User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windmill in El Cotillo 2022 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some CA. --ArildV 18:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CA tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I still see the CA, but maybe I still see the old version. Second opinion? --ArildV 12:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you add an image note for where you're seeing the CA, please, and I can check further? Thanks. Mike Peel 23:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, done now. --ArildV 10:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the image note. This is odd, it seems to be blue rather than green/purple CA. I've tried adjusting CA settings, but can't get rid of it, so I've cropped that part. Does that help? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 13:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 07:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 21:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 07:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[edit]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Museo Histórico Militar de Canarias 2023 403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Museo Histórico Militar de Canarias 2023 460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 875.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 879.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Appears to be leaning left (background and main plaque) - slight perspective adjustment required? --Scotch Mist 15:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good spot, I've redone the perspective using the plaque, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York 2017 51 - Marble grave stele.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good composition. --Nacaru 09:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armoury Towers, Macclesfield 2024 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 06:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]