User talk:Llez/Archives/2023 (2)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus tulipa (Tulip Cone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gastridium tulipa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astralium saturnum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hastula hectica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Mister rf 07:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Lichtenstein (Württemberg) - Panorama - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit overprocessed on buildings, but it's still ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 18:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Lichtenstein (Württemberg) - Augusten-Bastion - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spisula solida 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spisula solida 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 06:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Lichtenstein (Württemberg) - Mathildenturm - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA left to remove. --Ermell 09:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 06:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

--Pi bot (talk) 07:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hastula hectica (Sandbeach Auger), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spisula solida (Surf Clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis jacnensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis jacnensis (Jacna Abalone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spisula solida (Surf Clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bursa lamarckii 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bursa lamarckii 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barnea candida 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barnea candida 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barnea candida (White Piddock), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echazquellen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:42, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echazquellen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echazquellen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:05, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barnea candida (White Piddock), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echazquellen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strigilla pseudocarnaria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diodora ticaonica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:26, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olivella fulgurata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karls- und Bärenhöhle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 06:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karls- und Bärenhöhle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 06:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karls- und Bärenhöhle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:13, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strigilla pseudocarnaria 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olivella alba, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crommium ponderosum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strigilla pseudocarnaria, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bremerhaven - Weser - Port 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bremerhaven - Weser - Port 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strigilla pseudocarnaria, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macoma petalum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:06, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crommium ponderosum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 09:25, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macoma petalum, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karls- und Bärenhöhle 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macoma petalum, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthocardia paucicostata 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly unsharp but I think it's still acceptable with the high resolution --Imehling 07:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cassidula vespertilionis (Bat Cassidula), shell, brown form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbatia obliquata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cassidula vespertilionis (Bat Cassidula), shell, banded form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus - Bad Urach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 1-3 - Bad Urach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments On the far left side there are some purple CAs that should be remove (see the note) --Halavar 16:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review and the hint --Llez 17:38, 18 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Halavar 19:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Oberamt - Bad Urach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macoma petalum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bärenhöhle, Sonnenbühl, Ursus spelaeus, skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acanthocardia paucicostata (Poorly ribbed cockle), right valve, spiny form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersches Haus - Bad Urach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus - Bad Urach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus - Bad Urach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karls- und Bärenhöhle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 08:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karls- und Bärenhöhle 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 08:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia obliquata (Oblique ark shell), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mesocibota bistrigata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersches Haus - Bad Urach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torturm Schloss Urach - Bad Urach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 10 - Bad Urach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siphonaria luzonica (Luzon False Limpet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mesocibota bistrigata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeughausturm - Bad Urach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beginenhaus - Bad Urach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mesocibota bistrigata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siphonaria japonica (Japanese False Limpet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:21, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:21, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varicospira crispata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you reduce the highlights a bit? --Poco a poco 06:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 07:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:14, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ra'ike 14:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marita compta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:01, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mesocibota bistrigata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lithophaga lithophaga 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lithophaga lithophaga 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Varicospira crispata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rapa incurva 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rapa incurva 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Athleta lima 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lithophaga lithophaga (Date mussel) left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lithophaga lithophaga (Date mussel) right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:35, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amalda monilifera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 06:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donax gouldii 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amalda monilifera (Necklace Ancilla), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 14:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Athleta lima, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donax gouldii 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancilla ventricosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:43, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax gouldii (Bean clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amalda novaezelandiae 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Collegiate church St. Amandus, Bad Urach, Prayer chair of Eberhard I, Duke of Württemberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancilla ventricosa (Necklace Ancilla), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax gouldii (Bean clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 08:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strigilla dichotoma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strigilla dichotoma 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 06:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amalda novaezelandiae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 06:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myurellopsis parkinsoni 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strigilla dichotoma, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 06:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strigilla dichotoma, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:18, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenagodus cumingii 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycymeris livida 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:10, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nymphenbrunnen - Karlsruhe 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nymphenbrunnen - Karlsruhe 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myurellopsis parkinsoni, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tenagodus cumingii (Scaled Worm Snai), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:51, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chama congregata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycymeris livida 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:10, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duplicaria badia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 16 - Christoph von Württemberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:29, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chama congregata (Corrugated Jewel Box Clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 13 - Eberhard im Bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Background should be denoised or stronger mask should be applied before sharpening. --MB-one 13:25, 7 May 2023 (UTC)  Done --Llez 06:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)  Support Much better! --MB-one 09:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
• 

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Strigilla dichotoma valves, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Strigilla dichotoma valves has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Duplicaria badia, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macoma balthica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macoma balthica var. nivea (Baltic macoma), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful and used - --GRDN711 (talk) 20:37, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macoma balthica var. nivea (Baltic macoma), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macoma balthica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Ermell 10:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gastrana fragilis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lienardia grandiradula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mimachlamys cloacata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clavus nodifera, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gastrana fragilis (Fragile Tellin), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 09:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mimachlamys cloacata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Composite image is a good format. --GRDN711 (talk) 09:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antigona lamellaris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Etremopa royi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eucithara capillata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope Lorax (talk) 00:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antigona lamellaris 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antigona lamellaris (Lamellate Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antigona lamellaris (Lamellate Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spisula subtruncata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vermicularia spirata 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vermicularia spirata 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spisula subtruncata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spisula subtruncata var. triangula (Cut Through Shell), left Valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:13, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spisula subtruncata var. triangula (Cut Through Shell), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flexopecten glaber distans 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:51, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erjavecia bergeri, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruthenica filograna filograna, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flexopecten glaber distans 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flexopecten glaber ssp. distans, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flexopecten glaber ssp. distans, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment In my reading of WORMS, "distans" does not appear to be a recognized ssp of the Flexopecten glaber species. Can you speak to why you think it is? I note you also have other shell images representing the Flexopecten glaber species as well - would like to understand the distinctions. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Controversial subspecies but which is accepted in France by IFREMER. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudodaphnella barnardi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support shows off the shell very well, is in colour as opposed to a few of the other photos. Well laid out so very useful. Scope is correct. Geocoding is unnecessary in this instance. Reasonable description. Good categorisation. Used in non-Commons projects, which is nice! -- Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laevichlamys cuneata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:18, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laevichlamys cuneata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winden - Rathaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winden - Hauptstraße 35 - Nachtwächterhäuschen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Altenstraße 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:54, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Prangertshof 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laevichlamys cuneata, yellow form, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:32, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Burgstraße 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:03, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Flitschberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laevichlamys cuneata, yellow form, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 06:21, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donax trunculus 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Kurpark 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Kurpark 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donax trunculus 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winden - Hauptstraße 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winden - Rathaus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drilliola turrella, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 06:41, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duplicaria spectabilis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Kunschdhaisl am Schipkapass 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Schipkapass 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax trunculus ssp trunculus (Truncate Donax), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info See also here --Llez (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 13:55, 5 June 2023 (UTC) =

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terebra argus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Schipkapass 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
• 

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Antigona lamellaris valves, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Antigona lamellaris valves has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax trunculus ssp trunculus (Truncate Donax), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Duplicaria spectabilis (Graceful Auger), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --GRDN711 (talk) 14:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:43, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donax trunculus 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Gerbergasse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Wassergasse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Terebra argus (Argus Auger), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donax trunculus 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Gerbergasse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Gerbergasse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Rissoina cerithiiformis

Rissoina cerithiiformis has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 11:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terebra babylonia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Prangertshof 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Gerbergasse 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax trunculus ssp. adriaticus (Truncate Donax), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Amandus - Bad Urach 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dicathais orbita 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Wassergasse - Schipkapass 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:49, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Prangertshof 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax trunculus ssp. adriaticus (Truncate Donax), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Terebra babylonia (Babylonian Auger), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donax trunculus 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 13:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Kunschdhaisl am Schipkapass 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 13:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Wassergasse - Schipkapass 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pilgrimage church Maria Hilf, Moosbronn, tabernacle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donax trunculus 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Wassergasse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Schipkapass 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax trunculus ssp. anatinus (Truncate Donax), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Wassergasse 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 14:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Wassergasse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MVmath20 11:35, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax trunculus ssp. anatinus (Truncate Donax), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --GRDN711 (talk) 06:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haustrum haustorium 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Stadtmühle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Gerbergasse 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Museum unterm Trifels - Wasserrad 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donax trunculus 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Am Storchentor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annweiler - Gerbergasse 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donax trunculus 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haustrum haustorium ( Dark Rock Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medora almissana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trifels-Felsen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax trunculus ssp. trunculus var. flaveolus (Truncate Donax), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strigillaria cana cana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Radomianin 08:18, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Medora almissana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donax trunculus ssp. trunculus var. flaveolus (Truncate Donax), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pecten maximus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Radomianin 07:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anebos - Reichsburg Trifels 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichsburg Trifels 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:St. Amandus - Bad Urach 18.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St. Amandus - Bad Urach 18.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pecten maximus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichts Felsen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichts Felsen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 14:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fensterfels 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA in the leaves left to remove. --Ermell 08:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 05:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strigillaria cana ssp. cana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis pulcherrima 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Anebos 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pecten maximus (Great Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigapatella novaezelandiae 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernersberger Geiersteine 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernersberger Geiersteine 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis pulcherrima (Most Beautiful Abalone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pecten maximus (Great Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --GRDN711 (talk) 12:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argopecten gibbus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:25, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernersberger Geiersteine 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernersberger Geiersteine 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:25, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sigapatella novaezelandiae (Circular Slipper Limpet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Megapitaria squalida 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernersberger Geiersteine 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernersberger Geiersteine 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cookia sulcata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runder Hut - Wernersberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runder Hut - Wernersberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trifels-Felsen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC) Visible violett chromatic aberration and license migration redundant, fixable? --F. Riedelio 09:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 11:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 08:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)