Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 2008
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Alaskan Malamute --Richard Bartz 19:05, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion top quality --Böhringer 08:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Caterpillar Papilio machaon. Author:Entomolo --Mmxx 09:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. MathKnight 20:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Cicada, close shot --Kilom691 21:10, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Crop is a bit tight but the image details within the focal plane are good enough. --Richard Bartz 19:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination European beech walk linking Morlanwelz to Mariemont by User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT. --Dschwen 16:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good colour and composition --Böhringer 08:23, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baudrier CORAX de marque PETZL. Körnerbrötchen 14:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Imperfect stripping (is it the right word this time?). --Eusebius 09:45, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
I would have used masking ;-). Lycaon 15:09, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! --Eusebius 15:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination The Sinai desert in Egypt. (Remark: as the picture was taken from a car, exact geolocation is not possible). -- MJJR 22:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good detail --Mbdortmund 23:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Serpent-Roi Mexicain (created by Vassil) --D-Kuru 20:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Extreme downsampling and poor composition (fake leaves, unfortunate crop). Lycaon 20:55, 25 November 2008 (UTC), Second that. Below the 2MP threshold and still does not look good. --Dschwen 21:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC), If "2MP" stands for Megspixel it should be fixed that 1.701 × 1.208 Pixel = 2'054'808px and thereby (slightly, but above) 2 Megapixel --D-Kuru 15:08, 26 November 2008 (UTC), Nope, that's a Marketingmegapixel. A real Megapixel has 1024*1024 pixels. Anyhao, the moral of the story is: do not nominate images that just barely scratch on the minimum size requirement and yet are of low technical quality. --Dschwen 19:32, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St. John at Kaneo by User:Ori~. --Dschwen 16:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good composition --Mbdortmund 23:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A park pavilion in the town of Zionsville, Indiana. Huwmanbeing 14:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Slightly overexposed, but overall ok for me. --Eusebius 09:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Church of the Primacy of St Peter, Tabgha, Israel --Berthold Werner 11:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Marina in Hovedøya island, Oslo --Pudelek 09:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A knight's tombstone in Dijon cathedral. --Eusebius 22:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Closeup of the skin of an asian elephant. --AlexanderKlink 20:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough. --Eusebius 09:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arbutus andrachne --Butko 08:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Rename please. --Dschwen 16:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Image renamed --Butko 09:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Good image of fruit, branches and branching habit and leaves. -- carol 18:16, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arbutus andrachne --Butko 08:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Rename please. --Dschwen 16:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Image renamed --Butko 09:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Tilted. -- carol 18:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Thomisus onustus --Butko 07:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review Rename please. --Dschwen 16:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Statue on Alex. III bridge; corrections suggested on 11/11 done. --Coyau 14:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review Sorry, but this is a little too much faking for me. I suggest you take a look at {{RetouchedPicture}} and apply it to explain the manipulation. --Dschwen 16:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Done, it was in the file history. Coyau 16:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC). Where did the whitish border come from in the first place? --Dschwen 16:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC). Different levels corrections between sky & statue. --Coyau 16:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC). Aha, so shouldn't that be mentioned, too? --Dschwen 17:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC). Done.--Coyau 17:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Flower of Viola arvensis. --K bogusz1 19:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Lots of artefacts and also some CA on the right petal. Lycaon 13:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Berries of Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) by User:Ragesoss. --Dschwen 16:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok for me. Lycaon 13:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount of beatitudes, Israel --Berthold Werner 08:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment CAs on the right of the cypress (left of the picture).--Eusebius 08:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Better? --Berthold Werner 12:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I think it's a bit better. --Eusebius 12:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC). Beautiful composition, sky a bit washed out at left but acceptable --Tango7174 15:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vaults of Nantes cathedral. --Eusebius 22:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline A bit washed out where the sun hits, but still a very good shot. --Huwmanbeing 14:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC).
Distracting washed out right part, asymmetrical composition --Tango7174 15:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Nantes castle, southern wall. --Eusebius 21:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Autumn in Beskid Sądecki mountains --Pudelek 13:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Arbutus andrachne --Butko 08:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Rename please. --Dschwen 16:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Image renamed --Butko 09:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC) OK --Mbdortmund 21:42, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arbutus andrachne --Butko 08:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Rename please. --Dschwen 16:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Image renamed --Butko 09:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
The other bark image shows fruit but the lighting and framing of this image is much nicer. -- carol 19:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 60163 Tornado connecting rods by User:Ultra7. --Dschwen 16:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 20:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Port Arthur pano by Noodle snacks. --Dschwen 01:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion I think it's very good. --Eusebius 08:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Cyclotron motion of electron beam. --Sfu 20:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline too dark, reflections. Körnerbrötchen 14:05, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cyclotron motion of electron beam. --Sfu 20:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Bad background. Körnerbrötchen 14:05, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Romanesque capital in Dijon.
NB: the column is not straight and it is difficult to find a good vertical, please feel free to suggest a tilt correction.(capital more vertical now) --Eusebius 22:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC) - Promotion it's OK --Mbdortmund 12:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Nomination Romanesque capital in Dijon.
-
-
- Nomination Place Royale fountain: Allegory of the Loire river. --Eusebius 11:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good composition --Mbdortmund 23:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Castillo de san Marcos, St. Augustine, Florida. -Dschwen 17:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Lady on the LH edge in the grass area is missing her legs. Gnangarra 09:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
That is due to a small hill in front of her. There is no stitching seam near that woman. --Dschwen 13:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC) Very good one. I like it. --Lestath 18:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination weiming lake of Peking University,Beijing ,China--Charlie fong 22:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Too dark first plane. --Lestath 10:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Closeup of an eye of an asian elephant. --AlexanderKlink 21:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion interesting --Mbdortmund 22:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pulpit of cathedral Sainte-Cécile in Albi. --Eusebius 21:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good details --Mbdortmund 22:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Circular construction of Iron Age in Castros de Neixón - Galicia (Spain) by AlmaGz --Lansbricae 09:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline The sky is overexposed. The image also lacks detail, maybe due to overly aggressive sharpening or noise reduction? --PieCam 02:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC) CommentMaybe the two reasons. Thank´s for the comments. --Lansbricae 22:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Banyas in Israel --Berthold Werner 08:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Tilted to the right. --Dschwen 16:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Better? --Berthold Werner 17:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Yes. --Dschwen 19:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Autumn in Beskid Sądecki mountains --Pudelek 13:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice view. --Dschwen 16:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Prunus tenella --Butko 07:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Dude, think about renaming your files after you made the IDs! This one is neither showing a complete plant, nor does it have sufficient detail to show flowers or leafs. I suggest making a cleare decission what to show in these kinds of pictures. --Dschwen 16:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination night speed limit in the Key Deer habitat on the Forida Keys. --Dschwen 23:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Why is the 45 sign looks like it has been cut in half? --Mrmariokartguy 14:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC), Now explained in the caption. --Dschwen 15:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
caption clarifies the reason, a night shot to match would make a good VI set Gnangarra 09:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Empire State Building, New York (created by Owenusa) --D-Kuru 15:56, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Image is huge and great, stiching seem to be OK, but imho background is too soft (not enought DoF) + shadows are too hard --Pom² 16:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC). I'll have to go with a decline here. If you are willing to fix the tilted horizon (which is easy using hugin and applying horizontal guides along it) you should move this to CR. --Dschwen 16:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Quincy station platform, Chicago 'L'. --Dschwen 21:38, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 01:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Mount of Beatitudes, Israel --Berthold Werner 12:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline I find the palm trees in the foreground too distracting (plus, they show strong CAs). --Eusebius 17:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination I suggest that the current QI be replaced with this one. This image is also a Featured picture. --Diego pmc 14:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks very ok to me (already a FP). I think the demotion of a QI and the promotion of another are independent. --Eusebius 17:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fomitopsis pinicola. --Wisnia6522 11:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline CAs on the light branches. --Eusebius 17:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seven Mile Bridge on the Florida Keys. )
- Promotion Comment This is a good composition and a nice mood. Another grad-ND picture? I found two areas with major stitching errors which can be corrected. For making large format prints there is too much sharpening. --Ikiwaner 12:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC). I did not apply any sharpening filter. Where did you see the stitching errors? --Dschwen 15:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC) In the power lines and the bridge, near where the power lines take a right-turn and cross over the bridge. --J.smith 17:20, 15 November 2008 (UTC). Whoops! That's a pretty bad one. I'll restitch that one. --Dschwen 17:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC). Ok, uploaded a re-stitched version. This should fix it. --Dschwen 21:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Looks good enough for QI now.--PieCam 02:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The organ -- Albertus teolog 08:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline The image has alot of chroma noise and most of the detail has been lost to noise reduction. Also there are distracting reflections on the organ. --PieCam 02:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Burger King --Specious 00:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline difficult subject, some good features to the image I especially like the lines/dimishing edges left to right, the image feels like something is missing due to the building being cut out on the left edge Gnangarra 11:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amanita muscaria Author:Silver Spoon --Mmxx 02:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient DOF, and focus is right in front of the mushroom. Set aperture wider and make sure the white bumps in the rear don't look blurry. --Specious 08:07, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Beatitudes --Berthold Werner 07:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice! Not the easiest lighting to work with. --Specious 08:09, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Air conditioning unit. --Pbroks13 00:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice work --Manco Capac 09:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pectinaria koreni -- Lycaon 00:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Defenitly QI --Massimo Catarinella 20:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The largest church in Poland -- Albertus teolog 20:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Great shot meets the criteria --CPacker 16:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watermills of the Folón river and the Picón river - O Rosal - Galiza - Spain by AlmaGz --Lansbricae 19:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Not focused well --Manco Capac 09:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Fog border at Bödele --Böhringer 08:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Wow! - Till.niermann 11:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination End of U.S. Route 1 in Key West, Florida. --Dschwen 00:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice composition, great colors Manco Capac 15:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stereum insignitum. --Berrucomons 20:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient DOF and CA around the edges of the shrooms. Try to set up better lighting instead of using the flash? And set the F number higher, maybe like 7 or 8. --Specious 02:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC) FYI the picture was taken in the woods, not in a studio. You are probably right about DOF though...--Berrucomons 20:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
I understand that the photo was taken in the wild. But I also recognise that the ability to produce a QI depends not only on photographic skill, but also having the correct equipment, at the right place at the right time. Your contribution is valuable and appreciated, just not QI by the guidelines. --Specious 01:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Utah State Route 12 leading to Bryce Canyon National Park. --Chmehl 13:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Great colors. Very good image. --Kosiarz-PL 11:06, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Watermills of the Folón river and the Picón river - O Rosal - Galiza - Spain by AlmaGz --Lansbricae 19:20, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline could you please write a description in English!? --Mbdortmund 20:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Too little details. Forest looks painted. Lycaon 17:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Ripe corn (Zea mays) among corn stalks in rural Indiana. Huwmanbeing 17:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion DOF on the limit but still QI. Lycaon 17:49, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination House in Katowice. --Lestath 00:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice image - crisp and clear. It's a shame about the street furniture (especially the light), but otherwise a very nice image. Promoting before Eusebius says he doesn't like the tree :p Mattbuck 18:48, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Coats of arms, Colexiata do Sar, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia--Lmbuga 13:29, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review This is a better licence. --Mrmariokartguy 16:49, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Coats of arms, Colexiata do Sar, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia--Lmbuga 13:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review This is a better licence. --Mrmariokartguy 16:49, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Park in Rudy. --Lestath 08:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
Neutral Slightly tilted counterclockwise (trees and their reflections are not vertically aligned), maybe the branch in the upper-left corner should be removed. Nice composition, although I wouldn't have included the grass in the foreground. --Eusebius 16:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - I'm not so sure, the focus seems to be on the grass rather than the trees - it could use some sharpening and painting out of that twig at the top left. Mattbuck 23:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Coolpix 8mpx camera. --Mrmariokartguy 15:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Noisy, bad edges (I don't know the right term). --Eusebius 10:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
I think the term you were looking for is aliasing, I also find it quite serious. --PieCam 02:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red clothespin --Kosiarz-PL 19:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice bokeh, DOF play and composition. --Ikiwaner 12:07, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination panorama in Sennwald in Rheintal (created by Böhringer --D-Kuru 14:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit of vignetting (before stitching) in the right part of the sky --Pom² 16:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC) An excellent image! I like the tremendous dynamic range and the intense fall colours. I encurage you to cut the construction site on the left and to improve stitching quality (see the white lines on the street) and nominate for FP. --Ikiwaner 12:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The w:Volkswagen factory in Wolfsburg, Germany --High Contrast 16:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion interesting --Mbdortmund 01:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination View back towards the Vehicle Assembly Building and the crawler way at Kennedy Space Center. --Dschwen 16:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Great view! --Mrmariokartguy 02:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Calliptamus italicus (created by Kulac) --D-Kuru 19:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Details are good, but did you try to make a bit brighter? It is very good already, but the thumb doesn't show it--Mbdortmund 14:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sighthound on the tomb of Francis II of Brittany --Eusebius 08:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline main object shows a lack of contrast --Mbdortmund 14:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Louis XIV - version 1 --Eusebius 22:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Muesli --Luigi Chiesa 21:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Araschnia levana. --Bartiebert 21:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp. --Eusebius 10:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Panoramic view from the LC-39 observation gantry at Kennedy Space Center (shuttle Endeavour on the right launch pad), the giant crawler way forks beneath the tower, connecting to both launchpads with the vehicle assembly building. --Dschwen 21:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion This is FP material. --Massimo Catarinella 22:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
But the sun isn't shining and the sky isn't blue! --Dschwen 23:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC) So, since when is a blue sky a criterion for a FP? The picture is of a good quality, doesn't show stitching errors and has a nice composition. Further more, the picture isn't hazy due to the weather. --Massimo Catarinella 19:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A statue on the Alexandre III bridge, Paris. --Coyau 20:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline I'd correct tilt and remove the elements in the lower-right corner. Plus, there is a whiteish border between the statue and the sky (head right arm and shoulder). --Eusebius 16:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Theater of Baden-Baden, Germany - Till.niermann 21:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Overcorrected perspective (see the verticals on the right part) --Eusebius 16:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A porch in the church Camedolite. -- Albertus teolog 11:23, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Noisy. --Lestath 00:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Door of the Parliament of Burgundy. --Eusebius 18:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good details --Mbdortmund 20:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Nantes: cathedral seen from the castle. --Eusebius 22:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination Crypt in the church Camedolite -- Albertus teolog 19:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Lacking sharpness, CA near the edges, distracting flash glare on the center parts, compression artifacts. - Till.niermann 21:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schematic animation of the workings of a lever tumbler lock. (created by NftaDaedalus) --D-Kuru 16:04, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good work --Mbdortmund 16:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Haine-Saint-Paul (Belgium), the St. Ghislain church. (created by Jean-Pol GRANDMONT) --D-Kuru 14:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Perspective. --Lestath 01:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Vaults of the southern bay of Nantes cathedral. --Eusebius 09:23, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good composition --Mbdortmund 16:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Rose window of St. Vitus Cathedral in Praha. -- MathKnight 14:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Perspective. --Lestath 01:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Beskid Sądecki and Tatry. View from "Bacówka nad Wierchomlą" hostel --Pudelek 19:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Sympetrum rouge-sang --ComputerHotline 16:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline overexposed finger. --Lestath 01:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Garnisionskirche Dresden, Germany 35Mpixel --Kolossos 21:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Just great.- Till.niermann 22:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination The power house of the San Francisco Cable Cars. --Chmehl 08:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good composition and lighting. - Till.niermann 21:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mitsubishi Lancer 2008. --MathKnight 13:21, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline The photographer's shadow in the bottom center spoils it. Also, quite strong distortion (due to short focal length? Why are EXIF data missing?) - Till.niermann 17:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Saint James tomb, Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia--Lmbuga 13:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Low quality, mandorla cut by the crop. --Eusebius 08:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination US flag on display for the 2008 election --Specious 09:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good enough for QI --Massimo Catarinella 12:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Cable Car of the Powell-Hyde line in San Francisco. --Chmehl 08:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Possibly a FP with some additional cropping on the right side (woman half in the frame) --Massimo Catarinella 12:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Yes, you are right, I uploaded a slightly cropped version. --Chmehl 14:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sitting ducks --Specious 06:46, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Underexposed --Massimo Catarinella 12:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Adjusted! ;-) --Specious 18:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Yes, but the adjustment made the quality even worse. The only way to get a great shot of this one, is by redoing it. --Massimo Catarinella 23:08, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hornissenkönigin --D-Kuru 19:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion The picture itself is good, but it need English description and scientific name of this bee. MathKnight 21:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
English description + scientific name added --D-Kuru 10:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. MathKnight 17:47, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Pambre Castle (Galicia - Spain) by AlmaGZ --Lansbricae 12:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Tilted. If corrected could be a good QI. --B.navez 14:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Comment New image uploaded with tilted correction. Could you review again? --Lansbricae 15:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Ok now --B.navez 18:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Santiago de Compostela, Galicia. --Lmbuga 00:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Impressive and beautiful. --Luis Dantas 05:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schrammsteine and Falkenstein --LC-de 18:12, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good colors and composition. --Kosiarz-PL 09:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Golden Gate Bridge as seen from Baker Beach. --Chmehl 17:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion nice view --Mbdortmund 18:01, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anime Girl to explain the term "Etchi" (Ecchi) --Niabot 00:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good work --Mbdortmund 00:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Louis XIV - version 2 --Eusebius 22:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 00:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wild daffodil --Know Nothing 18:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent composition, could have been a bit sharper on the corolla. --B.navez 04:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A sanderling, a shore bird, this one is tagged. --PieCam 02:50, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Crop too tight, not enough DOF due to poor exposure solution (high aperture and shutter speed) -- Alvesgaspar 11:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flying buttresses of Nantes cathedral --Eusebius 22:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good details of the Gothic pinnacles. -- MathKnight 21:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Greater celandine flower and leaves (Chelidonium majus) -- Alvesgaspar 11:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion We could admit it as a QI for its technical and aesthetic value even if the flower doesn't look like a wheel. --B.navez 16:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sande Tower (Cartelle), Galicia (Spain) --Lansbricae 09:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Resolution much too low and the tower is obscured by trees.--PieCam 15:02, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Santiago de Compostela, Galicia. --Lmbuga 00:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion this photo is better than panorama --Pudelek 12:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Auditorium Maximum Jagiellonian University. --Lestath 08:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Needs perspective correction, but primarily it's the unfortunate crop that I think makes this picture non-QI. - Till.niermann 17:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Croissant de Lune de quelques heures --ComputerHotline 16:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline The picture is not sharp enough and there are very prominent stitching artefacts. --PieCam 14:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Domestic Cat --Kyro 22:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Framing is too tight. The poor creature nearly bumps its nose... - Till.niermann 17:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Time lapse --Mrmariokartguy 01:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline I don't see the point of this animation. - Till.niermann 11:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Paper Filigree --Es.ntp 14:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Background not real-white, watermark. --ComputerHotline 17:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Petrol station in Pontevea, Teo, Galicia--Lmbuga 18:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline The sky is badly overexposed.--PieCam 19:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nightshot of Wattens, Austria --Know Nothing 18:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice night shot, detailed and well framed and exposed.--PieCam 19:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Temple du capitole de Dougga en Tunisie by Calips --Lansbricae 08:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good picture.--PieCam 13:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Temple du capitole de Dougga en Tunisie by AlmaGz --Lansbricae 08:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Nice picture, but the perspective is inapropriate for QI.--PieCam 13:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Graslin theater in Nantes, France --Eusebius 09:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Jack Daniel's truck. --Mrmariokartguy 02:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Blurry image --Twdragon 18:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Blurry? I don't think it's blurry. It's a good picture taken in a bus on a highway (US-101) --Mrmariokartguy 15:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Château de Chantilly, France. --Tango7174 14:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion --Mbdortmund 20:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Trinity Church in Kraków. --Lestath 12:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Grey sky, some noise inside cloudy area --Twdragon 21:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC) -- No problem at all with the sky: the contrast of blue sky and grey clouds is very nice IMO. But I don't like very much the people on the foreground and the scaffolding at the right. -- MJJR 20:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Detalhe do cruceiro de Maside - Galicia (Spain) by AlmaGZ) --Lansbricae 12:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion --Twdragon 18:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Bergamo, Italy --Luigi Chiesa 23:49, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Bad detalisation --Twdragon 18:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tram in Amsterdam, my first attempt at panning. --Massimo Catarinella 18:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Blurry and overexposed (why 1/30 s ?)--B.navez 14:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Beas river, in Manali, India --Kprateek88 05:39, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Resolution is too low, guidelines indicate that 2 million pixels should be the minimum.--PieCam 03:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Isluga National Park, Chile - Till.niermann 22:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice picture, good exposure and framing.--PieCam 19:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An old image of mine of some houses in Amsterdam. --Massimo Catarinella 16:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice composition, good exposure, some perspective distortion but I like it that way. Overall, good enough for QI.--PieCam 15:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mazda MX-3 GS --Specious 22:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Bad lighting --Berthold Werner 10:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Gemeentemuseum Den Haag by Berlage --Multichill 12:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Nice subject and excellent composition. Unfortunately, technical quality isn't that good: sky partially overexposed, artifacts in the sky, oversharpened image... -- MJJR 20:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Reemerged bridge over the creek called Derenbach --Lucipictor 10:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Low resolution --Twdragon 21:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Neo-Gothic window of a church in Yaffo, Israel. --MathKnight 13:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination: Beskid Sądecki and Tatry. View from "Bacówka nad Wierchomlą" hostel --Pudelek 18:53, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Church in Łaziska Górne (Ober Lazisk) --Pudelek 18:53, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Monument of polish soldiers in Woźniki, Poland -- Przykuta 16:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Gothic rood screen (Albi cathedral, France) --Pom² 20:16, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Statue of a young girl in Nantes --Eusebius 17:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good details --Mbdortmund 18:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zett Fafix slide projector --Berthold Werner 14:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion very good details, but why don't you crop it a little more? --Mbdortmund 18:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
I like to have my photographs in 3:2 format --Berthold Werner 18:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Very useful picture, good details, sharpness and colors --Lucipictor 10:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window in Dijon cathedral. --Eusebius 14:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion I like pictures of Gothic windows. Good detail on the stained glass, though unsharp in the botton. -- MathKnight 14:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Vaults of Nantes cathedral (France). --Eusebius 08:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok for QI --Berthold Werner 14:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance of the harbour of Blankenberge, Belgium -- MJJR 21:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline technically OK but no good composition --Mbdortmund 11:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination: Downward slope to the Plaine des Sables on the road to the volcano of Piton de la Fournaise --B.navez 13:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Luggage belt and trolleys at Bengaluru International Airport --Kprateek88 13:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline unfortunately cropped --Mbdortmund 18:20, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fireworks, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain--Lmbuga 01:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion it's OK --Mbdortmund 18:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Southern rose window of the church Notre-Dame in Dijon, France. --Eusebius 21:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good detail of a Neo-Gothic rose window. MathKnight 22:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Monument to the Israel Engineering Corps for paving Maale Aqrabim road in the Negev. --MathKnight 19:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline CCW tilt. Lycaon 10:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow monorails station at night --Twdragon 19:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nomination --Twdragon 10:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Seat 1500 in Santiago de Compostela --Lansbricae 11:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry. Resolution to low, bad composition --Berthold Werner 12:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Gemeinhaus at Bethabara Historic Park, Winston Salem, North Carolina. by:Cybjorg --Mmxx 19:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 15:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Temple of Christ the Savior --Twdragon 08:01, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Plus: Good exposure, depth of field, and perspective. Also very little chroma noise. Minus: Some luminance noise hides fine detail, but this seems acceptable given the circumstances. --PieCam 13:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parking lot at Bengaluru International Airport --Kprateek88 06:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Large overexposed swatch of sky on the left and no geodata. --PieCam 14:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Latches of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia--Lmbuga 01:52, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Good idea but result is not so handsome. Some individual pictures are clearly under QI requirements concerning light balance. --B.navez 08:09, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Peroxa`s casttle Galiza - (Spain) by AlmaGz --Lansbricae 11:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Minus: Very low detail/bad compression or noise reduction artifacts. Plus: Very good exposure. --PieCam 13:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santa Maria del Mar, Barcelona --Böhringer 09:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline too much black, white parts overexposured, sorry --Mbdortmund 20:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination A sunset near Salinas. --Mrmariokartguy 04:10, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Lower half is underexposed. Plus, to place the sun in the center is not the best composition idea... - Till.niermann 06:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC) What do you expect. It's a sunset with a farm in front of it. --Mrmariokartguy 13:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Take a look at Category:Sunset for ideas on how to creatively use the silhoutting / underexposure so that the picture doesn't look like just two stripes of orange and black. Thegreenj 02:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC) I Withdraw. --Mrmariokartguy 01:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cape Gooseberry flower (Physalis peruviana) -- Elucidate 18:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Unfortunate lighting --Mbdortmund 20:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mary with Son - grave sculpture in Łaziska Górne (Ober Lazisk) --Pudelek 18:53, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Main object too dark and lack of details --Mbdortmund 20:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dew on a nasturtium leaf --Elucidate 09:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
wrong identification (could be Tropaeolum). -- Lycaon 13:48, 27 October 2008Lycaon 17:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment Has been identified correctly as Tropaeolum majus. Elucidate 08:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)(UTC) Support --Mrmariokartguy 03:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fireworks, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain--Lmbuga 00:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good! --Mrmariokartguy 03:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tunnel Hill, high point and eponym of the Tunnel Hill State Trail in Southern Illinois. --Dschwen 21:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Hypericum lanceolatum, wild native flower of Réunion island --B.navez 20:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good details, nice composition, technically OK. TimVickers 17:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hubertia ambavilla, wild endemic flower of Réunion island --B.navez 20:22, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Psiadia boivinii, wild endemic flower of Réunion island --B.navez 14:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC))
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Abbey church in Neuzelle --PetrusSilesius 21:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Review Perspective overcorrected. --Lestath 22:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC) It's more natural now -- PetrusSilesius 17:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Germany, Prichsenstadt, Westtor. --Berthold Werner 17:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good enough for QI --B.navez 15:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Wawel Thief Tower. --Lestath 22:18, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Comment It seems smaller because of right side building. Did you have any other composition? _Fukutaro 16:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC) OpposeBuilding on the right is too much distorted and shows CA. --B.navez 15:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Monterey bay with a tree and a dock. --Mrmariokartguy 04:10, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Distracting composition, no apparent subject. Too jumbled. Elucidate 18:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Blue Angels --Digon3 02:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good action shot of the jets in formation.--PetrusSilesius 13:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shockwave Jet Truck during the Air Show at the Naval Air Station in Jacksonville, Florida. --Digon3 02:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Minus: The area is very hazy/smoky making the truck less clear. There is a distracting wing tip sticking inside the frame at the right. Plus: The explosion in the background is nice.--PetrusSilesius 13:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bamberger Reiter --Berthold Werner 11:55, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good composition and good lighting for this fine sculpture. Vassil 15:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Abbey church in Neuzelle --PetrusSilesius 21:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: NIST (HeadQuarter) in Gaithersburg MD, View of South Pond. Author: Owenusa
--Mmxx 03:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC) - Review {{Subst:Discussion}} Needs categorization (and coordinates). - Till.niermann 16:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Info - done --Owenusa 16:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Nomination: NIST (HeadQuarter) in Gaithersburg MD, View of South Pond. Author: Owenusa
-
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
_on_route_3,_October_2008.jpg)
_-_ul._%C5%9Bw._Wojciecha_i_Muzeum_%C5%9Al%C4%85ska_Opolskiego.JPG)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Sun diagram.svg[edit]
- Nomination Diagram of the Sun --Pbroks13 06:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Support I'd promote as QI except for the stars which IMHO are a distraction of random white dots that dont offer anything to the diagram Gnangarra 11:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I removed the star background. Pbroks13 03:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I was looking for a second opinion but since you have removed them I've changed to support. Gnangarra 13:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose not a good illustration of what is explained about sun structure. I don't find out each of the elements in the right shape --B.navez 15:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- What exactly do you mean? It specifically shows each part. What is confusing about it? And what is not in the right "shape"? Pbroks13 (talk) 16:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- According to the today's english article en:Sun,
- Chromosphere (5) is transparent to visible light. On the diagram it looks opaque.
- Convection cells (3) are hexagonal. I see circles.
- Granules (8) are said to be spaces between hexagonal cells. Nothing shows that on the diagram.
- Sunspots on telescopic images are black stains of various shapes and sizes. I just see small circle spots on the diagram.
- In addition I find grey color for the corona is not appropriate and I don't like the cutting (not easy to watch the layers). Sorry but other diagrams are much more understandable. --B.navez (talk) 09:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I believe I fixed all of the problems:
- How would one show the chromosome if it is supposed to be transparent? All diagrams of the sun that I have seen show an opaque chromosphere.
- The convection cells are not very important to the image; therefore, I removed them.
- The granules look near identical to every image of solar granules out there.
- The sunspots are now no longer ellipses.
- New and (IMO) better looking corona.
- How does that look for you? Pbroks13 (talk) 19:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry I am not convinced. It does not look like the sun. I find the other diagrams File:SunLayers.png File:Sun parts big.jpg more reliable. More opinions ? --B.navez 14:54, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I believe I fixed all of the problems:
- Support I like it, but not the stars put in in the image at random (B.navez discussed it already) --High Contrast 13:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- There are no stars in the background anymore. Did you purge your cache? Pbroks13 (talk) 19:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Not convinced neither. Also too elaborate and inappropriate gradient of the corona. Lycaon 17:14, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- May if that's orange too. --Beyond silence 20:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- If what's orange? Pbroks13 19:10, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- White corona (thant's name of shine?) --Beyond silence 20:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- If what's orange? Pbroks13 19:10, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- May if that's orange too. --Beyond silence 20:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose It seems easily work.. This may be enough what illustrate a sun, but short of image quality. _Fukutaro (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support Not bad. --Mrmariokartguy 02:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per Fukutaro SterkeBak 16:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? -- Lycaon 16:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
File:Pomnik Harcerzy Września 01.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Monument of polish scouts in Katowice (Kattowitz), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 12:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Not sharp enough --B.navez 15:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's sharp! -Pudelek 17:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose important parts of the picture show a lack of details, perhaps underexposured. --Mbdortmund 20:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --B.navez 06:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Skansen w Nowym Saczu, szopa kieratowa Kruzlowa 14.08.08 p.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Treadwheel's shed, open air museum in Nowy Sącz, Poland --Przykuta 16:00, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Ok. --Berthold Werner 12:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Horrible noise in dark parts. --Lestath 21:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per Lestath. And unnatural that green color of the grass. _Fukutaro 15:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --B.navez 06:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Cambronne - buste.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Statue of Pierre Cambronne in Nantes, France --Eusebius 21:47, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
Question Better now? --Eusebius 14:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support Now O.K. _Fukutaro 15:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support good details --Mbdortmund 11:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support - more than good enough for QI. --Kjetil r 14:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --B.navez 06:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
File:3000WSP final 3.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Steeplechase -- Albertus teolog 12:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Full action very good picture though noisy (for that distance and speed). Very interesting because the last runner is to be the winner (Christine Kambua Muyanga) --B.navez 13:41, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- OpposeWhile noise may be unavoidable at capture, it can be remediated afterwards. Lycaon 17:00, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral Interesting picture but much noise and disturbing purple fringes, especially on the left --Pom² (talk) 19:47, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support - nice shot considering that you have used a compact camera. --Kjetil r 14:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support -Pudelek 21:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --B.navez 06:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Pila di Volta.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Voltaic pile --Luigi Chiesa 07:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good value, excellent depth of field --Elucidate 15:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Not really sharp and impossible artificial shadow. Lycaon 21:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The shadow is inappropriate. The image could do without one. Till.niermann 18:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- I have removed the shadow. --Luigi Chiesa (talk) 13:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The edge of object is not clear. Why did you remove the background? _Fukutaro (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Beyond silence 00:56, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- This is the original photo. I have removed the background because in my opinion is confused for encyclopedic uses. --Luigi Chiesa 23:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose, but I would Support the original. I think the DOF in the original serves well to bring the voltaic pile to the for-front and without the background it really looks... I don't know. There is no context or scale, and I think that detracts. J.smith 18:49, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- OK. I have candidated the original. --Luigi Chiesa (talk) 23:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? --B.navez 06:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
File:IOI 2006 bronze medal (front).jpg[edit]
.jpg)
- Nomination IOI 2006 Bronze medal (front) --Kprateek88 07:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support --Twdragon 10:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Shadows are very disturbing, probably not the best background and lighting. --Lestath 20:49, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support The little harsh lighting from the right has the advantage of showing the details of the relief --Mbdortmund 11:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support, I do not find the shadows disturbing. --Kjetil r 14:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support SterkeBak 16:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support The shadow looks a little odd because in images like this we are used to the light coming from the upper left. - Till.niermann 16:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Depreciating background --B.navez 02:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Mbdortmund -- MJJR 20:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? --Mrmariokartguy 03:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
File:IOI 2006 bronze medal (back).jpg[edit]
.jpg)
- Nomination IOI 2006 Bronze medal (back) --Kprateek88 07:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support --Twdragon 10:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Shadows are very disturbing, probably not the best background and lighting. --Lestath 20:49, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support The little harsh lighting from the right has the advantage of showing the details of the relief --Mbdortmund 11:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support, I do not find the shadows disturbing. --Kjetil r 14:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support The shadow looks a little odd because in images like this we are used to the light coming from the upper left. - Till.niermann 16:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Depreciating background --B.navez 02:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Mbdortmund -- MJJR 20:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? --Mrmariokartguy 03:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Chorthippus brunneus_LC0177.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Male Common Field Grasshopper (Chorthippus brunneus]]) --LC-de 22:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- OpposeDislike composition. Foreground distracting and grasshopper's head is out of focus. Elucidate 09:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- SupportQuality acceptable for a macro, composition less relevant here. Lycaon 13:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support Good --Lmbuga 00:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Mrmariokartguy 03:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Helianthus tuberosus controluce.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Helianthus tuberosus flower --Luigi Chiesa 19:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Very nice SterkeBak 14:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I find composition is weak and blurry foreground leaves don't make it good. --B.navez 02:55, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Difficult: Very good colours, but it would be better to show the flowers from the front. --Mbdortmund 11:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- The flower from the front was already present in the category, and this plant is also 3 meters high so is easier than you see that the opposite. --Luigi Chiesa 23:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Underneath angle could be valuable, but use a stool not to be bothered by the first leaves. --B.navez 02:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- The flower from the front was already present in the category, and this plant is also 3 meters high so is easier than you see that the opposite. --Luigi Chiesa 23:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support sharp --Beyond silence 16:07, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Mrmariokartguy 03:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Bufo viridis.jpg[edit]
- Nomination European Green Toad. Ivengo(RUS) 20:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Interesting but would have been better in natural environment. Reflecting areas are overexposed. --B.navez 07:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Reflecting areas are....reflecting areas. Of course they are overexposed, cause they are reflecting the sun. Not a reason for declinig in my eyes, but for illustrating the slimy skin of the toad. I want to discuss this first. Btw. I agree with you that the pic would be much better, if it shows the toad in its natural enviroment. So this isn't a support vote. --LC-de 17:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support sharp --Beyond silence 16:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Sharp picture, the specular highlights give a good idea of the texture of the skin. A more natural background would be nice, but is not necessary. --PieCam 21:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --B.navez 13:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Grenoble in the morning[edit]
- Nomination Grenoble in the morning --Eusebius 17:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose too hazy --Mbdortmund 18:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Haze was the point of the picture, but if it is not obvious, then I guess opposition is justified! --Eusebius 18:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Very good illustration of the town in hazy morning (and unfortunately typical for Grenoble !). Nuances of the background mountains well managed. --B.navez 06:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I would support this image if the description mentioned that the haze illustrated is typical (if that is indeed the case). Otherwise it doesn't seem obvious to me that the haze was the point of the picture.--PieCam 17:16, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Info B.navez mentionned that the haze was typical because there is much pollution in Grenoble, in the form of a cloud over the city. Here, however, I think it is only the standard water mist of a cold morning. Maybe the pollution contributes to the haze, but I'm not sure about it. --Eusebius 17:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support looks good --Beyond silence 16:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --B.navez 13:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Paryż orsay.JPG[edit]
- Nomination The interior of Musée d'Orsay - retouch -- Albertus teolog 08:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Have you got the allowance to take pictures inside the museum? --Mbdortmund 20:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment There is no legal trouble for publishing this picture :
- this is a place with public admittance,
- no piece of art is clearly visible, thus no infringement of author's right
- nobody is recognizable, thus no infringement of private intimacy
If Albertus teolog has infriged the rules of the museum, he could be prosecuted for that but that is his own problem. Museum hasn't any rights on this picture or against its publication. If you eat in a museum, you may be prosecuted too and condemned, but you are not obliged to vomit except if you have swallowed something belonging to the museum. The general image of the museum, even inside, doesn't belong exclusively to it. --B.navez (talk) 08:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Info I asked the museum staff for permission to take photos. Do not prohibited this to me. Forbidden to me just use the flash. Albertus teolog 10:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately, CA issues on the glass ceiling are too strong. --B.navez (talk) 08:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --B.navez 13:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Amanita muscaria 02.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Amanita muscaria --Yarl 15:44, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Nice image. Good level of sharpness. Elucidate 18:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunate light. Lycaon 09:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Seems unsharp --LC-de 17:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support enough sharp --Beyond silence 16:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough for this type of macro picture. --PieCam 21:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --B.navez 13:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Star Trek fans convent 2008 - Fireworks.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Fireworks --Twdragon 10:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 13:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best crop. --Lestath 20:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Question What cropping setting is recommended by you? --Twdragon 18:14, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support looks good --Beyond silence 16:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --B.navez 13:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Chapel in Upper Silesian Ethnographic Park[edit]
- Nomination Little chapel in Upper Silesian Ethnographic Park. --Lestath 22:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support HQ --Twdragon 18:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The lighting is not very good, the painting is in the shadow but the base of the chapel is in direct sunlight, very distracting.--PieCam 19:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support--Beyond silence 22:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --PieCam 15:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Adam Mickiewicz Monument[edit]
- Nomination Adam Mickiewicz Monument in Kraków. --Lestath 12:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support --Twdragon 21:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Disturbing background. --Eusebius 15:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment It isn't possible to change the background... --Lestath 21:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- I know. I'm sorry, my review is only motivated by the guidelines. --Eusebius 21:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The background attracts more attention than the statue, it is unfortunate, but it is very distracting.--PieCam 03:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --PieCam 13:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
File:8-cell.gif[edit]
- Nomination Beautiful animation of an hypercube made by JasonHise -- proposed by STyx 21:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose The resolution is too small. --Massimo Catarinella 23:17, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support Animations are different. --Mrmariokartguy 01:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support I find it nicer than the FP on the subject. --Eusebius 22:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Animation are different but this is really tiny. Lycaon 16:10, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support looks good --Beyond silence 16:10, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Eusebius here. Nice glass effect --Ikiwaner 21:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- I nominated this for FP. --Mrmariokartguy 15:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support I much prefer this to the old version. Elucidate 18:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support per Elucidate. - Till.niermann 21:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? --PieCam 21:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Thunder-like chaotic fireworks.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Thunder-like chaotic fireworks --Twdragon 10:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 13:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best crop. --Lestath 20:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support Yes, very chaotic. But it has some geolocation problens (55°25′40.3″N, 37°11′38.2″E and 55°25′39.6″N, 37°11′38.1″E. Which one is right?)--Mrmariokartguy 02:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --PieCam 15:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Dynamite-5.svg[edit]
- Nomination Dynamite --Pbroks13 06:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support This is a good illustration.--PieCam 13:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like the thick outline of the stick, and it seems that the perspective of the cut "window" is wrong. - Till.niermann 21:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Not bad. --Mrmariokartguy 15:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support I think it's rather good! Perspective seems fine for a technical illustration. --Specious 09:43, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Berlin Herz-Jesu-Kirche innen.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Sacred Heart Church in Berlin-Charlottenburg --PetrusSilesius 13:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline 22:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Overdarkened image --Twdragon
- You cannot support your own images. --Lestath 21:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --PieCam 14:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Wawel Cathedral[edit]
- Nomination Wawel Cathedral in Kraków. --Lestath 22:09, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Tilt correction needed --Twdragon 21:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Did You check it? For me it is good. --Lestath 23:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Beyond silence 16:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support, ach, Kraków :)... --Pudelek 20:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --PieCam 14:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
File:ЗИЛ Panorama.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Panorama of assembly conveyor line at ZIL (the Factory n.a. Likhachev), Moscow --Twdragon 19:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Very nice picture with good quality. --Lestath 23:13, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical quality not OK. Lycaon 10:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Good lighting in every part of the picture, in a not easy situation. HBR 20:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Hard conditions, but there is a lack of details on sides, and a white border on middle top. Else nice picture --Pom² 12:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support very high res, so may too much. --Beyond silence 16:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Despite the blown highlights in the windows, this is a very well executed and interesting picture.--PieCam 03:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically not good enough. This is QIC, I'm afraid. Elucidate 18:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote? --JuTa (talk) 10:23, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
File:TrabantPragueCzechRepublic.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Trabant in Prague --Massimo Catarinella 16:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- OpposeThe red car behind is disturbing, and imho a bit less DoF can better isolate the subject --Pom² 09:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- It is good enough to become an QI. There is nothing wrong with the quality. --Massimo Catarinella 18:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- OpposeThe background is distracting and the lighting is poor (the front of the car is in the shadows). Lighting and backgrounds are criteria to evaluate QI candidates. --PieCam 14:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --PieCam 20:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Pila di Volta 01.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Voltaic pile --Luigi Chiesa 23:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support--Twdragon 17:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Removed red sign. --Luigi Chiesa 15:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --PieCam 15:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Hotel Bristol w Warszawie.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Bristol Hotel, Warsaw, Poland. --Sfu 19:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Perspective overcorrected. --Lestath 20:43, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't agree. Straight walls, are the way old masters where painting, old picutres look like that, and architects are using it. Here it looks good.--Sfu 20:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support At first sight perspective seems overcorrected indeed, but in fact it is not, or so slightly that it is to neglect. For me, this image is O.K. -- MJJR 21:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose It really looks, to me at least, like the top of the building is bulging out towards the camera, I think the perspective is probably overcorrected. --PieCam (talk) 14:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support On the issue of perspective, it is how an architectural projection looks like. In that aspect, I cannot fault the image, vertical features are well aligned with the image y axis. Of course achitectural projection does look overtowering, same here, as your eye expects slanting lines looking upwards (please compare slanting with vertical, both can be justified). -- Klaus with K 13:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- weak Oppose Indeed as Lestath said and/or MJJR said. It is slight but simply seems unnatural perspective (especially the left side wall) for me. _Fukutaro 13:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Lestath 00:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Colexiata do Sar, Santiago de Compostela 07.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Colexiata de Santa María de Sar, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia. --Lmbuga 00:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good enough, nice composition --Massimo Catarinella 11:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I also think the composition is nice, but the shadow on the building is just too distracting.--PieCam 15:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Beyond silence 22:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose unfortunate lighting --Mbdortmund 00:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support enough to QI. I judge what 'shadow part distracting' is stone's material. _Fukutaro 13:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? --Lestath 00:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Pomnik Harcerzy Września 02.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Monument of polish scouts in Katowice (Kattowitz), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 12:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Not sharp enough --B.navez 15:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's sharp! -Pudelek 17:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support ok detail --Beyond silence 16:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with B.navez. Because high compressed jpg. _Fukutaro 13:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Lestath 00:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
DusseldorfGermany.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Rathausplatz, Düsseldorf, Germany --Massimo Catarinella 14:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- didn't we already have this one? --Mbdortmund 18:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- No, you\ve probably seen it before at FPC. --Massimo Catarinella 00:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC) November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose C/A, over-exposure, unsharp. sorry. _Fukutaro 13:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment There is no CA, almost no over-exposure and only two tiny parts are blurry. Sorry, but I've seen a lot worse pictures become a QI. --Massimo Catarinella 14:34, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I think the portrait format is not appropriate for picturing this square: The lower half of the image only shows pavement, and the fence on the right side is cropped. - Till.niermann 07:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Lestath 00:57, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Syringa Vulgaris.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Syringa vulgaris SterkeBak 18:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Misidentified, not Syringa vulgaris, maybe Syringa x josiflexa, has to be checked. --B.navez 14:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- I have taken the photo in a garden centra. It has the right name. SterkeBak 17:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Don't always trust garden centra, ask a specialist. --B.navez 05:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- It looks very much like the image in my book. The name is correct. SterkeBak 07:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry the name is not correct. Watch the leaves : they have not the smoothness of S. vulgaris --B.navez 18:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- You can go here to check. --Mrmariokartguy 16:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry the name is not correct. Watch the leaves : they have not the smoothness of S. vulgaris --B.navez 18:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- It looks very much like the image in my book. The name is correct. SterkeBak 07:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Don't always trust garden centra, ask a specialist. --B.navez 05:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- I have taken the photo in a garden centra. It has the right name. SterkeBak 17:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --Lestath 00:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Kraków - Światowid ze Zbrucza 01.JPG[edit]
- Nomination A Contemporary monument of Svantevit near Wawel Hill. --Lestath 08:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment Colours are OK. This is normal stone colour! --Lestath 00:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral If you say so. I like the horsechestnut on the monument basis. --B.navez 17:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Colours look oke. SterkeBak 15:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support It's ok. --Mrmariokartguy 15:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Fine detail. --Luis Dantas 05:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Lestath 00:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Spandau Nikolaikirche Turm.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Saint Nicholas' church in Spandau --PetrusSilesius 13:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Tilt coccertion needed --Twdragon 18:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment IMO it's perpendicular --PetrusSilesius 13:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Not tilted and it's a good picture. --Mrmariokartguy 01:11, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Fine picture. --Luis Dantas 05:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Lestath 00:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Agapanthus africanus white.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Agapanthus africanus, white variety --B.navez 13:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Comment Tough tow flowers composition, focused on only one flower. _Fukutaro 13:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry my camera is not an Hasselblad and light wind doen't allow long shutter times. Deeper DOF is not possible and composition made this choice of a non focused second flower --B.navez 14:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Well... The difficulty is not beyond comprehension, but I should guessed that you could have noticed it before the taking, and then you have any solutions of this issue. _Fukutaro 17:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment It was on purpose : as it is in my garden, I could have choosen to cut the second flower or to choose closer flowers. I choose to shot deliberately with this kind of result. --B.navez 18:22, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination since nobody can make an opinion. --B.navez 02:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Chantilly4 tango7174.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Château de Chantilly, France. --Tango7174 14:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Nice composition, disturbing tilt. --Eusebius 10:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think the image is tilted. - Till.niermann 21:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Info Thank you for your comments. This optical effect is due to the use of a wide-angle lens, which is the only way to capture the entire chapel at such a close distance (my back was against a wall). A longer focal lens would show only a very partial view. --Tango7174 (talk) 14:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --Lestath 22:18, 15 November 2008 (UTC))
File:Colexiata do Sar, Santiago de Compostela 03.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Colexiata de Santa María de Sar, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia. --Lmbuga 00:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Well done. --Luis Dantas 05:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't agree, bad composition. --Lestath 00:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose As per Lestath, also geolocation is missing.--PieCam 15:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Lestath 00:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Kraków - Collegium Iuridicum 01.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Collegium Iuridicum in Kraków. --Lestath 00:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support - fine picture. --Luis Dantas 05:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I'd support if perspective was corrected. - Till.niermann 22:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Missing geolocation. --PieCam 15:54, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support, good photo. Yarl 16:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Lestath 00:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Zametovka Grape.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Grapes of Slovenian Red Wine Variety Zametovka --Mmxx 07:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Impressive depth-of-field. Perhaps a bit too bright on the background. --Luis Dantas 00:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded a new version with darker darker BG. Mmxx 20:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support may it should get a bit cropped. Howeer good image --D-Kuru 08:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose oversaturated, overexposed BG. Not too sharp neither. Lycaon 19:20, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Lestath 00:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
File:KlausenpassPano.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Klausen Pass --D-Kuru 14:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support I get fisheyes, but otherwise impressive. --Niabot 23:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose You should remove sensor dust in the sky, else ok --Pom² 16:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Info (sodala die Flecken sind weg) Removes sensor dust in the sky --Böhringer 07:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Very nice picture IMO,
if the camera location (geolocation) was added then I would support.--PieCam 15:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --PieCam (talk) 15:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Stade-Hafen.jpg[edit]
- Nomination habor of Stade; Germany. --Kolossos 19:28, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Too dark --Lmbuga 13:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I don't believe so. --Kolossos 21:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support It looks ok to me. Verticals are disturbing, but mainly because of the architecture itself. I like the composition, although it leads to a strange geometry. --Eusebius 16:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support I think is good. --Lansbricae 23:15, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Looks good. Pbroks13 18:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Eusebius 16:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Gdańsk Długi Targ nocą.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Long Market in Gdańsk, Poland. --Sfu 14:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support good --Mbdortmund 16:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Info corrected --Sfu 17:28, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Good lighting and composition. --Kosiarz-PL 15:24, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Lestath 22:19, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Chausey maison de Marin Marie.JPG[edit]
- Nomination House of the painter Marin Marie Chausey Island, France. --Mmxx 13:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment I removed the noise in the sky. Mmxx 19:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support OK now --B.navez 12:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose weird noise reduction artefacts under the trees left. Lycaon 19:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Fixed. Mmxx 18:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Beyond silence 23:22, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --PieCam 14:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Edit1[edit]
- Nomination Cropped, brightness balance changed --Twdragon 10:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Info Previous version has just been promoted, QICbot has been disturbed with the inclusion of the new version and left a few lines here. Should this nomination be removed? --Eusebius 13:47, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sigh. The correct way of adding an edit is to put it in the same subsection. The first image in the subsection will be promoted by the bot. --Dschwen 21:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- It was in the same subsection, within the discuss template. The bot promoted the original but left the end of the discuss template here. --Eusebius 09:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sigh. The correct way of adding an edit is to put it in the same subsection. The first image in the subsection will be promoted by the bot. --Dschwen 21:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Because another version of the same image has just been promoted (see above). --Eusebius 16:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --PieCam 14:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Château de Nantes - armoiries ducales.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Coat of arms of the dukes of Brittany in Nantes castle. --Eusebius 13:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Eusebius 09:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Réunion Demi-Piton PlaineDesSables[edit]
- Nomination Demi-Piton, Réunion volcano --B.navez 16:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC))
- Decline
- OpposeSeems to be generally a bit out of focus, and that's especially distracting on the road. Mattbuck 18:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I could admit any good reason in order to improve my skills but in this very case I think you make a confusion between focusing and resolution. For any fractal stuff, such as vegetation or rocky area, you always have details that are beyond the finest resolution. Watch your own pictures : do you see the nerves of the leaves even if foliage is in the focused field ? Images should not be judged at full resolution but at a fixed size. In addition, in this volcanic location, sun heats the naked and dark rocks which in return give back warmth radiation, creating at ground level a layer of troubled air. Even with hawk eyes, details look really a bit blurry. I didn't want to cheat. I could have done so, downsampling the picture to 2Mp and tool-sharpening like this :
. I preferred to give it plain. --B.navez 07:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --PieCam 02:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Montreal MReine2 tango7174.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Marie-Reine-du-Monde, Montréal, Canada. --Tango7174 14:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Nice picture, but unsharp, with CAs at the windows. Overexposed at some places, but I guess it is unavoidable. --Eusebius 10:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support perhaps accectable because of the atmosphere and the specific situation, where it is difficult to avoid technical difficulties, ausdrucksstark --Mbdortmund 23:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that the picture is too unsharp. Nice composition, though! Hold the camera really still or use a tripod, and resubmit? --Specious 02:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --PieCam 02:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Gerard_'t_Hooft.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Prof. Gerard 't Hooft, Physicist --Wammes Waggel 18:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support good portrait --Mbdortmund 16:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy background, very few of the face is in focus. --Eusebius 17:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Good portrait - Sterkebaktalk 13:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per Eusebius. Good portrait has nothing to do with the quality of the image. Lycaon 19:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Good composition, color, etc. There are a couple of technical aspects that aren't ideal (focal point is a tad close), but to me these don't seem pronounced enough to disqualify it. Huwmanbeing ☀★ 21:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per Eusibius. --Lestath 00:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Depth of field could be deeper, noice could be lower, but it's a great portrait -- good composition, good lighting, great timing. Great illustration of this scientist, in my opinion! --Specious 22:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose There is a colour cast probably caused by the saturated green background. --Ikiwaner 23:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support - I like it, the background is fine, it's just one of those standard backdrops for photos. Mattbuck 14:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promote? Mattbuck 14:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Water frozen in time.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Water bubbling up in a fountain. --J.smith 00:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Rather noisy and composition only so-so. Lycaon 23:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Noise? Where? Those dots in the screen are not noise. Check the others in the series for comparison. --J.smith 05:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Too dark. --Mrmariokartguy 14:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --PieCam 17:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Dresden-Semperoper-gp.jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Semperoper Dresden --Kolossos 19:28, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review * Oppose Too dark --Lmbuga 13:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I don't believe so. --Kolossos 21:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- this oppose template was inserted by User:Lestath. My comment was deliberately not marked as an oppose to avoid early closure and to indicate that it is a minor fixable issue. --Dschwen 22:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, it wasn't clear. I did it only in good faith. --Lestath 10:07, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- this oppose template was inserted by User:Lestath. My comment was deliberately not marked as an oppose to avoid early closure and to indicate that it is a minor fixable issue. --Dschwen 22:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Ok, with this argument I can live. --Kolossos 18:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I think what Daniel wanted to say is that the perspective is overcorrected which disturbs me too. The cylindrical shape of the building emphasizes the error of probably 1-2°. Contrast is OK for me and the composition well chosen. --Ikiwaner 12:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support detail --Beyond silence 23:23, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support detail goes for me too. --Manco Capac 10:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> (draw)--Lycaon 09:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Nantes - colonne Louis XVI.jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Louis XVI column in Nantes, France. --Eusebius 13:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Review
- Oppose ground is tilt --Pudelek 14:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment But the column is vertical. I'm not convinced the ground is perfectly horizontal here. You think my taking the picture could have induced a significative angle between a vertical and a horizontal line in the center of the frame? --Eusebius 15:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support It looks like there is a slope, the column seems vertical and buildings seem vertical.--PieCam 15:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I would like to see the foreground cropped so that the buildings are confined to the bottom third of the image, Gnangarra 01:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Result: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> draw -- Lycaon 09:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Senlis NDame3 tango7174.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Notre-Dame de Senlis, France. --Tango7174 14:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good lighting. - Till.niermann 06:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The thumbnail is beautiful, but the quality is really poor at full resolution. Why is the EXIF data missing? --Specious 09:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Very noisy. Körnerbrötchen 11:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Good lighting indeed, but much too noisy for QI. --PieCam 14:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Lestath 18:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Picea Pungens Young Cones.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Young cones of a Colorado Blue Spruce (created by Noodle snacks) (maybe needs noise reduction) --D-Kuru 15:23, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
Dust spots. Lycaon 17:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC)was fixed. Lycaon 22:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Manco Capac 09:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Nice bokeh, good depth of field and detail.--PieCam 02:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Support per PieCam. - Till.niermann 06:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --PieCam 02:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
File:2008-11-10 Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse in Chapel Hill.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse --Specious 07:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Top corner of building is cropped off, which is a shame. Mattbuck 13:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I chose to zoom in slightly -- it looked better to me. There's nothing in that corner that looks different, and it looks more cozy to me this way. I took several shots, but alas none with the full corner intact. --Specious 23:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- OK, let's take it to discussion. I do like the flare off the sign, pity about the van. Mattbuck 23:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- The truck is there on purpose. It's Lowes' own truck they advertise for rental to get your purchased good home. My intention was to illustrate a Lowe's front entrance as well as possible with a single picture, for the Wikipedia article. --Specious 02:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment the composition is good but could be strengthened by reducing the amount of building and the couple of incidental cars on the left edge. I like the flare on the sign and the vehicle as to the vehicle which adds to composition, presumption is the vehicleis a unique feature to Lowes. I can "live" with the corner of the roof/building being cut off but because of the depth it becomes an additional negative element. Gnangarra 01:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The cut off roof disturbs me less than the tree foliage in the upper-left corner and the flare of the truck. I like the composition, but I think it could be sharper. --Eusebius 09:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support detail --Beyond silence 22:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Crispness should be better. There is also some CA and the perspective could be improved. Lycaon 09:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Lycaon (talk) 09:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Plasma-lamp.jpg[edit]
- Nomination plasma lamp (created by Lviatour) --D-Kuru 22:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Excellent! --Mrmariokartguy 04:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Needs noise reduction. Lycaon 12:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Info Odd, but this image is already a FP. Regardless, I de-noised it. Pbroks13 00:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Fine now. Not really odd as the FP was some years ago already... Lycaon 08:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support It's a nice picture! --Mrmariokartguy 14:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- You cannot support the same picture twice! --Eusebius 09:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Looks fine to me. --Eusebius (talk) 09:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Great picture. Körnerbrötchen 11:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Lycaon 09:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Autumn leaves (in Japan)[edit]
- Nomination Autumn Leaf.--池田正樹 02:04,18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Acceptable quality. Nice colors and... well... composition. --Dschwen 16:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Species must be identified before. I would say Zelkova serrata but I'm not used to asian species. Please check. OK I've just seen now categorization but you must put it in description and in name --B.navez 04:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- OK, I did it myself. --B.navez 07:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you Mr.Bnavez from masaki ikeda
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --B.navez 02:31, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Bydgoszcz panorama rynku.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Market Square in Bydgoszcz, Poland. --Sfu 06:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose a little tilt in my opinion... --Pudelek 13:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)<
- Question to the right side? --Sfu 22:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment exactly --Pudelek 14:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Info slightly rotated. --Sfu 19:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose too much in shadow. --Lestath 20:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? -- carol (talk) 03:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
File:AskøyBridge panorama.jpg[edit]
- Nomination The neighbourhood of Kjøkkelvik (created by Aqwis) --D-Kuru 19:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Looks ok to me, in spite of the lighting in the upper-left corner. --Eusebius 10:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Lots of artefacts in the water. Lycaon 12:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support sharp --Beyond silence 23:24, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Maybe small for a panorama, but nice anyway. You could also geolocate it --Pom² 11:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I like the picture but would like to see the location (geodata) included before supporting. --PieCam 14:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support very good, but geocoded please --Pudelek 08:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Lestath 10:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Mbdortmund 23:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --TimVickers 02:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? -- carol (talk) 03:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Casiña da Moura - Encoro das Maus de Salas - Muiños - Ourense.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Dolmen of "Casiña da Moura" - Maus de Salas - Galicia - Spain. --Lansbricae 19:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Noisy. --Lestath 18:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Comment
Ok, I tried to correct the noises, but the result is not very good, I believe --Lansbricae 22:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
New version retouched by Lestath. Could be review it now?
--Lansbricae 11:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Better put it as a new nomination, that's less confusing. Lycaon 18:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I´ll do it. Sorry. --Lansbricae 18:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Loxahatchee_boardwalk.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Cypress Swamp boardwalk in Loxahatchee NWR. --Dschwen 23:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Withdrawn * Oppose Should be crisper, especially the Tillandsia looks too blurry. Lycaon 13:15, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- No problem, I just fixed that. --Dschwen 20:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
The slight improvement doesn't warrant the downsampling. Lycaon 22:24, 25 November 2008 (UTC)- Mh, my guess is you are talking about the sharpness deficits in the corner of the frame? I could crop those away and get away with way less downsampling. But I have a feeling that would not satisfy you either... --Dschwen 19:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- No problem, I just fixed that. --Dschwen 20:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Clothes pegs.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Some Clothes pegs SterkeBak 20:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Seems to fulfill the criterias. --Calandrella 21:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose For a 'studio picture' I don't like the harsh shadows, the vignetting and the low DOF. Lycaon 01:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The effects of the flash lighting and the out-of-focus yellow peg detract from the composition. Huwmanbeing 13:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? -- carol (talk) 18:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Kankakee_aerial.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Aerial shot of Kankakee, Illinois. Anyone how has taken a picture from a plane should appreciate the effort that went into postprocessing... (removal of vignetting, haze reduction while keeping the colors natural) --Dschwen 00:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support I don't think I saw any picture taken in a plane look as good as that before! --Mrmariokartguy 15:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose That's probably true, but unlike at FPC it is the technical side (i.e. the result) that counts, not the circumstances. Lycaon 08:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Then you should address the technical issues. Keem in mind though that the image has 12MP, so there is quite some headroom here. --Dschwen 14:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- OK. Though there are of course mitigating circumstances, they IMO do not count for a QI (that would count for FP). Again I would like to see a sharper image and a bit more contrast. I admit that you probably would have to use a hot air balloon or so to achieve that, but still, such are the results presented. Lycaon 22:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, but this is bogus. The image has 12MP. You cannot go around yelling OMG downsized and complain about lack of sharpness in an image this large! Or should I be penalized for having a DSLR with a large sensor? I could easily deliver a tack sharp image at the size most of the contribution here, but I choose not to downsample (I find this kind of pixelpeeping rather discouraging though). The mitigating circumstances argument goes both ways, images are frequently turned down for being easily reproducible at a higher quality. This one is not easily reproducible, and I quite frankly think your quality expectations are too high. --Dschwen 23:33, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry too that you feel my expectations are to high (I can't deliver myself to those standards most of the time so I don't nominate but just post), but bogus is not the correct word for it, and if you are fair, nor is pixelpeeping. If you can at times produce pixel perfect not downsampled images (I've seen quite a few from your hand), then you can't blame me for faulting the ones that are sometimes not. Lycaon 00:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- That is the essence of my comment: You are working with different standards for different photographers. Seems not only unfair, but unproductive. The enduser won't care who took the picture. The QI seal is supposed to ensure them that the image exceeds a fixed minimum standard. --Dschwen 00:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry too that you feel my expectations are to high (I can't deliver myself to those standards most of the time so I don't nominate but just post), but bogus is not the correct word for it, and if you are fair, nor is pixelpeeping. If you can at times produce pixel perfect not downsampled images (I've seen quite a few from your hand), then you can't blame me for faulting the ones that are sometimes not. Lycaon 00:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, but this is bogus. The image has 12MP. You cannot go around yelling OMG downsized and complain about lack of sharpness in an image this large! Or should I be penalized for having a DSLR with a large sensor? I could easily deliver a tack sharp image at the size most of the contribution here, but I choose not to downsample (I find this kind of pixelpeeping rather discouraging though). The mitigating circumstances argument goes both ways, images are frequently turned down for being easily reproducible at a higher quality. This one is not easily reproducible, and I quite frankly think your quality expectations are too high. --Dschwen 23:33, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- OK. Though there are of course mitigating circumstances, they IMO do not count for a QI (that would count for FP). Again I would like to see a sharper image and a bit more contrast. I admit that you probably would have to use a hot air balloon or so to achieve that, but still, such are the results presented. Lycaon 22:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Then you should address the technical issues. Keem in mind though that the image has 12MP, so there is quite some headroom here. --Dschwen 14:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Overall a very good photo. There's still a little bluish atmospheric haze remaining, but I'm inclined to see that as a natural aspect of shots covering such an extremely long range. I might also suggest a mild unsharp mask to make the fine details a bit crisper. Still a great shot. Huwmanbeing 13:55, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? -- carol (talk) 18:07, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Jesień w Sądeckim1.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Autumn in Beskid Sądecki mountains --Pudelek 13:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support
Tree ID?Otherwise good quality and compo. --Dschwen 16:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC) - Tree(s) IDed --B.navez 17:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support like Dschwen --Mbdortmund 23:22, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? -- carol (talk) 03:51, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Arbutus andrachne fruit (Ab plant 98).jpg[edit]
.jpg)
- Nomination Arbutus andrachne --Butko 08:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- I think this is a good shot of the berries. --Specious 08:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC).
Request Rename please. --Dschwen 16:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Done. Image renamed --Butko 06:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, Support -- carol (talk) 18:38, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Mbdortmund 23:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? -- carol (talk) 03:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Church near Monastiraki.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Church in Athens (resubmission, went to a draw last time). --Eusebius 17:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Seems to meet the criterias. --Calandrella 17:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Noise reduction has blurred fine details (e.g. grass). Lycaon 21:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Question Grass? Where in the picture do you see grass? --Mrmariokartguy 00:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Info On the roof. --Eusebius 07:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- I never knew that people grow grass on the roof. --Mrmariokartguy 00:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Not just the grass but also where the paint is peeling and other points of interest. As difficult as it can feel to agree.... -- carol (talk) 04:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? -- carol (talk) 04:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Katowice - Dzień niepodległości 2008 - 24.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Independence Day in Katowice. --Lestath 01:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline shadows are an issue, maybe possible to crop and reduce this issue not sure the end result will be a QI Gnangarra 11:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support detail --Beyond silence 22:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose lighting --Mbdortmund 22:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Motion blur on front hoof is nice but the lighting is a problem; much detail is lost in the shadows. -- carol (talk) 03:56, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? -- carol 03:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Bydgoszcz spichrze.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Granaries in Bydgoszcz, Poland. --Sfu 22:18, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Info retouched version uploaded. --Sfu 22:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral Better, although CA is still visible in some parts. --Eusebius 08:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- OpposeIt is rather low in details. Tiles on the roof seem fused. The wood looks smooth like plastic. It looks like noise reduction and sharpen filter were overused. Am I wrong? I would like to see the original picture... --Berrucomons 13:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- No such thing made here, just lamp and part of the building removed. --Sfu 07:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --Berrucomons 14:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)