User talk:Austriacus
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
-- 14:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:ZORN på sandhamn.jpg[edit]
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ZORN på sandhamn.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
-mattbuck (Talk) 21:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrol given[edit]
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 07:14, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Austriacus, wieso Doge?? http://www.googleartproject.com/de/collection/kunsthistorisches-museum-vienna-museum-of-fine-arts/artwork/lorenzo-soranzo-jacopo-robusti-called-tintoretto/27366662/details/ Ist auch nicht http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doge_von_Venedig. Grüße--Oursana (talk) 17:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Wahrscheinlich ein Fall von Betriebsblindheit, vielen Dank für's Korrigieren.—Austriacus (talk) 12:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
In the latest upload her dress color changes from blue to lilac... AnonMoos (talk) 07:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Without access to the original, it's near impossible to tell which version is more correct. I do think the lilac one is, however. Just look at the sidewalk: It looks more natural than in the "blue" reproductions.—Austriacus (talk) 19:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- OK. I don't know which one is correct either, it just seemed a significant change... AnonMoos (talk) 19:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Source[edit]
Hello,
Could you please provide a source for File:Eugene de Blaas On the Beach.jpg? Thanks!
(Note that I splitted the upload to keep the older file at File:Eugene de Blaas On the Beach - Art Renewal Center.jpg)
Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 12:57, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- What's the point of that? The old file remains accessible in the history anyway. We've got far too many parallel reproductions of paintings already.—Austriacus (talk) 13:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Vittore Carpaccio - The Virgin Reading.jpg[edit]
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Vittore Carpaccio - The Virgin Reading.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- I do not quite understand the problem. The license is "PD-Art|PD-old-auto-1923|deathyear=1525". It is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain because the painter died in 1525. The reproduction is probably a hi-res scan from a book (I don't know), I found it on flickr, the link is in the template under "source". That's all I can say.—Austriacus (talk) 00:03, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright Status of the Return of the Prodigal Son by Pompeo Batoni[edit]
Dear Austriacus
please can you clarify the copyright status of this image? are you the owner?
Many thanks
The Return of the Prodigal Son by Pompeo Batoni- are you the photographer?[edit]
Dear Austriacus
please let me know if you are the photographer of the image and if so, if I can use this image?
Your swift response is highly appreciated
Many thanks
- I suppose you are referring to this image? No, I'm not the photographer, it's from Gallerix. The painting itself is in the public domain due to age. Whether or not you can use it depends on how copyright law in the area you live in treats photographs of PD art, see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for an introduction.—Austriacus (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Austriacus for your reply. Unfortunately I live in a country where copyright applies to
photographs. However, if the photographer gives me permission then that will be ok. I am
trying to contact the previous entry Gryffnor in the hope that I can use that one.
Do you know how to contact the photographer at Gallerix? Their site is all in Russian. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
- Under en.gallerix.ru, the site is partly translated, but I could find no copyright notice, and no contact info either. You could try contacting the Kunsthistorisches Museum (info@khm.at), maybe they can help you.—Austriacus (talk) 03:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Austriacus
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Austriacus⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
|
File:Composer-Henry-Purcell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Shakko (talk) 09:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]
Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Austriacus,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Reggianini[edit]
Grüß Gott! I notice that you list Reggianini on your user page and that you uploaded some images of his paintings from the Bonhams site last year. I am wondering, did you use dezoomify on these and if so, what is the base url for the images? I found a few more Reggianini paintings at Bonhams and I can't get it to work with Bonhams. Or is there another way to access the original image? Thanks for any help! Laura1822 (talk) 19:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC) p.s. I spent a semester in Wien as an undergraduate but my German is pretty poor after all these years, so I am writing in English. What a beautiful city!
|
|
File:AbrahamSolomon-FirstClass-TheMeeting-RevisedVersion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
