User talk:Airwolf/2009

Image:RYAN command center.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:RYAN command center.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 19:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Mejor Club del Siglo XX.JPG

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Mejor Club del Siglo XX.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Dodo 15:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay, I've been busy. The former image looked like an obvious copyright violation: it's a photo of a videowall or something showing the photo of 3 Real Madrid's presidents taking a cup. Unless you can prove that the photographer was at that ceremony and give us the proper permission over the photo, I'm afraid this is just another unauthorized derivative work. Regards. --Dodo 07:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I've read something about football championships' cups and such being protected by copyright. So I don't really know if this is the case or not. But cropping an "illegal" photo always gives you a fragment of an "illegal" photo. --Dodo 12:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing 737-400 Centralwings.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Let_L410UVP-E16_Góraszka_2008.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Let_L410UVP-E16_Góraszka_2008.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 18:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PZL-101 Gawron Góraszka 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A very illustrative picture for that plane. --Ikiwaner 20:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jak-18 Góraszka 2008 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good Ianare 15:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piper L-4H Grasshopper Góraszka 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically is good. To obtain better composition in a frame next time put more free space in front of motion direction (in this one it should be more sky on the right side).--Kosiarz-PL 18:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

File:Mil Mi-2 LPR.jpg

Bardzo ładny kiedyś opis do File:SAR 5137.jpg.Czy teraz mogę prosić byś podpisał File:Mil Mi-2 LPR.jpg? Podejrzewam, że to Mil Mi-2 Plus, ale nie jestem pewien, a Ciebie uważam za znawcę w tym temacie. :) Zwiadowca ²¹ 18:27, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token b93e0177f52b40be6692eec8ba30da0b

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell 407 Góraszka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good shot! --George Chernilevsky 20:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Żelazny

OK, sprzątam category:Poland i chciałem to gdzieś wrzucić, żeby nie leżało w głównej kategorii. Jeśli możesz to przepnij do lepszej kategorii. Yarl ✉ 10:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zlin Żelazny Góraszka 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great! Yann 16:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belgian Westland Sea King Radom 2007 photo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belgian Westland Sea King Radom 2007 photo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Straż miejska, to po angielsku...

...city guard. Spotkałem się prywatnie z określeniem policja bez uprawnień policji. Ale nie są oni policją. Więc kategoria wprowadza w błąd. Oparłem się o Wikipedię :-) Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 00:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Ponieważ o niebo lepiej znasz angielski, muszę przyznać Ci rację. Ale to oznacza konieczność poprawek interwiki w poszczególnych wersjach językowych odpowiedniego hasła. Zatem, czy mógłbyś?

Czy następujące pliki mają prawidłowe nazwy i są w odpowiednich kategoriach?:

• File:Prague city guard, policeman.jpg
• File:Zabrze city guard.jpg
• File:Building of city guard in Třebíč, Czech Republic.jpg

Pozdrawiam, --Starscream (talk) 16:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Teraz wszystko rozumiem. Dziękuję. --Starscream (talk) 22:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jak-18 Góraszka 2008 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 08:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PZL-101 Gawron Góraszka 2008 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Ianare 20:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airbus 320-200 Wizz Air 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Like it, especially the engine air --Schlurcher 21:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AirbusA380 ILA2006 corrected.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Even if a little noised on shadows, I like it! --Marcok 22:53, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airbus 320-200 Wizz Air 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F-16 Solo Display Team Radom 2009 b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Kirua 09:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Su-27UBM Radom 2009 b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, tiny detali are good visible --George Chernilevsky 10:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Arrows mid-air kiss, Radom 2009 edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --George Chernilevsky 08:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F-16 Solo Display Team Radom 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice details --Cesco77 12:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Su-27UBM Radom 2009 c.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, clear picture. --NormanB 00:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

How much...

Hi there. I did this F-16, let me know if I missed anything. And I've finished this one: File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 m.JPG. I've come to bother you on your talk page because I want to know if you are ok with the slightly upped vibrance and the noise removal. I can just remove the dust spots, if you want; the other things might not be "improvements" for everyone. So just let me know if you rather I didn't do those things, :-) Thanks! Maedin\^talk 19:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Arrows Radom 2009 c.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catalina 3 Góraszka 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot --Tiptoety 11:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Su-27UBM Radom 2009 e.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PZL-104 Wilga Góraszka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment} Good quality, but I'd crop it more on the right side. -- H005 22:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)  Comment minor correction request - spots on the sky --George Chernilevsky 12:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC)  Done Spots are now taken care of. Maedin 05:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Looks OK now. Lycaon 08:01, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 b.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 b.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 07:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

A mnie się podoba

zwłaszcza, że się unosi :-) Zobaczymy jak inni zareagują. Jedyny problem to uwagi techniczne :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 10:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

• Skurczybyk :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
• Wycofałem. Temat był świetny. Kadr rewelacyjny. Pewne mankamety, które tak mocno eksponowano są do dyskusji. Nie przechodzili obojętnie obok tej fotografii. Sam sobie odpowiedz dlaczego nie, i dlczego tak szybko reagowano :-) Na każdego (samolota) przyjdzie pora :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 18:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
F-16 Solo Display Team.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

It seems strange to illustrate a team with a picture of a single plane. Yann (talk) 23:15, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Info Speak to the Dutch. It was their idea to say that a single plane is a team. I guess that's why they added Solo. In other words: this is the entire "team" (save the ground support guys, of course). Airwolf (talk) 23:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
  • OK, so  Neutral. I feel I am not competent to say if this is the best picture to illustrate this scope. Yann (talk) 09:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
    • It is a team because it consists of the pilot, two instructors and seven ground crew. Lycaon (talk) 08:26, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support If that plane is "Solo Display Team" (and I trust Airwolf that it is), this is the definite picture of it. -- JovanCormac 15:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The scope is not unique: there are two solo display teams! Lycaon (talk) 23:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
  •  Info A new category has been created and the scope has been changed accordingly. Airwolf (talk) 08:55, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Solo Display Team to F-16 Solo Display Team --Lycaon (talk) 09:23, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support with new (unambiguous) scope. Lycaon (talk) 09:23, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support As above. -- JovanCormac 09:32, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 12:45, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! An-2 Góraszka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Categories for discussion/Current requests/2009/09/Category:Aircraft by registration

Category discussion notification

Commons:Categories for discussion/Current requests/2009/09/Category:Aircraft by registration has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-- User:Docu at 12:10, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Każdy mój wybór

jest słuszny :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

• i na każdego przyjdzie kolej :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hanomag Zlot Darłowo 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would be a great picture without the van in the background, but acceptable as QI even with it. -- H005 22:13, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell 407 Góraszka 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --George Chernilevsky 13:06, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing-Stearman N2S Góraszka 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for an airplane in flight. -- JovanCormac 11:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing PT-27A-75N1 Stearman Góraszka 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for an airplane in flight. -- JovanCormac 11:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belgian F-16 Radom 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good QI -- George Chernilevsky 14:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-55 Zlot Darłowo 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I dislike the cropped wind turbine on the right. Maybe it can be recropped? -- JovanCormac 11:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)  Comment The only thing I can do about it is cut it off completely. This here is the original size o the picture. Airwolf 11:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)  Support Very good QI for me -- George Chernilevsky 14:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Let L410UVP-E16 Góraszka 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 16:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:BMP-1 Zlot Darłowo 2009.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:BMP-1 Zlot Darłowo 2009.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:01, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ursus Darłowo 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is Łukasz Golowanow a Wikipedian? --Mbdortmund 13:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC) That happens to be me. Airwolf 13:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)*g* sorry --Mbdortmund 15:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell 407 Góraszka 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- JovanCormac 11:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)  Question The left crop is rather tight - any chance to make it wider? -- H005 18:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)  Comment On the original image itself - no. However, since there are no clouds there, it should be easy to "stretch" the blue sky a bit to the right without it being noticeable. Airwolf 09:18, 28 September 2009 (UTC) That would most certainly make it much better. -- H005 16:16, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Arrows Radom 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Johannes Robalotoff 20:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belgian F-16 Radom.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok -- George Chernilevsky 20:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Bull Cobra Góraszka 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It seems that there was some dust and dirt on the lense; please see my image annotations. Can you fix that? Also geotag is missing (not required for QI, but preferred). Can you fix that too? Finally I feel that the crop could be a bit tighter, so the helicopter would have a little less Headroom. --NormanB 20:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC) * Comment I'll have it fixed tomorrow (I hope). Airwolf 20:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)  Info I've uploaded a new version, without the dustspots an generally retouched. See, if you like it now. If you think the previous colours were better, let me know by reverting, I'll re-upload it just with the dustspots cleaned. Airwolf 14:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC)  Support now excellent result -- George Chernilevsky 18:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC)  Support Excellent work! Big improvement, definitely QI now. --NormanB 23:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midnight Hawks Radom 2009 b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sandboarding in Dubai.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sandboarding in Dubai.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 07:08, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell 407.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met, excellent showing this helicopter in action -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eurocopter EC 135 Góraszka 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Meulaboh Hovercraft 050110-N-7586B-120.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Meulaboh Hovercraft 050110-N-7586B-120.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

In recognition.

I know you're not a fan of bug pictures, but...

....That was how they made the barnstar. :P For bringing interesting and well taken photographs and opinions to Commons, not being afraid to shake up the system a bit, as well as taking criticism in your stride, and of course, for some excellent photography of a subject that seems to be shunned on Commons, I award you the Exceptional Newcomer Barnstar. Wear it with pride, for a job well done. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 22:29, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boeing 737-400 Centralwings 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good -- George Chernilevsky 09:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PZL-130 Orlik Goraszka 2008 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The right plane is not really sharp, but overall acceptable considering the conditions. -- H005 20:05, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JAS-39 Gripen down under.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment File size is very small. --Cayambe 10:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)  Comment I know, but there is nothing I can do about it, unfortunately. Airwolf 12:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC) The good educational value mitigates for the just average technical quality. After all it's not easy to capture a flying jetfighter sharp. -- H005 16:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Equus asinus Kadzidłowo 002.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Equus asinus Kadzidłowo 002.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:03, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polish combat aircraft, Radom 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good IMO. --Cayambe 07:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Louis Armstrong2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Louis Armstrong2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Gluehlampe 01 KMJ.jpg

Was it just a co-incidence that you mentioned File:Gluehlampe 01 KMJ.jpg in our FPC talk page discussion, it is one of the very few (maybe only ;-) image that I have ever nominated for de-listing, strangely the delisting nomination failed! :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 01:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:PZL-101 Gawron.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I find it hard to choose between the candidate and File:PZL-101 Gawron Góraszka 2008 3.JPG. -- JovanCormac 12:00, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
  • I wouldn't take this one into consideration, personally. It shows the airplane from a, let's call it, non-encylopedic angle - too much of the bottom, to little of the side. Airwolf (talk) 12:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Info Since there haven't been any votes yet, I've changed the scope. I think a scope of a single plane - which is not notable in its own right - is too narrow. I've changed it to a scope for the airplane type. Airwolf (talk) 13:54, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support all criteria met. Excellent contibution, nice and high-quality -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:10, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 08:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Equus asinus Kadzidłowo 001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Equus asinus Kadzidłowo 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:08, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polski C-130 Radom.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It could use a bit more brightness, but it still looks good. --JoeJohnson2 06:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)  Commentretracting my promotion of this image because of the license issue.. please try to sort this out --JoeJohnson2 07:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)  Info There is nothing wrong with the license. Airwolf 09:41, 15 October 2009 (UTC)  Comment Ok, scratch that then. --JoeJohnson2 16:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Louis Armstrong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best portrait we have. --Eusebius (talk) 15:08, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:43, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

FPC

Ups... Mie mam w tym doświadczenia. Możesz to zrobić, a ja popatrzę. Przepraszam za kłopot. Albertus teolog (talk) 20:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:U S Air Force Thunderbirds.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:U S Air Force Thunderbirds.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:14, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Updates

What do you think? File:Zlin Żelazny Góraszka 2.JPG and File:Ursus Darłowo 2009.JPG. Maedin\^talk 18:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Arrows Radom 2009 i.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 11:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:B17g and b52h in flight.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:B17g and b52h in flight.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:02, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cessna C560 Excel CS-DXG Gdańsk landing.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 20:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piper Cub Góraszka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belgian Westland Sea King, Radom 2007.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:36, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Pacynka :-)

chyba pacynem Albertus teolog (talk) 13:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMP-1 Zlot Darłowo 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 21:14, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Pilsudski 1910 1920 LOC hec 14263 restored.jpg

Hej. Masz może plik oczyszczony, ale przed kadrowaniem (obcięciem podpisu)? --Leafnode✉ 16:51, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Pilsudski 1910 1920 LOC hec 14263 restored-2.jpg - połączyłem oryginał z Twoją modyfikacją, i dodałem trochę swojego retuszu :) --Leafnode✉ 18:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Oczywiście wykorzystałem Twoją pracę - generalnie to jest 'Twój' plik + doklejone więcej dookoła :) Ale NPA nie ma, bo oznaczyłeś to jako PD, więc attribution nie jest wymagane to raz, link do oryginału dałem to dwa, i wymieniłem autorów obu plików, tak jak zostały oznaczone w ich opisach (w 'Twoim' pliku dalej fotograf figuruje jako autor:)) to trzy :) Ale tak na poważnie, to do uploadowania derivatiwów używam derivatFX i się specjalnie nie zastanawiam, jeśli przypadek jest oczywisty - derivatFX sam wszystko załatwia :) --Leafnode✉ 18:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ursus C-451.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Pudelek (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment File:URSUS C451.jpg shows that this model can have a retractable roof, which is an additional information, but the nominated image nicely displays this tractor in action. By the way, what is this action? Farming works? A race? So a  Request it would be useful to add a description in English or in another language. Thanks in advance, --Myrabella (talk) 23:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
  •  Info. Starting from the end. a) description in English added; b) If I remember correctly, at that particular moment it wasn't doing anything useful, the teenager there was just having fun driving aroung but in the long run it was supposed to help in pulling smaller vehicles out of here; c) it's a fact I can't really argue with, nevertheless, as far as I know my compatriots, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that those roofs were user-installed and had nothing to do with what the factory offered. Wolf (talk) 00:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
    •  Comment Thanks for the adjuncts. Concerning the roof: see the page on Ursus website presenting the C-451 model. Does "brezentowa budka dla kierowcy" mean that a retractable soft-top could be factory provided? (it's a pity I can't read Polish, I have used the Google translation tool ;-). --Myrabella (talk) 14:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
      • I'm impressed. Yes, it does, apparently I've underestimated the factory... Wolf (talk) 14:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I finally oppose, firstly because the nominated image doesn't show the factory provided retractable soft-top, which is one of the characteristics of this model (another image in Commons do), secondly because it represents the military type of this model (if I understand the context correctly, thanks again for the added description)—but it seems that the main use of this tractor was civilian, in agriculture (as far as I understand this page, for example). --Myrabella (talk) 15:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment As I said, I've got no way to argue about the roof, that's fair. But I don't think there was any "civilian" or "military" model as far as any potential differences are concerned. There was simply no place for any military modifications (like what, a machine gun? ) because the idea behind it was simplicity. I believe you mean it because of the fact that the picture was taken at a show that's military by name. But not only military vehicles appear there, you will also find police cars (like this one) or purely civilian ones (like the motorbike on the left) if they are old enough of for some reason interesting. By the way, how about learning some Polish? I'm sure you'd like it (though the level of diffculty would probably get you crazy). Wolf (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
    • It is not only because of the name of the event, but also on account of the military khaki color of the vehicle, and owing to what I read in the :en:article about Ursus Factory: "In 1930, the Ursus factory fell on hard times due to the world financial crisis and was nationalized under the Państwowe Zakłady Inżynieryjne (National Engineering Works, PZInż), the Polish manufacturer of arms and vehicles. It then began producing military tractors, tanks and other heavy machinery for troops." So, as this company used to produce military tractors (at least for a period), I think it's important to have an image without any possible ambiguity regarding this aspect. Side comment: About Polish, yes, you guess it right, I'd like to learn it (and not only Polish!). If only I had a thousand lives to live... --Myrabella (talk) 18:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
      • So an MVReview, perhaps? And just as comments. 1) This is the military tractor produced by Usrsus for PZInż. 2) A joke: Radio Moscow reports: Less than an hour ago Chinese troops attacked the Soviet Union. Three Chinese armored divisions attacked a tractor peacefully attending agricultural work. The tractor fired back, repelled the attack and flew off to the east to provide air cover for courageous Soviet soldiers. Wolf (talk) 18:18, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Photo very good shows a tractor. It is a valuable picture, because it presents a tractor in the "natural conditions". Dirt, while driving and not on the road. I assure you that in times when the tractor was produced the roof was "exclusivity" rarely used. Associated with the military are symbolic. Albertus teolog (talk) 12:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 8 Batalion Remontowy Kołobrzeg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Berthold Werner 13:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airbus 320-200 Wizz Air 2 c.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments noise imo accaptable --Mbdortmund 12:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turkish Stars in Kecskemet 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Award :-)

			* The Aviation Barnstar *
			I hereby award Łukasz Golowanow a.k.a. user Airwolf Thank you for excellent photos of aircraft! Well done! -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

You can copy this award block to self user page :) -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dutch F-16 performing in Kecskemet corr1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 12:06, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zlin Żelazny Góraszka 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zlin Żelazny Góraszka 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pilsudski 1910 1920 LOC hec 14263 restored.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pilsudski 1910 1920 LOC hec 14263 restored.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Victims of German air raid.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support These reasons, as discussed above. Albertus teolog (talk) 22:03, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 18:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Belgian F-16 Radom.JPG FPC

Hi Airwolf, the recent edits have improved the image—CA which I though unimportant removed, contrast improved with the colour change and apparent sharpness is better probably as a result of the contrast change. There are though a lot of obvious dust spots that I can see at 800 × 483px size (more visible at full size). If you can fix these dust-spots then I think the image meets the criteria. Your camera's sensor is almost as dirty as I sometimes let mine become ! - Peripitus (talk) 01:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMP-1 Darłowo 2009 b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 14:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airbus 320-200 Wizz Air.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ursus Darłowo 2009 b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 14:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC) actually a very good image. However I would consider a square crop even better. --Ikiwaner 22:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

You've asked for a helicopter

Here we go File:Helicopter is taking off Greenland ice sheet 1.jpg :)--Mbz1 (talk) 19:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 9K35 Strieła-10 Darłowo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, of course I wish nothing were cut off, but still good.--Mbz1 02:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TS-8 Bies Góraszka 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well Done -- 320td 17:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catalina Góraszka 2008 204.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition. Please add the location tag. --MattiPaavola 13:21, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
HMCS St. John's (FFH 340).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose as not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 5 (should be geocoded, but is not). "All images are expected to be geocoded unless it would not be appropriate to do so". I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC) - Ok, fixed - Rastaman3000 (talk) 16:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

• Oww, so stupid of me. Done now. Wolf (talk) 18:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support The best in the category. The composition is much better than in the one with the helicopter. -- MattiPaavola (talk) 13:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Why is this ship notable enough to warrant a VI scope? --Eusebius (talk) 22:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Let me answer this way: it's the general practice on Wikipedias to make separate articles about each warship. Thus, if this ship already has (or is going to have) an article, I believe, there's also place for a VI scope. Wolf (talk) 22:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Info I've added some annotations to make the image even more valuable Wolf (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:15, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

The "Moscow" cruiser.

Hi, Łukasz!

• Thank You for the added information. You are good militarist.
• Camera location is OK, photo was taken from a boat

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eurocopter EC 135 Góraszka 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good choice for an exposure time to motion blur the rotor, but not the body. --MattiPaavola 23:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RWD 5R Góraszka 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Would you mind cropping a bit from everywhere? You would then get rid of the distracting billboard on the left at the same time. Otherwise good. --MattiPaavola 20:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)  Question How about now? --Airwolf 22:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC) Better now, thanks. --MattiPaavola 23:07, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 9K35 Strieła-10 Darłowo 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done photo in action. Wow - dirty vehicle! --George Chernilevsky 19:13, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Runway photo descriptions

Hi Airwolf, You seem to be taking lots of valuable quality aircraft photos. Thank you very much! May I ask you something: would you like to add to the descriptions of the future photos if the plane is taking off or landing (or just taxing) (if you still remember when uploading to Commons :-)). It is sometimes really difficult to see from just looking at the photo later and I think it would be a nice little detail to mention in the captions when using your quality shots in WP articles. Just a minor suggestion, if you will.

Thanks, --MattiPaavola (talk) 17:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Belgian F-16 Radom cleaned denoised brightened.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belgian F-16 Radom cleaned denoised brightened.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embraer ERJ-145MP SP-LGM 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent moment. --MattiPaavola 11:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euro Mediterranean Boeing 757-2Q8 Gdańsk 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 08:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euro Mediterranean Boeing 757-2Q8 Gdańsk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Could be sharper, but nice to see the jet stream on the right. --MattiPaavola 12:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M28 Skytruck Góraszka 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good control of motion! Well done. --MattiPaavola 16:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HMCS St. John's Gdynia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

RWD-5 VI

Hi, Łukasz!

Photo not geocoded. Please, add it.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:54, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yellow PZL-104 Wilga Góraszka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Eusebius 21:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midnight Hawks Radom 2009 h.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. --MattiPaavola 17:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zlin 143LS Góraszka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 9K35 Strieła-10 Darłowo 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice "action" shot! --Leviathan1983 11:59, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Curtiss Jenny Radom 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot! --Leviathan1983 07:06, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAN fire truck Królewo 5700.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think its a little bit tilted. Maybe 1-2° clockwise... --Leviathan1983 07:06, 17 December 2009 (UTC)  Question How about now? Note that the truck is turning to the left at the moment, so it's leaning to the right. Airwolf 10:38, 17 December 2009 (UTC) Better now! Qi for me. --Leviathan1983 11:56, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
RWD-5.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support really best in scope and geocoded. Criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:53, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 09:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Mbz1 (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Thank you, Airwolf for one of your recent oppose vote that meant a lot to me, and helped me to get to know you better!--Mbz1 (talk) 18:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midnight Hawks Radom 2009 g.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Eusebius 22:59, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M28 Skytruck Góraszka 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 15:07, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Courtesy of Chico, the Official Commons Christmas Puggle. :P

Many thanks for providing some inspired aerial photography for our enjoyment. I hope you'll stick with us for 2010! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 07:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

:)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! --George Chernilevsky ^talk

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
M28 Skytruck.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support far better in scope, all criteria met. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 09:03, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

VI Mi-2 ...

... not geocoded . Please fix it --George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Bull Cobra Góraszka 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midnight Hawks Radom 2009 i.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Żelazny and Boeing Stearman 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PZL M26 Iskierka SP-DIF Radom 2009 9651.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now IMO. --Cayambe 10:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HNLMS De Ruyter (F804) NATO Gdynia 25 05 07 200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks good, except the colour noise. Could it be reduced? I could give it a try. Airwolf 20:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC) How about now? Airwolf 21:37, 28 December 2009 (UTC) Colour noise is fine, but now it looks oversharpened. Could you have another look? :-) ElHeineken 05:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC)  Support good now --George Chernilevsky 08:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)