User talk:Ferengi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TUSC token e5b3d93037daf14d7d030d29c95cc5fc[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ferengi!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Stanford_Aerial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Diti the penguin 18:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image Rotation Request[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you rotated the picture of the Stanford Campus and mentioned that you can do this in an loss-free way. Could you maybe also rotate the image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:StanfordClockTower1.JPG in a loss-free way? I just uploaded iit, but it's rotated 90° Thank you. --Stacalusa (talk) 05:53, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--Stacalusa (talk) 09:22, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I am so surprised that others want to test the limit and possible steal a photo. Wikipedia can be great without being so aggressive. Pretty soon, Wikipedia will develop a worldwide reputation for unreliability, theft, teenaged admins, porn star articles, etc. That's bad. User F203 (talk) 14:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brasilian Airforce E-mail[edit]

"I'm not sure if I have picked up the most appropriate email address. Let's hope for an answer. --Ferengi (talk) 18:58, 10 June 2009 (UTC)"

Mark Burleigh writes here that he is willing to provide the E-mail address of his contact at the Brasilian Airforce. Teofilo (talk) 15:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On the same subject, I'm fluent in Portuguese and am willing to help with any translation requests you might have. - Antiuser (talk) 17:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you asked for the e-mail address to send on a request to publish the photo. Here it is: imprensa@gmail.com (the e-mail meant for journalists) or you could try faleconosco@fab.mil.br (given on the air force web site). I suggest keeping the request short, saying you would like confirmation that it is OK to use the photos given to the media on the wikipedia website.--Marc Burleigh (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:POT-MarinaFloisvou2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.49.26.65 07:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:POT-Psychiko.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.49.26.65 07:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures[edit]

I understand, and will attempt not to forget that, thank you for the heads up. Connormah (talk) 18:02, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francisco Franco&Carmencita Franco.jpg[edit]

good day, authors right explinting (author it dead in 70 years)... --Fredy.00 (talk) 11:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peliculiar, I am sorry this misunderstanding... ain't indeed two men same with same name? This photo im got from libraries in Czech republic, and there was recorded as though author dead in 1937 (year after photo). --Fredy.00 (talk) 14:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thank you toleration... bye :- ) --Fredy.00 (talk) 16:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Athens panorama from Melissia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments stiching problems see near the "amcor" tank in the foreground about a third into the picture from the left. Light intensity shifts across the sky (diagonal lines) caused by software when creating pano. Gnangarra 13:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)  Comment Restitched image with latest version of Photomerge, hopefully all artifacts gone. Please re-evaluate. --Ferengi 16:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Issues fix looks good Gnangarra 01:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:NTUA central library.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-Iconoclast (talk) 16:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:New electrical engineering building NTUA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-Iconoclast (talk) 16:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:Thomaidio Publishing Center NTUA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-Iconoclast (talk) 16:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete of NTUA building photos[edit]

Public buildings owned by the greek state are in the public domain. Tell me what law writes it. You don't find no law. Iconoclast (talk) 08:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Δεν υπαρχει τετοιος νομος για public domain. Το copyright μπορεί να είναι του Αρχιτέκτονα η του Δημοσίου αλλα διαρκεί 70 χρόνια από το θάνατο του δημιουργού. Οτι ανηκει στο Δημόσιο δεν είναι public domain.[reply]

Ρωτα ενα δικηγορο να σου τα πει σωστα.

Pictures of Miloš Forman from Flick[edit]

wait please 1 week, im try go to agreemnet with author --Fredy.00 (talk) 19:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Au secours[edit]

Bonjour, vous avez bien fait d'effacer ma photo de l'article du "Dauphiné Libéré" dont je n'ai toujours pas reçu l'autorisation écrite de publication sur wikimedia (je sens que ça mettra du temps !...)

Par ailleurs, on me demande d'ajouter les catégories de certaines autres photos et je n'arrive pas à trouver, à comprendre comment ajouter ces données. Voir : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JCAILLAT (== Au secours ==)

Merci beaucoup pour votre aide.--JCAILLAT (talk) 12:56, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What should I do? It was capture in 1956,need it permission? I made the picture from Youtube movie,so,I am the author,right?But how could I proof it?I hope you could give me a hand,thanks.--Rocking Man (talk) 02:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

God!It's crazy!The video is captured 50 years ago,doesn't it have any permission like "The history of the picture is more than 50 years,you guys could use is as you wish"?--Rocking Man (talk) 09:54, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All right,it's a bad news! When it's on deadline,finish the picture,thanks--Rocking Man (talk) 10:52, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate License Designation[edit]

I uploaded a photograph (jpeg file) for use on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Register_of_Historic_Places_listings_in_Santa_Cruz_County,_Arizona item #26, The Little Outfit Schoolhouse. The monitor(?) for this category (Historic Places), Ferengi, asked me to provide some basis for using Public Domain designation and I replied as follows:

The original photograph was taken by Charles Herbert in 1943, several copies are in the possession of students at the school at that time and there were no strings attached to the use of the photograph. After Herbert died in 1976 his wife gave his collection of photographs to the Arizona Historic Socitey. They have given me a copy of all the photographs they have of The Little Outfit Schoolhouse in that collection and the image I have used here is not among them. Therefore I believe there is no ownership of this image and anyone can use it as they choose, i.e., that it is in the public domain.

In a later exchange with Ferengi I added the following:

You [Ferengi] reviewed this rationale and concluded it was not a valid basis for the "public domain" designation. I don't dispute your conclusion but I am at a loss as to how I can now use this image. Charles Herbert has been dead over thirty years, he had no children, his wife is dead as well and so far as I can see there would be no "estate" which could claim copyright rights or give permission to use the image.

So I am looking for help on how to proceed -- is there a licensing designation consistent with Wikipedia's requirements for material used and also consistent with the above description on this photo?

Thank you for your help.

Durward3 22OCT2009

Deux vidéos pour une ![edit]

Bonjour Ferengi, cet après-midi j'ai converti une vidéo divX en Ogg avec VLC. Cette vidéo est entièrement sans droits d'auteurs pour mes images et la musique a été générée par « Medal Composer », un robot qui compose des mélodies orchestrées libres de droits (voir article Wikipédia : « René-Louis Baron » ou www.realcomposer.com. Cependant la convertion ne devait pas être réussie puisque le fichier final Ogg ne se lisait pas. Aussi, j'ai utilisé « ffmpeg2theora.exe » avec le sytème de commande un peu fastidieux mais j'ai obtenu un fichier moins lourd que le précédent et surtout qui se lit sur Wikimedia. Je voudrais donc effacer le premier upload : File:Stéphane Baron - Stucco et Graffitto.ogg afin de ne conserver que le dernier :

Olympia de Paris[edit]

Hello Ferengui, I've found the file... It exists ! : The other name is "File:Olympia salle.jpg" ... I think there is some cleaning more (difference with the first one)! Excuse-me to answer to day (You wrote one month ago !!!). Now, I think I'm better in wikiMedialogy. Thanks for your help. Cordialy.--JCAILLAT (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Goran Jelisić commiting murder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Martin H. (talk) 13:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Ecofin Papadimos Sarris Alogoskoufis 2007 07 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ggia (talk) 12:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:Loukas Papademos ECOFIN 2007.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ggia (talk) 12:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhodes_airport_control_tower_and_terminal.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.131.15 19:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you![edit]

Είσαι γρήγορος! Οι φωτογραφίες του Τεό ήταν υπό cc-by-nd στο flickr, όπως όλες οι φωτογραφίες του φωτογράφου. Του ζήτησα το πρωί να αλλάξει την άδεια για να τις ανεβάσω και το έκανε. Πάρε μια μπύρα από εμένα, αφού πρόλαβες να τις ανεβάσεις πρώτος!  :-) Geraki TLG 17:12, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greek[edit]

I will find a way upgrade the legends. In both way I have to edit all pages. Yug (talk) 17:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

???[edit]

Both Mehmed Djavid and Hasan Tahsin are Sabbateans. Why did you make one of them Muslim and other Jew ? Takabeg (talk) 13:04, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that some categories including religious factor such as Muslims of Salonica, Jews of Salonica, Christians of Salonica are not appropriate to categories related with place of birth. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 09:00, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Moreover "Dönmeh" are not regarded as Jews. If you prove the importance of religious factor of (each) person, you can put religious category in addition to category related with place of birth (Category:People of Thessaloniki). Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 09:13, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Muslims of Thessaloniki[edit]

Since the category:Muslims of Salonika exists it really makes no sense not to include the muslims of Thessaloniki in it. I agree with you that religion is not the encyclopedic factor for most of them so I would agree to add Muslims of Salonika alongside People of Thessaloniki. I definitely do not agree that to add them would require proof of importance. I would however consider renaming the category, since it seems that originally it was meant to categorize the muslim culture and tradition of Thessaloniki, not the muslim people. So maybe we should rename it to something like Category:Muslim culture of Thessaloniki? --Ferengi (talk) 09:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've created Category:Islam in Salonica simply because I could find Category:Islam in Berlin and couldn't find Category:Muslim culture by city. But now I think Category:Islam in Thessaloniki is better. I don't understand why I preferred Salonica to Thessaloniki :) This category can be renamed. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 10:31, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject[edit]

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Commons' coverage of aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! russavia (talk) 04:13, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:POT-Psychiko.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Diannaa (talk) 23:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dimitris Papadimoulis.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PanchoS (talk) 05:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Яй (talk) 15:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Βαζάκας.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 06:58, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boy on dolphin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Geraki TLG 14:54, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

People with mobile telephones has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 21:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:DH Burns-Morgan House.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:DH Burns-Morgan House.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]