Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Notting-Hill Carnival-Beauty.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Notting-Hill Carnival-Beauty.JPG[edit]
Romazur 12:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2009 at 21:50:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Romazur - uploaded by Romazur - nominated by Romazur -- romazur (talk) 21:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 23:48, 3 November 2009 (UTC)- Support Quality isn't perfect, but resolution is high and the colors are striking. -- JovanCormac 06:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, first of all for honesty! romazur (talk) 21:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Petritap (talk) 18:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Oppose she is a beauty, no question, and the colors are nice too but I don't like the extreme tilt. Really too bad bcs the scene in general has the potential for a great shot. --AngMoKio (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, thank You for above opinion, too - I accept Your point of view. romazur (talk) 21:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Econt (talk) 22:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop and too extremly tilt. Typical for the Notting-Hill Carnival are the afro-caribbian members and mainly their fancy costumes, but you reduced it to a nice face. What a pity... -- Ra'ike T C 09:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, typical for present NHC parades is almost everyone, probably from the whole world. Watching it live you may find out it's already transformed into a multicultural event. So, one is able to take a lot of extremely different pictures... Nevertheless, Your undoubtedly important remarks are being appreciated. romazur (talk) 18:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose as Ra'ike and AngMoKio. Maybe you have some other pictures like that in your collection? --Leafnode✉ 10:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I've got few more, but in my opinion this one is the most interesting... Thank You for Your point of view - of course - too. romazur (talk) 18:50, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Little quality problems, just too little for me to oppose. I very like the child looking in camera. --Phyrexian (talk) 12:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- I ought to say... at last! Little girl is cute, isn't she? When I discovered her on this picture, looking stright at camera, I started to think it is the best actress in supporting role I've ever seen. Pretty and misterious, as well. And what caused it? Tilt! :) romazur (talk) 19:10, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Tilt, bad quality. —kallerna™ 15:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Tlit was essential... Quality is everything what my compact camera can offer - I am only amateur in photography. Thank You for not long but concise statement, indeed. romazur (talk) 19:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Took me quite a time to think about it (tilt or no tilt?), and now I think the tilt is artistically valid here. But it's quite subjective. Overall, I feel it's an awesome picture (and model...!). --S23678 (talk) 05:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thank You very much for deep insight into the picture... romazur (talk) 18:30, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I want to see full costume. I think that a nice face is not enough for FP, especially with her eyes being closed (sadly, it makes the pic less interesting and lively for me). Also background could be better. And quality... Nice try though :)--Tired time (talk) 21:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Undoubtedly You have a full right of expecting to see nothing more but each one imagination of Yours. To be honest, this year there were parading several adult women I would be glad to see without any piece of costume... Unfortunetaly rules of the reality are heartless for daydreams :( Nevertheless, above expression of Your thoughts is important for me, too. romazur (talk) 23:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Per kallerna. --NEURO ⇌ 21:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- If "Per kallerna", ok - "Per kallerna": "Tlit was essential... Quality is everything what my compact camera can offer - I am only amateur in photography. Thank You for not long but concise statement, indeed." + I appreciate You were so kind to express some opinion. romazur (talk) 23:30, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Sometimes a bit of tilt does an image the world of good. In this case, it adds a dynamic feel, making you feel as though you're right there shimmying alongside her. Well done! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 08:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- That's right - in relation to the facts: this is a picture with content focused on the one particular moment of the NHC, and I was not going to "photoshop" it to get anything more but real portrait of true beauty. So, thanks for wide reflections on this "raw"... picture! romazur (talk) 10:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much like a snapshot IMO, sorry. Distracting background, tilt etc --Muhammad (talk) 10:23, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, thank You for Your opinion, too. In fact it is not graphics, so... romazur (talk) 12:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
