User talk:KristianPikner

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, KristianPikner!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Virmalised 18.03.15 (4).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Virmalised 18.03.15 (4).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

And also:

• File:Virmalised 17.03.15.jpg
• File:Virmalised 14.12.15.jpg
• File:Virmalised 07.10.15 (2).jpg
• File:Virmalised 07.10.15.jpg
• File:Virmalised 18.03.15 (3).jpg
• File:Virmalised 18.03.15.jpg
• File:Virmalised 18.03.15 (2).jpg

Yours sincerely, Rrburke (talk) 16:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

@Rrburke: what joke is this? There is no problem with permission. Kruusamägi (talk) 02:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, @Kruusamägi: Did you read the edit summary? The images are already posted online at http://minupilt.err.ee/index.php (search on 'pikner'). In such a case it makes sense to have to uploader establish via OTRS that he is indeed the copyright holder, and not simply a person who found the images online and uploaded them to Commons. --Rrburke (talk) 12:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Not that this is the only place. He has also posted them to Facebook. And so? Is this your normal behavior towards new users?

He is the author of those images and there is absolutely no reason to insist otherwise. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Ütleme, et nende piltidega on korras.

Kuna inimesed kipuvad vahel üles laadima internetist leitud pilte, siis on nende fotode siit keskkonnast kustutamine igapäevane tegevus. Selle tõttu on tekkinud teatav kartus uute kasutajate fotode osas. Eriti, kui need fotod on väga head, nagu antud juhul. Sest sel puhul on arvestatav oht, et üleslaadija pole tegelikult piltide autor. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Butterfly identifications

Hi Kristian, thank you for uploading your pictures here! I see that a few of your butterfly pictures are misidentified: would you please make the following corrections? This one is actually Pieris rapae, this one is Nymphalis xanthomelas, and this one is Coenonympha pamphilus. Cheers--LamBoet (talk) 01:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Mõned kommentaarid

• Kas oleksid valmis oma looma- ja taimefotode juurde (nt) lisama infot ka selle kohta, et kus pilt on tehtud (kasvõi valla/linna täpsusega)? Entsüklopeedia seisukohast on see väga tänuväärne lisandus, sest sellises keskkonnas on pildi informatiivne osa veel eriti tähtis.
• Mida arvad mõne oma foto lisamisest originaalmõõdus (nt)? Võiks proovida, kas mõni foto pääseks Commonsi parimate sekka. (faililehekülje allosas on muidu link "Laadi üles selle faili uus versioon")
• Kui sulle sobib, siis arvaksin muidu Eestist väljapool tehtud pildid HELP piltide alt välja. Vikipeedia seisukohast on nad muidugi endiselt väärtuslikud, lihtsalt selle konkreetse kampaania seisukohalt läheb temaatika natuke mööda :)
• Kui sind peaks huvitama midagi statistikaalast, siis nt siit (https://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/glamorous.php?doit=1&username=KristianPikner&use_globalusage=1&ns0=1&show_details=1&projects[wikipedia]=1) näed oma piltide kasutust Vikipeedias. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Võin mõningad pildid täismõõdus ülesse laadida küll. Kuhu lisada looma ja taimefotode juures informatsioon. Samuti võib välismaised pildid Helpist ära eemaldada. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KristianPikner (talk • contribs) 19:59, 05 December 2016 (UTC)

Pildiinfot saab täiendada faililehekülgi muutes (näide).

Kommentaari allkirjastamiseks lisa selle järgi ~~~~ ja see muutub salvestamisel allkirjaks. Kruusamägi (talk) 08:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Commonsis valitakse ka eeskujulikke pilt. Esitasin ühe sinu foto kandidaadiks (tõenäoliselt päritakse seal peagi küll koha koordinaatide kohta jms; aitab määrata nt see).

Saad muidu ka ise kandidaate üle seada (ja üles seatud piltide juures hääletada ning kommenteerida). Korraga saab üles seada kuni 2 kandidaati. Minu enda ühes lemmikud on nt see ja see (kuigi siin tekib arvatavasti horisondi osas küsimusi). Nagu valimistel ikka, on tulemused vahel ootamatud, aga võiks proovida. Pildid on lihtsalt nii hea. Kruusamägi (talk) 21:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Märkus: eeskujuliku pildi kandidaadid tuleb ka siia lisada, muidu neid ei märgata. Selleks muudad seal lähteteksti ja lisad {{}} vahele nominatsioonilehe pealkirja (näide). Sellised väiksed detailid, millega on algul tülikas harjuda. Kruusamägi (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Selle kohta oleks mõned küsimused. Nt kui pikka ajaperioodi see time-lapse katab? Kruusamägi (talk) 10:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Kas oleks võimalik lisada mõne pildi juurde natuke täpsemat asukohainfot? Täpsemalt siis siia, siia, siia ja siia. Arvan, et ämbliku ja rebase pildi puhul võiks neil olla ka FP potentsiaali. Ja kui siia koordinaadid saaks, siis paigutuks see kenasti ka eeskujulike piltide kaardile. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Virmalised 18.03.15 (4).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Virmalised 18.03.15 (4).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sõmeri tuletorn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sõmeri tuletorn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Virmalised 18.03.15 (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Virmalised 18.03.15 (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - January - Drone photography/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Loojang 08.01.2017 - Sunset 08.01.2017 4.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Drone photography, in January 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear KristianPikner,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Virmalised 17.03.15.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Virmalised 17.03.15.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pärnu jõgi Sindis.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pärnu jõgi Sindis.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Categories in Wikimedia Commons

Please learn how the category system of Wikimedia Commons works. For more information, please study COM:CAT. - Takeaway (talk) 09:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Riiulpilv - Shelf cloud (2) copy.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Riiulpilv - Shelf cloud (2) copy.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Merisk - Eurasian oystercatcher - Haematopus ostralegus (1) copy.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Merisk - Eurasian oystercatcher - Haematopus ostralegus (1) copy.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Linnutee - Milky Way (9) copy.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Linnutee - Milky Way (9) copy.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MTZ 82 light painting in winter night. Esotnia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality; there is a bit noise in full resolution, but well tolerable --Megatherium 19:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! An-14 plane2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallhaigur - Grey Heron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I like the composition --Podzemnik 00:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kormoran - The great cormorant - Phalacrocorax carbo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niidurüdi - Calidris alpina schinzii (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 02:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Randtiir - Arctic tern - Sterna paradisaea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virmalised 07.10.15 - Aurora Borealis 07.10.15 (11) copy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same question here: Why "copy"? I suppose some people would insist on perspective correction, but I won't. -- Ikan Kekek 22:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virmalised 17.03.15 - Aurora Borealis 17.03.15 (8) copy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. But why does the filename have "copy" in it? -- Ikan Kekek 22:38, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aluoja juga - Aluoja waterfall (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Probably a QI, but User:KristianPikner, since it's so simple to make a very small horizontal crop to eliminate the disturbing narrow blob in the lower left corner, please do that. Then I will support. -- Ikan Kekek 02:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC)  Done Kruusamägi 19:41, 23 June 2018 (UTC) Thanks.  Support. -- Ikan Kekek 19:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metskits - Roe deer - Capreolus capreolu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:54, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paadrema Püha Kolmainu kirik copy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virmalised 15.09.2017 - Aurora Borealis 15.09.2017 copy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty good but can you please add better description? Like where is it at least :) --Podzemnik 01:00, 24 June 2018 (UTC)  Done As the exact location was given in coordinates, then based on that I added some info to the descriptions. Kruusamägi 11:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)  Support - Podzemnik, I hope you don't mind my promoting this, now that the location of the camera is described. Great photo, possible FP. -- Ikan Kekek 09:08, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virmalised 27.03.2017 - Northern Lights 28.03.17 copy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A visibly quality-image. GerifalteDelSabana 13:53, 27 June 2018 (UTC) Once again, a better description would be a lovely side dish. :) GerifalteDelSabana 13:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Päikesetõus - Sunrise (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Simisa 12:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virmalised 14.12.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Talk to me about the star trails. Is this degree of trailiness inevitable because of the 280-second exposure? -- Ikan Kekek 09:11, 25 June 2018 (UTC) About 30 sec might be the max, that is possible without leaving the trails. Kruusamägi 17:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)  Comment - Thanks for your answer. I don't really feel qualified to judge this photo. Please, anyone else, have a look. -- Ikan Kekek 03:26, 26 June 2018 (UTC)  Support @Ikan Kekek: Yes, the star trails are inevitable, a 20-second exposure time already forms considerable trailing if you pixel peek, 280 seconds is a lot more. Overall, a good picture. GerifalteDelSabana 05:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virmalised 18.03.15 - Aurora Borealis 18.03.15 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Geocode would have been nice. --Peulle 21:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virmalised 17.02.15 - Aurora Borealis 17.02 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality imho. --GerifalteDelSabana 22:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virmalised 18.03.15 - Aurora Borealis 18.03.15 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality: As sharp as a northern light shot can be under the very difficult light situation. --Xorx 07:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virmalised 18.03.15 - Aurora Borealis 18.03.15 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality: As sharp as a northern light shot can be under the very difficult light situation. --Xorx 07:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virmalised 18.03.15 - Aurora Borealis 18.03.15 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Öine pärnu copy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Adámoz 08:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Rakvere Tarvas.jpg

File:Rakvere Tarvas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 13:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)