User talk:Szczepan1990/archive5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 1 || Archive 2 || Archive 3 || Archive 4

Do we have to delete this photo? The LH logo is clearly visible on it. --JuergenL 08:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you answer my question? --JuergenL 20:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from archive because there's no answer yet

Jef&Eleonore.jpg

Why did you delete Afbeelding:Jef&Eleonore.jpg?? I explained in dutch why I'm allowed to use this picture? And why deletion without giving me a reason for this in the first place? The preceding unsigned comment was added by Katrienhuybrechts (talk • contribs) at 11:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Why did you delete this page? Maybe you could have just put a working thumbnail of Image:New Jersey railroad map.png on it? Please consider restoring it, or at least sending me its contents. Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:09, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You told me not to upload airbus pictures.

From no on I will not upload any more images to Commons and so I will not do any more contributions to commons. I will consider removing all of my previous contributions including those images made by me.

Borgdylan

re:visa

osoba ładująca grafikę otrzymała pozwolenie na wykorzystanie grafiki na Wikipedii Farmer Jan 08:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Borg64

Hello, Why did you delete my image? The more stupid in that situation is that Borg64.png was a reduction of my own LCARS.png. Then both need to be deleted or none, doesn'it?

SerSpock 14:52, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 22:03, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 22:03, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 22:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 22:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you delete the Logo of Heracles Almelo? I thought that Logos of a soccer club are free content, aren't they? (--Smogman 11:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Logos are generally copyrighted by their authors. Szczepan1990 determined that to be the case with your image per this log, and that you had violated that copyright. If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know why this logo has been deleted. Could you please explain why you did so? I will try to do it better in the future Thanks a lot in advance The preceding unsigned comment was added by Atletico (talk • contribs) at 10:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Logos are generally copyrighted by their authors. Szczepan1990 determined that to be the case with your image per this log, and that you had violated that copyright.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

przeniesienie grafiki

Witaj,

podczas ładowania grafiki pomyliłem fotki i chciabym Cię prosić o zapisanie wczeniejszej wersji Image:Olsztyn-Stare miasto3.jpg pod inną nazwą, np. Image:Olsztyn-11 listopada.jpg.

Serdelll 13:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

¿Y tú de que coño vas?

Qué manía con borrar imágenes. ¿No tienes otra cosa que hacer?. Al menos, podías dar una razón convincente.----L Rioja 20:16, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Czerwony_kościół.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

EugeneZelenko 15:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dv?

Hello,

Could you please explain to me and everyone what you mean with "dv"? You deleted Image:LH-Senator and Business Lounge.jpg without any formal discussion (as far as I know) using "dv" as the reason. I would like to have it undeleted. I either did take the photo or uploaded it (can't remember). I don't even know the motif... Thanks and greetings from Germany -- Mattes 14:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete this? --JuergenL 14:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two questionable deletions

Hello,

In May you deleted Info:Argonaute and Info:Chassiron, without providing a reason and without informing me (I created these pages). They were and are still used on dozens of pages, which bear a red link.

Could you please explain to me why you deleted them ? They are used to provide similar informations for the same ship on several pictures, something I have seen done on many other pages. Even if there was a valid reason to delete these pages, you could have at least checked the backlinks and subst'ed them where they were used, instead of leaving red links.

Thanks, le Korrigan bla 18:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

to jak to jest z tym tekstowym logo, jezeli do usunięcia, to tu jest jeszcze jedno, na którym się wzorowałem, dając licencje.. Farmer Jan 14:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grafika Skacela

Cześć,

zapewne chodzi ci o to, ze wybrałem {GFDL} ? I dlaczego napisales: "Pomimo naszych prosb" jak napisales do mnie ws. tej grafiki tylko raz? Z wyborem licencji moze sie pomylilem (ale tego nie trzeba usuwac, tylko napisac, "Czy mozesz zmienić licencję"). I dlaczego ją usunąłeś, skąd wiesz, czy jest wolna czy nie? Plati 14:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ja mowie o grafice Skacela.. Plati 14:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
no nie wiem, na dysku twardym mam troche zdjec pilkarzy (jakosc taka sama, z panoramą) i nie wydaje mi sie, zeby byly nie-wolne. Chociaz nie wiem, znajomy mojego kolegi wrocil z Anglii wczoraj, to zapytam kolegi, jak to jest z tymi zdjeciami. A swoją drogą, to dlaczego masz podejrzenia, że zdjęcie ma copyright? Plati 15:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tak samo z grafiką Kubalajugador, a ta czemu usunales? Byla na Flickr. Plati 20:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A propos User talk:Prawy74...

Jak widzę, to Ty skasowałeś grafiki z obrazami państwa Houwaltów - 3 dni temu dostałam maila od tego samego uzytkownika (Prawego74), który napisał, że dysponuje prawami autorskimi do tych obrazów. Hmm, prawdę mówiąc nie wiem, w jaki sposób mozna by potwierdzić, że tak faktycznie jest, bo wydaje mi się, że taki mail od osoby prywatnej jest średnio satysfakcjonujący. Jaką stosujecie praktykę w takich przypadkach? Cancre 15:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

O to niby czemu, przecież dostałem pozwolenie i jestem na CheckPage'u. Osobne konto jest mi po prostu niepotrzebne, bo z AWB korzystam rzadko. Yarl TalkPL 16:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

adrcfornotelheiro

WHY DO YOU DELETED IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS ABOUT???

WHY ARE YOU SCREWING WITH OTHER PEOPLES WORK??

The file you've deleted is a logo made for a portuguese club which I happen to be one of the members of the board... I made the logo...So why are you destroying other peoples work???

Not to mention I'm the webmaster of the site the file is in....Do you even know the rules of wikipedia regarding image deletions???


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Confocalprinciple_numbered_version.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 10:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Confocalprinciple.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 10:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Coat_of_amrs_of_Equatorial_Guinea.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 11:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]