User talk:BeatrixBelibaste

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

DjVu[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai vu que tu était entrain de copier un libre entier sur Commons. Connais-tu le format de fichier fr:DjVu ? C'est un peut comme des PDF mais supporté par MediaWiki. Pour exemple Image:Mozart Sonate (manuscript).djvu ou Image:Concessions in USSR 1928.djvu. Ca permet de ne copier ou de ne télécharger qu'un seul fichier de plusieurs pages, et de faciliter la consultation. J'imagine qu'il existe des outils libres pour regrouper un ensemble d'image dans un fichier DjVu. C'était juste pour l'information. Bonne continuation. ~ bayo or talk 02:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Merci pour l'info. J'ai déjà entendu parler du format et je sais qu'il existe quelque part en version libre, même si je ne suis pas du tout familière avec son usage. C'est vrai que le format serait plus pratique pour la consultation. Par contre, les fichiers que je mets en ligne sont destinés à un projet spécifique pour Wikisource, en mode affichage page par page, pour lequel les images doivent être disponibles directement sous JPEG. Amicalement, --BeatrixBelibaste 03:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
En fait c'est possible, il faut juste préciser le numéroo de la page à afficher.

Mais j'admets que l'intégration dans MediaWiki n'est pas encore bien au point (cliquer sur l'image ne conduit pas à la bonne page). Cela viendra peut être plus tard. ~ bayo or talk 02:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 2de17504499d7f08452f0e8d40a567f1[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Image deletion warning Image:Miniature_Inukshuks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

abf /talk to me/ 13:22, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

file without categories[edit]

Hello, your nice file File:Apollodore de Damas - Poliorcétiques 11.png from 2007 has no categories?! - can you add a description and Cats? Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 10:56, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, last year you created this subcategory. Could it be a better idea to make this a subcategory to Category:Sculptures of women or category:Etchings of women? I don't really know what medieval miniatures are. Maybe you can somebody look into this? --Vera (talk) 12:34, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 05:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


✓ Done --BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear BeatrixBelibaste,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BeatrixBelibaste, I still disagree that the whole category should be put into the Category:Swans in art by topic, because then, this image couldn't be in the category, even though it should. As much as this category which is a necessary sub-category of Category:Schwanenorden. Perhaps it is necessary to make a new category Category:Schwanenorden in heraldry. Let's see if we can solve this together. --Wuselig (talk) 02:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camel milk at store.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cake7545 (talk) 21:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shubat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🎂CAKE🎂 09:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your picture of Alfonso Jordan! R.Chao (talk) 06:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Papineau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear BeatrixBelibaste,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Saisie du Canadien 1810.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 11:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation of bird's picture[edit]

Why did you reverse my modification? The name of the category is : "Sculptures of birds by country", so it has to contain only categories with a country's name. --Moon rabbit 365 (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Moon rabbit 365: I was just writing to you on your discussion page about that :-). I would like to know why you have removed all subcategories for bird species and mediums from Birds in art by country? Sculpture is a type of art, like swan is a type of birds. Why "Sculptures of birds by country" should not be categorized in Birds in art by country??? It helps a lot for the sub-categorization of documents and organization of meta-categories. BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 13:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Émeutes de 1918 - Monument - 17 mars 2018.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:LBMM-2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jdapenao (talk) 03:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Les Contenances de la table1.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Les Contenances de la table1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:58, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: , It was an old, forgotten image uploaded 12 years ago. The informations was there, but without a template. I added and completed the template:Information, corrected the source and added all the PDs tags. BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 14:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear BeatrixBelibaste,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Human skeletons in art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


BMacZero (talk) 16:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear BeatrixBelibaste,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pope John Paul II holding a koala and meeting with media, Brisbane, 25 November 1986 (36318174586) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ca va bien aller[edit]

Wilfredor (talk) 17:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Musée national des beaux-arts du Québec[edit]

Dear Beatrix,

Some time ago I took some pictures of paintings in the Musée de la civilisation/beaux-arts, however, I would like to add some in a Wikipedia article, unfortunately my knowledge of Quebec history is limited. Please, if by chance you see that one could be useful, let me know. Thanks

Cheers --Wilfredor (talk) 00:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Wilfredor: I already added File:Olympe and Flore Chauveau by Theophile Hamel, 1851-1852.jpg on fr:Pierre-Joseph-Olivier Chauveau (the father of the girls) and fr:Théophile Hamel (the painter). I'll have a look at the others in few days. --BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 15:19, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Walters Art Museum[edit]

Bonjour BeatrixBelibaste, Pour des images du Walters Art Museum, il semble que le modèle "Walters Art Museum license" était spécifique aux images versées en 2012 dans le cadre du projet de coopération. Depuis 2015, les images sur le site du Walters Art Museum, qui étaient auparavant CC by-sa 3.0, sont maintenant passées à CC0 [1]. Il semble donc que les images versées sur Commons maintenant, par exemple celle-ci, devraient l'être avec CC0. -- Asclepias (talk) 12:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Allô Asclepias, Merci pour l'avis, j'ai corrigé la série. J'avais copié-collé le modèle et la licence des images du même objet téléversées en 2012... c'était visiblement une mauvaise idée... Cordialement, --BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 15:55, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marguerite de Bourbon[edit]

Bonjour, BeatrixBelibaste.

Vous avez bien fait d'annuler ma modif' relative au portrait de Marguerite de Bourbon.

En effet, même si Gallica n'attribue pas systématiquement à Louis Boudan la réalisation des œuvres de la collection de Roger de Gaignières, j'ai déjà repéré par ailleurs des erreurs ou des imprécisions dans les fiches de ce site.

Du reste, il nous faudrait idéalement tenter de lever ces ambiguïtés en renseignant la ligne "référence" dans les pages Wikimedia Commons grâce au catalogue établi par Clotilde Romet (mais je ne dispose malheureusement pas de cet ouvrage), voire l'étude plus générale d'Anne Ritz-Guilbert. Un énorme boulot en perspective...  :-)

Bien cordialement. --Guise (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pour les images provenant de la collection Gaignières, j'utilise souvent pour la description le projet Collecta, qui tente de reconstituer virtuellement la collection, en croisant avec d'autres sources. BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 13:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Deers in crest has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 03:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BeatrixBelibaste: since you where the uploader, maybe you know if this is an artist's depiction of Louis the Child and his mother Ota. Would be nice if it could be added to the article of Ota. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Lotje: , unfortunately, all the information I have regarding the painting is already there, taken from the source. The artist did not necessarily depict a particular child king. Sorry, --BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 14:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad, but thanks for the information. Lotje (talk) 14:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johann Franz Anton von Zedtwitz (1713-1784).jpg[edit]

Bonjour, je suis le propriétaire de la peinture originale.Veuillez retirer l'image du domaine public immédiatement pour éviter les problèmes juridiques.Merci beaucoup! Geische (talk) 17:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, félicitations pour l'acquisition de cet intéressant tableau. L'oeuvre date des années 1770 et elle est donc tombée dans le domaine public. Le droit d'auteur appartient au peintre qui a réalisé l'oeuvre, puis à ses héritiers jusqu'à l'expiration de ses droits. Elle n'appartient pas au propriétaire de l'oeuvre. En Autriche d'où provient l'oeuvre, la durée du droit d'auteur est la durée de la vie de l'auteur + 70 ans, ou 70 ans après la création de l'oeuvre pour une oeuvre anonyme. Pour l'acceptation de photographies d'oeuvres d'art en deux dimensions tombées dans le domaine public sur Commons, voir Commons:Quand utiliser le bandeau PD-Art. BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, pour le tableau lui-même, la fin du droit d'auteur est correcte. Cependant, le photographe de Thierry de Maigret détient les droits d'auteur de la photo que vous utilisez. Avez-vous un lien avec la maison de vente aux enchères? Mais vous pouvez utiliser une photo de moi. Ensuite, il n'y a pas de problèmes. Veuillez ensuite indiquer (moi) le propriétaire de l'image dans la licence et définir l'image sur protégée. Pas de licence gratuite. Je changerai tout l'article de Zedtwitz sous peu. J'ai fait des recherches sur sa vie pendant 20 ans et je publierai un livre bientôt. Une grande partie des informations sur l'article est incorrecte ou inexacte. S'il vous plaît ne vous méprenez pas. Je ne veux pas causer de problèmes et coopérer avec eux. Meilleurs vœux, Geische Geische (talk) 19:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johann Franz Anton von Zedtwitz (1713-1784).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Geische (talk) 10:29, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]