User talk:Llez/Archives/2016 (2)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cellana testudinaria 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 23:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cellana testudinaria (Common Turtle Limpet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful--Pierre André (talk) 21:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ocimum americanum (American Basil), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ocimum americanum (American Basil), Inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timbellus miyokoae 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 20:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Akebia quinata (Chocolate Vine), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Akebia quinata (Chocolate Vine), Male flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochlicella acuta ssp. acuta, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 00:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cymbula granatina 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard - Tiagua - 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymbula granatina (Sandpaper Limpet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farmer's wife - Yaiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania discors, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard - Tiagua - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania discors forma peloritana, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oenanthe crocata, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oenanthe crocata, inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oenanthe crocata, infrutescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochlicella acuta ssp. acuta forma gigantea, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 21:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochlicella acuta acuta f. gigantea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:13, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhinoclavis vertagus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast at Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caldera de Masián - Lanzarote - 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhinoclavis vertagus (Common Cerith), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patella depressa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Patella depressa (Depressed Limpet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agaronia hiatula (Olive-grey Ancilla), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agaronia hiatula 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting! --Jkadavoor 14:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Volva habei 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Volva habei 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochlicella acuta raphidia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochlicella acuta ssp. raphidia, pale form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could perhaps have been a little sharper or more contrast, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 15:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)  DoneThanks --Llez 15:50, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stosicia houbricki, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me as it is now! --Hubertl 06:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alvania balearica, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 00:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhinoclavis fasciata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhinoclavis fasciata (Banded Creeper), white form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochlicella acuta raphidia 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. W.carter 20:42, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochlicella acuta ssp. raphidia, coloured form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scutellastra longicosta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scutellastra longicosta (Long-spined Limpet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Topiary peacock - Mainau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sundial - Mainau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magilus antiquus (Burrowing Coral Snail), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salix alba - Lake Constance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 16:08, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magilus antiquus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think you are right. Nice work. --Ermell 18:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis ovina volcanicus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis ovina ssp. volcanicus, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theba impugnata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theba impugnata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Together in the Garden - Sjer Jacobs - Mainau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:48, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myurella nebulosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House - Bad Bergzabern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnolia grandiflora 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms - Hans von Trotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myurella nebulosa (Red-cloud Auger), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Together in the Garden" by Sjer Jacobs, Mainau, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:04, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Timbellus miyokoae 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Timbellus miyokoae 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turritella cochlea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms of Hans von Trotha, Berwartstein Castle, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Pierre André (talk) 22:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bedroom of Hans von Trotha, Berwartstein Castle, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turritella cochlea, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berliner Meilenstein - Bad Bergzabern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Problem in VI

Problem for me. file:Eumorpha obliquus MHNT CUT 2010 0 55 Guadeloupe male dorsal.jpg Thank you for your vote, but I forgot the full name of the subspecies in the scope. I had to change it. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turritella banksii 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. W.carter 20:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal - Berwartstein Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! ...and good quality! --Basotxerri 15:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passiflora eichleriana 'Mauro Peixoto', flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Beautiful image, very used. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Pierre André (talk) 09:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anemone pavonina (Peacock anemone), Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passiflora 'Adularia', Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turritella banksii, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthemis chia, Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The description would be better by including the binomial name in each languages, by example in order to get it displayed when the image is shown through the Media Viewer. (see also {{W}} and {{Wd}}) --Mathieu MD (talk) 12:30, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment There is no article in the English Wikipedia about this species (so it can't be linked), but there is an article in the German Wikipedia where it is linked to. --Llez (talk) 16:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
    • What I meant was, instead of current description, using something like this:

|Description=
{{en|''Anthemis chia'' Habitus; Ambelos Afhin, {{W|Crete}}, {{W|Greece}}.}}
{{de|Chios-Hundskamille ''{Wd|Anthemis chia}}'', Habitus; Ambelos afhin, {Wd|Kreta}}, {{Wd|Griechenland}}.}}

--Mathieu MD (talk) 18:44, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Done --Llez (talk) 20:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Mathieu MD (talk) 10:58, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthemis chia, Inflorescences.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passiflora 'White Mirror', Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theba gittenbergeri 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Berliner Meilenstein, Bad Bergzabern.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asplenium scolopendrium (Hart's-tongue), Sori.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Mathieu MD (talk) 11:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passiflora 'Purple Companion', Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. --Pierre André (talk) 09:06, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theba gittenbergeri, shell, banded form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potamides tricarinatus crispiacensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 19:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walther von der Vogelweide - Berwartstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Well - Berwartstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some red/green CA on several features in the room. Fixable. W.carter 19:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)  Done --Llez 21:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC) Sorry, still some spots left. See notes. After that it's ok. ;) W.carter 21:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Llez 22:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC) Nice! Good quality. W.carter 08:22, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passiflora coccinea, Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:35, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:58, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Berwartstein Castle, well.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:35, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Potamides tricarinatus ssp. crispiacensis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passiflora tulae (Mountain love in the mist), Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Berwartstein Castle, primordial access.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passiflora 'Byron Beauty', Flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:12, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chicoreus torrefactus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traction engine, Société française de matériel agricole et industriel (SFMAI) (1927).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support useful --Pierre André (talk) 14:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chicoreus torrefactus (Firebrand Murex), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:39, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support usefull The gallery is very beautiful. --Pierre André (talk) 14:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Waterloo Boy Model R (1917).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:07, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Case 12/25 (1916).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:30, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fibigia clypeata (Roman Shields), Fruits with seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minneapolis 17-30 A (1922).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:44, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natica fulminea f. cruentata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dugout canoe - Unteruhldingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caulophyllum thalictroides (Blue cohosh), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 13:48, 22 août 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theba gittenbergeri 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avery 45-65 (1923).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:52, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MWM Motorpferd (1925).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:59, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 20:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Natica fulminea forma cruentata (Lightning Moon Snail), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 20:55, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caulophyllum thalictroides (Blue cohosh), fruits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Usefull Olivier LPB (talk) 11:09, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renault PE (1928).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:07, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theba gittenbergeri, shell, brown form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hexaplex trunculus trunculus 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanz D 3506 All-purpose version.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the reflection in the windows, but good quality.--Famberhorst 16:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia - Affenberg Salem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:29, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Avery 45/65 (1923).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:39, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hexaplex trunculus ssp. trunculus (Banded Dye-Murex), subfossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:40, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hart-Parr 30/60 (1916).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:56, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Affenberg Salem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:55, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hanomag SR45 (1936).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lanz D 3506, All-purpose version (1950).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info The Lanz D3506 was built 1936 - 1942 and 1950 - 1952. During the second period (1950 - 1952) Lanz offered two versions of the D 3506: The "Ackerluft" with smaller rear wheels and the "All purpose version" in which the rear wheels are larger.
 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:55, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Babylonia lutosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Babylonia lutosa (Lutose Babylon), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthyllis vulneraria ssp. rubriflora (Red-flowering common kidneyvetch), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fendt Dieselross F 18 (1939).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthyllis vulneraria ssp. rubriflora (Red-flowering common kidneyvetch), Inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 13:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cymbula compressa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:15, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
SLM-Loki LM (1938).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymbula compressa (Compressed Limpet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obba rota 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vögele stone crusher (1932).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:23, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support, useful.--Pierre André (talk) 14:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ceanothus americanus (New Jersey Tea), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Svoboda DK 12 (1940).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Obba rota (Rota Obba), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerithium alucastrum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:49, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transmitter mast - Merkur tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:56, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
SFV Vierzon H1 (1936).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Pierre André (talk) 21:57, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cerithium alucastrum, subfossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful--Pierre André (talk) 21:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kleinland Ponny (1952).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Merkurturm, Baden-Baden, view from south east..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
South-West-North-Panorama from Merkur tower, Baden-Baden.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Babylonia spirata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paraglider - Merkur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lanz HRK-55 Raupenbulldog (1938).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

The one and only! --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Babylonia spirata (Spiral Babylon), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weilergraben - Blumeggweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 17:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ceanothus americanus (New Jersey Tea), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lanz D 3506 modified (1941).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info This tractor with 4 rear wheels instead of 2 was modified by a Swiss trucking company.

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Pierre André (talk) 21:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Babylonia japonica (Japanese Babylon), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xeropicta krynickii 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:55, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Babylonia japonica 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 05:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dioscorea villosa (Wild Yam), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baker 25-50 (1928).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dioscorea villosa (Wild Yam), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kramer K15 road roller version (1954).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info In small numbers the Kramer K15 tractor was converted to a road roller.

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:45, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pterynotus elongatus 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pterynotus elongatus 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Babylonia areolata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xeropicta krynickii, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dioscorea villosa (Wild Yam), fruits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schlüter DZM25 (1939).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traktormuseum Bodensee, workshop of a cooper.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Babylonia areolata (Spotted Babylon), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Unitrak UD 12 (1952).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traktormuseum Bodensee, smithy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scutellastra tabularis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good, good quality--Lmbuga 15:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traktormuseum Bodensee, workshop of a wainwright.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Mathieu MD (talk) 18:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Massey Harris GP 15/22 (1933).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Mathieu MD (talk) 18:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scutellastra tabularis (Tabular Limpet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Nice. --C messier (talk) 19:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Mathieu MD (talk) 18:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dracunculus vulgaris (Dragon Arum), habitus at natural stand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ursus Bambi C10 (1957).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traktormuseum Bodensee, workshop of a shoemaker.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:00, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dracunculus vulgaris (Dragon Arum), male and female flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Can you add identifying notes to image. Charles (talk) 15:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Done --Llez (talk) 15:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

 Support useful now. Charles (talk) 16:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 13:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fiat 703 (1924).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 15:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traktormuseum Bodensee, engineering workshop.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment For good English should be workshop not works. Charles (talk) 16:43, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks for the hint --Llez (talk) 05:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 15:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manzonia overdiepi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --C messier (talk) 15:48, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pimpinella major var. major (Greater Burnet-saxifrage), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:08, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traktormuseum Bodensee, fire equipment room.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pimpinella major var. major (Greater Burnet-saxifrage), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 12:21, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wallis Cub (1915).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Pierre André (talk) 20:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 01:28, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traktormuseum Bodensee, workshop of a carpenter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 19:44, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fageol 9-12 (1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 19:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chytra kirki, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Doyen D (1927).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 01:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Truncatella subcylindrica (Looping Snail), adult shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I don't see any other good competitor...--Jebulon (talk) 23:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 01:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! International Harvester 4100 (1967).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ursus UB 45 (1936).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
International Harvester 4100 (1967).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 21:46, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Truncatella subcylindrica (Looping Snail), juvenile shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 21:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strychnos ignatii (Ignatius bean), seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support usefull and best in scope Olivier LPB (talk) 19:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traktormuseum Bodensee - Entrance area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natica collaria 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strychnos nux-vomica (Strychnine tree), seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meersburg Castle, well.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Natica collaria (Collared Moon Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tecoma fulva ssp. garrocha (Orange Bells), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meersburg Castle, renaissance parlour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brunfelsia latifolia (Yesterday-Today-and-Tomorrow), flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meersburg Castle, kitchen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment used in ? Olivier LPB (talk) 15:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 Support Now you don't have to be used, it can be used in the future. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Sure, it's a very specific image. But it's even better if we present images that are already placed in recent weeks. It is a pledge aditional value. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust Annette von Droste-Hülshoff - Burg Meersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:09, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helicella itala ssp. itala, banded form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nerita albicilla 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meersburg Castle, castle chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Not to confuse with the gothic chapel of Burg Meersburg  Best in Scope--Palauenc05 (talk) 22:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Mathieu MD (talk) 20:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nerita albicilla (Blotched Nerite), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Mathieu MD (talk) 20:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chytra kirki 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 17:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meersburg Castle, Bust of Annette von Droste-Hülshoff.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meersburg Castle, servants' kitchen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rissoina plicatula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 22:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meersburg Castle, armoury.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:56, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:55, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Duranta erecta 'Variegata' (Golden Dewdrop), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwartziella inconspicua, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Duranta erecta 'Variegata' (Golden Dewdrop), inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helicella itala ssp. itala, white form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Sorry, was linked to the wrong category; corrected now. --Llez (talk) 13:28, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oxymeris areolata (Dark-spotted Auger), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:57, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Dwellings Unteruhldingen 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 20:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salem abbey church "Unsere Liebe Frau", interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:53, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Terebra pertusa (Perforated Auger), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asphodeline lutea (Yellow Asphodel), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 19:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxymeris areolata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terebra pertusa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! German Flag - Lake Constance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monoplex parthenopeus (Giant Hairy Triton), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bacopa madagascariensis (Madagascan Bacopa), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viviparus ater 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Famberhorst 18:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Italian water steps - Mainau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition--ArildV 15:00, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pile dweller - Unteruhldingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kroton 08:43, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monoplex parthenopeus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:16, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meersburg Castle, knight's hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:58, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Map of Lake Constance - Mainau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Viviparus ater (Italian River Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Uhldingen-Mühlhofen, statue of a pile dweller.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 09:50, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbo chinensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salem Abbey - Unteres Tor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbo chinensis (Chinese Turban), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flowers map of Lake Constance, Mainau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think the scope is not good, too ambiguous: you don't know if it's an actual drawn map, or this flowers map. --Mathieu MD (talk) 14:33, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Done Scope changed from "map" to "Flowers map" --Llez (talk) 18:49, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope--Mathieu MD (talk) 20:51, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 20:10, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rissoina multicostata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 22:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eagle 20/40 H (1928).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:51, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horse-drawn fire engine by Georg Friedrich Lendenberger, 1767.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steam fire engine "Greenwich Gem" № 1582 (1896).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis tuberculata tuberculata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good picture. Pymouss 22:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis tuberculata ssp. tuberculata (Green Ormer), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eremina dillwyniana dillwyniana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horse-drawn fire engine by Justus Christian Braun, 1865.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 22:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill - Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horse-drawn fire engine by the Feuerlösch-Maschinenfabrik A. Rönneburg, 1911.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eremina dillwyniana ssp. dillwyniana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolma millegranosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 18:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salem Abbey - sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:46, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merkur - Baden-Baden - Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The weather is not ideal for this shot, leaving the horizon unclear, other than that I can't see any obvious flaws. Weak support vote from me; if noone objects it can be promoted to QI status. --Peulle 11:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horse-drawn petrol fire engine by Grether & Cie., 1922.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:58, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bolma millegranosa (Sandpaper Bolma), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:58, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horse-drawn petrol fire engine by Magirus, 1926.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:27, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 21:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horse-drawn hydrophor by Heinrich Kurtz, 1890.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 19:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phosinella dunkeriana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 19:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hand-drawn fire engine by Newsham and Ragg, 1780.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scutus unguis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Single-axle petrol fire engine by Magirus, 1920.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scutus unguis (Hoof Shield Limpet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 03:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Material and fire hose trolley by Magirus, 1910.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:14, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 18:07, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eremina dillwyniana nounensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hand-drawn fire engine by Joseph Beduwe, 1900.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eremina dillwyniana ssp. nounensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:02, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tectus fenestratus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:57, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salem Abbey - Corner tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 17:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fire engine TSA 8 by C. Metz on trailer, 1939.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 23:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dinodontosaurus, skull.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 23:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tectus fenestratus (Fenestrate Top Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 23:20, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca sylvanus - Affenberg Salem - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 17:41, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinodontosaurus - skull.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fire engine - Joseph Beduwe - 1900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 06:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hand-drawn fire engine by the bell foundry Rosenlächer, 1796.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 21:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patelloida saccharina 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Patelloida saccharina (Broad-ribbed Sugar Limpet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support ok for me Olivier LPB (talk) 18:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unsere Liebe Frau - Salem - Ecce homo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burnupena pubescens 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Burnupena pubescens, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 22:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salem abbey church "Unsere Liebe Frau", Ecce-homo-altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Мирослав Видрак (talk) 16:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eremina vermiculosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty shell and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:19, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eremina vermiculosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 21:11, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pandalosia ephamilla, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and only example in scope.--Godot13 (talk) 23:08, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 00:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lagenorhynchus albirostris - skeleton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 15:42, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lagenorhynchus albirostris (White-beaked Dolphin), skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Мирослав Видрак (talk) 16:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crisilla cristallinula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rissoina deshayesi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:22, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otala lactea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 15:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Otala lactea (Milk snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry (talk) 01:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barleeia tropica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. INeverCry (talk) 07:35, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 16:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pollia undosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pollia undosa (Waved Goblet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 SupportNikhil (talk) 05:12, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 Support Best in scope. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  00:26, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antillophos hirasei (Hirase's Phos), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otala fauxnigra 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Otala fauxnigra, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engina lanceolata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patelloida striata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Patelloida striata (Striate Limpet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:10, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phenacovolva rosea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phenacovolva rosea (Rosy Spindle Cowry), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allognathus hispanicus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beach - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat - San Agustín - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Allognathus hispanicus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:45, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lifeguard tower - San Agustin - Gran Canaria.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lifeguard tower - San Agustin - Gran Canaria.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 23:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Float balls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (but still I'd reduced sharpening a bit). --Poco a poco 17:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks, you are right; Correction done --Llez 18:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tritia neritea ssp. westerlundi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:08, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boats - San Agustín - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strelitzia alba 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monilea belcheri 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pedalos San Agustin - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monilea belcheri ( Belcher's Top Snail), brown form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 02:53, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 22:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arianta arbustorum arbustorum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beach - San Agustin - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality to me, and an interesting picture. -- Ikan Kekek 00:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lighthouse artwork - San Agustin - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strelitzia alba (White-flowered wild banana), flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco de Fataga 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mundo Aborigen - Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arianta arbustorum ssp. arbustorum (Copse Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 02:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Agustín, Gran Canaria, lighthouse sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mundo Aborigen - Houses 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mundo Aborigen - Houses 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crisp. -- Ikan Kekek 08:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crassispira hypermeces, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mundo Aborigen - Tumulus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monilea belcheri 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not 100% sharp at full size, but with this level of detail and resolution, this is unquestionably a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 19:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerdo negro canario.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monilea belcheri ( Belcher's Top Snail), red form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 22:21, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mundo Aborigen, Gran Canaria, recreated tumulus of the Guanches.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sus scrofa domesticus (Domestic pig), Cerdo negro canario.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cosmetalepas africana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope ~ Moheen ^(talk) 05:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cosmetalepas africana 0.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mundo Aborigen - Houses 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclophorus coronensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 17:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia canariensis - Barranco de Fataga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Famberhorst 18:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mundo Aborigen - Houses 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyclophorus coronensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mundo Aborigen, Gran Canaria, Residence of the Guanarteme, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question, Hi Llez, I tried to find out what this image is showing, but the Spanish article linked to in the English file description (es:Guarnateme) does not exist. Should it be en:Guanches per the Mundo Aborigen website? DeFacto (talk). 19:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Info You are right. Sorry, I had a misspellnig in the link. The correct link, now also in the description page is Guanarteme (the highest authority of the Guanches). --Llez (talk) 20:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support, thanks - useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:39, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco de Fataga 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. The railing bottom left and right is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 17:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Santa Lucía de Tirajana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:59, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fissurella nubecula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:25, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mundo Aborigen - Houses 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:59, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fissurella nubecula (Cloudy Keyhole Limpet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Santa Lucía de Tirajana - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:47, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Santa Lucía de Tirajana - Santa Lucía.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mundo Aborigen, Gran Canaria, Tagoror, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucy and Star Boy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bela oceanica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenix canariensis 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria, Statue of Santa Lucía de Tirajana.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antonius Maria Claret y Clará - Santa Lucía de Tirajana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pisinna chasteri, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria, Lucy and Star Boy monument.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. All criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poiretia cornea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (take care of the focus) --The Photographer 15:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco de Fataga 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 15:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romeria de los Labradores - Santa Lucía de Tirajana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Picture of Saint Anthony Mary Claret, Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it would be useful that this image is used. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Info It is (and was) linked by the catogory to the German Wikipedia article. --Llez (talk) 07:50, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 02:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poiretia cornea (Dalmatian predator), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 02:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rissoina bruguieri, juvenile shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riscos de Tirajana - San Bartolomé de Tirajana.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Matriarcado - Santa Lucía de Tirajana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayacata - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:39, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Picture of painted tiles "Romeria de los Labradores", Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

This would be more useful if the picture was in the article. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 Done Also in the my other nomation --Llez (talk) 07:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 04:02, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"El Matriarcado" by Victor Navarro Guedes, Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwartziella bryerea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinus canariensis - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocks - Ayacata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roque Nublo - Gran Canaria.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Obtusella intersecta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roque Nublo - Barranco de Tejeda.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent quality, I added a note of a building that look tilt maybe --The Photographer 16:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC) On the first sight it looks so, but the others (also the small house and the mast in a short distance on the right) are not. You get the impression for the house is at an angle to the viewing direction, as you can see, when you look on this military station - which ist located in a short distance west of the Pico de la Nieves - on google maps. --Llez 22:12, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphincterochila fimbriata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 22:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Mirador Pico de los Pozos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, a bit harsh light though. --Laitche 12:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Degollada de la Cumbre - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco de las Lagunetas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Romeria de los Labradores - Santa Lucía de Tirajana.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Romeria de los Labradores - Santa Lucía de Tirajana.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphincterochila fimbriata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 22:55, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Socorro - Tejeda - facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Socorro - Tejeda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clanculus guineensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clanculus guineensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 00:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 01:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Socorro - Tejeda - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 17:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Latirus philberti (Philbert's Peristernia), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Socorro, Tejeda, Gran Canaria, view from south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Socorro, Tejeda, Gran Canaria, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:08, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Roque Nublo - Gran Canaria.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roque Nublo - Gran Canaria.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Socorro - Tejeda - left side altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latirus philberti 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Socorro, Tejeda, Gran Canaria, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 16:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Socorro - Tejeda - right side altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Chandelier bit on the light side, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vermetus triquetrus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Socorro, Tejeda, Gran Canaria, left side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House - Tejeda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vermetus triquetrus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tejeda - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helicodonta obvoluta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Socorro, Tejeda, Gran Canaria, right side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helicodonta obvoluta (Cheese snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 21:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 01:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dugout houses - Artenara - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 18:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dugout houses - Artenara - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Virgen del Socorro, Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Socorro, Tejeda, Gran Canaria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 21:20, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful.--Pierre André (talk) 23:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tejeda, Gran Canaria, view from northeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Pierre André (talk) 22:01, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Natica specialis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 03:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Pierre André (talk) 22:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Cuevita - Artenara - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality --The Photographer 17:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Cuevita - Artenara - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality --The Photographer 17:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palmadusta diluculum ssp. diluculum ( Daybreak Cowry), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmadusta diluculum diluculum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Cuevita - Artenara - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ermita de la Cuevita, Artenara, Gran Canaria, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ermita de la Cuevita, Artenara, Gran Canaria, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand sculpture - Puerto de Mogan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Is the white stuff salt? --Ermell 16:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)  CommentI don't know, but it is interesting to see a landscape with "snow" at a beach of the Canarian Islands --Llez 17:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bougainvilleas - Puerto de Mogán - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bougainvilleas - Puerto de Mogán - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notadusta punctata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Notadusta punctata (Brown-spotted Cowry), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:13, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vermetus triquetrus 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vermetus triquetrus 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stagnicola corvus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 00:00, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bougainvilleas - Puerto de Mogán - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bougainvilleas - Puerto de Mogán - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bougainvilleas - Puerto de Mogán - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 19:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bougainvilleas - Puerto de Mogán - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 19:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stagnicola corvus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info I found no english vernacular name. In German it is called "Raben-Sumpfschnecke", "Große Sumpfschnecke" or "Dunkle Sumpfschnecke".

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bougainvilleas - Puerto de Mogán - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Like to remove faded flowers. Just kidding. Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:53, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clathromangelia granum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 02:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 22:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ermita de la Cuevita, Artenara, Gran Canaria, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 21:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalanchoe beharensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suricata suricatta - Palmitos Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mine is nicer :-) Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Roque Nublo - Barranco de Tejeda.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roque Nublo - Barranco de Tejeda.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houses - Puerto de Mogán - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House - Puerto de Mogán.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 11:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitromorpha canariensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and only photo on Commons in this scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 02:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)