User talk:Jacek555

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Jacek555!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

SieBot 12:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 12:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 12:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Jacek555!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little_Swan_Island_scenery.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Telim tor (talk) 07:01, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little_Swan_Island.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Telim tor (talk) 07:01, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot poprawi linkujące (ale może trzeba ODlinkować, skoro to inny świstak), redir skasuję później. Popraw opis etc (może ta lokalizacja być istotna). Masur (talk) 19:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spermophilus suslicus (G Lesniewski).jpg[edit]

Nie jestem w OTRS-team. Wal najlepiej do Wpedzicha, u nas na plwiki. Masur (talk) 10:01, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Świstaki[edit]

OK. Ułatw mi nieco zadanie. Proszę o format:

  • zmień A (i to proszę żeby był link do pliku) na B.

Te nazwy są mega długie i nie chcę nic poplatać. Masur (talk) 17:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rotacja[edit]

Bot robi to, co wskazują mu inni, [1], zatem z nimi proszę wyjaśniać sprawę. Masur (talk) 13:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Jacek555. You have new messages at Denniss's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Re: Question[edit]

The reviewing and the OTRS is a totally different thing than the License reviewing. I am just an image-reviewer which I go to the pisasa website and confirm that the license is the same as stated on the website. The OTRS is for images that are not free under the licenses accepted by Commons, to ask the Copyright holder of the image to release it under a free license, so it can be on Commons. Then you have the Copyright holder send a declaration form, that which states that they will release the copyright and license it under a free license. Then the OTRS team verify's that the Copyright holder did release it under that permission then approves the images use on Commons. But in this case since the images were already licensed under a free license that Commons accepts it doesn't need the OTRS tag on it. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 19:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 23:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Question[edit]

As the OTRS Team said. That if they are reviewed by people with the Image reviewers user status then the OTRS team doesn't need to do anything at all because someone has reviewed it to see if it is under a free license and or confirmed that it is under that license. The OTRS team mostly deals with images that are copyrighted. As to collect information from the copyright holder or to get consent from them to release the image on Commons, or its sister projects under a free license. Also they verify from the copyright holder that the uploader of the image had permission from the copyright holder to release the image under that license. So, images on sites like Flickr, Picasa. The image reviewers review images from sites like that to verify they are under that license. They don't need an OTRS tag. You can remove them if you want, or you can wait for a reply from OTRS but no, it doesn't need an OTRS tag. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 20:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Meriones crassus.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JuTa 23:06, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I answered to your questions on my talk page. regards. --JuTa 23:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Plik[edit]

Jacku, plik oznaczyłem prawidłowym numerem zgody i zamknąłem zgłoszenie na OTRS. Nawiasem, zgłoszenie oczywiscie prawidłowe. Osobiscie zgłoszenia zamykam nawet w sytuacjach, gdy posiadaczowi praw autorskich pisze się "czy zgadza się Pan na licencję CC-by-sa" a on odpowiada tylko "zgadzam się", nie wymieniając już licencji. Został o niej poinformowany, wyraża na nią zgodę i to w zasadzie kwestia ściśle językowa... (językoznawca na grzeczne pytanie o to, czy może powiedzieć Ci, jaka jest godzina odpowie: mogę).

Co do zaproponowanego mechanizmu: nie wiem, czy podczas zakładania konta w Commons konieczne jest podanie i zweryfikowanie adresu email. Zakładam, że nie, więc sporo takich wysyłek mailowych szłoby potencjalnie w próżnię. Domyslnie chyba jednak włączone jest powiadomienie e-mail o tym, że ktoś zmodyfikował Twoją stronę dyskusji (chyba, że to zmienisz w preferencjach konta) i sądzę, że taki mechanizm już "uczula" na pojawienie się nowych rzeczy wymagających uwagi użytkownika. Ja osobiście jestem dość rpzeciwny "zmechanizowanym" rozwiązaniom w takich, dość jednak istotnych sprawach, ale jeśli czujesz taką potrzebę, to można zmontować jakąś dyskusję w barze. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 14:55, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

O ile na OTRS bywa ostry przemiał, a maile ze zgodami czasami czekają dłuższy czas tylko po to, żeby być obrobionymi w try miga przy jakimś maratonie na kilku uzytkowników, to zawsze można zajrzeć do archiwalnych zgód, jeśli istnieje gdzieś ich numer, adres nadawcy czy inne dane pozwalajace zawęzić obszar poszukiwań. Także - jak masz jakieś wątpliwości co do nienadanej zgody, czy podobne pytania, to strzelaj śmiało. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 17:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Holy Sepulchre[edit]

Napisałem z poziomu OTRS do autora zdjęcia; mam nadzieję, że odpowie. Jesli tylko dowiem sie czegokolwiek, to dam znać. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 13:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Jacek555,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mario Pezzi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutrupe (talk) 00:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Somaly Mam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:58, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cavia[edit]

Hi Jacek - many thanks for your note on the misidentified Cavia photos I uploaded; I have already left a reply on my talk page with their renaming. But your note also led me to do a review of some other files in Category:Cavia - would I be correct in thinking that File:Esterros de Farrapos 01.JPG and File:Esterros de Farrapos 13.JPG (from Esteros de Farrapos, Uruguay) are also Cavia aperea? And can you suggest an identity for File:CobayoColorado1.JPG (unfortunately, without a location), please? - MPF (talk) 12:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Commons:Upload/pl[edit]

Hej! Wybacz, ale chyba nie będę w stanie za bardzo Ci pomóc, ostatnio moje zaangażowanie w społeczność Commons i problemy tego projektu jest w zasadzie zerowe, czekam tylko aż mi zabiorą uprawnienia administracyjne za nieaktywność. Niestety każdy z nas ma jakieś granice, ile swojego czasu może oddawać Wikimediom. U mnie większość tej puli pochłania obecnie praca w Zarządzie Wikimedia Polska, a jeśli chodzi o adminowanie i edycje merytoryczne, to priorytetem jest dla mnie polskojęzyczna Wikipedia. Stąd obawiam się, że na Commons nie będzie już ze mnie wielkiego pożytku. Dziękuję za zrozumienie! Pozdrawiam! Powerek38 (talk) 09:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Upload/pl[edit]

Jak widzisz w por. do en-wersji, nasza strona uploadu na Commons jest zdezaktualizowana, i trzeba by było ją na nowo tłumaczyć. Ale nie bardzo mi się chce w tym momencie, bo ogólnie mam już dość że o pl-języczne Commons to chyba tylko ja dbam :/ Masur (talk) 10:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hypnomys by L.Meslin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LMeslin (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mariam, Umm Eisa (Sheikh Zayed) Mosque interior total view.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kurt Gerstein.jpg[edit]

Tu sprawa jest taka, że zdjęcie pewnie jest PD, ale my to musimy udowodnić = znaleźć takie źrodło, które to potwierdzi (książka, jakieś oficjalne archiwum etc.). Dlatego wisi na enwiki z notką, że nie nadaje się do Commons, bo de facto nei ma źródła, daty powstania, i innych danych które są wymagane. Masur (talk) 17:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ogólna zasada jest jasna. Ale tutaj mamy zdjęcie legitymacyjne, osoby która zmarła w 1945 czyli >70 lat temu. czy to nie wystarczy? Jacek555 (talk) 18:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nie, bo liczy się autor zdjęcia, a nie jego podmiot. Owa legitymacyjność także jest tylko domniemana. Stąd - jak zwykle - źródła! Masur (talk) 20:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Teka Melpomeny Karol Frycz − Mrozowska, Olchowska, Sobiesław, Przybyłowicz, Leszczyński i Bończa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Masur (talk) 06:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hej, mylisz się. Autor, Karol Frycz zmarł w 1963 roku, zatem jego dzieła jeszcze długo nie będą w domenie publicznej. Z kolei tzw. PD-POLAND nie ma zastosowania, wszak stosuje się je tylko do utworów fotograficznych lub otrzymanych w podobny do fotografji sposób, a to jest malunek/rysunek. Masur (talk) 07:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ale do domeny publicznej, jak autor jest znany, nie wlicza się daty publikacji, ale datę śmierci autora - od niej liczymy 70 lat (przy okazji, pracą zbiorową jest cała "Teka", ale ta konkretna ilustracja ma jednego autora; w innym wypadku należałoby liczyć od daty śmierci autora, który umarł najpóźniej > Art. 36. Ustawy "o prawach autorskich"; ostatnia nowelizacja). To częsty błąd - brać pod uwagę datę publikacji (ta ma zastosowanie do dzieł w pełni anonimowych, gdzie w ogóle nie można ustalić0 autora). Polecam hasło. I litografia, nieistotne czy się pomyliłem mówiąc o dyskutowanej pracy malunek/rysunek, nie jest fotografią - choćby dlatego, że fotografia, z definicji, to proces obrazowania zachodzący z użyciem materiałów światłoczułych ("rejestrowanie światła"). Masur (talk) 10:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Domyślne ilustracje w infoboksach[edit]

Ja widzę w kategorii na Commons ten sam plik co w Wikidanych: File:Jerzy Duszyński.jpg. Może po prostu trzeba (było) chwilki, żeby się odświeżył cache? Następnym razem spróbuj odświeżyć stronę na Commons z widoczną starszą wersją - powinno pomóc. -- Maire (talk) 22:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia legitymacyjne[edit]

Normalnie zlecający wykonanie zdjęcia jest dysponentem majątkowych praw autorskich (1). Ale jest też wykładnia (nie sądowa), że zdjęcia do dokumentów w ogóle nie są dziełem (2). Niemniej jednak, jak zlecający (czyli żołnierz) umarł w 1943 to zdjęcie jest już w PD. Trzymałbym się wykładni 1. Masur (talk) 20:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rudolf Höß's children in the garden in Auschwitz (ab.1943).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 22:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]