszeniem praw autorskich - prawidłowa licencja to {{PD-art}}. Zerknij na poprawnie opisany skan starego obrazu: File:Ansdell Richard Lost In The Storm.jpg Masur (talk) 12:30, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC02026.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC01981.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC02024.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:10, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC02022.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:10, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC02023.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:10, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC01981.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC02026.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC02134.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC02090.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC02058.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC02025.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20080921 JUSTYNA STECZKOWSKA PINCZOW DSC02009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zureks (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:JKRUK 20080522 MICHAL BYSZEWSKI GROB DSC08002.jpg[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:JKRUK 20080522 MICHAL BYSZEWSKI GROB DSC08002.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jarekt (talk) 13:41, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:JKRUK 20080509 WISLICA DOM DLUGOSZA POLICHROMIA JAN DLUGOSZ DSC06315.JPG[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:JKRUK 20080509 WISLICA DOM DLUGOSZA POLICHROMIA JAN DLUGOSZ DSC06315.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jarekt (talk) 01:44, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:JKRUK 20080423 STASZOW KOSCIOL SW BARTLOMIEJA DSC01002.JPG[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:JKRUK 20080423 STASZOW KOSCIOL SW BARTLOMIEJA DSC01002.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jarekt (talk) 15:56, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.
We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.
|
--GeorgHH • talk 21:23, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Cześć. Stworzyłem tę kategorię i przeniosłem do niej wszystkie publikowane przez Ciebie zdjęcia z osobami odwiedzającymi Busko-Zdrój i wydarzeniami w mieście. Przy kolejnych podobnych publikacjach dodawaj proszę tę kategorię, a nie ogólną Category:Busko-Zdrój. Pozdrawiam i gratuluję zdjęć! Lowdown (talk) 09:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
File:JRKRUK JEZU UFAM TOBIE ADOLF HYLA BUSKO IMG 0188.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— SMUconlaw (talk) 19:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Witaj, cześć, etc. Czy masz pozwolenie na publikację tego zdjęcia? Wg Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Poland nie można publikować zdjęć danej osoby bez jej zgody. Wyjątek: jeśli osoba przedstawiona na zdjęciu a) jest osobą publiczną i zdjęcie ma związek z jej publicznymi funkcjami lub b) jeśli osoba przedstawiona na zdjęciu stanowi tylko element tła. Z całą pewnością punkt b) nie jest spełniony - jeśli natomiast chodzi o punkt a), to nie jestem przekonowany - pogrzeb nie ma związku ze statusem Alfreda Miodowicza jako byłego posła, jest to chyba raczej bardziej przestrzeń prywatna, niż publiczna?
Welcome, hi, etc. Do you have a consent for the publication of this photo? According to Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Poland you may not publish one's photos without his consent. Exceptions: if the person on the photo a) is a public figure and the photo is connected to his or her public functions or b) if the person on the photo is only a part of landscape, gathering etc. Point b) is obviously not met, and I have doubts when it comes to point a) - a funeral hardly has a connection to Alfred Miodowicz's status as a former MP. We can expect that a funeral is a more private then public event?
Marcgalrespons 19:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- Ależ oczywiście, że AM jest osobą publiczną, ale nawet osoby publiczne znajdują się niekiedy, gdzieniegdzie prywatnie. Nie jestem przekonany, że AM był na pogrzebie publicznie, gdyż trudno powiedzieć, żeby jego obecność miała związek z jego statusem jako byłego posła (co innego obecność np. Donalda Tuska, który był tam ewidentnie dlatego, że jest premierem). Wracając do tematu: jak rozumiem, pozwolenia nie otrzymałeś, czy tak?
- PS. Może jestem przewrażliwiony. Dla mnie jednak twarz AM na zdjęciu wprost emanuje bólem. Pozdrawiam, Marcgalrespons 17:40, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jrkruk, I have been following discussion in relation to this photo, and have offered advice at pl:Dyskusja:Alfred_Miodowicz/archiwum#Comments_from_a_Commons_standpoint in relation to it. I understand your response on Marcgal's talk page, and I do understand your stance. It may, however, conflict with our COM:IDENT policy. I think the best thing that we can do as a community is to take it to COM:DR and hold a community discussion on the image. Please do not take the nomination the wrong way; I value the work you are doing here on Commons with providing high value images; but sometimes we need to discuss our policies as they relate to images, and this is a good example of where I feel the community might be divided on the issue at hand. I will drop you a note when I have started the DR, and I will attempt to have the deletion reasoning translated into Polish for you as well. Cheers, russavia (talk) 03:54, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
File:JRKRUK 20130829 ALFRED MIODOWICZ BUSKO IMG 3314.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
russavia (talk) 21:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
File:JRKRUK 20130829 JAN MARIA ROKITA IMG 3466.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Paelius discussion 20:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Cześć. Jak zwykle gratulują super fotografii i mam małą prośbę: czy możesz poprawić balans bieli w tym zdjęciu, gdyż za dużo w nim światła żarowego. Bardzo bym prosił. Pozdrawiam. Lowdown (talk) 13:12, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
File:JKRUK 20070719 PZLowiecki logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Lazlo 17:15, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Jrkruk,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Jrkruk,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Jrkruk,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Gratuluję, bardzo fajne zdjęcie. Artur Andrzej (talk) 11:01, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
File:JKruk 20120703 KRZESIMIR DEBSKI BUSKO IMG 8061-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
KDębski (talk) 13:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed your copyright info attached to some of the pictures that you uploaded. The requirement:
- If you use my image on your website, please send me an email with webpage adress. If you use my image in your book, please send me one copy to my home adres, which I will provide by email.
is not compatible with Creative Commons license. You can not require anything besides attribution and sharing-alike in CC-BY-SA license, especially if it comes with monetary spend by the user. I suggest that you remove this requirement or clearly describe it as a "nice to have", not required to obtain the license. See also: [1] --Wanted (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)