It is not too small, it is larger than review size (450pix in width, VI technical criteria are very low). But it may be the case that other pictures are more suitable for a VI. Anyway, VI or not, I still think it is a beautiful shot. --Eusebius (talk) 18:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know. Do you? Kidding appart, it is the proper way for buildings. This one may be unique, others aren't. So use the same scope template for related topics. Lycaon (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reason:
The background is unfortunate, but most other photos in the category are of poor quality or only show a small portion of the bird. -- Kersti (talk)
Oppose because of the distracting background that makes the head's silhouette hardly visible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by H005 (talk • contribs) 2009-09-10 17:31 (UTC) (UTC)
