User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive35

About File:Coronel General Aleksandr Rodímtsev.jpg and also File:Ivan Petrov.jpg deletion

Hi EugeneZelenko! Well, about the permisiion of the photos, we can find it in the foot of the page where it was published here https://encyclopedia.mil.ru/encyclopedia/history/more.htm?id=12281734@cmsArticle; And here https://encyclopedia.mil.ru/encyclopedia/history/more.htm?id=12109371@cmsArticle

Greetings! --Eduviñasan (talk) 09:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

P.S. The photos had a Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional. Permission according to the informations available on the page. Thank you!

It's hard to tell if Ministry of Defense original author or not, since photos are historical and may be in public domain. At lease date of creation need to be find out. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't know if the Ministry of Defense is the author of the photos or not, but if the photos are on their website, it is obvious that they have the copyright to use those photos and according to the website itself, anyone can use them. About the date of creation, it's hard to tell but, I think both photos are about 1945, just after the end of the Second World War or later. --Eduviñasan (talk) 21:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

You didn't convince me about authorship. Date of creation is also not-obvious. For me it looks like made in 1960s-1970s. Unfortunately photo's resolution is in not enough to see rank and awards clearly. Otherwise this article may help to make better guess. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok. in the case of Ivan Petrov he got his medal of Hero of the Soviet Union in 1945 and died in 1958, so it's impossible that the photo was made in 60s, as you say. In the case of Aleksandr Rodímtsev he got his second medal of Hero of the Soviet Union in 1945 again, but died in the 70s so it's possible that the photo was made in 60s as you say. But I do not understand why you are being so intransigent, there are a lot of photos in Wikipedia that come from the website of the Russian Ministry of Defense and can be used without problems, why are these photos different?

The photo of the article that you put is previous, since the rank that he has is Colonel General (he has two stars on the shoulder pads) and he has two medals of Hero of the Soviet Union so the photo is between 1945 and 1961. but the rank in the photo that I put is Lieutenant General (he has three stars on the shoulder pads) so the photo is after 1961

Eduviñasan (talk) 17:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

I looked only Rodimtsev photo. See article about Petrov which contain list of awards that may be helpful to guess photo creation time. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

ok in this case the resolution of the photo is very poor, but I think the photo is around 1945, because you can see that he only has three Orders of Lenin and he was awarded his fourth Orders of Lenin in 1950, and It is also seen that he has three Orders of the Red Flag and again he got his fourth medal in 1948, so the photo I think is between 1945, when he got his Hero of the Soviet Union medal and 1948, when he got his fourth Order of the Flag Red. I hope that now everything is clear and there is no more problem. Eduviñasan (talk) 21:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

About File:StefanJanovjak 01.jpg deletion

Hello Eugene, those photos are comming from family archiv or family book. I just took a photo with mobile. I am junior in wiki, so please advice how to tag it correctly. General links on help pages are not helping me. Thank you, Sincerely, Jancimusic --Jancimusic (talk) 07:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

You need to find out information about original photographer or at least approximate date of creation. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

The photographer was my father or some of my uncles around 1954. --Jancimusic (talk) 07:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jancimusic (talk • contribs) 07:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

You need to find out exactly. Are you only heir of your father? You could also ask permission from your uncle heir(s). See Commons:OTRS and Commons:Email templates. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Eugene, my father died in 1972, I only got the Family book, I dont understand your point.--Jancimusic (talk) 17:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

My point is that copyrights are inherited like any other property. Only lawful heir could give permission. If several heirs are involved, each of them must do this. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Eugene, I have corrected the author attribute. I cant ask my dead father for any rights, cause I inheritetd them after his death by law. I hope this is understandable and you will dismiss the warning. If you have any other proposal for any other correction, please advice, I will be happy to do--Jancimusic (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC).

From you first reply it was unclear who was photographer. This needs to be sorted out. You also didn't answer my question: are you only heir of your father? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Eugene, Yes I have it cleared, it was my father. Yes I am the only one. If you feel you need anything more, feel free to ask for it.--Jancimusic (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Please send copyrights ownership confirmation with authorship/inheritance details to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Eugene, I have sent it. Take care.--Jancimusic (talk) 21:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

About File:Maria Angelica Granados Trespalacios.png deletion

Hi EugeneZelenko! Well, about the permisiion of the photo, we can find it in the foot of the page where it was published here: http://www.municipiochihuahua.gob.mx/Presidencia

Greetings!

P.S. The photo had a Creative Commons 3.0 Permission according to the informations available on the page. Thank you!

--EddieBurciaga (talk) 01:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't notice license statement. I removed template. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Qdesq Logo.png

You recently deleted File:Qdesq Logo.png in response to a speedy tag. Please close the deletion request for this file, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Qdesq Logo.png. You may have overlooked this as the uploader had deleted the delete template from the file page. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing to my mistake!  Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The file has been re-uploaded and I have added a Speedydelete tag. Verbcatcher (talk) 09:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Túrelio (talk · contribs). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Syed Abul Faiz Qalandar Ali Soharwardi.jpg source

Hi EugeneZelenko,

I see you asked for the source of the image, while it was already mentioned via `source = Own work`. I have updated the description line to explicitly acknowledge that the image is my sole work.

Please review or guide if I have to do anything further.

Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by HamzaWaqas (talk • contribs) 19:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

You could upload photo in original camera resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Antoine RIGAUX

Do what you want, pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakinboaz357 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

You uploaded images created by other people, so they are obviously not your own works. However images may be in public domain, see Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

MIGRACIÓN A EE.UU. EN 1920. Campillo de Llerena. Badajoz

Como ya comenté el 21 de enero pasado, mis conocimientos del idioma inglés son limitado. Lo siento, pero me expresaré en español. Supongo que no habrá problemas de traducción. De nuevo recibo aviso, ahora de JuTa, de que las fotos pueden ser borradas por desconocimiento de autor. Repito que una de ellas es de mi abuelo, Joaquín Rubio Pizarro y las otras de familiares. Fueron enviadas desde Nueva Jersey o Nueva York a principios de los años 20 del siglo pasado a sus familiares en España. Es imposible conocer quien las hizo, pero seguro que no tienen derechos de autor. Las tengo yo en propiedad. Puedo aportar documentos de su estancia en USA. Incluso datos de donde está enterrado mi abuelo en Nueva Jersey. Hagan lo que crean que proceda. Yo no entiendo estas exigencias. Gracias. Thank you.--Atilanocarrasco (talk) 19:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Spanish. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States to find out if images in public domain or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Invicta file

Salve ho notato che ha inseito delle segnalazioni in merito al copyright di alcune foto mi riferisco in particolare alla foto File:Invictapotenza3.webp la foto in questione non è in violazione di copyright e vorrei sapere perchè ha inserito comunque l'avviso. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poppopoppo (talk • contribs) 21:57, 30 January 2021 (UTC) --Poppopoppo (talk) 21:57, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Italian :-( It's unclear from description what is source of this image. You could upload photo in original camera resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Russia Handball Federation

Hi, what kind of argument is "non-trivial logo" for deleting a logo? What makes a logo non-trivial? --Sb008 (talk) 09:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

This particular logo doesn't fit {{PD-textlogo}}: it's not plain text/geometric forms. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

I don't get it, the {{PD-textlogo}} says: "This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text.". How can image which meets that criteria, i.e. consisting only of simple geometric shapes or text, and be, as you say, "not plain text/geometric forms" at the same time? So it has to consist only of simple geometric shapes or text and at the same time not to be of of plain/simple geometric forms. Sounds to me like ssaying it has to qualify, but it doesn't qualify because it qualifies. I always thought I, with a college degree in match, knew a bit about logic, but this kind of logic is totally new to me. Wouldn't it be easier to say "no image will ever qualify" since it's impossible to be and not to be at the same time? --Sb008 (talk) 09:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, English is not my native tongue. I wanted to say that this particular logo is not {{PD-textlogo}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

So basically logo's of sport associations are not allowed? To mention a few, and these are only those which are football related:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• File:Federata Shqiptare e Futbollit.svg
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• File:Guyana logo.svg
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• File:Naujas-lff-rinktiniu-simbolis-modernizuotas-vytis-5f50bda1a8384-removebg-preview (1) (1).png
• 
• 
• File:Rdc logo foot.png
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• File:Yemen Football Association Logo.svg

--Sb008 (talk) 17:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Some of them {{PD-textlogo}}, some - copies of state coats of arms that are exempted from copyrights. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Re: Pronunciation file names

Ok. Manandez (talk) 16:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Re: Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2021-01-25-AS-RR Belege zum Zille-Programm, UA 1975.pdf

Hallo EugeneZelenko! Da ich erst kürzlich zum Wikipedia-Autor geworden bin, bewege ich mich noch sehr unsicher im Gesamtsystem der Wikipedia samt aller zugehörigen Projekte, um all die geforderten Richtlinien, Templates, Diskussionsseiten, Links etc. korrekt anzuwenden und um dabei den eigentlichen Inhalt meines Artikels nicht aus den Augen zu verlieren. Ich habe für o.a. File die Quellen der eingebundenen Fotos/Dokumente detailliert angeführt. Ich bin mir aber in keiner Weise sicher, ob das so richtig ist. Wie in der Beschreibung zum obigen File angegeben, bin ich, Rena Cori, Erbe der Künstlerin, um die es im zugehörigen Wikipedia-Artikel geht. Bitte teile mir mit, ob für dieses File meine Arbeit korrekt war. Wenn ja, werde ich dies für die beiden anderen Files entsprechend nachziehen. Wenn nicht, dann bin ich im Moment am Ende meines Lateins und ersuche dich, mir zu zeigen, wie's geht. Vielen Dank --Rena Cori (talk) 10:38, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know German :-( Files you uploaded are scans of historical publications, so they are not your own work. However they may be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer. And sorry that I wrote in German, but I would explain my problems in the right words. In the meantime I've thought about a new method of prooving my article text in Wikipedia. Thank you oncemore, Yours sincerely --Rena Cori (talk) 22:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Backlog

Hi. DR from August, last year. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 16:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Works based in free licence maps

@EugeneZelenko: , I recieved your emails about the erase of my maps's works. I thought that the attribute licence Datos del Mapa ©2021 Google, INEGI was the correct, but no (I see), sorry me!. I will use the free maps and licences from OpenStreetMap - Estándar. I hope that with these new designs with these free maps you will not erase them! Thanks. Yours truly. Fernando de Gorocica (talk) 18:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear EugeneZelenko

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

About File: Zatikiak.webm

Hello EugeneZelenko!

This video is the original work done by one of my students at the university. He couldn't upload it, so I do it for him. I don't understand what you want me to change. If you can explain it better, please, I would appreciate it.

Thank you,

Haritz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haritzip (talk • contribs) 17:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Obviously it's not you own work. Also video uses some clip-art and music. Are both freely-licensed? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Korpiklaani's Jylhä artwork

Hey Eugene, sorry about the problem with the artwork. I'm new at this, so I wanted to ask how can I upload something under the Fair Use? (I believe this is the option for album covers and stuff like that) I could use some help to get my pages better. Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelus Vieira Burkert (talk • contribs) 19:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Non-free media allowed in some WMF projects like English Wikipedia and must be uploaded locally there. Commons has other requirements. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

The Next Africa book cover image deletion

Hi Eugene Can you please undelete The Next Africa Cover.jpg that was deleted from The Next Africa wikipedia book page. This is not a copyright restricted image. It is the public book cover image released by the publisher (Macmillan/Thomas Dunne) for all commercial and public informational purposes related to the book. A Google image search indicates it was widely used and released to the public: https://www.google.com/search?q=the+next+africa&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwiM2db3ztjuAhVBBd8KHWqADLMQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=the+next+africa&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzIECCMQJzIECCMQJzIECAAQGDIECAAQGDIECAAQGDIECAAQGFDWS1iUUWCLU2gAcAB4AIABWIgB3wOSAQE2mAEAoAEBqgELZ3dzLXdpei1pbWfAAQE&sclient=img&ei=DE4gYIyjPMGK_AbqgLKYCw&bih=722&biw=1536&rlz=1C1JZAP_enUS935US935 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manitou1 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Availability on something on Internet doesn't assume license compatible with Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

The Next Africa book cover image notices

Hi Eugene, Addressing your additional notations to images used on The Next Africa book page (have included your comments in brackets below). Hopefully we can address most of that here. 1. For the WorlDenver image, it came from one of several event images links related to the event released for public use. Here's one of those links: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.995856217177565.1073741891.238242156272312&type=3 2. On the Kenyan Vibe image, seeking written permission from the editor of that site. 3. On the WorldAffairs Council SF image, checked and it was a public event and that image was taken by someone in attendance at the event and given to the authors of The Next Africa for use on social media. Please advise how to handle permission on that. 4. On the C-Span image, it would appear it would be covered by C-Span's terms and conditions here: https://www.c-span.org/about/termsAndConditions/

Please advise. Thanks.

[This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading File:Aubrey Hruby, Bitange Ndemo, Erik Hersman at 2015 iHub Kenya The Next Africa book event in Nairobi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{OTRS pending}} on file description page. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. And also:

File:Jake Bright signs copies of The Next Africa at WorldDenver event in 2016.jpg File:The Next Africa Jake Bright Aubrey Hruby World Affairs Council San Francisco.jpg File:The Next Africa Jake Bright Aubrey Hruby C-Span Book TV @ The Atlantic Council.png Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)] {{unsigned2|21:21, 7 February 2021|Manitou1}]

Non-free images such as TV screenshots

Hi,

The majority of television series on Wikipedia have a picture of their title card. Which is the correct licence for such images as I have tried to upload the title card for River City but have had no luck. Please accept my sincere apologies and I do not wish to breach any copyright rules. Goodreg3 (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Non-free media allowed in some WMF projects like English Wikipedia and must be uploaded locally there. Commons has other requirements. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Right, but how do you upload them to English wikipedia? Doesn't all images on Wikipedia have to be uploaded via Wikimedia commons? Can you advise on how to do this? Goodreg3 (talk) 00:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Never mind, figured it out. Goodreg3 (talk) 00:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Borneo maps.png

I'm sorry, you are right. It is an image supposed to be deleted asap (as a matter of fact it's just a totally useless screenshot) needed in a discussion on the appropriateness of a Borneo map and I did not know how to share it in a different way --Lichinga (talk) 16:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Link to Google Maps should be enough. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello EugeneZelenko,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

User:Dannywithay's uploads

Hi EugeneZelenko. You previously deleted a bunch of files uploaded by Dannywithay per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dannywithay, but they've uploaded some more similar files which I've tagged as copyvios. The editor never posted any comments in the aformentioned DR, but it seems as if they simply don't understand COM:L. It's possible they are mistaking something being posted on Facebook as "public" and, thus, OK to upload to Commons. This could be just a good faith misunderstanding; so, I'm a bit reluctant to hit them with an {{End of copyvios}} template just yet. So, I'm wondering if there's a more friendly type of user warning template which could be used instead. English Wikipedia, for example, has some user warning templates for different levels, with level-1 templates being used for a first warning and level-4 templates being used for a final warning. Does Commons have something similar that could be used in a case like this? -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

You could leave message in plain text. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

That's what I thought about doing. I was just curious if there was a template as well. Thanks for taking a look. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

I tried posting a friendly message about this on their user talk page, but they blanked the page without comment. That's OK, but I guess it means no more warnings if they continue to upload questionable files. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Halpero

Dear EugeneZelenko

Please explain me what is wrong with files mentioned on User talk:Halpero. The pictures were taken and uploaded by my mother, she is 83 now. Could you please restore the files, so she could add missing information? --Perohanych (talk) 08:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Please ask her to send authorship confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Who is the author

Hy, EugeneZelenko. You has marked my File yesterday, because I whould need a permission of the author. But I am the author. Thats why I dont understand the problem. --Mr. Schnellerklärt (talk) 19:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

File is poster as well as Commons:Derivative works from historical photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

File:1685 Map of Lyminge by Thomas Hill.jpg

This is my own photograph of a 1685 map. It has no reason to be deleted. Cantiana (talk) 19:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Please read w:en:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.. You need to fix license tag. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Rate Limit for my Bot

Hello, I'm currently upload GLAM material from The Utrecht Archives with my bot 'CompanjeBot'. If I'm correct you granted this bot a 'BotFlag' which should make it easier to upload large amounts of images. Unfortunately I get the error 'Upload Error ratelimited You've exceeded your rate limit. Please wait some time and try again.' Do you maybe know a solution? Otherwise uploading our collection will take me months I'm affraid. --Companje (talk) 14:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I could not answer such question easily. mw:Manual:$wgRateLimits doesn't looks like there are any special user group. Also user rights page doesn't list rights that may mean exclusion from rate limit. I think you should try to ask other mass uploaders like User:Fæ through I don't see any special rights in his case as well as for User:Faebot. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Uploading a million files has taken me more than 3 months. Having a bot flag doesn't change the way it works.

It is a good thing to take months rather than days, as volunteers can work on the collection and raise issues before it's all finished. You could create a sock-farm and bypass any limits, but it's not normal practice. Once it's running, it only needs monitoring, so the calendar time is slightly irrelevant.

Oh, to be fair I do use the multiprocessing features of Python, so do sometimes do faster stuff, but normally for fast non-controversial housekeeping jobs, or multiple upload attempts in parallel when the WMF servers are not behaving well, but not in general for first uploads of collections.

I've also never seen the 'rate limit' error, only messages waiting for a lag to expire. It may be related to your upload methods, not just a group added to your account. If you are still stuck, ask at COM:VPT with a bit more technical info. --Fæ (talk) 20:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I am not sure

Greetings: I closed some Deletion Nominations and afterwards researched this image for real search since metadata showed Library of Congress: File:Rashid street-baghad-c.1920s.jpg. It dates to 1932. But I have no indication of publication. If you want to renominate it, I will not say a word to keep it. It's just such a lovely image and the sourcing is now solid, so I wanted you to look again. If you have a chance, can you close some Deletion Nominations from May 2020? Many of the remaining are mine and I can't close my own nominations! Thank you ever so much!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Photo was claimed to be own work when I nominated it for deletion, so source/license information seems fine for me. I'll try to help with old nominations closure, but I have hard time with keeping up with current maintenance :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Sarpsborg Beer Collection.jpg

Why was this image deleted? I took it myself in my studio. --Magnus Schaft (talk) 07:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Ric 1967 pictures on Slavka Taskova page and Pier Paolo Paoletti page

Hi Eugene thanks for your notes. I agree on some details such as the record cover on Taskova page " Como una ola de fuerza y luz", this is the pic of a record cover, but the other pictures are self taken by the singer husband in case of Taskova and by the doctor's collaborators themselves in the Pier Paolo Paoletti page. This to say that those pics are all copyright free becuase basically self produced by the talents themselves. In the metadata some of them are coming from an i-phone because it was faster than scanning old paper pictures. I am new to wiki , it is difficult for me to understand where to write this info , can you help me? i do not understand where to edit to add info on the origin of the pics. it is very complicated and not very user friendly. happy to update but i need a guidance, please think that you are talking to a wiki dummy :) Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ric1967 (talk • contribs) 09:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC) Ric1967 (talk) 09:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

File pages could be edited like any other wiki page, so changes are not so difficult. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country - some photos may be in public domain. You could also try to get permission from copyrights holder - see Commons:OTRS and Commons:Email templates. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Dear Eugene I worked on the pictures you mentioned. I think they are ok now, and I also removed the record cover pic. Thanks --Ric1967 (talk) 18:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

You could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Корица на БЯЛА КНИГА ПО ЕЗИКОВИЯ СПОР МЕЖДУ БЪЛГАРИЯ И РС МАКЕДОНИЯ.jpg

Hi, I see I'll have to provide a copyright tag for this file, but it's been deleted and I can't edit it. I made an undelete request for it, is it enough to proceed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAlcostar (talk • contribs) 16:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Answered on Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:БЯЛА КНИГА - финален пълен вариант.pdf. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

File:БЯЛА КНИГА - финален пълен вариант.pdf

Yes, the Book is a collective work of 8 authors, I am one of them and represent the whole collective. How can I grant Permissions for all authors and publisher? Is there a template or a form? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAlcostar (talk • contribs) 16:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Each author must send permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Aldous Huxley - Selected poems.pdf

"Aldous Huxley died in 1963" Hello, Eugene! Why it is not enough that the book was PRINTED IN USA (country of origin?) and the book IS Public Domain in USA due to it was printed in 1925 (though the author died less than 70 years ago)?--2.92.194.0 18:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

No. Aldous Huxley is British author, so British law must apply too. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Simulazione Casello Autostradale.ogv

Dear EugeneZelenko,

The media you have deleted is a work of mine. I have done it for the project Wiki-imparare form Wikimedia Italia (see https://www.wikimedia.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Bando-2020-WIKI-IMPARARE.pdf).

Can you help me with the missing information in order to restore the media?

Thank you and bye,

--Geppetto (88's dog) (talk) 10:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

What is source/license for background music? Please also read Commons:Derivative works to understand problem. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: I'm Giacomo Alessandroni, the teacher of Geppetto (88's dog). I encourage my pupils to use the Wikimedia environment, but they done a lot of mistakes, as you can see. So, the soundtrack is Ocean View, by Patrick Patrikios (from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayr1hRKH9Zg). About the license, I read "No Copyright Audio Library" and "Music without copyright - Attribution not required." so I propose: Music CC-BY Patrick Patrikios, Ocean View, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayr1hRKH9Zg. Is it right? --Galessandroni (talk) 16:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Attribution is not required, so BY is not needed. However, will be good idea to clarify with author if derivative works are allowed. By the word, it'll be good idea to suggest composer to use one of Creative Commons licenses explicitly, just to avoid our guesses :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

The authors (in the YouTube channel) have written "You're free to use this song and monetize your video.". In my opinion is a good practics to cite the author. In the chat below the video there is this explicit question:

- LawaGaming (1 month ago) I can use this music to my YT videos ?

- No Copyright Audio Library (1 month ago) Read Description -> You're free to use this song and monetize your video.

So, the licence seem CC0, But I prefer using a CC-BY. And now the true question: do I ask to my student to upload again the video without music, or citing the author?

Galessandroni (talk) 18:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Use is ambiguous definition. It may allow creation of derivative work or may not. See w:en:Creative Commons license for -ND. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for all. Final decision: I'll ask to my student to upload a new file without soundtrack (or with a CC soundtrack). Thank you and bye, Galessandroni (talk) 09:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi

Hi there. Anything new under the blue sky that is worth to keep here? --E4024 (talk) 02:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Frankly, I'd like to delegate decisions in such matters to doctors (I'm not one). Pathological conditions and deceases may be in Commons:Project scope, but it's hard to find pearls in heap of trash. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

File:N. THEOBALD, Fig. 5 Aquisextana Irenaei.pdf

Bonjour, Depuis quelques jours, j'essaie de justifier mes droits d'auteur sur ce fichier. Il a été établi d'après une photo et un dessin publiés dans l'article: "Note complémentaire sur les insectes fossiles oligocènes des gypses d'Aix-en-Provence", pubié par Nicolas Théobald dans le Bulletin de la Société des Sciences de Nanvy, n°6, juin 1937, p. 157-178, 2 planches, 7 fig. Je, Mireille Théobald, épouse Darmois, née le 6 Février 1939 à Obernai (Bas-Rhin), France, certifie sur l'honneur être dépositaire des droits d'auteur de mon père Nicolas Théobald, décédé le 10 Mai 1981.Mireille Théobald (talk) 16:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know French :-( Are you only heir of your father? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

I am heiress of the rights on the scientific works of my father Nicolas Théobald. After his death, I recieved money paid by his Editors. That is wy I try to publish a synthesis of his work on Wikipedia. For the illustration, I versed first 3 files: Nicolas Théobald, Aquisextana Irenaei; Terrasses emboîtées ou étagées, M. Darmois-Théobald et Y. Rangheard; Thèse de Nicolas Théobald, pl.II, Insectes du Sannoisien du Gard. As my Wikipedian tutor found that these pictures were too "grey", I versed 3 more files with white back (?) and different names to avoid confusion. These are: Terrasses alluviales Fig.1 et 2, T. emboîtées Fig. 3, T. étagées ; N.THEOBALD, Fig.4 Fac-similé Pl II Thèse 1937 ; N. THEOBALD, Fig. 5 Aquisextana Irenaei.

I hope you will accept my Declaration on Honnor to be truly depositary of the rights on my father's works.--Mireille Théobald (talk) 17:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Please send such confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). If your father had other heir(s), additional permissions are needed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

About my files

Eugene, I beg you not to remove the files. I was definitely the one who captured them from the wikipedia commons by filling out the form. I'm sorry some are similar to mine, but don't think that's copyright. Ric Aries (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

You could upload photos in original camera resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Interpress source book

Why is an image of a book cover a copyright violation? It's a photo of a two-dimensional object. Peter Flass (talk) 16:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Source allowed permission for copyright

Hello User:EugeneZelenko. You've warned me about an image permission. File:Pentagram-muzikonair.jpg. But i have a permission mail from the web source. and i forwarded the mail to "info-tr@wikimedia.org". --Metakafa (talk) 08:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

It's hard to tell how well original permission was written. I would recommend you to ask copyrights holder to send one based on Commons:Email templates. You could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Carel Bel

Hello EugeneZelenko. You gave me the message that "the source of derivative word is not properly indicated". Could you help me with this? The foto's are from the family archive (from my father and uncle, it concerns their father and mother, my grandfather and grandmother), I got a copy of it. I'm not that familiar with wikipedia. My grandfather and grandmother don't live anymore. I didn't succeed to give the photo's the proper indication, I don't know how to do that. I would appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MBB1969 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

You need to find out information about photographer(s) or at least approximate date of creation. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you EugeneZelenko, I asked my father if he knew the name of the photographer, that was my Grandfather himself (he passed away) or the portret Photographer in de village of my grandfather (passed away). As the portret photo's were bought by my grandfather and has been inhereted by my father, the rights belong to my father / family. I still don't know how to indicate that the right way. Could you help me out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MBB1969 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Is you father only heir of his father? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

S. Thomas

Hi. Ppsasi, other than uploading copyvios, is an sp. I waited a couple of days to see if they would be a good Commoner this time, but in vain. FYI. --E4024 (talk) 17:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

It may be reasonable to file request on Commons:Requests for checkuser. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

The topic is about removing the image of the actor Ahmed Mohareb

Hello Mr.EugeneZelenko I think that there is something wrong with the picture that you are talking about. Yes, it is not widespread in Google because it is a personal picture of the actor, but if you want to modify another image that exists on many sites on Google, I will amend it, you can see that image in Google to confirm what I say to you

https://www.google.com.eg/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiv_1kWT5tmG_1apOfdvTJxqh25sIujejPKfwVQERdarsJpNRUc88yTY6YzcAa0TUhqoX9zQVjMd9S41LoEXkYV9pYmNbmBC2SfInt51RbGUiwcrhNJkxGtAkDOZBcM_1VFl61RSDc5xsstnPJ1IMlfbbQqEMkWR-GMM7QmnMXJBwOmtQqWVaXEdL_1jiEUahM44c1LS9kpPpfCcmx8ID5_1DYcrQILkmkh8V8rDB2TmorstC-uG98OM81YGn3LZSVg1Ntutgf-TzIJgHEfnc9PA2JoiOcZGoJ2lCq_1mCLVJe0A7Wd4ibIBzqs1NBxhuDWrbN6GUeIMCcJ7z1HzMaYhjOi1t0dF3Npg&hl=ar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youssefmsm4 (talk • contribs) 11:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC) ____________________________ and this from Official website elcinema.com https://elcinema.com/person/2028060/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youssefmsm4 (talk • contribs) 12:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Availability of something on Internet doesn't assume license compatible with Commons. Please read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Time to say good-bye to some DRs?

Like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iraq 2016.jpg or this one? Thx. --E4024 (talk) 18:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Deleted first one. In second case user uploaded several other photos of same nature, so all requests must be closed simultanously. I'm not sure about notability of subject, so may be photos should be just cropped with deletion of original versions? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Ilka Gedo Images

This is to inform you that I am the son of Ilka Gedő, and I am the copyright holder despite the fact that many of the works of Ilka Gedő are in public collections now. These public collections have not been granted full and exclusive copyright over the works, they have only been allowed by me to publish the works in their onw museum publications.

--David Biro (talk) 17:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Are you only heir? If not, other heir(s) must send permission(s) too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

File Katarzyna Czajka-Kominiarczuk

Hi, I am waiting for OTRS signed by the author of this photo :) I have also informed Polish OTRS team. Klarqa (talk) 17:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

With regrds to Ilka Gedo email sent

[Ticket#2021030810010858] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Ilka Gedö (1921-1985 [...])

David Biro (talk) 18:37, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

About photos from argentina.gob.ar

Hello EugeneZelenko, I have a question about File:Avión casa 212 del ejército argentino (AE-264) durante carga 2020.png, photos from web argentina.gob.ar (official web form argentina government) are license creative commons argentina.gob.ar cc-by-sa-4.0 ("El Administrador licencia todos sus contenidos bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, cuyo texto legal puede encontrarse en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es, excepto cuando se declare lo contrario." -> The Administrator licenses all its contents under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, the legal text of which can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es, except when stated otherwise.), and there are another photos from the same web in creative commons, do you need specific license for every photo from this web or that is enough? Thanks AlbertoDV (talk) 16:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Yes, filling permission field in {{Information}} is definitely helpful. But please fix license (CC-BY, not CC-BY-SA). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Creating Commons LOGO cropped-cropped-cc2-positiv single-8.png

Simple logo and not copyrighted. It should not be deleted under current regulations. You are again acting as trigger happy. This gives Commons bad reputation. -- Zblace (talk) 15:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Please read nomination text. It tells about Commons:Project scope, not copyrights matters. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

It says nothing specific (except for being formulated as an insult), but just a generic technical statement (sure .svg is better). -- Zblace (talk) 20:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

It's clearly refer to one of project rules, Commons:Project scope. I don't see anything insulting in nomination text. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

You wrote trivial and questionable notability...what else you should say about 3 year international science and art project funded by Swiss national science fund to actually become insulting? It is not clear how research on Digital Commons and Creativity is outside of scope of Wikimedia that is digital commons itself and builds on participatory and creative work. Please explain yourself / this is not the first time you act and communicate so benevolent. You really add to hostile atmosphere and bad reputation of Wikimedia projects. -- Zblace (talk) 11:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stick to rational arguments and hold your emotions (that appear not for a first time during this discussion as well as on Wikidata). If you know particular project, this fact doesn't assume that it's known for entire world. So you need to explain why project is notable (how many people works on it, what is audience, etc) and not on this discussion, but on deletion nominations. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

About File:Nsfnet paisley map.pdf - Permission Sent to OTRS

I proactively had the owner of the file go to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_OTRS_release_generator. Can you please check there for her release? She did it on the 10th (confirmed by email to me at 9:36 AM) so it may have been received after you put the note in the file. Thanks for all of the work you do administrating Wikimedia Commons. --StainlessSteelRat (talk) 07:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have OTRS access. Please ask ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Janusz Jarosławski 2.jpg deletion

Hello EugeneZelenko, I am the author of this photo and I have all rights to it. I request to leave it! --178.42.255.110 21:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Olek1992 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Derivative works to understand problem. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Kaddish.pdf File:Benedizioni e canti per Chanukkah Traslitterati.pdf File:Haggadah di Pesach Traslitterata.pdf File:Tu Bishvat.pdf

File:Benedizioni e canti per Chanukkah.pdf File:Haggadah di Pesach.pdf ==

An undelete is required for arbitrary cancellation specified before Passover: requesting the cancellation of Passower's files always in the month before Easter (this is already the third time), since these are files that do not violate any rules, it is not correct.

The release license is specifically compatible with Wikimedia and the files are developed and published specifically on Wikimedia to be available in the pages of Wikipedia in Italian and in Hebrew and in all languages that publish pages of Judaism to which the images and the works can relate.

Immediate reintegration of files and reintegration in all pages of the various Wikipedia languages that already published them are required

Thank you

Joram (talk) 23:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Project scope. Wiki-text version may be useful for Wikipedia or Wikibooks. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

File: Robinson Crusoe's route across the Pyrenees mountains.jpg

This uses as background an image which itself is in Wikimedia Commons. Everything else in the image I uploaded is my own work. I've added a source info note in what I hope is the appropriate place. Alan Mattingly (talk) 18:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

This file could not be claimed own work, because it's based on other people's work. Please also note discrepancies over licenses. Please fix these issues. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Vibration

Bonsoir,

Vous avez supprimé toutes mes images au sujet de la vibration. C'est pour le droit d'auteur ? C'est peut-être de la défense Pikachu, mais la version Nintendo 64 existe toujours. [1]

Shadow-M-P (talk) 20:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know French :-( Your uploads were of inconsistent resolutions, without EXIF and could be found on other web sites, so unlikely to be your own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Codice etico Riviera dei Tramonti.pdf

pdf document inserted as an image, useful for explaining the environmental issues that the Riviera dei Tramonti deals with. I apologize if you consider it irrelevant or to be deleted. Thanks for the warning, anyway. Hope to be in the proper space to answer, if not I'm sorry again, I don't understand how to reply to EugeneZelenko. --FedericaG rizzo (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)FedericaG rizzo

Why such issues could not be described in article itself with external link to more detailed information? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Strongbow ciders.jpg

Why did you delete my image? I created it, and it's not a derivative work. If you need the proof, here it is. Thank you Baoothersks (talk) 04:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Did you read Commons:Derivative works to understand what does it mean? Main subject of photo is cans and other products packaging, so are not only entity involved in copyrights of photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Kalimoun images

Hello EugeneZelenko.

I received with great interest your comments on the images I uploaded to illustrate the articles I created. Indeed, these images are my creations from book extracts, book covers, football team logos, modified photos of personalities, football teams, and other creations. I have added the copyright clause "self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all" to all of these images, and I hope that the great effort I have put into their creation will not be in vain, and that they will not be deleted. I await your further advice and guidance to complete the data of these images so that they are in line with the standards of Wikipedia Commons.

Cordially. --Kalimoun (talk) 11:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, scanning/taking photo of other works doesn't make you an author, so your copyrights claims are invalid. Sport club logos obviously belong to clubs. However some images may be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Книга Стальное колечко.jpg

Dear Eugene Zelenko!

My nickname is Саша 4х4 and I am a new user on Wikipedia. I think that we had a little misunderstanding about materials that I iclude in my artickles. On the first and second pages I wrote about Ерёмина Татьяна Алексеевна and Брантман Александр Моисеевич as I am their grandchild so, I have all the rights to post that photos and documents from my archives. On the third page I wrote about Гесс де Кальве Станислав Борисович, he was my uncle and this also means that I can post all the materials. All the photos were from my family private archives and were not posted anywhere. Which another way can I proof that I have all the rights for that documents and how can I protect them from deleting?

Thank you for your time! Sicerely, Саша 4х4.

File:Фотография Дейнеки А.А..jpg File:Еремина Т.А..jpg File:Художественный институт изобразительных искусств 1934 год. Второй курс под руководством Крымова Н.П..jpg File:Отправка на фронт.jpg File:Брантман А.М..jpg File:Одесса кинооператоры.jpg File:Эстония МАДИ 01.jpg File:Гесс де Кальве.jpg File:Москвич 412 Гесса де Кальве.jpg File:МАДИ 0213.01.jpg File:ГЛ24.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Саша 4х4 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

How many heir(s) did Ерёмина Татьяна Алексеевна, Брантман Александр Моисеевич and Гесс де Кальве Станислав Борисович had? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:37, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Those who know how to use a computer to post information on Wikipedia, I'm the only one ...) Саша 4х4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Саша 4х4 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

What is matter is copyrights ownership, not proficiency in using software. Also fact of photo in family archive could not assume that it could not be made by outside photographer(s). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

I have fully verified rights to dispose of the archives of these people. Including copyright for the objects of their creativity. Which allows me to conclude contracts for the republishing of their works. I made changes to the information on the graphic materials that were used in wikipedia. Do you think this is enough? Саша 4х4 (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Please ask all copyrights holders to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Error

Hello,

Tanks to cancel images to conference Rio (cinema) and file Pierre Eugène sur Film en Prose published by error in my brouillon --StanyH (talk) 00:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Please delete...

Dear User:EugeneZelenko, please delete the unfree image found in the versions history of File:Petros Philippidis.jpg uploaded by blocked User:Γιάννης_Ευαγγελίου. I am writing to you, as you are the one who blocked him. --FocalPoint (talk) 06:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

About File:Branka Bogdanov.png and others

File:Awarded authors with members of the jury from the 6th prize competition of the Association of Jewish Communities of Yugoslavia, November 25, 1960.jpg File:Sixty-three years of the Prize Competition of the Federation of Jewish Communities.pdf File:Ženi Lebl.jpg File:Alkalaj Moša-Bukus.jpg File:Mirjana Lehner - Dragić.png File:Sima Karaoglanović.jpg File:Jewish officers of the army of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, prisoners of war in the Osnabrück camp, in front of the "Jewish" barrack number 37.jpg File:Jews in the Serbian theatre.pdf File:Leon Koen (Kojen).png File:Dida De Majo.png File:Aleksandar Demajo.png File:Teodor Kovač.jpg File:Contribution to the material for the history of Jews of Kruševac.pdf File:Jews in the wars for the freedom of Serbia 1912–1918.pdf

Hello EugeneZelenko, Thank you for pointing out the problem with permissions. I am a Wikipedian intern at the Jewish Digital Library, and I posted these files in agreement with them. I put OTRS in the above files. Each file is located on their site under license 4.0. If necessary, we can be sent an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS.

(Tam Jankovic (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC))

Please read Commons:Licensing carefully: not all of Creative Commons licenses are accepted. For example, File:Branka Bogdanov.png is {{Cc-by-nc-nd-4.0}} on source site. I'm not sure how single OTRS could solve this issue if photographs were not made by museum itself. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi there

Hi. If you can spare a minute, can you kindly close this DR please? many thanks. --E4024 (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Neda.sajedi

Hi EugeneZelenko. Please note with respect to your nomination at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Neda.sajedi (where I have commented), that I have created a nomination for all other files uploaded by this user, at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Neda.sajedi. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:07, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Al Williamson

Hello, I probably made a mistake when I upload the file Al Williamson.jpg. The Licence is Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Générique and is clearly noted. Did I miss something ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olivier Tanguy (talk • contribs) 21:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

This is historical photo, not modern shot, so Creative Commons license is very doubtful. However it may be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

I found this photo on Flickr with this Licence. So Flickr made a mistake ? It was written it was verified. As I see it, this photo is anonymous and was shot before 1960. --Olivier Tanguy (talk) 08:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

It's known fact that people could make mistakes :-) What is important, it to find out country of origin and information about photographer, who owns copyrights. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I sent a message to Alan Light, the person who posted it on flickr. I hope he will give me satisfying answers. I'll tell you as soon as possible (and by the way, I'm french, so please excuse me if I make mistakes in writing). --Olivier Tanguy (talk) 21:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

I have an answer, sort of : The photo has been deleted from flickr. I imagine the uploader didn't know the date and the place exactly. I continue to think the photo has no copyright (taken before 1964 and the author anonymous) but I have unfortunatly no proof. Too bad. Thanks for your advice. Best regards, --Olivier Tanguy (talk) 20:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

3d illustration of coronavius.png

Dear Eugene, I draw this illustration using ink, paper and my hands. I wrote it in description of the file. What more may I do to fulfill wiki rules? Best Regards. Rayyar/Piotr Rayyar (talk) 21:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

I just wanted to clarify that no 3rd-party models were used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Sheree Renée Thomas

Hi, I am writing to ask why my photos keep being deleted from my wikipedia page. I am the author, editor discussed on the Sheree Renée Thomas (Sheree Thomas) page. I am the copyright owner of the photograph. I wasn't asked if I wanted the photo deleted. There was a previous one that had been up for two decades and that was suddenly. Again, why?

Sheree Renée Thomas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Journeyer8787 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request was open for two weeks, so you got enough time to address it. You could upload photo in original camera resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

About File:Assaba.jpg 

Hello, about this

it's a family photo of my great grandmother.

Regardes.--Waran18 (talk) 15:32, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

You need to find information about photographer or at least approximate date of creation if photographer is unknown. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country to find out if photo is in public domain or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok, done, it's picture of physical photo in frame.--Waran18 (talk) 15:37, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Please fix date of creation. Physical media doesn't matter. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I do not understand where it is the problem. I don't know Warant18 and I don't know his age, but if he was 25 when he started on Wikipedia in 2010 then his great-grandmother must have been born in the 1910s and it looks like the photo was taken in the '40s-'50s, and it was never publicly published. How can you fix the information about the author of a family photo taken 70 years ago? It's impossible. I myself have a family photo of an Algerian personality taken in the '90s, it has never been published and no one remembers who took it. How do I have to do? --Houmouvazine (talk) 18:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Photo obviously was created not in 2021. Anyway, it's responsibility of uploader to provide truthful source information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I understood, I corrected the date.--Waran18 (talk) 18:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Date is still 2021 as well as incorrect claim of own work and license. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

License is {{PD-Algeria-photo-except}}, date is 1960. I do not understand you at all, I am a former contributor, there are thousands of copyvio pictures, and you are keen on family photos never published elsewhere! --Waran18 (talk) 08:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

I removed {{Dw no source since}}. You could help with removing existing copyrights violations, but also help with not creating new ones. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Files to be deleted in User:Haroldomil

Good Morning, EugeneZelenko. I am glad for your attention on my contributions inside Wikipedia Commons.

I had read that there are some of my contributions in Wikipedia Commons listed for deletion:

In category of Copyright status:
• File:Estacion Ponce.jpg
• File:Estacion San Juan 2.jpg
• File:Estacion-San-Juan 1.jpg
• File:FerrocarrilHistoricoMap.jpg
• File:American Railroad Company 1910.png
• File:MH 1. Honvéd Tűzszerész És Hadihajós Ezred.png

In category of Derivative works from mascot:
• File:Eagle UAA.jpg

In category of Permission information:
• File:Mapa UAA.png
• File:CAAM.png

In category of Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF:
• File:Gimnasio UAA.jpg
• File:Entrada UAA.jpg
• File:Universidad-Adventista-Antillas Carrusel.jpg
• File:Fajadoturismo.jpg
• File:Fajardotourist.jpg
• File:Tren Arroyo 2.jpg
• File:Tren Arroyo 1.jpg

I am interested to fulfill the requirements for these files in Wikipedia Commons. I am a non-native English speaker and some of the instructions on Wikipedia Commons are difficult to understand for me. Let indicate me what is missing in these files to keep them in Commons. Please do not feel offended neither take as personal attack. Thanks for yor attention. Haroldomil (talk) 13:21, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Relevant rules and links were provided in messages on your talk page or deletion requests.

1st and 2rd groups of files - not your own work. May be in public domain, but proper source and license tag must be used. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country.

See Commons:Derivative works. Most likely mascot is copyrighted.

Maps are copyrighted and your authorship is unlikely.

Last group of files - you could upload photos in original camera resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Good afternoon, EugeneZelenko. Thanks for your attention and for answer me.

About the File:CAAM.png, I am in contact with the Chancellor of the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez for getting its written authorization about this derivative work. I hope recieve soon an answer.

About the files:

• File:Eagle UAA.jpg

• File:Mapa UAA.png

as official items from Adventist Antillean University, I am in contact with the President of that university counsulting about the matter. I am hoping a answer soon.

About these files:

• File:Estacion Ponce.jpg

• File:Estacion San Juan 2.jpg

• File:Estacion-San-Juan 1.jpg

• File:FerrocarrilHistoricoMap.jpg

• File:American Railroad Company 1910.png

I will provide the meta data about the origin of these works. Can they qualify by Public Domain because are older than 50 years from its initial creation? (The concept "own work" is about reproduction by me, not the origin of these files.) Any doubts, please ask me.

About the File:MH 1. Honvéd Tűzszerész És Hadihajós Ezred.png:

Asked Hungarian Ministry of Defense and the naval unit about the matter. Waiting answer.

About these files in category of Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF:

• File:Gimnasio UAA.jpg

• File:Entrada UAA.jpg

• File:Universidad-Adventista-Antillas Carrusel.jpg

• File:Fajadoturismo.jpg

• File:Fajardotourist.jpg

• File:Tren Arroyo 2.jpg

• File:Tren Arroyo 1.jpg

I had lost the original photos than contains the EXIF and original metadata. These are copies from copies from the original. What would do?

Any complaints or additional questions, EugeneZelenko? Thank you for helping me! Haroldomil (talk) 17:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Public domain status conditions depends on country. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

ShufaBot

Hello Eugene, i did my test run. Could you check Commons:Bots/Requests/ShufaBot and give me guidance for the next step. Yug (talk) 15:11, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

The current process, wordings, unanounced roadblocks are confusing for new applicants resulting is misdirections and missunderstandings. But thank for the guidance. Will find the way through. Yug (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Note

Hi, please I know what I am doing. My talkpage is my talkpage. Please do not edit it again to add what I removed. Okay.? – Ammarpad (talk) 04:57, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

No. Your user page contain history of all problems with observing rules of project. You must preserve it or face consequences. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:59, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Please and Please do not edit my talkpage again. You have already reported the non-issue, so respect that. – Ammarpad (talk) 05:13, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

DW

Hi EugeneZelenko, Could you undelete File:Fishy Mobile.jpg please and I'll send to DR - I personally don't believe this is a DW issue however if it is I can photoshop the offending material out. Many thanks, Regards ,–Davey2010^Talk 09:34, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

I don't think that this is single photo of particular van model on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Sorry I don't understand you - The van can be identified if it isn't already and the advertisement on the van can be blanked out. Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:19, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

My point is most likely if van model is well represented - there is no value in adding yet another photo of it and bother with photo-editing. Please also read Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

But I don't know if it is well represented because I don't know the vehicle make/model (because the cached image was blurry). Again the image is clearly in project scope - You have a problem with the advertisement so I've said I'll remove the offending material ..... so again could you undelete the file. Like I said I'll send it to DR if that's what you want but either way the image is clearly salvageable. Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 10:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Van was completely covered with logo, graphical advertisement and advertisement text. Later is also out of Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Okay are you able to send a picture of it without undeleting it as I'm not sure how much of the van is salvageable and obviously I don't want to have it undeleted if the file isn't as straight foward as I think, Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

No this photo is not salvageable. Just choose other existing van photo for your purposes. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Van is main subject of photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Looked at the cached version and the van is salvageable so I'll ask another admin to undelete it. The image depicts a van outside of a companies premises on a street so it's in scope - If the image consisted of a zoomed up version of the van than sure I would agree with your deletion but in this specific case as I said the image is salvagable. –Davey2010^Talk 14:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Apologies edited the original comment whilst you were replying. Sorry but the image is salvagable. Have a great day. –Davey2010^Talk 14:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand purpose to argue over photo of non-notable building and van with custom painting. Vehicles are very well covered on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Choorayi kanaran.jpg

Regarding this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Choorayi_kanaran.jpg

Hi this is the source file: I edited cropped that file and edited it.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/192676098@N07/51093413482/in/dateposted-public/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noncreativephotographer (talk • contribs) 16:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, you are not original author. However, this image may be in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

I'm not the author, I mentioned as Dheeraj (my friend, you can see the water mark in the above file, he is my firned and the flicker account belongs to him and he uploaded to it. i clearly mentioned his name.

i have provided the original work's source , then why again tagged as no original source found?

i croped the image using paint and made that image , original file is copy right free and provided the source when you tagged the image last time citing original source file need to be copyright free — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noncreativephotographer (talk • contribs) 16:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

I don't think that your friend is original author of photo too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

This is him : https://www.facebook.com/dheeraj.kml.0 you can ask, and this is his flicker handler where he uploaded his works copy right free. Then what is the problem ? Noncreativephotographer (talk)

Please read Commons:Derivative works to understand problem. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Soldier from the Finnish People's Army.jpg

Hi! I have now provided the proper copyright tag. I presume the issue should now be solved. I am a fairly new user, so bear with me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buttwart (talk • contribs) 22:37, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Are you sure that this photo was taken on Soviet side, not Soviet trophy? Sorry, I could not open book book. It may be reasonable to check Finnish Army archives that are very extensively digitized. If photo was taken in Soviet side, author in description should be marked as unknown (if not credited in book) . --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:53, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

The pictures in the book cannot be found on the Finnish Army archive using the dates, descriptions and locations given. Only the entity who ordered the picture is known, that being The Red Army. Here is the original legend: https://i.imgur.com/oMpt6SB.jpg --Buttwart (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

So please change author to {{Unknown}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Done. --Buttwart (talk) 21:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

I removed {{No license since}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:RICHTER_3.jpg

• Добрый день! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:RICHTER_3.jpg Можно ли тут восстановить фото, если автор умер (см. список умерших википедистов). Спасибо за ответ. 31.202.13.3 20:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

• У фотографа есть наследник(и), кто бы мог подтвердить авторство и загрузить в лучшем разрешении? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:07, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

  Я лично мало знал автора. Это Юрий Щербинин. Про него есть статья в руВП: Щербинин, Юрий Леонидович. Он в разговоре говорил следующее : что встречал Рихтера в Харькове, когда у него были гастроли; что был у него в номере гостиницы Харьков на пл. Дзержинского; провожал его на поезд 20 Х.-М., дождавшись отправления. Было это в 1966 году. Фотографировал он на ч-б плёнку. Три фото он загрузил в ВП лично (Рихтер1, Рихтер2 и Рихтер3). Это он говорил. Откуда взялся файл Щербинина №3 в малом разрешении (без авторства) в веб-архиве, не знаю. Ясно же (этого он не говорил, это мне ясно), что для портрета номер вагона 14 не нужен, он мешает. Наследников его не знаю. Возможно, их знает Участник:Григорий Ганзбург. Он может, возможно, не анонимно подтвердить его авторство удалённого фото. Спасибо !31.202.13.3 20:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

  В любом случае, авторские права сейчас принадлежат наследнику/це/ам. Подтверждение авторства лучше получить от них через Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

• А ПДН? Участник Ю. Щербинин добросовестен. В подлогах никем никогда ни разу не обвинялся. Он своё авторство фотографии подписал. Кроме того, в интернете можно легко найти на разных СМИ это фото с его авторством, то есть фото с 2007 года широко гуляет в сети - с авторством и без. Загрузил он этот файл во второй половине 2000-х годов. В пользу кого был удалён данный файл? Анонимного архива, без авторства, без подписи? А качество ВП от этого улучшиоась? Это никак не ПДН. А наследники.. Вот умер муж, отец. Оно вообще надо - авторство какой-то 55-летней фотографии, какое-то ОТРС, которое никому не понятно? С уважением,. 31.202.13.3 08:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

• Я с этим участником не сталкивался и не могу судить о его добросовестности. По поводу авторства и связанных проблем - читайте соответствующие законы России, Украины или любой другой страны на выбор. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Copyrights for Vril-Ya Bazaar images

Hi, Eugene. You left a note on my talk page about possible deletion of several images I posted related to the Vril-Ya Bazaar and Fete, held way back in 1891 at the Royal Albert Hall in London. Specifically, these are the images:

• File:Vril-Ya Bazaar programme pages from RAH.pdf
• File:Vril-Ya Bazaar programme - plan of hall.pdf
• File:Vril-ya bazaar program cover.jpg
• File:Vril-ya bazaar illustration.jpg

I'm asking you to remove the deletion notices of these files or tell me how I can do it. I find the upload system for Wikimedia Commons incredibly difficult to use, so I'd prefer that you do it.

Here's why these files are legally permitted on Wikimedia Commons: As I indicated when I uploaded the files, these are long since out of copyright because of their age. All of these are images of items published contemporaneously with the 1891 event. The last item on the bulleted list above is an illustration from an 1891 news article about the event. The other items are images of pages from the programme for the 1891 event published by the event organizers.

The Royal Albert Hall archives department has a physical copy of this old programme. I was able to download a digital copy of the cover (File:Vril-ya bazaar program cover.jpg) from the Royal Albert Hall website, but I wanted to see the entire programme, and so I wrote to the archives department requesting a copy. Here is their emailed response:

Many thanks for your enquiry regarding the 1891 ‘The Coming Race and Vril-Ya Bazaar and Fete’ at the Royal Albert Hall.

Please find below the information that the Hall holds about the event, and additionally please find attached a PDF of selected pages from the programme.

Unfortunately I am unable to send a full copy as the programme is awaiting conservation treatment and too fragile to currently be scanned in full.

Images may only be used for non-commercial purposes and must be captioned ‘Courtesy of Royal Albert Hall Archive. Ref. RAHE/1/1891/5’.

[listing of performers and other information about the event omitted here for brevity.]

The file File:Vril-Ya Bazaar programme pages from RAH.pdf was attached to this email. File:Vril-Ya Bazaar programme - plan of hall.pdf is a single page of the programme that I extracted from the larger file.

In short, all of the images are copyright free because they are all 130 years old. You didn't actually say this in your comment on my talk page, but your edit note indicates your question was why US copyright law was invoked when the works were published in the UK. It's because I didn't see an option in the upload wizard to cite UK law instead, but it is clear from List of Countries' Copyright Lengths that any UK copyright has likewise expired.

The only oddity is that given the courtesy of the staff of the Royal Albert Hall in making the pages from the event programme available, I attempted to oblige their request that the Royal Albert Hall be given a credit for providing the file. I'd be happy for your advice if there's a better way to handle it.

(The only other way I could think of was to ask the staff of the Royal Albert Hall to upload these copyright-free images to Wikimedia Commons themselves and assign a Creative Commons license to them. That is a sub-optimal solution for at least two reasons. First, the Royal Albert Hall themselves doesn't own the copyright to the programme, and thus they can't legally assert ownership in a Creative Commons license. Second, it would be rude to ask the Royal Albert Hall archives staff to undertake the extra effort. They've already been more than generous with their time simply getting us these images.)

--JohnPomeranz (talk) 03:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

These images are originated from UK, but US-related license tag was used. You need to fix this mistake. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Fixed on all of these files. Special thanks to JuTa who was kind enough to put the required public domain notice on two of these files (as it was obvious that their age put the images in the public domain) and thus to show me what I needed to do to comply with Wikimedia requirements. While I understand the need to comply with copyright law and applaud the diligent efforts to protect the rights of creators, the complexity of compliance is a huge barrier to participation for casual users of Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons like me. --JohnPomeranz (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Deletion

Can i known the behind deletion Rawalrajendranath (talk) 10:33, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Licensing carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Renaming files

For the files that you removed the delete request from, could you also perform the rename request that was removed because of the delete requests. Languageseeker (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

What new names should be? You could use {{Rename}} to specify that. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Surviving Family movie poster does not violate copyright

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surviving_Family

The new poster for the movie Surviving Family does not violate copyright. It is on the movie's IMDb page and is available for general use.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1991191/reference

I am the producer of the movie and own ALL of the rights to the movie, include the rights to the poster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlesemann (talk • contribs) 04:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I own all of the rights to the images in the movie, including those in the new poster. I hired the company that designed the new poster, and own all rights to it as well.

Therefore, please remove your deletion of the image file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlesemann (talk • contribs) 04:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Mara Lesemann

Please send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review and file undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination image

Hey, File:Shree Santhinath ji Maharaj Mausoleum (samadhi).jpg was clicked by mine and its my own click. Rawalrajendranath (talk) 06:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Please make comments on deletion request page. Please also disclose where other photos were taken. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Blue's Clues & You!.png/Dianardian36

Hi. I don't use Wikimedia Commons much (I'm mainly over on the English Wikipedia), but thought I'd let you know that this image is definitely a copyright violation. Not sure exactly how it's supposed to be handled, but I removed the fields/information from the image, as it is very clearly not their own image. Also worth noting that this user is blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia since last month. Magitroopa (talk) 17:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Also worth noting that they've tried uploading the logo multiple times, see here. Their abuse filter log should also be looked into... Magitroopa (talk) 17:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for help! I deleted file. You could use {{Copyvio}} in future for such purposes. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Proč navrhujete na smazání díla autorů kteří jsou 70 let po smrti? A proč fotku Františka Pospíšila, kterou jako i všechny fotky ang. parašutistů ang. vláda uvolnila? (This work created by the United Kingdom Government is in the public domain.) 212.4.138.139 18:28, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Could you please point to specific file or log in and sign? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:28, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

On the Deletion request

Hello EugeneZelenko, Thank you for your notice on the possible Google Earth copyright violation here. I wasn't aware of the derivative works guideline, yet. What are the next steps? do I need to do do something or the deletion procedure will be led by others? --CalliandraDysantha (talk) 18:37, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

If you know how to edit videos, you could cut Google Earth part and re-upload files. Some for other possible copyrighted parts. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:27, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

!

Why did you delete "File:DIMES portakal suyu.jpg"? It was my own work. [[User:Robingunes|<span style="text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #ff0000;font-size:105%;color:Red">'''Robin'''</span><span style="text-shadow: 1px 1px 2px #ff0000;font-size:105%;color:Orange">'''gunes'''</span>;]] (talk) 06:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Derivative works. By the word, this page was mentioned in message related to this file on your user page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Escritor Antonio Antolini

Hello, I cleaned up a lot files in the category:Antonio Antolini uploaded by new User:Escritor Antonio Antolini. It is quite self-publicity, and I am not sure about the copyrights. Could you give these a closer look. Kind greetings --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:33, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

It's hard for me to judge about notability, but it's doubtful that writer himself recorded all these videos. Likely some promotional entity did so. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Im sorry

Hi, im sorry i didn't know the photo was copyrighted, im so stupid at copy righting — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikismarty12359 (talk • contribs) 15:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Licensing carefully as well as copyrights law of your country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Redshift

I've create the textures for Rocinante planet of Cervantes to Celestia and shape of milky way, even Planck Background is free licence by NASA/ESO. Celestia is free software program. --Piquito veloz (talk) 18:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Even Eridanus supervoid is image of NASA/ESO Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech and Planck U.S. Data Center at IPAC --Piquito veloz (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

See here, can use for educational purposes. For example during years the users have seen this pic without any kind of problem generated by Celestia --Piquito veloz (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Shape of File:Milky way in Celestia.jpg is my work too. Robert Hurt's/ESO/NASA concept is free too. Even i've posted my creation here Piquito veloz (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

So all these images are not your own work. Please specify source and license for each of them. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Done (all sources edited), but mean you have a hard work here because lot of users making same. Most of NASA/ESO publications are free for educational purposes. For example you can see it here --Piquito veloz (talk) 01:11, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

I've added template for GNU screenshots because Celestia is GNU too, example here --Piquito veloz (talk) 01:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Celestia is not primary source of astronomical photos. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

GustavoDortmund

Olá, EugeneZelenko! Não seria o caso de bloqueio da conta GustavoDortmund (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user? Saudações, --Luan (talk) 14:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( I left final warnings on user's talk page. Through he uploaded a lot of problematic files, this was done in two batches, so I usually block on third occasion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Não entendi a referência à língua espanhola. A conta tem consertado o licenciamento de algumas imagens e em outras continua inserindo marcações sem sentido ou forçosas a formas geométricas simples, inserindo "Own work" e licenças duplas da CC, com isso, muitas vezes, removendo as indicações de eliminação por violação de direitos autorais (VDA). Em nenhum momento, respondeu aos vários avisos sobre os problemas de direitos autorais, não pedindo esclarecimentos ou ajuda; no lugar, removeu boa parte dos avisos da sua página de discussão de usuário (PDU). Irei enviar nova mensagem à referida conta. Saudações, --Luan (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Unifacisa.svg seems {{PD-textlogo}} for me, incorrect licenses could be removed from there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Sonaca logo.png

Hi. Would you please explain, why you delete the file? Thanks --Frank Murmann (talk) 15:31, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

For same reason as File:Logo aerodromedenamur.png - it's non-trivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

The logo consists of text and a simple geometric form. How much more trivial can a logo be? Frank Murmann (talk) 17:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Part of logo consist of gradients, so this makes it non-trivial. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:39, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Solvay

Bonjour Eugène,

J'ai reçu un accès sur le site de branding de Solvay afin d'updater leurs logos. Comment puis-je ajouter ces éléments sur Wikimedia ? Merci — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cipo jc (talk • contribs) 08:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know French :-( You could upload such images into projects that allow non-free media, for example, to English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello! about C$ green logo

About being not an svg i thank for the support, but about unusing, its because that script isnt that big already, its in work, when it will be released i will add it on wiki. thx for attention — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImJC1 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Problema con la foto

Ciao, ho visto che hai eliminato la foto dei cd di Sushy in Giappone, ma la foto l'ho fatta io nel 2016 e avevo messo al momento del caricamento che ero io l'autore, c'è un modo per reinserirla ? Grazie mille--EL SARO 92 (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Italian :-( Please read Commons:Derivative works that was mentioned in notice on your user page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Amigo, creo que te equivocas.

Hola amigo, hace meses me eliminaron toda mi galería de imágenes de Wikidata. ¿Por qué lo hacen? Aquella vez, subí imágenes oficiales de álbumes de artistas, esta vez, he tomado imágenes inéditas de los artículos que estoy trabajando, me parece de muy mal gusto que las eliminen sin ni siquiera conseguirlas en otros medios, no hay derechos de autor. Por favor, te pido que las restaures, no hay ninguna infracción de copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk • contribs) 16:14, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Please ask copyright owner(s) to send authorship confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Than you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

A query

Can I use pics from an online newspaper like these? :

https://www.mathrubhumi.com/spirituality/specials/sabarimala-2019/features/cheerappanchira-moolasthanam-malikappuram-1.4337851

Also can i use pics from facebook? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noncreativephotographer (talk • contribs) 09:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

No, unless license is explicitly spelled and comparable with Commons:Licensing. By the word, first site is clearly contain © Copyright Mathrubhumi 2021. All rights reserved in boilerplate. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Question from POitor

Hello EugeneZelenko, You have submitted some of my files for deletion because they are not the pictures I drew, so I have listed the sources from which I took the files. But even after citing sources, my files are submitted for deletion, please tell me why? --POitor (talk) 21:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)POitor_ARM

Since you had many problematic files, which group do you mean in this discussion? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

For example- File:Իշխանություն ֆիլմ.jpg, File:Հարսանիք թիկունքում(fillm poster).jpg, File:ԳագիկԾառուկյան.jpg, File:TumoGyumriIMG.jpg and others --(UTC)POitor_ARM — Preceding unsigned comment added by POitor (talk • contribs) 21:42, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

First two files are movie posters. Next two are just taken from Internet. Please read Commons:Licensing and copyrights law of Armenia carefully before making new uploads. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:47, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

And why the movie posters were deleted, but I mentioned the sources? --POitor (talk) 02:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)POitor_ARM

Availability of something on Internet doesn't assume license compatible with Commons:Licensing. Please read texts mentioned above. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Multiple logos deleted

I have noticed you have deleted a bunch of logos that I have uploaded onto Wikimedia, flagging them as "c:Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo", and I want to talk to you to have this issue resolved. I am fairly new at uploading stuff on here and editing on Wikipedia, so if there is something wrong with the way I uploaded those logos, I would like to know and I want to see if there is a way I can have those deleted logos re-instated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hilldoug750057 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Most likely non-trivial logos copyrighted unless they are in public domain by reason. See Commons:Licensing. However you could upload non-free media locally to projects that allow it, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:11, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:The Pharmacist.webm

Hi, Thank you for the heads-up. I created the video myself for the Wiki Loves Africa Competition 2021 with the theme "Health and Wellness". I thought the source had been indicated once I agreed as the license holder before upload. The video is originally my production so I do not see the "derivative work" tag being referred to. I'm new to wikimedia commons upload and this is my first video upload. Any help here is much appreciated. KwesiRaul (talk) 20:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

What is source and license for music used in video? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:09, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you for the prompt response. The background music source is

"Background Music for Videos: https://www.bluetreeaudio.com". I've added that to the description. Hope that is the right way to do it. Your feedback is very much appreciated. KwesiRaul (talk) 02:10, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Please read https://www.bluetreeaudio.com/license carefully. There are limitations incompatible wit Commons:Licensing. You need to remove music to keep video. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I've read the information and I realise the licensing issues. Thank you for the links. Rather than just removing the background music if possible I would want to change the music with music that is licensed under Creative commons. However, I can't figure out how to do this. Any help on that please? -- KwesiRaul (talk) 15:02, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Do you still have original (unaltered) video? Obviously, it'll be much easier to add other sound track on it. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Yes please it's quite easy to do that. I'm sorry for the not too clear question. I was referring to how to change the video on commons to the one with the new music.-- KwesiRaul (talk) 23:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

You need to reupload new version of file, change description to include information about source/license of music and then request deletion of old version. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:23, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I worked at reuploading the new version of the file but I think I've created a new file rather. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Pharmacist-1.webm. So do I leave the first one to be deleted? Also can you kindly confirm that there are no issues with the music this time round? And finally I guess the video can no longer be a part of the Wiki Loves Africa 2021 competition, right? Thanks a lot for the feedback. I'm available to make any changes to the new one if necessary. Awaiting your feedback. KwesiRaul (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

License and text on YouTube are contradictory: CC-BY vs My music is COPYRIGHTED however free to use on social media AS LONG AS credit/attribution is given.; If you wish to use my music for commercial purposes (online advertisements, sponsored advertisements, podcasts etc), you will need to purchase a license. (bold highlighting of incompatibilities with Commons:Licensing is mine). Looks like uploader didn't read CC-BY text or don't know about CC-BY-NC. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok. So can we use the background music then? Also is it ok to leave the first one to be deleted? KwesiRaul (talk) 21:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

I don't think so. But is background music really necessary? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Files from João Silva Wiki

Hi! Hope you are doing well. All the files you you putted on "Deletion requests/Files uploaded by João Silva Wiki" are either my work, or work that I was autorizhed to upload. Those are my own work: File:Prêmio Araucária de Cinema.jpg File:Alexguns.jpg File:MontereyBayAquariumSilhuette.jpg File:Trofeuredentor.jpg File:Trofeuvitoria.jpg File:Trofeucurtacinema.jpg File:Cinepe2018.jpg File:Thomyorkeriodejaneiro.jpg File:Festivaldoriocerimonia2018.jpg

And for the rest, I have autorization. How can I proceed? All best João Silva Wiki (talk) 16:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Please ask copyrights owner(s) to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:46, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. But about the ones that are my own work? You'll see that you cant find them anywhere else online. Thanks! João Silva Wiki (talk) 14:40, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Please clearly separate own for 3rd party works on deletion request page, so it'll be easier to judge how plausible such claims are. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

template editor for User:VRTS Migration Bot

Dear EugeneZelenko. The bot also has to edit a lot of protected templates, like e.g. Template:PD-Faroe stamps. Can you assign template editor rights temporary for one month? I think this should be mostly done after that time, the rest then likely can be done manually. Thank you! --Krd 11:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

@Krd:  Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! --Krd 15:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

ចិត្រា95

You recently removed a number of images uploaded by ចិត្រា95 (talk · contribs). They've since re-uploaded them, and removed the logo tag when I nominated them for speedy deletion. Could you please remove them again? Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for help! I deleted files and added final warning. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 03:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Logo ?

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , I found that Damak9 had uploaded the logo of Bhairawaha Gladiators .Please check that it is applicable or not.Best Regards !(Fade258 (talk) 14:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC))

Thank you for help! Deleted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: , Can you make the tutorial video for uploading the photo? (Fade258 (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2021 (UTC))

Sorry, making videos is Terra Incognito for me :-( I'm also old-fashioned and still use basic upload form - it may not too relevant for new users :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Again I will ask you something. Why the logo of Lalitpur Patriots wasn't delete ? Please kindly response me .(Fade258 (talk) 14:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC))

Could you please provide link to file? You could also use {{Copyvio}}, so other administrator would be aware about problematic file. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

This is the link Lalitpur Patriots (Fade258 (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC))

Some WMF projects, like English Wikipedia, allow non-free media uploaded locally. See w:en:File:Lalitpur Patriots.png. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok ! Last question . If I download the picture from internet and cropped that particular picture which is download and upload it to Wikipedia commons by selecting the licence tag of self|cc-by-sa-4.0 and mentioning the author as Own Work and at the source as link of picture which was download/extracted .Is it ok or not . Please tell me .Best Regards!(Fade258 (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC))

No. At first license of original picture must be compatible with Commons:Licensing. You could not claim derivative work as own, but further details depend on original license. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you So much for spending your valuable time with me. I will contact you again when I need .(Fade258 (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC))

Hi It's me again . Again I had uploaded the logo for Bhairawaha Gladiators . Please check that whether it is correct or not or On that file where i made a mistake please tell me . Thank you ! (Fade258 (talk) 06:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC))

You uploaded it to wrong place again. License is also wrong. As I wrote already this logo must be uploaded locally to English Wikipedia (in you case) as non-free media. See w:en:File:Lalitpur Patriots.png as example. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

I had tried many times to upload but not happening.Those image which i try to Upload is found in internet and it is liscenced under '©All Rights Reserved .So, how can I upload it to wikipedia .Please tell me with liscenced and method beacuse I am new on wikipedia.(Fade258 (talk) 14:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC))

Did you read text on w:en:Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard? If this didn't happen of you didn't notice Upload a non-free file button with Uploads locally to Wikipedia; must comply with the non-free content criteria clarification, here is direct link for local uploads. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I had uploaded the image by this method.I do thisfirst I put the image and proceed to next after that I entered to liscence selecting part and then selected cc-by-sa-3.0but every time I had changed the liscence it is always deleted.Why ?(Fade258 (talk) 14:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC))

Did you comprehend that file may be uploaded to Commons or locally to English Wikipedia? Non-free media could be uploaded only to later. cc-by-sa-3.0 is wrong claim. Again, please read all text on w:en:File:Lalitpur Patriots.png as well as Commons:Licensing. Sorry, if all this is too complicated for you, please follow direct link above and don't forget to use proper non-free media template. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

OgreBot

Today I saw your post on Magog the Ogre's talk page. Around this time last year, when Magog had some problems he stopped his bot completely. At that time I was in direct contact with him and he told me "The source code is at: https://bitbucket.org/MagogTheOgre/ogrebot/src/master/. If you download it and spend some time, you should be able to figure things out. You'll need to set up a properties file with passwords and create a few directories." I encouraged him to restart the bot which he kindly did after a short time. I don't know what the current issue is but the link above appears to be fine, so maybe you know someone who would take it on. According to the bit talk page some major database update have been made that require some significant changes to the bot. I don't know anyone like that. Let me know if I can assist in any other way because it is a shame to lose this great service. Ww2censor (talk) 16:38, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

I think request on Commons:Bots/Work requests could be best way to find new owner. I'll place it there tomorrow. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bandar Al-Ahbabi.png & Al Ain team in 2018.png

Hey, I personally contact the photographer and the owner of these images on his twitter account I also have the conversation to confirm that, he only ask me to credit him!! Sm3a (talk) 23:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Please ask photographer to send authorship confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Copyright issue with uploaded photo of Franz Josef Wagner

Dear EugeneZelenko, please see my comment on User talk:Konrad15 and, if you agree with me, stop the deletion of the photo. --Konrad15 (talk) 22:08, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Удалите пожалуйста файл

Здравствуйте! Загрузил файл, но там в описании источника, есть на мой взгляд всё же некоторая неопределённость... Поэтому думаю, лучше будет, если его таки удалить. --Iskatelb (talk) 00:14, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Спасибо! --Iskatelb (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Replacing an image

I noticed an image that is in Wiki commons that is a mirror image of the correct image. Even though I have editing privileges I am not able to upload a new version (it's t he same, just not a mirror image). Is that something you can help me with? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vorteilhaft (talk • contribs) 00:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

File:ߡߊ߲߬ߘߋ߲߬ ߓߟߏߦߊߛߏ.png

Hi, this page was created by myself, maybe I forgot the copyright tags. So can I edit it? Thanks

Lancine.koufantoh.fofana (talk) 07:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Looks like it use other elements like logo. Please read Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC)