User talk:Nemo5576/Archiwum3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Nemo5576!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problemy ze zdjęciami MONu[edit]

Administrator Wikipedia Commons High Contrast zakwestionował dziś pozwolenie na używanie zdjęć MONu (na tych zdjęciach: File:Rys-med1.jpg, File:Leopard 2A4, M113, Bergepanzer 2A2.jp i File:Polish MT-LB.jpg). Pozwolenie to załatwiłeś, o ile mi wiadomo, cztery lata temu. Czy mógłbyś jakoś ten problem rozwiązać bo musiała najwyraźniej zajść jakaś pomyłka skoro nie było problemów przez cztery lata. Tu masz wyjaśnioną naturę problemu: User talk:High Contrast#What's the problem - SuperTank17 (talk) 19:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okazuje się, że twoje pozwolenie może się jeszcze okazać pomocne. Przedwczoraj wysłałem na permissions-commons@wikimedia.org kopię emaila z MONu z przed czterech lat i wytłumaczenie sytuacji i oto co dostałem jako odpowiedź:
Thank you for info. Bear in mind that till 2005 there were several changes of the
goverment in Poland, so we can accept this agreement for the pictures uploaded at
that time, but such the agreement is not valid for uploading new images from The
Minsitry of Defence webpage.


Z poważaniem,
Tomasz Ganicz
Z tego co rozumiem mamy więc pozwolenie na zdjęcia do 2005 roku. To może nie najlepsza opcja na świecie, ale zawsze jest to początek. Osobiście myślałem o skontaktowaniu się w tej sprawie z MONem, ale nie wiem na jaki adres email wysłać im zapytanie o pozwolenie. - SuperTank17 (talk) 10:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dwa pytania:
Czy masz na myśli Rzecznika Prasowego Ministra Obrony Narodowej, którego adres email to rzecznik@mon.gov.pl? Czy może Departament Prasowo-Informacyjny Ministerstwa Obrony Narodowej?
Chciałem też wiedzieć co sądzisz o moim emailu, który zamierzam wysłać:

Dzień dobry.

4 lata temu jeden z administratorów Wikipedii i użytkownik Wikipedia Commons, Nemo5576, skontaktował się z Centrum Informacyjnym MON w sprawie uzyskania pozwolenia na używanie zdjęć ze strony MONu. W odpowiedzi otrzymał poniższy email:

Od: Anna Klis <anna.klis@wp.mil.pl> Do: nemo5576@XXXXXXXX Kopia do: Temat: odpowiedz z CI MON Data: 3 czerwca 2005 14:55

Szanowny Panie,

w odpowiedzi na pytanie skierowane do Centrum Informacyjnego MON, uprzejmie informuję, że moga Państwo korzystać z zamieszczonych zdjec na stronie internetowej MON (www.wp.mil.pl) do woli. Jedynym warunkiem jest każdorazowe podanie źródła.

Z poważaniem

Centrum Informacyjne MON

W związku z tym chciałbym się zwrócić z uprzejmą prośbą o potwierdzenie pozwolenia zwartego w emailu powyżej. - SuperTank17 (talk) 17:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, dzięki ale ciągle nie wiem czy tobie chodzi o Rzecznika Prasowego Ministra Obrony Narodowej, którego adres email to rzecznik@mon.gov.pl? Aha i które zdjęcie powinienem wybrać do tego maila? To które zostało oznaczone przez High Contrast czy to które ty umieściłeś cztery lata temu czy może jakieś inne? - SuperTank17 (talk) 08:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, że być może zadaje takie głupawe pytania, ale jaka jest polska nazwa dla licencji Attribution? Wiem, że podbna licencja Creative Commons Attribution ma po prostu kod CC-BY, ale ty oryginalnie użyłeś innej licencji. - SuperTank17 (talk) 19:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pytanie nieaktualne ponieważ udało mi się znaleźć odpowiedź i najwyraźniej jest to... Uznanie Autorstwa...
Mam inne pytanie: W treści maila, którego mają wysłać posiadacze praw autorskich trzeba coś zmieniać czy zostawić to tak jak jest (chodzi między innymi o przykładowy adres strony, aa.bbb.cc/aaa.jpg)?
Tydzień temu wysłałem maila do centrum informacyjnego MONu. Problem polega na tym, że mi nie odpisali i teraz nie wiem co robić. Wysyłać jeszcze raz? Wysyłać na inny adres? - SuperTank17 (talk) 10:08, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How to source images correctly[edit]

Hello!

Please give exxact sources to all images you upload: Here you have an example you it would be correct. This according to the sourcing criteria of COM:L. Thanks in advance! --High Contrast (talk) 20:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:XM320-M4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

High Contrast (talk) 16:13, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

jak to?,przeciez jest tam napisane że udostępniam to wszystkim bez wyjątków tzn.własność publiczna -a czemu pytasz?--Muffi (talk) 02:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

spoko! ,swoją drogą wczoraj też patrzyłem na niektóre grafiki i niewyświetlały im sie licencje i źródło,a później juz tak :/--Muffi (talk) 16:39, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:EP09 CCMichalZ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bkell (talk) 23:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Także:
Bkell (talk) 23:36, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Wojsko_Polskie_Irak_DA-SD-05-12332.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Ceta (talk) 08:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, give a clearer source, so that it is traceable for anybody that the image is really from a US governmental member. ---A.Ceta (talk) 08:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nemo5576/gallery to kawał dobrej roboty ;) Natomiast brak tym zdjęciom współrzędnych ;) Zobacz w powyższego linka i zobaczysz jak to się robi. A do czego się to przydaje?

  1. Nie ma dyskusji gdzie zrobiono zdjęcie
  2. Po kliknięciu w geokodowane zdjęcia np. na google mapy mamy podgląd na geokodowane media w sąsiednich lokalizacjach (coś jak panoramio), a to pomaga ilustrować hasła.

Prawda, że gra warta świeczki? Pozdrawiam, --Hiuppo (talk) 16:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on Zabrze[edit]

Hi Nemo,

Giorgio writing. Your work of taking pictures of all the streets in Zabrze is simply fantastic. In every city someone should do the same you do. Cities, nowadays, change so fast that it's impossible, after few years, even to remember, if not describe, how they were. It's a matter of memory, of collective memory so consciousness. And we are what we are conscious about. I have lived in Poland for 5 years (in Warsaw) and I know how easy it is to wipe out entire cities in just a boom. Whoever it is that trigger the detonation: americans, nazi, soviets, speculators, politicians. In southern Spain, where I live now, it's even worst. In facts people here live as ghosts: they don't remember their past, demolished by speculation and corruption, so they cannot build their own-shaped future. Consequently they depend on what media are broadcasting. Nothing good indeed. Anyway if there are people as you there is still hope. Go on! Thank you so much for you incomparable effort. Sincerely.--Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 00:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjątka z Łodzi[edit]

Hej,

Może to mój monitor - chociaż oglądałem to na paru różnych - ale ogólnie Twoje zdjęcia z Łodzi są często za bardzo "różowe" - to znaczy mają za dużo czerwieni, a za mało innych barw. Spróbuj może coś z tym zrobić :-) Patrz: http://pl.wikibooks.org/wiki/Fotografia/Kalibracja_monitora_i_drukarki i http://pl.wikibooks.org/wiki/Fotografia/Edycja_koloru i http://pl.wikibooks.org/wiki/Fotografia/Zarz%C4%85dzanie_kolorem

Pozdrowienia,

Polimerek (talk) 10:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Romanian_Soldier_DM-SD-02-00499.JPEG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Romanian_Soldier_DM-SD-02-00499.JPEG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 18:27, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please add the complete source where you have found this image. This is important because there is no valid source recently. --High Contrast (talk) 18:28, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image transfer from Wikipedia to Commons[edit]

Hello Nemo5576!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! If you transfer images from Wikipedia to Commons, please use this tool. This tool retains all relevant information with correct sourcing and licencing. And by the way it makes file transfers faster and easier for the uploader.

Thank you for your support! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 09:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nemo5576. Could you please take a short look at File:Rifle FN F2000.jpg. Thank you very much. --M.L (talk) 21:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zabrze - dwie dzielnice "Centrum"[edit]

Zgazda się, ale można patrzeć na nie jak na całość, tak jak na mapie... - Ben4Wiki (talk) 11:15, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Niech Ci będzie... Załatwione dla Centrum i Zaborza. Musimy jeszcze poczekać na zlikwidowanie kategorii z tradycyjnymi nazwami (speedy delete). - Ben4Wiki (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Twój pomysł kategorii (lm) Streets in Dzielnica (Zabrze) mógłby pochodzić ode mnie. Te kategorie są jak najbardziej potrzebne, bo bezpośrednie wrzucanie ulic do dzielnic prowadziłoby do chaosu. Oprócz tego kategorie te można umieścić w "Streets in Zabrze"=>"Streets in Zabrze by district"... Tak, pochodzę z Zabrza, ale od długiego już czasu śledzę losy miasta tylko na odległość... - Ben4Wiki (talk) 22:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stg45M_Sisco.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.187.102.162 18:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AK-74_NTW_12_92.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

68.118.54.158 05:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:XM320_APG_0033.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.187.103.89 01:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zgoda MON[edit]

Witaj. Masz jeszcze tego mejla, co znajduje się na User:Nemo5576/MON? IMO powinno się to wysłać na OTRS, ponieważ teraz dosyć dziwnie to wygląda COM:OTRS pod permissions-commons-pl[małpka]wikimedia.org. Dzięki i pozdrawiam JDavid (talk) 22:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rozmawiałem z pewnym operatorem i mówił że OTRS przyjąłby tego mejla co masz w podstronie, więc może tylko trzeba zagadać by przekopiowano z tej podstrony. JDavid (talk) 09:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pistol IJ-70 Makarov.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pistol IJ-70 Makarov.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

rubin16 (talk) 11:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:PT91 tank.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PT91 tank.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:PT91 tank.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kelly (talk) 16:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jesli masz jeszcze tego mejla, warto by go wyslac to OTRSu, i nawet stworzyc specjalny szablon na wszystkie zdjecia z wp.mil.pl. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Niektorzy trzymaja poczte. A jak nie, to mozesz do MONu napisac jeszcze raz, zapytac sie czy maja kopie mejla (instytucje...). Jak nie, to o nowe pozwolenie... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Eee, znowu sie nie zmiania, raz wystarczy. A napisac mozesz, co ci szkodzi? Jakby sie udalo wszystkie zdjecia z wp.mil.pl. dostac, nie byloby zle :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:24, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:PT91_tank.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kelly (talk) 23:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pistol_IJ-70_Makarov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kelly (talk) 18:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Nemo5576,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:09, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Knurów[edit]

Haha, właśnie się zabrałem za kategoryzację industrialnych fotek, które robiliśmy z Pleple latem: Category:Knurów train station :) Przykuta[edit] 12:57, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Co nieco z Zabrza też: Special:Contributions/Przykuta
Fajne, dzięki :) Przykuta[edit] 14:49, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Walter togle-action shotgun 1870.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Walter togle-action shotgun 1870.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Bidgee (talk) 05:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CZ 12 1865.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:CZ 12 1865.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Bidgee (talk) 05:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Degtjarow mit DA-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 07:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Diegtariew DA 1.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Diegtariew DA 1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Diegtariew DA 1.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 06:46, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:L85_Endeavour has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Can you find out if this image was taken at the MAKS 1992 air show? Is it somewhere written in book where you scanned this file? --High Contrast (talk) 10:57, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcie lodowiska w Bytomiu[edit]

Cześć! Widzę, że publikujesz zdjecia Bytomia. Czy moglbys wykonac i opublikowac zdjecie lodowiska Polonii Bytom przy ul. Pułaskiego 71, ponieważ brakuje go. Pozdrawiam. --Lowdown (talk) 20:04, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:AK-74 NTW 12 92.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 22:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]