User talk:Aurelio de Sandoval/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Valued Image Promotion
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Venustiano Carranza by Harris & Ewing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benito Juárez by anonymous author.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
'.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pancho Villa by anonymous author.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
|
File:Sakura Kinomoto fan art.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Charlie Hazbin Hotel.jpg
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Charlie Hazbin Hotel.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Charlie Hazbin Hotel.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ganímedes (talk) 17:18, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 |
File:Fc Juárez logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
ManFromNord (talk) 13:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
File:México fc (1).svg was recently deleted
File:México fc (1).svg was recently deleted by EugeneZelenko, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request. Reason for deletion : Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo. Making too many problematic un-deletion requests can lead to administrative actions. It's best to discusses with the admin who deleted your file before filing an un-deletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
File:México fc.png was recently deleted
File:México fc.png was recently deleted by EugeneZelenko, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request. Reason for deletion : Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo. Making too many problematic un-deletion requests can lead to administrative actions. It's best to discusses with the admin who deleted your file before filing an un-deletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Club Santos Laguna logo.png was recently deleted
File:Club Santos Laguna logo.png was recently deleted by EugeneZelenko, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request. Reason for deletion : Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo. Making too many problematic un-deletion requests can lead to administrative actions. It's best to discusses with the admin who deleted your file before filing an un-deletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
RE:Reversión
Sí voy a seguir revirtiendo la imagen. La foto que estás subiendo es una foto rotada, esto hace que AMLO quede en una postura antinatural. Deja de sobrescribir el archivo, subelo en un archivo diferente. --BartocX (talk) 02:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- @BartocX: Está usted equivocado el decir ese argumento ilógico de :"esto hace que AMLO quede en una postura antinatural", yo no veo ninguna "antinaturalidad", voy a pedir consenso al usuario original para ver si el lo permite.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 01:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- @BartocX: Más antinatural se ve su versión de la imagen y que está muy inclinada, y usted me dice antinatural--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 01:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Re: AMLO
Hello, thank you for writing me, answering your question, you cannot add that version because it already exists in another file (File:AMLO 2020.jpg) and adding to the one you request would be inappropriate.
Also, I don't recommend rotating the file because it would look unpleasant, it's better to leave it like that. Regards.--Dimartz (talk) 16:29, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
RE: Gatell
Estás equivocado. Si alguien no está de acuerdo con el cambio que hiciste, ya es razón suficiente para que dejes de sobrescribir el archivo (vease COM:UPLOADWAR). --BartocX (talk) 02:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Venom cosplay.jpg was recently deleted
File:Venom cosplay.jpg was recently deleted by Ymblanter for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Copyright violation: Flickr account from bad authors list
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 17:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
advertising
Hello, can you please explain why you are advertising Samsung and Motorola in your posts on VIC. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: In spanish plese, english is very complex on this site, I still don't speak it well, please speak to me in Spanish-- Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 23:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
¿Puede explicar por qué anuncia Samsung y Motorola? del traductor de Google. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: Es parte de mi firma-- Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 13:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
No debería publicar anuncios en Wikipedia. 1 puedo sugerirle que elimine los logotipos Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: en ninguna parte de wikipedia dice que está prohibido, si lo hago y restauro mi firma, no se eliminarán las otras firmas que he hecho, además eso anuncios son imágenes libres.-- Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 00:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Consejo
Te recomiendo que no sobrescribas archivos para remplazarlos por un recorte de baja resolución. Si quieres hacerlo, súbelo como un archivo distinto. No lo sobrescribas. --BartocX (talk) 04:24, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Por favor, lee COM:UPLOADWAR. No solamente el autor puede oponerse a sobrescribir el archivo, también otros usuarios pueden hacerlo. --BartocX (talk) 18:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- @BartocX: bajo ese argumento yo puedo hacerte lo mismo, puedo revertir tus recortes.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Ya me lo han hecho. Cuando eso sucede, dejo de hacer guerra de ediciones y subo el archivo como uno diferente. --BartocX (talk) 21:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- @BartocX: Lo que yo estoy viendo con vos es que estás imponiendo tu ley modificando cualquier imagen que a usted no le parece, creyendote de alguna manera el dueño de las imágenes, si sigues en ese rumbo te voy a acusar con un administrador y que él decida lo que es conveniente, ya te he visto en la Wikipedia español que te han bloqueado y acusado de arbitrario, te pido que te calmes--
Aurelio de Sandoval 
(talk)
|
|
File:Durcal in Havana Mural.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 08:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of young Jackson Pollock.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Enrique Peña Nieto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Hugo López-Gatell Ramírez.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Retrato Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla con estandarte por Antonio Fabrés en Palacio Nacional (México) (Portrait of Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla with banner by Antonio Fabrés in National Palace (Mexico)).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Retrato Vicente Guerrero por Anacleto Escutia en Palacio Nacional (Mexico) (Portrait of Vicente Guerrero by Anacleto Escutia in Palacio Nacional (Mexico)).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Retrato Ignacio Allende por Ramón Pérez en Palacio Nacional (México) (Portrait of Ignacio Allende by Ramón Pérez in Palacio Nacional (México)).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Courtyard of National Palace of Mexico.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Emiliano Zapata with autograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Andrés Guardado.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Javier Hernández Balcázar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Héctor Herrera shot during game play.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carlos Salcedo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emiliano Zapata in parade uniform wearing sombrero.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antonio Aguilar, movie still..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
|
File:Dynamite BTS (musical group).svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Chiyako92 (talk) 10:39, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Dynamite BTS (musical group).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— billinghurst sDrewth 12:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Para la guerra de ediciones.
Ya te dije que lo subas como un archivo separado. Commons:Overwriting_existing_files/es#Cambios_controvertidos_o_impugnados: "Los cambios en un archivo que es probable que se impugnen deben subirse a un nombre de archivo separado. Las guerras de subidas (una forma de guerra de ediciones en la que los colaboradores suben repetidamente diferentes versiones de un archivo en un esfuerzo por que su versión sea la visible) son siempre indeseables. Al igual que con otras formas de guerra de edición, los usuarios que participan en guerras de subida pueden ser impedidos de realizar ediciones.
Si otro editor piensa que un cambio no es una mejora (incluso si el editor que realiza el cambio lo considera menor), el cambio puede ser revertido. Una vez que se ha revertido un cambio, la nueva imagen debe subirse con un nuevo nombre de archivo (a menos que el editor de la reversión esté de acuerdo explícita o implícitamente con el cambio impugnado)." --BartocX (talk) 03:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- @BartocX: Aun no me contestas sobre los argumentos que tengo acerca de ti y de tu necia forma arbitraria de revertir lo que no te gusta, ya tienes 2 strikes al tercero y si te denuncio y tengo evidencia sobre ti y te la coloque en tu discusion asi que te pido por favor que tengas cuidado y te calmes porque sabes que lo voy a hacer y vas a perder.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)
Congratulations, dear license reviewer
Hi Aurelio de Sandoval, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.
Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!
Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Chiapas montaje.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
187.135.211.229 22:59, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Aborto en Argentina
Se suspendió la medida cautelar. https://www.pagina12.com.ar/348957-aborto-legal-suspenden-la-medida-cautelar-del-juez-de-mar-de --JulioW4rrior00 (talk) 19:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Please sign your postings
–Davey2010Talk 17:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Re:Documento
Hola Aurelio, la foto de Asperger no está en dominio público aún. Los derechos de autor en Alemania son 70 años pma y Asperger murió en 1980. El documento si lo está, con la licencia que has puesto, así que lo mejor es borrar la imagen y subir solo el documento. Esperaré hasta que me respondas por si no has guardado copia en tu ordenador. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:10, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Cookie: Pero tengo entendido que el documento y la foto vinieron juntos por esta razón la subí, ya que la foto forma parte del documento porque era su cartilla del Partido Nazi, pero si tengo la imagen, solo digo la foto forma parte de su documento porque era su cartilla, inclusive acá en Commons tenemos fotos con documentos juntas del Partido Nazi, aún con todo esto que te comento, ¿Quieres que solo suba el documento?--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)
- Aurelio, ese documento no es una cartilla de afiliación a ningún partido. Es la aprobación de la NSDAP de Viena para recibir la capacitación postdoctoral que solicitó Asperger. Puedes verlo aquí. Si en la fuente de donde has sacado la imagen aparece la foto junto al documento, imagino que será a modo ilustrativo, porque el documento es una simple acreditación, no una cartilla ni un carnet de identidad. Por lo tanto, borro el archivo, ya que incumple la política de copyright. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:12, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Cookie: No hace falta, voy a subir como me dijiste sólo el documento sin la foto.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 02:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Re:Revisión
Ya están revisadas. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:06, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Re:File:Dynamite BTS (musical group).svg
Consulta cerrada. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:05, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
RE: File:Dynamite BTS (musical group).svg
Good morning, Aurelio. Albums covers, book covers and the likes are usually copyrighted artworks. This file consists of a simple logo, but it's still an album cover, therefore I had doubts about its admissibility on Commons; we already had a couple BTS album logos that were deleted because they were considered too artsy before despite being marked the same. The deletion procedure is now closed, though, with a Keep result, so it's apparently simple enough to fall within the logo classification; it will be a useful precedent going on. Have a nice day and weekend. --Chiyako92 (talk) 07:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- I think the complexity of a design varies case by case, and generalizations can't be easily made. Anyway, the matter about this file is closed now. --Chiyako92 (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Re:Aprobación
Sí, excepto el poster de Yun Bo-seon, que es de 1967. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 18:39, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Re:Consulta
Si las leyes de Corea del Sur son más estrictas es mejor que decidan los editores y/o administradores que las conozcan. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Re:Emblema
Hola, no sé si bajo el regimen actual prohibirán su uso. Es una subida muy antigua y de momento nadie la ha cuestionado. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Re:Dominio público
Hola Aurelio, ninguna de las fotos es válida. La de Flickr porque habría que saber la fecha de fallecimiento de cada uno de los seis personajes y, por supuesto, que los seis estuvieran en dominio público. La galería de Damaso Pérez porque la duración del copyright en México es muy larga 100 años y para las otras fotos de Cuba habría que poder demostrar que se publicaron por primera vez en Cuba y se utilizaron allí, sin cumplir con las formalidades de derechos de autor de los Estados Unidos, antes del 20 de febrero de 1972. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- En la de República dominicana ya ha expirado el plazo de copyright, pero para la foto de La Habana deberías buscar una fuente cubana o similar donde se demuestre su publicación antes de 1972. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Re:Aprobación
Done. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Re:Aprobación
Done. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Re: Revisión
Te lo agradezco mucho. La licencia está al final de las imágenes un poco antes de llegar al pie de la página. BAJI 20:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Re: Vimeo
En el escritorio puedes encontrarla haciendo click en "ver más", que está cerca del nombre del canal. La licencia aparece abajo de la fecha de subida. BAJI 17:22, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
|
|
File:BTS - Dynamite (official cover).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Re:Hepatitis Mexico
Hi Aurelio de Sandoval, does the map of Mexico need to colored the in this file? (I don't know why you reverted your edit on my talk page, so I would like to make sure, thanks) --BlackShadowG (talk) 00:23, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Inquiry about photo requests in Mexico City
Hi! I was looking to see if somebody could photograph the main entrance of the en:Liceo Mexicano Japones in Mexico City. I don't know if that location is convenient for you, or if it would be more convenient for another user.
Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 02:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
José Alfredo Jiménez.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lola Beltrán.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jorge Negrete.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Luis Aguilar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agustín Lara.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Fotos de la pandemia
Hola Aurelio, gusto en saludarte. Creo que ya subí a commons lo que tengo de cuando fue la pandemia 🤔 lo que pasa es que en esa época anduve chambeando y no pude concentrarme en eso tanto como quería. 2806:107E:10:72E4:548A:BF7A:1BEF:F815 20:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
|
|
File:Feminismo radical.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wikisaurus (talk) 14:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Victoriano Huerta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enrique Camarena.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Major League Baseball logos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hans Asperger.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flag of Mexico, current version, approved 1968.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg/Archive_of_previous_reviews&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg/Archive_of_previous_reviews&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg/Archive_of_previous_reviews&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
