User talk:Hannibal/arkiv

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thank you for uploading files on Commons.

Please add your files to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example to Category:Göteborg.

EugeneZelenko 15:46, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tack för att du laddat upp denna bild. Jag satte in den på den engelska sidan en:Lasse åberg, eftersom den tidigare bilden var en skyddad förlagsbild. // Mvh Fred Chess 00:20, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Såg att du laddat upp många andra fina bilder från Bokmässan. Jag kategoriserade in dem i artiklar efter namn, och sedan placerat samtliga i Category:People of Sweden så blir de lätta att hitta. // Fred Chess 23:28, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright of wax statues at Madame Tussaud's[edit]

Hello, I see you uploaded a number of photos of wax figures of Madame Tussaud's. You name Public Domain as the licende. It strikes me that a wax cabinet should use this licence – typically such works of modern art are copyrighted by their authors. Photographs of such items are thus covered by the copyright of the artist. Could you provide information on the copyright status of the wax figures you uploaded photos of? I'm worried they are not in line with the licence guidelines. --Wikipeder 16:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We had roughly the same discussion on Swedish Wikipedia, and I think that the result was that since the wax figures are on display in a fairly public place, pictures of them cannot be prohibited. I understand that the wax figures themselves are like work of art, and that may be a problem. If that is so, please let me know.//Hannibal 22:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hannibal,

This image was included in the article of Thunderball in spanish wikipedia. But, as you licenced it in the public domain we have to explain why is it a PD image, as the original author died in 1964. Please tell us if you have the reason of that licencing.

Best regards, --Fballesteros 16:48, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. This image is clearly not PD, since it is an artist's work. I can only explain my mistake by blaming enwiki, since their version of the same image is placed under pd by some sort of fair use. I uploaded it in sept 2005, and back then I wasn´t so careful with clear (i.e. copyright free) images. It should probably be deleted. Will you take care of it, please?//Hannibal 12:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Jack_Kevorkian.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Fred J 07:49, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Ilon Wikland.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, not sure if you are the one that the emails were sent to for permission regarding the above image, but if you are: Can you send on the email to permission-commons@wikimedia.org, this so it can be made official. Thanks in advance. Deadstar (msg) 12:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the person you should contact is en:User:Yamla who confirmed that the permission was granted, or en:User:Loadmaster who first inserted the picture in the enwp article. I merely copied it and uploaded it here with their descriptions of the picture.//Hannibal 16:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jessika_Gedin2.PNG. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ALE! ¿…? 11:08, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please send the permission to OTRS and put {{OTRS pending}} on the description page of the image. --ALE! ¿…? 11:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was precisely doin that when you wrote me ;-) //Hannibal 11:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Jessika_Gedin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Akissej 09:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Leif_Pagrotsky.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Hannibal 21:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Cinematographe Lumiere.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 17:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Sanna_Ehdin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Hannibal (talk) 22:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


We want to use this image on Seriewikin. Do we have your permission? You could contact me at 'mikke at sekvenskonst.com'

Bokmässan[edit]

Hej. Kategorin bör väl heta Category:Göteborg Book Fair 2008. Se Image:Logga bb.jpg (fast den bilden har en tveksam licens, och kanske bör raderas). Dessutom används "Göteborg" i alla andra Göteborgskategorier här. /Ö 09:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, du har nog rätt. Jag får fixa det. Fast nu måste jag äta.//Hannibal (talk) 09:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jag kan fixa det med bot så slipper ni krångla med att göra det för hand. //moralist (talk) 09:40, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sådärja. :) //moralist (talk) 09:49, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tack!//Hannibal (talk) 20:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sture Hegerfors[edit]

Hej Hannibal!

Vet du om att Tre Böcker har använt din bild på Sture Hegerfors (beskuren) i sitt reklammaterial för höstens nya böcker? Bilden är ju visserligen frisläppt, men ändå, har de frågat dig om lov? mvh Vogler (talk) 16:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nej, det har de inte gjort, men det behöver de inte heller. Finns det här på nätet?//Hannibal (talk) 20:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nej kan inte hitta detta på deras webplats, det var en liten reklamfolder som man kunde hämta i deras monter. Din bild var med som illustration till Hegerfors, men bilden var något beskuren. Om du vil kan jag skicka foldern med snigelmail eller skanna in den? /Vogler (talk) 13:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scanna gärna in den och skicka via mail, om du har tid. Har de skrivit med mitt namn?//Hannibal (talk) 18:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Hans Lindström.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know about the missing authorship. I will try to add more of these as soon as I can, but the rule of thumb is that I have taken the pictures I have uploaded, at least since 2007. The ones I haven't, I have provided author for.//Hannibal (talk) 15:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Riksarkivet[edit]

Hej. Jag omorganiserade Category:Regionarkivet så att informationen nu ligger på Commons:Regionarkivet och bilderna i Category:Images from Regionarkivet. Jag lämnade en notis på Category:Regionarkivet om detta men jag ska försöka jaga kvarvarande länkar. Om du gett några till Regionarkivet kan det vara bra att meddela dem om flytten. Förresten jag hittade bara 27 bilder, vad hände med #28? /Lokal_Profil 15:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Är File:Gegerfelt.jpg bild 28? /Lokal_Profil 15:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tack. Jag funderade på att göra så som du gjorde också, men hade redan fixat med pressmeddelandet och orkade inte ändra. Så länge det inte blir länkröta är det okej, men jag funderar på att lägga någon demonstrationsbild på Category:Regionarkivet. Och bild 28 är Gegerfelt som inte är i lika hög upplösning, men ändå skänkt av Regionarkivet. Den är dessutom inscannad och tillfixad enkom för det här. Har du förresten sett min mailfråga?//Hannibal (talk) 15:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Har nu märkt Gegerfeltbilden som "Images from Regionarkivet" också. Menar du en exempelbild på Category:Regionarkivet eller på Commons:Regionarkivet? Har svarat på mailet. /Lokal_Profil 16:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration?[edit]

Hi, would it be possible to get uncompressed versions of the images you've been uploading? I'd like to try restoration. Either TIFF or PNG, highest resolution available. Best regards, Durova (talk) 21:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded very high resolution tiffs for all pictures, except when the files were too big for Commons, but I have another guy that can fix those. See Category:Images from Regionarkivet. Thanks for helping out! /Hannibal (talk) 07:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! Will start with the Roman excavation. If any image is particularly meaningful to the institution or to the Swedish chapter, please let me know. Best regards, Durova (talk) 15:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For the book, please start with the most damaged pictures and work yourself upwards. Thanks.//Hannibal (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good news. Finished the Uriconium restoration and Wikimedia UK is using it in a press release.[1] Another editor is undertaking restoration on File:Wells Cathedral, South Aisle of Nave by Francis Bedford.jpg. Durova (talk) 13:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!//Hannibal (talk) 18:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. The English language edition of Wikipedia is likely to reach its 2000th featured picture this month. Your uploads are wonderful; will endeavor to time one of the restorations to become the landmark. The international cooperation should make a wonderful story. Please keep up the good work! Best regards, Durova (talk) 19:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think Durova did a great job. I have nominated it. --Ankara (talk) 18:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is great. I know Regionarkivet will be proud if it's accepted.//Hannibal (talk) 07:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another done. Durova (talk) 01:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

djvu[edit]

File:Så fungerar Wikipedia.djvu finns nu här om du vill fila på något i mallarna! -- Lavallen (talk) 19:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tack för den konverteringen./Hannibal (talk) 19:35, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:NM_Wiki_5d.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Haxpett (talk) 11:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aino_Trosell.JPG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aino_Trosell.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

MorganKevinJ(talk) 19:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry if I sound a little bit negative here, but if you had checked the description more closely you would have seen that it is a "own work", because it says "own work". If you had checked my other contributions from the same time you would have seen that it is part of a series of photographs that I took on the Gothenburg Book Fair, because it says so in the description. Do you have any reason to doubt these statements? If not, would it not have been kinder and more time effective to simply edit the image descriptions to add the template:own? Sorry if I sound a bit rude here: I am jetlagged.//216.38.130.167 00:52, 4 January 2011 (UTC) (which is Hannibal, but not logged in, on visit to the US)[reply]
File:Ambassadors_training_26.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ambassadors_training_25.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ambassadors_training_24.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ambassadors_training_14.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:37, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]