User talk:François Malo-Renault

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Image without license[edit]

File:Jeune fille au Chat , Pastel EMR MdeB.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 05:02, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Émile Malo-Renault Category:Musée de Bretagne Category:Public domain

Bonjour,
@Themightyquill and Fab5669:

Je ne sais pas comment faire pour modifier la licence qui devrait être : CC0 don universel au domaine public.
Cordialement.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Domaine public © à la place de la licence CC BY SA.[edit]

Bonjour,
Comment mettre (ou faire mettre) : Domaine public © à la place de la licence CC BY SA pour les photos des estampes et des pastels d’Émile Malo-Renault (1870-1938) qui sont sous :Category:Émile Malo-Renault de Wikimedia Commons.
Merci.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 13:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment organiser (structurer) en pages media d'une catégorie[edit]

Bonjour,
La catégorie "Émile Malo-Renault" comprend 74 fichiers. Comment créer des sous catégories ou pages : Estampes, Pastels, Livres illustré etc..
cordialement,--François Malo-Renault (talk) 10:16, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Erreur évidente: ::Émile Malo-Renault (1870-1338)→Category:Émile Malo-Renault) , pourquoi créer une catégorie François Malo-Renault?[edit]

Bonjour,
@Fab5669 and Daehan:

Erreur évidente :Émile Malo-Renault (1870-1338)→Category:Émile Malo-Renault.

Émile Auguste Renault(1870-1938), nom d'artiste Malo Renault ou aussi Émile Malo-Renault.
Je ne vois pas pourquoi il faudrait créer une catégorie François Malo-Renault.

Cordialement,--François Malo-Renault (talk) 16:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Je ne comprends pas ta dernière remarque, puisque cette catégorie n'existe pas.
Par contre, Category:Émile Malo-Renault (1870-1338) a été renommée Category:Émile Malo-Renault, c'est ça ?
C'est parce que :
  1. Il n'y a pas d'autres Émile Malo-Renault, donc les parenthèses sont inutiles ;
  2. Il y avait une erreur dans la date de décès.
Cordialement, --Daehan (talk) 16:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Carte de l' expo L'Estampe en Bretagne, e.f; Malo-Renault, MdePA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.204.241.206 00:28, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour votre collaboration.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 10:47, 13 November 2018 (UTC) @Daehan: [reply]


Catégorisations Malo-Renault[edit]

Bonjour,
Je me permets ces quelques lignes pour vous expliquer quelques subtilités de catégorisations, qui m'ont vu reprendre quelques-unes de vos modifications. Les modèles "Creator" sont des modèles destinés à donner des informations sur l'artiste créateur d'une œuvre. Il existe déjà un Creator:Malo-Renault, la page Creator:Émile Malo-Renault fait donc doublon. Les pages "Help", sont des pages d'aide de la médiathèque. Je ne comprend pas ce que vous avez voulu faire avec Help:Émile Malo-Renault, en remplaçant d'ailleurs Category:Works by Émile Malo-Renault‎, qui servaient à catégoriser les œuvres de l'artiste. J'ai donc recréé cette catégorie, et recatégorisé les images derrière vous. Il n'est pas utile, au contraire, de trop catégorisé : une image dans la Category:Works by Émile Malo-Renault‎ est nécessairement déjà incluse dans Category:Émile Malo-Renault‎. Cela permet de conserver des catégories accessibles, plutôt que des galeries de centaines de photos. D'où d'ailleurs par exemple, la création de Category:La Petite chatte, qui permet d'avoir sous une même entrée toutes les images se rapportant à cette œuvre.
Je reste à votre disposition pour en parler plus avant. Cordialement, --Fab5669 (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Je comprends que vous ayez la crainte de faire perdre en visibilité les fichiers que vous importez. Mais, il me semble plus pertinent, et ce d'autant que les fichiers sont de plus en plus nombreuse, d'être le plus précis possible (quelqu'un qui chercherait une photo de l'artiste mettra ainsi beaucoup moins de temps à trouver son bonheur parmi les peut-être actuellement 80 fichiers de la catégorie). Mais peut-être est-ce l'anglais qui vous perturbe ? La Category:Works by Émile Malo-Renault, qu'on pourrait traduire par Œuvres d'Émile Malo-Renault, aurait ainsi vocation à regrouper la production de l'artiste. La catégorie-mère Category:Malo-Renault recenserait alors uniquement les représentations (photos, peintures...) de l'artiste (notons qu'un autoportrait serait ainsi dans les deux catégories). Il est effectivement possible de catégoriser plus finement les œuvres de l'artiste par média : l'on pourrait imaginer des catégories Category:Drawings by Émile Malo-Renault (dessins par Malo-Renault), Category:Engravings by Émile Malo-Renault (gravures de Malo-Renault), Category:Paintings by Émile Malo-Renault (peintures de Malo-Renault)... Cordialement, --Fab5669 (talk) 16:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Fab5669 and Daehan: ,
Je ne me suis donc mal fait comprendre: le fait d'avoir créé la catégorie Works by Émile Malo-Renault n'a pas permis de diminuer le nombre de fichiers de cette sous-catégorie. Alors que la catégorie racine n'a que un ou deux fichier(s), qui eux sont les seuls visibles directement. Je pense que les amateurs (s'il y en a encore pour cet 'art mineur'?) sont capables d'utiliser les catégories: estampe, pastel, illustration etc... qui sont précisés (individuellement) dans chaque fichiers. Et donc je vous demande de bien vouloir remonter les fichiers de Works by Émile Malo-Renault dans: Média dans la catégorie <<Malo-Renault>> (visible directement) . Et s'il a quelques fichiers peu intéressant ou faisant doublon je peu essayer de demander la suppression?
je vais essayer de montrer par comparaison l'effet des différents types de catégorisation (si cette copie d'écran ci-dessous est autorisé?):

File:Category graveur en couleur, copie d'ecran
Copie d'ecran: exempe de catégorie

Cordialement. --François Malo-Renault (talk) 06:03, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re-bonjour @Fab5669 and Daehan: ,
Suite comme la copie d'écran n'a pas marchée, j'ai fait une copie-collée classique de cet exemple, la Category:Graveur en couleur:

Cette catégorie comprend 8 sous-catégories, dont les 8 ci-dessous. C

   Mary Cassatt‎ (14 C, 3 P, 252 F)

D

   Gilles Demarteau‎ (1 C, 1 P, 65 F)

L

   Jakob Christof Le Blon‎ (1 P, 17 F)

M

Malo-Renault‎ (2 C, 1 F)

   Nori Malo-Renault‎ (1 F)

O

   Emil Orlik‎ (3 C, 2 P, 94 F)

R

   Jean-François Raffaëlli‎ (3 C, 1 P, 66 F)

Ö

Allan Österlind‎ (1 P, 24 F)

Après c'est peut-être plus clair. Cordialement.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 08:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
L'exemple que vous choisissez sur Category:Mary Cassatt est justement le contre-exemple qui justifie la nécessité de créer des sous-catégories. Il y a actuellement 252 photos dans cette catégorie, qu'on ne peut plus embrasser d'un seul coup d'œil, puisqu'une page de catégorie est limitée à 200. Pour juguler cette profusion, des contributeurs ont créé des sous-catégories par technique (pastel, peinture...), par thème (enfants...), par lieu (musée d'Honolulu), qui permettent de retrouver plus aisément une œuvre parmi l'ensemble. Je vous l'accorde, les 83 fichiers d'œuvre de Category:Malo-Renault restent encore suffisamment "peu nombreux" pour demeurer tous visibles en même temps. Mais je suppose que vous allez, à juste raison, continuer à en importer de nouveaux pour enrichir les collections communes de Commons. Ce qui conduira fatalement à un embonpoint trop prononcé de la catégorie. Vous indiquez qu'il serait possible de regarder directement les racines estampe, pastel... pour retrouver une œuvre de l'artiste. C'est vrai. Mais, les artistes sont si nombreux à avoir utiliser individuellement ces techniques qu'une catégorisation minimale pastel par exemple sera là-aussi trop fournie pour y retrouver quoi que ce soit. Je vais donc créer des sous-catégories par "art" qui permettront de catégoriser en une seule catégorie l'artiste et sa technique. En espérant que cette catégorisation vous siéra davantage. Cordialement, --Fab5669 (talk) 08:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC


Plan de la structure des sous-catégories, affiché au niveau de la catégorie principale[edit]

Il me semble qu'il manque un certain nombre de fichiers?

La catégorisation des fichiers (en catégories et sous catégories...) a certains avantages mais il manque d'une vue d'ensemble, une sorte de plan des sous-catégories avec le nombre de fichiers et le total rapportée à la catégorie racine. Ou bien on ne fait pas de catégorie (par exemple quand il y a moins de cent fichiers)?
Bon cela doit sembler confus? Bonne journée.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 05:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Pour avoir accès aux fichiers et sous-catégories, il faut cliquer sur le triangle bleu précédant celle-ci. Par exemple pour la Category:Malo-Renault, cela donne :
  • Malo-Renault‎ (1 C, 1 P, 2 F)
    • Works by [Œuvres de] Émile Malo-Renault‎ (2 C, 10 F)
      • Drawings by [Dessins de] Émile Malo-Renault‎ (1 C, 7 F)
        • Pastel drawings by [Dessins au pastel de] Émile Malo-Renault‎ (26 F)
      • Engravings by [Gravures de] Émile Malo-Renault‎ (1 C, 18 F)
        • Etchings by [Eaux-fortes de] Émile Malo-Renault‎ (1 C, 15 F)
          • La Petite chatte‎ (7 F)
Soit un total de 83 fichiers (en comptant d'éventuels doublons) comme œuvres de Malo-Renault. Pour plus d'informations sur les catégorisations, voir la page dédiée. Cordialement, --Fab5669 (talk) 05:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
::
Vers un compromis ?[edit]

@Fab5669:

Merci d'abord pour vos explications bien utile pour moi.

J'admets globalement la structure, j'y ajoute si vous le voulez bien un échantillon d'une quarantaine de fichiers au niveau visible <<Catégorie Malo-Renault>>
Cela donne:

  • Malo-Renault‎ (1 C, 1 P, 40 F)
    • Works by [Œuvres de] Émile Malo-Renault‎ (2 C, 10 F)
      • Drawings by [Dessins de] Émile Malo-Renault‎ (1 C, 7 F)
        • Pastel drawings by [Dessins au pastel de] Émile Malo-Renault‎ (26 F)
      • Engravings by [Gravures de] Émile Malo-Renault‎ (1 C, 18 F)
        • Etchings by [Eaux-fortes de] Émile Malo-Renault‎ (1 C, 15 F)
          • La Petite chatte‎ (7 F)

j'ai fait l'essai cela présente vraiment mieux. Cordialement--François Malo-Renault (talk) 15:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Exemple.
Bonjour @François Malo-Renault:
Je crois comprendre que la visibilité de vos importations vous... importe beaucoup justement. Dans l'exemple ci-contre, les catégories sont les suivantes : Category:Etchings by Émile Malo-Renault, Category:Traditional costumes of Bretagne in art, Category:Unidentified locations in Bretagne, Category:1910s etchings, Category:Bretagne in the 1910s, Category:Malo-Renault. Le problème de rajouter la dernière catégorie est que l'on a affaire à un cas de surcatégorisation (voir COM:SURCAT). Comme l'image est déjà contenue dans la Category:Etchings by Émile Malo-Renault, elle est de fait, sans qu'il soit besoin de le rajouter, dans la Category:Malo-Renault. Ainsi, cette Category:Etchings by Émile Malo-Renault, permet d'éviter d'y inscrire toutes les catégories implicites : pas besoin de recatégoriser avec la Category:Malo-Renault ou la Category:Etchings. Ce pourquoi j'ai créé cette catégorie. En effet, telle qu'elle étaitconstruite, la catégorisation permettait déjà d'identifier l'artiste, le sujet de l'œuvre, sa technique, sa période de création, son lieu de création (bien qu'il soit non-identifié, j'ai fait au mieux avec les éléments disponibles) ; la dernière catégorie n'apporte ainsi aucune information supplémentaire.
Vous montrez ensuite un échantillon de 40 images sur la catégorie-mère. On pourrait vous reprocher le choix de celles-ci : pourquoi celles-là ? Effectivement, je vous rejoins, sans sous-catégories, cette question ne se pose pas... Mais la recherche pourra ensuite poser problème parmi toutes ces images. Notez que la sous-catégorisation que j'ai effectuée aurait pu aussi se faire par date, plutôt que par technique artistique (par exemple, Category:1910s works by Malo-Renault). La création de catégories permettant d'infinies variations.
Je ne sais si vous l'avez parcourue, mais si ce n'est le cas, je vous invite à lire la page Commons:Catégories qui explique les bonnes pratiques en matière de catégorisation.
Bonne soirée, --Fab5669 (talk) 17:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maintien de la catégorie mère <<Malo-Renault>> avec une sélection d'estampes et pastels + la caractérisation par techniques[edit]

Bonjour @Fab5669 and Daehan:

Tout est dans le titre, maintenant de la catégorie <<Malo-Renault>> ...Si vous êtes d'accord vous pouvez retirer les bannières. La catégorisation par techniques se complique un peu avec : Affiches, cartons d'invitation, livres illustrés, textes sur et par Malo-Renault...

Par ailleurs Category:Traditional costumes of Bretagne in art, Category:Unidentified locations in Bretagne etc... vous fait comme vous le souhaitez...

Cordialement, bonne journée.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 06:54, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,
Je reste toujours en désaccord avec votre proposition. Pour lever ce désaccord, j'ai demandé un arbitrage sur le Bistro francophone, que je vous invite à visiter pour faire valoir votre point de vue. Cordialement, --Fab5669 (talk) 17:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Je suis en désaccord aussi : à partir du moment où un fichier est dans la catégorie "Pastel de MR", il n'y a pas à le présenter une seconde fois dans la racine. --Pa2chant. (talk) 13:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Catégorie: Graveur en couleur (de Wikipédia)[edit]

Bonjour @Fab5669 and Daehan: ,
La catégorie:Graveur en couleur: Graveur pratiquant la taille-douce ou la taille d'épargne avec impression en couleur par usage de matrices avec des encres de couleurs différentes, ou par encrage polychrome de la même matrice.<br>

La catégorie « Graveur en couleur >> contient les 18 pages suivantes...
Média dans la catégorie « Graveur en couleur » contient le seul fichier suivant:

   DEZAUNAY Emile Jeune fille et enfant de Rosporden.JPG
   526 × 400 ; 63 Kio

Catégorie :Graveur par technique

Pouvez vous, s'il vous plait, m'indiquer comment faire pour mettre un ou deux "fichier image" par artiste dans <Média dans la catégorie Graveur en couleur>
Merci d'avance.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 11:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour François Malo-Renault,
Je regrette, mais j'ai du mal à comprendre exactement où est le problème, ce que vous voulez dire par <Média dans la catégorie Graveur en couleur>, et ce qui vous empêche de simplement ajouter la catégorie au fichier, une fois importé.
Cordialement, --Daehan (talk) 15:11, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour@Daehan:
Ce serait plus clair si je pouvait mettre une copie d'écran, mais ce n'est pas possible donc je fait une redirection:
  1. REDIRECT [[1]] (ou https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Graveur_en_couleur)
Cordialement,--François Malo-Renault (talk) 15:32, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
D'accord, je comprends mieux.
Par contre, ne vous embêtez pas : vous confondez Wikipédia et Commons : ces catégories ne doivent s'appliquer sauf exception qu'à des articles, de plus la catégorie correspond à un artiste, et vous, vous y mettez une oeuvre.
Pourquoi avoir téléchargé ces fichiers sur Wikipédia en français et non sur Commons, s'ils sont dans le domaine public ?
Cordialement, --Daehan (talk) 15:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Le brûleur de goemon.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:Jeune fille et enfant de Rosporden.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le brûleur de goemon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 17:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Diplome Ecole du Louvre JMR.pdf[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:34, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:Les Costumes de fête, GEO-FOURRIER Georges (1898-1966).jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Les Costumes de fête, GEO-FOURRIER Georges (1898-1966).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)::[reply]

Bonjour,
On trouve la reproduction de cette gravure sur bois, estampe en couleur, de Géo-Fourrier: Dans le livre: La Gravure sur Bois en Bretagne 1850-2000 de Philippe le Stum , P 83, ed: Coop -Breizt)
Sur le site du Musées Départemental Breton de Quimper: http://musee-breton.finistere.fr/fr/search-notice/detail/7agw77odc6z6zu40taim5gceg184qqluv60awiru9icvek81nk
Et de nombreuse fois sur le net:
http://fremode.com/costumes-bretons-par-les-peintres.html
https://geo-fourrier.skyrock.com/
http://www.artnet.fr/artistes/georges-marius-geo-fourrier/
https://www.facebook.com/GeorgesGeoFourrier/photos/a.147826495413861.1073741826.147824885414022/551460918383748/?type=3
http://galerie-b.biz/galerie/Artistes/GeorgesG%C3%A9oFourrier/tabid/73/language/fr-FR/galerie-b.biz/galerie/tabid/74/language/fr-FR/default.aspx
http://galerie-b.biz/galerie/DesktopModules/Gallery/PictureGallery/tabid/60/oeuvre/111/Default.aspx
Cordialement.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 05:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Plaquette Roi de Madagascar par Jean Malo-Renault.pdf[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Plaquette Roi de Madagascar par Jean Malo-Renault.pdf

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Plaquette Roi de Madagascar par Jean Malo-Renault.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I received your email. Yann, perhaps you can assist this user in French with why he needs a license? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:54, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Étant donné que Jean Malo-Renault n'est pas mort depuis plus de 70 ans, ses oeuvres ne sont pas automatiquement dans le domaine public. Pourriez-vous confirmer par courriel que vous publiez ces documents dans le domaine public, ou sous une licence libre ? Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour les instructions. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:M Barrès, Jardin de Bérénice. décor-couv par Nori MR.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:M Barrès, Jardin de Bérénice. décor-couv par Nori MR.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 14:19, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:M Barrès, Jardin de Bérénice. décor-couv par Nori MR.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 15:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour@Jcb, Daehan, and Fab5669:
J'ai numérisé moi-même la couverture de ce livre (scan canon TS5055), Je viens de placer CC-BY-SA et de retirer l'auteur Maurice Barrès qui n'apparait pas en fait,  faut-il aussi retirer le titre du livre?
, il faudrait revoir le nom du fichier?

Cordialement.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 15:40, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Roman Futile, F Bernouard décor Nori MR.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Roman Futile, F Bernouard décor Nori MR.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 21:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Salomé,Osc Wilde décor-couv, par Nori MR.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Salomé,Osc Wilde décor-couv, par Nori MR.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 21:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Roman Futile, F Bernouard décor Nori MR.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Roman Futile, F Bernouard décor Nori MR.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 04:24, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup,

Ce n'est pas grave, il va falloir attendre 29 janvier 2024.
Bonne journée
Cordialement.
--François Malo-Renault (talk) 05:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Roman Futile, F Bernouard décor Nori MR.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Roman Futile, F Bernouard décor Nori MR.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 23:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Ethel Spowers -church-of-england-grammar-school.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ethel Spowers -church-of-england-grammar-school.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 17:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann,

J'ai trouver le portrait d'Ethel Spowers sur le site internet de Pinterset. J'ai ajouté dans la description la ligne author= Enregistrée par Patrick B sur https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/524739794066213190/
il serait utile de pouvoir laisser ce portrait au moins pour la page Ethel Spowers, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethel_Spowers. Merci.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 05:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Géo Fourrier, Bretonne, carte postale.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Géo Fourrier, Bretonne, carte postale.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 00:45, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gravure en Manière Noire "Averse".jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gravure en Manière Noire "Averse".jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 16:12, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfred Caravanniez (en 1900) et son épouse et deux de ses filles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.249.125.53 19:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Il n'y avait dans l'infobox de la page Alfred Caravanniez ni photo ni portrait de ce sculpteur, donc il serait bien utile de conserver ce fichier en attendant mieux . On connait la source: http://saint-nazaire.hautetfort.com/archive/2018/08/13/alfred-caravanniez-6072244.htmlet. Je pense c'est plutôt positif pour ce site. Par ailleurs les règles de copyright US (l’hébergeur de fr.wikipédia) sont un peu trop 'orientée laxiste' pour les US restrictive pour UE?.

Cordialement.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 03:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Document de la Bibliothèque nationale de France (1995) au sujet de Nori Malo-Renault.pdf

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Document de la Bibliothèque nationale de France (1995) au sujet de Nori Malo-Renault.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:32, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Je ne sais vraiment pas quelle licence choisir. C'est un extrait d'une correspondance du 6 mars 1995 de avec le Département des Estampes et de la Photographie de la Bibliothèque nationale de France, au sujet des ouvres de Nori Malo-Renault (1870-1953). Ce PDF est seulement du texte, il n'y pas de photo reproduisant des œuvres de Nori Malo-Renault. Ce serait regrettable de supprimer se PDF qui ne pourra pas être utilisé de toute façon avant 2023.
Cordialement. --François Malo-Renault (talk) 15:43, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann, Dyolf77: would either of you you be so kind as to respond? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:10, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour @Yann and Dyolf77: Pouvez-vous donner votre réponse, s'il vous plait ? --François Malo-Renault (talk) 05:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a serious violation of Commons rules to remove {{Delete}} tags from Commons pages. If you think that the nomination is incorrect, you must comment at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Malo-Renault. If you take such action again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Bretagne Touristique (1927), couverture de la revue n°69.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Daehan, Fab5669, and Jameslwoodward:

Je ne suis pas d'accord , ce fichier représentant la couverture de la publication La Bretagne Touristique (1927) doit être conservé. Il fait parti de la page Wikipédia: La Bretagne Touristique et c'est la seule illustration de cette page. Cordialement,--François Malo-Renault (talk) 16:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are many things which we would like to preserve, but we cannot keep because they are copyrighted. It is up to you to prove that this illustration is no longer under copyright because the author died before 1949. Also, please make your comments on Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Bretagne Touristique (1927), couverture de la revue n°69.jpg so that all of the interested editors will see them. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La version que vous voulez annuler provient de la Bibliothèque nationale de France et a été classée : DOMAINE PUBLIC.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 14:52, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Daehan and Huster:
Je pense qu'il a soit une incompréhension soit un abus de pouvoir de la part de Jim : car ces documents sont déjà classés dans le domaine public en France, en particulier ce lui paru dans la Gerbe II de 1927 , Cf la Bibliothèque nationale de France
Cordialement--François Malo-Renault (talk) 09:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour François Malo-Renault,
Jim applique un principe de précaution : on n'est pas sûr que l'auteur soit mort avant 1949, donc pour l'instant, on n'est pas sûr que l'image soit dans le domaine public AUX ETATS-UNIS. Car Wikimedia Commons est hébergé aux Etats-Unis, et avant d'appliquer le droit à l'image local, il faut s'assurer qu'il n'enfreint aucun droit à l'image là-bas.
De manière générale, il faut discuter avant de supprimer des modifications ou des licences en passant en force, c'est ce qui vous a valu ce blocage d'une semaine.
Cordialement, --Daehan (talk) 10:53, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merci Daehan
Je ne vais quand même pas fournir une pièce d'état civil, je suis dans mon bon droit et si c' est des USA qui valide l’authenticité des documents français alors c'est cher payé leur hébergement.
Mais j' ai l'impression que l'on ne pas argumenter avec les Américains, il serait peut-être intéressant que les européens hébergent eux même leur propre 'patrimoine'?
('citation : raison pour la demande de suppression Malo-Renault died in 1938; therefore his work was under copyright in France until 2008 and does not meet the requirements under URAA to be free of copyright in the USA until at least 2020. Note that I have selected only those works with unknown dates or those after 1924. Works from 1923 and earlier are PD-USA.) ' je comprends rien, c'est pas 70 ans?
--François Malo-Renault (talk) 11:51, 30 November 2019 (UTC),[reply]
Sans entrer dans des considérations autres que pratiques, il y a Gallica, pour ce qui est de l'hébergement des images sous licence libre en France. Ce qui est sur Gallica est accepté sur Commons. Peut-être que vous pourriez faire don de vos archives à la Bibliothèque nationale de France et qu'elle les numérise. Je pense qu'elles prêteront la même attention à ce qui est ou n'est pas sous licence libre. Il est possible de contacter Wikimédia France pour vous aider. --Daehan (talk) 11:55, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pour ce qui est des considérations pratiques: c'est déjà sur Gallica le document contesté, il suffit de lire entièrement--François Malo-Renault (talk) 13:51, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Non:La version que vous voulez annuler provient de la Bibliothèque nationale de France et a été classée : DOMAINE PUBLIC[edit]

File:Article sur Malo Renault par Emile Dacier, la Gerbe II, (1927).pdf[edit]

@Daehan, Huster, and Magog the Ogre: Rappel message sur le fichier: Incorrectly listed as public domain on gallica. Will not be public domain in France or the US until 2023. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non: La version que vous voulez annuler provient de la Bibliothèque nationale de France et a été classée : DOMAINE PUBLIC.--François Malo-Renault (d) 14:52, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Voici la notice format public:https://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb334037511.public
Voici la notice au format unimarc:https://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb334037511.unimarc
Voici l'article dans Gallica : https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k316531f/f23.item
--François Malo-Renault (talk) 07:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is that you have uploaded it as CC0 and that is simply wrong. The license applied needs to match the reality of its publication and the author who wrote the work. If it is published in 1927, it would usually be 2023 to be out of copyright, which is at the end of the year of publication + 95 years, AND 70 years post the death of the author. That another site has got it wrong is irrelevant to the above statements and may just mean that you should not trust them absolutely.. Once your block has expired, I really encourage you to get to Com:Village pump/Copyright to ask your questions and to learn. It is really important that you learn so you don't get into trouble again.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Raison pour ne pas détruire ces 2 fichiers:
1) L'article d'Emile Dacier (1876-1952) sur Malo-Renault (1870-1938) est en fait la page où l'on voit une reproduction couleur d'une œuvre de Malo-Renault ( 1870-1938), le titre de ce fichier est peut-être mal choisi c'est pour cela que je voulais le renommer mais cela m'a été interdit. Il faut remarquer que cet article est déjà situé dans le domaine public par la Bibliothèque nationale de France et numérisé et mis en ligne par son département Gallica.
2) Pour la photo de la couverture du mensuel << La Bretagne Touristique>> de 1927 sert à illustrer page Wikipédia du même nom (et c'est la seule illustration de cette page), c'est évidemment dans le domaine public.
Ps: Contrefer : Commons:Demandes de restauration--François Malo-Renault (talk) 06:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Faute de frappe dans Contrefer lire Conférer, merci --François Malo-Renault (talk) 06:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pourquoi Le bandeau demande de destruction est toujours là ?[edit]

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests Une page de Wikimedia Commons, la médiathèque libre. < Commons:Undeletion requests Sauter à la navigation Sauter à la recherche

Files uploaded by François Malo-Renault

Please restore the following pages: 47 Files

Reason: Raison: Ces 2 fichiers sont dans le domaine public. L'article d’Émile Dacier (1876-1952) sur Malo-Renault (1870-1938) est en fait la page où l'on voit une reproduction couleur de Malo-Renault ( 1870-1938), le titre de ce fichier est peut-être mal choisi c'est pour cela que je voulais le renommer mais cela m'a été interdit. Il faut remarquer que cet article est déjà situé dans le domaine public par la Bibliothèque nationale de France et numérisé et mis en ligne par son département Gallica. Pour la photo de la couverture du mensuel << La Bretagne Touristique>> de 1927 sert à illustrer page Wikipédia du même nom (et c'est la seule illustration de cette page), c'est évidemment dans le Domaine Public. François Malo-Renault (d) 05:59, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

  Symbol oppose vote.svg Contre The files were deleted due to various rationales (scope issues, missing or incorrect source/author information, mission OTRS permission or clear copyvio). Maybe some of them are PD (but evidence about this is needed), maybe copyright of some of them is owned by the uploader (but evidence for this should be send via email). Maybe some works by anonymous photographers are more than 120 years old (so 

Public domain The copyright situation of this work is theoretically uncertain, because in the country of origin copyright lasts 70 years after the death of the author, and the date of the author's death is unknown. However, the date of creation of the work was over 120 years ago, and it is thus a reasonable assumption that the copyright has expired (see here for the community discussion). Do not use this template if the date of death of the author is known.

Cette œuvre est également dans le domaine public dans tous les pays pour lesquels le copyright a une durée de vie de 70 ans ou moins après la mort de l'auteur.

Dialog-warning.svg Vous devez aussi inclure un modèle indiquant pourquoi cette œuvre est dans le domaine public aux États-Unis. Veuillez aussi noter que certains pays ont des droits d'auteurs qui courent plus de 70 ans après la mort : 75 ans pour les Samoa et le Guatemala, 80 ans pour la Colombie, 95 ans pour la Jamaïque, 100 ans pour le Mexique. Cette image peut ne pas être dans le domaine public dans ces pays, qui d'ailleurs n'appliquent pas la règle du terme le plus court. Le droit d'auteur expire en Côte d'Ivoire 99 ans après la mort et après 75 ans au Honduras, mais ces pays appliquent la règle du terme le plus court. Ce fichier a été identifié comme étant exempt de restrictions connues liées au droit d’auteur, y compris tous les droits connexes et voisins.

) but evidence for creation date is needed. Not possible to handle as a single set. Ankry (d) 08:56, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

  Symbol oppose vote.svg Contre Also, François Malo-Renault, when you do that, please note that you claimed Travail personnel, which says that you were the photographer, on an image made in 1900. That cannot possibly be correct. Making such claims makes it very hard for us to believe anything you say.
  Many of the works named above were created by people other than yourself who died after 1949. If you are the heir of the creator, you may grant a free license using OTRS, but they cannot be restored by any request here. If you are not the heir of the creator, then such works cannot be restored. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Cette demande de restauration de fichier est maintenant fermée. Merci de ne pas modifier cette archive. Undeletion request of File:Article sur Malo Renault par Emile Dacier, la Gerbe II, (1927).pdf, car fichier du domaine public

File:Article sur Malo Renault par Emile Dacier, la Gerbe II, (1927).pdf File:La Bretagne Touristique (1927), couverture de la revue n°69.jpg

      Raison: Ces 2 fichiers sont dans le domaine public. L'article d’Empile Dacier (1876-1952) sur Malo-Renault (1870-1938) est en fait la page où l'on voit une reproduction couleur d'une œuvre de Malo-Renault ( 1870-1938), le tire de ce fichier est peut-être mal choisi c'est pour cela que je voulais le renommer mais cela m'a été interdit. Il faut remarquer que cet article est déjà situé dans le domaine public par la Bibliothèque nationale de France et numérisé et mis en ligne par son département Gallica.
      Pour la photo de la couverture du mensuel << La Bretagne Touristique>> de 1927 sert à illustrer page Wikipédia du même nom (et c'est la seule illustration de cette page), c'est évidemment dans le Domaine Public

--François Malo-Renault (d) 06:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC).

Ps: Domaine public en France; https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k316531f/f23.item


   Pas fait Procedural close, files are not deleted. Thuresson (d) 08:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Catégories (++): (+)
--François Malo-Renault (talk) 06:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pourquoi Le bandeau demande de destruction est toujours là?[edit]

Un peu de franchise c'est oui ou c'est non?--François Malo-Renault (talk) 09:34, 14 December 2019 (UTC) Banana without copyright in the USA: yes or no?[reply]

  1. REDIRECT [[2]]

--François Malo-Renault (talk) 10:45, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Daehan: Alors que signifie le texte de cette banère posée depuis le 23 Novembre : {{delete|reason=Malo-Renault died in 1938; therefore his work was under copyright in France until 2008 and does not meet the requirements under URAA to be free of copyright in the USA until at least 2020. Note that I have selected only those works with unknown dates or those after 1924. Works from 1923 and earlier are PD-USA.|subpage=Files in Category:Malo-Renault|year=2019|month=November|day=23}} Merci pour votre compréhension mais il semble que certains admins de Wikmedia Commons ne respectent pas leurs propres règles??
Existe-t-il un autre moyen de conserver des images dans ( ou pour) Wikipédia.fr en dehors de Wikmedia Commons ? Cordialement, --François Malo-Renault (talk) 04:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 21:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove deletion requests[edit]

Bahasa Indonesia  বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

jdx Re: 09:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merci de ne pas faire de demande de suppression sur des œuvres dans le domaine public et dans des musées nationaux , dont le musée de Pont-Aven et le musée de Bretagne et la BnF.
Cordialement, Copie:@Daehan and Huster: .--François Malo-Renault (talk) 11:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, de quels fichiers s'agit-il ? Les trois de la section au-dessus n'ont pas de bandeau de suppression. --Daehan (talk) 11:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
il y a pas beaucoup de trace mais voila:
pour l' estampe <<La famille de Bigouden au Cochon>>. il avait aussi le pastel : << La Jeune fille et son chat >> (musée de Bretagne), un autre pastel (mais c'est un doublon, tant mieux) et une page :::d'article de la Bretagne Touristique (1927), d' Émile ' Acier.
sitation:
actudiff 8 avril 2020 à 13:05‎ François Malo-Renault discussion contributions‎ 1 971 octets -220‎ Dans le domaine public et dans des musées nationaux , dont le musée de Pont-Aven et le musée de Betagne: http://www.collections.musee-bretagne.fr/ark:/83011/FLMjo215308 et la BnF annuler
actudiff 7 avril 2020 à 12:19‎ Yann discussion contributions‎ 2 191 octets +18‎
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.


This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.

The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain".
This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details.

annulerremercier

actudiff 7 avril 2020 à 12:15‎ Yann discussion contributions‎ 2 173 octets +53‎ →‎Summary annulerremercier actudiff 3 avril 2020 à 10:55‎ Jdx discussion contributions‎ m 2 120 octets 0‎ Protected "File:Famille de Bigoudens au Cochon. eau.forte. Malo Renault. MdePA, MdeB.jpg": Counter-productive edit warring ([Edit=Allow only template editors and administrators] (expires 08:55, 3 June 2020 (UTC)) [Move=Allow only template editors and administrators] (expires 08:55, 3 June 2020 (UTC)) [Upload=Allow only template editors and administrators] (expires 08:55, 3 June 2020 (UTC))) annulerremercier actudiff 3 avril 2020 à 10:52‎ Jdx discussion contributions‎ m 2 120 octets +291‎ Reverted edits by François Malo-Renault (talk) to last revision by Explicit annulerremercier Balise : Révocation actudiff 3 avril 2020 à 06:45‎ François Malo-Renault discussion contributions‎ 1 829 octets -89‎ annuler actudiff 3 avril 2020 à 06:44‎ François Malo-Renault discussion contributions‎ 1 918 octets -202‎ Domaine public en France (décès de plus de 70 ans => cc-zero), annuler

Cordialement.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 12:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Demande de suppressions de fichiers reproduisant des œuvres 2D du domaine public, suivie quasi automatiquement de suppression.:[edit]

Archive du mois d’Avril 2020[edit]

Version actuelle datée du 13 avril 2020 à 15:24

Ce débat de suppression est clos. Merci de ne pas modifier cette archive. Vous pouvez lire la politique de suppression de documents ou poser une question au Bistro. Si les circonstances à propos de ce fichier ont changé de manière significative, vous pouvez proposer de nouveau sa suppression ou demander sa restauration. Files in Category:Malo-Renault

Malo-Renault died in 1938; therefore his work was under copyright in France until 2008 and does not meet the requirements under URAA to be free of copyright in the USA until at least 2020. Note that I have selected only those works with unknown dates or those after 1924. Works from 1923 and earlier are PD-USA.

   File:Reproduction dessin de Malo-Renault, La Bretagne Touristique, E Dacier 1927.jpg
   File:Famille de Bigoudens au Cochon. eau.forte. Malo Renault. MdePA, MdeB.jpg
   File:Jeune fille au Chat , Pastel EMR MdeB.jpg
   File:Marchande au panier d'osier, pastel, Malo Renault (1870-1938), Musée Bretagne.jpg

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

   Also note that the first item is an article written by Émile Dacier, who died in 1952. The article will be under copyright in France until 1/1/2023.
       Hello Jameslwoodward,as far as I understand, a 2D work should be in the Public Domain 70 years after its author's death, in France. Although Wikimedia Commons servers are in the USA, the French licensing should prevail, doesn't it? Regards, --Daehan (d) 09:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
           No. Because Commons computer servers are in the United States, all images on Commons must be PD or freely licensed in both the country of origin and the United States. See Commons:Licensing where it says:
               Wikimedia Commons only accepts media
                   that are explicitly freely licensed, or
                   that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work.
           .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (d) 11:46, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

A près avoir demandé la restauration de deux fichies dans le domaine public, j'ai obtenu la restauration de: File:Famille de Bigoudens au Cochon. eau.forte. Malo Renault. MdePA, MdeB.jpg, et File:Jeune fille au Chat , Pastel EMR MdeB.jpg
Merci, mais cela consomme beaucoup d’énergie..... --François Malo-Renault (talk) 06:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 08:24, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 22:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inventaire de Chalcographie du louvre - 8 fiches Nori Malo-Renault.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chassipress (talk) 20:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:René Marcille doc identifiant Roglo.pdf

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:René Marcille doc identifiant Roglo.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback![edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carton invitation 1999 musée des beaux-arts, Quimper, repro estampe Nori.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:CB00:A05:D100:350B:FABC:E0A1:3BB5 17:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:St-Malo, plage de léventail, carte Michelin.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyright infringement / piracy
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Don-vip.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Carte Mappy, Rennes, rue René Marcille.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carte Mappy, Rennes, rue René Marcille.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Comment répondre correctement à 202 demandes de suppression ?!
Salutation François Malo-Renault (talk) 04:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove deletion requests[edit]

Bahasa Indonesia  বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked soon[edit]

বাংলা  čeština  словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  magyar  日本語  македонски  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk  português  русский  slovenščina  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


float
   This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Commons.

Your deletions seem to be revenge against EugeneZelenko. Do not do that again. Thanks, --Yann (talk) 11:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, il faut voir la liste ci-dessus des demandes de suppression de @ EugeneZelenko
Cordialement,-François Malo-Renault François Malo-Renault (talk) 12:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't know French :-( Please read w:fr:Domaine public (propriété intellectuelle) and Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country(es) to understand what is problem with your uploads and how it should be fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Désolé je ne comprends pas bien l'anglais et le motif ces demandes massives de suppression; Je pense que c'est déloyale. François Malo-Renault (talk) 14:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bonjour, merci pour votre analyse, je ne comprends pas cette demande massive de suppression de la part de EugeneZelenko.
  • @François Malo-Renault: Vous êtes responsable des fichiers que vous importez. C'est à vous de répondre à cette demande, notamment en corrigeant et/ou complétant les informations manquantes ou erronées. Si vous ne le faites pas, ils seront supprimés. Comme Eugene l'explique dans la demande de suppression, ces fichiers n'ont pas la bonne licence, et les informations concernant l'auteur, la date et/ou la source sont fausses ou incomplètes. Vous ne pouvez pas utiliser une licence Creative Commons (CC-BY-SA) si vous n'êtes pas l'auteur des documents. Pour chacun d'eux, il faut indiquer la source d'où vous avez copié ces fichiers, la date de création et l'auteur des œuvres reproduites. N'hésitez pas à me demander si vous avez des questions. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour votre aide--François Malo-Renault (talk) 12:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pour en savoir plus...[edit]

Les commentaires de diff étant le pire lieu pour échanger, je vous réponds ici. Le monument est décrit sur Wikipédia en polonais : pl:Pomnik Czynu Zbrojnego Polonii Amerykańskiej. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:La Lettre Ornée au Moyen Age (suite ) JMR 1934.pdf

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:La Lettre Ornée au Moyen Age (suite ) JMR 1934.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Henri Marie Petiet (1894-1980).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Henri Marie Petiet (1894-1980).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voir la page de discutionːhttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Henri_Marie_Petiet_(1894-1980).jpg François Malo-Renault (talk) 03:37, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ne pas effacer automatiquement, s'il vous plait.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Henri_Marie_Petiet_(1894-1980).jpg François Malo-Renault (talk) 03:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, corrigé--François Malo-Renault (talk) 14:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Henri Marie Petiet (1894-1980).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Henri Marie Petiet (1894-1980).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yann (talk) 13:41, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, J'ai corrigé la licence et fermé la demande de suppression pour certains des fichiers de cette liste (marqués OK). Il en reste encore. Il faudrait envoyer une autorisation générale pour tous les documents dont l'auteur est Jean Malo-Renault (1900–1988), car ils ne sont pas dans le domaine public. Voyez COM:VRT/fr pour la procédure. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup.
Et les documents de Jean Malo-Renault, je vais voir si ce n'est pas trop compliquer car en générale cela a été déjà publié à son époque...
Pour Nori Malo-Renault, née Honorine Tian (1871-1953) son œuvre va passer bientot dans le domaine public donc il faut attendre encore un peu.
Cordialement
François Malo-Renault François Malo-Renault (talk) 14:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, Ce message est inapproprié. Elle a très gentiment complété les informations que vous auriez dû fournir et fermer la demande de suppression en gardant la plupart des fichiers. Vous devriez répondre aux demandes plutôt que d'attaquer les autres utilisateurs. Yann (talk) 07:49, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Yann, @Ellwa
Je ne comprends pas le jargon DR, Pd ... surtout avec un contexte de mise en cause toute azimut plutôt brutal. François Malo-Renault François Malo-Renault (talk) 10:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Cher Monsieur Malo-Renault, si vous ne comprenez pas, vous pouvez bien sûr toujours demander conseil. Tout ce qui concerne le droit d'auteur est également compliqué. Sur Commons, toutes les images doivent être libres de droit. Les images et œuvres, comme ses articles écrits, d'Émile Malo-Renault sont libres (dans le domaine public = PD), car il est décédé il y a plus de 70 ans. Les illustrations dans un tel article par d'autres ne sont parfois pas gratuites. L'œuvre de Jean Malo-Renault n'est pas non plus libre de droit. Si j'ai bien compris, il est décédé en 1988. Pour publier son œuvre, il faut l'autorisation des héritiers. C'est peut-être vous, bien sûr, je ne sais pas. Pour donner l'autorisation, vous pouvez suivre la procédure décrite sur cette page : COM:VRT. Cela aussi est complexe, mais veuillez prendre le temps de le lire et n'hésitez pas à poser vos questions. S'il n'y a pas d'autorisation, les fichiers doivent être supprimés de Commons, je l'ai fait avec Yann, entre autres. Si l'autorisation a été reçue des héritiers, les fichiers peuvent être restaurés. J'espère sincèrement que c'est clair. Cordialement, Ellywa (talk) 11:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Excuses pour le mauvais français, ceci est traduit de ma langue maternelle, le néerlandais, avec Google translate; je comprends assez bien le français mais écrire en français est très difficile pour moi)
Merci beaucoup @Ellwa pour toutes vos explications en français. Mais que veut dire DR? ( j’utilise aussi la traduction Google).
Serait-il possible s'il vous plait, d'avoir un résumé (les noms) de tous les fichiers supprimés ou à supprimer depuis septembre me concernant. Copie@Yann
Merci d'avance.
Cordialement François Malo-Renault (talk) 12:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DR veut dire "deletion request" = demande de suppression. Yann (talk) 19:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Vous pouvez voir les fichiers qui sont supprimés sous forme de "liens de couleur rouge" sur cette page : Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by François Malo-Renault. Ellywa (talk) 21:51, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merci. François Malo-Renault (talk) 09:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion / restoration of files[edit]

Please see Commons:Demandes de restauration. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 08:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Maud Hunt SQUIRE 1935.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Maud Hunt SQUIRE 1935.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Déco-couv émaux Nori MR. Petites Légendes de E. Verhaeren.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Déco-couv émaux Nori MR. Petites Légendes de E. Verhaeren.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Le Chateau des Merveilles 1893, décor-couv lamé par Nori MR.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Le Chateau des Merveilles 1893, décor-couv lamé par Nori MR.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 10:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aussi File:Le Chateau des Merveilles 1893, décor-couv lamé par Nori MR.jpg Abzeronow (talk) 17:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Nori MR eau forte coul.la Dinette.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nori MR eau forte coul.la Dinette.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nori MR eau forte coul.la Dinette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Saint-Malo vue du ciel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Lefringant (talk) 14:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Statue de Robert Surcouf, St Malo source O.F.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Lefringant (talk) 14:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Minerve. Broderie de Nori MR,.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Minerve. Broderie de Nori MR,.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:05, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:The walled city of Saint-Malo in France.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Lefringant (talk) 08:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Etes vous l'auteur de ce cliché? Disposez vous des droits dessus? Avez vous donc la possibilité de la charger sous licence libre? Comme la photo vient d'un autre site j'ai de bonne raisons de penser que cette image peut beneficier d'une suppresssion rapide. Merci de ne plus enlever le bandeau sous peine des consequences qui pourraient s'ensuivre.Lefringant (talk) 11:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

En toute logique le fichier a été supprimé. Merci à l'avenir de ne pas charger des fichiers que vous trouvez sur internet sans en posséder les droits.--Lefringant (talk) 08:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]