User talk:Johann Jaritz/Archive/2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Werzer Promenade Seehotel Werzer Bootshaus 17122021 1904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 10 Hausboot 17122021 1898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Buddha-Statue 17122021 1902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Jilly Beach Bootshaus 17122021 1903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße 27 Telekommunikationsgebäude SW-Ansicht 17122021 1865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

Merry Christmas and all the best for 2022 !
Joyeux Noël et Bonne année Johann Jaritz  !
Je te souhaite de nombreux plaisirs gratuits,
de belles collaborations et des découvertes fortuites !
Au plaisir de te recroiser
Cordialement,
—  --Pierre André (talk) 15:29, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Park 23122013 6307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans Pruscha-Weg Park Schwarzerle 17122021 1913.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans Pruscha-Weg Park Esche 17122021 1916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 10:04, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans Pruscha-Weg Park Esche Borke 17122021 1915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans Pruscha-Weg Park Esche Borke 17122021 1917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannaweg Buchenhecken 17122021 1919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:14, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein Baumgartnerhöhe 15042021 0813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Burgruine SO-Ansicht 15042021 0814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Vorwerk und Burgruine 15042021 0819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Burgruine und Faaker See 15042021 0827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein Mittagskogel 15042021 0812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Khevenhüllerweg Ecke 10.-Oktober-Straße Kriegerdenkmal 01052021 0949.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Khevenhüllerweg 1 Zierpflaume 01052021 0950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hauptstraße 163 Hotel-Restaurant Glocknerhof Abbruchhaus 01052021 0951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Augustenstraße 6 Villa Romanini Zaun 01052021 0952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:12, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand Stiefmütterchen 01052021 0953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:12, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am See Bachstraße Seebach 15042021 0802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 04:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am See Bachstraße Seebach 15042021 0803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 04:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am See Bachstraße Seebach 15042021 0804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 04:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am See Bachstraße Seebach 15042021 0805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 04:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Mittagskogel 15042021 8852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am See Bachstraße Seebach 15042021 0806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am See Bachstraße Linde 15042021 0807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am See Inselweg Insel-Transfer 15042021 0808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am See Inselweg Insel-Transfer 15042021 0810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am See Faaker See 30 Insel-Hotel 15042021 0811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am See Inselweg Info-Tafel 15042021 0809.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Peel (talk) 21:16, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am-See Kohlstattstraße Info-Tafel 15042021 0801.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Peel (talk) 21:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am-See Kohlstattstraße Info-Tafel 15042021 0800.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Peel (talk) 21:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Faak am-See Kohlstattstraße Info-Tafel 15042021 0799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Burgruine Süd-Ansicht 15042021 0826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Burgruine SO-Ansicht 15042021 0816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Burgruine SO-Ansicht 15042021 0820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Wirtschaftsgebäude 15042021 0823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannaweg Buchenhecke 17122021 1918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Burgruine SO-Ansicht 15042021 0818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Wirtschaftsgebäude 15042021 0821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnoldstein Thörl Pfarrkirche St. Andrä 08022013 6251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiefling Auen Wörthersee-Süduferstraße 129 Seepension Skant 17052021 8869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Vorwerk und Burgruine 15042021 0817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Jakob Maria Elend 23 Aufnahmsgebäude mit Toilettehäuschen 29092011 9659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Wörther See mit Maria Wörth 08032017 6495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Afritschstrasse 76 Pfarrkirche und Pfarrzentrum Laubengang 10062015 4633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lendorf Rojach 1 Rojachhof Stall Ost-Ansicht 09052016 1910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hüttenberg Ortskern mit Pfarrkirche hl Nikolaus NW-Ansicht 21032017 4915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Bahnhofplatz Österreichischer Hof N-Ansicht 07012022 1940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Augustenstraße 6 Villa Romanini SO-Ansicht 07012022 1944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Jilly Beach Bootshaus 07012022 1954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Jilly Beach Bootshaus 07012022 1947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Werzer's Bootshaus 07012022 1950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Suedbahnweg 29 Martin Luther-Kirche Portal 15062016 2626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steindorf am Ossiacher See Bodensdorf Bahnhofstraße 5 Zugbahnhof 23052019 7093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I find the shadows and fence distracting. Perhaps crop the bottom (with change of aspect ratio)? --Tagooty 04:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. I cropped the photo according to your suggestions. —- Johann Jaritz 06:14, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality, thanks --Tagooty 08:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße Abstellplatz für Bootsanhänger Segelboote 07012022 1925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße Abstellplatz für Bootsanhänger Segelboote 07012022 1927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hauptstraße 160 Österreichischer Hof SO-Ansicht 07012022 1942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Annastraße im Winterkleid 07012022 1943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Karlstraße 11 Villa Renata NW-Ansicht 07012022 1945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße 70 Wohnhaus W-Ansicht 07012022 1924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße 57 Wohnhaus SO-Ansicht 07012022 1929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße Abstellplatz für Bootsanhänger Segelboote 07012022 1931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Winklerner Straße 10 Wohnhaus S-Ansicht 07012022 1928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Bahnhofplatz Österreichischer Hof N-Ansicht 07012022 1941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße Abstellplatz Bootsanhänger 07012022 1934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße 57 Wohnhaus SW-Ansicht 07012022 1933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße Bahnhof Parkplatz 07012022 1935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße 37 Wohnhaus S-Ansicht 07012022 1937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Khevenhüllerweg 1 Appartementhus SO-Ansicht 07012022 1938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schiffsanlegestelle 07012022 1964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Laterne mit Wisteria 07012022 1957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Bänke am Seeufer 07012022 1962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad und Pyramidenkogel 07012022 1951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice --Basile Morin 04:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade und Parkhotel 07012022 1956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 10 Hausboot 07012022 1959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Lake Hotel Strandbar 07012022 1946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 04:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade W-Bucht Seeblick 07012022 1953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Jilly-Bootshaus Parkhotel 07012022 1952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Jilly Beach Café-Terrasse 07012022 1948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Höckerschwäne 07012022 1958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Schneemann-Gesicht 07012022 1960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support :-) --Basile Morin 06:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schiffsanlegestelle 07012022 1961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Ostbucht Schilfgürtel Weide 07012022 1966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte Dörrkasten 14012022 1972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte Dörrkasten 14012022 1981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte Dörrkasten Eiszapfen 14012022 1976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte 14012022 1984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Jilly Beach Café-Terrasse 07012022 1949.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte Dörrkasten 14012022 1970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 04:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte Dörrkasten Eiszapfen 14012022 1974.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 04:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte Dörrkasten Eiszapfen 14012022 1977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte 14012022 1985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Brock-Hof und Zocklwirt 14012022 1983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Minor issue, at the top of the sun, there's a visible horizontal line. Fixable? --Basile Morin 04:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Basile Morin: Thanks for your review. I fixed the mentioned issue of the horizontal line. —- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Thanks. Nice image. -- --Basile Morin 05:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte 14012022 1971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Brockweg 58 Am Kåte vulgo Ostermann 14012022 1973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte Dörrkasten Eiszapfen 14012022 1975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte Dörrkasten 14012022 1982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte Streuobstwiese 14012022 1986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte Dörrkasten 14012022 1980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Wunderbar --Frank Schulenburg 04:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte Streuobstwiese und Sallacher Berg 14012022 1988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg Wanderweg Stieleiche Borkenstruktur 14012022 1995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg 38 Gimplhof SO-Ansicht 14012022 1999.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg Wanderweg Stieleiche 14012022 1997.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
As the tree is central, can you identify the species and add a CAT, please? Good quality otherwise. --Tagooty 04:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your reviews. Specification of the tree is quercus robur. —- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg Wanderweg Stieleiche 14012022 1998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
As the tree is central, can you identify the species and add a CAT, please? Good quality otherwise. --Tagooty 04:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your reviews. Specification of the tree is quercus robur. —- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden am Wörther See Augsdorf Kathreinkogel Karawanken 18012022 9055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Göriach Blick zum Pyramidenkogel 18012022 9053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchenweg Tabernakelbildstock 18012022 9070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchweg 9 Pfarrhof und Pfarrstadel 18012022 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Keutschacher Straße 107 Stadel 18012022 9091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Göriach Blick zum Hochobir 18012022 9063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchweg 9 Pfarrhof Pfarrkirche Pfarrstadel 18012022 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchweg 9 Pfarrhof Sonnenuhr 18012022 9072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf mit Pfarrkirche hl. Maria Rosenkranzkönigin Pfarrhof 18012022 9061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchweg 9 Pfarrhof Pfarrkirche Pfarrstadel 18012022 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Pfarrkirche hl. Maria Rosenkranzkönigin Kreuzigungsgruppe 18012022 9074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchenweg Tabernakelbildstock 18012022 9077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Seecorso 10 Schlosshotel N-Ansicht 18012022 9068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchweg 9 Friedhof Kruzifix 18012022 9088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High-quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Pfarrkirche hl. Maria Rosenkranzkönigin Turmuhr 18012022 9076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Göriach Blick zum Hochstuhl 18012022 9065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Göriach Blick zum Mittagskogel 18012022 9062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Landweg 1 Wohnhäuser 18012022 9089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchweg 9 Friedhof Schnee am Kruzifix-Dach 18012022 9083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchweg Friedhof Schnee am Aufbahrungshallen-Dach 18012022 9084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchenweg Tabernakelbildstock 18012022 9078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchweg 9 Friedhof Schnee am Kruzifix-Dach 18012022 9080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Oberer Kirchweg 9 Pfarrhof Pfarrkirche 18012022 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Lallint 01:42, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Pfarrkirche hl. Maria Rosenkranzkönigin Gitterfenster 18012022 9081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality and great cropping. --Lallint 01:42, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Augsdorf Pfarrkirche hl. Maria Rosenkranzkönigin Klangarkden 18012022 9075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg Eichen am Wanderweg W-Ansicht 14012022 2001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg 38 Gimplhof SO-Ansicht 14012022 2000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg 38 Gimplhof SW-Ansicht 14012022 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg ehem. Bienenhaus umgestürzter Baum 14012022 2004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg Straßenschild und Wegweiser 14012022 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg 38 Gimplhof S-Ansicht 14012022 2002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg ehem. Bienenhaus 14012022 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg 14012022 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße 51 vulgo Komar Wirtschaftsgebäude 14012022 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg ehem. Bienenhaus umgestürzter Baum 14012022 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße 55 Wohnhaus NW-Ansicht 14012022 2003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße Edelweißbad Badesteg 25012022 2037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 03:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg Brunnentrog 14012022 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Quellweg 38 Gimplhof SW-Ansicht 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality, but one sensor spot in the sky, mid-left. --Tagooty 04:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. Sensor spot was removed. —- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Thank you --Tagooty 09:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße 57 Gästehaus Hörmann SW-Ansicht 14012022 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A few sensor spots. May look better if the bottom foreground is cropped? --Tagooty 04:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. Foreground was cropped and sensor spot was removed. —- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Thank you --Tagooty 09:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstraße 77 Zocklwirt vulgo Rumasch 14012022 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Faint sensor spot at left (see note). --Tagooty 04:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)< /br>✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. Sensor spot was removed. —- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Thanks --Tagooty 09:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Sankt Ruprecht Rosentaler Straße 165 bunter Hydrant 28072010 8164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Scherzweg Feuerhydrant 25012022 2028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße Edelweißbad Bushaltestelle 25012022 2038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße 95 Badehaus 25012022 2039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannaweg 1 Villa Venezia W-Ansicht 25012022 2042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße 106 Villa Edelweiß SSW-Ansicht 25012022 2030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße Edelweißbad Badesteg 25012022 2029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße 102 Lieleg-Schlössl Einfahrtstor 25012022 2041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße Edelweißbad Schilfbank mit Rohrkolben 25012022 2033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße Edelweißbad Badesteg 25012022 2031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße Edelweißbad Esche 2501202 2032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße Edelweißbad Eschenborke mit Weinranken 2501202 2036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße Edelweißbad Esche 2501202 2040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Hauptstraße Edelweißbad Schilfbank mit Rohrkolben 25012022 2035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannaweg 5 Villa Wörth WNW-Ansicht 25012022 2044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:57, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannaweg Buchenhecken 25012022 2045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Parkbäume und Schilfgürtel 25012022 2046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Parkbäume und Schilfgürtel 25012022 2047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Parkbäume und Promenadenbad 25012022 2048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Park im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 25012022 2049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 25012022 2050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Ostbucht-Blick 25012022 2051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Naturpark 2501202 2052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Naturpark 25012022 2053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannaweg 1 Villa Venezia SW-Ansicht 25012022 2043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Herbecks Ruhe Park 25012022 2054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Herbecks Ruhe Park 25012022 2055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landschaftspark 25012022 2056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schiffsanlegestelle 25012022 2057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Blick von der Hohe Gloriette 30012022 2085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Lovely composition! --Tagooty 02:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Buchenhain 25012022 2062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Annastraße 25 Appartementhaus SO-Ansicht 25012022 2065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Blick von der Hohe Gloriette 30012022 2082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Buchenhain 25012022 2058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schiffsanlegestelle 25012022 2060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Park 25012022 2061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 25012022 2059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Sortierung

Hallo Johann! Heute habe ich zufällig gesehen, dass bei einem Bild der Sortierschlüssel "Pörtschach" verwendet wird. Jetzt ist es so, dass die Kategorien so sortiert werden, dass "ö" hinter "z" kommt. Als zweiter Buchstabe im Sortierschlüssel hat das durchaus sichtbare Folgen. Im Grunde betrifft das alle nationalen Sonderzeichen und Ligaturen. Um eine sinnvolle Sortierung zu erreichen, ist es notwendig, die passenden Buchstaben zu ersetzen, also als Sortierschlüssel "Portschach" zu verwenden. Ich habe mal per File: insource:/User:Johann Jaritz/ insource:/\[\[Category:[^\[\]]*\| ?Pörtschach[^\[\]]*\]\]/i gesucht. Es sind eine ganze Menge Dateien davon betroffen. Man kann das beheben mit Hilfe von Tools wie VisualFileChange. Es kann sein, dass man das Tool durchaus ein paar Mal anwenden muss - auch für verschiedene Sortierschlüssel. Es geht aber trotzdem relativ fix. (Mir was das übrigens in der Kategorie Category:War memorials in Carinthia aufgefallen, in der Pörtschach nach Pustriz kommt. Viele Grüße aus dem Münsterland! --XRay 💬 05:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach am Wörther See Ortskern mit Zugbahnhof 30012022 2083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Moosburger Straße 25 Kärntner Hof SW-Ansicht 30012022 2076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Kirchplatz 8 Evangelische Heilandskirche 30012022 2072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Kirchplatz Pfarrkirche hl. Johannes d. T. S-Ansicht 30012022 2071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Kirchwegz 8 Pfarrhofgarten Tor 30012022 2070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand 25012022 2063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Jilly-Beach 25012022 2064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Winklerner Straße 10 südl. Gartentor 30012022 2067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Winklerner Straße 10 südl. Gartentor Detail 30012022 2066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Kirchplatz Kriegerdenkmal S-Ansicht 30012022 2074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße 27 Telekommunikationsgebäude Sichtbeton 30012022 2068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße 27 Telekommunikationsgebäude Sichtbeton 30012022 2069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Gloriette-Blick auf Wörther See und Blumeninsel 30012022 2084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Gloriettenweg Hohe Gloriette Wegweiser 30012022 2081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Annastraße 51 Werzers Appartement Resort N-Ansicht 30012022 2089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonsteinerstraße 1 Schloss Leonstein südl. Eisentür 30012022 2088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Gloriettenweg Hohe Gloriette Buchenwald 30012022 2087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Moosburger Straße 21 Villa SW-Ansicht 30012022 2075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Kirchplatz Kriegerdenkmal SO-Ansicht 30012022 2073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Wegweiser 30012022 2077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Gloriettenweg Totholz 30012022 2078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:27, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Blick von der Hohen Gloriette zum Pyramidenkogel 30012022 2079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:08, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Berthastraße 49 See-Gasthaus SO-Ansicht 03022022 2096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Berthastraße 59 Villa Schwalbennest O-Ansicht 03022022 2099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Berthastraße Schiffslandesteg NW-Ansicht 03022022 2092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Berthastraße Buchenhain 03022022 2091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Weningerallee Appartementgebäude S-Ansicht 03022022 2090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Berthastraße 49 See-Gasthaus SO-Ansicht 03022022 2093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Berthastraße Schiffslandesteg NW-Ansicht 03022022 2094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Berthastraße Schiffslandesteg N-Ansicht 03022022 2095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Berthastraße Buchenhain Kinderspielplatz 03022022 2100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Wurdach Ost-Ansicht 04022022 2110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:57, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Wurdach Naturlehrpfad Zwergeule Blochstapel 04022022 2113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:58, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Wurdach Naturlehrpfad Zwergohreule 04022022 2116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Wurdach 53 Bauernhof SW-Ansicht 04022022 2111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Wurdach 2 Wirtschaftsgebäude 04022022 2112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Plöschenberg Rosental-Blick Ferlacher Horn 04022022 2117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:58, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Kleinigkeiten

Hallo Johann!

Denkst du bitte noch daran, bei den folgenden Bildern die Staubflecken zu entfernen. Ich hatte sie bereits mit "pro" bewertet ...

Danke. --XRay 💬 14:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Dietmar!

Das habe ich vollkommen verpasst. Danke für die Erinnerung. Ich werde dem raschest möglich nachkommen.

M.f.G. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Plöschenberg Rosental-Blick Ferlacher Horn 04022022 2118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Wurdach Aussichtspunkt 04022022 2109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Plöschenberg Rosental-Blick Singerberg 04022022 2105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Bundesgymnasium Schild 12022022 2159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Bundesgymnasium SO-Ansicht 12022022 2129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Bundesgymnasium Christus-Relief 12022022 2125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Bundesgymnasium S-Ansicht 12022022 2160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Pamperlallee O-Ansicht 03022022 2101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef 12022022 2128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Chorschluss 12022022 2120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef-Vorhallen Subkonstrukt Eisentor 12022022 2157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Treppe mit Balustrade 12022022 2136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Bundesgymnasium NW-Ansicht 12022022 2124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Promotion in advance, please remove the dust spot at the top. --XRay 04:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Dust spot removed. —- Johann Jaritz 14:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Plöschenberg Landschaft am Waldrand 04022022 2106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Please remove the dust spot on the right. --XRay 05:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Dust spot removed. —- Johann Jaritz 15:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Plöschenberg Landschaft 04022022 2104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. IMO 16:9 would be better. --XRay 04:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
And please remove the dust spot on the right. --XRay 05:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Dust spot removed. —- Johann Jaritz 14:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Plöschenberg Blick zum Ferlacher Horn 04022022 2102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Some dust spots to remove. --Steindy 15:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Steindy: Thanks for your review. Dust spots removed. —- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support IMO OK. Hopefully Steindy will agree. --XRay 12:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Plöschenberg Verteilertransformator 04022022 2103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
In the upper part some dust spots to remove. --Steindy 15:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Steindy: Thanks for your review. Dust spots removed. —- Johann Jaritz 07:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Adamant1 07:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köttmannsdorf Wurdach Baumstümpfe von Apfelbäumen 04022022 2108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
3 dust spots to remove --Steindy 15:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Steindy: Thanks for your review. Dust spots removed. —- Johann Jaritz 07:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support IMO OK. Hopefully Steindy will agree. --XRay 12:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keutschach Höflein Pertitschach Rauschelesee 04022022 2115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support Great shot. Please remove the dust spot in the sky (right). --Steindy 15:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Steindy: Thanks for your review. Dust spot removed. —- Johann Jaritz 08:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef 12022022 2154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice. -- Ikan Kekek 03:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Treppe und Laubengang 12022022 2135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Laubengang 12022022 2142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Chorschluss 12022022 2121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Balustrade am Laubengang 12022022 2145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Laubengang 12022022 2130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Please remove the dust spot at the top. --XRay 04:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 Comment Sorry, now with ping: @Johann Jaritz: Please pay attention to the dust spot. Thank you. --XRay 12:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Sorry, I overlooked your it again. Dust spot removed. —- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Treppenbalustrade 12022022 2137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Substruktion Steinquader 12022022 2150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Laubengang 12022022 2140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Treppe und Laubengang 12022022 2146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Laubengang 12022022 2144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg 1 Schloss N-Teil 12022022 2119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg 1 Schloss Süd-Teil 12022022 2148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:59, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg 1 Schloss Süd-Teil 12022022 2153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:59, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg 1 Schloss Portal-Trakt 12022022 2152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Landschaft mit Bäumen 12022022 2126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg L72 Wirtschaftsgebäude 12022022 2161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg L72 12022022 2158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Treppe und Laubengang 12022022 2138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Laubengang Balustrade 12022022 2147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Pulst SO-Ansicht 12022022 2164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Pulst Kirchplatz 5 Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt SO-Ansicht 12022022 9092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Hoch-Liebenfels Burgruine SO-Ansicht 12022022 9093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Hohenstein 1 Schloss Hohenstein NW-Ansicht 12022022 2162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Hohenstein 1 Schloss Hohenstein NW-Ansicht 12022022 9095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Tanzenberg Pfarrkirche hll. Florian und Josef Substruktion Steinquader 12022022 2149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Hohenstein 1 Schloss Hohenstein NW-Ansicht 12022022 9094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Hoch-Liebenfels Burgruine SO-Ansicht 12022022 9096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Hoch-Liebenfels Burgruine Zinnenmauer Teilansicht 29122016 5937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Hohenstein 1 Schloss Hohenstein NW-Ansicht 12022022 2163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Pulst Kirchplatz 5 Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt SO-Ansicht 12022022 9097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1a Pfarrkirche hl. Urban West-Portal 22022022 2186.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1a Pfarrkirche hl. Urban West-Portal 22022022 2186.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:06, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Sankt Urban Kirchweg 3 Mesnerhaus SW-Ansicht 22022022 2190.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sankt Urban Kirchweg 3 Mesnerhaus SW-Ansicht 22022022 2190.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein 1 Schloss WNW-Ansicht 22022022 2171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein 1 Schloss Süd-Ansicht 22022022 2178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Sankt Martin Filialkirche hl. Martin NW-Ansicht 22022022 9099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein 2 Wohnhaus NO-Ansicht 22022022 2166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein Dietrichsteiner See West-Ansicht 22022022 2168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1a Pfarrkirche hl. Urban W-Ansicht 22022022 2182.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1a Pfarrkirche hl. Urban W-Ansicht 22022022 2182.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein Dietrichsteiner See Süd-Ansicht 22022022 2167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein Dietrichsteiner See Erlen S-Ansicht 22022022 2174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein 1 Schloss WNW-Ansicht 22022022 2169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein 1 Schloss SW-Ansicht 22022022 2176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein Dietrichsteiner See Erlen und Sal-Weiden 22022022 2173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein Dietrichsteiner See Erlen und Sal-Weiden 22022022 2172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Will be useful to indicate which are the goat willows and the alnus glutinosa. --Tagooty 04:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Förolach 1 Bauernhof NW-Ansicht 22022022 9101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, despite the difficult lighting. --Tagooty 04:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Förolach Blick zum Ulrichsberg 22022022 9102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Förolach Haselnuss-Busch 22022022 9103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse Friedhof Bildstock Maria-Dorn-Figur 28032015 0629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein Rinder auf der Weide 19042018 2998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Glan 3 WIGO-Werk N-Ansicht 22022022 9100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein 1 Schloss Süd-Ansicht 22022022 2177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Dietrichstein Dietrichsteiner See Erlen S-Ansicht 22022022 2170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Amthofgasse Filialkirche hl. Michael NO-Ansicht 04062018 3549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1 Pfarrhof West-Ansicht 22022022 2181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:16, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1 Pfarrhof Eingang 22022022 2183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:16, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 3 Mesnerhaus SW-Ansicht 22022022 2190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:16, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1a Pfarrkirche hl. Urban SW-Ansicht 22022022 2185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1a Pfarrkirche hl. Urban West-Portal 22022022 2186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1a Pfarrkirche hl. Urban W-Portal 1524 22022022 2187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1a Pfarrkirche hl. Urban S-Portal 1524 22022022 2188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1 Pfarrhof Eingang Supraporte Fresko 22022022 2184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg Pfarrkirche hl. Urban Mesnerhaus 22022022 2197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 3 Mesnerhaus S-Ansicht 22022022 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1a Pfarrkirche hl. Urban Vorlaube S-Portal 22022022 2193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1a Pfarrkirche hl. Urban vorröm. Kopf 22022022 2189.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Dorfpltz 3 Volksschule W-Ansicht 22022022 2201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1a Pfarrkirche hl. Urban W-Ansicht 22022022 2182.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. There are several dust spots in the sky. Please remove the dust spots. --XRay 04:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done@XRay: Thanks for your review. Dust spots were removed. —- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Urban Kirchweg 1 Pfarrhof West-Ansicht 22022022 2180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Please remove the dust spot at the left. --XRay 04:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Dust spot was removed. —- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Liemberg Pfarrkirche hl. Jakobus major 22022022 2211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Liemberg Pfarrkirche hl. Jakobus major NO-Ansicht 22022022 2207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Liemberg Pfarrkirche hl. Jakobus major Apsis 22022022 2205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Liemberg 1 Schloss O-Ansicht 22022022 2213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Liemberg 1 Schloss gekuppeltes Renaissancefenster 22022022 9105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Mairist Bauernhof 01032022 9118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Beiersdorf Hochosterwitzer Straße Kruzifix 01032022 9112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Längsee Hochosterwitz Burg W-Ansicht 01032022 9121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Längsee Reipersdorf Hochosterwitzer Straße Hemmakapelle 01032022 9125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauenstein Lorenziberg SO-Ansicht 01032022 9116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kappel am Krappfeld Mannsberg 1 Ruine Altmannsberg 01032022 2221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kappel am Krappfeld Mannsberg 1 Schloss Mannsberg 01032022 2230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kappel am Krappfeld Windisch Vorwerkgebäude 01032022 2228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. @Johann Jaritz: I think "Folwark building" in the English should be "Farm building". --Tagooty 03:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kappel am Krappfeld Mannsberg 1 Burg Mannsberg 01032022 2226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kappel am Krappfeld Mannsberg 1 Burg Mannsberg 01032022 2227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kappel am Krappfeld Mannsberg 1 Burg Mannsberg 01032022 2222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kappel am Krappfeld Silberegg Schlossplatz 1 Schloss SO-Ansicht 01032022 2232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kappel am Krappfeld Silberegg Schlossplatz 1 Schloss SW-Turm 01032022 2234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kappel am Krappfeld Silberegg Schlossplatz 1 Schloss SO-Ansicht 01032022 2233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kappel am Krappfeld Pfarrkirche hl. Paul mit Karner Friedhof und Rundkapelle 23112021 1748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßburg Schlossweg 6 ehemalige Bischofsburg SO-Ansicht 01032022 2236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice view. Good quality. --Tsui 03:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßburg Schlossweg 6 ehemalige Bischofsburg W-Ansicht 01032022 2238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Another nice view! Good quality. --Tsui 03:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßburg Schlossweg 6 ehemalige Bischofsburg O-Ansicht 01032022 9132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßburg Schlossweg 3 Kapelle Maria Loretto SO-Ansicht 01032022 2235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßburg Hauptplatz 1a Stadtpfarrkirche hl. Nikolaus O-Ansicht 01032022 9133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Please remove the dust spot (near the church tower). --XRay 05:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Dust spot was removed. —- Johann Jaritz 06:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßburg Lieding Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha mit Friedhof Karner und Pfarrhof S-Ansicht 01032022 9137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßburg Schlossweg 6 ehemalige Bischofsburg W-Ansicht 01032022 2237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Primeln 10032022 9197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Nistkasten 10032022 9193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 rote Tigerkatze Randy 10032022 9195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern Futterhäuschen 10032022 9196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 rote Tigerkatze Randy 10032022 9191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gurk Domplatz 1 Stiftsanlagen Torturm mit Stiftsportal W-Ansicht 01032022 2241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gurk Domplatz 1 Stiftsanlagen Torturm Stiftsportal Torbogen 01032022 9139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Wahlißstraße 11 Villa Johanna WSW-Ansicht 03032022 2244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg S-Ansicht 03032022 2246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Promenade 03032022 2247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel-Strand 03032022 2248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Promenade Park 03032022 2250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Wahlißstraße 11 Villa Johanna S-Ansicht 03032022 2245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Park Uferzone Schilfrohr 03032022 2249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Park Erle 03032022 2253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Promenade Park 03032022 2251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Wörther See-Ostbucht 03032022 2255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Ostbucht Uferzone mit Schilfrohr 03032022 2256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz-Blick auf den Pyramidenkogel 03032022 2261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Parkbäume 03032022 2254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Park Esche Borke 03032022 2252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Ostbucht Uferzone mit Schilfrohr 03032022 2258.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße winterliche Birke 03032022 2263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Can you add a CAT for the bird perched on the top, and add to the Summary. I find this bird adds to the composition. --Tagooty 03:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. CAT for the bird was added. —- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Seeblick nach Maria Wörth 03032022 2260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Ostbucht Uferzone mit Sal-Weide 03032022 2257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Krastowitz Filialkirche hl Ulrich Familiengruft Seherr Thoss Grabplatte 29122016 5921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:58, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt St. Peter Welzenegg Filialkirche hl. Ulrich Glockenturm Portal und Rosette 29122016 5925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:58, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Innere Stadt Benediktinerplatz Marienkirche Altar 27022015 0019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:58, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Elisabethstraße 1 Personalhaus des Parkhotels O-Ansicht 16032022 9205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha Weg 5 Parkhotel Fassade O-Seite Ausschnitt 16032022 9209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha Weg 5 Parkhotel Firmenlogo 16032022 9207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Alfredweg 1 Villa Fenster S-Seite 16032022 9208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Wahlißsstraße 11 Villa Johanna Dachgaube 16032022 9215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Werzerpromenade 6 Tennishalle 19032022 2269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Werzerpromenade 8 Werzers Hotel Resort NO-Ansicht 19032022 2271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Werzerpromenade 8 Werzers Hotel Resort 19032022 2272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Werzerpromenade Schiffsanlegestelle 19032022 2273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Gottscheer Strasse 1 Filialkirche hl Ulrich bei Krastowitz 27122016 5885.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Wölfnitz Hallegger Straße 131 Schloss Hallegg SW-Ansicht 21032015 1002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please indicate the direction or facade of the castle that is shown. Suggestion: crop part of the roof in the foreground? --Tagooty 03:58, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. Image was cropped, description enhanced. —- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Werzerpromenade Wörther See und Pyramidenkogel 19032022 2274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Werzerpromenade 10 Werzers Strandcasino und Mühlbach 19032022 2275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Annastraße 43 Hotel Astoria S-Ansicht 19032022 2276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Annastraße 25 Villa Sole S-Ansicht 19032022 2277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Jilly Beach Bootshaus 19032022 2279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Lake's Strandbar Weide 19032022 2278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Jilly Beach S-Ansicht 19032022 2280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

#invoke:Autotranslate Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--Pi bot ([[User talk:Pi bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Seiten zu Bad Bleiberg

Hallo PAGENAME, du hast die beiden Seiten Bad Bleiberg und Bad Bleiberg (Kärnten) angelegt und befüllt. Mir kommt vor, sie erfüllen identische Zwecke. Magst du sie bitte zusammenmischen und eine der Seiten in eine Weiterleitung auf die andere umwandeln? (vorzugsweise Bad Bleiberg (Kärnten) als WL auf Bad Bleiberg, da ident mit Namen der Kategorie). lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Übersehen? lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Hallo Herzi Pinki, nein, nicht übersehen. War nur zu beschäftigt mit anderen Dingen und finde derzeit (noch) keine Zeit, eine allfällige Zusammenlegung der beiden Seiten vorzunehmen. Übrigens wurde keine der beiden Seiten von mir angelegt, das aber nur am Rande. Schönen Sonntag und liebe Grüße -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, ich habe nur gesehen, dass die meisten Änderungen und Bilder von dir stammen (was deine ehemaligen Accounts angeht, bin ich unsicher). Dann Template:Ping an die Erstautoren. lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Lieber Herzi Pinki, Du hast natürlich vollkommen recht mit dem Anspruch, dass die beiden Seiten zu einer vereint werden sollten und "Doppelbesetzungen" bereinigt werden müssten. Mein Fehler, das nicht von Anfang an getan zu haben. LG. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)