User talk:FlocciNivis/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210930 Falco tinnunculus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20211010 Saarburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Would probably have cropped image for more focus on town\buildings but good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180507 Rathaus Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220730 Moosach Munich 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20211010 Weingut Würtzberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 17:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220327 Todesmarschmahnmal Obermenzing 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210129 Paul-Marien-Straße 10 Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210109 Westspange Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 12:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220623 Gackelsberg und Hirschberg suedllich von Limbach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180107 Haltepunkt St. Ottilien 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210609 Garage Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210711 Bahnhof Bous 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 12:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220811 Beisheim-Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220812 Jannowitzcenter 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 11:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220730 Moosach Munich 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction and too much noise, I believe --Poco a poco 15:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)  Done I performed those things + moire removal --FlocciNivis 21:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20211010 Saarburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can more character be revealed in the shaded portion of the image? --Scotch Mist 18:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)  Done I brighted the dark area a bit and did some other improvements --FlocciNivis 22:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 13:50, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201107 St. Petrus Canisius Saarlouis 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 13:50, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190217Spaziergang Ludwigspark 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190324 Plateau du Saint-Esprit 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200408 Folsterhöhe Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200408 Industriegebiet Süd Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201010 Wayside Shrine am Grain Deidesheim 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201031 Püttlinger Schlösschen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201031 Püttlinger Straße Völklingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20191221Halberg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 18:24, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210402 Verwaltungsgebäude Schlachthof Sulzbach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Cemetery walls (seit 2014) --- Churchyard walls (seit 2021)

@FlocciNivis: Du hast 2021 die Category:Churchyard walls erstellt. Danke hierfür.

Ich wollte bezüglich der Unterscheidung zur Category:Cemetery walls fragen, die seit 2014 besteht, denn ich hatte Bilder entdeckt, die in beiden Kategorien drinstehen und die Wikidata Bezeichnungen könnten eventuell passender Formuliert werden.

Mit Cemetery walls ist Friedhofsmauer gemeint. Mit Churchyard walls sind Kirchhofmauern gemeint?

Über Wikidata ist Churchyard walls als "Mauer um einen Friedhof / Kirchhof" gekennzeichnet. Aber sollte es sich nicht nur auf Kirchhöfe beziehen, die sicherlich auch Friedhöfe direkt an Kirchen beinhalten können, jedoch nicht müssen (da die Kirchhofmauern teilweise nur Wehrkirchenfunktionen dienten; = Defensive walls).

Dementsprechend wäre vielleicht die Formulierung "Mauer um einen Kirchhof" besser?

Gruß -- Triple C 85 ^{| User talk |} 07:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Hallo @Triplec85,

Ich hatte mich damals bei dem Erstellen der Kategorie vor allem an Wikidata orientiert, bin aber auch schnell darauf gestoßen, dass Churchyard walls auch oft Cemetery walls sind. FlocciNivis (talk) 10:38, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Ich stimme deinem Vorschlag mit der Umformulierung auch zu. Aber ich denke es wäre gut, wenn wir noch eine Meinung von jemanden bekommen würden, der sich mit Kunstgeschichte oder Architektur auskennt. Vielleicht haben die Begriffe dort ja eine exakte Bedeutung. Auf Denkmalseiten scheinen sie jedenfalls eher synonym verwendet werden. eventuell könnte es ja sogar sein, dass Kirchhofmauern eine Subklasse von Fiedhofsmauer sind.

@AnRo0002 Kannst du hier vielleicht helfen? FlocciNivis (talk) 10:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Okay.

@XRay, L. Beck, Granpar, Im Fokus, and Atamari: Zur Kenntnisnahme (weitere Meinungen). Meiner Meinung nach ist es so:

1. wenn ein Friedhof z.B. außerhalb des Ortes liegt, bzw. ein Friedhof ohne Kirche, jedoch mit Mauer drum herum, dann ist es eine reine "Cemetery wall".
2. Besteht um eine Kirchengebäude ein Hof mit Mauer, dann ist es ein "Churchyard" (Kirchhof) bzw. Category:Churchyard walls (Kirchhofmauer).
3. Wenn in einem Kirchhof gleichzeitig Gräber sind, also ein Friedhof um die Kirche herum, direkt angrenzend, innerhalb einer Kirchhofmauer, dann ist es gleichzeitig eine Churchyard wall + Cemetery wall (beides!)

Was meint ihr?

Gruß -- Triple C 85 ^{| User talk |} 10:50, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Hallo zusammen,

grundsätzlich waren die Kirchhofmauern immer zugleich Friedhofsmauern. Die Toten wurden schon in der Antike in oder neben Sakralbauten beigesetzt. Erst im 19.Jh. entstanden Friedhöfe, so wie wir sie heute kennen. Nur in seltenen Fällen befindet sich heute noch der Friedhof direkt um die Kirche. Da würde ich einer doppel-Kategorisierung zustimmen (s.o.). Oft sind es noch Epitaphe, seltener einzelne Grabsteine, die an den früheren Friedhof um die Kirche erinnern. Besteht also noch eine Kirchhofmauer so war sie in der Regel zugleich Friedhofsmauer. Im übrigen würde ich die Mauern einer Kirchenburg nicht als Kirchhofmauern sondern als Wehrmauern bezeichnen (meist befand sich aber auch da der Friedhof innerhalb der Mauern). Gruß anro (talk) 11:59, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Hallo @AnRo0002, danke für deine Antwort.

Eine Rückfrage hätte ich noch. In Wikidata kann man ja sagen, dass ein Item eine Unterklasse eines anderen ist. Würdest du jetzt im Fall von einer Kirchhofmauer sagen, dass sie eine Unterklasse von einer Friedhofsmauer ist? Oder würdest du die beiden Begriffe komplett parallel lassen und wie oben genannt dann die Doppelnennungen machen (es geht ja auch in Wikidata, dass ein Item Instanz zweier Klassen ist), wenn die Mauer im Jetzt-Zustand als beides fungiert. In dem Fall wäre es dann imo noch sinnvoll beide Begriffe mit einem "different from" statement zu verbinden. Das wird z.B. benutzt um zwei ähnliche Begriffe oder Objekte, die oft verwechselt werden, zu kennzeichnen.

Und ich nehme mal an die Mauern einer Kirchburg wären dann auf jeden Fall Unterklassen von Kirchhofmauern und Wehrmauern zur selben Zeit? Also praktisch eine Kombination beider Begriffe. FlocciNivis (talk) 12:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Hallo @FlocciNivis,

Nein, wenn man nicht mehr sieht, dass es im Kirchhof je einen Friedhof gab, was höchstens durch eine archäologische Untersuchung festgestellt werden könnte, dann ist die Kirchhofmauer für mich keine Unterklasse der Friedhofsmauer. Ich kenne zwar kein Beispiel, aber möglicherweise gibt es auch Kirchhofmauern, die nie oder nicht mehr nachweisbar einen Friedhof enthielten. Und im Fall von Kirchenburgen, gibt es da überhaupt entsprechende Kategorien? Diese Mauern halte ich jedenfalls nicht für eine Unterklasse von Friedhofsmauern, da sie Grundverschieden sind: Die Kirchhofmauer ist oft mit einem Bocksprung überwindbar, die Kirchenburg ohne Belagerungsmaschinen nicht. Ihre mauern gehören für mich nur zu defensive walls. Gruß anro (talk) 12:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

@AnRo0002 Gut! Ich denke in einem Fall, dass eine Kirchhofmauer mal eine Friedhofsmauer war, aber nicht mehr ist, reicht es vielleicht auch aus, das in Wikidata mit einem "end date" qualifier einzutragen.

Was die Kirchburgen angeht würde ich argumentieren, dass wie in de:Kirchenburg erwähnt, eine Kirchenburg eine Befestigung um einen Kirchhof (englisch churchyard) ist und es sich deswegen auch um eine Art von churchyard wall handelt bei der Befestigung einer Kirchburg.

Auf Wikidata scheint es jedoch bisher so gehandhabt zu werden wie du es vorschlägst. Es gibt dort extra die Klasse Kirchhofbefestigung (wikidata:Q98141380), die Unterklasse von wall, church building und defensive wall ist (wobei das erste wall redudant ist imo). Diese Klasse wird auch schon von einigen Objekten instanziiert... So zum Beispiel wikidata:Q98583017 und wikidata:Q98743271.

Die Kategorien gibt es hier noch nicht, wie ich das sehe, aber etliche Kategorien für einzelne Kirchhofbefestigungen. Da könnten wir ja die passende Überkategorie erstellen und sie mit dem Wikidata Item verlinken. FlocciNivis (talk) 15:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Ich kenne auch noch grave yard als Friedhof um eine Kirche. --Granpar (talk) 12:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

@Granpar Danke dir für die Anmerkung. en:Cemetery und en:Graveyard (disambiguation) haben zu der Begriffsunterscheidung auch noch etwas input, wie ich gerade sehe. FlocciNivis (talk) 12:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Wie lässt sich das noch unterscheiden?

a) Friedhof mit Mauer, jedoch ohne Kirche nebenan, als "Cemetery" mit "Cemetery wall".

b) Wenn ein Friedhof um eine Kirche, jedoch keine Mauer hat, wohl nur ein "Graveyard".

c) Wenn ein Kirchhof mit Mauer jedoch keinen Friedhof hat, wohl nur ein "Churchyard" (mit "Churchyard wall")

d) Wenn ein Kirchhof mit Mauer und Gräbern/Friedhof innerhalb der Mauern besteht, dann ist es wohl ein "Churchyard" (mit "Churchyard wall") sowie gleichzeitig durch die Gräber ein "Gravecard" (mit "Cemetery wall")?

:-)

Gruß -- Triple C 85 ^{| User talk |} 12:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Guten Abend. Das klinbgt doch so sinnvoll. Ich kenne mich damit nicht aus, müsste dann aber wohl meine Bilder umkategorisieren. Halte es dann noch für sinnvoll, diese Info in die Kategorie zu schreiben, dass andere Nutzer die Unterscheidung auch nachvollziehen können. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Noch ein Gedanke: Friedhof mit Mauer kann auch bedeuten, dass es sich um einen muslemischen oder jüdischen Friedhof handeln kann. Also deswegen kann es sich nicht um ein Synonym zu "Churchyard wall" handeln. Mir sind auch Kirchen bekannt, deren Grundstück mit einer Mauer umfasst sind aber es nicht um Friedhöfe (bzw Kirchhöfe) handelt. --Atamari (talk) 13:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Guter Gedanke bzw. gute Einwände. Das spricht beides (verschiedenen Religionen, Kirchhöfe ohne Friedhof) dafür, "Churchyard walls" nicht als Unterkategorie von "Cemetery walls" zu führen. -- Triple C 85 ^{| User talk |} 14:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Ja, meine Schlussfolgerung aus der Diskussion ist auch, dass wir die beiden Begriffe getrennt halten sollten. Und dann Mauern, die beides sind, unter beiden Begriffen zu kategorisieren, wie z.B. Category:Friedhofsmauer (Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche Fröttmaning).

Ich denke, es wäre dann auch sinnvoll in beide Kategorien einen entsprechenden Hinweis einzubringen. FlocciNivis (talk) 16:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Ich habe derweil mal die bisher unsortierten Bilder der Category:Churchyard walls nach 4 Ländern und innerhalb Deutschlands nach 3 Bundesländern sortiert.

@FlocciNivis: Hinweise (de-Beschreibungen und einen Verweis auf die jeweils andere Category mit "cat see also") habe ich angebracht.

Daneben in zwei Wikidata Objekten beschrieben und jeweils die Aussage "verschieden von/nicht zu verwechseln mit" (--> mit dem jeweils anderen Datenobjekt) ergänzt.

Gruß -- Triple C 85 ^{| User talk |} 18:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

@Triplec85 Supi, danke dir :-) Ich habe jetzt mal die Kategorie Category:Churchyard fortifications erstellt und sie auch schon etwas befüllt. Ist aber noch in work-in-progress. Jetzt wo ich einige Beispiele für Kirchhofsbefestigungen selbst gesehen hab, muss ich @AnRo0002 hier zustimmen und sagen, dass es wohl weniger sinnvoll ist, diese als Unterkategorie von Kirchhofsmauern zu sehen, sondern auch eher als etwas Paralleles mit anderer Funktion.

Ich stocke nur etwas bei Category:Kirchhofbefestigung (Eibelstadt). Für mich sieht dies eher wie eine Kirchhofsmauer aus, ist auch als das in Wikidata vermerkt. Der Name ist jedoch Befestigung und auf [1]https://geoportal.bayern.de/denkmalatlas/searchResult.html?objtyp=bau&koid=141446 ist es geführt als beides FlocciNivis (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Und ich habe hier mal ein SPARQL statement vorbereitet, welches Wikidata items mit commonscat sucht: https://query.wikidata.org/#SELECT%20%3Fitem%20%3Fcommonscat%0AWHERE%20%0A%7B%0A%20%20%3Fitem%20wdt%3AP31%20wd%3AQ40211238%20.%20%0A%20%20%3Fcommonscat%20schema%3Aabout%20%3Fitem%20%3B%20schema%3AisPartOf%20%3Chttps%3A%2F%2Fcommons.wikimedia.org%2F%3E%20.%0A%20%20%0A%7D

Selbiges lässt sich natürlich auch über die Wikidata ids für cemetery walls tun FlocciNivis (talk) 21:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Gratulation, die Runde scheint mir zu einem qualifizierten Ergebnis gekommen zu sein. Hatte die Diskussion gestern nicht auf dem Schirm. So bleibt mir nur eine Anmerkung zu Category:Kirchhofbefestigung (Eibelstadt): abgesehen davon, dass m.E. die deutlich übermannshohe Mauer den Wehrcharakter gut erkennen lässt, liefert der erste Absatz der dankenswerterweise in diese Kategorie eingestellten Seite aus "Die Kunstdenkmäler des Königreichs Bayern - Stadt und Bezirksamt Ochsenfurt" den entscheidenden Hinweis: "Die Kirche war mit einem befestigten Friedhof umgeben .... Östlich von der Kirche steht auch noch ein Torturm ....". Das war sicherlich deutlich mehr als eine normale Umfriedung, die nur die Würde des Ortes sicherstellen sollte.

Gruß an alle -- Im Fokus (talk) 07:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Super. Stimme Im Fokus zu. Die Gemeinsame Diskussion bzw. gute Einwände (AnRo, Atamari u.a.) haben uns hier weiter gebracht um es besser zu kategorisieren.

@FlocciNivis: Für die Category:Churchyard fortifications könnte auch die Category:Fortified churches in Germany durchforstet werden, ob es darunter Bilder gibt, welche primär die Befestigungsmauern zeigen.

Und @FlocciNivis and AnRo0002: : Könnte Category:Churchyard fortifications auch in Category:Defensive walls einsortiert werden?

Gruß -- Triple C 85 ^{| User talk |} 07:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

@Triplec85 Sehe nichts, was dagegen spricht. Diese Wehrmauern dienten, wie es der Name sagt, der Abwehr (vor allem marodierender Gruppen von Soldaten, Söldnern, Banditen), waren also Verteidigungsmauern. -- Im Fokus (talk) 08:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

@Triplec85 Das mit dem Durchforsten der Kategorie klingt sinnvoll. So wie es momentan ist, ist Bayern noch etwas überrepräsentiert, was die Kirchhofsbefestigungen angeht.

Das liegt übrigens, wie ich das sehe, daran, dass @Derzno alle/viele Objekte der Bayrischen Denkmalplattform nach Wikidata importiert hat. Er hat in meinen Augen hier einen tollen Job verrichtet.

Dementsprechend gibt es aber auch noch viele Churchyard walls/fortifications in Wikidata ohne Bilder. Ich würde euch alle darum bitten, diese einzusetzen, falls Bilder in commons vorhanden und euch das auffällt. Manchmal wäre es auch gut, das Label und die Description zu überarbeiten und eine commonscat zu kreieren.

Finden tut ihr diese Wikidata Objekte meist als Teil (property "has part") von dem Haupt-Denkmal (meist Kirche oder Friedhof) zu welchem die Mauer gehört. FlocciNivis (talk) 11:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210313 Views from Rechelkopf 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice view! --Explodingcreepsr 11:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210313 Views from Rechelkopf 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice view, good subject, but the camera's focus isn't that great. Made up for by subject --Explodingcreepsr 11:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200509State forest Saarbrücken 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Explodingcreepsr 11:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200417 Quartier Eurobahnhof 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Focus is borderline, but is made up for by the composition --Explodingcreepsr 11:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20191221Halberg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200705 Quellgebiet des Köllerbaches zwischen Großwald und Kirschhofer Tal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210603 Wilhelm-Meyer-Brücke Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Bahnhofstraße 24 St. Ingbert 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210417 Kondeler Bach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220416 Kleiner Hart Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide NSG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210612 Podarcis muralis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 20:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210612 Podarcis muralis 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210703 Schule Einöd Homburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210710 Bahnhof Neunkirchen Saar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210425 Gestapo-Lager Neue Bremm Saarbrücken 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210425 Soldatengrab Habsterhöhe Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210530 Aussichtspunkt Vogelfelsen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 11:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210603 Saarbahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210802 Ausbesserungswerk München-Freimann 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200709 Wassertor Bürgerpark Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210412 Wilhelm-Heinrich-Brücke Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20211010 Fußgängerbrücke Saarhölzbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 11:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20211010 Taben-Rodt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220528 Ruhebank Theodor von Zwehl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

File:20180915 Parc de l'Orangerie 01.jpg

File:20180915 Parc de l'Orangerie 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Peel (talk) 07:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180731Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180907 Statue of Béla Bartók Brussels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Matutinho 13:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200912 Krochhochhaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 11:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210207 Förderturm Schacht IV Grube Camphausen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Matutinho 13:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200721 Alopochen aegyptiacus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220802 Polistes dominula 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210412 Saaruferstraße Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210809 Westspange Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210809 Graffiti Hall-of-Fame 4560 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210911 Freundschaftsbrücke Klein-Großblittersdorf 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210911 Freundschaftsbrücke Klein-Großblittersdorf 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210207 Förderturm Schacht IV Grube Camphausen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20211010 Steinbruch Taben 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220102 Wegkreuz Inning am Ammersee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200705 Heusweiler 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would prefer a less centred position of the horizon, but overall good quality. --Milseburg 12:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200530 Apis mellifera 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegekreuz Zeller Feld Riegelsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:26, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220619 Sierck-les-Bains 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20221009 Votivkapelle Berg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200912 Alter Johannisfriedhof Leipzig 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Blown highlights, fixable? --Mike Peel 20:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC)  Done This is the most I can do. I hope it is enough. --FlocciNivis 09:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210320 Schloss Saareck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220312 Lustheim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220621 Hoferkopf 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction. --Ermell 11:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)  Done --FlocciNivis 17:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220709 Andrena 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sammandi 10:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220619 Sierck-les-Bains 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs PC --Poco a poco 11:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)  Done --FlocciNivis 14:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Not sure what is vertical here, but definitely better --Poco a poco 20:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210619 Landschaftsschutzgebiet Sylvensteinsee 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210617 Landschaftsschutzgebiet Isarauen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some Noise in the darker parts but still good quality. --Der Angemeldete 19:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210616 Apis mellifera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210612 Leucanthemum vulgare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 18:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210612 Corizus hyoscyami 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 16:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Fehlbestimmung von File:20220715 Palafoxia.jpg

Hallo FlocciNivis/Archive 3, ich habe keine Ahnung, wie Sie zu der Meinung kamen, dass der auf diesem Bild abgebildete Korbblütler eine Palafoxia sei. Das ist eine Gattung aus dem südlichen Nordamerika, bei der es zwar offenbar ein paar mit deutlich strahlenden Randblüten gibt, aber das sind dann Zungenblüten. Die Pflanzen auf Ihrem Bild haben am Rand vergrößerte, sterile Röhrenblüten. Das sind gärtnerisch "veredelte" Kornblumen (Centaurea cyanus) mit rosaroter Farbe, wie man sie häufig in Blühmischungen findet. Auf Commons gibt es erstaunlich wenige dieser Farbvarianten, aber z. B. File:Centaurées.jpg und File:Spring Scene (258275665).jpeg zeigen so etwas. Ich bin gerne bereit, alles zu korrigieren sowie den falschen Dateinamen korrigieren zu lassen und dann meine Stimme auf Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:20220715_Palafoxia.jpg zu entfernen, falls Sie das möchten. Ansonsten können Sie das natürlich gerne auch selbst erledigen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Hallo @Robert Flogaus-Faust, ja das war ein Fehler meinerseits. Ich habe selbst schon ein bisschen gesucht, seitdem Sie meine QI Nominierung kommentiert haben, bin aber selbst zu keinem Schluss gekommen. Die Blumen waren Teil einer Bienenaussaat nahe eines Feldes. Da ist es ja gut möglich, dass es ein Cultivar war.

Ich stelle das jetzt richtig. Vielen Dank für das Feedback!

Viele Grüße FlocciNivis (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210417 Beckinger Buchwald 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ah, Insects and flowers. Never a too old subject for a QI. --Der Angemeldete 12:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210417 Beckinger Buchwald 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice. --Der Angemeldete 12:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210417 Beckinger Saarblicke L 174 Brücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20221106 St. Valentin Unterföhring 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210829 St. Mauritius Erfweiler-Ehlingen 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 17:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210821 Schachtanlage Duhamel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 18:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210905 Bergehalde Grühlingstraße 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230106 Lorenzer Platz Nuremberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I think I remember this place :) --PantheraLeo1359531 21:10, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230107 Hauptmarkt Nuremberg HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 10:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210911 Bahnhof Auersmacher 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220130 Parkhaus P & R Fröttmaning 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220410 Nymphenburg Palace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA at the top left to remove. --Ermell 10:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)  Done and I also adjusted the lighting a bit --FlocciNivis 15:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20221020 Mangturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Both sides are leaning in --Poco a poco 17:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)  Done I performed PC --FlocciNivis 17:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220715 Centaurea cyanus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20221106 St. Valentin Unterföhring 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230107 Frauentor Nürnberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230107 Tratzenzwinger Nürnberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210417 Harmonia axyridis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180304 Boschbrücke 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190217Johannisbrücke Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190330 Spandau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)  Comment You may wish to improve categories? Surely there is more precise location possible rather than Spandau District. --A.Savin 01:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20191102Buspilz Halberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200408 Schanzenbergbrücke 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 19:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200621 Remparts de Rodemack 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200705St. Jakobus Kutzhof 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220702 Eristalis tenax 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220702 Sphaerophoria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190330 Spandau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Here we go again, where are appropriate categories? Bezirk Spandau ist groß... --A.Savin 21:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)  Done --FlocciNivis 22:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 02:53, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200705 Evangelische Pfarrkirche Wahlschied.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200705 Schule Heusweiler-Wahlschied 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20221231 Wasserturm Neuweiler Sulzbach Saar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:08, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200912 Altes Rathaus Leipzig 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201105 Kraftwerk Völklingen Fenne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop appears strange to me, everything of interest is in the upper 2/3 of the image and the lower third is only asphalt in the shade, can you crop out this?--NorbertNagel 15:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)  Done I cropped the foreground. More cropping would however destroy the composition imo --FlocciNivis 16:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC) I would have croped more, but ok now. --NorbertNagel 21:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210328 Alte Schmelz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210328 Alte Schmelz 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230211 Friedhof Plattling 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230122 Klinikum Schwabing 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210417 Bahnhof Beckingen Saar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couturier Villa Forbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Should the building have its own category? --Mike Peel 18:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC) Thank you. I didn't create a category, because I only had this one image. But it had its own information board, so arguably it might be important enough to warrant its own category --FlocciNivis 20:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220802 Bombus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220521 Bombus pascuorum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A little noisy, but good quality. --Mike Peel 18:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230107 Hirsvogelbunker 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230107 Hirsvogelbunker 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230129 Elisabethstraße 38 München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20221019 Zum Engel Kempten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20211008 Saarbrücke Mettlach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20221020 Brettermarkt 2 Fountain Lindau Bodensee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 15:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegkreuz Numborn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201010 St. Margareta Forst an der Weinstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200705Heusweiler Schulzentrum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:24, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200725 Luisenthal Saar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 16:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200725 Stadtwald Völklingen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very good image. I ask you to specify where exactly this bridge is. You could ad a geocode by using the template object location. --Augustgeyler 17:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC) It is inside the Stadtwald Völklingen, as specified in the file description and cats. I think it is at the coordinates 49.26358°N 6.87913°E / 49.26358; 6.87913, but I'm not completely sure, could also be a bit more to the south. --FlocciNivis 18:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)  Comment Is this the only bridge of that kind in that park? If not, I suggest adding this to the image with a parameter "prec:100" --Augustgeyler 18:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)  Done, there are probably more bridges --FlocciNivis 16:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Thank you! --Augustgeyler 17:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200823 Odakerstraße 4 Sankt Arnual.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200823 Saargemünder Straße 192 Sankt Arnual.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201010 Vogelschutzgebiet Haardtrand 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

File:20201010Michaelskapelle Deidesheim15.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201010Michaelskapelle Deidesheim15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200731 Betriebshof Nord U-Bahn München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220619 Gare d'Apach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:57, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220702 Halictus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180213 St. Martin Hechenwang 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 14:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200813 Forbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201105 Alter Bahnhof Völklingen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210116 Staatstheater Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200705St. Jakobus Kutzhof 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200423 Kraftwerk Völklingen Fenne 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200413State forest Saarbrücken3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 14:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220924 Kaiserhof Munich Residence 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 12:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220924 Wittelsbacher Fountain Munich Residence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. The motif of people taking photos with the smartphone has an interesting reference of the 2010s/2020s --PantheraLeo1359531 16:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210529 Idar-Oberstein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210529 Idar-Oberstein 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 11:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210529 Nahbollenbach Idar-Oberstein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Aciarium 15:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210529 Nahe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 11:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210529 Nahebrücke Gefallener Felsen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 11:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230129 Elisabethstraße 44 München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment very slightly tilted CCW. Otherwise good.--MB-one 11:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the feedback --FlocciNivis 16:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilige Familie Rentrisch 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:28, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historischer Kalkbrennofen Naturschutzgebiet Wolferskopf 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190906 Karlsruhe Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200116Spiemont 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 10:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180505 Saarkran.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzweg Bergehalde Lydia 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200725 Wildpark Völklingen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200725 Wildpark Völklingen 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201127 Fördergerüst Schacht 2 Göttelborn 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201127 Landabsatz Grube Göttelborn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180907 Grand Sablon Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200823 Grotte de Lourdes de Spicheren 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190324 Rotondes Explorations culturelles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200813 Château du Schlossberg Forbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200813 Château du Schlossberg Forbach 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201031 Herz-Jesu-Kirche Köllerbach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhofsempfangsgebäude Bahnhof Fürstenhausen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200705 Kutzhof 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200705 St. Erasmus Eiweiler 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality now.--Cayambe 08:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)