User:Böhringer/Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argynnis-adippe-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Superb. --Iotatau 21:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faschina Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support -- H005 21:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:BallonKathedrale01 edit.jpg, which was nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:BallonKathedrale01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Türkenbund Lilie, Lilium martagon.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Türkenbund Lilie, Lilium martagon.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gämse, Rupicapra rupicapra.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments geiles Bild, ich würd die Schatten etwas aufhellen, aber das ist sicher Geschmackssache --Mbdortmund 22:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beblättertes Läusekraut, Pedicularis foliosa 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Maedin 18:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vorderhopfreben Üntschenspitze 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vorderhopfreben Üntschenspitze 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frümsner Alp Rheintal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colors, good detail, good framing (slight tilt, but can probably be attributed to wide angle perspective distortion) --Ferengi 13:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Holstein Rind 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Indeed a bit dark, but wouldn't call it underexposed. --Ferengi 21:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Bild Ballon Kathedrale

Das Bild ist wirklich wunderschön, habe dieses für einen meiner Blogbeiträge verwendet: http://www.lieinthesound.de/2009/07/free-mixtape-vertraumter-indie-pop-fur-den-sommer/ Liebe Grüße aus Berlin, Brigitte

schön, wenn es dir gefällt --Böhringer (talk) 18:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dryas julia, Fackel Julia Falter 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite shallow DOF and may need a new crop, but still QI. --kallerna 16:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Böhringer!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:40, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Clariden3267m.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
• Image:Auf toten Baumästen5a.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:2008 Sagrada Familia 14.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Auf toten Baumästen6.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Bergrettungsheim Brüggelekopf 1.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Auf toten Baumästen4b.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Auf toten Baumästen2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Auf toten Baumästen3.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Auf toten Baumästen1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Auf toten Baumästen6a.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Auf toten Baumästen4a.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Auf toten Baumästen4.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Auf toten Baumästen5.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Distelfalter, Vanessa cardui AUF Schmetterlingsflieder, Buddleja davidii 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Correct. --ComputerHotline 07:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpen Gelbling, Colias phicomone, Arnica montana 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Correct. --ComputerHotline 07:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagpfauenauge, Inachis io auf Astrantia major, Großer Sterndolde 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Correct. --ComputerHotline 07:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

über einen internetsearch " wilhelm lau, photograph, bregenz, römerstrasse" komme ich zu deiner wikimedia seite. warum suche ich lau ? im zuge der aufarbeitung des nachlasses meiner familie finde ich fotos meiner vermutlich urgrosseltern und würde die gerne zuordnen, habe aber keine namen. mein kontakt: ch.ender@aon.at

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Türkenbund Lilie, Lilium martagon 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wunderschön --Berthold Werner 10:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Hohe Kugel Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great. Abigor 21:06, 1 August 2009 (UTC)  Comment Excellent. Please try FP. --Marcok 21:30, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kleiner Fuchs, Aglais urticae.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kleiner Fuchs, Aglais urticae.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Air Sports Andelsbuch 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not perfectly sharp and some slight CA, but great colours and composition, so still very good quality. -- H005 16:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothorn 2239m Biberacher Hütte, Hochkünzelspitze 2397m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow! (the sky may need some fixing). --Marcok 23:41, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tagpfauenauge, Inachis io auf Astrantia major, Großer Sterndolde 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tagpfauenauge, Inachis io auf Astrantia major, Großer Sterndolde 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Distelfalter, Vanessa cardui AUF Schmetterlingsflieder, Buddleja davidii 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Distelfalter, Vanessa cardui AUF Schmetterlingsflieder, Buddleja davidii 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Oh yes, it's me again. You are making excellent pictures, so they get featured, and then here I am... And I still don't speak german. Sorry... Is it possible to have an English or French description? It would be so nice. --Berru (talk) 19:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Oberfallenberg Dornbirn Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 20:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Schadonapaß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- H005 20:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Hochkünzelspitze 2397m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --kallerna 15:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

A question

Guten tag, Mr. Böhringer; I'm planning on nominating another of your wonderful images, but before I put it up, I was wondering if you could explain what the white area is under the right side of the roof? It doesn't appear on the left side. Yours, Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:41, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

I know it is not, but I could make it dark - should I? --Böhringer (talk) 18:41, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

I can darken it, I was just wondering if it was supposed to be there. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

I think it's no problem - for me it would be ok --Böhringer (talk) 20:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:360° Hohe Kugel Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Hohe Kugel Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Identifying paragliders

Hi. I've started sorting the files in the paragliding category into subcategories, and I noticed that you uploaded a few of theses pictures (Air Sports Andelsbuch). I would also like to change the page "paraglider" to display only identified paraglider wings, but unfortunately I currently only managed to identify 2 wings. Do you by chance know what the models are on your photos ? PiRK (talk) 22:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

SORRY NO --Böhringer (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bürstegg Biberkopf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composition and atmosphere --Mbdortmund 20:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:360° Schadonapaß.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Schadonapaß.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Signatur fehlt

Hallo Herr Böhringer, hier: Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list fehlt Ihre Signatur. Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Alchemist, der Signatur Button hat nicht funktioniert. Hab es händisch nachgetragen. Dnake für die Info --Böhringer (talk) 21:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butzenspitze 2547m Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good result, despite shooting into the light. --Von.grzanka 11:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

FP Nomination

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:Cukrowicz nachbaur Kapelle 1.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cukrowicz nachbaur Kapelle 1.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürrenbach Gletscher 8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent -- H005 21:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Panorama Zitterklapfen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive. --Ferengi 11:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Photographers Blackbelt

		THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
		I hereby award at you this Photographers Blackbelt for your outstanding and excellent pictures. --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:33, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

viiiiiiiiiiiiielen herzlichen Dank! Das freut mich sehr. --Böhringer (talk) 18:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

I love your images, mostly winter images!--21:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleiner Fuchs auf Ellenbogen 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Background is not actually its natural habitat, but photographic quality is very good. -- H005 08:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

your QI nomination

Hello, please take a look at the image's File:Bürstegg Biberkopf.jpg lower right corner. It looks like it should be cut off. Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

vielen Dank Mbz1, ich korrigiere das. :-)) --Böhringer (talk) 21:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wildes Gräshorn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Very good. I just wonder why the drops are falling diagonally??? -- H005 21:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)No idea why--Böhringer 10:19, 3 September 2009 (UTC) Das Bild ist interessant, haste mal nen etwas engeren Beschnitt versucht? --Mbdortmund 13:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC) nein, habe ich nicht - die Tropfen fallen trotzdem schräg ins Bild und ich weiss nicht warum das so ist. :-( --Böhringer 22:09, 5 September 2009 (UTC) Nice work. The crop is ok for me --Cayambe 09:56, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zitterklapfen Gräshorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful --Cayambe 08:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bürstegg Biberkopf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Mbz1 21:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wildes Gräshorn Günes Gräshorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent picture. --NormanB 16:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bürstegg Biberkopf.jpg

Hallo Friedrich, ich hab mir mal erlaubt eine neue Version deines Bildes hochzuladen. Viele Grüße --Simonizer (talk) 06:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

danke erstmal - ist eigentlich schade um das schöne Bild - die Wetterverhältnisse und meine Ausrüstung ließen in diesem Falle nicht mehr zu. Deine Version ist doch besser. Ansonsten "watte" ich im Tiefschnee dorthin und mache ein Winterbild davon. Also Danke nochmal --Böhringer (talk) 11:44, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

FP Nomination

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:Cygnets Portrait.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cygnets Portrait.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:360° Panorama Zitterklapfen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Panorama Zitterklapfen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Schoppernau 02a.JPG

Hi, I wonder what are the black spots at your image? I added two notes just to show to you what I mean. Please remove them as soon as you see them. Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the hint. They are birds that collect himself. Drag in the winter in the south.--Böhringer (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

I removed question marks from my notes :)--Mbz1 (talk) 19:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

File:BallonKathedrale01.JPG

File:BallonKathedrale01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:42, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schaufschod 2009 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image--Mbz1 00:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schaufschod 2009 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition and quality.--Mbz1 00:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

hello,

i have used this photograph in an art piece. it can be seen here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/23677702@N05/3957491895/

thank you for making such a fantastic work available

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Diana Sw Oberkrumbach 123.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 09:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schaufschod 2009 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good.--Mbz1 22:42, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schoppernau 02a.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments composition is really good but the church is slightly tilted cw --Mbdortmund 22:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)  Info Birds removed and rotated images by 0.5 ° --Böhringer 21:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC) OK now --Mbdortmund 12:38, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Another nomination

Quite an interesting point of view! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

File:BallonKathedrale01.JPG

File:BallonKathedrale01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

ich dachte, dies ist erledigt? siehe [[1]]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skiläufer Böhringer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I wish I saw this scene more often! --99of9 23:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kilkele Kanisfluh Mellau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent Quality! Has very good sharpness and contrast and comes with geotag and a lot of useful annotations. Keep them comming like this! --NormanB 14:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziegenkopf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice colours and composition --Mbdortmund 20:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindos Eselreiten.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Maedin 08:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kobelschlucht 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO good enough for QI --Berthold Werner 18:01, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damülser Mittagspitze Herbst.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diepoldsau Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive mood... and a useful image. --Cayambe 08:32, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Harmonia Axyridis statt Adalia bipunctata

Ein schönes Bild von Harmonia Axyridis haben Sie da gemacht [[2]]. Adalia bipunctata ist es leider nicht! Die schwarze Form von A. bipunctata hat keine weiße Flecken am Halsschild. Zum Vergleich: [3] [4]

• • oh, vielen Dank, werde den Namen und die Bezeichnung anpassen.--Böhringer (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tropfen auf Gras 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice one --Mbdortmund 22:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mischwald Herbst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, nice colours. --Cayambe 21:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traubensaft Schaum 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Illustrative and beautiful at the same time --Ikiwaner 20:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

FP Nomination

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:Love What is It.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Love What is It.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Historism

Could I ask you to look in at Commons:Village pump#Category:Historism? Since you created Category:Historism architecture, you may have some insight into intent. - Jmabel ! talk 23:09, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ginkgo biloba Fächerblattbaum 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice macro --George Chernilevsky 10:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adlergasse 6 Dornbirn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 14:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phlogophora meticulosa, Achateule 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for in vivo --Archaeodontosaurus 13:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Große Ochsenauge, Maniola jurtina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect --Archaeodontosaurus 12:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tanzfliege, Empis opaca auf Schlangen-Knöterich, Bistorta officinalis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice flower with insect bonus--Korall 01:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Karrenberg Panorama 2.jpg

Hi, Böhringer. I promoted your image on QI, but it has quite a few dust spots. Could you please remove them, and then IMO this image could be nominated for FP. Warm regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh, thank. Sorry, but we have no software more about these points. Could you do for me? That would be very nice. Best regards --Böhringer (talk) 08:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

I tried, but I am loosing the quality of the sky in the process, and my edit is worse than your original. I personally would have supported the image for FP the way it is now, but of course one never knows how the voting will go. Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

've tried it with Gimp, has not become ill --Böhringer (talk) 19:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ampfer Rindeneule, Acronicta rumicis 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Its not razor sharp but its fairly large and I think It would be good in 2MP resolution so Im promoting.--Korall 23:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karrenberg Panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool or rathe cold :)--Mbz1 22:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schafe in Schoren.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very beautiful. --MattiPaavola 21:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hasenspuren 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a little more contrast but good --Ianare 05:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuz am See 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. Yann 00:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your vote on my nomination

Hello, thank you for voting on my nomination. I uploaded a new (improved IMO) version over old file. I know it is a very bad practice to do it during FPC process and I am sorry about this. May I please ask you to review the image one more time and to change your vote, if you believe my changes were bad. Thank you for your time.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eulentobel Schwarzach Vlbg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent tones. Beautiful composition. Quality Image. --MattiPaavola 20:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

FP Nom

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:TautropfenRose2.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:TautropfenRose2.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Not a nomination

Just for a change. :P

Happy holidays!

Courtesy of Chico, the Official Commons Christmas Puggle. :P

Best to you and yours across the seas, and thanks for some truly amazing photography. Let's hope next year is just as good! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk)

oh, many thanks. and you a happy new 2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boden Vorsäß Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Of course--Mbz1 21:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speltenzaun genagelt 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I've looked at this a time or two now and thought about it. QI to me --Herbythyme 16:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

File:BananenGelb Böhringer 1.jpg

Category:Yellow fruit is already a parent category of Category:Banana. I would appreciate if you'd revert back. Thanks, ZooFari 16:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

dise explanation from you I understand better. so you're right. I change back now.

User:Böhringer/Template:Credits

Hello,

I noticed your custom credit template, User:Böhringer/Template:Credits. Would you mind if I enable autotranslation on it ?

Basically, nothing would change : the layout and text would be the very same. But french users would see a translation, as faithful to the original as possible. The trick would also work if you add some more languages later. For unregistered users, and users for whom no translation is available, English would be displayed, just like now.

Sincerly, Jean-Fred (talk) 22:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem - is ok for me --Böhringer (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done. The new french translation is located in User:Böhringer/Template:Credits/fr. The layout is defined in User:Böhringer/Template:Credits/layout, and the english text is located in User:Böhringer/Template:Credits/en. You can add more translations by adding subpages (for example User:Böhringer/Template:Credits/de) and copying the contents of any of the other ones.

Jean-Fred (talk) 23:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BorstigeDolchWespe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good image, thanks --Herbythyme 09:50, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fraxern 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 15:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenweiler 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:35, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürrenbach Gletscher 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and interesting. null 23:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC) No such user --Herbythyme 09:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC) QI (mindestens!). --Berthold Werner 15:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaschurn Gundalatschaberg 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. null 23:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC) No such user --Herbythyme 09:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC) Ok. --Berthold Werner 15:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scheiden-Wollgras Eriophorum vaginatum 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- H005 20:34, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Nomination

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:KässbohrerPB260DW 3.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:KässbohrerPB260DW 3.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KässbohrerPB260DW 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Of course. --MattiPaavola 23:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hochälpelealpe Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hochälpelealpe Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello! I have a problem with your english caption of this image. The sentence "Here leads to about 1.200 m the way of Bödele by the Lustenauer hut." is ununderstandable.
In order to make it more understandable, and to translate it in French, I need the following info:
1. What is Bödele (village, hamlet, mountain,...)?
2. Is 1200m the distance between Hochälpelealpe and Bödele? or an altitude? or another distance? or a denivellation?
3. What do you mean by "way"? Road? Track? Path?
--Berru (talk) 15:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz Dornbirn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just the snow is missing. :-) --MattiPaavola 22:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hl Benedikt Hochälpele 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --MattiPaavola 22:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberfallenberg 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Me - I think that is very good! --Herbythyme 21:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC) I agree about this version - but why didn't you upload it as new version of File:Oberfallenberg 8.JPG? -- H005 13:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SchwarzeHeidelibelle w5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. --MattiPaavola 22:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)  Comment Picture too small, outside the criteria of quality -- Archaeodontosaurus 14:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)  Comment It has 2765232 pixels which is more than enough. --MattiPaavola 16:57, 10 January 2010 (UTC) Thank you, now I understand -- Archaeodontosaurus 20:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 180° Hafenmole Bregenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --High Contrast 22:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochälpelealpe 1 Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Türkenbund Lilie, Lilium martagon 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Türkenbund Lilie, Lilium martagon 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello!
Thank you for your wonderful picture! Is it possible to have a caption in English?
--Berru (talk) 18:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hl Maria in Schalzbachvorsäß.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 09:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Schalzbachvorsäß Panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent Quality!!! ---NormanB 22:16, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Au Argenstein Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Wondeful light around the church. Top quality again! --NormanB 20:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterer Argenstein 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:360° Schalzbachvorsäß Panorama 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Schalzbachvorsäß Panorama 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello!
Yank you for this wonderfull picture.
I am sorry, but I have another translation problem.
This sentence you added, "Both settlements are the level two of the three levels of business.", isn't understandable.
What "levels of business" does it refer to?
Does it have something to du with Transhumance (de:Transhumanz)?

ja Transhumance in the Alps - excuse me for my english --Böhringer (talk) 20:35, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

--Berru (talk) 20:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damülser Mittagspitze Lawinenfangzaun 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me --Herbythyme 09:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berberaffe Macaca sylvanus 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically good and cute to top it. --Iotatau 12:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegkreuz Meschach 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A bit tilted CCW. Cross are tilted, but look at icicles and trees. Minor correction need --George Chernilevsky 06:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 0,4° rotated with the longer icicles as reference --Berthold Werner 16:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)  Comment danke fürs drehen :-)  Support Bitte :-). Good now --George Chernilevsky 08:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Sir Maund

Hallo Böhringer, Kompliment für die schönen Bilder von der Villa Maund. Habt Ihr einen Tip, wo man etwas über den Erbauer John Oakley Maund nachlesen kann. In den Bildbeschreibungen nennt Ihr ihn einen Sklavenjäger. Ich habe bis jetzt nur Bruchstücke aus seiner Zeit in Südafrika im Minengeschäft gefunden (auch Zusammenarbeit mit Cecil Rhodes). Danke im voraus --Fredou (talk) 14:07, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

danke, ich weiss auch nicht mehr als hier Villa Maund steht. --Böhringer (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

danke. Das stand offenbar früher mal drin, Benutzer:Giacomo1970 hat bei seiner Änderung am 6. Juli 2009 die Info nicht mit übernommen. Ich sag Bescheid, wenn ich mehr weiß. Grüße --Fredou (talk) 08:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Danke und weiter bei w:de:Diskussion:Villa Maund --Fredou (talk) 09:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Profile size and activity criterion for Commons:Meet our photographers

Dear member of Commons:Meet our photographers,

Two issues have recently been raised at Commons talk:Meet our photographers:

Profile size creep

The page is becoming increasing cluttered due to a tendency among some members to make personal profiles, which are unreasonably large. You are kindly requested to consider the size used by your profile and consider if it has a reasonable size. Note that the same message is being send to all members, so it is up to you to use your own good judgement in this. We are not interesting in setting up exact quantitatve rules. It should be a matter of common sense.

Activity criterion

It has been suggested to introduce an activity criterion in addition to the minimum 10 FPs criterion to be included on the list. You are kindly requested to voice your opinion on this proposal.

--Slaunger (talk) 15:41, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Au Argenstein Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A creative, instructive image; I like it. --Iotatau 11:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC) P.S. A commentator on Friedrich Böhringer's talk page questions whether the image illustrates the Tyndall effect. Additionally there seems to be a lack of consensus what the Tyndall effect actually is (see discussion on the German talk page). This should be noted though I keep up my promotion based on photographic merits. --Iotatau 12:55, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birkenrinde Betula 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 22:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ice Race Langen b Bregenz 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough IMO.--Ankara 16:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC) I agree --George Chernilevsky 06:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:360° Flexenpass Straße.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Flexenpass Straße.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:00, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schoppernau Winterpanorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. The flare due to the direct sunshine is acceptable here imo, in view of the presence of the paragliders. The annotations are also valued. --Cayambe 08:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schoppernau Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schoppernau Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:01, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kojenstein Hochhädrich Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --George Chernilevsky 19:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Sender am Pfänder

Meine Güte, du hast natürlich Recht, entschuldige bitte. Ich sollte wohl wirklich dem Augenarzt mal wieder einen Besuch abstatten... ;-)

net so schlimm :-) --Böhringer (talk) 19:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstadt Bregenz Panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice view --Mbdortmund 22:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010 Pfadfinderfunken Zanzenberg 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done IMO. --MichaelBueker 16:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Note

Hello. I just wanted to inform you that I have given you Autopatrolled rights. This does not affect your editing, but makes it easier for users watching Special:RecentChanges to find unhelpful edits. Regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldhase, Lepus europaeus pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. --Ikar.us 20:29, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldhase, Lepus europaeus 5a.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blaue Pfau Pavo cristatus 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Loadmaster 21:10, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schanerlochbrücke Ebnit 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No substantial problems (sharpness issues in the corners are mitigated by the large size IMO). --Dschwen 15:10, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Image:GamanderEhrenpreis01.JPG

Hallo Herr Böhringer/Archive 2,

Ihr Bild Image:GamanderEhrenpreis01.JPG zeigt ganz sicher nicht Veronica chamaedrys, weil Veronica chamaedrys in den Blattachseln lang gestielte traubige Blütenstände mit vielen Blüten hat, bei denen der Stiel jeder Einzelblüte aus der Achsel eines schuppenartigen, winzigen Blättchens entspringt (vgl. z. B. Image:Veronica_chamaedrys_teveronika_clean.jpg und Image:Veronica_chamaedrys_LC0136_edit.jpg). Ihr Bild sieht danach aus, dass eine Einzelblüte mit langem Stiel aus der Achsel eines blattähnlichen Tragblatts entspringt. Das würde viel besser zu anderen Ehrenpreis-Arten passen, z. B. zu Veronica persica, vgl. z. B. Image:Veronica_persica_060403Cw.jpg. Ich empfehle daher, das Bild zu Category:Unidentified Veronica zu verschieben. Mit dem Risiko einer weiteren (aber nicht mehr offensichtlichen) Fehlbestimmung könnte man es natürlich auch in Category:Veronica persica stecken. Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 15:52, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

danke für den Hinweis - habe die Korrekturen vorgenommen. Der Bildname wird später ersetzt. --Böhringer (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Fieramilano_Rho_Pero_33.JPG

File:Fieramilano_Rho_Pero_33.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schlurcher (talk) 18:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Fieramilano_Rho_Pero_01.JPG

File:Fieramilano_Rho_Pero_01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schlurcher (talk) 18:19, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ammonit, Ammonoidea 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Do you know where the specimen does come from? If so, please add locality to the file descr. --Cayambe 09:10, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thermografie Menschen 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting. --Cayambe 09:54, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Alpen Gelbling, Colias phicomone, Arnica montana 1.JPG

Hi Fred, ich würde gerne versuchen aus dem Bild noch was rauszuholen! Hast du eventuell noch eine unbeschnittene RAW-Datei? Ansonsten könnt ich versuchen aus dem gegebenen noch was zu machen, aber wie ich ja schon schrieb würde ich gerne einen Beschnitt sehen bei dem die Blüte komplett mit drauf wäre sofern du da was hast. Besten Gruß mathias K 14:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

zu schade, ich hatte mich nur auf den Schmetterling konzentriert und RAW mach ich eigentlich nie, weil ich mich dort nicht so auskenne in der Bearbeitung der Bilder. Trotzdem vielen Dank für deinen guten Willen. Fred --Böhringer (talk) 18:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Hm wahrlich schade!;-) Aber kann man nich ändern... RAWs kann ich dir wirklich nur empfehlen die Möglichkeiten die du da noch hast gerade um Farben und Belichtung anzupassen sind echt enorm. Und so schwierig ist es gar nicht! Einfach mal ein den Reglern drehn und guckn was passiert. Die Sony RAW-Software is zum Einstieg schon ganz OK und wenn du dich da ein bisschen reingefuchst hast würde ich dir Adobe Lightroom empfehlen. Falls du dich also doch mal durchringen kannst mit RAWs aufzunehmen und noch Fragen hast kannste mich gerne fragen. Bis dahin, besten Gruß mathias K 08:28, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

echt nett von dir, ich überlege mir ein paar spezielle Bilder zu machen und das dann so aus zu probieren. Komme gerne zurück auf deine Hilfe, danke nocvhmal Fred --Böhringer (talk) 20:01, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

FPC careless reviews

Hi Fred, You may be interested in participatin in this_discussion. Cheers, Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erdbeerblüte, Fragaria 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 12:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

using your foto

http://lightart.posterous.com

thank you for the permission to use your foto.

feel free to leave a message in the blog.

Best regards

The lightart Biennale team

Floods in QI

You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 19:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alpen Gelbling, Colias phicomone, Arnica montana 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpen Gelbling, Colias phicomone, Arnica montana 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großer Kohlweißling, Pieris brassicae, male 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Von.grzanka 20:04, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenblume Helianthus 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice!--Mbz1 20:20, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauhechel Bläuling, Polyommatus icarus 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. Mattbuck 12:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lacerta agilis Zauneidechse 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments cute --Ianare 15:15, 11 May 2010 (UTC). This very nice pic has been nominated here the 9th, and promoted the 11th. Why still in these pages ? a bad example...--Jebulon 09:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC) Are you shure? The history of the file shows an upload of May 9. and no changes. --Mbdortmund 11:40, 29 May 2010 (UTC)