User talk:Ermell/Archive/2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Jakob-Statue-Barbara-1093132-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenstadt-Kirche-1103389-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice ,good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenstadt-Taufbecken-1103375-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenstadt-Innenraum-1103370-hdr4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I would also support it as FPC! --Uoaei1 13:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenstadt-Innenraum-1103360-hdr4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I would also support it as FPC! --Uoaei1 13:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenstadt-Kanzel-1103355-hdr4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Jakob-Bamberg-1093111-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Jakob-1093118-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Jakob-Statue-Anna-1093135-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenstadt-Kirche-1103401-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engelhardsberg-Wegkapelle -P1270611-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps it is better that you are above what cuts (Law of 1/3). But for me, good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberschwarzach-Relief-9133118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenstadt-Kirche-Decke-1103337-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenstadt-Kirche-Orgel-1103345-hdr-PS-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weihnachtskrippe-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please check the filename. Location would be nice. --XRay 17:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC) Comment Filename fixed and discription of the location added. Thanks for reviewing.--Ermell 22:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weihnachtskrippe-1052655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but if possible, please add location (a church?). --Palauenc05 21:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC) Comment Location added. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 22:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sankt-Martin-Bamberg-1062846hdr.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sankt-Martin-Bamberg-1062846hdr.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Code (talk) 16:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosengarten-6299250 1 2N.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosengarten-Bamberg--6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perspective issue. --Jacek Halicki 09:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC) Done New version which I hope works better.Thanks for the review.--Ermell 21:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC) Support--Jacek Halicki 23:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosengarten-Bamberg--5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perspective issue. --Jacek Halicki 09:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC) Done Fixed version which I hope works better.Thanks for the review.--Ermell 21:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC) Support--Jacek Halicki 23:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosengarten-Bamberg-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosengarten-Bamberg--4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Jakob-1093214-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Jakob-1093210-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. No clue why nobody promoted this so far. --Uoaei1 07:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Jakob-1093209-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amlingstadt-church-1010001-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amlingstadt-church-pulpit-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amlingstadt-church-chancel-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amlingstadt-pipe-organ-1010019-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amlingstadt-nativity-scene1010041efs-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amlingstadt-church-sebastian-statue-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amlingstadt-church-mater-dolorosa-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amlingstadt-St.Elisabeth-statue-1010067-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amlingstadt-Wendelin-statue-1010072-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amlingstadt-angel-child-statue-1010082-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Anyway good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stettfeld-Kirche-8011128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, good perspective but I would cut a bit from the sky or if possible show more churchyard --Michielverbeek 14:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC) Done New version which I hope is better. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 07:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC) Now, a Q1 photo --Michielverbeek 07:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memmelsdorf-Kirche-Altarraum-1050033 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memmelsdorf-Kirche-Altar-1050046 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memmelsdorf-Orgel-1050053-HDr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A nice self portrait! --Hubertl 10:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memmelsdorf-Kirche-Kanzel-1050074-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memmelsdorf-Kirche-1050088-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memmelsdorf-Kirche-1050102-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelbach-Kirche-8011150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufsesstal-2013--11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:11, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelbach-Orgel-8011141-hdr-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelbach-Orgel-8011144-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelbach-Kanzel-8011149-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gappatjavri-Norwegen-P1270859-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:52, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gappatjavri-Norwegen-P1270860-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments seems somewhat saturated, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gappatjavri-Norwegen-P1290539-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments high quality, a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 16:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gappatjavri-Norwegen-P1270863-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schweden-Gideälven-P1270672.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:38, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schweden-Gideälven-P1270673.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Lebesby-2014-P1270755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Lebesby-2014-P1270756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Lebesby-P1270749.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Adamsfjordelva-bridge-P1290548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Adamsfjordelva -P1290549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-P1270869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelbach-Kirche-8011138-hdr-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Bekkarfjord-2014-P1290451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Bekkarfjord-2014-P1290453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Bekkarfjord-2014-P1290454.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gappatjavri-Norwegen-P1270866-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, well done contrast --A.Savin 00:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufsesstal-2013--12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice --A.Savin 00:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Lebesby-P1270753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seehof-220116-1225129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schienen-Fahrrad-fuer-Bergwerke-7300941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seehof-220116-1225130hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:51, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seehof-220116-1225185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wadendorf-Mühle-220116-1225262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Höfen-Kruzifix-220116-1225369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruderwald-220116-1225374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments F 2.8 is not ideal, but for me oké.--Famberhorst 16:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruderwald-220116-1225389-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Kirche-P1245720hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-P1245652hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-church-organ-loft-P1245643hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-church-Interior-P1245613PS-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-church-organ-P1245641hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-church-Interior-P1245630hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-Altar-P1245604PS-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-Altar-P1245591hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-Kirche-P1245574hdr1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Lebesby-P1270751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 20:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-P1290553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great mood, but noisy background --Daniel Case 05:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC) Done Thank you--Ermell 13:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC) OK, good. Daniel Case 05:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-P1245661hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-P1245655hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-P1245658hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-P1245664hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-P1245669hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seehof-220116-1225127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Lebesby kirke-P1270750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments see the note please--Livioandronico2013 20:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC) Done Hope it`s better now. Thaks for reviewing--Ermell 08:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC) Ok--Livioandronico2013 00:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-church-Altar-P1245682hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-church-Altartisch-P1245676hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-church-Wandbild-P1245673hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-church-pulpit--P1245670hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pettstadt-Eisenbahn-P1296656.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharp photo, darkness in the photo gives something extra --Michielverbeek 14:45, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pettstadt-EisenbahnbrückeP1296672.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 14:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pettstadt-Eisenbahnbrücke-P1296673.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 14:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pettstadt-Eisenbahnbrücke-P1296678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crucifix-Ketschendorf-P1245691PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:33, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienbild-Gunzendorf-Kirche-P1245752PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle-Ketschendorf-P1245700PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ketschendorf-Fachwerkhaus-P1245696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 13:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Gemälde-Kirche-P1245756hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Statue-Kirche-P1245771hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Krippe-P1245777hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 15:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle-Bug-P1316721PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle-Bug-P1316719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle-Bug-P1316705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Bauernhof-P1245796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Kirche-P1245792.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:50, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Kirche-P1245785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Kirchendecke-P1245705PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-Saint-Barbara-statue-P1245688hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:50, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Gemälde-Kirche-P1245759hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:50, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle-Bug-P1316706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-Saint-John-statue-P1245685hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But I would like a bit tighter crop -- Spurzem 10:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche-Kanzel-Gunzendorf-P1245744hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Statue-Saint-WendelinP1245710hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Statue-Saint-WendelinP1245710hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-BambergP2026805PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Altar-Bamberg-P2026800hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-Altar-P2026796hdr-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-Kanzel-P2026785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Organ-ST.Otto-Bamberg-P2026762hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ST.Otto-Bamberg-Intereur-P2026758HDRPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Saint-Anthony-P1245713hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-P2026810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-window-P2026768hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Lebesby-P1270752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-Fenster-P2026772hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-statue-P2026880PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In first instance the photo did not impressed me, but when I look much better to the image I get the feeling I am just standing in front of the statue - a Q1one --Michielverbeek 08:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-relief-P2026923PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-statue-P2026916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnlinie-Saalestauseen-8132386 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-statue-P2026911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-statue-P2026906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-Fenster-P2026851hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2067001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 12:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2067000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2066996.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnlinie-Saalestauseen-8132389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-Baptismal-P2026816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-Fenster-P2026846hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2067000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Ermell, you nominated the same photo yesterday. --C messier 14:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Comment Oops, seems that I`m losing the overview with all the similar engines in my collection. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 10:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2066976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2066971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnlinie-Saalestauseen-8132392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-BambergST.Otto-Bamberg-P2026817hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Wappen-Torhaus-P2077096PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, however a bit dark --Uoaei1 09:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Comment I agree. Uploaded a brighter version.Thank you.--Ermell 09:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2067012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2066975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2066977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Gemälde--Kirche-P1245765hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The white wall looks a little bit too much to PS brush tool, especially the transition to the shadow. Also, the perspective needs some enhancements. You could use perspective warp for this task. --Cccefalon 15:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review and hint. I usually try to work on the perspective by hand trying to match the grid but perspective warp is a bit easier. Next time I will take only one painting alone which might be not so complycated.--Ermell 23:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC) Much better. --Cccefalon 05:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-P2077089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-P2077064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why f2.8? Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2067021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnlinie-Saalestauseen-8132387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The tunnel is dark, but the detail can still be seen. Good quality. --Prosthetic Head 15:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-statue-P2026901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnlinie-Saalestauseen-8132374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 17:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eugen Jochum (German conductor).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment: Also, doesn't this need to be geocoded? --DAJF (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment: Geocodet? Why should that be useful?--Ermell (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment It is strongly advised. But in this case the value of geocoding is not obvious. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-statue-P2026860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-Fenster-P2026838hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2066983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnlinie-Saalestauseen-8132385 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlöserkirche-Bamberg-Kanzel-P2107347hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Kirche-Orgel-P2077102hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Kirche-P2077112hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-church-Altar-P2077117hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Kirche-P2077196hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlöserkirche-Bamberg-P2107337hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlöserkirche-Bamberg-Taufbecken-P2107362hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlöserkirche-Bamberg-Kruzifix-P2107367hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Erker-P2077052PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2067019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnlinie-Saalestauseen-8132381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Wappen-Relief-P2077209PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2066978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-statue-P2026865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-BambergST.Otto-Bamberg-P2026822hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2066990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2066981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-statue-P2026855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-Kanzel-P2026780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-statue-P2026896.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-statue-P2026885.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlöserkirche-Bamberg-Taufbecken-P2107357hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlöserkirche-Bamberg-P2107342hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nankendorf-Martinuskirche-2-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Schlosshof-P2077086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2066967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auferstehungskirche-Bamberg-P2137432HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auferstehungskirche-Bamberg-P2137452hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auferstehungskirche-Bamberg-Taufstein-P2137437hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlöserkirche-Bamberg-P2137418PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auferstehungskirche-Bamberg-Orgel-P2137427HDR-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auferstehungskirche-Bamberg-P2137415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ST.Otto-Bamberg-Intereur-P2026752hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Florstein 08:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St.Otto-Bamberg-Altar-P2026748HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 08:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunzendorf-Gemälde-Kirche-P1245762hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auferstehungskirche-Bamberg-Kanzel-P2137447hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-Kirche-P2147547HDRPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-Fenster-P2147557hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf-Gasthaus-P2147538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:56, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Liebherr-crane-4295172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC), yes a beautiful one --Michielverbeek 09:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 09:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Kirche-P2077127hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Kirche-P2077137hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wappen-Thurnau-Kirche-P2077152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenheim-Altar-P1245602hdr-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough to be a Q1one --Michielverbeek 09:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auferstehungskirche-Bamberg-P2137468PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO DoF too small and too much noise. And broken page content. --XRay 08:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC) Comment Tried to fix the mistakes if that matters. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 09:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Very weak  Support Some issues are fixed. It's not the best image, but IMO acceptable now. --XRay 12:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wappen-Thurnau-Kirche-P2077159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-Altar-P2147552hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trabelsdorf-castle-P2147643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf-Forsthaus-P2147541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-wappen-P2077039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Kirche-P2077132hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wappen-Thurnau-Kirche-P2077157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf-war-memorial-P2147540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-Kirchturm-P2147627PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf-church-P2147544.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted --A.Savin 11:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 13:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 13:04, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-wappen-P2077043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-wappen-P2077042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wappen-Thurnau-Kirche-P2077158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-Kirche-P2147632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medlitz-Haus-P4123784 Oberfranken-hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp loocal photo, a Q1one --Michielverbeek 08:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-wappen-P2077041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-wappen-P2077038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medlitz-Haus-P4123787 Oberfranken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Tür-P2077090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Sankt-Heinrich-Bamberg-P2137486hdr.jpg

Hallo ermell,

das Foto File:Sankt-Heinrich-Bamberg-P2137486hdr.jpg ist großartig und ich hatte eigentlich vor, es für FPC zu nominieren. Allerdings ist mir dann bei der Recherche aufgefallen, dass die Kirche nach Plänen von Michael Kurz errichtet wurde, der erst 1957 verstorben ist. Das heißt, dass seine Arbeit erst 2027 gemeinfrei wird. Da wir hinsichtlich von Innenräumen von Gebäuden keine Panoramafreiheit haben (§ 59 UrhG) dürfte das Foto im Ergebnis wohl leider eine Urheberrechtsverletzung sein, es sei denn natürlich, Du hast eine Zustimmung des oder der Erben von Michael Kurz oder - falls die Rechte an dem architektonischen Werk bei jemand anderem liegen - von dem abweichenden Rechteinhaber eingeholt. Ich würde mich über Deine Meinung zu dem Problem freuen. Ich wollte nicht einfach ohne Dich gefragt zu haben einen Löschantrag stellen.

Viele Grüße

--Code (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo code,

da bin ich jetzt überrascht und muß gestehen das ich nicht an diese, allerdings wichtigen Feinheiten gedacht habe. Fotos vom Innenraum dieser Kirche gibt es aber schon seit 2010 File:Bamberg_st.heinrich_innenhinten2592x1944_mr.JPG File:Bamberg st.heinrich innenchor1944x2592 mr.JPG Entweder wurde die Urheberrechtsfrage schon mal geklärt oder es hat sich noch niemand dran gestört.

Wenn die Bilder gelöscht werden müssen läßt sich das nicht ändern. Kirchen gibt´s genug in Franken.

Gruß --Ermell (talk) 07:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)von Reinhold

Hallo Reinhold,

ich habe den Löschantrag jetzt gestellt, mal sehen, was dabei rauskommt. Ich möchte aber nochmal betonen, dass ich Deine Bilder wirklich großartig finde und der Löschantrag keineswegs als Angriff auf Dich oder die Qualität Deiner Fotos gemeint ist. Ich hoffe, Du nimmst es mir nicht übel. Letztlich geht es auch darum, Dich als Uploader vor möglichen Konsequenzen einer versehentlichen Urheberrechtsverletzung zu schützen.

Übrigens solltest Du möglicherweise mal Deine Talk-Page durch einen Bot archivieren lassen, offenbar ist die schon zu groß, um noch richtig angezeigt zu werden.

Viele Grüße

--Code (talk) 11:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo code,

das nehme ich nicht persönlich und akzeptiere die Wichtigkeit das Urheberrechts. Wie sieht das denn aus mit Kirchen bei denen neue Altäre hinzugefügt wurden. Doch wohl so ählich?--Ermell (talk) 16:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Es kommt darauf an, ob der Altar urheberrechtlich schutzfähig ist. Ist er schutzfähig, kommt es darauf an, ob er eventuell nur Beiwerk ist. Ist er schutzfähig und nicht Beiwerk, darf man das Foto ohne Einwilligung des Urhebers nicht veröffentlichen. --Code (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Code (talk) 11:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tütschengereuth-church-P2147653hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tütschengereuth-P2147703hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tütschengereuth-church-P2147648HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-wappen-P2077044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Heinrich-font-Bamberg-P2137506hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Photo placed in Bamberg page. ta for this

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-260216-2268287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-260216-2268278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Heinrich-entrance-Bamberg-P2137479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Heinrich-doorknob-Bamberg-P2137515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Sankt-Heinrich-Bamberg-P2137486hdr.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Heinrich-Bamberg-P2137486hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-Tractor-260216-2268290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Heinrich-Bamberg-P2137519PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Heinrich-entrance-Bamberg-P2137478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Heinrich-entrance-Bamberg-P2137477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 09:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-260216-2268286.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P2066967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-260216-2268272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-260216-2268292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-260216-2268293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-tractor-Breitengüßbach-280216-2288413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-tractor-Breitengüßbach-280216-2288419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CA in some of the trees, but that's normal for overcast days and I'm not disturbed by it.--Vivo 10:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-tractor-Breitengüßbach-280216-2288420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-tractor-Breitengüßbach-280216-2288422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-St.Kilian-P2217852HDR1PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-St.Kilian-P2217870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-St.Kilian-P2217872hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-St.Kilian-P2217881hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo to main object --Michielverbeek 12:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Heinrich-door-Bamberg-P2137513PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-drill-Breitengüßbach-280216-2288460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-tractor-Breitengüßbach-280216-2288411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-tractor-Breitengüßbach-280216-2288430PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-130064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merkendorf-Sankt-Josef-271926efs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-St.Kilian-P2217890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-St.Kilian-P2217895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-St.Kilian-P2217885hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-St.Kilian-P2217936hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-St.Kilian-P2217927hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 08:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-Ansgar-statueP2147626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-P2147624.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 08:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-Burg-P2147630PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trabelsdorf-Brauerei-P2147640PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-St.Kilian-P2217857hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side leaning in --Uoaei1 14:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 22:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)  Support --Uoaei1 09:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberhaid-St. Bartholomäus-Decke-P2218052hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberhaid-St. Bartholomäus-Glasfenster-P2218042hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberhaid-St. Bartholomäus-Altarraum-P2217947hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberhaid-St. Bartholomäus-Maria-P2218007hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberhaid-St. Bartholomäus-Saint-Nicholas-P2218017hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteroberndorf-ICE-Baustelle-3068646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteroberndorf-ICE-Baustelle-3068650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf-Gasthaus-P2147545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support better now --Christian Ferrer 12:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC) +1 --Berthold Werner 17:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf-church-P2147532PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-castle-P2147618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It was not the most bewautiful weather to make excellent photos, but I cannot deny it is a Q1, sharp enough and a good composition --Michielverbeek 23:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walsdorf-Epitaph-P2147530PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-castle-P2147619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteroberndorf-ICE-Baustelle-3068648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteroberndorf-ICE-Baustelle-3068649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-280216-2288433PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-Statue-P2147597hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seemed a little tilt to the left, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-statue-P2147588hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-font-P2147567hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-castle-P2147620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteroberndorf-ICE-Baustelle-3068652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-Fresco-P2147572hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The cross in front seems a bit overprocessed, but ok. --Hubertl 13:59, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteroberndorf-ICE-Baustelle-3068653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-ICE-Baustelle-3068665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merkendorf-farmhouse-271951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:57, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-statue-P2147577hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:21, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegmarter-3068676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-ICE-Baustelle-3068663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-ICE-Baustelle-3068659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegmarter-3068681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zapfendorf-ICE-Baustelle-3068704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-EpitaphP2077068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Epitaph-P2077069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Epitaph-P2077070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-ICE-Baustelle-3068661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zapfendorf-ICE-Baustelle-3068705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A nice composition because in first instance it looks perspective is not good but that is just an optical illusion. Great !! --Michielverbeek 07:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Epitaph-P2077071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Epitaph-P2077074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Epitaph-P2077075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurnau-Epitaph-P2077078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegmarter-3068682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberhaid-St. Bartholomäus-Saint-Joseph-P2218022hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trabelsdorf-Brauerei-P2147642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Above what cramped, but good quality.--Famberhorst 16:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine-Rauheneck-270216-2278312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:00, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine-Rauheneck-270216-2278320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine-Rauheneck-270216-2278323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-MemmelsdorferstrasseP2228157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-MemmelsdorferstrasseP2228155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-ZollnerstrasseP2228123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisberg-altar-P2147582hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limbach-mater-dolorosa-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Rftblr 08:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria-Limbach-Orgel-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Rftblr 08:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limbach-Kanzel-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Rftblr 08:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria-Limbach-Kanzel-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Rftblr 08:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria-Limbach-Altar-92PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although the image would benefit from a slight perspective correction: the left verticals are vertical, but the right verticals are slightly tilted inwards. -- Rftblr 08:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC) Comment Tanks for review and hint. I hope its better now.--Ermell 20:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)  CommentYes, its good now. Thanks. --Rftblr 00:42, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria-Limbach-Altar-64PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria-Limbach-Altar-7-2PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-MemmelsdorferstrasseP2228142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-ZollnerstrasseP2228140PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-ZollnerstrasseP2228117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegmarter-3068678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Any chance to save the sky? It is severely blown. --C messier 15:07, 14 March 2016 (UTC) Comment Tried to fix the sky and hope it´s better now.Thanks for rewieving--Ermell 21:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment I would choose sth less dramatic and blurred for a background, for me this is a  weak support. More opinions appreciated. --C messier 09:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! China Schanghai 5166312 3 4N-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoellental-7300967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleuse-100-P4052850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laurenziplatz-9122973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:33, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michelsberg-Villa-Remeis-210116-1215071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michelsberg-Sankt-Getreu-210116-1215086-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharp photo, rare sky colour but I think it is natural --Michielverbeek 08:17, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obere-Pfarre-und-Sankt-Stephan-210116-1215094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-ZollnerstrasseP2228100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-ZollnerstrasseP2228096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Moosstraße-P2177805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Moosstraße-P2177800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Moosstraße-P2177784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 09:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Geisfelder-Strasse-P2137406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Geisfelder-Strasse-P2137405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139462.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Betzenstein-1120250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine-Rauheneck-270216-2278389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine-Rauheneck-270216-2278390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:48, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine-Rauheneck-270216-2278388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine-Rauheneck-270216-2278381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The oe are doesn't disturb me, QI --Poco a poco 16:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139464.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An excellent artistic composotion, a beautiful sky, but it might be sharper - a week support --Michielverbeek 23:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pottenstein-Easter-foutain-P4194468PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Rftblr 09:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pottenstein-Easter-foutain-P4194466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moggast-Easter-deco-P4194441.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Betzenstein-1120251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baunach-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-MemmelsdorferstrasseP2228143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Moosstraße-P2177838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-MemmelsdorferstrasseP2228149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pegnitz-easter-fountain-1120287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leidingshof-Easter fountain-P4194491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! China-Schanghai-Jade Buddha-Temple-5176573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Caterpillar D6N-P3209724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Komatsu 61PX-P3209723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trainmeusel-Easter fountain-P4194417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birkenreuth-Easter fountain-P4194394.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birkenreuth-Easter fountain-P4194402hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolmsdorf-Easter fountain-4265137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birkenreuth-Easter fountain-P4194405hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trainmeusel-Easter fountain-P4194415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birkenreuth P4194397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birkenreuth P4194397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birkenreuth P4194398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birkenreuth P4194395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poxstall-Easter fountain-P4184356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trainmeusel-easter-fountain-4194424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hollfeld-fountain-P4164138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Königsfeld-fountain-P4164163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laibarös-fountain-P4164166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiefenellern-fountain-P4164179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altendorf-fountain-P4184210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-fountain-P4184329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallerndorf-fountain-P4184279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeiler-Osterbrunnen-3280138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeiler-Osterbrunnen-3280393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeiler-Osterbrunnen-3280389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buckenreuth-easter-fountainP4194429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muggendorf-easter-fountain-1030259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:55, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muggendorf-easter-fountain-1030258.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbrunn-easter-fountain-P1050851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbrunn-easter-fountain-1120680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pegnitz-easter-fountain-1120276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality Ram-Man 01:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürrbrunn-easter-fountain-P4164105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiefenstürmig-easter-fountain-P4164098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sassendorf-easter-fountain-P4123882 Oberfranken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birkach-easter-fountain-P4123790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:09, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medlitz-easter-fountain-P4123764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moggast-easter-deco-churchP4194438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's too dark. Please add more light. --Halavar 12:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC) Comment Fixed. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 17:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)  Support Now ok and QI in my eyes. --Milseburg 18:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf-easter-fountain-P4123675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-easter-fountain-P412367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühlendorf-easter-fountain-P4062889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steppach-easter-fountain-P4032513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image needs perspective correction. --XRay 07:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC) Done Tried my best. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 12:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. --XRay 15:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hollfeld-easter-fountain-1260061PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hollfeld-easter-fountain--1260045PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buckenreuth P4194432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pettstadt-easter-fountain-1200005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muggendorf-easter-fountain-1030264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birkach-easter-fountain--P4032482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steppach-easter-fountain-P4032503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vorr-easter-fountain-P4032527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image needs perspective correction. --XRay 07:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC) Done Tanks for reviewing--Ermell 12:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, I think you should check the image again. Please see my note. --XRay 15:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC) Done You were right.--Ermell 07:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)  Support :-) IMO OK now. --XRay 07:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hollfeld-easter-fountain-1260057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NiedermirsbergEaster fountain-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienkapelle-Priesendorf-3270032hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Aegidius-Kirchaich-organ-3270088hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Aegidius-Kirchaich-3270109hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Aegidius-Kirchaich-3270083hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Laurentius-Oberbrunn-3068693hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Aegidius-Kirchaich-3270093hdrPSPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Caterpillar 320E-P3209728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Hitachi Zaxis 210-P3209729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Hitachi Zaxis 225-P3209730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sachsendorf-easter-fountain-P4164131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenstadt-easter-fountainP4164116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 06:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwürbitz-easter-fountain-1010281PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuses am Main-easter-fountain-1010277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainroth-easter-fountain-1010255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zapfendorf-ICE-Kubota-excavators-Baustelle-3068723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 13:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zapfendorf-ICE-Baustelle-3068712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zapfendorf-ICE-Baustelle-3068709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-station-P3209770.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Bartholomäus-Priesendorf-3270048hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Bartholomäus-Priesendorf-3270058hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

QI File:2012-07-17 - Bayerischer Landtag - Plenarsaal - 6920.jpg

• File:2012-07-17 - Bayerischer Landtag - Plenarsaal - 6920.jpg

Was ist den deiner Meinung nach falsch an der Perspektive? Der Raum ist tatsächlich rundlich, siehe: Seite des Landtages sowie Seite 3 - Raum E (PDF). cu --ST ○ 08:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Die Vertikalen sollten aber senkrecht bleiben wie z.B. der Fensterrahmen. Der gesamte Raum neigt sich nach links.--Ermell (talk) 09:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Das stimmt allerdings. Ich werde es richten. cu --ST ○ 15:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Besser? --ST ○ 17:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasendorf-Easter- fountain-1010240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großgressingen-P1060172HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainleus-Easter- fountain-1010245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Bartholomäus-Priesendorf-3270063hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Aegidius-Kirchaich-3270078hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-easter-fountain-P4123738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grossbirkach-Easter-fountain-P1060178HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilmenau-Easter- fountain-P1060180HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halavar 09:37, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilmenau-Easter fountain-P1060182HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlüsselfeld-Easter fountain-P1060191PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halavar 09:37, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sambach-Easter- fountain-P1060201HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Archi38 13:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weidnitz-easter fountain-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 23:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-station-P3209762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Aegidius-Kirchaich-3270118hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zapfendorf-ICE-Baustelle-3068713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trainmeusel-Easter fountain-1200021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-Easter fountain-1120619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 23:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebrach-Easter fountain-P1060117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A beautiful composition, a very sharp detailed photo but I would make the sky much more brighter --Michielverbeek 15:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volkswagen-VW-1200-084554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halavar 21:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari-Monaco-4071026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari-Monaco-4071021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari-Monaco-4071029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari-Monaco-4071008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volvo Amazon-P1150330PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:52, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterleiterbach-Wegmarter-3068700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the main object --Michielverbeek 14:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterleiterbach-Wegmarter-3068699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monaco-Rolls-Royce-4071031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien 1040168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice moment, good quality, but tight crop at the antenna at the top too tight for my personal taste. --Tuxyso 19:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque for Kunigunda Löffler-Ruine-Rauheneck-270216-2278325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine-Rauheneck-270216-2278358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 19:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine-Rauheneck-270216-2278367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice framing, probably f8 had been better due to shallow depth of field. --Tuxyso 19:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Aegidius-Kirchaich-3270099hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Aegidius-Kirchaich-3270068hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Aegidius-Kirchaich-3270119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:42, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari-Monaco-4070991PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buch-Easter-fountain-P1060177HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:34, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Geisfelder-Strasse-P2137402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:04, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ~Good quality --Halavar 08:59, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:59, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:04, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar-XJ-Nizza-4070912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trainmeusel-Easter- fountain-1200017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Furchtbarer Kitsch ;-) --Moroder 07:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139427.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:05, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aixam-Crossline-Nizza-4070913.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Ram-Man 23:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinsäule-Krassach-P4202057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinsäule-Krassach-P4202063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 07:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinsäule-Krassach-P4202064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinsäule-Rothmannstal-P4202083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinsäule-Rothmannstal-P4202085PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Ein Tipp..

lb R. wenn es zu Diskussionen kommt bei QI ist es inzwischen üblich geworden, dass man den "Kontrahenten" anpingt, wenn man zB wie hier eine gewünschte Änderung durchgeführt hat. Es ist leider so, dass sich nicht jeder seine Tätigkeiten im Review bzw. im Consensual review automatisch nacharbeitet, jeder wartet auf den {{ping|xxxx}}. Es ist durchaus eine Zeitersparnis, wenn man sich darauf verlassen kann, dass man sowieso angepingt wird. Du wirst selbst feststellen können, dass als Antwort auf Comments das die übliche Vorgangsweise ist. Bilder, welche keinen ping nach einem Comment haben, die bleiben oft tagelang hängen! Es wird auch als Unhöflichkeit gesehen, wenn ein Dritter sich deren annimmt. Lg aus Wien --Hubertl 13:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp Hubertl. Ich lerne gerne.--Ermell (talk) 08:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Moosstraße-P2177848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Moosstraße-P2177789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Geisfelder-Strasse-P2137410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Geisfelder-Strasse-P2137407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche-Rothmannstal-P4202079PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neideck-Cave-1260332-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterleiterbach-Wegmarter-3068698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Thermes de Cimiez-4060734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 13:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Thermes de Cimiez-4060733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI, though there is noise --A.Savin 15:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Matisse-Museum-4060732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Ceneleum-4060730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Much noise in the air, but nice shoot.--Famberhorst 15:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthaus-Forelle-Weihersmühle-P4202056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Harsh light, but ok. --Hubertl 10:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altendorf-Kapelle-P4202077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky is very dark, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:51, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesentfels-Burg-1250093PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:41, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesentfels-Burg-1240579efsPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P3209755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Hallo Ermell,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)