User talk:Jovianeye/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jovianeye!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prairie Shores.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Added location. --Ikar.us 20:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valluvar Kottam.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. However, needs a debate. Rare view. Not to be ignored.--Jebulon 17:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)  Comment I have added another image with a different view in March 28 section but I have always felt this one is more encyclopaedic. --Jovianeye 00:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC) And for art-oriented reviewers, the other one will be too tightly cropped. Why does it need debate? Nobody opposes. --Ikar.us 01:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC) why "need a debate" ? Because before my support, nobody was interessed by this nice picture. Now, we have a debate.-----Jebulon 10:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 92e544896b2e0eca4741dab70567e6e2

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valluvar Kottam.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Valued monument. This image all criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support for the image, but  Request to improve the Wikipedia article. It introduces the object as "landmark", followed by some statements I don't understand ("All the roads around the area are associated with tank."). --Ikar.us (talk) 22:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Info I have improved the article and removed some confusing statements. Valluvar Kottam is not a temple, it is a memorial dedicated to the Tamil poet Tiruvalluvar. -- JovianEye (talk) 23:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
• Information added in {{en}} description and  Support. --Myrabella (talk) 07:00, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 07:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valluvar Kottam 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Intrest, good photo, imo QI --Skipper Michael 23:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charminar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Interesting building. ccw tilted (but this is not qic). Best in scope, but I would prefer a photograph that shows it has a quadratic layout (hope you understand that terrible english ;-) --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:04, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
• The best existing image for me too. Reasoning about possible better images isn't a valid criterion against the best existing one, given that it fulfills the criteria. Therefore I  Support. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Info I have fixed the tilt in the image by 0.42 CW. -- JovianEye (talk) 22:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

If you have no photograph of another view in your archive then I  Support this one. --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I thought JovianEye made this photograph ;-) --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:19, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 09:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Agora Sculpture.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agora Sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not great but ok --Simonizer 22:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kathakali.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Request Very interesting. Could you please add a geotag? --Myrabella (talk) 20:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Is a geotag neccessary? This is an indoor shot. Secondly, I do not know about the location since I am only the nominator. Anyways, I have left a message on the user's page who actually shot this image. -- JovianEye (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for the geotag. Best image in scope to me, all criteria met. Firstly, the scene takes place in Kerala, from where this form of dance-drama originated. Secondly, the picture well shows the performer's hand gestures and facial expression, which are main features (according to en:Kathakali, "in Kathakali, the story is enacted purely by the movements of the hands (called mudras or hand gestures) and by facial expressions (rasas) and bodily movements.") Moreover, the actor plays an emblematic character, stated in the description. I didn't find a better picture with these features. Thirdly, I guess we see a piece of the usual lamp in front of the performer ("Kathakali is usually performed in front of the huge Kalivilakku (kali meaning dance; vilakku meaning lamp)". One may only regret that the stage and the musicians aren't shown. File:Kerala_02.jpg does it, but with poorer description and technical quality. Minor remark: if you have some knowledge in this form of art, maybe could you add the name of the hand gestures (see this table). --Myrabella (talk) 11:32, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 13:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Olivet Baptist Church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Ianare 15:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ripon Building panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ripon Building panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victory Monument Chicago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Victory Monument (Chicago).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best from category, all criteria met. --Ikar.us (talk) 09:57, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:35, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Wasp & aphid May 2010-1.jpg

Scope was changed from Braconid wasp laying an egg inside an aphid to Oviposition in braconid wasps. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 08:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Просьба

Коллега! Если Вас не затруднит не могли бы Вы перевести в формат SVG эти файлы: File:Znak.jpg, File:Znak1.jpg. Заранее благодарен --Kolchak1923 (talk) 19:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riveted Bell Buoy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Ianare 02:20, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Floods in QI

You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 19:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Jovianeye!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Pethheatdesign.svg was uncategorized on 30 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Brisbanebanditsesign.svg was uncategorized on 30 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steeple of St James Catholic Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments little CA imo acceptable --Mbdortmund 22:16, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! General Logan Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, better. --Cayambe 16:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eagle Harbor Lighthouse Sideview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Indian Passport.jpg

File:Indian Passport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I do hope we can save this, but I think it needs to be discussed. Indian copyright law seems to lack the usual exemptions, so we'd need to figure out what to do, and whether the symbol (the only copyrightable part of the image) is old enough to be out of copyright. =/ --Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:39, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Capital_with_crowd_and_cameras.jpg Tilt corrected

Yes, there was some tilt in the image. It has been corrected. Thank you.--Amadscientist (talk) 00:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IIT Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

QIC, Consensual review

Hello. Would you please verifiy the count of votes you made concerning this pic, in the running total of Consensual review. I'm not sure you are right, maybe you counted only the little "green cross symbol", and not all the opinions... Sorry if I'm wrong. Salut ! --Jebulon (talk) 22:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain of the Great Lakes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 08:37, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Floodlights.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain Of The Great Lakes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metra Locomotive EMD F40PHM-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. The geotag is there, but please also add the name of the locality to the descr. --Cayambe 07:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)  Done --Jovianeye 16:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IIT Machinery Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment ccw tilted by 0.128° --Berthold Werner 09:06, 11 June 2010 (UTC)  Done Tilt fixed. --Jovianeye 13:38, 11 June 2010 (UTC)> Ah, sorry. It is clockwise tilted. Sorry, my error. --Berthold Werner 17:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC) Rotated 1st version CCW by 0.13. Hope it is ok now! :-) --Jovianeye 17:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)  Support Jepp, it's okay now ;-) --Carschten 19:10, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metra Locomotives F40PH-2 & MP36PH-3S.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Red light cameras.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, agree with reason. --Ikar.us (talk) 10:21, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:36, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi A8 D4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An ok from an audi driver ;-) --Berthold Werner 19:10, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hartzell Memorial United Methodist Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a small spot in the sky. (look at annotation) --Berthold Werner 12:16, 17 June 2010 (UTC) I really dont know what that was, but I have fixed it. --Jovianeye 14:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC) Ok for me. (Yes, the street lamp is a bit disturbing, but it's there and it's part of this place.) --Berthold Werner 15:41, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Light Camera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me.--Jebulon 23:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IIT Main Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good in my opinion. Perspective is not corrected completely, but I find this better than potential visual side effects from a stronger correction. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IIT Armour Laboratory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IIT Machinery Hall 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Still very good, although sky is slightly overexposed in the lower part. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:19, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cryogenic Liquid Nitrogen Tank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Useful. Trace 11:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Puvar 20080220-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puvar 20080220-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Agora_Sculpture.jpg

File:Agora_Sculpture.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JeremyA (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! N Connector.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The paper could be "whiter", but otherwise very good. -- H005 17:49, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RF Attenuator 30dB 5W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO good now. --Berthold Werner 09:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Global Vipassana Pagoda 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 16:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David Sassoon Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Indian Notes 10 100 500.JPG

File:Indian Notes 10 100 500.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Jappalang (talk) 06:19, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perspective correction needed. For me the image, to real size, is little clear or perhaps unsharp--Lmbuga 20:07, 9 January 2011 (UTC)  Comment Attention! , the building of the right can disturb--Lmbuga 20:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC) Perspective has been corrected further. The building on the right is an integral part of this place and IMO is not disturbing! --Jovianeye 03:57, 10 January 2011 (UTC)  Support Good result now --George Chernilevsky 17:49, 12 January 2011 (UTC) Ok. But the title of the proposal is "Taj Mahal Palace Hotel" and the building of the right is disturbing (The title is not a place). Thanks, Jovianeye, for the "!"--Lmbuga 00:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taj Mahal Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Perhaps a bit more contrast would be even better --Mbdortmund 18:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motif on Global Vipassana Pagoda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments interesting --Carschten 17:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gateway Of India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wow! --Carschten 16:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Global Vipassana Pagoda 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me and usefull for all. --Coyau 17:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
David Sassoon Library, Mumbai.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in the scope so far, imo. --MrPanyGoff 06:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

 Comment - Just to mention, I think that the name of the home town of the building should be included in the scope so that the audience be clear about its location.--MrPanyGoff 16:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

 Done --JovianEye (talk) 03:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:58, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Main Tower of Municipal Corporation Building, Mumbai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Taxiarchos228 11:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunset in Angamaly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Qi for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)