User talk:F l a n k e r/Archive3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi! If you want to send me a message, please send it to my Italian discussion page here. Thank you!


File:Tupolev_Tu-160_at_MAKS-2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, F l a n k e r!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 12:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

South African Airforce[edit]

Hello! I've noticed there are only two of SAAF roundels in Wikipedia. Can you, please, do more historical ones? Many thanks!--Kwasura (talk) 19:17, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tire code SVG[edit]

I must say you did a pretty good work on this, I would like to add I was also working on SVG'ing this and had most of the image done already and found it was already available in SVG 30 minutes later haha, I had the mountain+snowflake logo done already so I just pasted it in yours instead :) TiCPU (talk) 26 September 2009

Are you working on the second truck tire, as it seems you didn't put the first one in effect on the tire code page yet? TiCPU (talk) 12:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Army ranks[edit]

Hi! Thanks for your comment! It was deleted because it was lacking licence for over two years. However, some users (including you) have objected to speedy deleting it, that's why there will be a deletion request created and open for discussion shortly. You will obviously be notified as soon as that is done. Thanks again! Powerek38 (talk) 13:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:IT-Airforce-OF-8.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Powerek38 (talk) 14:05, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Italian-navy-cap-badge.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Powerek38 (talk) 14:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Re: File:Bandiera di combattimento per le Forze Armate della Repubblica Sociale Italiana.jpg[edit]

Hi Flanker! I was wondering if you could do me a BIG favour and design a flag for the Bandiera di combattimento per le Forze Armate della Repubblica Sociale Italiana(1 dicembre 1943 - 5 maggio 1944). As it stands at the moment, it is simply a copy from a website. Could you please base it on the flag of the Kingdom of Italy, Royal Army model 1860. File:Flag of Italy (1860).svg Many sincere thanks! Markab.

Sorry Flanker! if you click on the file above you will see what I mean. The RSI Flag is fine, it's the other smaller flag that I'm referring to. I apologize...... Regards, Markab. --Markab1975 (talk) 05:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Better (re)name?[edit]

Hi File:30°StormoBT-Patch.svg needs an other rename because the suggested name is in use. --MGA73 (talk) 16:18, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Card back 11.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--- Zil (d) 18:38, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Agatha_Christie.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Trixt (talk) 20:30, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Drapeau armée de l'air Empire Russe et 1er Drapeau armée de l'air Soviétique en SVG[edit]

Bonjour, j'aimerai enrichir l'article Armée de l'air russe

avec le drapeau armee de l'air de l'Empire Russe 1894-1917 http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/ru^af.html#o19

le 1er drapeau de l'armee de l'air de l'Union sovietique en 1924 http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/su^af.html#old

Merci beaucoup joyeux Noel --Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 10:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian Air Force roundel 1946[edit]

File:Bulgarian Air Force roundel 1946.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Bulgarian Herald (talk) 22:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Io penso che la GdF abbia qualche sorta di diritto su quest'immagine... no? Fale (talk) 22:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perfetto :) Volevo solo sapere se avevi controllato la cosa o meno... e vedo che l'hai fatto :) Grazie Fale (talk) 11:56, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mappe[edit]

Guardando Atlas of Italy ho notato che non include una mappa IMHO importante tipo File:Map_of_Italy-it.svg che riporti tutti i capoluoghi di provincia (o quanto meno le loro targhe), magari tu o qualcun altro potreste realizzarla in poco tempo. --Elitre (talk) 20:03, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:CoA of the RSI.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sukhoi Su-35BM - 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

[1] --Droni4ch (talk) 12:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sukhoi Su-35BM - 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

[2] --Droni4ch (talk) 12:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello F l a n k e r.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

High Contrast (talk) 18:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

I'm, sorry, but you are mistaken. Those flags do belong in the Naval Ensigns category. We have categories for flags based on common features or use. This is in keeping with such categories as "blue ensigns" and "state ensigns". Please do not remove the flags in question from the Naval Ensigns category, which is meant to be a common category for all naval ensigns world-wide. Fry1989 (talk) 21:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've been at work all day. I still disagree that the Egyptian ensigns shouldn't be in the Naval Ensigns category. As I said, it's a common category for all naval ensigns. I understand that there's such a thing as over-categorization, but I don't feel this is it. Some flags have over a dozen categories or more. The Egyptian ensigns has far less. Fry1989 (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but I disagree, it is not an overcategorization, You seem to be missing the point of the category. Fry1989 (talk) 23:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of Arms[edit]

Hello Flanker: I've got a request. Excuse me I do not speak very good English. I wonder if you can perform the following arms.

Quarterly: 1st. and 4th. Argent, a fleur-de-lys Sable; 2nd. and 3rd. Azure, a cross fleurdelise Or. Bordure Gules, eight saltires Or.

The Coat of Arms it belongs to the lady, Ms. Nahuel de Yñigo. I'm doing an article on wikipedia and hoped to raise the shield.

Regards.

Retaux.

Hi Retaux, if I understand it well, the coat of arms must be like this one. I can't help you this week-end, but on monday I'm at the computer again and I'll try to make the image. --F l a n k e r (talk) 18:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here you go: File:Coat of arms of the House of de Yñigo.svg. Hope you like it. --F l a n k e r (talk) 18:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

segnali stradali[edit]

Ciao. Mi dispiace che te la sia presa (penso che anche io avrei fatto la stesso), però ti avevo scritto nella pagina di discussione di wiki italia e non mi avevi più risposto e così ho pensato che ti andasse bene...se sei d'accordo parliamone là. Ciau! --Gigillo83 (talk) 07:44, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need help[edit]

Dear Flanker, hope you are doing well. Can you, please, modify this image to this standard? Many thanks and all the best! --Kwasura (talk) 14:58, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Borromeo Coat of arms[edit]

Dear Flanker, please look at your italian discussion page. Best wishes, -- LeoDavid 14:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flanker! Now it's definitely correct. Thank you very much for reporting : ) Best regards, -- LeoDavid 18:01, 10 November 2010

File source is not properly indicated: File:MiG-23-red12.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MiG-23-red12.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 09:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Source founded and added with the help of User:Cobatfor. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 17:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that the rings are supposed to be interlaced, as in File:Tempietto, formelle 18 impresa personale di lorenzo de' medici.JPG, and not just placed one on top of the other. See Borromean rings for explanation (unfortunately no article on the Italian Wikipedia)... AnonMoos (talk) 11:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the uploads was that recent versions of Inkscape insert """ codes in internal links (to gradients, etc.), and RSVG doesn't like it. I could have fixed it, but you got around to it first... AnonMoos (talk) 00:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and of course thanks for changing it... AnonMoos (talk) 01:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan arms 1978-1980.svg[edit]

Hello! Could you edit this image? The ribbons should be red; letters of the ribbons, ears (spikes), star and central letters should be golden; background is red. A example image, and other (decoration of the goverment, the most credible). (Sorry for a possible mistake, I am not native speaker of english.) Sincerely,--Falerístico (talk) 14:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved.--Falerístico (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stemmi del Vaticano[edit]

Visto che da queste parti sembri bazzicare più che su it.Wiki, e sperando sapendo di non arrivare troppo tardi, ti segnalo questa richiesta.--DoppioM 15:04, 3 feb 2011 (CET)

File:Greater_coat_of_arms_of_the_Russian_empire.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tryphon 12:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:RSAF_Roundel.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Cheers, JackLee talk 08:00, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. If you are unhappy with the decision, you may ask for re-consideration at Commons:Undeletion requests. --Leyo 19:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did your "optimization" increase the file seize significantly? -- AnonMoos (talk) 03:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I probably don't have a great enough interest in the matter to download the two files and compare them textually. Nevertheless, when most people speak of "optimizing" an SVG file, they mean decreasing its size (not increasing it)... AnonMoos (talk) 18:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bahamas_Defence_Force_Air_Wing_fin_flash.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 00:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Armed forces rank insignia request ?[edit]

Hey Flanker
Is it possible to request rank insignia for e.g. :
Royal Danish Navy "OR"'s ? :


or for the Royal Danish Airforce :


and :


I'd love to help, but i'm no good been creativ ;-)...
best regards
Gddea - Daniel E. Als-Juliussen (talk) 12:49, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

stemma da inserire[edit]

--Saro.g (talk) 13:24, 16 November 2011 (UTC)se vuoi lo stemma del 57° gruppo (armoriale aeronautica) te lo posso dare io[reply]

Aviation Wikiproject on Commons?[edit]

Hey mate, I've had an idea of starting an Aviation WikiProject on Commons. I have created a page at User talk:Russavia/Proposal where I hope that if other editors think this is a good idea, we can all come up with ideas, etc. Please keep all comments on that page for time being, and if you know of other editors on Commons or on other language projects who might be interested in commenting, coming up with ideas, etc, please let them know of the discussion. Let's see if this could be a workable project. russavia (talk) 18:00, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Medici and the arms[edit]

I hope I have the right place lol .. Anyway, I was wondering if you would be able to separate the Tuscan Grand ducal crown from one of these images 1 / 2. I would like to try an make a coat of arms which would relate to all the Medici Grand Dukes (I mean like in this pic). Hope that makes sense =] Songsblame (talk) 03:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Ludwigowitsch Bartini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 11:36, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of Arms of Indonesia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-iNu- (talk) 16:58, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]