User talk:Dragovit

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dragovit!
Pay attention to copyright
File:Logo DSSS.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Harold (talk) 23:17, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Old Republic emblem.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Old Republic emblem.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Apocheir (talk) 19:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Q_douglasii_and_Dragovit. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Tom-L (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. – Dragovit 21:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coats of arms deletion requests[edit]

Hello, although I generally agree with your assessment of those symbols, my experience over the years has been that being inaccurate or based on uploader's own liberal interpretation of historical coat of arms is not a grounds for deletion unless they were uploaded with malicious intent (hoax, trolling, vandalism). Alternate history, user-made micronation symbols etc. have been kept as in-scope multiple times when I nominated them around 2 years ago when cleaning out Flags main category. Because of that, I would advise you to dispute the accuracy with Template:Disputed coat of arms or Template:Fictional and making sure that they aren't used on projects where you are active rather than nominating all for deletion.--TFerenczy (talk) 12:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Okay, I agree more or less, but the author all templates denoting his files as fictional instantly erases, so what to do with it? --Dragovit (talk) 13:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020![edit]

Czech Wiki Photo
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added what I beelieve is your source as an hyperlink in the description. Is it the right source? If it is, it seems strange to me that those Bs be going up, as according to this source they should be going down. Veverve (talk) 02:24, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I cannot find any image of the portolan chart of Gabriel de Vallseca of 1439 whose resolution would be high enough to see what the Byzantine flag looks like. Since you said you used it to make File:Byzantine imperial flag, 14th century according to portolan charts.png, could you give your source and possibly upload it on Commons? It would help me in my research at Category talk:Flags of the Palaiologos dynasty. Veverve (talk) 03:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I allow myself to ask again. I have added what I beelieve is your source as an hyperlink in the description. Is it the right source? If it is, it seems strange to me that those Bs be going up, as according to this source they should be going down. I cannot find any image of the portolan chart of Gabriel de Vallseca of 1439 whose resolution would be high enough to see what the Byzantine flag looks like. Since you said you used it to make File:Byzantine imperial flag, 14th century according to portolan charts.png, could you give your source and possibly upload it on Commons? Veverve (talk) 03:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not easy to answer. I created the flag based on the Pietro Vesconte's map and also accordint to the website hubert-herald.nl/ByzantiumArms where is the different picture of the Veconte's map and also their own rendition of the flag. When I compare these sources, it seems to me that Bs be going up and I consider my version to be correct. As for the map of Gabriel de Vallseca's map, i also saw the same image in low resolution, but it seems to me that the flag there is identical or similar. The only difference is that the flag is square with tiny tails and the Bs are elongated, but they are laid identically. Of course, I didn't made the flag on the basis of this map, but I added it to the description as a additionaly source to support the other two sources. The flag is based on a combination of three sources. – Dragovit 09:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for answering.
1) I believed your Bs did not point toward the correct direction. However, now I understand you used a different source, and not the one I had indicated in your description. I will fix it right now.
2) Could you add Gabriel de Vallseca's map you used in your description? Veverve (talk) 17:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While I am a it, could you give the source you used to make File:Byzantine Divellion Standard.png? Veverve (talk) 13:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Byzantine Divellion Standard.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Byzantine Divellion Standard.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Veverve (talk) 10:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Byzantine-Ottoman Wars-1-withborders.PNG[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Byzantine-Ottoman Wars-1-withborders.PNG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Veverve (talk) 10:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kantakouzinos-Arms.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Veverve (talk) 21:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Austria-Hungary[edit]

Hey, I noticed your move request at File:Flag of Austria-Hungary (1869-1918).svg which you've requested be moved to File:Civil ensign of Austria-Hungary (1869–1918).svg. Notice that there is also File:Civil ensign of Austria-Hungary (1869-1918).svg which is different but named exactly the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonnym (talk • contribs) 08:43, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There are no different. It's not true, because both are just representations of one flag and therefore I demand the same (similar) name. The idea that this flag is different from the first is wrong, it's just a different design, but the same flag. Thanks for your message. Dragovit (talk) 08:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Byzantion-Banner.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Constantine 07:55, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This file was not uploaded by me and I do not want to comment on it. Thanks. Dragovit (talk) 11:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of the House of Toulouse-Tripoli[edit]

Hi, I saw that you created File:Coat of arms of the House of Toulouse-Tripoli.png and was wondering whether it was an actual CoA, and if so what is the source, or if it was attributed or fictional? --Red Phoenician (talk) 04:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. To create this CoA I was inspired by those site Wappenwiki.org/House of Toulouse (please use link) and there is. I'm not sure what it's based on, but there are only historical coats of arms and all heraldry on this site is accurate. Dragovit (talk) 11:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thank you for the clarification. Red Phoenician (talk) 00:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not disrupt Wikimedia Commons to illustrate a point[edit]

Hi,

Please stop immediately to disrupt Wikimedia Commons to illustrate a point. I refer to your...stuff related to the domain public Czech lion image reusage.

Take this as a final warning, please. --Benoît (d) 08:39, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Why are you writing me this warning? We only discuss to reach a consensus and that's exactly what happened, right now. I had a discussion with the author of the files. Since when is discussion considered disruptive? Please do not obstruct communication between users. It is absolutely not as you describe it, we are looking for the best solution for all.
EDIT: As for the warning I added to the file, that's a common template with a message. I also don't know what's disruptive about it and why it can't be there. It's just a red box with text which is commonly used. The users should be informed about the file before using it. The purpose of this is educational, not to disturb something. Dragovit (talk) 08:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]