Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2009/02

Erechtheum

View opposition Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2009-01-23 21:41 (UTC) Scope: Erechtheum Used in: en:Acropolis of Athens en:Erechtheum en:Greek temple ja:エレクテイオン no:Erekhtheion sr:Ерехтејон hr:Erehtej eu:Erekteion sh:Erehteion  Info Picture by LevineDS. --Eusebius (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)  Oppose I find the lighting not optimal, with the western side in the shade. What about this version (should be geocoded but as this is the same building, it should be a breeze) by Mountain? Lycaon (talk) 10:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)  Comment I didn't see it, obviously. MVR now set up. --Eusebius (talk) 11:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Erechtheum1.JPG: -1 <-- 3. Erchtheum from western-north.jpg: +2 => File:Erechtheum1.JPG: Declined. <-- File:Erchtheum from western-north.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 11:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View opposition Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2009-01-24 11:55 (UTC) Scope: Erechtheum Used in: Erechtheum Temple świątynia de:Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes de:Erechtheion de:Griechischer Tempel fr:Acropole d'Athènes it:Tempio greco pt:Erecteion es:Áptero fi:Akropolis (Ateena) ca:Acròpoli d'Atenes ro:Arta antică sr:Уметност старе Грчке świątynia hr:Grčki hram hr:Umjetnost stare Grčke sh:Grčki hram  Info Picture by User:Mountain. --Eusebius (talk) 11:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)  Oppose To strong noise reduction. (First version was better at this point) --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2009 (UTC)  Comment I think it is totally beyond the quality requirements for a VI (= picture from a cell phone). It is relevant only if you say that because of that, another picture is better suited. Maybe Lycaon and you (and any other interested reviewer) can agree on which version of this picture is the best one? --Eusebius (talk) 13:54, 24 January 2009 (UTC)  Comment I like the middle version [1] of this picture. --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)  Comment I prefer this version as the lighting is much better. However, as I slightly edited this version, it wouldn't be proper for me to vote for it. Lycaon (talk) 01:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)  Comment If you want to vote, I'm pretty sure you can: "Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it)" (quoted from right below) --Eusebius (talk) 07:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)  Support in that case ;-). Lycaon (talk) 07:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)  Support After spending again some minutes in comparing the versions of this picture, I will support know. --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Scores 2009: 1. Erechtheum1.JPG: -1 3. Erchtheum from western-north.jpg: +2 <-- => File:Erechtheum1.JPG: Declined. File:Erchtheum from western-north.jpg: Promoted. <-- --Eusebius (talk) 11:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)  Info: Reopenend since Erechtheum Acropolis Athens.jpg is very similar. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC)  Oppose The other version is better since the higher contrast makes it easier to see its features in review size.--Peulle (talk) 18:37, 2 October 2018 (UTC) Scores (2018): 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Erchtheum from western-north.jpg:<-- 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Erechtheum Acropolis Athens.jpg: +2 => File: Erchtheum from western-north.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File: Erechtheum Acropolis Athens.jpg: Promoted --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Helix pomatia (Burgundy snail)

View opposition Nominated by:  B.p. on 12:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC) Scope: Helix pomatia (Burgundy snail) Used in: da:Vinbjergsnegl, fr:Helix pomatia, nl:Wijngaardslak  InfoThis was another competitor in natural environment. And with natural light (no flash). B.p. 12:18, 11 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment I saw, but the orientation of the shell is not very good, even if the light is more natural. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC) Archaeo, is there any reason you didn't select File:Helix pomatia 89a.jpg here which you added at Helix pomatia? JKadavoor Jee 14:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment The orientation does not convey false information which the flash light in the other image certainly does.  B.p. 18:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment I'm not convinced by the argumentation just above, and this one "does not illustrate the subject well" enough, imo: I would like to see the Helix better...--Jebulon (talk) 10:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Scores: 1. Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: -2 (current VI within same scope) 2. Helix pomatia 002.JPG: +1 3. Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: 0 <-- => File:Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:Helix pomatia 002.JPG: Promoted. File:Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: Declined. <-- --Myrabella (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View opposition Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2009-01-28 13:12 (UTC) Scope: Helix pomatia (Burgundy snail)  Support Damn! Can't vote for mine, but this one ticks the relevant boxes. I would still love to know where it was found though... Lycaon (talk) 23:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC) The author could probably add some info about it, but somebody has to ask it in German. --Eusebius (talk) 06:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: 0 3. Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: +1 <-- => File:Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: Declined. File:Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: Promoted. <-- --Eusebius (talk) 21:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)  Oppose Definition too low --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:33, 8 March 2013 (UTC)  Oppose Per Archaeo.--Jebulon (talk) 13:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC) Scores: 1. Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: -2 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Helix pomatia 002.JPG: +1 3. Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: 0 => File:Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Helix pomatia 002.JPG: Promoted. File:Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: Declined. --Myrabella (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Natural History Museum, London

View Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2009-01-19 11:52 (UTC) Scope: Natural History Museum, London  Info picture by Diliff. --Eusebius (talk) 11:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)  Oppose Both have heavy perspectivic distractions but this one gives a totally wrong impression of the building. --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Natural History Museum London Jan 2006.jpg: -1 3. London Natural History Museum Panorama.jpg: 0 => File:Natural History Museum London Jan 2006.jpg: Undecided. File:London Natural History Museum Panorama.jpg: Undecided. --Eusebius (talk) 08:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2009-01-19 11:52 (UTC) Scope: Natural History Museum, London  Info picture by Stephantom. --Eusebius (talk) 11:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Natural History Museum London Jan 2006.jpg: -1 3. London Natural History Museum Panorama.jpg: 0 <-- => File:Natural History Museum London Jan 2006.jpg: Undecided. File:London Natural History Museum Panorama.jpg: Undecided. <-- --Eusebius (talk) 08:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Araschnia levana (Map)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Araschnia levana - Carte géographique.jpg	View Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2009-01-28 12:54 (UTC) Scope: Araschnia levana (Map) Used in: Araschnia levana Scores: 1. Thomas Bresson - Carte géographique (by).jpg: 0 2. Araschnia levana MichaD.jpg: 0 3. Araschnia levana 2 MichaD.jpg: 0 => File:Thomas Bresson - Carte géographique (by).jpg: Undecided. File:Araschnia levana MichaD.jpg: Undecided. File:Araschnia levana 2 MichaD.jpg: Undecided. --Eusebius (talk) 12:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2009-01-28 12:54 (UTC) Scope: Araschnia levana (Map) Used in: Araschnia levana de:Landkärtchen Scores: 1. Thomas Bresson - Carte géographique (by).jpg: 0 2. Araschnia levana MichaD.jpg: 0 3. Araschnia levana 2 MichaD.jpg: 0 => File:Thomas Bresson - Carte géographique (by).jpg: Undecided. File:Araschnia levana MichaD.jpg: Undecided. File:Araschnia levana 2 MichaD.jpg: Undecided. --Eusebius (talk) 12:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Cathedral of Learning

View opposition Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2009-02-01 16:53 (UTC) Scope: Cathedral of Learning Used in: en:Cathedral of Learning en:Schenley Farms Historic District he:קתדרלת הלמידה  Info There are a few other potential candidates. --Eusebius (talk) 16:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Cathedral from Upper.jpg: 0 2. CathoLearn.jpg: 0 3. Cathedral of Learning 02.jpg: +1 => File:Cathedral from Upper.jpg: Declined. File:CathoLearn.jpg: Declined. File:Cathedral of Learning 02.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View opposition Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2009-02-01 16:54 (UTC) Scope: Cathedral of Learning Used in: en:Cathedral of Learning en:List of University of Pittsburgh buildings en:List of tallest buildings in Pittsburgh he:קתדרלת הלמידה  Info There are a few other potential candidates. --Eusebius (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Cathedral from Upper.jpg: 0 2. CathoLearn.jpg: 0 3. Cathedral of Learning 02.jpg: +1 => File:Cathedral from Upper.jpg: Declined. File:CathoLearn.jpg: Declined. File:Cathedral of Learning 02.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View opposition Nominated by: Notyourbroom (talk) on 2009-11-09 06:26 (UTC) Scope: Cathedral of Learning Used in: unused Previous reviews  Comment Be aware that Stephen Foster Memorial is partially obstructing the Cathedral of Learning in this shot. —Notyourbroom (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2009 (UTC)  Oppose This is not a current photo and does not represent the structure in its original or current state. The Cathedral of Learning no longer has this coloration as the soot/staining was removed during a 2007 cleaning and restoration. The temporary fencing along the bottom left of the photo has also been removed.The base is also obstructed by the Stephen Foster Memorial which, to the those unfamiliar with the structure, might be confused as being part of the Cathedral of Learning. The plane to the top left of the Cathedral is also a distracting element. Crazypaco (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Cathedral of Learning 02.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Cathedral of Learning stitch 1.jpg: +2 3. Cathedral of Learning stitch 2.jpg: 0 => File:Cathedral of Learning 02.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Cathedral of Learning stitch 1.jpg: Promoted. File:Cathedral of Learning stitch 2.jpg: Declined. --—Notyourbroom (talk) 06:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Lacrosse

View opposition Nominated by: Yarnalgo (talk) on 2009-02-17 21:01 (UTC) Scope: Lacrosse Used in: Lacrosse, Sport, en:Field lacrosse, en:Johns Hopkins Blue Jays lacrosse, en:Johns Hopkins University, en:Kyle Harrison, en:User:UBX/Lax (userbox that's used on almost 50 pages), de:Kyle Harrison, fr:Crosse (sport), pl:Lacrosse, ja:ラクロス, it:Aquile Nere Lacrosse La Spezia, nl:Lacrosse, ru:Лакросс, zh:袋棍球, he:לקרוס  Request I'm afraid this image is lacking both a source (please fix that quickly!), a geotag and an "information" template, or some equivalent. Also, its size is borderline, it's exactly review size! I'm also bothered by the crosse of the guy being a little blurry on the picture, which is a shame since it is a key feature. This picture is interesting as well (but probably difficult to geocode, and not so sharp), but I think my favourite is this one, even though the ball bearer is seen from behind. Besides, it would be quite easy to geocode. What do you think? Additionally, would you be ok to make the scope simply "Lacrosse"? --Eusebius (talk) 21:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC) File:D1 Lacrosse.jpg looks really good even though it is from behind. Let me put an information template on it and geocode it and we could change the nomination. Also I've changed the scope to just "lacrosse" in case we go ahead with this nomination (was a little unsure on what to put anyway). --Yarnalgo (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Scope changed from Lacrosse playing to Lacrosse --Yarnalgo (talk) 21:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Info Don't modify the image in this nomination, nominate the second file separately and set up a Most Valued Review (MVR). Or tell me if you want me to do it. --Eusebius (talk) 22:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)  Info Done. --Yarnalgo (talk) 22:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Hopkins lax.jpg: 0 3. D1 Lacrosse.jpg: +1 => File:Hopkins lax.jpg: Declined. File:D1 Lacrosse.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Yarnalgo (talk) on 2009-02-17 22:17 (UTC) Scope: Lacrosse Used in: en:Lacrosse, it:Lacrosse, it:Roma Leones Lacrosse  Support This one is ok for me. --Eusebius (talk) 10:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Hopkins lax.jpg: 0 3. D1 Lacrosse.jpg: +1 => File:Hopkins lax.jpg: Declined. File:D1 Lacrosse.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)