User talk:UCinternational

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to the Commons, UCinternational!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)


Image deletion warning Image:Hilltop3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

howcheng {chat} 16:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Moving my Image[edit]

Thanks for moving an image I uploaded to Wikipedia a while ago to the Commons. I'm glad you felt it was good enough to do so. 24.187.25.51 07:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide the source/proof for the permission? Thanks, -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Please ask user:Kc0616 on en.wikipedia. --UCinternational 13:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Stadium-blue.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

I know you did not upload it, I am merely notifying you that it came from [1] Cheers, Iamunknown 06:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Run Sausages Run.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Alx 91 23:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Hi there! I am relatively new to commons, so I want to ask you if I'm uploading correctly. See here and if I'm doing it wrong I would love some pointers. Thanks Soxrock 17:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll make sure make the images I'm currently working on to look like that. User Chrisjnelson, as you know, did not upload his free use images here, and I'll finish up the ones that are still over there. And great job here at Commons yourself. Soxrock 13:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading[edit]

Hi there again! Recently I asked for a free use image from Wikipedia that I uploaded to Commons to be deleted, but it says that it may not pass deletion criteria. How exactly do you upload an image to the same name but make it able to be switched to commons from Wikipedia? Thanks again and keep up the good work. Reply as best you can, as I remember what you said before. Soxrock 00:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pointers, and your message was understandable for me. Uh, I wonder about the names, though. I don't undersrand that uploading an image to .jpg will change it on the main page. Sorry for my lack of knowledge, as I've said, I'm very new to the Commons, so I wouldn't know how this all works. :( Soxrock 10:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for your help. I want to understand this place through-and-through to make myself a better contributor at the Commons. Soxrock 11:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stadiums[edit]

Hi there again. While I appreciate your work and keep it up, I am currently downloading pictures from a few stadium articles in hopes of putting them onto Commons. Can at least AT&T Park, Busch Stadium, and Citizens Bank Park (the ones which are not on commons yet) be left for me (unless you already downloaded them yourself)? Thanks Soxrock 14:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate it. Soxrock 11:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for help thus far. I appreciate it and keep up the good work. When you consider I pride myself with 191 edits and you're over 1500 here, that's quite an accomplishment. Thanks for being cooperative and helpful and thanks for not biting the newcomer :-D Soxrock 18:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
P.S., what is your "best" language. Looking at your page, I don't understand "????????????ja??????????????", you know basic English, and nothing in Spanish. I've wondered this question for a while. Thanks Soxrock 18:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think you know more than "basic" English, I was just interpreting your userpage. I see that it would be literally impossible to translate japanese to english and vice-versa. Thanks for cooperating, even if it means speaking a 2nd language most of the time. I know basic German, may get a few sentences out of me. If I encounter a native German though, then I'd use a translator just because I don't want my message to be misinterpreted. Keep up the good work, UC (mind if I call you that? Your name UCinternational is rather long, and long names usually get nicknames). Thanks
FYI, I finished the baseball images, every free use image is now on Commons. Thanks for letting me do that, I just needed that "big" project to get myself adjusted to this place. Soxrock 20:51, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Quick heads up. Sorry that I haven't filled in the categories, but I don't know exactly how to categorize them properly (what category should they be in?) Besides, it would slow me down and make it harder originally to upload the images. Thanks for categorizing them yourself. Soxrock 23:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:100 0362.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

guerreritoboy 01:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Flag of New York Yankees.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

guerreritoboy 01:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Flag of New York Yankees.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Cards.larussa.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

I deleted this image because it's derivative work of copyrighted material. -- Duesentrieb 20:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:P2040241.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Duesentrieb 20:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:SluggerTheSeaDog.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

ALE! ¿…? 09:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Slugger,_Dudesleeper.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

ALE! ¿…? 09:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Tiger_Stadium_RF_Nov_2007_2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

75.119.29.75 02:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:TigerStadium_No_Seats_11_07_1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

75.119.29.75 02:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UCinternationalさん、

お疲れ様です。先ほど上記の画像をレビューしたところで、解像度がちょっと小さいと気づいたのです。ご存知だとは思いますが、画像が大きければ大きいほど色々な使い方がありますので、もし宜しければもっと大きいバージョンを再アップロードしてもらえますでしょうか?

お手数をかけてすみませんが、宜しくお願いします。 --jonny-mt 11:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Lacolis.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lacolis.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. shizhao (talk) 03:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Allison photos[edit]

Hi, if you upload images from this Flickr user, could you add the pictures to Category:MLB photos taken by Keith Allison? Thanks, Noble Story (talk) 01:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

date format[edit]

Hi, I think you should leave the date field of your (imported) pictures with simply the date in the American format (and revert this, for instance). First, the upload information is present already in the log and is not really necessary here. Second, the date in the American format can be parsed by the {{Information}} template and displayed in the language chosen by the visitor. Internationalization helps making users feel at home in this mostly English-based project. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 15:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:K arime.jpg yours or not?[edit]

Hello. Is File:K arime.jpg your picture? Your name is listed but I don't know why. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 14:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flickrreview nomination[edit]

I just wanted to let you know that I nominated you to be a trusted user so that you can review your own Flickr uploads. Check out your nomination here. --Yarnalgo (talk) 17:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You have not provided a reason for the rename, plus you have changed the language. Generally we need a reason to undertake a rename, and we also try to maintain the name in the original language. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Baltiravenfl.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Baltiravenfl.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Avron (talk) 14:27, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Baltiravenfl.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Baltiravenfl.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Avron (talk) 14:27, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boston Red Sox at Oakland Athletics 2010-07-21 category[edit]

Hello,

What do you mean this category is "too small"? I have lots of other photos from this game I am planning to upload and I don't see the problem of a specific subcategory focusing on one game during the 2010 MLB season. Do you feel that it is better for all these images to get lost in such a larger parent category as 2010 in Major League Baseball? There are nearly 500 images in that category already. BrokenSphere 18:51, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have created several categories to better organize several teams in 2009 and 2010, such as Category:2010 Washington Nationals season. In my opinion the Major League Baseball by year categories, especially from 2005 on, have too many images in them that could be better sub-categorized. This makes it difficult to find images to relating to a specific team in a specific year. Sub-categories focusing on a specific team by season make this a lot easier and allows specific wikipedia articles such as en:2010 Washington Nationals season to link to them. Over-categorization, such as by putting in an image in boh a team-specific category and in a year category is also discouraged. Having a subcategory that focuses on a team in in a specific year avoids this as it is more specific. If you take a look at Category:American football by year, you can see that there are very specific categories within the years by teams and games that prevent the categories from getting too large, which is what I think has happened with the baseball by year categories. Please take a moment to think about how it helps with organization. As these are attempts to improve the current situation, I would see reversion of these category creations and images out of them as disruptive editing, so if you have issues with this, please discuss first, thank you. BrokenSphere 22:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But it is regrettable that your contributions is unfinished. When you started Category:2010 Tampa Bay Rays season, you should categorize all Rays-related medias taken in 2010 before creating other team's category.

Anyone is more than welcome to do this for any team, 2010 or earlier. I don't have to do it all. Also, this is suggesting that I look through hundreds of images to figure out which ones relate to the Rays to do this. There's nothing wrong with starting a category. then images get recategorized into it later by other people or bots even, this happens all the time.
Since I took a few dozen photos of the Red Sox/A's I game, most of which I am planning to upload, I feel that it would be good to have them all in one category. First, there are many more than just 4. Second, this includes 3 categories together: 2010 Boston Red Sox season, 2010 Oakland Athletics season, and Baseball at Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum. Otherwise all these photos are spread out unnecessarily over 3 categories. This is over-categorization like I referred to earlier. The way the category system works here, it does encourage you to be specific. I am going to recreate the category and populate it with more photos. BrokenSphere 03:40, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Drew_and_roberts.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

VernoWhitney (talk) 03:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PNCPark77.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GrapedApe (talk) 16:27, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit[edit]

Hi, this edit makes no sense - you removed a category and un-sorted the others. I will revert to the previous revision. Regards Hekerui (talk) 20:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you move files to the Commons in a bad way. You put the original upload log in the description and omit all other info. I previously corrected File:Brandonleague.JPG but it was a lot of work. Please use the Move-to-commons assistant in the future. Hekerui (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio images[edit]

Just so you know, I've nominated a lot of images you transferred from Wikipedia to here for deletion because they were copyright violations originally uploaded by ShortstopVM (see your talk page history if you want to know which ones). VernoWhitney (talk) 00:46, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daytona Cubs and Daytona Dodgers Players[edit]

Hi, I have been attempting to group photos of former Daytona Cubs and Daytona Beach Dodgers players in categories. I noticed you have reverted several of my edits (removing the category, without explanation). Kindly explain your reasons for this, or cease doing so. Gamweb (talk) 09:02, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photozou licenses[edit]

Hi, You uploaded 4 images from http://photozou.jp licensed as {{Cc-by-2.1-jp}}:

I did not find evidence that these are indeed licensed as such, when trying to review them. Can you shine some light on this? Thanks. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 09:17, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for fixing my typo in the file name for File:Daniel Descalso 2011 Miller Park.jpg! I love the move tool available to me as a Commons admin and I wish it was available on the English Wikipedia. I notice that you had some type of sausage race message from several years ago. I have a bunch of excellent images of the sausages racing at Milwaukee but it looks like there are already enough. Royalbroil 05:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:LAColiseumStatues.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grcampbell (talk) 06:51, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC_0005_Lou_Santangelo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FASTILY (TALK) 00:43, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File names[edit]

When you upload files, please don't start them out with a bunch of numbers at the beginning of the file titles. If your going to put the date, please put it at the end of the tittle. Thanks, --Astros4477 (talk) 04:49, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Harvey please[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you have found or uploaded several pictures of Mets Pitchers. I just wanted to ask if you could perhaps work on getting a picture of Matt Harvey, to add his wiki article. Thank you.--El Mayimbe (talk) 05:54, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:World Baseball Classic trophy, 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA talkedits 07:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Images from Photozouはcc-byまたはcc-by-saのみ可能です[edit]

多くのPhotozouのファイルをアップロードありがとうございます。一部のファイルに非営利(nc)や改変禁止(nd)のライセンスのファイルが含まれていますがそれらはコモンズでは受け入れられないのでご注意ください。--Nightingale (talk) 09:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

失礼いたしました。ご指摘の管理者にレビューされていることに気が付きませんでした。私の誤りですのでお詫びいたします。--Nightingale (talk) 10:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Rickeysteal.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 17:47, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jontathan Papelbon Irish Step-Dancing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bluebird Blvd. (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zelous Wheeler[edit]

I don't want to edit war over this (at least any further than we already have), but how can we have one definition for who is a player of a team on Wikipedia and a different one on Wikimedia Commons? It's one or the other, and on Wikipedia, you have to play in a regular season game to count as a member of the team, especially considering how many non-notable minor league players appear in spring training games. Muboshgu (talk) 14:14, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

中村豊の画像について[edit]

File:Yutaka Nakamura.jpg における編集の件でお知らせに参りました。UCinternational さんは「これは阪神の選手の画像であって日本ハム選手や阪神コーチの画像ではない」として、Category:Hokkaido Nippon Ham Fighters players および Category:Hanshin Tigers coaches を除去されましたが、私はその考え方には同意しません。被写体の人物が元日ハム選手かつ現阪神コーチであるのは事実であり、当該写真は「阪神在籍時代」に撮影されたというだけにすぎないからです。

Category:Hanshin Tigers players を見るとお分かりいただけるかと思いますが、現在阪神に在籍する現役選手であってもアマチュアを含む他チーム在籍時代に撮影された写真(例:File:20111127 Humiya Houjou, infielder of the Kousei Gakuin High school Baseball Club at Meiji Jingu Stadium.JPG)や、阪神の現役選手時代に撮影された写真ではないが、かつて阪神に在籍していた選手なのでこのカテゴリに含められているもの(例:File:RE-Koichi-Tabuchi20110309.jpg)も存在します。他球団のカテゴリも同様の状況ですし、また File:木村拓也20040219.jpg の例では、撮影されたのは 2004 年ですが、2010 年没のカテゴリが付けられています。従って、人物の場合は単にその写真が撮影された時点に限ったカテゴライズをするのは不自然であり、被写体の人物のキャリア全体で判断すべきであると考える次第ですので、ご理解いただきたいと思います。

なお首記の画像については、編集合戦に発展するのを防ぐために、独自カテゴリを作成してその中に含めることとしましたので、合わせてお知らせします。この件に関して返信は特に求めませんが、もしご意見がある場合は、トークページのガイドラインに従い、私のトークページではなくこの下に続けて書き込んでいただけるようお願いします。Yasu (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

わざわざここまでお越しくださってありがとうございます。
YasuさんはFile:20111127 Humiya Houjou, infielder of the Kousei Gakuin High school Baseball Club at Meiji Jingu Stadium.JPGFile:RE-Koichi-Tabuchi20110309.jpgなどを例に挙げておられますが、それは「今現在そのようにカテゴライズされているファイルが存在する」というだけであって、そのカテゴライズが正しいのかどうかとは関係ないのではないでしょうか。それらのファイルが、実際はまだ整理されていないだけ、という可能性もあるわけで。例えばFile:Hoshino nobuyuki.jpgのように、オリックスのコーチ時代の画像だからカテゴリはCategory:Orix Buffaloes coachesだけ、なんて画像もザラにあります。そりゃまぁCategory:Hanshin Tigers playersの中に楽天のユニフォームを着た人物の画像があれば目立ちますから、Yasuさんがおっしゃるような運用がなされている、と思っても仕方ないですよね。でも、だからといってそれが正しいのかどうか。
また人物の画像でも、例えば件の画像におけるCategory:2006 in Nippon Professional Baseballのように、被写体の人物の経歴ではなく「いつ写真が撮影されたか」という情報に関するカテゴリもあります。中村豊についていえば、1973年生まれであることや大阪府出身の人物であることなどは、ずっと変わることはありません。しかし、どこの球団とどういう身分で契約しているかは時代によって変わります。つまり、Category:Hanshin Tigers playersは「いつ写真が撮影されたか」という性質のカテゴリだとも考えることもできます。ですから、私は阪神選手時代の画像を日ハムのコーチのカテゴリに入れることに反対するのです。
なお、File:木村拓也20040219.jpgの部分につきましては、何がおっしゃりたいのか私にはよくわかりませんでした。UCinternational (talk) 12:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
こちらこそお返事ありがとうございます。
人物写真のファイルをどうカテゴライズすべきかというのは、私の知る限り明文化されたルールは存在しないので、私の考えが絶対に正しいと主張するわけではありません。ただ、少なくとも私の印象では、単一の人物写真においては「写真が撮影された時点の立場」のみではなく「その人物のキャリア全体」を考慮したカテゴライズが優勢であると思えます。
もういくつか例示しますと、たとえば門倉健File:Ken Kadokura 2010 (1).jpg は、SK 所属時代に撮影されたものですが、サムスン選手のカテゴリも付与されています。野球選手以外でも、釜本邦茂File:Kunishige Kamamoto IMG 3322 20140110.JPG は、日本のサッカー選手サッカー日本代表選手自民党の政治家参議院議員の各カテゴリが付いていますが、この写真自体はサッカー選手としても政治家としても現役を引退してから撮影されたものです。2013年の衆議院議員選挙で初当選した新原秀人File:Hideto Shimbara Ishin IMG 5677 20130713.JPG は、その選挙期間中に撮影されたものですが、撮影時点の身分ではない衆議院議員のカテゴリに入っています。このように、私と同じく「その人物のキャリア全体を考慮したカテゴライズ」をする編集者が様々な分野にわたって存在するということがお分かりいただけるかと思います。
もっとも、明文化されたルールが存在しない以上、それでもやはり同意しかねるということであれば致し方ありませんが、今回の中村豊のようにその人物の独自カテゴリを作成するという方法には反対されないのでしたら、今後同種のファイルについては積極的に独自カテゴリにまとめていきたいと思いますのでご承知おきください。なお念のため申し上げておきますが、私の意見はあくまで「いつ写真が撮影されたか」の情報“のみ”に基づくカテゴライズをすべきでないというもので、いつ撮影されたかという情報自体を排除する意図はありません。Category:2006 in Nippon Professional Baseball のようなカテゴリの有用性は認めるところであり、それゆえ中村豊の写真においても独自カテゴリとともに残してあります。
最後に、木村拓也の写真の件がよくわからないとのことですのでご説明しますが、この写真は上述の通り 2004 年撮影のものです。「いつ写真が撮影されたか」という考え方のみによるカテゴライズであれば、論理的に言って 2010 年没のカテゴリが付けられるはずはありません(撮影された時点ではまだ 2010 年ではなく、被写体である木村も死没してはいないのですから)。またそもそも「XXXX年没」というのはその人物のキャリアの終わりを表すものですから、没年カテゴリが付いているということは「キャリア全体を考慮したカテゴライズ」であると言えます。ご理解いただけたでしょうか。Yasu (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
まず、順番が前後しますが、File:木村拓也20040219.jpgの件はよくわかりました。ただ私は「キャリア全体を考慮したカテゴライズ」も、生年や出身地などと同様に変わらない性質のものであれば、否定する気はありません。じゃないと没年カテゴリに存在してもいい画像は遺体写真だけになってしまいますからね。なお、File:木村拓也20040219.jpg2010年没のカテゴリを付与したのはこの私です。
Yasuさんは政治家なども例に挙げておられますが、スポーツの場合は厄介なことに(?)ユニフォームの存在があるので、どこの所属であるのかが一目でわかってしまうという性質があります。ですから、阪神のユニフォームを着た人物の画像日ハムの選手のカテゴリに入っていると違和感を抱く、私のような人もいるのではないかと思われます。
ただ、Yasuさんがおっしゃるように明文化したルールが存在しないのであれば、どちらが正しいのか決めようがありませんね。キャリアで所属した球団すべてのカテゴリをつけるべきだと考えるYasuさんのような人もいれば、撮影時点での身分を反映させるべきだと考える私のような人もいる、としか言いようがありません。
丁寧なご説明を頂いたことについて、感謝申し上げます。ありがとうございました。UCinternational (talk) 13:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
木村拓也の写真に没年カテゴリを加えたのが UCinternational さんご自身だったことは確認していませんでした。大変失礼しました。
ただ、私の意見に同意はされないまでも、このような考え方をする人もいるということに対してご理解いただけたことはありがたく思います。先に述べた通り、該当するファイルはその人物の独自カテゴリにまとめることが当面の妥協案になるかと思いますので、UCinternational さんもカテゴリ作成にご協力いただければ幸いです。こちらこそ今回はありがとうございました。Yasu (talk) 14:58, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:141026-F-XX000-001 Travis Airman sings at the World Series.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:141026-F-GU451-013 Travis Airman sings at the World Series.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Revent (talk) 05:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

[2] why change cats. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:08, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yangervis Solarte (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Muboshgu (talk) 23:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

カテゴリーの削除について[edit]

はじめまして、DAJFと申します。 File:20151128 Kouki Aoyagi of the Yokohama DeNA BayStars, at Yokohama Stadium.JPGについてですが、3つのカテゴリー(「November 2014 in Japan」・「Photographs taken on 2014-11-28」・「Taken with Canon EOS 500D」)を二度と削除した理由は何かありますか? 有効なカテゴリーに見えますが、削除した理由を是非教えていただければと思います。また、英語の説明文には文章になっていない場合は、最後にピリオドを付けるのは間違いなんです。(日本語とは違います)  お返事をお待ちしております。 --DAJF (talk) 13:39, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

度々失礼します。上記の画像のEXIFデータによりますと、2014年で撮影した写真の様ですが、これが間違えであれば、カテゴリーを削除しないで、適当に合わせたいただいた方がよいではないでしょうか? --DAJF (talk) 13:42, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped Images[edit]

Please upload images from Flickr, wait for FlickreviewR to review them, then crop images using Commons:CropTool. Thanks Elisfkc (talk) 12:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What a nonsense step! I have never seen such a foolish license review in my 10-year Commons career. --UCinternational (talk) 13:00, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Apologies for butting in, but uploading the original image first is actually good practice if you stop to think about it. Firstly, it enables the FlickreviewR bot to review the image automatically, as mentioned by Elisfkc above. If you only upload a cropped or otherwise altered version, it will fail the automated review and so have to be reviewed manually by a reviewer, whose time could be put to better use elsewhere. Secondly, uploading the original image first means that the entire image is retained for posterity on Wikimedia Commons even if the original (Flickr) image is subsequently deleted, so if someone in the future wants to crop the image differently or maybe extract a different part of the image, all the information is right here on Commons. I hope this clarifies the situation. --DAJF (talk) 00:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, I would ask that you upload the originals and then crop using Commons:CropTool. As @DAJF said, your choice to upload the cropped image without using CropTool is causing a lot of wasted time for license reviewers by contributing to the backlog on Category:Flickr images needing human review. You do a great job cropping them, but your method causes a lot of headaches for us reviewers. It also means you have to download and upload the images, rather than just using a tool online that would be faster for you as well. Elisfkc (talk) 17:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you have a headache, get some rest. Editing in wikimedia project is volunteer and not imposition. Thank you for your great works. --UCinternational (talk) 10:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring[edit]

Please stop edit warring on Category:Orbit (mascot). Thanks. Evrik (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to stop edit war? You should stop improper categorization. --UCinternational (talk) 11:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop edit warring. The categorization is correct. Evrik (talk) 15:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not correct. Your edits are typical over-categorization. --UCinternational (talk) 21:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Now the point is moot.Evrik (talk) 16:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-wiki linking of categories through Wikidata[edit]

Hi, could you please stop adding links on categories to their respective wikis? While it is helpful to link them, you are linking them the incorrect way. You're supposed to link them through Wikidata on the left side of the page rather than by entering the text onto the page itself. - Bossanoven (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please learn how to link them properly and then proceed? - Bossanoven (talk) 00:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reject your request. Article and Category are different namespaces. wikidata:Q1047714 should be linked to Mark Reynolds (baseball), not Category:Mark Reynolds (baseball). --UCinternational (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the categories on the Commons will never have a gallery because there are simply not enough images within the category. Therefore, we generally link the category. Mark Reynolds might have one someday, but most never will. We can change Mark Reynolds if or when he actually does have a gallery.- Bossanoven (talk) 01:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shawon Dunston?[edit]

Is this Shawon Dunston next to J.T. Snow in this photograph you've transferred to the Commons: File:J. T. Snow.jpg? - Bossanoven (talk) 15:45, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Barrett[edit]

Why did you remove catchers from Michael Barrett? - Bossanoven (talk) 10:02, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your misuse of categories[edit]

Hi, it is established Commons policy (read here: Commons:Categories#For more appropriate categorization) to categorize pages by their subject, not their contents. - Bossanoven (talk) 10:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please revert your edits? - Bossanoven (talk) 10:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For example, Ichiro Suzuki pitched one inning on October 4, 2015. Do you add Category:Pitchers (baseball) to Category:Ichiro Suzuki? I'm not sure how many games is enough to add position category to player category. --UCinternational (talk) 10:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I wouldn't add pitchers for a position player who has pitched one inning in his career. For professional athletes playing in leagues in North America, it might be for the best to model the categories after the English Wikipedia. - Bossanoven (talk) 10:33, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If there were an image of Ichiro pitching, that might be an exception to the policy. - Bossanoven (talk) 10:40, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You say you "wouldn't add pitchers for a position player who has pitched one inning in his career." Christian Bethancourt took mound two times this year, and Ryan Raburn threw in multiple seasons (2013 and 2015). How many seasons, games or innings are required? I want to know Commons' policy, not your opinion.
Referring English Wikipedia is unsuitable because enwiki itself says "content from websites whose content is largely user-generated is also generally unacceptable" source, and "sites with user-generated content include (...) most wikis including Wikipedia". --UCinternational (talk) 11:21, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A person, who search for a image of Michael Barrett with Blue Jays, found Category:Michael Barrett (baseball player) in Category:Toronto Blue Jays players. He/she will expect there is what you're looking for in the category. But a few seconds later, he/she will be disappointed because there are not any files of Barrett with Blue Jays, and feel deceived. Commons editors think "Oh, stupid falls for us again LOL." What a malicious project... --UCinternational (talk) 12:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

--Ralth Galth (talk) 09:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 08:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 08:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSCF7299 Entaro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 23:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:2004 WorldSeries Trophy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Levdr1lp / talk 22:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Our little edit-war on Miho Takagi[edit]

Hello UCinternational. I noticed your reverts on my reverts for the subject of the current (2018) world champion in long track speed skating Miho Takagi. So I asked of the best use for the {{Wikidata Infobox}}-template at the template-creators talk page here, just for your and my info.

Best regards Migrant (talk) 13:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any comments on this subject ? Beast regards Migrant (talk) 11:52, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright status[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one of your recent file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit war[edit]

Deutsch  English  français  italiano  magyar  português  sicilianu  русский  日本語  +/−


You currently appear to be participating in an edit war (at Category:Miho Takagi). Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andruw Jones.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Denniscabrams (talk) 02:05, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum scoreboard 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trevor Time (8).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo[edit]

This photo must be wrong. He is not left-handed. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yu_Darvish_on_June_30,_2014.jpg

--2604:2000:E010:1100:257D:B6FA:1C07:B71 08:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNHlR3v6cms :P --UCinternational (talk) 13:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:911YankeeMonument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chris Perez 8-30-09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Denniscabrams (talk) 15:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:田馬場貴裕.jpg 復元依頼[edit]

こちらの写真は私が撮影したものです。本人にも同じものを渡しているので当然使用しています。何を証明したら復活してもらえるのでしょうか? 楊志高 (talk) 15:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


File:Halvor Egner Granerud (NOR) 2017 (cropped).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G7 (Author or uploader request deletion))

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Ailura.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 07:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Atokuma さんがアップロードした画像について[edit]

User:Atokuma さんがアップロードした画像について、UCinternationalさんは template:No source since を貼付していました。そのうち3点について、私はグーグル画像検索を行いましたが一致した画像はありませんでした。

以上によりあなたのテンプレート貼付は取り消しました。3点のファイルには exifデータがありその3点に矛盾はありません。以上、私が指摘したことについて反論があればここにご返事ください。--Krorokeroro (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:おにクル6F ぶっくぱーく.jpg についても同様に template:No source since を除去しました。--Krorokeroro (talk) 21:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Atokumaさんがアップロードしたファイルのうち、「File:おにクル外観北西.jpg」「 File:おにクルぶっくぱーく6階.jpg」「File:おにクルわっくる.jpg」「File:おにクルもっくる.jpg」の4ファイルがCopyvioで即時削除済みです。残るファイルについて疑わしいと考えるのは当然ではないでしょうか。--UCinternational (talk) 02:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
疑わしいと考えるのは当然でしょう。私も即時削除された画像をアップロードした利用者はまた著作権侵害をしているのではないかと疑います。しかし、削除された画像と僅かでも異なる箇所があれば手間を惜しんでも検索して調べます。私はそうしています。UCinternationalさんはそうしないのでしょうか?私はUser:Atokuma さんの最初のアップロードは見ていないので知りませんが、今回のアップロードは検索した結果ネットで同じ画像を見つけられませんでした。UCinternationalさんは見つけられたのでしょうから、URLをお示しください。「反論があれば」というのはそういうことです。--Krorokeroro (talk) 04:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
検索して見つけられれば{{Copyvio|source=xxx}}で有無を言わさず即時削除でしょう。そうじゃないからno sourceで削除まで1週間の猶予をみているわけです。そういうところも読み取れずに「手間を惜しんでも検索して調べます。私はそうしています。UCinternationalさんはそうしないのでしょうか?」なんてドヤ顔が思い浮かぶような鼻につく文章を会話ページに放り込んできて、挙句の果てには「UCinternationalさんは見つけられたのでしょうから、URLをお示しください」なんて喧嘩腰ですか。--UCinternational (talk) 05:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
no sourceではご不満なようですので、削除依頼を提出しました。ご意見のご表明はご自由にどうぞ。--UCinternational (talk) 06:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]