User talk:Petritap

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
I respond to messages left on this talk page here, or possibly on the talk pages of the users who left them, it depends.

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Boletus in Finnish forest.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boletus in Finnish forest.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saimaa canal at Lappeenranta Finland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The sky in the far distance is a bit white, but overall QI. Mattbuck 11:27, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Typical rocky shores of Lake Saimaa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition, QI for me. -- Smial 13:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Typha latifolia Finland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. Pitke 06:53, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lactarius-deliciosus-Finland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Cayambe 18:02, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hantala ravine in Somero.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:18, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake-Halkjärvi-Somero-Finland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not convinced about the colour balance --Mbdortmund 01:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pic was taken after eight in the evening as sun was setting. This is how the colors and lighting were at that time. --Petritap 06:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I see nothing weird, we have scenes like this all the time here in Finland. Pitke 07:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree the lighting is weird, but if this is realistic then promotion. Mattbuck 21:10, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Kiitos paljon[edit]

I enjoyed your photos a lot. I hope there will be more in the future even though you've been away for some time: you're missed! --Nemo 17:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie mille! I hope I'll be able to add photos in the future. --Petritap (talk) 09:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Petritap, I reverted to Plebejus argus ; Polyommatus amandus has a different layout of spots, weaker orange markings, and is also a much larger butterfly. Kind regards --LamBoet (talk) 22:00, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you! --Petritap (talk)