This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
The en:Democratic Unionist Party is in the parliament and supports the Conservative Party government. The DUP is a right-wing populist party (see here -- source: Ingle, Stephen (2008). The British Party System: An Introduction. Routledge. p. 156.) -- and it's agreement with the Tories may quality the UK for being shaded medium blue.
Either way, the UK should be shaded at least light blue, as the DUP sits in parliament, and some factions of the Conservative Party (including some MPs) are right-wing populist.[1] --1990'sguy (talk) 14:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Yes, it has been fulfulled -- Maphobbyist notified me on my talk page about this, but I neither of us apparently noted it here. --1990'sguy (talk) 02:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Need to modify the map to include Virginia (home of Liberty University) and New Mexico (home of New Mexico State) which will be FBS Independents for the 2018 football season. --Jayron32 (talk) 20:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
These time zone maps of Europe files are obsolete and need to be updated because they don't show the latest changes for Northern Cyprus,Turkey or Crimea. Northern Cyprus reverted back to UTC+2 and Daylight Saving Time (DST). Crimea and Turkey are in time zone UTC+3 and don't use Daylight Saving Time (DST). The de-facto situation in Crimea does not imply endorsement of any side of the conflict but only reflects the actual usage. Furthermore many Wikipedia articles use these files. For reference see the source: https://www.timeanddate.com/ --Maphobbyist (talk) 23:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
New Zealand launched its first orbital rocket today (details here); as such, its colour needs to be changed on this map
The two main islands of New Zealand (and accompanying offshore islands immediately to the south and east) need to be shaded red, replacing the current green shade. --Grutness (talk) 03:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: ; I'm sorry for being late, but I have some problems with my internet connection, therefore, I can't see the complete SVG file. If it's applicable, I believe, JPG file will be easier to be seen. Anyway, if you think it's good, you can upload it to commons. Thank you very much for your efforts.--Aladdin (talk) 08:00, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment@Mohmd1429 and باسم: , Thank you both for your efforts. Kindly note that the airport within Damascus Rural is "الضمير" (Dumair) not "تدمر" (Palmyra). In addition, Al Quneitra Governorate is on the western side of Dar'a, but in Arabic maps, it looks like on its north. One more thing, the word "الصفا" near Tiyas airport wasn't mentioned on the original map nor on its English wikipedia article nor in its Arabic one.--Aladdin (talk) 12:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Please UNLIST Belarus. There are NO Stolpersteine there. Yes, the collocation of Stolpersteine in Belarus has been announced (but for unknown reasons it never happened.) Please do not ask for proof. There is no proof for something that never happened. --Meister und Margarita (talk) 18:34, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Perfect! Thank you so much. It would be great if we could use it to overwrite the original, that way we don't get yet another range map on commons. Mariomassone (talk) 16:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
@Mariomassone: Now you can find it as an update of the original file. If you are happy with this please put the code {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} on this request so it can be archived, thanks. Done --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Please vectorise the file, improve the text labels and (optionally) correct the map by inserting a border for South Sudan--Hazhk (talk) 00:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
I've always found the presence of this map on the New Zealand page to be odd. What's wrong with just adding labels to the existing orthographic map of New Zealand? That would remove issues with Sudan, because it's on the other side of the globe. Gringer (talk) 13:30, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
please create closeup map of the islands in relation to Newfoundland. The article has two long-distance maps which show them as specks… --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Possession of child pornography is illegal in Argentina, should be colored orange. Bicycle helmets are mandatory in Argentina, should be colored red. Thanks. --Yilku1 (talk) 20:30, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
Done – @Yilku1: Had some issues with cache on the laptop, but viewing on phone, I can see the newer file. I guess it is done. Have a look, and if it is fine, please let me know so that I can mark it as resolved. acagastya22:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
I would like to request a map of the Gascon campaign of 1345, based on the following map. A change is also required to the text, from "Lancaster" to "Derby", as Henry had yet to succeed to Earldom of Lancaster during this campaign. Regards Newm30 (talk) 06:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
1. Can the Isle of Oléron, be named as Île d'Oléron.Done
2. Can St. Jean d'Angély, be named Saint-Jean-d'Angély.Done
3. Can La Réola. be renamed La Réole.Done
4. Could the dates in textbox be centered?Done
5. Can the "route" lines be made thicker?Done
6. The "route" line from Bordeaux to St Macarie needs to be as per Derby advance.Done
7. The "route" line from Périgieux to Saint-Émilion needs to be Derby retreat and could be a different colour/shade.Done
8. Can the "route" line from Auberoche start closer to the place marker and be a different colour/shade, including "route" line from Auberoche to La Réole?Done
9. Could Périgord be placed to NE of Périgieux, similar to text Saintonge, to identify County?Done
The map is looking great. For information the GAN is just wrapping up and I am hoping to move it straight on to ACR. Some thoughts:
10. The legend. Could the labels in this read:
Derby's retreat
Derby's advance
Derby's advance to Auberouche
Louis of Poitiers' advanceDone
11. Could they be reordered as below, so as to be in chronological order, which I think will make more sense to a reader.
Derby's advance
Derby's retreat
Louis of Poitiers' advance
Derby's advance to AuberoucheDone
12. Would it be possible to delete St Macarie, which is not mentioned in the text, and replace it with Langon, which is - several times? Langon is about 3 km WSW of St Macarie, on the west bank of the Garonne.Done
13. Any chance that Aiguillon could be added? It is at the junction of the Lor and the Garonne, in the SE corner.Done
14. Périgueux is the capital of the province of Périgord. Would it be possible to have Périgord in a similar style to Agenais and Gascony?Done
I have not used the map creation service myself and I am extremely impressed by the speed and quality on offer. Clearly I have been missing out. Many thanks for the work on this. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
@Newm30: I'm just pinging you, you contact the others needed.
Regarding #8, there is only 1 line going from Auberoche but you are talking about 2 different, I don't understand?
You have fixed the issue. Sorry for the confusion. Done
My idea with keeping the same broken line for all Derby movement and then change the outline is to keep some uniformity, to me it's easier to view the information in the map.
Ok, I understand, leave as is. Can we change route lines Derby's retreat to Orange and Derby's advance to Auberouche to Purple and Derby's XXX (return to La Réole) Green?Done
As St Macarie was requested to be removed should the lines to/from St Macarie be changed to Langon?
There is no mention of Derby retreated to Langon. Keep St Macrie at present and see whether Langon could be added.Done
In the legend should the line/arrow with green and XXX be included and if so which text and order?
Keep and name Derby's return to La Réole. Suggested green colour of route line above.Done
@Newm30: Thanks for pinging me and keeping this request easier for me to grasp. Draft 4.
Neither orange or purple is very visible against the red line so right now I haven't changed anything, and why do you need outline color for line toward Auberoche, it has another type of dashed line? --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Map of the Gascon campaign of 1345, part of the Hundred Years' War. This map shows the English and French army movements during the campaign and the most important battles.
@Goran tek-en: The map looks great. However, which I put it in the article, Gascon campaign of 1345 in the English Wikipedia, at any reasonable size, the print is very small. Would it be possible to:
Enlarge the legend box.
Focus in on the 'action' by cropping all four sides.
Make all of the type, especially the place names, larger.
@Goran tek-en: ,@Gog the Mild: - I can see what Gog the Mild means by the map when compressed to fit on article page can be hard to read. I am happy if you both agree on the changes. I don't think however any amount of enlargement will render it completely unnecessary to open image to view 100% of what map is intending to do, on Wikipedia. Regards Newm30 (talk) 20:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
When I draw a map here at commons it's often for a specific purpose but very often they are used in several different context and there fore I make it so it will work in approximately 100% of it's original size. If it needs to be used in a very different size you often have to do a new version to make that work. If a map is to be made in a particular size I need to know that size before I start working on the map, this is even more important when I do an illustration, icon or similar.
I don't create articles like what you guys do on wikipedia but my understanding is that (there or any other place where html or similar is used) often you show a thumbnail and if you are interested you click on that to view it in a bigger view able size. This is a big difference from something present on a physical media book, paper, etc.
Of course I (we, who do graphic work) should try to fulfill the requester's wishes and needs but with the above and other parameters in mind. So to make this happened I propose the following;
Newm30 You put the code {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} on this request so it can be archived.
Gog the Mild You start a new request using "▶ Make a new request ◀" link at the top of this page, ping me in it and I will make another version of this map as you would like it to look. --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Map of the route of Lancaster's chevauchée of 1346, part of the Hundred Years' War. This map shows the Lancaster's movements during the campaign and the most important sieges and sackings of towns.
For Stolpersteine in Italia I need some maps, pretty simple stuff. I would like to be able to do it on my own. I'm looking for someone who could explain to me the basics of creating a map (different colors for the different regions, highlighting the cities with many Stolpersteine). Thanks in advance.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 15:06, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Is it possible for you to color the map of the state of Palestine for use in the Azerbaijan–Palestine relations article?--Sakiv (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: - Thanks for picking this up. Angleterre=England, Saint Empire=Holy Roman Empire, Normandie=Normandy, Bretagne=Brittany, Royaume de France=Kingdom of France, Guyenne=Gascony, États pontificaux=Papal State of Avignon. Ponthieu, Maine, Poitou, Navarre and Aragon are the same. Regards Newm30 (talk) 08:40, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
@Ezarate: It would be great if you use the "Make a new request" link at the top when you ask for something here. In that way we get all the code we need to work with it. In the way you have linked to the source it appears not to exist on commons, one way is to write like this [[:file:Silverpitlocatormap.png]], file:Silverpitlocatormap.png, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 12:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
@Gikü: Now there is a corrected version. If you are happy with this please put the code {{resolved|1=~~~~}} on this request so it can be archived, thanks. Done --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:09, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Please change "Decembrer1940" to "December 1940" and "17 and 8 December" to "7 and 8 December" (Macedonian version also has this second error) --Davidships (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Can one of you add the crescent and the cross to the current Palestinian flag to conform to the Palestinian flag during the revolution. Like this flag.
Description of third image (if needed; don't request too many at once, though)
Article(s): [[]]
Request
SVG version of PNG map above. I'll use it to make a town by town map of the 2018 senate election in Vermont. --MB298 (talk) 07:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Please make English version named File:Free_State_of_Fiume_1920-1924.png-the only names needing changed are "Italy" and "Yugoslavia"… --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:46, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
I would like a map to be created of the route of the Chevauchée of Edward III through Northern France in 1346, based on this map. Battle markers will be needed at Caen, Blanchetaque (crossing of the Somme), Crécy and Calais. Regards --Newm30 (talk) 03:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
@Newm30: Draft-2. I wrote 11-12 July instead as we used that format before, If you want the one you wrote just tell me. Also should not "Bay of the Seine" be the biggest one and "Baie de la Siene" smaller (if there at all) as the other two names of the Channel is in English?, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 11:12, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: - Thanks very much for the fast response. I concur with "11-12 July". en:Baie de la Seine is the English wikipedia name of the article for the bay, so I that is why I thought Bay of the Seine underneath would clarify. Happy if you want to go with "Bay of the Seine" instead. Have struck through and marked as completed those that have been done. Please see couple outstanding. Thanks once again. Regards Newm30 (talk) 12:25, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: - Thank you very much for your very important input, excellent map creation skills and easy approach to my map requests. Your assistance and expertise is much appreciated and it is always a pleasure to work with you. The map is fantastic as usual and ready for upload into Wikispace. Regards Newm30 (talk) 09:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
@Newm30: Thanks for that, you make it easy with your organized feedback, I will need the following;
Map of the route of Edward III's chevauchée of 1346, part of the Hundred Years' War. This map shows the English army movements during the campaign and the most important battles.
Details of your request go here: Please modify https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Somalia_pol02.jpg with two minor amendments; (1) change "Giohar" to "Jowhar" (en:Jowhar) as this is now the most common name; (2) insert a new location, Adado (en:Adado), in Galgaduud, about half way up the map. Please mark Adado in with a black dot, same style as Ceelbuur, on the road north of Dusa Marreb. The road from Dusa Marreb to Galcaio is basically in three bits; first one that bends slightly to the east, then it bends slightly to the west (bisected by the green dotted line west-east), and then it takes a hard almost 90% turn to the east again. Please mark in Adado half way up the second bit, the one bending to the west, which should be south of the green west-east line. Many thanks!! Buckshot06 (talk) 08:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
Request taken by Goran tek-en (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC) New version is uploaded. DoneI also mark this as resolved as it's so old and the user has no account here. :This section was archived on a request by: Goran tek-en (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Geographical range of grey wolf and golden jackal together
Image #2: The en:Aleutian Islands are shaded red (as though they are part of the USSR) even though they were (and are) part of the United States. This should be fixed.
Image #3: The U.S. should be colored green on this map, as homeschooling is legal in all 50 states. What is disputed is not the legality of homeschooling, but the "amount of state regulation and help that can or should be expected", according to the article en:Homeschooling in the United States. --1990'sguy (talk) 15:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
3: There seems to be a discussion about that map and it is marked "The factual accuracy of this map or the file name is disputed." and it seems to have many misstated areas so I think no one really knows what to do. --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:19, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Need a location map for Province No. in Nepal, both adm. and relief. Also need location map for 14 districts in Province No. 1 of Nepal… --Raju Babu (talk) 17:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
@Raju Babu: If this was solved it should have been marked with {{done}}{{section resolved|1=~~~~}} so it can be archived. Otherwise it's really hard for us who work here to know which request to attend to. So please do so and start a new request with your other needs, ping me there and I will help you but you will also have to provide me with sources I can use for the different adm. areas, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 12:44, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: I thought {{done}} is marked by wikigraphists, so my attention was not on this.
File:Location Map Asia.svg Nothing to update here. Done
Article(s): Many
Request
South Sudan (and if it is also missing, Montenegro) urgently needs to be included in these blank world maps, because many users create and upload new maps based on these obsolete maps, without realizing this. Updating all these maps will spare time consuming border changes in the future (and also if new countries become independent in the future). The maps are based on de-jure borders. (I am adding South Sudan (as well as Montenegro and other possible missing updates) in the PNG maps in Category:Maps needing South Sudan political boundaries and then remove this category after updating them. There were close to 1100 maps since I started to update these files, now it is reduced to less than 800 maps, but there is a very long way to go and it is very time consuming and almost never ending, as there are very likely many more unlabeled maps.) --Maphobbyist (talk) 13:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
There's a template for that: {{update|South Sudan}}. I'd recommend adding this to these maps (and any others). I've also noticed that some of these maps have 'South Sudan' mentioned in the file changes; have you checked that these maps need updating prior to putting them in the gallery? Gringer (talk) 21:55, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
@باسم: Updated and if you are happy with this please put the code {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} on this request so it can be archived, thanks. Done --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:04, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
I request an SVG map of the political territorial division of the Second Mexican Empire (1865) with the map design "option 1". If possible, also add some lines to compare the territorial limits of 1865 with the current ones
@Hispano76: You have to be more specific I/we don't know anything about this subject. Provide source and what you want, not a lot of information around, thanks. Please ping me. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:29, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Goran tek-en Well, I'm redoing the request in the hope of clearing it up.
I ask for a SVG from this map but one that only has the proposed 1865 boundaries and not the current territorial division. In other words, remove the "grey" lines from the map and make the dotted lines "long".
Another clarification, I want you to allow that this map can be "colored", that is in case there is interest in making a population statistic with the table of this web page, something similar to this European map (Example).
@Hispano76: Now there is a draft for you to check. All the different areas are divided as the division borders. I have also (just for this draft) colored areas and island with a temporary line around so you can tell me where the different islands belongs. Give me feedback, do you want names or anything else just tell me thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 10:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: Thank you very much, I like the way it looks.
According to the website I linked to, all the lines to your department are correct. Only the islands of the Orange line are not mentioned on the website but I could assume it belongs to Autlan because of the proximity. Or we can leave it "blank" until there are sources to clarify this.
About your second question. You could make another map with the names of the departments if you like, so you would have two, a map with the divisions and the names of the departments and another with only the territorial divisions. What do you say? Hispano76 (talk) 16:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
@Hispano76: Here is two different drafts, is this what you mean?
The second map, the names of the entities are not well visualized because they are intercut (Tulacingo..) and the territorial division is not visualized, perhaps it would be good that instead of having names intercut, they were numbers as it was done with thesemaps or the second option is that they have different size of letter and they are in horizontal order, vertical or etc, something similar to this other map. At first glance, there doesn't seem to be any misplacement with the names.
But I also leave you free to decide to do it or leave it as it is. You'll say. Anyway I thank you very much for your great work. Hispano76 (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
@Hispano76: I don't understand what you mean by "intercut (Tulacingo..) and the territorial division is not visualized".
Is it that the words are on two lines to be able to fit?
What is not visualized, is it not the correct borders?
@Hispano76: I guess that the second language is Spanish so I used that for the descriptions and also I added Captions. If you don'y know about Caption read here.
Now you can find them under your names.. If you are happy with this please put the code {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} on this request so it can be archived, thanks. Done --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:18, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
The "Cultural triangle" is literally a triangle between the cities of Anuradhapura/Polonnaruwa/Kandy in Sri Lanka.
Would anyone be kind enough to create a map showing this, or let me know how to do? With Inkscape I added a red triangle over a screenshot of OpenStreetMap, but the result is not great because the 3 city names are not all visible, and labels of unrelated smaller cities add to the mess. Thanks! :-) --Syced (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Description (English): Situated in the centre of the island, covering an area which includes the World Heritage cultural sites of the Sacred City of Anuradhapura, the Ancient City of Polonnaruwa, the Ancient City of Sigiriya, the Ancient City of Dambulla and the Sacred City of Kandy.
Caption (English): Sri Lanka’s Cultural triangle
Categories: Maps of Sri Lanka, Culture of Sri Lanka
Divide blank world map with subdivisions by continents
Blank Map of the World
example/style 1
example/style 2
Example/style 3
Article(s):
Request
Hola estimados, quiero pedirles que dividan el mapa por continentes con uno de los dos estilos (style 1 o style 2 o 3) para que puedan verse mejor el mapa y más cerca. Sería útil para algunos artículos que existen. Al menos lo pido para Norteamerica (que incluido Centroamerica y el Caribe además de Groenlandia y Hawaii) porque hay otro similar pero siempre le falta uno que otro "territorio". Pueden hacerlo PNG o SVG, como gusten-
I don't know how many speak Spanish (I think it is) here but no one has taken this and I don't know how to contact the requester. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)}}
Goran tek-en Hello, I am interested in this request
A translation would be:
"Hello estimates, I would like to ask you to divide the map by continents with one of the two styles (style 1 or style 2 or 3) so that the map can be seen better and closer. It would be useful for some existing articles. At least I ask for North America (which includes Central America and the Caribbean as well as Greenland and Hawaii) because there is another similar one but it always lacks one or another "territory". You can do it PNG or SVG, as you like."Hispano76 (talk) 20:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Request taken by Goran tek-en (talk) 14:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC) @Hispano76: I can help you but first we have to check some things.
Have you searched commons to see what already exist, if not please do so.
If we will do new ones: Do you want just country borders or also "landscape/area" borders like in this file:World blank map.png
It will be really really hard to know which are correct and up to date, and to find an accurate source in svg. Please ping me, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Please get back to me any way, if you find what you want or not. There are so many ways to depict them so if you need new ones we have to define that, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
@Hispano76: I think we misunderstand each other. You put a lot of links to maps with administrative divisions and I don't understand why. You wrote before only "Only territorial borders" so why those links?
If you checked the links I gave you before and the maps you want can't be found there I have to understand what you want.
Do you want each continent alone on it's own map without the rest of the world?
Do you want each continent viewed as straight on as possible? E.a. Antarctic is often showed at the bottom of a map and not straight on.
Like in this map were it's mostly Africa which is shown straight on, the rest at different angels.
um, he had actually written a text re-explaining what the ip was looking for and what the ip is looking for, but apparently the new code editor 2017 deleted that part... I explain again and apologize. Goran tek-en
I think you misunderstood me or I didn't make myself understood. What I and the ip are looking for is a map of the state/provincial subdivisions of nations by continent similar to these threemapsof Europe. But for the continents of South America, North America with Central America and the Caribbean included, Asia, Africa, Oceania and Europe.
Although my priority (and I don't know the ip... :/) would be to have a map of the territorial subdivisions of North America that includes the Caribbean and Central America as well as Hawaii and Greenland. I already linked several maps of the subdivisions by country, it could be used as a reference to create a continental map of territorial subdivisions. Do you understand me?
@Hispano76: Thanks for explaining to me. Most maps have different projections so to move borders/territorial subdivisions from one map onto another is often an impossible task. Even those two Canada, United States are different and not possible to join together for a whole map. So I think the best way would be if someone who knows how to work with datasets/gis or something could do this. I don't have that knowledge.
I'm trying another way but it means a great deal of work for me but I will try it on North America and then we will see. So I will be back in a while with a draft. --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
@Hispano76: When I make a map I design it so that it will be legible at 100%, this is the only size I have some control over. I can never design one map so it will be legible at many different sizes. As I said before this is really complicated as there are countries with so big differences in sizes of it's administrative divisions and then it's almost impossible to join different maps. So it's a big complicated map both to make but also to take part of. I hope you have a good idea of how to use it as to my understanding it will be hard.
All sources for Greenland were very different in projection compared with my base map so I had to guess a bit there.
Goran tek-en I understand. On the map it seems good to me, I could opt for this design instead of looking for another one. As for its use, I had thought of making examples of population density at the state level, entities that have already had a woman in the position of state executive power, etc. You could fix it or make a second version so that different colors can be added. I'm sorry if I seem demanding. Hispano76 (talk) 18:02, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
@Hispano76: I don't understand what you mean by this "I could opt for this design instead of looking for another one." specially the word "opt".
So to see if I understand you;
This draft is okay for you and could be some kind of "empty base map". I will then need the following;
Name of the file
Description
Category/ies at commons to be able to upload it at commons.
You want another version were some divisions have different colors. It would have been god to know this before as many of the divisions are not an area by itself, in fact I have removed such areas as the had no use for the purpose you gave me before. It can be done but also this part can be extensive depending on how many it is.
You have to provide me with sources and maps are easier for me, not names of divisions. Get that and I will look at it, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:10, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
About that, I wanted something like this map of Europe but I no longer understood what you meant by other sources and maps, in that part I was confused, must be by my lack of experience in this. I'm sorry. Although I have reviewed the file, it seems that entities such as Alaska can be "colored" as long as they do not have intermediate lines such as rivers. But the colors are down 30-70%. Perhaps by simply removing the geographical boundaries, it can be solved and colored. Anyway, this wouldn't be urgent and you can take your time. Hispano76 (talk) 21:16, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Done @Hispano76: Is this done? If so please put the code {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} on this request so it can be archived, or get back to me with what you need, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 11:38, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Also, maybe Iceland should also be shaded light blue. Since the en:Icelandic parliamentary election, 2017 (held in late-October 2017), two parties that are arguably right-wing populist, the en:People's Party (Iceland, 2016)[3][4] and the en:Centre Party (Iceland), were first elected to the parliament. Most of what I read labels these parties simply as "populist", but both of these parties lean on the right, at least on issues related to nationalism and immigration, and right-wing populism is increasingly being labeled as simply "populism." This isn't as important as my first request, but I think it should still be done. --1990'sguy (talk) 04:10, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
This map needs more reliable sources in the first place. The only source attributed in the description is Parties and Elections in Europe which does not even label some of the parties mentioned in the map as right-wing populism. Add to that that it appears to be a one-man self-published website. I'd agree with your analysis of the UK though, but this Icelandic source doesn't look very reliable to me. De728631 (talk) 00:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
please create closeup map of the islands in relation to Newfoundland. The article has two long-distance maps which show them as specks… --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:04, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
I can't seem to find the above map ANYWHERE when I upload it to google image search, and unfortunately its not the simple 1-px-wide border system but national borders of varying size and pattern, and I'm simply not skilled or do not have the right equipment available to be able to expand said map down into the sub-national sub-divisions. Thanks! --Abbazorkzog (talk) 00:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
There is a mistake in N.2, the cities of Buenos Aires and Rosario should be purple "Sexual orientation and gender identity: all employment" --Yilku1 (talk) 00:32, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Additional locator maps for Luzon, as is the most populated island, which means there are more points of interest here than elsewhere in the Philippines.
Comment: Where is the source? I don’t see mention of Scotland in either article.
Comment: The gradient is confusing, nonstandard, and unaesthetic. A lot of locator maps for Norway will correspondingly need to be changed. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
A lot of work here. It is supposed to be the "replacement map" for metrication pages; nevetheless it has a lot of issues. There are no South Sudan boundaries; the color palette isn't the best for visually impaired people. I'm not good at all at Perl and similar, could you help me? The palette is shown in the second image.--Carnby (talk) 18:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
As per these sources ([5] - or jump to its map link - and [6]), it is quite clear that most of eastern Australia, besides a few spots, are not under the temperate forest biome. Sydney, for instance, mostly has dry sclerophyl and a few wet sclerophyl places, just akin to Adelaide and Perth. Therefore, it will be more appropriate for the region of Sydney to be under the Mediterranean biome. Furthermore, as you can see from these maps I provided, there are small pockets of temperate and subtropical forests to the north of Sydney. Also, the eastern portion of Melbourne is also dry sclerophyll, meaning it should be under the Med biome as well. I would hope that these are amended, as the original maps are rather fallacious and misleading. Thanks. --Meganesia (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
@Meganesia: I will help you but you have to be more precis, I have zero knowledge of this. Tell which map that should be edited and from which source and what to edit. Don't explain a lot that I don't need, please ping me, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: Sorry for the late reply. I didn't realise that I had received a response -- Is this case not open anymore? Anyway, both maps should be edited. On the temperate rainforest map (green-coloured), remove the colour over the Sydney and Melbourne region. On the Mediterranean forest map (brown), colour in the Sydney and Melbourne region as they have sclerophyll forests (which are a Med type, NOT temperate). Unfortunately, one of the source pages is now dead. So you can only base it on this one. If you are still confused I can provide you with an illustration (on how the envisioned maps should look). Just let me know. --Meganesia (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
@Meganesia: Now there are two drafts for you to check.
I would like an English version of the map using NATO military symbology. Additionally this will serve as a replacement for the original file which could be deleted as not public domain. I will provide translations and help with what symbols should be used to graphist. OpenStreetMap can be used for the source terrain. --Kges1901 (talk) 22:38, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
@Kges1901: I'm sorry but I don't understand, if there is elevations and terrain to me that is a topographic map like this.
If that is not what you mean please link to a map of the kind you mean.
I can't see/understand which part the original map is of the source map, remember I know nothing of this subject. Please provide screen print with a rectangle on it (or some other way) showing the area you want, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
@Kges1901: Thanks for that square it helped me a lot. Have a look this #1 draft. This is how it looks straight of, don't think about things sticking out or so right now. This is a moderna/today map with streets and other things, do you want me to remove something or add something, feedback, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: The map is excellent, but the area has changed significantly between today and 1944. You should use File:4th Ukrainian Front situation map 1 to 8 February 1944 northern half.jpg's placement of bodies of water and compare it with the OSM map to obtain the 1944 location of the bodies of waters. Otherwise, the roads are generally in the same places now as they were in 1944. Kges1901 (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
@Kges1901: Is it correct that the water bodies was much more narrow/smaller and there where wetlands on the sides 1944? I want to know for sure because there is some work with that and the source map is not that clear, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
@Kges1901: When we graphic workers draw maps we try to follow those map conventions so that we have some similarity between the maps. I have now a new #2 draft for you to look at. It doesn't look like the OSM map because of the conventions I mentioned. Really there is nothing left of the OSM map, too much had changed. This is not the final version by far, and I have had to guess quite a bit as I don't really know what everything is on the source map. I would like to get the overall background more lively but I really don't know what it is. Is it fields, sand or what. You tell what you want it to show, give me feedback on the hole map. Any feedback goes, just tell me, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 19:27, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: The area that isn't built up or wetlands is steppe. I have added the place names I would like added to the map here (pardon the shifting of the background, that was accidental) The places with place names on them that you have in green are actually also settlements. Kges1901 (talk) 21:30, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Spelling draft, this si for you to check the spelling as some were hard to see, also check if any more green areas should be settlements. The names are not in the final position or anything like that.
@Goran tek-en: Spelling corrections: Apostolov to Apostolovo, missing Malaya Lepetikha (east of the Dnieper, north of Velikaya Lepetikha) and Alekseyevka (north of Kapulovka), Nizhinye Rogachuk to Nizhnye Rogachuk, Pervemayevka to Pervomayeka, Ustikalka to Ushkalka, Manovone to Ivanovonoye, Blagovesh... to Blagoveshchenskoye, Batki to Balki, Menchikor to Menchikur, Peskochina to Peskochino, Alekseyevika to Alekseyevka, Verkooe Tarasovki to Verkhne Tarasovka, imen Chkalova to imeni Chkalova, Grushovka balka to Grushevka balka. The only thing that should be inhabited instead of green is Balki. Kges1901 (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: The base map is ok now. Troop positions can be started on now. Germans can be blue, Soviets red. For the map legend (key), the scale of the source map that I linked is 1:100000 or 1 cm of the source map is equal to 1 km. In the key, you can decide what colors represent troop positions on a given day. In the key, note that positions are at 07:00 on each day. In the source map, the key is in the top right corner. For instance, the first color to the right of "к 7.00-1-2-44 г" represents the troop positions of Soviet troops for 1 February 1944, and so on. Kges1901 (talk) 23:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
@Kges1901: There are so many different types of encircled areas, lines, squares etc and to me it's very hard to understand which type that shows what. Troop positions, battle lines, movements etc. It would help me a lot if you could mark out the different types and describe them on the map, hope that's OK, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:16, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
@Kges1901: I do have problems to interpret the map so now I will give you 10 different drafts to check. What I want is to get all the different areas, lines etc correct before we start giving them the final look. The numbers below are the different days.
@Kges1901: This is a template that we use when we do military maps File:Template_of_Military_Symbols.svg, is those the symbols you want? If so you have to help me which I should use where.
Two different versions of drafts; 1G without gradient, 1G gradient. Do you want the units names like that? This is going to be really really complicated with all eight days on the same map. For my sake (no knowledge of those battles) it would be very good if we can take it day by day and then we look at the whole info and see what we can do, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: I agree with you about taking it day by day, so first I will upload a version that has the first day's German positions complete. (Here) The symbols I want are the ones on the chart you linked. I would like the map without gradient, because the regiments should be displayed using the "III" regiment unit size symbol with, for instance, for the 570th IR, 570 to the left of the box and the division number, 302, in this case, to the right. For the HQ locations, you don't need the text HQ to the right of the box because anything with the vertical line coming out of it is automatically an HQ per your symbology. Also, there should be no 'x' over Schorner and the HQ in Dudchino is a corps HQ so use 3 'x's as shown in the unit size chart. Kges1901 (talk) 19:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: Here is a link showing the numbers that should be added for each German divisions. Attached is a link to the original map with the 1st day positions of Soviet units marked in. [8]Kges1901 (talk) 17:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
@Kges1901: Day 1 German Russian. I don't know how to mark when it's two units, tell me. I don't know all of the abbreviations you use so if you can write it in full ones. If you can write text for German and then Russian on separate maps it would be great for me, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 19:42, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: For two regiments you could put two regiment symbols next to each other and have the division numbers to the right of the box. RD = Rifle Division, RC = Corps. Rifle units are infantry. Units marked 'Guards' should have the abbreviation 'Gds' under the number. Kges1901 (talk) 21:44, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: Excellent work. Comments for Soviet units: the 416th Rifle Division should be marked as infantry - you have used the mechanized infantry symbol there. The 50th Guards should also be north of the 416th. 34th Rifle Corps should have 'Gds' below the '34', and three 'X's instead of four 'x's. 32nd Rifle Corps should have three 'X's instead of four 'x's. 3rd Army (4 X's) should have 'Gds' below the '3'. Thanks, Kges1901 (talk) 23:35, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
To me 416th Rifle Division is marked as infantry, I have encircled it with a green line on this draft.
I know the 50th Guards should be more to the north, I did draw a grey line to show this but that was not really clear. I have now moved around the units to make more room. This means some of them interfere with blue lines and almost other units lines. If this is OK for you I will leave it like that, tell me.
34th etc, this is were I don't have enough knowledge about how to show things. I assumed as there is a difference between units and HQ this also was valid for GDS. You have to help me with stuff like that and be a bit more specific, "both units and HQ" like that. I have never used those military symbols to this extent before so you have to help me.
@Goran tek-en: For the 32 HQ, could you decrease the size of the symbol instead? I'd rather that the symbols be slightly smaller than one of them have to be upside down. Kges1901 (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Apologies for my delayed responses. It's ok if the unit symbols overlap lines.
'GDS', the abbreviation for a Guards unit, should be standardized to 'Gds' - same for both units and headquarters. Other changes:
The HQ '5' infantry box and 'XXXX' should be '5 Shock' infantry box and 'XXXX'
The HQ '10' infantry box and 'XXX' should be '10 Gds' infantry box and 'XXX'
The HQ '9' infantry box and 'XXX' that is southeast of the 108 Gds should be '37' infantry box and 'XXX'
The HQ '3' infantry box and 'I' should be '3 Gds' infantry box and 'XXX'
The '96' infantry box and 'XX' should be '96 Gds' infantry box and 'XXX'
The '108 Gds' are a special case here - the place where they have 2 regiments (III) is at the beginning of the day, and there is a third regiment (III) moving up to the southeast, denoted with an arrow on the source map. The position with the dashed lines for the 108 Gds is the entire division (XX) at the end of the day. To show this situation, suggest drawing in the third regiment (III, infantry box symbol, and 108 Gds to the right of the box) at the beginning of the day with the box at the position shown in the source map, then with arrow heading towards the two regiments of the 108 Gds in the solid circled area on the source map. The two regiments should be shown by side by side boxes that each have III, infantry box, and 108 Gds to the right of the individual boxes. To show the position of the entire division at the end of the day (dashed circle area on source map), draw arrow from the 2 regiments position to the end of day position to show the movement, and keep the symbol you already have at the end of day position there. Kges1901 (talk) 18:30, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for making the information structured, much easier for me.
I have also changed the line around the end position to another type, then we can show in the legend that this is at the end of the day. This is just a proposal, if you don't want it, just tell me. --Goran tek-en (talk) 20:39, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: Some final comments on this day, before we move on to the next:
Your proposed change to the legend makes sense.
63, Infantry box, XXXX should be 63, Infantry box, XXX
The '259', Infantry box, XX that is to the northeast of the 32, infantry box, XXX and to the northwest of 34 Gds, Infantry box, XXX should be III, infantry box, and '259' to the right of the box
The '59 Gds', Infantry box, III should have '59 Gds' on the right rather than the left of the box
The '18', Infantry, XX should be '118', Infantry, XX
The '2', Infantry, XXX should be '2 Gds', the Mechanised Infantry symbol in the template of military symbols, and XXX
The II, infantry box, and '61' to the right should be III, infantry box, and '61' to the right
The II, infantry box below that should be III, infantry box, and '61' to the right
The '230' infantry, XX that is next to the headquarters of '9', 'XXX' and infantry box should be infantry, III, and '230' to the right of the box. Kges1901 (talk) 13:49, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Now I have added the different names and a legend. You should check the names as I'm not sure for all of them. As you can see there is a lot of information just for the 1st of Feb. I think it will be hard to have all of the days in the same map, probably we have to make different ones... We will continue and then we will see. Goran tek-en (talk) 17:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)--
For the 259th, I meant for my comment to apply to the other one. The '259' and 'XXX' should be changed to 'III', infantry box, '259' to the right of the box. The one that is currently 'III', infantry box, '259' should be 259, infantry box, 'XX'
@Kges1901: Draft D2_G_S.svg. I'm not sure how we are going to show the different movements per day. Right now I do one new map/day as it will be to messy to have everything on one, how do you think about this?
Now some of the Soviet lines cross over German so I guess they should be drawn back but you have to tell me what/how. Also check the legend as this is for 2/2. --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: We could do separate maps for each day's positions, and have them combined into one gif for the article. The German lines should be drawn back to reflect the Soviet advance, as shown on the original map.
The XX, 108 Gds can be shown at the final 1 February position for the second day, as we don't need the first day beginning positions on the second day map. Accordingly, the legend should be changed to remove the end of day symbol. Kges1901 (talk) 23:36, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: There are no German lines for several of the days. For the purposes of the map we'll just assume that the German positions are opposite of the new Soviet positions. Kges1901 (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: The map is fine except that the icons marking the day 1 positions of the units that moved on day 2 (2 Gds, XXX, Mechanized and 50 Gds, XX, Infantry) should be removed.
@Goran tek-en: I have reconsidered my original opinion has having two identifical symbols for the same unit would be confusing. As a result the southernmost of the 2 Gds, XXX, Mechanized symbols should be removed. Kges1901 (talk) 02:15, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
I did remove "2 Gds, XXX, Mechanized and 50 Gds, XX, Infantry" as you wrote that before and that made most sense to me, if not correct just tell me. I also made a change in the legend so the dates are in the same style. --Goran tek-en (talk) 12:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
@Kges1901: I'm sorry I don't understand. For me the base reference we have is Day 1. You are talking about original map but as I have tried to inform you, it's to complex for me to understand completely.
@Goran tek-en: Apologies for being unclear, but what I meant was the units marked in this image such as "Training (on left of box), II, Infantry, 54 Gds on right of box" and "Penal (on left of box), I, infantry, 54 Gds (on right of box)". Thanks, Kges1901 (talk) 01:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't know if sub units should be depicted in a special way.
I might have to many units there now, just tell me.
When you write info for me on the original map please don't write the smallest that smal. Can be hard to read depending on the background, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 16:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Here is a zoomed-in version of the crowded area with the unit that was invisible on the larger scale version; 2 (on left), II, tank, 37 Gds marked in turquoise should be added.
The front line is marked by the forward most (westernmost or leftmost) lines that are brown on the outside and blue on the inside. The outer most icons (1, II, tank, 37 Gds), (3, II, mechanized, 6 Gds), (2, II, mechanized, 6 Gds)) need to be moved east (right) to reflect that, bringing them closer to Konstantinovka (Константиновка in the screenshot linked in the first bullet point).
If the above – showing the units with the size symbol II – cannot be done in the limited space available, I suggest that you create an inset map that shows a magnification of the "crowded" area in the upper left corner titled 'Frontline of the 2nd Guards Mechanized Corps at 07:00', then add the subunits of 2 Gds, XXX, Mechanized (what I mean by this is ((1, II, tank, 37 Gds), (3, II, mechanized, 6 Gds), (2, II mechanized, 6 Gds), (1, II, mechanized, 6 Gds), and (2, II, tank, 37 Gds)) there. The inset map would not have to include the (2 Gds, XXX, Mechanized) symbol.
If an inset map is created, the front line should still be close to Konstantinovka, but (1, II, tank, 37 Gds), (3, II, mechanized, 6 Gds), (2, II, mechanized, 6 Gds), and (2 (on left), II, tank, 37 Gds) do not need to be shown in the "crowded" area, and (2 Gds, XXX, Mechanized) should be moved forward to the point that is slightly northeast of Konstantinovka where the map in the zoomed-in version says '2 МК' in red letters.
Add "(-)" below 2 Gds in the symbol for (2 Gds, XXX, Mechanized).
Add "(-)" below 54 Gds in the symbol for (54 Gds, XX, Infantry).
@Kges1901: Do you have any info on the German forces on the northern portion? I will adjust the german lines but should I just move the different forces also or should some of them be removed? --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Remove the large HQ marker for German 302, Infantry, XX and 3, Infantry, XX
A unit symbol for German 302, Infantry, XX should be placed to the west of the units with size marker III and 302 to the right of the infantry symbol
A unit symbol for German 3, Infantry, XX should be placed to the west of the units with size marker III and 3 to the right of the infantry symbol
Shift the German units to the north of the 302, Infantry, XX HQ marker to the south, so that 138, III, Infantry, 3 on right is northeast of 144, III, Infantry, 3 on right
572, III, Infantry, 302 on right should be to the north of 138, III, Infantry, 3 on right
To the north of 572, III, Infantry, 302 on right should be 571, III, Infantry, 302 and 570, III, Infantry, 302 in that order Kges1901 (talk) 23:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
@Kges1901: I have seen something which I think is a mistake. The dashed line we used to show troops on the first day is the same dashed line we use to show troops the other days also, or have I just mixed it up. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:55, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
@Goran tek-en: The link for 5-4 is 404. Regarding the lines, I think that using the same color in this case is fine because those units stayed in the same place for the period on the map, so they didn't change locations. Kges1901 (talk) 18:46, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
@Kges1901: The link works anyway now (checked in incognito so no memory issue by me), it might have been some temporary server issue. It's not the color I mean it's the dashes. --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:15, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
@Kges1901: I'm sorry I didn't mean to push you, I just didn't want this not to be completed.
Day6-1. I have drawn some black lines to show you what I have mentioned before. That the dashed line for the first day is the same as we use for areas (not front lines) and to me that is not correct. I think we should have another type of lines for areas after day 1.
@Goran tek-en: It is ok that it has the same type of line because those units (behind the front lines) did not change positions after Day 1 and stayed in the same place for the duration we have on the map. For the time being, you can upload what we have so far as I think it is adequate for the article that it will be on. Kges1901 (talk) 11:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Stale
European national parliaments with representatives from right-wing populist parties in 2016—in dark blue, those in government..png)
Done --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:23, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Europe time zones map.png
Europe time zones map de.png
Europe time zones map en.png
Europe time zones map fr.png
Europe time zones map tr corrected.png
Europe time zones map tr.png
Europe time zones map multilingüe.jpg
Map displaying orbital launches by country
Request taken by Goran tek-en (talk) 18:15, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Fatimid Caliphate Map in Arabic
Fatimid Caliphate Map in English
Fatimid Caliphate Map in Hebrew
South Sudan
_(-mini_map_-rivers).svg)
Map of the Turkish operation against Kurdish-held territory in northern Syria.
--Aladdin (talk) 07:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Map of 2018 bombing of Damascus and Homs released by the US Department of Defense
Comment @Mohmd1429 and باسم: , Thank you both for your efforts. Kindly note that the airport within Damascus Rural is "الضمير" (Dumair) not "تدمر" (Palmyra). In addition, Al Quneitra Governorate is on the western side of Dar'a, but in Arabic maps, it looks like on its north. One more thing, the word "الصفا" near Tiyas airport wasn't mentioned on the original map nor on its English wikipedia article nor in its Arabic one.--Aladdin (talk) 12:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Like.--Aladdin (talk) 12:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Map of countries with Stolpersteine
Current map
Map identifying New Zealand, its territories and associated states
Orthographic map (unlabelled)
Orthographic map (labelled with English and Māori names)
Mount Tambora
Request taken by KCVelaga (talk · mail) 09:14, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Color Argentina orange
Color Argentina red
Road traffic accidents world map - Death - WHO2012
Map of Gascon campaign of 1345
This map is messed up and doesn't display properly
This similar map is fine and may be a good place to start to fix the other one
Gascony in 1328
Gascony in 1328 (English version)
Europe, 1700—1714
Palestinian flag 1938
Internet access in percentage
SVG version of File:Vermont Municipal Map.png
SVG map
PNG map
Saiha district
Serchhip district
Mamit district
Lunglei district
Lawngtlai district
Kolasib district
Aizawl district
Image requested for translation (Political map of Canada.png)
2006 Somalia base map
Blank map of Europe with subdivisions as template
Range of golden jackal (please ignore red dots)
2014 U.S. House election results
Global superpowers in 1945
Legality of Home schooling around the world
New administrative map of Nepal
Nepal relief location map
File:Blank map world gmt.pdf
File:Blank map world gmt (simplified).svg
File:Blank map world gmt (more simplified).svg
File:BlankMap - World - Hellerick polynomial continent-based projection.svg
File:BlankMap-World.svg Already
File:BlankMap-World-162E-flat.svg
File:BlankMap-World-180E.svg
File:BlankMap-World-90W.svg
File:BlankMap-World-large2.png
File:BlankMap-World5.svg
File:NED worldmap 110m.svg
File:World map (Miller cylindrical projection, blank).svg
File:World map - low resolution chain test.svg
File:World Map Blank.svg
File:World map blank with blue sea.svg
File:World map nations.svg
File:World pacific 0001.svg
File:Worldmap-blank.svg
File:World V2.0.svg.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
File:Africa mapa mudo.png
File:Blankmap-Africa2.png
File:SVG-Koort Afrika.svg
File:Asia in Th.png Nothing to update here.
File:Asia location map.svg
File:Asia location map2.svg
File:Asie.svg Nothing to update here.
File:Les pays asiatiques - Blank.svg
File:Location Map Asia.svg Nothing to update here.
1st Map
2nd Map
3rd Map
4th Map
Borders of South Sudan
Option 1
.svg)
_in_Mexico.svg)
Blank Map of the World
example/style 1
example/style 2
Example/style 3
_(special_marker)_(-mini_map_-rivers).svg)
Right-wing populist parties in Europe, December 2017.png)
Map of Limosa lapponica subspecies migration routes
1. Color Tierra del Fuego
2. Change color of Buenos Aires and Rosario
Sortland Municipality
Kvæfjord Municipality
Nordland County
Troms County
Deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by DrMako. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
World Map showing metrication
Correct palette/South Sudan boundaries
This the Temperate broadleaf and mixed forests biome.
Mediterranean Forests, woodlands and scrub biome.
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_-_Nmbrs_-_monochrome.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
