User talk:Truu/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Uploading from Flickr

Do try and grab the largest version possible on the Flickr site. Better yet, why not use the Toolserver bot to do the upload? http://toolserver.org/~bryan/flickr/upload Tabercil (talk) 00:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Better, but you missed one crucial step: in the last screen of the bot, if you look at the Permissions box, you'll see it says there "You must then click this link to complete the upload." You missed clicking on that link which would make the bot actually upload the file. I've finished the various uploads, but you might want to remember that for the future. Tabercil (talk) 03:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:I Am... Tour 7.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 01:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Flickr reviewer

Hey Truu. Your request has been moved to Commons:License review/requests. If you don't mind, would you share what link directed you to that page? Thanks, ZooFari 02:03, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Files uploaded by me

Bylbyl (talk) 06:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Hello, i noticed you you tagged 7 of my uploads with {{no source since|month=July|day=3|year=2010}}. eg: File:Lierse lisp - tribune III leeg.png and 6 more files.

As the source and author of the pictures is mentioned ("Lierse sk" and "Lierse vzw"), i don't understand what the problem is exactly. Could you please explain why you tagged the files and which part(s) needs more clarification? I'll be glad to provide any clarification or further information. Thanks. Bylbyl.

RE:RE:Files uploaded by me

As you are not the author of these images, you should put in | Source = http:// the link from where you took those pictures, on | Author = you should put the name of the photographer who took the picture, the problem is only this. Truu (talk) 07:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


Bylbyl (talk) 07:55, 3 July 2010 (UTC) :The pictures are taken by the football club Lierse SK (in the form of "a member of their webteam", or "Lierse SK's photographer"), the rights belong to the football club. Lierse vzw is the legal entity of the same football club, and they are the legal owner and author of the pictures (vzw is some sort of legal entity by Belgian law and is short for "Vereniging Zonder Winstbejag" in dutch, which can be translated in english as something like "Unity Without Aim for profit"). All the pictures are available on the official website of the football club: website Lierse.

eg: File:Lierse lisp - tribune II + I.png is taken from original File:Lierse lisp - tribune II + I.png

So, according to me, i did put in the name of the author. I hope this solves the unclarity. Bylbyl.

Flickr reviewing

Hello, and thank you for your application to be a flickr reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. Congratulations! Please see Commons:Flickr images if you haven't done so already, and the backlogs at Category:Flickr images needing human review and Category:Flickr review needed. A helpful script for easy-tagging flickr images is at importScript('User:Patstuart/Flickrreview.js'); (which you can add to your monobook.js), and you can add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your work on Commons! :) fr33kman -s- 08:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Guetta images

Hi, I'm the uploader of the images of David Guetta which you nominated to deletion. I know they have Copyrighted status on Flickr.com but I contacted the author of the photograth (Chucho Ramírez) and he autorised me to upload this photo. The proof is that it's impossible to download the images on flickr.com, so he sent me them by mail. Also, I can show you snaps of the private messages he sent to me. Please, do not remove them. Greets, AMARILL0 11:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok, what you said is true, the image will not be deleted. Truu (talk) 13:39, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Source of: Porthidium nasutum Costa Rica.jpg

Hi, I just realized my mistake and corrected the source for Porthidium nasutum Costa Rica.jpg Could you please review the image source and license? Thank you. Arjuno3 (talk) 16:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Done, image accepts the Commons! Truu (talk) 17:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for flickrreviewing, but please wait for the User:FlickreviewR bot if possible and work on the Category: Flickr images needing human review instead. In this example File:Patrícia Abravanel.jpg i must point you to the very first posting on this talkpage #Uploading from Flickr, please upload the largest version, not the 500px thumbnail version. The flickrreview bot will upload it, su just wait for him. If you have questions please ask here, im watching the talkpage and can answer them. --Martin H. (talk) 04:17, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

OK no problem, I'll wait the work robot! Truu (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Flickr review problem

Hello!

You have reviewed this image. Licence is ok and the stated flickr source is ok, too. BUT: Before you review flickr images please be sure that the highest resoluted version was uploaded by the uploader. In this you haven't. Please go through the uploads of User:Filipei and check the images that you have reviewed and upload the higher resoluted versions from flickr as long they are still available.

Regards, High Contrast (talk) 21:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done I did upload the original image. Truu (talk) 12:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

FlickreviewR problem

Hi! i made a derivative work of File:Juan_Luis_Guerra2.jpg and File:Juan_Luis_Festival_Vallenato_42.jpg but FlickreviewR says no pass, help me please.

These are the derivative works File:Juan_Luis_Guerra2._adjusted.jpg and File:Juan_Luis_Festival_Vallenato_42_adjusted.jpg. Excuse me for my english.--Inefable001 (talk) 23:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done What you said is true and the problem has been resolved. Truu (talk) 04:50, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much man--Inefable001 (talk) 17:25, 29 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Marcelo_Adnet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 15:56, 30 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Mateus_Carrieri.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 16:00, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

panoramioreview

Hello. Why do you use a template {{Panoramioreviewunnecessary}}? [1], [2], [3]. Compare, please. --Insider (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

See this Panoramio review needed, I'm just doing what the page says to do. Truu (talk) 16:31, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Please see Instructions for reviewers. --Insider (talk) 16:37, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I understand what you mean. Truu (talk) 17:01, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

A file you recently marked for speedy deletion

Howdy. It appears you forgot to notify the uploader of this image when you tagged it for speedy deletion. I've switched the image to a full deletion request.--Rockfang (talk) 20:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Commons:Deletion requests/Files upload by user Truu have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Béria Lima Msg 22:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Se vou colocar todas as tuas imagens para eliminação? Sim, vou! Praticamente todas são violações de copyright e em algumas tu tiveste a cara de pau de "revisar" o upload do Flickr (que so pode ser feito por usuários cuja comunidade deu permissão para isso) para evitar que tuas imagens fossem apagadas. Vou sim colocar todas para eliminação, e fique feliz que não peço teu bloqueio junto. Béria Lima Msg 22:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


File:Mariah Carey in Vegas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Rockfang (talk) 10:10, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

he truu

i added the great pic with otis redding here. Under license i red this: This image, which was originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 22 August 2010(2010-08-22) by the administrator or reviewer Truu, who found that it was currently available on Flickr under the license All rights reserved, which isn't compatible with Commons. It is unknown whether the license above was ever valid. So you found it, can u give me the address pls. thx.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 15:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

This license was never accepted on Commons, see the licenses that are accepted here, All rights reserved is only accepts on the English Wikipedia and in some other Wikipedias. Truu (talk) 20:10, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Hii

i don't undestand why the file need be deleted because in flickr i can see the license and it's correct. Please tell me what happend.--Rrrr45 (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

See this list Commons:Questionable Flickr images, this flickr is listed this page and you know that most of these images have been deleted from Commons. Truu (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

RFD

Oh! You are right, I forgot it. Thank you ;P --Trixt (talk) 22:51, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

license picture

Hello truu, What do you want to delete the picture, look at this picture is the same and the same license from commons :Monique_Coleman,_HSM2.jpg, and license from flickr :www.flickr.com/photos/99019375@N00/378643674/, no reason to delete an image . --Kww 2 (talk) 16:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Kww 2 see the date of the photo in Commons, the upload was made in 2007 and probably their owner changed his license, the correct is ask the photographer if he changes the license of the photo temporarily. Truu (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Ok, There is nothing wrong, Thanks for the info .--Kww 2 (talk) 16:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello truu, When the Picture will be deleted ? --Kww 2 (talk) 01:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Usually the term is for seven days. Truu (talk) 19:01, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Autorization

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Ronaldo_Corinthians_centenario.jpg I have autorization to upload the imagem, why you want to delete the image?


Hi Truu, do you understand what Lucas lg54 wrote here in his latest response? I dont as I don't speak Portuguese. --Túrelio (talk) 11:58, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Túrelio, the user is saying it has a Flickmail with permission to use the image, but this email does not confirm the use of the image with such license cc-by-sa. Told him to try to get a permit accepts here the Commons. Truu (talk) 17:37, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 18:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
The licence on Flickr has changed see here- Lucas lg54

license gettyimages

Hello

What is the appropriate license for this image?Abodi009 (talk) 00:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

There is no license for this image because it's of the site Getty Images, Abodi009, you can't do the upload this image. Truu (talk) 13:29, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you TruuAbodi009 (talk) 13:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


Hi Truu,
why did you mark File:Happy Familyinfo.jpg as copyvio? --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Because the user withdrew this image from flickr and did not put no information about the image. Truu (talk) 19:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
But how do you know it was ever on Flickr? I know that he had initially added the Flickreview template, but there was never a Flickr link available, as far as I can see. --Túrelio (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

No one can prove that this image is actually from flickr, but I put the copyvio because the user did the upload of image claiming it was removed from flickr. If you want, you can remove the copyvio. Truu (talk) 19:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello Truu

Thanks for your message. I'm really glad to have one since it seems that my images are constantly erased and that some people don't even read what I wrote about it. I already had that discussion with MGA73 who had erased my first images from J. Chueca taken from Flickr: [4]. As I was saying somewhere on the new pictures (I wish people will read it some day and I'm terribly sad I will have the same problem some time soon since there seems to be a lack of coordination somewhere...) I have the authorization from the author (I wrote him before using his pictures...) and I wrote a part of his mail on my userpage. I have also sent the letter/authorization to the permissions committee but I still haven't received any answers up to this moment. I hope you understand how obnoxious it is to write the same message many times (and the time lost...). I'm afraid that if this goes on this way, I won't contribute anymore here, it's so bothersome to see this happen so often... Well, at least you were kind enough to tell me what happens not like the contributor I just wrote before you. Anyway, I wish you all the best. Thanks for your understanding! Capsot (talk) 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC) Would it be possible you all tried to work in unison, I see that the file you were talking about has already been erased, so what's the sense of leaving messages if other users do not even care about them. Thanks, I understand it is not your fault, you did it the right way, but well definitely (and unfortunately...) there is something going wrong here...

Capsot, if I could help you, I would help, but I can't solve the problems that exist here I only do review in the images that precision be reviewed, if I can help you with anything just ask. I wish you all good and don't give up of the Commons here is a cool place maybe you're unlucky and can't see this. Truu (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Shakira_Milano_Italy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Image Amalia

I think its everything ok with the licence in Flickr. Please review again. Regards. JoanL (talk) 19:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC) Image Here

Problem solved, it's all right now. Truu (talk) 21:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:Lindsay_Lohan_drawing.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch  English  magyar  português do Brasil  italiano  norsk  norsk bokmål  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  suomi  українська  svenska  sicilianu  中文(臺灣)  +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 21:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Shakira_caricature_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 18:33, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

file revision

hello, this file need a flickr revision, :
Upload the maximum size version. Geagea (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done I reviewed the image. Truu (talk) 23:09, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Cantiere navale - Genova.jpg

Sorry, but I made a confusion. This evening, I asked the right licence to the author. In case this file will have to be deleted. Good evening. --Nevertime (talk) 19:00, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

If you get a license accepted here, the picture probably will not be eliminated. Just a reminder, the image from flickr is not equal to that, stay tuned and good luck. Truu (talk) 21:52, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Somehow the upload bot only "half" worked for me. Thanks for finishing the upload.Verne Equinox (talk) 23:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Could you please revisit this image? I just got the OTRS ticket, and while it isn't usable I looked at the Flickr page and it's now tagged as CC-BY-SA-2.0. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done You're right, I reviewed the image. Truu (talk) 00:40, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Great, thanks! VernoWhitney (talk) 00:59, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Beyoncé_Statue_in_2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 12:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

OTRS volunteer have problem with your image review

Please have a look at this discussion,User_talk:Binukalarickan#Invalid.2FFake_OTRS_permissions_on_your_uploads. As this OTRS volunteer is not satisfied with the image review, and he believes that only an OTRS member can review the images...--Kalarickan | My Interactions 07:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Saving_Abel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.187.103.161 19:09, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi, how could you review this image without checking on the source website first whether the image is indeed allowed as a party image? Regards Hekerui (talk) 16:48, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. All the best Hekerui (talk) 20:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of authorised photos

Hi! I've noticed just now that you've deleted some photos I uploaded time ago because bots have identified them as unauthorised. Many of them are actually officially authorised. I did not forward the permissions to the OTRS but I uploaded them as image files. --Ycco (talk) 13:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Here you can find some of them:

Pay attention to copyright
File:Missy_Elliott.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Fixer23 (talk) 21:07, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Beyoncé and Jay-Z.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Karppinen (talk) 20:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Sandy Turnê 2010-2.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sandy Turnê 2010-2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Chaser (talk) 01:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Missy_Elliott_drawing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Courcelles (talk) 00:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Madonna_-_Sticky_and_Sweet_Tour_5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 23:34, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Madonna_-_Sticky_and_Sweet_Tour_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 23:34, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Photo

Hi, can you check this photo? Carmen Russo

✓ Done this image can already be used in Wikipedia now. Truu (talk) 14:40, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

thank you!, can you upload also this? Amanda Lear--79.52.82.86 18:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
I can't, unfortunately. I did the upload of this photo and now look what happened then, because of this I will not upload the image of Amanda Lear, sorry. Truu (talk) 15:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)


File:RuPaul.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Karppinen (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


File:Kat_DeLuna_2008-3_cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 08:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Truu!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC)