User talk:Acabashi/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:Arnold Burrowes Kemball.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 03:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:The White Hart, Crowle

Hi, I've restored the lost information in this category; although I don't normally approve of categories containing only one image, it is always possible that a new image may be uploaded, in which case it makes sense to have the category populated. I have also added the {{Listed building England}} template, but the link to the English Heritage website seems to be broken at present, and I'll look at that when I have more time to spare. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Fair enough. I've been trying to tidy up the Crowle cat and sub cats as there were so many disparate pics to wade through on the main page, some repeated in the sub cats. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:City_of_London_Cemetery_and_Crematorium_chapels

Category:City_of_London_Cemetery_and_Crematorium_chapels has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Motacilla (talk) 08:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:Heritage_units_of_the_United_Kingdom

Category:Heritage_units_of_the_United_Kingdom has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Andy Dingley (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

What's the story with this file

Hi Acabashi. What's the story with this file? Will it be possible to use it very soon? Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 08:12, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, you can use it any way and whenever per license. It was taken by me, per Exif details, at a vintage auto day display, and is a common exhibit in similar displays at the same venue... other images of the car are on the web but might not be free to use. Details of the car was found here. Best. Acabashi (talk) 21:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Acabashi, I linked this topic to the Wikimedia page not the image so that all the strange fuss about licensing would show. Why is it there? Sorry to make a fuss but I was sure you can explain better than anyone. I hate it when I put an image on display in an article and suddenly its replaced by a whole lot of red script. Regards, Eddaido (talk) 00:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back, but I am a little confused Eddaido... probably my fault. Which topic of which Wikimedia page are you referring to ? Does the "strange fuss about licensing" refer to the stuff I add to images permission or something else ? Let's assume the first is the case... After having one of my images put on Facebook without proper attribution I asked for advice from copyright project editors. They said that there is no way to stop people from abusing copyright, even with the latest more tightened cc-by-sa-4.0., and that Wikimedia officialdom will not offer any help. However, any commercial user of files will tend to acknowledge authorship. The extended notes I add to files just reiterates what cc-by-sa-4.0 states, but in a stronger form that will be immediately apparent to anyone wanting to use the file... it is unlikely that people will link to Creative Commons cc-by-sa-4.0 through the template. These notes I have based on other Wikimedia photo uploaders who largely appear professional or semi-professional photographers with their own web sites. What I add strongly emphasises but does no run against the licence stated. I hope this helps. Acabashi (talk) 05:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

indeed. See below and above. Eddaido (talk) 06:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

This file with all the red stuff on it not the image on it - which you changed at the head of this paragraph and replaced with the image. Surely there must be a better way than this to get the attention you want. Are you quite sure it can't be done better? Eddaido (talk) 06:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

I changed the image to a thumb, and added topic text at the head of the section to fit page convention, as when it was added on 13 November 2015‎ it filled the whole page. To understand you I need to define what you are calling 'the file' and 'the image', which can ostensibly be the same thing. When I link to the file/image page, I don't see any 'red stuff' (as script?) which I presume might mean category links... do you mean the red borders ? However, you might be referring to the complete photo within the page itself... again 'the file' and 'the image' could equally refer to the photo. Perhaps you mean as 'the image', the Rover car within the whole picture. Let's assume 'red stuff' means part of the complete photo as it stands, and that your enquiry concerns the red car and the red berries on the pyracantha behind the Rover. If this is the case, the red car and pyracantha berries sets-off the colour neutrality of the Rover, and the texture of the red and green pyracantha, and the texture of the grass sets off the smoothness of the Rover, which I felt was a strong enough part of the photo to accommodate this. We are often limited by prevailing conditions when taking a photo... in this case for a three-quarter angle there was no option but for that background. There may be a case for reducing the red by desaturating it in Photoshop if it is felt that it is too strong, however, this is purely a matter of individual taste. Desaturating one colour and leaving the others saturated as taken can, but not always, give that unnatural feeling of digital-overmanipulation. Before uploading I did consider cropping the photo at the right, but compositionally this crowded the face/front of the Rover, which, like the human face, for visual comfort and basic composition strategy needs more space to look into when balanced with the space behind the subject. There is also another balance to strike... the photo as purely a banal document of a particular subject, with the quality of the photo itself as aesthetic expression... both are not always necessarily exclusive. If you mean a moot necessity of the added copyright notes, the answer is above and should not affect any linking... if this is so, there may be a case to formulate a template to take care of the script I suppose. I have tried my best to understand and answer what I think are your concerns from the opening statement of this discussion.... I don't think I can do much more. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 15:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, I'm sure I asked for all that. You persist in talking about the picture and its your talk page. Do you think it helps to have all that red text stuff? (that you removed from the subject). It certainly frightened me off and made me write here to ask about it. Have a very nice day, Eddaido (talk) 22:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you too Eddaido. I persisted in talking about the picture here because you brought up the concern here. I don't see any red-coloured text (I'm not sure how to make letters red), in the history of the file, so I could hardly remove what was not there :) Anyway, if the the whole thing is sorted out, then all is OK hopefully. Best wishes, Acabashi (talk) 00:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

The message I receive is that I should never have dared to comment on what you have done. Right? Eddaido (talk) 00:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

I'm still not sure as to 'what I've done', but as to "should never have dared", not at all Eddaido. I am glad for feedback as I tend to work with very little contact from others on Wikimedia. Glad to 'meet' you and happy file uploading, and maybe we will talk again on this Wiki. Acabashi (talk) 00:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

I can't believe any of that. Acerbate needs to find and use a good copy editor. Eddaido (talk) 04:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Whatever. My particular strength is in copyediting for English Wikipedia. Acerbate is an English verb or adjective, not a noun. As before, what you say is opaque. If you can't react to obvious good faith, we will leave it there. I don't want to hear from you again. Goodbye. Acabashi (talk) 04:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Acerbate was so comic under these circumstances I left it for the enjoyment of any readers. Eddaido (talk) 06:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I see you're again adjusting history to suit yourself. Regards, Eddaido (talk) 07:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Penistone railway accident viaduct collapse 1916.jpg

File:Penistone railway accident viaduct collapse 1916.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 12:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Villages_in_Essex

Villages in Essex has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Dudley Miles (talk) 23:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Defaultsort

Hi. I am just wondering what this "defaultsort ... " template is that you are adding to files. I even found it on a fairly obscure foodstuff as {{DEFAULTSORT:Phat sayongte}}. and on th even more more obscure {{DEFAULTSORT:Khao kan chin}} - Takeaway (talk) 22:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Defaultsort on Wikimedia is a method of fixing a file's cats in a more searchable general grouping to that file across all cats that have been added, or might be added, based on the major element of the file, whether that be a type of food, as in this case, or perhaps sometimes according to geographical feature or place. A lot of files are uploaded with a file name beginning with numbers, or 'the', or the indefinite article 'a' or 'an' (I have in the past been at fault here), which are all pretty meaningless and superfluous, and self-defeating as it doesn't do any favours for the file, as with all searches on and off Wikimedia it's the first word of the file name that gets picked up, with subsequent words in the file name becoming less and less important as part of the search as we run across the file name... of lesser importance, as on YouTube, is the file description. All this is particularly important as virtually all finds for our files happen outside Wikimedia in a general web search. Defaultsort can be helpful for a file in pulling all files of the same subject from all uploaders together for neatness and fairness. Acabashi (talk) 00:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Sorry to ask you all these questions but that's because I am unfamiliar with the use of "defaultsort" templates. How would the "defaultsort" work for, for instance, File:2013 Khao kan chin.jpg? - Takeaway (talk) 11:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Template:taken on

don't remove it! If you wish to add a category, go ahead. Leave this template, it is useful. Roseohioresident (talk) 19:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

I have added rationale on your page... removing the temp does not alter the date in any way. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 20:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your new category has no {{GeoGroupTemplate}}{{-}}. I like that feature of Template:taken on. Lots easier to see where photos are at, without looking through filenames. If you create a template Template:U.S. taken on that includes {{GeoGroupTemplate}}{{-}}, photos from previous and next day, and so on, I might use it. Otherwise, you are breaking something that works. Roseohioresident (talk) 20:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

I seen what you are getting at, but a loc temp can be added by the uploader if needed or can be bothered. A bigger problem as I see it is the greedy stacking of users files to the top of all cat lists... some people think they and their pics are better than others on WM and need promotion, certainly when a cat gets saturated. This unfair stacking includes adding a date at the beginning of the file to gain an unfair advantage. I split to sub cats to make the whole thing both fairer to all, and for easier use by searchers. Another good temp for fairness and better sorting is the {{DEFAULTSORT:'name'}} which I apply to my files and happily spread around the project, but this can bring on the ire of the top-of-search-greedy. I see that you have moved your files back and have become category 'top'dog' :) Perhaps if you are concerned with what I have done you will for fairness revert all my sub-catting.'... I won't be exercised about this. Acabashi (talk)

Template:taken on requires 13 keystrokes. If you object to any of my filenames, please add a {{DEFAULTSORT}} to the file. I name files based on subject, not your "top dog" criteria. Today is first I ever heard of "top dog". If that's a windmill you tilt at, good luck.Roseohioresident (talk) 21:05, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Is it possible to alter the Template:Taken on so that e.g. {{Taken on|2016-07-06|Germany}} would add the file to "Category:Photographs taken in Germany on 2016-07-06". In the case no country is given in the template, the file will be added to the "Category:Photographs taken on 2016-07-06" ? --Estormiz (talk) 06:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Excellent idea. Unfortunately, as pedantic as wikimedia can be, I can see it requiring {{taken on|2016-07-06|The United States of America}}. It would also require manually creating each sub-category. Too many keystrokes. Roseohioresident (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

{{DEFAULTSORT}} for post boxes

I've been sorting these by post box identifier as used by Royal Mail. This is so that anyone who has their list can check for omissions. I haven't yet worked out how they determine these numbers apart from the obvious postcode. Do you think this is a good idea? Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

You are probably right in this particular way of doing it, and defaultsort (however it's sorted), helps illuminate what can be quite a confusion in given file names and overlapping in UK post box cats, and in wider Wikimedia categories. I, like Motacilla, tend to defaultsort by place names, as I fondly assume most people searching the web (not just Wikimedia site files which now don't automatically show at the top of image searches), would search by location (which I fully add to all my file names). But if you are doing a major post box stint your way, I'll leave off location defaultsort in post box cats. Good luck with that arduous task. Best. Acabashi (talk) 12:31, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:Pubs in Shropshire‎

I've removed Category:Houses in Shropshire‎ because (1) we don't do this anywhere else (2) having both Houses and Buildings results in overcategorisation and (3) the categories reflect distinct purposes, although I agree that most pubs are also dwellings- but their principal purpose is as an outlet for alcoholic drinks. Merry Christmas! Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Fair enough. I added it as it was easy to link through to them with Catalot from 'Houses in Shropshire' while looking through Shropshire building images while I'm recatting the 'Shropshire' main cat, which is overblown with Geograph files. I'm going through a clean up of all counties main cat... I've done a lot here but it's a thankless task... I clean them out but more always come back in... I'm dreading the defunct Panoramio files. Season's greeting to you too. Acabashi (talk) 17:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your renaming requests

Hello Acabashi, I really have no problem to work at your renaming requests, but in my opinion you are so active here, that you can get the filemover-rights here. You can try it, if you want to. Kind regards, --Brackenheim (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Acabashi, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Henry Woods.jpg

Hi. I was just thinking about the right US copyright template for File:Henry Woods.jpg, but it would rather depend on when the image was first published. Was the postcard dated? Jarry1250 (talk) 17:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Sorry I missed this post. Have added the US temp. Post card wasn't dated, but judging Woods' dates, history, and by his look here, it is possibly 1880s. Acabashi (talk) 16:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi!

Thank you for helping out with Deletion Nominations! Your help is greatly appreciated. May I request one tiny fine-tuning? When you give a "I found this at ____" with a link, please don't use Tineye. The Tineye searches expire after a few days and we have to search the images a second time to find them. If you use Tineye to find the image, please provide the actual image URL not the Tineye search string. Again, thank you for all your help! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Point taken and absorbed. Acabashi (talk) 17:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

One more clue to improve your DRs: please use COM:VFC for mass nominations. Sealle (talk) 08:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks for that tip... I was wondering how to do that. Cheers. Acabashi (talk) 13:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Never hesitate to ask me questions; if it seems like an "embarrassing" question, use email!! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:Photographs_taken_of_Fremont_Solstice_parade_on_2015-06-20

Category:Photographs_taken_of_Fremont_Solstice_parade_on_2015-06-20 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ghouston (talk) 04:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

poached eggs (File:Verlorene eier süß sauer.jpg)

Thanks for your translation :-) When you change this file that much, you have to cook this meal at home. Although it doesn't look like, it's tasty. Greetings from Germany --Z ^thomas 09:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll give it a try. I've found recipes on the web. Acabashi (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Please cleanup Coordinates

Hi Acabashi, could you please remove one of the coordinates from the photos in this category: Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags? Thanks, --Arnd (talk) 08:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Done... Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 12:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

New categories

Hi Acabashi. When you create a new category, categorize it properly to all corresponding categories. If e.g. Category:Curves (road) in Hungary is categorized under none Hungarian category, it's simply a serious error. I think, it's not so difficult to understand - if the category name combines two (or three) criteria, the category needs to by categorized by all of them. --ŠJů (talk) 16:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing out my very rare oversight in such 'polite' language. It is a pleasure to hear from such a generous and understanding person as yourself. Your immensly considerate conduct is a credit to the project. Acabashi (talk) 18:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Bad file name?

How is File:20th OEMF - Alex Vittum of Ton Trio 01A (14515899756).jpg considered a bad file name? - Jmabel ! talk 06:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Ditto File:AlanHull1991.jpg? Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

I admit the first one... removed and apologies. The AlanHull1991 would be unsearchable as it's just a string of letters and numbers. Search engines, use a succession of separated words and numbers to understand what we might be looking for. We could leave it as it is, but the file would be/is all but invisible. I hazard that Google images provides for 90%-ish of any particular search that might reveal WikiCommons files. Also, it's always unlikely that anyone who is uninitiated and requiring a file would choose to search through Wikicommons' own cat labyrinth at the bottom of any file just to perhaps come across a person that they might be looking for. I add these to the various bad file cats so they are at hand particularly for me... as you might see, I tend to work through and correct them too. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 11:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

According to Criterion 1, this file would not be eligible for renaming. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Google would find the Alan Hull one on the description text. While running words together like this isn't ideal, it's allowed.

@Rodhullandemu: Interesting coincidence to run across this, I was a big fan of Lindisfarne in the 1970s. - Jmabel ! talk 14:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

@Rodhullandemu: Fair enough... accepted. There is a visibility hierarchy in browser image search, for example we see this in YouTube. The top latch-on is the file name (particularly the first few separated words) which would tend to push files towards top of search, second and lesser is any description attached to the file, and thirdly, least important, any tags (we call them cats). So I don't mind leaving those such as 'AlanHull1991' (as an unbroken string of letters and numbers) rather than changing to 'Alan Hull 1991' per Criterion #2, but it will make our files less easy to find. In similar circumstance, I might just change the name rather than stack it in a 'bad file name' cat for my future attention, and that of others who have taken in upon themselves to improve Commons' file visibility. Many thanks for your input. Acabashi (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Country photographs of the day

Please feel free to comment and vote on this proposal. Elisfkc (talk) 01:58, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Bures

As there is only 1 Bures in England wouldn't Category:Bures, Essex and Suffolk be better at Category:Bures, England? Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:43, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

@Crouch, Swale: Looking at it again, to what I changed it does seem a bit clumsy, even if the convention is to follow place with county location... let's hope this turns out to be the only 'Bures' in England. As Wikipedia uses 'Bures, England', I think your suggestion to reverse my change is sound and sensible. Thanks for pointing this out. Acabashi (talk) 12:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I have tagged it for deletion, if there was another thing called Bures in England then "Bures, Essex and Suffolk" would seem sensible. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Renaming

Dear Acabashi, concerning this edit [1]. Why does the file need renaming? Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 17:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

You are right. It shouldn't. I fondly believe I don't make many mistakes, so many thanks for pointing this one out. Apologies. Acabashi (talk) 17:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Delete pic

Hi Acabashi,

Can you please delete

File:Signature 2.jpg

Signature 2

this file . Am new member in Wikimedia commons. Unfortunately in my mistake , am input double delete tag . This pic is personal , by mistake am uploaded this pic . So please delete this . --Shantanu Arora (talk) 13:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately I can't do that... it requires an administrator. I'm sure that as you as the author have made this request, it will be done. Many thanks. Acabashi (talk) 13:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Am also interested the delete tag , but 2nd time am interested this tag . So I hope this pic will delete . Thank u so much --Shantanu Arora (talk) 13:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Done Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much Rodhullandemu . --Shantanu Arora (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Unused personal files

Please do not nominate for deletion files from this category. I will nominate for deletion this files in future in one click. /St1995 15:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

@Stas1995: Point taken and apologies as you are dealing with this. Acabashi (talk) 15:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:'Ferret and dartboard' 1956 British Railways logo Epping Ongar Railway Essex England.jpg

And also:

File:'Ferret and dartboard' 1956 British Railways logo Epping-Ongar-Railway Essex England.jpg

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:49, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

File:521792 406382672782834 1565877809 n.jpg

File:521792 406382672782834 1565877809 n.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ 02:53, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Fire insurance plaques

I'm looking for a good image of a Sun Fire Office insurance sign as most are quite small or very poor angles being older Geograph images. It's for an article on Charles Povey. Can you help? Ww2censor (talk) 10:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

@Ww2censor: Be glad to help. After looking around I see you are right... there is nothing of quality. We would have to find something on a wall, or publicly viewable and allowable for photography in a museum. There are a lot of reproductions around which would not be suitable. If we can find one in my more usual stamping ground: London, particularly north of the river, West Essex or Hertfordshire, I will make a special journey. Best. Acabashi (talk) 19:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. Unfortunately now that my son has moved from London back to Ireland, I hardly ever visit London but even then would need to find one even though I lived there for 5 years when I was in college. As you live in the general area you have a far better chance of finding one. I have a friend in Dublin who had a nice collection and think he even had a Sun Fire Office plaque but he sold them many years ago. I've had this Charles Povey draft hanging around for quite a while but little time devote to research it. He started the Sun Fire Office. Ping me if you find something. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 21:46, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

I found a Flickr group that includes some freely licenced images and some have the locations mentioned. There was a multiple image from which I have cropped File:Sun Fire Office insurance mark (cropped).jpg which is not too bad if I can get rid of the background. Ww2censor (talk) 22:06, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Shouldn't be too difficult to get rid of background with Photoshop magic wand and a little bit of healing brush on the string. Acabashi (talk) 20:29, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

FYI

Files are added automatically to this category by placing the template {{low quality}} on their description pages. Do not add files to this category manually!
Maintenance: Search for misplaced files using PetScan (will not work on categories shared by many templates).

--Iwata Nakazawa (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Careful cleanup

Hi Acabashi , thank you for the cleanup works you did with Panoramio photos. But please be more careful to not destroy the information template. I needed to repair them.[2] --Arnd (talk) 07:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

This year is a world event.
The upload phase in many European countries ends on November 30th.
Here you can find more details in many languages.

This is a manually inserted message for the uploaders of the 2015 edition.

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

sorry for your wrist. Maybe you know already, but I am informing all previous up-loaders consistently. There is a good chance that a botanist-photographer will be in the second-level international jury that evaluate the files from countries like UK, so images of wild flora and fauna are welcome and will be appreciated (if their description is scientific, of course).--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

"Remove over-categorization" ?

How on earth are images like these over-categorised? [3] [4] Are you suggesting that an image of the National Maritime Museum shouldn't be in Category:National Maritime Museum, London, and that an image of either of the Geenwich Footway Tunnel entrance building shouldn't be in Category:Greenwich foot tunnel? Exactly what categories do you think they are in, or should be in instead? -- KTC (talk) 07:57, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

You are right. My mistake. I think it might be an over-reliance on 'Cat-a-lots' over-categorization tool, which is usually reliable, or might be a bad click select of mine from those offered by the tool. Thanks for picking this up and reverting. Acabashi (talk) 10:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Think cat-a-lots isn't handling it well because of all the hidden categories, from WLM, with location, with maps etc. No worries. -- KTC (talk) 13:04, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:K Lenore Siner Bio.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:K Lenore Siner Bio.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:K Lenore Siner Bio.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Not down to me, I just trimmed off the watermark. Go for it :) Acabashi (talk) 21:48, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Religious buildings vs churches

Good time of the day,

You moved the picture Ruhpolding, Wasen, Kapelle, 1.jpeg‎ from Category:Square photos of religious buildings to Category:Square photos of churches). English was not spoken to me in my cradle, and I cannot say whether a chapel is a (subcategory of) a church. Other categories, such as Religious buildings in Martinique, suggest that churches and chapels should be parallel subcategories of religious buildings. What do you think?

Best regards, -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

In English (I don't know about other cultures but I think it fairly typical), chapels are either separate religious buildings of lower rank to churches, or are parts within a church that are set aside for worship of a particular religious figure or for the remembrance of a high-ranking local family, therefore part of 'churches'. So there is a bit of confusion here in these cats. Given that there isn't a separate cat for chapels under 'square photos' (as separate buildings) it might be OK to put chapels under churches (as small churches). However, I am not dogmatic about this, and if you want to revert I have no objection. Or better, as you suggest, we can have a separate category here for 'Square photos of chapels', and put it under under a larger category of 'Square photos of Christian religious buildings' and add 'Square photos of churches' under there too. I'll leave it up to you. Many thanks. Acabashi (talk) 22:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I see. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 22:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Concerns over crops of Geograph images

Hi. I notice you've been overwriting some Geograph images with cropped versions. In general this is a good idea, but I'm a little concerned that in some cases this makes some {{Derived from}} templates a bit silly. For instance, File:Beach at Port Charlotte, Islay - geograph.org.uk - 24076.jpg is labelled as having a derivative, File:Beach at Port Charlotte, Islay - geograph.org.uk - 24076 (cropped).jpg, but that one is now actually bigger than the "original". I think in cases like this, it might be better to upload your cropped images under a different name. --bjh21 (talk) 09:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Edit summary

Is that a selfie? Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 13:30, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

I believe that it is, and this user's contributions here and on Wikipedia are pure self-promo... rationale here: [5]. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 13:33, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Cricketers_of_Nepal

Category:Cricketers_of_Nepal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 18:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:A ribbon of a road (5867846606).jpg

And also:

File:Racing against time (5866070527) (cropped).jpg Materialscientist (talk) 23:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili

Gentile Acabashi, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Recent Australian images

Fæ started uploading about 45,000 images from an Australian Flickr user Sheba Also and I see you have been cropping some of them. It would be great if you could also add at least one suitable category to each one at the same time. Thanks in advance.

Fæ ha iniziato a caricare circa 45.000 immagini da un utente australiano di Flickr Sheba Also e vedo che ne hai ritagliato alcune. Sarebbe bello se potessi anche aggiungere almeno una categoria adatta a ciascuno nello stesso momento. Si prega di scusare la traduzione di Google. Grazie in anticipo. Ww2censor (talk) 22:30, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

For quite a few of them I have been doing this with cat-a-lot... useful although not obligatory. Thanks. Acabashi (talk)

Category:Dappled light and shadow by country

Is there a reason you removed the metacat template from this category? It is clearly a metacat because the subcategories are for separate countries and the category has "by country" in its name. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

No reason at all I'm afraid. I reverted my edit. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 21:47, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Morrell Roding, Chapman and Andre map, 1777.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Category:Bubble Car Museum, Langriville

Hello Acabashi. You moved Category:Bubble Car Museum Langrick to Category:Bubble Car Museum, Langriville. Why? I found only Langrick at google and the website. --Buch-t (talk) 18:15, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi. The Bubblecar Museum, at PE22 7AW, may for its address put its location at Langrick, but we can't always rely on what businesses/organizations would like as their place location. Presumably the County and District councils know where the borders to settlements are as they are the ones who put up settlement entrance road signs, with no doubt a bit of leeway of a few yards. The entrance sign for Langrick is just north from Langrick church outside Farm Seeds, at PE22 7AN, as can be seen in Streetview. If the museum was just a little outside it might be OK to include it, but it is a mile north from the Langrick village border, which puts it outside any Langriville settlement and into the civil parish.

This link explains what I am saying:

https://gridreferencefinder.com?gr=TF2576450349%7CBubblecar_s_Museum%7C1,TF2613148834%7CLangrick_s_village_s_entrance_s_sign_s_on_s_the_s_B1192_s_road%7C1&v=r

Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 19:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Ok. --Buch-t (talk) 09:54, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Ibaraki douji.jpg

File:Ibaraki douji.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: ja:ファイル:Ibaraki douji.jpg

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Fair enough. When I transferred the file (from, and accepted on English Wikipedia), using 'For The Common Good', I was probably mislead by the EXIF details and the GNU Free Documentation License, which usually gives a reasonable indication of ownership, especially as I noticed that it exists on Japan Wikipedia and is used in an article there. Acabashi (talk) 11:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Cottage garden pink rose bloom at Boreham, Essex, England.jpg

Hi! Are you sure it was rose? When I look at this photo it seems to be rather Paeonia, but I'm not sure. Regards, Salicyna (talk) 12:08, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Do you know, you might be right! Oops. I see that Google image search gives it as a peony. I'll change the file name and description. Thanks for pointing this out. Acabashi (talk) 12:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Bristol

is not in Somerset. It is a county in its own right. Thanks. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:19, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Sorted it. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 13:19, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Side view BU (cropped).jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Side view BU (cropped).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Crop of image sourced to a file since deleted as copyvio BevinKacon (talk) 20:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Fair enough if the original I cropped in good faith was copyvio. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 20:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hatfield Heath Festival 2017 - people by the arena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angela Conner 'Renaissance' water sculpture, Hatfield House, Hertfordshire, England 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:47, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Portland ram at Shipley, West Sussex, England.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shoreham-by-Sea houseboat 'Die Fische' M1096, Riverside Moorings, West Sussex 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo, good quality --Michielverbeek 22:41, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shoreham-by-Sea Riverside Moorings houseboat jetty decking, West Sussex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:09, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Liberty Morris with 'molly' at Broadstairs Folk Week 2017, Kent, England 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Great! --Podzemnik 19:58, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shoreham-by-Sea houseboat, Riverside Moorings, West Sussex 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 19:15, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shoreham-by-Sea houseboat 'Die Fische' M1096, Riverside Moorings, West Sussex 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge Epping-Ongar-Railway North Weald Essex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:36, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atalanta and Hippomenes in pond at Quex House Birchington Kent England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garden steps in Sundial Garden northeast Hatfield House Hertfordshire England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Nicely sharp. --Podzemnik

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumental urn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morgan roadster at Easton Lodge Gardens, Little Easton, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:33, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Drow males quality image beetle

The beetle is Heliotaurus ruficollis Tenebrionidae for me Are you sure of your id? Best regards Notafly (talk) 21:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

You may well be right. They look incredibly similar, and of course the one you mention is found in Spain, and they do seem to like daisies. I'll change it. Many thanks. Acabashi (talk) 00:33, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City of London Cemetery and Crematorium ~ Café patio garden red umbrellas 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 19:07, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garden sundial Hatfield House Hertfordshire England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge pan satyr urn in Pleasure Grounds, Parham House, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge pan satyr urn at the Pleasure Grounds, Parham House, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feeringbury Manor Thakeham Bench Lutyens Bench, Feering Essex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catherine Eddowes grave marker at City of London Cemetery and Crematorium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Yorkshire

Hi, your recents edits imply that these counties are divisions of something called "Yorkshire". True, they roughly correspond to the old ridings within Yorkshire, but are now separate with no relation except a common history. Do you want to reconsider? Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your input, and what you say makes sense and I can't deny is strictly true. I may be totally misguided in this, but I thought it might be easier for people to find these four counties under that heading. If you feel that this is not helpful, and/or just completely wrong, I'll change them back, and stop doing it! Acabashi (talk) 12:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, it's also an issue of consistency that we don't do this anywhere else for the old Yorkshire ridings, and we don't do it in Scotland for things like East Ayrshire and North Ayrshire. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:51, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

I'll change it back. Acabashi (talk) 12:52, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chocolate cake and Victoria sponge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:05, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street lamp ornament and gloriette with climbing rose at Boreham, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 'Clematis Viola' in the Walled Garden at Parham House West Sussex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 12:31, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red and white tulip at Myddelton House, Enfield, London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. What a fancy camera you have! --Podzemnik 01:02, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 16:59, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City of London Cemetery and Crematorium - permissive lavatory block.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:21, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Red and white tulip at Myddelton House, Enfield, London.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Piotr Bart (talk) 08:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks for that. Acabashi (talk) 08:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 'Fritillaria imperialis' Rubra Maxima at Feeringbury Manor, Feering Essex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, --Llez 04:52, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cast iron garden chair at Boreham, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:08, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steel stringed acoustic mandolin at Broadstairs Folk Week 2017, Kent, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michael Fentiman theatre director, photographed at Rhodes Arts Centre, Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:31, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Child sculpture Walled Garden, Parham House, West Sussex, England 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:13, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iron wheel as beer garden ornament at Ashfold Crossways, in Lower Beeding, West Sussex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:10, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shoreham-by-Sea houseboat 'Rebus Stone', Riverside Moorings, West Sussex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pond dipping at Woods Mill, Sussex Wildlife Trust, England 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 'Fritillaria imperialis' Maximea Lutea at Feeringbury Manor, Feering Essex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, --Llez 04:52, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 09:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bench in the Old Palace Garden Hatfield House Hertfordshire England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:27, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 09:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Army engine East Kent Railway Shepherdswell Kent England 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support null --MB-one 09:19, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Good Easter, Essex, England - sheep on road to ford over River Can west of Good Easter village 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:04, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 06:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epping Forest High Beach Essex England - spring pond 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 06:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ham baguette at Black Horse Inn, Nuthurst, West Sussex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good for me. --Rbrechko 19:32, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium regale, regal lily in Essex, England (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support A good QI --Eatcha 13:04, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animated lion and African buffalo taxidermy Powell-Cotton Museum, Birchington Kent England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:32, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeonium arboreum 'Atropurpureum' and 'Zwartkop' at Myddelton House, Enfield, London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 13:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stuffed badger display at Hatfield Heath Festival 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheese roll at The Original Tea Hut at High Beach, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Do you have a bigger size? It's so small for such an easy-to-take photo --Podzemnik 02:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Yes, it's only 1,500 × 1,500 pixels (2.25mp) I'll see if I can dig it out from my hard drive. Acabashi 11:29, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
I had a look at the original from which it was cropped, and all the processing I went through. It seems I had to stand back far enough to get it in focus with the shortest 24mm FL available, which then included much of a car bonnet, which wouldn't be interesting enough to include. Many thanks for your query. Acabashi 13:02, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
This photo is good enough to be a QI. Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 08.05.2016 Charles Burrell & Sons traction engine Horsham West Sussex England 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Onopordum acanthium in cottage garden at Boreham, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wildebeest gnu taxidermy, at Lower Beeding, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance to the Walled Garden greenhouse of Parham House, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City of London Cemetery and Crematorium - permissive lavatory block urinals.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baggage cases luggage trunks Epping-Ongar-Railway North Weald Essex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Main subject is good, but I would crop out the distorted and out of focus edge of the platform --MB-one 09:19, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Good enough for me to be a quality image. -- Johann Jaritz 06:44, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epping Forest High Beach Essex England - spring pond 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 17:53, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross Church from Walled Garden of Goodnestone Park Kent England 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 17:03, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City of London Cemetery and Crematorium ~ Café patio garden red umbrella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 09:16, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Mary the Virgin, Eastry, Kent - tower at west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Thanks --Moroder 13:44, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1950 Ford V8-Pilot 3.6L at Capel Manor, Enfield, London, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Broadstairs Folk Week Pavilion Gardens conversation, Broadstairs, Kent, England 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Impatiens niamniamensis Congo cockatoo at Myddelton House, Enfield, London, England 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:44, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lawn roller at Easton Lodge Gardens, Little Easton, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Websteralive 17:00, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apricots Oranges and Saturn Peaches at Broadstairs Kent England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epping Forest High Beach Waltham Abbey Essex England - oak tree trunks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A wall with pink rose, Fox Road, Mashbury, Essex, England 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 21:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Good Easter, Essex, England - sheep on road to ford over River Can west of Good Easter village 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality ! --MirandaAdramin 14:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Full English breakfast at the Chalet Cafe, Cowfold, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment - Possible FP? Hard to predict, but I'd vote for it at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 06:25, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Plate of chips at the Chalet Cafe, Cowfold, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Piotr Bart (talk) 14:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks. Acabashi (talk) 14:34, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feering Essex - pond and lane at Skye Green hamlet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Braided wattle hurdle fence ivy at Riverside Moorings, Shoreham, West Sussex, England 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1934 Riley Kestrel 1100 Saloon at Capel Manor, Enfield, London, England 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pink climbing rose and trellis at Boreham, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me. --Rbrechko 15:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City of London Cemetery and Crematorium - Anglican Chapel ~ southwest tower door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you brighten it a bit? --Poco a poco 11:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I'll give it a go when I have a moment, but I'll upload this one again as a separate file as I like its moody mystery. Thanks. Acabashi 13:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for advising a change. Brightened, increased HDR, and uploaded as larger file. Didn't want to go too far and blow out the highlights. Acabashi 14:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:12, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Mary the Virgin, Woodnesborough, Kent - churchyard table tombs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheeseboard platter at Black Horse Inn, Nuthurst, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 19:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crumble and ice cream at Black Horse Inn, Nuthurst, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 19:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eton mess at Black Horse Inn, Nuthurst West Sussex England 2 slightly different focus point.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 19:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment Many thanks for nominating this one, one of two versions. I had difficulty getting a focus to the full depth of the fruit heap in both versions, so the top is out of focus. Others could well think this is a problem. I have to leave to them, but I felt in all fairness that I had to point this out. --Acabashi 19:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banana, ice cream and toffee sauce on waffle at The Queen's Head, Boreham, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 19:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egg beans gammon and chips at Stable Yard Hatfield House Hertfordshire England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Great categorization. exciting. --Trougnouf 20:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1938 Daisy Greville, Countess of Warwick monument Church of St Mary Little Easton Essex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 17:31, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheese salad roll at The Original Tea Hut at High Beach, Essex, England 02 higher dynamic range.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 13:24, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Alban the Martyr's Church, Coopersale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 13:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plate of chips at the Chalet Cafe, Cowfold, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:11, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeonium arboreum 'Atropurpureum' at Myddelton House, Enfield, London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 12:54, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Access to walled garden at Parham House, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:37, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 'Alcea rosea' Halo Series Hollyhock Cerise Henham Essex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 19:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apple tree and red hot poker at Boreham, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City of London Cemetery and Crematorium - Anglican Chapel ~ west twin light window in dappled light.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:17, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milk loaf with wheatgerm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Battered whitebait at the White Hart Inn, Moreton, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 09:03, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beefburger - A114 Whips Cross Road café hut - Waltham Forest London England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A roast lamb dinner at Black Horse Inn, Nuthurst West Sussex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sharp enough and looks yummy, but the verticals on the right are leaning out --MB-one 08:56, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Those verticals cannot be corrected meaningful and are unavoidable in such a shot. Somewhat low DOF, but surprisingly good lighting, nice colours. I cannot see severe issues. --Smial 09:33, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 'Berfrestone' (DB) door and tympanum arch St Nicholas Church Barfrestone Kent England 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:09, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:05, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roast topside of beef.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow and pink lilies at Boreham, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balustraded pond Capel Manor College Gardens Enfield London England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 13:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agricultural harvester trailer at Horsham West Sussex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 13:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Painted tractor at Colgate West Sussex England 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 13:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rusty piano frame at Riverside Moorings, West Sussex, England 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A brunch at Capel Manor College Gardens Enfield London England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some color noise and purple fringes on the sharp edges --MB-one 08:59, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
You are right. Not all the colour noise removed or converted to grain, and the purple fringes unacceptable. If I get time I'll have another go at it. I also think it's a tad washed out. Thanks. Acabashi 10:14, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment I've given it another go, and removed artifacts and purple fringing. I also increased the dynamic range to get more detail in the highlights. Thanks for the advice. Acabashi 16:12, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Essex farm wagon 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZSU 23-4 "Shilka" mobile anti-aircraft vehicle - Museum of Army Flying, Hampshire, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:40, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caterpillar track military vehicle Kelvedon Hatch Nuclear Bunker, Essex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Holy Cross Felsted Essex England - Richard and Robert Rich, Barons Rich monument - detail 04 vertical correction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, crop at the left acceptable for QI --Michielverbeek 12:20, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Mary the Virgin, Eastry, Kent - tower upper stages at west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jeep in Easton Lodge Gardens, Little Easton, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:42, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hand pump ornament at Boreham, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 'Lion Gate' to the Walled Garden of Parham House, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Full resolution would be nice --Podzemnik 22:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
I'll try to dig it out and do this. I uploaded a lot at this res because of previous slow speed taking ages to upload. Acabashi 11:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Picket fence hemp rope at Riverside Moorings, Shoreham, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 19:01, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Globe artichoke Cynara cardunculus at Riverside Moorings, Shoreham, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 19:00, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cranberry sauce at Green Man pub, Takeley Street, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheeseburger with onions at Hatfield Heath Festival 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 12:47, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1972 Jaguar E-Type Series 3 Coupe at Capel Manor, Enfield, London, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 09:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Dry Garden at RHS Garden Hyde Hall, Essex, England - border planting.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cedar lawn south front Quex House Birchington Kent England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically OK, although I will give you a hint for improvement: always try to make the composition in such a way that the subject is clear. In this case, if the tree is the subject, get more of the tree in the shot. --Peulle 07:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Folk singer with war bonnet at Broadstairs Folk Week 2017, Kent, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Annoying element at the bottom in foreground, unfortunately if you get rid of it the crop will look awkward --Poco a poco 11:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC) @Poco a poco: I've played with a 5:4 crop which does take out the bottom blurry element, and some of the guitar and hand, but does also make the obvious focal point of the head more prominent and takes away much of the blur at each side. Do you think I should try that, or is it a lost cause? Many thanks for your constructive comment. Acabashi 13:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment Went back to the beginning with this one. Cropped to remove blurred elements. Removed yellow cast. Improved detail and whites. Upload larger file. Acabashi 16:44, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Good but it needs a slight perspective correction (or rotation), make sure the vertical lines are vertical --Trougnouf 09:28, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
As suspected, the cropped hand is an issue, I am not convinced that this (with the tilt fixed) is a QI, we should go for CR --Poco a poco 10:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Yann 14:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 'Anas hybrid' Mallard at Henham Essex England 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 14:32, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Aldnonymous 14:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bacon butty and mug of tea at Copsale Hall, Nuthurst, West Sussex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 14:32, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Persicaria microcephala 'Red Dragon' at RHS Garden Hyde Hall, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 14:32, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 'Berfrestone' (DB) door and arch St Nicholas Church Barfrestone Kent England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:24, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Braided wattle hurdle fence ivy at Riverside Moorings, Shoreham, West Sussex, England 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 15:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

File:20180503 Church St. John of God in Spišské Podhradie 2925 DxO.jpg

Hi, I have updated the picture according to your comment. Could you please check on QIC page? -- Jakubhal 05:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garden produce sale cart at Myddelton House, Enfield, London, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:32, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bus Routemaster Epping-Ongar-Railway North Weald Station Essex England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:32, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airstream caravan at Easole Street, Nonington, Kent, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:32, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vanden Plas Princess at Capel Manor, Enfield, London, England 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 13:09, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Liberty Morris 'molly' (Pete) at 2017 Broadstairs Folk Week, Kent, England 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1985 Land Rover 2495cc at Hatfield Heath Festival 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:01, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A garden path and lawn Gibberd Garden Essex England.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Very pretty, good light handling, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 18:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Summer house in Nuthurst village, West Sussex, England 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:43, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St Mary the Virgin, Eastry, Kent - churchyard listed north gate and wall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. I would lower the contrast a little bit but this is a matter of taste. --Aristeas 12:55, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! "Rudbeckia hirta" Black-eyed Susan Gibberd Garden Essex England (cropped).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:39, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A roast lamb Sunday dinner at The Black Bull, Fyfield, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pink rose bloom of a climbing rose at Boreham, Essex, England 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 12:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shelley Pavilion, Easton Lodge Gardens, Little Easton, Essex, England side view 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 12:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1992 Mini Mark VI 1275cc engine bay at Hatfield Heath Festival 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:08, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shoreham-by-Sea houseboat, Riverside Moorings, West Sussex 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 13:38, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loughton Cricket Club ground scoreboard at Loughton, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:13, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunday roast vegetable side dish at The Stag, Little Easton, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:12, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loughton Cricket Club cricket pitch rollers, at Loughton, Essex, England 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:10, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulipa saxatilis 'Lilac Wonder' at RHS Garden Hyde Hall, Dry Garden - Essex, England 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 16:07, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Вікі любить Землю 2019 в Україні триває до 31 травня!

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня триває сьомий конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» (Wiki Loves Earth), метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Протягом травня ви можете завантажувати власні фото природно-заповідного фонду України та змагатися за призи. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Цього року є деякі зміни в правилах, зокрема:

фотографії пам'яток, які на момент початку конкурсу не мали жодної ілюстрації на Вікісховищі або у Вікіпедії, отримують коефіцієнт 10 в кількісній номінації. Якщо ви маєте фото ще не проілюстрованих пам'яток — це збільшить ваші шанси на перемогу;
окрема спецномінація для аерофотозйомки (фото з дронів тощо).

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте на сайті конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlewikimedia.org.ua – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in English). 22:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trained rose and shrub rose against brick wall in Boreham, Essex, England.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It seems to have been reduced in size - do you have a full-size version? Also, the highlights are a bit bright.--Peulle 12:44, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
I'll have a look at the original when I have time. Thanks. --Acabashi 20:36, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Done Increased file size from the original and increased dynamic range. Acabashi 12:40, 6 May 2019 (UTC) Support OK.--Peulle 08:41, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

30 July 2019

Hi Acabashi, on your piture: File:City of London Cemetery Terrapin pond 05.jpg is not "Emys orbicuraris" to be seen, which is no Terrapin, but "Trachemys scripta elegans". Cheers 5snake5 (talk) 08:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Acabashi, on your picture: File:City of London Cemetery Terrapin pond 05.jpg is not "Emys orbicuraris" to be seen, which is no Terrapin, but "Trachemys scripta elegans". Cheers 5snake5 (talk) 08:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for that... changed. Acabashi (talk) 12:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2019 в Україні

Привіт!

1 вересня вже традиційно стартує українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До кінця вересня Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше про те, як взяти участь, можна прочитати за посиланням.

Із детальними правилами можна ознайомитися тут. Для тих, хто раніше уже брав участь у конкурсі — зауважте, що цього року є певні зміни:

у номінації «Найкраще фото» — файли повинні мати не менше 4 МПкс;
у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» — оцінка фотографії пам'ятки складається із суми базового та додаткових балів (в останній враховується чи ця пам'ятка вже фотографувалася іншими авторами та скільки фотографій пам'яток уже є з цього населеного пункту);

Нагадаємо, що фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Також цього року маємо спецномінації «Єврейська спадщина» та «Млини». Також окремо відзначатимуться найкращі відео із пам'ятками.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна».

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!

English | Italiano | +/−

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

File:A country singer in Epping Forest, Essex, England.jpg

File:A country singer in Epping Forest, Essex, England.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Broichmore (talk) 14:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:Reportedly_haunted_locations_in_the_United_Kingdom

Reportedly haunted locations in the United Kingdom has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Horse and Jockey village railway station, County Tipperary, Republic of Ireland.jpg

Unfortunately photographs appear to be in Copyright. Yours sincerely, Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2019

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. There is also an international upload category with no national prize.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in the national categories even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate such files at next step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--20:45, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Cricket reversions

About this reversion of my edit, could you explain where is the "art rendering" on this? The image only depicts photos of cricket players in a sort of collage, not showing any form of "art" (paintings, sculpture, illustration).

In the other reversion, (this), postcards are not pieces of art themselves so some postcards depict illustrations and other, only photos. Therefore I created the Category:Illustrations of cricket to place postcards that are specifically illustrations.

As far as I know, reverting is rude when the edit is not a vandalism. So please, before reverting compulsively, take a look at the changes first and, I you disagree, you can leave a feedback on my talkpage and discuss the matter. I don't see any valid reason to revoke the edits, as you have done. - Fma12 (talk) 14:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Aboriginal cricket

Hi, About the File:Australian Aboriginal cricket team in England 1868.jpg, if the photo was taken in the UK, the correct license tags are {{PD-UK-unknown}} and {{PD-1923}}.

PD-old only applies when the author is disclosed (not in this case). I'll also working on restoring the photo so it has some scratches in the middle. Photoshop is useful in this occasions. Thanks for your feedback. Fma12 (talk) 22:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

No probs in changing the the licence if you feel necessary. You could inform the uploader, however your proposed change is uncontroversial so not really necessary. I thought of repairing the pic, but as it's only 473 KB it could reduce further its already low quality. A lossless import/export for Photoshop healing brush could help. I use DXO Photolab repair tool which is easier and better at this kind of thing. It's probably best to upload a separate repaired version rather than overwriting... but then you probably already know this. Cheers. Acabashi (talk) 12:13, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Hello John welcome back to Chinatown-1 (11860507265).jpg

File:Hello John welcome back to Chinatown-1 (11860507265).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ies (talk) 09:09, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

I just cropped the border off this one. I'm fairly neutral as to the photo's value, so I don't mind if it goes or stays. Acabashi (talk) 10:43, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Un grazie per WLM e un libro sulla conoscenza libera per te

Wikimedia Italia

Gentile Acabashi,

oggi ti scrivo a nome dell'associazione Wikimedia Italia per ringraziarti di aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. Il tuo contributo è particolarmente apprezzato perché le tue foto sono usate in 5 o più voci di Wikipedia o altro progetto Wikimedia.

Come piccolo omaggio avremmo piacere di spedirti una copia (tutta in carta riciclata) del libro di Carlo Piana, Open source, software libero e altre libertà. Fornisci un recapito per ricevere una copia del libro.

Il libro comprende anche un capitolo sul tuo lavoro! Si parla infatti di libertà di panorama, cioè la libertà di fare e diffondere foto come le tue, ma tutto l'anno e su tutti i monumenti d'Italia. Finché resta la legge attuale, per aumentare le foto caricabili puoi chiedere a un ente vicino a te di aderire a Wiki Loves Monuments. Speriamo che questo libro ti sia utile per apprezzare quanto hai fatto e per trasmettere la passione della conoscenza libera a una persona a te vicina.

Se desideri una copia ma non puoi fornirci un indirizzo a cui spedirla, contatta la segreteria Wikimedia Italia e troviamo una soluzione insieme.

Grazie ancora e a presto,

Lorenzo Losa (msg) 10:29, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Page moves

Hi, can you please explain your page moves for File:Ateez 'Treasure EP FIN - All to Action' showcase.webm and File:Ateez 'Treasure EP FIN - All to Action' showcase video still.jpg? Your actions are not supported by either the language policy or the file renaming guideline. Contrary to your edit summary, there is no obligation for file names to be in English. Ə XPLICIT 00:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I thought there was, or at least should have the courtesy of a translation... however, thank you for pointing that out, and the links. Perhaps you might like to provide an adequate description translation so that the file might be more readily accessible to and understood by the majority of people, after all, English is the language most understood by the majority of the world's population, I suppose that's why we have categories written in English rather than any other of the myriad world languages. But bear in mind that the vast majority pick up our files through a Google search—whose algorithms it is said use the file name for about 75% of the search hook, and the rest, the description—not through direct go-to to Wikimedia, which is, I'm sure you know, by far the least well-known repository of images, despite our fondness for it. I have no objection to you returning the file name to it's original—which you can do as you are an administrator—so that it again becomes undecipherable for the vast majority of people. Many thanks for your input. Acabashi (talk) 08:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

2001 Nine logo

Hello, my name is Niko. I'm just want to talk to you. Can you rename File:Nine1970.svg to "File:Nine2001.svg"?

Because those logo is from 2001, not 1970s. •(Do you wanna talk to me?) 13:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Done. Acabashi (talk) 14:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

1970 Nine logo

Thank you to renaming File name of 2001 Nine Network logo.

I have another request for you, would you like to rename "File:Nine (1970).svg" to "Nine1970.svg"?

•(Do you wanna talk to me?) 16:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Doesn't seem to want to do that... suggest using the request change template per the previous one, or getting an administrator to fix it for you. It may be because the file name was previously changed. Acabashi (talk) 16:44, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Rosa hemisphaerica (sulphur rose)

Hi Acabashi, you moved File:Rosa hemisphaerica (sulphur rose) 01.jpg and File:Rosa hemisphaerica (sulphur rose) 02.jpg from Category:Yellow roses to Category:Unidentified yellow Rosa cultivars. May I ask you why, because the name of the rose is known (R. hemisphaerica). Wilrooij (talk) 19:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, my fault. Thanks Wilrooij (talk) 06:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2020 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Ukraine

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. З найважливіших змін цього року:

у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» — збільшився додатковий бал за фотографії пам'яток (якщо світлин пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено, то можна отримати 21 бал.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року теж є спецномінації «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини» та «Відео». Також є спеціальна номінація від проєкту «Via Regia Ukraine» — у ній автоматично беруть участь світлини всіх пам’яток міст України, через які пролягає Via Regia — Дубно, Рівне, Острог, Львів, Броди, Городок (Львівська область), Луцьк, Володимир-Волинський, Радомишль, Житомир та Київ. Цього року у Завантажувачі не передбачено окремих параметрів для спецномінацій — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 06:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2020 в Україні: залишилося два тижні! / Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Ukraine: two weeks are left!

Привіт!

Українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» триватиме ще два тижні, до 30 вересня!

За перші два тижні учасники завантажили понад 16 тисяч фото українських пам’яток. Це поки найбільший результат серед усіх 29 країн, які цьогоріч організовують конкурс. Свої роботи на українську частину конкурсу вже подали 239 авторів, половина із них вперше долучилися до змагання. На знімках представлені пам’ятки з усіх регіонів України. Загалом сфотографовано 5568 об’єктів із конкурсних списків.

Найменш представленими поки є Луганська (69 фото 45 об’єктів) і Херсонська (81 фото 38 об’єктів) області та місто Севастополь (136 фото 39 об’єктів). Якщо у вас (чи у ваших друзів та знайомих) є світлини з цих регіонів — без вагань долучайтеся до фотозмагання!

У рамках спеціальної номінації «Єврейська спадщина» завантажено понад 650 світлин 126 пам'яток, з яких знімки 42 — завантажено вперше. Якщо ваш населений пункт має об'єкти єврейської культурної спадщини, але їх нема у списках, напишіть нам, щоб ми їх додали до списків!

Спеціальна номінація «Млини» — понад 640 фото 144 об'єктів, знімки 44 — завантажено вперше. Загалом база млинів зараз нараховує понад 615 об'єктів, і вона постійно доповнюється.

Вперше цього року ми втілюємо спеціальну номінацію від проєкту «Via Regia Ukraine» — на жаль, ще зовсім нема світлин із Бродів та Радомишля. І з Житомира є тільки 7 світлин, а з міста Рівного — 8 фото.

У спеціальній номінації «Відео» — понад 20 робіт.

Попереду ще два тижні конкурсу. Встигніть долучитися самі та запрошуйте друзів.

Чекаємо на ваші роботи!

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться тут: wlm.photo. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки»

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки» раніше чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цього конкурсу).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here. 22:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Basilique Notre Dame de Yamoussokro 02.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Not my pictures. Acabashi (talk) 16:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Red and white tulip at Myddelton House, Enfield, London.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Home 07-03-~2 (2).JPG

File:Home 07-03-~2 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

• I only cropped the thing, but its delete nom. seems fine to me. Acabashi (talk) 17:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:The Vice President, Shri Bhairon Singh Shekhawat inaugurates the 'Match of Parliamentarians Cricket Team' by taking a stance at the pitch, in New Delhi on December 11, 2004 (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

• I only cropped the thing, so if its nomination is sound, this is fine by me. Acabashi (talk) 11:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Good evening! My english is not very good so I will talk to you in German! Guten Abend. Was soll diese Veränderung? Alle bisherigen Jahre waren ohne of, warum soll man es unnötig kompliziert machen? Bitte machen Sie diese Änderung rückgängig! Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Geoprofi Lars (talk) 15:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Buddha Dordenmo.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

I just cropped out the watermark. If the file fails for some reason, so be it. Acabashi (talk) 12:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India

Hi Acabashi, Hope you are doing well. I sent you email about the Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India jury. Could you please confirm if you have received the mail or not? Regards--Atudu (talk) 11:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Apologies for not getting back... I've been off the project for a few days. I did receive your email, thanks. Unfortunately I don't live in, and haven't uploaded any pics of India. So this is probably not pertinent to me. Thanks anyway. Acabashi (talk) 15:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)̴̴

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A roast beef dinner at The Queen's Head, Boreham, Essex, England - lighter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Another very good food photograph, but a few overlapping categories. -- Ikan Kekek 04:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Fixed --Tomer T 08:51, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 17:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Kalki Koechlin in Sari.jpg

Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 19:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Eduardo Torre Cantalapiedra y Meneses Monroy (de izquierda a derecha) optimized.jpg

File:Eduardo Torre Cantalapiedra y Meneses Monroy (de izquierda a derecha) optimized.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. Wikimedia Commons doesn't permit uploading personal files unless you are using them for personal use or an educational purpose.

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Born2bgratis.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 11:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Not my file. I only optimized it to improve a low quality image before it was prodded for deletion. Acabashi (talk) 08:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.

Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:27, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30

Переможці спеціальної номінації «Відео» 2020. Автори роликів: Ігор Мартинів, Кирило Венцеславський; Музика: Erik Satie: Gymnopedie No 2 by Kevin MacLeod. Монтаж: Atoly. Ліцензія CC BY-SA 4.0

Привіт!

Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!

Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:

Проміжна статистика
Регіон	К-ть пам'яток	К-ть фото
Севастополь	1	1
АР Крим	12	51
Закарпаття	26	96
Миколаївщина	29	81
Рівненщина	36	186
Херсонщина	36	83
Житомирщина	55	324
Донеччина	57	153
Тернопільщина	62	234
Буковина	75	220
Луганщина	82	90
Львівщина	82	351
Кіровоградщина	88	181
Волинь	98	270
Одещина	115	383
Сумщина	129	414
Дніпропетровщина	139	278
Київ	159	248
Хмельниччина	166	538
Полтавщина	171	594
Харківщина	175	625
Київщина	181	651
Черкащина	186	455
Прикарпаття	240	305
Вінничина	242	775
Запоріжжя	253	317
Чернігівщина	305	519

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:

«Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
«Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
«Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:06, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Basilique Notre Dame de Yamoussokro 03.JPG

Yours sincerely, -M.nelson (talk) 18:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

I just removed the watermark. If the image itself requires removal, so be it. Acabashi (talk) 12:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--15:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Puja Gupta with Thor.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Puja Gupta with Thor.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Puja Gupta with Thor.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Afeef (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Якщо це порушення авторських прав, то видалення, звичайно, нормально. Я лише обрізав межі зображення. Acabashi (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Rotary clothes lines

ist wieder da. Grüezi, --Wäschespinne (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Complexe sportif Boganda Bangui - Mapillary (YWNnFth0 wsgw0uUrPYYrg).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:52, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

I only cropped and removed watermark. If this image violates guidelines, then removal is OK with me. ̴Acabashi (talk) 12:43, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:COVID-19_pandemic_in_unidentified_locations_of_England

COVID-19 pandemic in unidentified locations of England has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Categorization I don't follow

Why are File:Church Times Cricket Cup final 2019, Diocese of London v Dioceses of Carlisle, Blackburn and Durham 52.jpg and other similar photos in Category:Outdoor tables? - Jmabel ! talk 02:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Joint team from the three diocese, as described in the description. Acabashi (talk) 12:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Which has what to do with outdoor tables? (Sorry I missed the colon first time around). - Jmabel ! talk 15:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
I suppose the 'outdoor tables' is a parent category to 'picnic tables', but oddly not to 'beer garden tables' which should probably have 'outdoor' as a parent. Even though 'beer' and 'picnic' can be interpreted as 'outdoor', they can be either stand alone tables or with built-in seats depending on the context. However, 'outdoor tables' is probably not appropriate in this case. Acabashi (talk) 16:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Долучіться до опитування — допоможіть визначити, як проводити конкурс «Вікі любить пам’ятки» у 2022 році

Вітаємо! Ви отримуєте це повідомлення, бо брали участь в українській частині міжнародного конкурсу «Вікі любить пам’ятки» у минулі роки. Зараз організаційна команда конкурсу вирішує, як проводити його під час повномасштабної війни в Україні.

Ми розуміємо, що цього року ми не зможемо провести конкурс у звичному форматі — зокрема тому, що фотографування об'єктів в Україні зараз ускладнене міркуваннями безпеки. Однак наша місія із документування української культурної спадщини є як ніколи важливою, тому розглядаємо варіанти, як можна провести конкурс у обмеженому форматі.

Для цього хочемо запитати поради у спільноти конкурсу. Просимо приділити 5—7 хвилин (не пізніше середи, 6 липня), щоби висловити свою думку.

Пройдіть опитування за посиланням

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 17:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Tree trimming at Temple, City of London, England 02.jpg

File:Tree trimming at Temple, City of London, England 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Purani Raghavan (talk) 12:47, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Good luck with that one. Authenticity fully EXIFed, and with detailed description. Please try to understand English... copywriting is to do with sentence structure, grammar and syntax for advertising. Perhaps you should look at your own uploads first, which to me seem a load of blatant steals, before you try a lame cheap shot back. Have a good day. Acabashi (talk) 14:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine

Привіт!

Цього року українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» пройде з 1 по 31 жовтня — через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: тільки світлини зроблені до 23 лютого 2022 року включно будуть прийматися в основній частині конкурсу.

В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже водинадцяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року знову пройде спецномінація «Відео» — для участі робіт у цій спецномінації не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — роботи зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року ми проводимо конкурс вже за чинним адміністративно-територіальним устроєм.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 20:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

5 днів Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні / 5 days of Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine

Привіт!

Українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» вже почалася — за 5 днів фотозмагання Україна вийшла на 12-е місце за кількістю світлин у світі. Не кількістю єдиною, звісно, але гарно було б не надто сильно відстати від російської частини конкурсу, і хоча б потрапити до почесних топ-5.

Цього року вперше у конкурсі є спеціальна номінація «Фотоплівка» — на неї можна подавати скани світлин, зроблених на фотоплівці — мова може йти й про скани самої фотоплівки і скани з віддрукованих знімків із неї. Ця спецномінація покликана мотивувати оцифровувати й ділитися своїми фотоархівами: частина об'єктів уже виглядає дуже відмінно, а частина — більше не існує… Враховуючи сучасну ситуацію із російським вторгненням і можливість потенційної втрати таких фотоархівів, ця спецномінація — актуальна. Врахуйте, що для того, щоб світлина потрапила на спецномінацію, потрібно вибрати відповідне поле у Завантажувачі.

Автори світлин маловідомих пам'яток України зможуть позмагатися за відзнаку від «Україна Інкогніта».

Також уже традиційно пройде спецномінація «Відео» — для участі робіт у цій спецномінації не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — роботи зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук. У нас також є сторінка в інстаграмі та твіттері.

Важливо! Цього року ми проводимо конкурс вже за чинним адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Приймаються тільки ті світлини та відео, які були зняті до 23 лютого 2022 року включно.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікі любить пам'ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Ще 3 дні! Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні триває до 31 жовтня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що ви та ваша родина у безпеці. Нагадуємо, що залишилося три дні до завершення конкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», і якщо у вас є можливість взяти участь у конкурсі цього року — долучайтеся!

Трохи статистики за результатами чотирьох тижнів конкурсу:

завантажено понад 11000 світлин, які зображують майже 3700 об’єктів культурної спадщини;
- з них фотографії 180 пам'яток — вперше подані на конкурс;
понад 500 світлин подано у спецномінації «Фотоплівка»;
вже більше 220 учасників та учасниць;
- з них більше 130 — зареєструвалися вже під час конкурсу.

Найменш представлені регіони — Севастополь (1 фото), Донецька (19), Миколаївська (20), Кіровоградська (58), Крим (72), Херсонська (74) та Луганська (80). Конкурсні списки за регіонами можна переглянути тут: списки пам'яток.

Переглядайте свої фото- та відеоархіви й приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 08:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікі любить пам'ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Category:Taken_with_DJI_FC1102_in_Portugal

Taken with DJI FC1102 in Portugal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

RZuo (talk) 08:09, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Applying categories

I have just been using the category Trees in Essex and observed a dozen pictures of a Cricket match, lots of pictures of earthworks, and many more pictures of churches, which I think mat be all your work. All these are tagged with lots and lots of categories, including "Trees in Essex"

I want to point out here that the reason for the categorisation is NOT to simply describe what is in your picture.

The purpose is encyclopaedic. It is so that a person who is searching for a good picture of an English Oak, or a Tulip Tree or a Deodar Cypress can find one.

One of the pictures that I saw there had trees along the horizon, but not closer, and of no practical use to anyone who searched for "Tree".

So when you categorise a picture as "Tree" then a tree needs to be a significant element within the picture, not simply an element that is a background to men playing cricket. The cricket photos, etc, clog up the main page, and make it difficult to find the trees for the jungle.

So if you are also labelling your pictures "men", "blue sky", and "green grass", then please don't! It is really superfluous!

Label all the pictures with the name of the cricket club, a couple of the BEST pictures with "Cricket in Essex" and also a couple of the most relevant with the name of the village, or estate where the match is taking place. This provides useful links. But they don't all need to be labelled with every possible factor.

The same goes for all the churches..... only label the relevant characteristics. If, for example, you were at Long Melford, then you might have one photo specifically of the clipped yews, which is a useful tree photo.

I hope that this is helpful! Amandajm (talk) 15:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Noël Deparis

Hi. I combined the DRs as they were for the same user with the same reason. In the future you can use COM:MDR to open a deletion request for multiple files at once. Cheers. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Acabashi (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Apologies

I cropped two photos you uploaded (Albion Street blue door and windows and woman with Yorkshire Terrier at Broadstairs Kent England) and uploaded them as new files but just noticed the note about not uploading a modified image without consultation. If you don't like these crops then I can request their deletion. The original uploads still remain, these are just new cropped versions. My apologies for missing this note. Helper201 (talk) 09:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

These look OK to me as they are uploaded as a completely different file. The only problem I would have would be if the original had been overwritten and/or had been photo-edited. Thanks for the heads up. Acabashi (talk) 10:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)