User talk:UAwiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, UAwiki!

-- 17:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, UAwiki!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:James-franck-fig-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:07, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Johnatgeld2.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Johnatgeld2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Johnatgeld2.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:05, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sid Vicious promo (crop).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

 Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Pony Ruiz.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pony Ruiz.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol[edit]

This is not Sunni Islam symbol. File:Muslim-sunni.png Please rename it. Sunni Islam refers to mainstream w:Islam.--Officer (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Daniel h wilson.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Daniel h wilson.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Diannaa (talk) 01:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:38, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token bda4c5e16651e76761d6d1adcd4928cf[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --UAwiki (talk) 04:07, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 05:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Estampas hispano-africanas[edit]

Hola UAwiki, en primer lugar quería agradecerte haber insertado en wikipedia imágenes que subí o categoricé. Creo que los artículos ganan si hay imágenes. Sobre moverlo todo a una subpágina, por mí no hay inconveniente, aunque creo que la mayor parte de las "tareas" están ya hechas, así que dará un poco igual (sé que hay un es:Portal:Ceuta y Melilla, pero también sé que está abandonado; si hubiese un wikiproyecto ese sería el lugar para trasladarlo todo).

No obstante, estoy más "preocupado" por tu comentario en algunas no estoy tan de acuerdo. ¿Me he equivocado con la categorización o con la identificación? Si es así, por favor, házmelo saber para corregirlo cuanto antes. No he estado nunca en Ceuta ni en Melilla y tengo que confiar en lo que encuentro por Internet y eso es no siempre preciso. En todo caso, y como ya te he dicho, muchas gracias --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:49, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

TUSC token 84ef079a26c5dbc7ecbb85ced6f03201[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Pokémon[edit]

Hola :D , queria decirte que ya hice las fotos / de aqui pero no se que licencia poner xDDD .-- Bradford12:56, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Jose Mari betis.JPG[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jose Mari betis.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 11:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OCHARPEN[edit]

Estimado UAwiki, severamente usted y algunos otros bibliotecarios de tan admirada herramienta, wikipedia, me han estereotipado y condenado según estos, para escusar, parafraseando la primera columna de wikipedia,su tergiversación de el significado "de buena fe". Perdóneme si esto suena mal, no lo digo con mala intensión, pero sería muy interesante saber porqué.

Parece que mi neofitado en wikipedia resulta ofensivo a los expertos, y para demostrarme mi inferioridad no se me podía explicar, que la página de usuario es para información personal o biográfica del usuario. Cuando habría la página ejemplo, no había nada en ella.

Pero por otro lado, si había tiempo para repetirme, y por ello, yo repetía pues me daban la impresión de vándalismo: que "no debía editar en tal página". Repetidamente yo preguntaba, porqué entonces aparece "edit" en la página. Pero con esto, parece, aprovechando mi ignorancia, se me hacía la cama de sucesivas acusaciones , para que según las reglas, cuando usted fue solicitado, me suspendiera , y definitivamente. Impresionante, ni Cristo fue juzgado y condenado tan rápido. Tres años se le dejó para contestar, preguntar y hablar.

Si estas lineas todavía les impele a hacer lo incorrecto, es decir, dar lecciones a personas adultas, que, hasta están defendiendo su propia dignidad de hombres y mujeres libres y valiosas, respetuosamente solicito borre todo lo que se refiere a mi de wikipedia en español.

Pero si de algo sirven estas palabras, entonces, asígneme o recomiéndeme un tutor responsable que me asista en informar sobre mi descubrimiento, el cual, es más importante para nuestra civilización, que nosotros, nuestros malos entendidos, y nuestras sensibles, pero dignas de respeto, personalidades.

Creo que está de más agregar, pero lo agrego, que el respto que todos merecemos sea apreciado, y por ello, me informe su decisión. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocharpen (talk • contribs)

el proscrito ocharpen vió TARDE LO DE COMONS[edit]

Estimado UAwiki, lo que me dices es lo que te dijeron? Lo confirmaste? No necesito que lo hagas, solo quería saber si era posible. Pues ya es tarde.

Pero si no puedes o tienes que confirmarlo, en aras de aclarar, en lo que estamos de acuerdo, desde que IGNA me borró, traté de contactarme con el, y fue imposible.

Lourdes fue la primera que pude contactar, pero estimé que ya estaba con prejuicios, quizá no pude comprender el disgusto que me causó la posibilidad de haber perdido mi escrito, y con damas, no es fácil recuperarse de una primera mala impresión.

Desde mi punto de vista te explico el disgusto que me causó: el borrado, después de un buen rato usando mal la página. Coincidió cuando presenté mi descubrimiento en público, en mi poderoso, en los medios, país: Panamá. Ya anteriormente han pagado para que esta información, la de mi descubrimiento, no sea publicada. Tanto interna como externamente.

Nuestra página, mía y de ustedes, sale de primero en el buscador GOOGLE cuando se busca "OCEANOGENIC POWER"; cosa que es insoportable para fanáticos que manipulan los medios de información.

Puede ser paranoia mia, pero, cinco bibliotecarios expertos, usando de repente, todo su poder contra un usuario: suena y se ve raro.

De todas maneras, lo único que no quisiera es que ahora salga una página vacía de primero en los buscadores. Si puedes borrar todo eso, te lo agradecería. Quizá abra otro usuario, jamás me gustó Ocharpen, quiero que sea OCEANOGENIC.

Si no se puede, me conformo en inglés, donde al contrario, usando también mal la página, me la arreglaron y trasladaron al sitio correcto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocharpen (talk • contribs)

OCEANOGENIC[edit]

UAwiki: Lo siento, pero la referencia que me das de buena fe, IGNA, al cual le tienes que decir que respete también, y los siguiente bibliotecarios, no la aplicaron. IGNA, no me permitió jamás contactarlo, esto es peor que irrespeto. El siguiente bibliotecario tampoco. Entonces, yo interpreté mala fe. Comprendes? Obviamente,desde Lourdes, que fue la primera con la que pude intercambiar, y los siguientes hasta ti, al ver mis borrados, según lo que dices, obviamente tenían que sentenciarme. Pero también es obvio que ya no me quedaba mas que darle lecciones de simple ética. Lourdes entendió lo de mi ignorancia, pero hasta mi historial ya no aparecía. Cuando borré y puse mi artículo nuevamente, lo hice de mis archivos personales, no de wikipedia.

Creo que esto ya lo he dicho, y comprendo que no te convenceré de lo dificil que es reconocer errores de tus colegas, menos de los propios; y dejo claro que no me convencerás de que me equivoco al pensar que procedieron mal.

Me temo, estimado UAwiki, que no me comprendas, y sospecho que ni siquiera te interese el concepto filosófico implicado. Eso si, te aseguro que dentro de 50 años lo necesitarás. Tranquilo, yo no tengo nada que perder. IGNA me quitó todo lo que a mí me interesaba. En atención a la mala fe de ustedes, que juzgué, y con igual derecho ustedes opinan que mal; y por respeto a la dignidad de todos, es que escribo esto.

Sobre mi artículo y mis intensiones. Tengo un escrito sumamente científico ya publicado. Del que quería comentarios y preguntas de lo inferido en el, de parte de otros expertos. En la revista American Scientifics me sugirieron que aprovechara wikipedia, y en un lenguaje más sencillo. Lo implicado, hasta en películas, pronostica persecución: hablamos de energía abundante, limpia y barata para todos. En Panamá, me están haciendo algo semejante, y no me quieren financiar el debate, ni las publicaciones necesarias, allí es donde wikipedia español, pensé mal, podía ayudarnos a todos. Pretendí que al mostrar el supuesto debate sobre la información suministrada, entonces podía darle confianza a no expertos en ese tema, pero que sí pudieran ayudar en el lanzamiento mundial, ahora si, de lo, supuestamente para otros, descubierto. Ya sé que ustedes no quieren, y no es mi interés que se diga que yo soy un descubridor. Estoy claro de que cuando se confirme ustedes lo dirán. Lo que busco es la discusión honesta de los enunciados más álgidos de mis deducciones. En el peor de los casos, lo más parecido que podría suceder en este sentido, es que un posible lector diría para sí, hey, se ha descubierto algo; y aún así, tampoco es lo que busco. Eso era y es todo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocharpen (talk • contribs)

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thanks for finding these great pics of the Pierces. I've added this one to all their articles, and I'll see about working the others in soon. INeverCry 22:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi UAwiki, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Alan (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:32, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Admin's Barnstar
For the help on es.wiki :-) Dэя-Бøяg 03:01, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear UAwiki,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Café[edit]

Hola AUwiki, gracias por responderme en el café...

Primero que nada le quisiera decir que no tengo camara digital, y las imagenes de mi gata fueron tomadas con mi computador, asi que por eso tiene una mala resolucion, y por la misma razon de no tener camara no podria subir imagines de los monumentos de Colombia... Bueno, eso es señor, muchas gracias y adios... ♣ Little Monster ♣ (talk) 22:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hola, muchas gracias x el link, si esque puedo ayudar que aquellas peticiones lo hare con mucho gusto de ayudar en este "mini gran mundo"... Muchisimas gracias y adios.

PD: Si, ya sabia que tu no me habias borrado las fotos [[File:}|20px|link=]]... ♣ Little Monster ♣ (talk) 00:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Usless descriptions[edit]

You uploaded several image of musicians but the desction is basically usless as we don't know who the subjects are. Most appear here. Please fix this problems for all your uploads as you likely the only person who will know who they are. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 17:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't believe those descriptions are that useless, that band has articles on cawiki, frwiki and itwiki, those are obviously band members. Descriptions on their Flickr stream don't say a lot more, just that band playing in 2007. I believe those images are in project scope. --UAwiki (talk) 20:29, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the descriptions (I have not checked them all) just state something like: Avion Travel 100 Piccola Orchestra Avion Travel in 2007 which implies it is the whole band, but the images are of different people and you don't tell us who they are. That's why I felt they are less then fully helpful descriptions for other editors, hence my request. Specific details would be better but if you are not prepared to do that, so be it. Thanks anyway for the uploads. Ww2censor (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Admin's Barnstar
Tienes una buena manera de contestar, he visto algunos comentarios discusiones. Saludos. Giovany Lara (talk) 03:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Meghan Trainor - Title.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

149.226.255.200 07:49, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:PanoTirana crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hangsna (talk) 17:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Language classification[edit]

Hi UAwiki,

if you upload Spanish diagrams & schemes like File:Esquema de dilución isotópica.svg, may you please put them into Category:SVG diagrams in Spanish?

Thank you very much for your uploads!

Best Regards, Forestmost (talk) 16:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no problem, done. Cheers :) --UAwiki (talk) 22:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Serge Andreani - Vandal[edit]

FYI: vandal limbox07 is now indef blocked on Commons as well. C(_) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saludos de Marrovi[edit]

Aquí no nos interesa el idioma español, tampoco el idioma español es un referente de consulta en commons, por eso hacemos las traducciones más pertinentes al idioma inglés, debido a que el contenido es para muchos proyectos en diferentes lenguas; esta es la forma como finalmente quedó Category:Municipal Hall of Tequixquiac, Category:Town halls in México (state); Gracias por avisar y espero que vuestra duda haya quedado alcarada, le mando saludos y un abrazo.--Marrovi (talk) 18:18, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
La traducción deriva del término usado en México, para palacio municipal o presidencia municipal; sin embargo el término administrativo en inglés es Town hall, lo cual es como una comisaría o el palacio administrativo de una ciudad.--Marrovi (talk) 18:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Estoy bastante ocupado, estoy subiendo nuevas imágenes y editando artículos, te pido una disculpa, no me ha sido posible hacer lo que pides; que bueno que ya arreglaste, son cosas tan sencillas que cualquiera puede hacerlo y me da gusta que colabores con el proyecto; como un gesto que solo nos distingue a los mexicanos, lo cual es la buena educación, me disculpo nuevamente por no haber hecho lo que me has pedido, eso es porque me encuentro bastante ocupado.--Marrovi (talk) 05:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akira Toriyama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Spiritofase (talk) 01:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]