User talk:Jastrow/Archives/2013/March

Cat move requests

Salu Jastrow. S.v.p. peux-tu jeter un coup d'oeil à User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands ? Un user a fait demande à Delinker de changer les nom à beaucoup de catégories artistiques, qui sortent la plus part de la synthaxe qu'on a applié jusqu'a ce moment. Merci beaucoup. --DenghiùComm (talk) 13:19, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Petites questions sur le Louvre

Bonjour Jastrow, comme tu le sais peut-être wikidata: est partiellement opérationnel, et l'on peut désormais ajouter des infos sur les objets de musée, tout au moins ceux qui ont un article sur Wikipédia. Ca m'amène à me poser quelques questions un peu bébêtes :

• Qui doit-on considérer comme le propriétaire des objets du Louvre, l'Etat, le musée, les différents départements ? Et si l'on ne considère pas les départements comme des propriétaires, de quoi doit-on les qualifier ?
• question particulièrement métaphysique : il vaut mieux mettre des petits points dans les numéros d'inventaire, comme Atlas (M.R. 722) ou bien ne pas en mettre comme Joconde (MA 732) ?

Bonne journée, --Zolo (talk) 09:08, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Légalement les objets (hors prêts, dépôts de musées non publics, etc.) font partie du domaine public de l'État ; le Louvre en assure la gestion par délégation. Après je ne sais pas ce qu'il faut déclarer dans ce champ. Est-ce qu'il y a un autre moyen pour déclarer le fait que le Louvre les stocke physiquement, les gère et tout ? (Je ne connais rien à Wikidata).

Sur les petits points, je ne sais pas trop. Les catalogues du Louvre que j'ai (Sculptures grecques, Orient romain et byzantin au Louvre) n'en mettent pas. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata, c'est une base de données qui fonctionne un peu dans le style des infoboxes de Wikipédia, sauf qu'on a pas un type de boîte bien défini pour chaque thème : on peut ajouter les champs qu'on veut, là où on veut. Pour l'instant, c'est encore assez vide, mais si on a besoin d'un champ "affectation", ou même d'un qui distingue le domaine public du domaine privé de l'Etat, c'est très facile à créer. Pour le lieu, il me semble qu'il vaudrait mieux avoir une propriété spécifique qui puisse aussi être utilisée pour dire que la colonne de Juillet se trouve place de la Bastille. Vu que Wikidata est bien structurée, on pourrait même imaginer des mises à jour automatiques pendant les expos, mais là je m'emballe sans doute un peu... --Zolo (talk) 19:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

En fait, ce qui me chiffonne un peu, ce sont les oeuvres qui sont marquée comme collection du Louvre, mais qui sont ailleurs (du genre comme ça). Tu aurais un idée de comment on peut appeler les différents champs nécessaires pour ça ? Et puis si t'as le temps de passer voir la page Wikidata, il y aurait Wikidata:Property_proposal#Current_location. J'imagine qu'un jour ça pourrait remplacer une bonne partie des template:Artwork de Commons. --Zolo (talk) 19:29, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Set of extension tubes Canon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality Pleclown 12:47, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Final Challenge International de Saint-Maur 2013 t171957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 07:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romania v France Challenge international de Saint-Maur 2013 t143414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 16:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szasz v Shin Challenge International de Saint-Maur 2013 t154844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:07, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branza v Geroudet Challenge International de Saint-Maur 2013 t160541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 17:17, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Italy v Estonia Challenge international de Saint-Maur 2013 t142226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 11:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Semi-final Avola v Baldini Challenge International de Paris 2013 ts182251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality with a nice composition. Pymouss 16:06, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

{{Louvre number}}

Juste une petite note pour dire que j'ai réécrit {{Louvre number}} qui était devenu presque ingérable. Les noms de paramètres sont supprimés : on écrit {{Louvre number|INV 320|MA 23}} au lieu de {{Louvre number|INV= 320| MA = 22}}. --Zolo (talk) 10:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Cool, merci ! C'est case-sensitive ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:44, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Oui, et aussi "dot-sensitive". Lua devrait permettre plus de souplesse, mais je n'ai pas encore trouvé comment faire. En fait, je me suis énervé pendant une heure sur une fonction expliquée dans la documentation jusqu'à ce que je vois qu'elle n'était pas encore en service... --Zolo (talk) 10:52, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Inventaire du Louvre

Bonjour Jastrow,

JÄNNICK Jérémy a entrepris de mettre en place l'inventaire du Louvre par salle, et en mettant en place le modèle {{Object photo}} dans les photos de Inventory Louvre/Near eastern antiquities, j'ai vu que dans différentes photos prises par toi, la licence n'est pas la même (voir File:Nilotic juglet Louvre AM569.jpg et File:Cylinder seal antelope Louvre AM1639.jpg. Question de date de prise de vue, sans doute ?

Pendant que je reporte tes références pour la prise de vue, veux-tu que j'en profite pour uniformiser tes licences ? ou est-ce que ça ne se fait pas ?

en tous cas, si tu veux, n'hésite pas à me contacter, si jamais je faisais des erreurs sur tes fichiers ), des photos magnifiques…

Cordialement, --Hsarrazin (talk) 18:46, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szasz v Embrich Challenge International de Saint-Maur 2013 t162817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Pitie-Salpetriere under snow 2013-03-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments When pixel-peeping the D800E does, as expected, produce a bit of color artefacts on the tiles of the center building, but I don't consider that critical. Even after crop the resolution and sharpness are ridiculous. --D4m1en 11:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC) *The traffic signs are not round anymore but like eggs.--Hic et nunc 15:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Wide-angle lens problem. I uploaded a new version with some perspective correction. The traffic signs are now round. Is it better? --Jastrow 15:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Much better.--Hic et nunc 15:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branza v Geroudet Challenge International de Saint-Maur 2013 t161016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI. --Selbymay 13:53, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Final Challenge international de Paris 2013-01-26 193155.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Final Challenge international de Paris 2013-01-26 193155.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

J'ai trouvé ce message sur ma page mais je pense qu'il te revient :) --PierreSelim (talk) 17:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cattleya Beaumesnil Parme 1001 Orchids.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. --Myrabella 07:26, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Harbour seen from Triq Girolamo Cassar n02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks good, only one light spot on the sky. --Iifar 11:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Should be spotless now. --Jastrow 11:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC) Good quality now. --NorbertNagel 22:04, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romania v France Challenge international de Saint-Maur 2013 t141426.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice parade, great shot of a team match --PierreSelim 11:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romania v France Challenge international de Saint-Maur 2013 t143403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just about ok. --Mattbuck 13:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Palazzo Loredan dell'Ambasciatore 2010-09-13.jpg

Bonjour, ce n'est pas la bonne détermination. Si j'ai un moment je vais essayé de me souvenir quel est ce palais. Bonne journée... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

• C'est le Cavalli Franchetti. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)