User talk:Jbribeiro1/Lixo

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jbribeiro1!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

TUSC token 136204584324f44c647b366d8d3831f4[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Jbribeiro1!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joseph-barber-lightfoot.gif was uncategorized on 30 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Mariene Castro.jpg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Statue of Neo-Hittite King Tarhunza (Aslantepe).jpg was uncategorized on 7 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:38, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:180px-richard reitzenstein.jpg[edit]

File:180px-richard reitzenstein.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 02:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jbribeiro, a file from de.academic.ru/dic.nsf/dewiki/1182344 is from de.wikipedia. Thats the German Wikipedia. de.academic.ru is a mirror of various encyclopedias, including Wikipedia. This means you uploaded a file that we already have or had on our projects. You must check in de:Richard Reitzenstein what happened to this file and you will see that it was deleted. It was deleted because the claim that the author is "unknown" is untrue and that the author not died >70 years ago. I therfore ask you: Where do you take your informations from? You wrote that the author is unknown, what is your source for this information? --Martin H. (talk) 02:57, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notre Dame de Paris[edit]

Oi José Luiz, o facto da imagem estar tremida por si só normalmente não é razão para a eliminar. Se reparar, essa imagem em ponto mais pequeno, como eu coloquei ao lado, é até aceitável (e há técnicas para melhorar o blur artificialmente, eu mesmo já tenho usado algumas). Por outro lado, uma imagem esborratada mas que represente algo que não está em nenhuma das outras, é bastante valiosa, apesar da má qualidade. Em resumo, só deve mandar para eliminação se houver uma imagem muito semelhante de qualidade muito melhor, e imagem esborratada não mostrar nada de novo ou diferente.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 14:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PopeDioscorosI.jpg[edit]

File:PopeDioscorosI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Dúvida[edit]

Done pela Lucia Bot. Béria Lima ^msg 09:22, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vişne_suyu.jpg[edit]

File:Vişne_suyu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kelly (talk) 00:52, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Life_of_Mary_in_stained_glass_windows[edit]

Category:Life_of_Mary_in_stained_glass_windows has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PopeDioscorosI.jpg[edit]

File:PopeDioscorosI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Priene temple[edit]

Hi, thanks for categorizing those files of the temple in Priene. It seems you got a small mistake in the category name though: it should certainly be "temple of Athena", not "temple of Athens" (Athena is the goddess, Athens is the city). I've created a new Category:Temple of Athena in Priene and asked a bot to move the files there. Regards, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Gorg Preca (1).jpg[edit]

File:San Gorg Preca (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Jbribeiro1. You have new messages at DarwIn's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.

Mas eu volto, um dia, é para isso que ando a carregar esta tralha toda no Commons também.

Eu hoje até tenho andado por lá, a colocar nos artigos alguns achados arqueológicos que desenterrei aqui no Commons. :) -- Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Dúvida[edit]

Oi. Sim, é. Existe aqui no Commons Imagens de qualidade e Imagens especiais (acho que não tem mais nenhuma-comparado a artigo bom e destacado na Wikipédia). A página de votação para imagens de qualidade está aqui e a para imagens especiais aqui. O processo é parecido com o da Wikipédia (só que com regras diferentes, é claro), como mostrei acima, existem páginas de votações e os critérios estão em "Commons:Featured picture candidates#Nominating".Érico Wouters ^msg 01:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Help![edit]

Oi, ~~José Luiz Bernardes Ribeiro~~, fiquei mais parecido com a tua mãe? rs Sobre a imagem File:Cybistra map.JPG deve estar se referindo ao tamanho da letra do "Português do Brasil"? Érico Wouters ^msg 02:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Se for isso, é porque o idioma que escolhemos aqui no Commons é o português do Brasil. Fiz o teste, coloquei em inglês e ficou normal. Érico Wouters ^msg 02:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Se esqueceu (estou procurando a edição que você diz que além de sua mãe sou o único que não te chamo de "Zé", rs, não achei)? Na imagem, você deve fazer como ele fez (se você quiser, não acho necessário e explico a seguir)? Colocar uma seção com "Original upload log". Mas eu não vejo nenhum problema do jeito que fez, já que a imagem que mostrou do Stegop tem um número maior de imagens e ai sim precisa especificar, porque cada uma delas tem um licença diferente. Mas no teu caso as duas imagens tem licenças iguais e não precisa colocar um registro como aquela. Tua dúvida era essa? Érico Wouters ^msg 03:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eu nunca iria achar, estava procurando nos meus arquivos de mensagens. Boas, Érico Wouters ^msg 11:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:02, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Guerra de edições[edit]

Obrigado pelo bloqueio, mas consequentemente deveria também bloquear o Zorglub. Caso contrario esta "Guerra de Edições" só existe na tua cabeça.Cruks (talk) 07:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conforme deliberaram os colegas, complementando minha ação. Não sou um ditador e sim parte de um time. José Luiz ^disc 19:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Como é...[edit]

Oi, Zé. Usa {{Bad name}}, caso a categoria esteja com o nome errado. Existe o {{Category replaced}} para categorias que foram renomeadas e o {{Empty category}} para categorias vazias. Se quiser, também posso apagar sem ter marcado nenhuma marcação, já que não é necessário ter marcação para apagar alguma página. Abraços. Érico Wouters ^msg 23:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apagado. Até mais. Érico Wouters ^msg 14:29, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	I just wanted to thank you for all of the photo-related work you do here on Commons. Much thanks. Sumanah (talk) 12:32, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Segovia from the Alcazar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Althogh some part is in shadow it is readable --Moroder 19:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windows at Plaza Mayor - Madrid (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:00, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beylerbeyi Palace - Lion statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pós-processamento[edit]

Zé, vou colocar o meu chapéu do TrekEarth (onde por vezes são muito exigentes) e criticar as fotos que propuseste para destaque no Commons.

Realmente parece muito distorcida, mas parece distorção da própria lente, o que é estranho. Isso nunca tentei corrigir. Os meus colegas puristas do TrekEarth diriam que também tem problemas de sobreexposição (complicadíssimos de evitar neste caso) que não podem ser resolvidos.

Parece inclinada para a esquerda (isso resove-se facilmente), mas também parece ter a perspetiva ligeiramente distorcida; posso tentar corrigir isso, mas parece-me complicado pois aparentemente há distorção tanto na vertical como na horizontal.

Estaria muito boa se não fosse o corte (fatal!) à direita e o facto das linhas em arco em baixo cruzarem os bordos em alturas diferentes.

Esta parece-me muito bem, se bem que se pode dizer que se tivesses conseguido uma simetria perfeita (complicado, eu sei...) estaria ainda melhor. Se fosse uma foto de exterior poder-se-ia implicar com os highlights e a definição menos boa, mas para uma foto sem grandes meios acho que está "estupendíssima".

Acho que consigo corrigir a perspetiva, sim, mas a falta do rebordo à direita desequilibra a composição.

Se ainda não tiver perdido o jeito acho que consigo corrigir a perspetiva e apagar o malfadado fio no canto.

PS: Tens algumas fotos espetaculares. Uma delas é, sem dúvida, File:Segovia from the Alcazar.JPG, que até me dá vontade de ir traduzir o artigod e Segóvia ou da sua catedral. :D

Abç. --Stegop (talk) 02:00, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Eleusa[edit]

Hi, Jbribeiro1, are you sure, that this category is applicable for paintings, which are no icons? en:Eleusa icon Same question for Category:Pelagonitissa, best wishes––Oursana (talk) 01:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Filemover[edit]

Oi, Jbribeiro. Você teria que abrir um pedido aqui, mas seria uma perda de tempo porque igualmente eu iria fechar o pedido. Então já antecipei esse trabalho. Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Jbribeiro1, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Érico Wouters ^msg 00:10, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Como você chegou as 20.000 edições?! Foi muito rápido! Érico Wouters ^msg 00:15, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sim, conheço e acho que tenho. Tenho que arrumar o tapete do banheiro antes de dormir se não eu não dormo. E também tenho que fechar as portas do ropeiro. Além de outras manias e desgraças. Pra escrever uma mensagem qualquer para um outro usuário eu demoro um tempão ás vezes arrumando palavras, vírgulas e pontos. Mas não me considero com muitos sintomas da doença, apenas poucos. Minha irmã quer ser psicóloga e talvez ela me cure! Boa sorte e abraço. Érico Wouters ^msg 00:31, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias[edit]

por tu ayuda! --Hubertl (talk) 22:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC) obrigado pela vossa ajuda (Google translate!) --Hubertl (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ceiling of the Church of Sagrario - Granada (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impressive but very noisy. Description is way too simple (geocoding & english description would be welcome). --Selbymay 10:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done Jbribeiro1 13:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bit grainy but ok. Mattbuck 11:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Mezquita from Calahorra Tower - Córdoba (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:46, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-John in Ephesus (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:18, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 'Camel' in Devrent (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. (I like the scale made by the other photograph :-) English description would be welcome. --Selbymay 08:37, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done Jbribeiro1 22:26, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! León - City walls (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 14:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of León - White Virgin on the Door of the Judgement (west facade).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:52, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:VDA[edit]

Oi, Jbribeiro. Sim, é um VDA do Flickr. O bot erra às vezes, e também pode ser que um usuário carregou a imagem a partir do bot, o que é possível usando alguns programas. Érico Wouters ^msg 21:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Floor plan - Cathedral of Seville.JPG[edit]

File:Floor plan - Cathedral of Seville.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gunnex (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Jbribeiro1. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Igreja e Mosteiro de São Vicente de Fora from Miradouro das Portas do Sol.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mudejar_Pavillion_-_Parque_María_Luisa_-_Seville_(6).JPG[edit]

Hola Jbribeiro1, puedo subir una versión de está imagen , en la cual le hice una correción de la perspectiva.

Saludos, --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:59, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mudejar Pavillion - Parque María Luisa - Seville (6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Granada[edit]

Boas Zé.

Já estás mais calmo?

Quando terminares, ainda que temporariamente, o trabalho de categorização em Granada, diz-me, pois eu tinha começado a fazer isso no outro dia a pretexto de escolher imagens para pt:Granada (Espanha) (que se arranjar alento talvez venha a propor para destaque), mas duas pessoas a fazerem o mesmo só se atrapalham. E, já agora, se tiveres sugestões de boas fotos, podes ir fazendo uma lista. A minha ideia era fazer algo que cheguei a tentar em Istambul (ver nesta cat, a pretexto da ilustração do artigo, mas depois fartei-me: criar umas quantas páginas com as fotos que me pareciam melhores para ser mais fácil escolher. Se quiseres ajudar...

Um grande abraço. --Stegop (talk) 23:25, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fala Stegop! Estou, mas o resultado do destilamento do meu ódio foi que eu só quero mesmo é vingança, o que é péssimo. Apesar de ter voltado a vigiar minhas páginas - e o número de reversões quadruplicou - não tenho vontade nenhuma de interagir lá. Zero e quero que se explodam...rs.. Uma pena, pois eu tava animado pra ensinar pra essa gente como é a tarefa de construção de consenso. Sobre o tema aqui, estou revisando as igrejas, castelos e torres na Andalusia e só Almería deve tomar hoje e amanhã. Assim, até eu chegar em Granada vai mais um tempo. Agora, se for tentar destacar o artigo lá, me avisa. E vou sim ver umas fotinhos aqui. Agora uma coisa: tentei baixar o tal do GIMP e ele acabou de vez com a minha auto-estima: me senti um jumento tentando decolar um helicóptero, pois demorei uns minutos (literalmente) pra abrir umas fotos. Será que tem uns cursos no Youtube pra isso? Pelamordedeus... E obrigado pela tua mensagem (aqui e no email). José Luiz ^disc 23:34, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

É... O GIMP não é "pera doce", não! Mas para mim, depois de ter lido um livrinho (Beginning GIMP, Fom Novice to Profesional, de Akkana Peck) e ter usada um par de anos, parece-me que não é pior do que o Photoshop, que cada vez que tenho que usar passo 2/3 do tempo para encontrar a ferramenta que procuro e também é tudo menos intuitivo. Se estivesses mais perto emprestava-te o livro de boa vontade, apesar de já estar desatualizado (já estava quando o comprei e certamente que agora ainda está mais), mas o que é complicado mesmo não muda: os conceitos, que ao que sei não são diferentes do Photoshop, embora tenha a impressão que este último tem o que eles chamam filtros mais potentes que permitem que se faça muita coisa sem perceber as bases nem conceitos complicados.

Se vais demorar uns dias até chegar a Granada, talvez vá adiantando alguma coisa. À parte das fotos e das partes mais chatas (Economia, infraestruturas, etc., que os nossos colegas das EAD's de cidades tanto valorizam), o texto de pt:Granada (Espanha) já está pronto. Ou seja: já traduzi o artigo da ES e agora falta referenciar os trechos sem fontes, mas esta parte pode inviabilizar o destaque, como me aconteceu em pt:Djerba e acho que me vai acontecer com pt:Civilização cartaginesa, dois excelentes artigos cujas extensas bibliografias quase de certeza cobrem todo o texto, pois pelo estilo de escrita percebe-se que envolveram muito estudo, mas que, como é frequente com os FR's e ES's, têm muitos parágrafos e até secções inteiras sem notas de rodapé.

PS: espero que o teu abandono da PT.WP não inclua o domínio principal. --Stegop (talk) 00:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sobre o DP na ptwiki, to trabalhando internamente. Tentei hoje começar a ajudar o Rena e o Pedrassani com a tradução do Maañón nas Guerras romano-persas, mas desisti em cinco minutos. Incrível como esse negócio do Captcha mexeu comigo... Três anos na wiki, 18 anos em banco de investimento e o que me irritou foi o captcha.... José Luiz ^disc 00:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Puerta Palos - Puerta de campanillas (Catedral de Sevilla)[edit]

Buenos días, discúlpeme que le hable en español pero no se portugués. Me dirijo a usted para manifestarle que dentro de la catedral de Sevilla, Cathedral of Seville, facade east existen dos puertas diferentes Puerta de campanillas (que representa la entrada de Jesús en Jerusalén, montado en un burro) y otra diferente denominada Puerta de Palos (que representa la adoración de los reyes magos) (Véase el artículo de la catedral en la wikipedia en español. Creo que usted ha integrado las fotografías de ambas puertas dentro de la categoría denominada Puerta de campanillas. De igual manera ha cambiado el nombre a la fotografías de la puerta de palos, redenominándolas como puerta de campanillas. Aquí le expongo un ejemplo de lo expuesto. Le pediría que volviera a renombrar los ficheros citados.

Un saludo

--Anual (talk) 12:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Facade of Sé do Porto (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 17:49, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Detail from the east face of the Obelisk of Theodosius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:19, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Apollo in Didyma (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 12:33, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5.2 Temple of Memmius in Ephesus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality ("monument of Memmius" would be a better description though). --Jastrow 12:33, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photo permission requested[edit]

Hello Jose, I would like to recommend the use of your photo of the Mary geneaology dome at the Chora museum (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Genealogy_of_Mary_mosaic_at_Chora.jpg) in a textbook, Old Testament Today, to be published by Zondervan. The publisher would prefer not to be bound by the Share Alike component in the CC-BY-SA license (CC-BY would be fine) so if you would agree to let us use your photo I will need a statement from you granting permission outside of that license. Picture would be interior, probably 1/4 to 1/2 a page. Print run is 25,000. Non-exclusive world rights are requested for all languages, formats, and all editions both print and electronic. I also need to know how you would like the credit line to read. Thank you very much for considering my request. If you would like to contact me directly for more details, use waltonimagesupply@gmail.com I will receive no payment for the use of your photo. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Kim Walton

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balloons over Goreme.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. Mattbuck 17:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Estrela" versus "Estrella"[edit]

Hi José Luiz, you re-categorized my image of that madonna statue in the Seville cathedral to a category named "Virgen de la Estrela (Cathedral of Seville)". Shouldn't the category be named "Virgen de la Estrella", with two "l"? My Spanish is very basic and you are an experienced Commons editor with an Iberian background. Maybe you can make the right decision.--Rabe! (talk) 07:16, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Views_of_Igreja_de_Sao_Domingos,_Lisbon[edit]

Views of Igreja de Sao Domingos, Lisbon has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ 14:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Interior_of_Igreja_de_Sao_Domingos,_Lisbon[edit]

Interior of Igreja de Sao Domingos, Lisbon has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ 14:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Exterior_of_Igreja_de_Sao_Domingos,_Lisbon[edit]

Exterior of Igreja de Sao Domingos, Lisbon has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ 14:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the same.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Detail from the south face of the Obelisk of Theodosius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portico - Madinat al-Zahra (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments see note --A.Savin 14:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Jbribeiro1 22:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 16:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

⧼Wikibase-terms/Lixo⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Furniture from Casa Lleó Morera in the MNAC[edit]

Hi José Luiz! You're doing a great contribution in subcategorizing buildings in Barcelona, congratulations! But there is something about what I'm doubtful. In Category:Interior of Casa Lleó Morera there are some pics that are not from the inside of the house itself, but showing furniture from this house but showed in the Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya: 126 Saló del pis principal de la casa Lleó Morera.jpg, 127 Mobiliari modernista de Gaspar Homar, de la casa Lleó Morera.jpg, 137 Bufet de la casa Lleó Morera, de Gaspar Homar.jpg, GasparHomar mobles 4127.JPG, Homar Lleo Morera 8170.jpg and Homar Lleo Morera 8176.jpg. I think the would be better in a the general category Casa Lleó Morera or in a new one, somewhat Furniture from Casa Lleó Morera in the MNAC or similar. What do you think about? --Enfo (talk) 09:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Enfo, you're right and it's

Done. Thank you! José Luiz ^disc 12:43, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Are you from Barcelona? I'm having trouble identifying a couple of buildings I photographed and perhaps you can help me!

Hi again! I'm not born in Barcelona strictly but in Terrassa (30 km away, NE from the city), not far as you can see, but I live in Barcelona since 2003. I've photographed thousands of buildings in the city, then I think I can help you with these unidentified pictures if you give me some additional information. Which are they? --Enfo (talk) 08:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you don't know the lists of monuments in the Catalan Viquipèdia go to Llista de monuments de Barcelona, with lists of the items included in the catalogue of protected buildings of the city, divided by districts. --Enfo (talk) 09:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

Hallo Jbribeiro1. You are right, it is a Murex pecten. The "Long shell" is a Tibia fusus. The "Nautilus" is a Cephalopod of the genus Nautilus [1]. The depicted shell is halved and you can see the chambers inside. I suppose, it is a Nautilus pompilius, for it is the most common species and the shell is often sold as halved shell. But as there exist some other (more rare) species, one should have a look at the outside of the shell to confirm the determination. Greetings --Llez (talk) 16:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chimneys of Casa Batlló - Barcelona 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unión y el Fénix building - Barcelona 2014 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old boiler - Casa Milà - Barcelona 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:14, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chimney - Roof of Casa Milà - Barcelona 2014 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Internal courtyard - Casa Milà - Barcelona 2014 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Isiwal 16:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bosses and reliefs of Cathedral of Barcelona[edit]

You have removed author categories from images of reliefs and bosses of Cathedral of Barcelona and put author categories in general categories of bosses and back choir reliefs, but:

There are about 250 bosses in the Cathedral, made in various centuries. Not all them are from Pere Joan.
Not all back choir reliefs are made by Bartolomé Ordóñez.

Therefore, please revert those changes or organize categories in another way in order to keep in every sculptor categories his works and only his works.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sobre o trascoro, você pode ver ca:Catedral_de_Barcelona#Rerecor (o a tradução d'una versão mais antiga pt:Catedral_de_Barcelona#Rerecor). Bartolomé Ordoñez projectou o trascoro, mais solo esculpiu dois dos quatro releves do trascoro, e una das duas esculturas. Eu suponho que é suficientemente certo ter o trascoro na categoria de Bartolomé Ordóñez, e cada releve na categoria do trascoro e a categoria do seu escultor.

E cuidado que isto é valido para o releve do trascoro. O conjunto do coro (com os laterais e o cadeiral) é d'outros escultores e d'outras épocas.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:15, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Malagrida - Barcelona 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please add an english description.--XRay 06:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Jbribeiro1 13:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall lamp of Farmàcia Bolós - Barcelona 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality., with acceptable noise, 800 ISO. --Cayambe 11:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of Casa Batló - Barcelona 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow, what the hell.... --Mattbuck 00:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposta em QI[edit]

Não sei se entendo exatamente o que você diz na proposta da imagem (File:General view of the ceilings - Interior of Sagrada Família - Barcelona 2014 (crop).jpg) a QI. Se é que entendi (meu inglês é muito ruim), o bordo (ou a borda, pois não distingo entre uma palavra e outra) não tem nada a ver com direitos de autor. Qualquer esclarecimento ou coisa que necessite, conte comigo tanto em português como em espanhol. Eu escrevo melhor em espanhol, mas você pode escrever em qualquer das duas línguas, pois entendo muito bem.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 00:20, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fiz o comentário porque teoricamente uma imagem com borda não pode ser QI. Nem sequer pode manter-se em Commons.

Eu não me atrevo a comentar fotos tão difíceis de tomar como esta se não as vejo perfeitas. Nunca ou quase nunca as declino, pois há usuários habituados a fazer imagens desse tipo.

Peço desculpas pelo transtorno--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 00:25, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamenting Peter - Sagrada Familia - Barcelona 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:30, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category "Gardens of Palau Nacional (Barcelona)"[edit]

Hi! This category must be deleted, because Palau Nacional has not gardens. None of these three pics in the category belong to these gardens: the first one belongs to Jardins de Joan Maragall; the second one it's the big square between Estadi Olímpic Lluís Companys and Palau Sant Jordi; the third one show the fountains in the stair under the MNAC. --Enfo (talk) 20:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rose window - Basilica de Santa Maria del Mar - Barcelona 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image nomination[edit]

Jbribeiro1,

I reverted your edit just now because it was an incomplete nomination of File:Monestir de St. Benedict (Sant Benet) de Montserrat - Montserrat 2014 (2).JPG.[2] Please follow all the steps of Commons:Valued_image_candidates#How_to_nominate_an_image_or_a_set_of_images_for_VI_status. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monestir de St. Benedict (Sant Benet) de Montserrat - Montserrat 2014 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massacre of the Innocents - Nativity Facade - Sagrada Família - Barcelona 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 10:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Grafitti na França[edit]

	Hello, Jbribeiro1. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Nîmes-Arènes-Emblème de Rome-20130923.jpg[edit]

Bonjour José Luiz,
Vous avec déplacé File:Nîmes-Arènes-Emblème de Rome-20130923.jpg dans une sous catégorie dans la la catégorie Category:Stairs and corridors of the Arènes de Nîmes sauf que ma photo correctement internationalisé et géo-positionnée indique clairement que l' emblème de Rome se trouve sur un pilier de l'enceinte extérieure, au nord. Je crains que si vous voulez déloger Rémus et Romulus ne réclament une catégorie pour eux, tout seuls !....
Cordialement
--Daniel Villafruela (talk) 06:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nîmes-Arènes-Emblème de Rome-20130923.jpg[edit]

Bonjour José Luiz,
Vous avec déplacé File:Nîmes-Arènes-Emblème de Rome-20130923.jpg dans la catégorie Category:Stairs and corridors of the Arènes de Nîmes sauf que ma photo correctement internationalisé et géo-positionnée indique clairement que l' emblème de Rome se trouve sur un pilier de l'enceinte extérieure, au nord. Je crains que si vous voulez déloger Rémus et Romulus ne réclament une catégorie pour eux, tout seuls !....
Cordialement
--Daniel Villafruela (talk) 06:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boules[edit]

Hi Dvillafruela,

I was wondering if you could help me identify this game (more: 1, 2, 3), played regularly in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nîmes. Is it Sport-boules? Merci beaucoup!! José Luiz ^disc 00:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No ! In the small place of the Quai de la fontaine was played the sort of game named Pétanque. There is a différence with the sport boule named Je Sport-boules or Jeu lyonnais where the ball is thrown after a run up of three steps.

Have a good day.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulpit - Cathédrale Notre-Dame-et-Saint-Castor - Nîmes 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 16:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Louis (IX) of France - Cathédrale Notre-Dame-et-Saint-Castor - Nîmes 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 16:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Jbribeiro1,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balconies - Monaco 2014 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Destaque na ptwiki[edit]

	Hello, Jbribeiro1. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of Pisa from Piazza Arcivescovado - Pisa 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perpective correction necessary ... haha, I'm joking ... It's a QI of course. --Cccefalon 20:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral and Campanary - Pisa 2014 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:40, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal - Église Saint-Paul de Nîmes - Nîmes 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:07, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loggia - Leaning Tower of Pisa - Pisa 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments tilted! --Ralf Roletschek 11:09, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calvary - Inner court - Camposanto - Pisa 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 04:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dom Mayer em cerimônia de coroação da Virgem Maria.jpg[edit]

File:Dom Mayer em cerimônia de coroação da Virgem Maria.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Being discussed in the image's DP. José Luiz ^disc 21:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tympanum - Facade - Duomo - Pisa 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 06:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Putti - Piazza dei Miracoli - Pisa 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Hi. You categorize a chapel under altar pieces and under church sculptures. Why? They are different concepts and hierarchies. A chapel is a building, a piece of architecture. Altars and sculptures are not architectural elements but mobiliary, furniture, etc. Explain your criteria, please. --Zarateman (talk) 16:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of arms - Santa Maria delle Grazie - Milan 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is good for QI; however I had raised the blacks and sharpness a little bit. --Cccefalon 05:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset - Harbour of Genoa seen from Piazzale di San Francesco D'Assisi - Genoa 2014 (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:08, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II - Milan 2014 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 00:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barred window - Castelo Sforzesco - Milan 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II (Milan) - Milan 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment The images needs perspective correction.--XRay 09:56, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done New version uploaded. Jbribeiro1 00:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --XRay 15:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to Giuseppe Parini - Milan 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment The images needs perspective correction.--XRay 09:56, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done New version uploaded. Jbribeiro1 00:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --XRay 15:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of San Gottardo in Corte from the courtyard of Palazzo Reale - Milan 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I cannot say that I like the roof in the front, but nethertheless it's gGood quality. --Cccefalon 15:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of San Gottardo in Corte from the Duomo - Milan 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 08:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of arms of House of Sforza - Castelo Sforzesco - Milan 2014 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 08:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monestir de St. Benedict (Sant Benet) de Montserrat - Montserrat 2014 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset - Harbour of Genoa seen from Piazzale di San Francesco D'Assisi - Genoa 2014 (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ah, I'll go with it. --Mattbuck 16:36, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gargoyle - St Nazaire - Carcassonne 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014 (3).jpg[edit]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014 (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pietà - Main portal - Duomo - Milan 2014.jpg[edit]

File:Pietà - Main portal - Duomo - Milan 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014 (2).jpg[edit]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014 (4).jpg[edit]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014 (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:34, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014.jpg[edit]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:34, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014 (4).jpg[edit]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014 (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:35, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unicredit Tower from the Duomo - Milan 2014.jpg[edit]

File:Unicredit Tower from the Duomo - Milan 2014.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014 (2).jpg[edit]

File:Bronze door - Duomo - Milan 2014 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Detail - Bronze door - Stained glass window - Duomo - Milan 2014 (3).jpg[edit]

File:Detail - Bronze door - Stained glass window - Duomo - Milan 2014 (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Detail - Bronze door - Stained glass window - Duomo - Milan 2014 (2).jpg[edit]

File:Detail - Bronze door - Stained glass window - Duomo - Milan 2014 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Detail - Bronze door - Stained glass window - Duomo - Milan 2014 (4).jpg[edit]

File:Detail - Bronze door - Stained glass window - Duomo - Milan 2014 (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Detail - Bronze door - Stained glass window - Duomo - Milan 2014.jpg[edit]

File:Detail - Bronze door - Stained glass window - Duomo - Milan 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torre Velasca from the Duomo - Milan 2014 (2).jpg[edit]

File:Torre Velasca from the Duomo - Milan 2014 (2).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 01:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torre Velasca from the Duomo - Milan 2014.jpg[edit]

File:Torre Velasca from the Duomo - Milan 2014.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User:G.dallorto (talk) 01:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of panorama in Italy[edit]

Hallo JBribeiro, you shoot marvellous images, but it is important for you to know that when in Italy you may not upload to WikiCommons images of works of arts whose artists have died less than 70 years ago, including architectural works, since Italy has no Freedom of Panorama. Sorry, it's a pity, but this is a problem for us as well. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 02:46, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regret to have uploaded..[edit]

Boas Zé.

Não percebo... Há umas semanas dizias-me para colocar aqui todas as minhas fotos e agora isso? Isto é uma rabaldaria, se calhar ainda maior que a PT.WP? Lá isso é, mas qual é a novidade? Por isso mesmo é que a Fotopedia me atraiu mais, mas está algo estagnada (não completamente, mas não acelera). Falto lá eu, kkkk :D

Também não percebo o teu conselho para colocar nas wikipédias: além de qq. um poder e dever mover as licenças compatíveis, qual é a diferença em relação ao tal "controlo" do upload original?

Se estás interessado em sites colaborativos de fotos, sugiro que dês uma vista de olhos, alem da fotopedia, ao http://www.trekearth.com e ao http://photofolia.net/ . Este último foi formado por dois dissidentes do trekearth, um brasileiro e um teuto-suíço brasileiro de adoção, mas está descansado que aquilo não está invadido de brasileiros.

Abç. --Stegop (talk) 17:49, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tantrum meu, provavelmente provocado pela intervenção infeliz do Sargenton num tema que envolvia 3000 fotos minhas alteradas de forma rude pelo Fastily... Sobre o keep local, faço referência ao movimento (cada vez mais forte) que exige que o controle sobre as imagens seja feito não por um guardião central, burocrático e tecnocrático, e sim pelas comunidades locais. Assim, se os lusófonos quiserem "tit flashes" e os americanos não, cada um decide o que pode ou não ser deletado (no meu caso, foda-se se os anglófonos decidiram que en-BR e en-US são idênticos aqui, se os lusófonos decidirem que pt-PT e pt-BR são diferentes, so be it e não vai ser um grupinho de analfabetos em português que vai decidir isso - ponto crucial do meu tantrum). A minha discussão mostra que o Commons não está disposto a fazer discussões "locais" - apesar dos poucos sysops lusófonos que chamei - por que isso é trabalhoso e, do ponto de vista burocrático, isso faz todo sentido ("priorize-se o que dá mais trabalho"). Mas, do ponto de vista das minorias, não faz sentido algum. Eu pedi dez vezes a intervenção de um sysop que falasse português ou que entendesse minimamente a realidade da ptwiki (coisa que o Sargenton há muito não entende, tanto que é bloqueado sempre que aparece lá...). Nada. Como diz meu pai, a "média" é pros "medíocres".... Tô fora dessa política de "complacência", apesar de duvidar que exista algum outro remédio.... José Luiz ^disc 02:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Uma medalha para você![edit]

Muito obrigado! --Hameryko (talk) 09:36, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Milan from the Duomo - Milan 2014 (2).jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 00:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove warnings[edit]

català ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello. This is a reminder for you that it is important to address the identified issues instead of simply removing legitimate warnings and notices from your talk page. Removing messages does not remove them from the talk page's history. You are encouraged instead to archive past discussions according to our community guidelines. You can have this done automatically for you -- simply place {{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}} or {{subst:autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and then old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details). If you have received warnings for copyright issues, please familiarize yourself with our policy on licensing. You can also ask for help at the village pump or the help desk if you need assistance.

FDMS 4 02:20, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]