User talk:Electron/Archive 2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska zaprasza Cię na warsztaty fotograficzne, które odbędą się w Łodzi, 1-3 maja 2010. Twój wkład do Wikimedia Commons wskazuje, że możesz wiele skorzystać z udziału w warsztatach i podzielić się swoim doświadczeniem fotograficznym z innymi. Warsztaty są skierowane do:

  • osób już wgrywających mniejsze czy większe ilości zdjęć do Wikimedia

Commons - niezależnie od ich jakości

  • fototoamatorów - nie związanych dotąd z projektami Wikimedia
  • zawodowych fotografów - w charakterze doradców i wykładowców

Nie ma znaczenia jaki typ fotografii preferujesz - w Wikimedia Commons jest miejsce zarówno dla portrecistów, dokumentalistów, jak i fotografów pejzażu miejskiego i przyrody. Wikiwarsztaty będą miały charakter kameralny (max. 40-50 osób) i trwały przez weekend 1-3 maja 2010 <sobota-poniedziałek>, Zajęcia będą się odbywały w Łódzkim Domu Kultury oraz w plenerze. Organizatorzy zapewniają w ramach opłaty konferencyjnej (50 zł od osoby) - nocleg( PTSM na ul. Zamenhoffa), wyżywienie (obiady) i bezpłatny dostęp do Internetu w trakcie obrad.

E-mail: wikifoto@wikimedia.pl WWW: http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiwarsztaty_fotograficzne Tel: 0-22 219 56 94 Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska, ul. Tuwima 95, p. 15, Łódź.

Zobacz też: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/pl/6/66/Zaproszenie_wiki_foto_2010.pdf

Pozdrowienia,

Organizatorzy Warsztatów Wikifoto 2010

File:Bertall ill La Petite Fille et les allumettes.png[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Clone_troopers_in_the_spotlight.jpg[edit]

File:Clone_troopers_in_the_spotlight.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

217.198.216.54 22:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jakub Szela[edit]

W książce jest wiele ilustracji Franciszka Pareckiego, odbijanych -UWAGA!- z oryginalnych klocków drzeworytniczych. Chętnie bym je zeskanował, ale Parecki zmarł mniej niż 70 lat temu, i boję się, że złosliwy administrator to wyłapie. Co robić? Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 05:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Czerwony Sztandar" był wydawany we Lwowie 1939-1941. Po roku 1944 został przeniesiony do Wilna, wychodził chyba do 1990. Drzeworyty mogę zeskanować i przesłać ci mailem do późniejszego wykorzystania. Na oberpolicmajstra M jest sposób: zawiesić na angielskiej albo niemieckiej Wiki, a potem cichutko przenieść do Commons. Pozdrowionka Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 13:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andersen - Chanvre.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

znak graficzny DSE[edit]

Witaj... Zdecydowanie jest to znak państwowy. Oni utworzyli przecież swoje państwo - republikę, swój komunistyczny "Rząd z Gór", jak nazywała go ludność, dowódca DSE Marcos Wafiadis był jego premierem i ministrem obrony. Jest więc to znak państwowy, bez watpliwości. Znak państwa podziemnego, to przecież także znak państwowy. Natomiast jest to też prosty symbol geometryczny. Czyli "Δ", jak Republika, wpisane w pomocniczy symbol greckich sił zbrojnych (coś jak gdyby wpisać je w polską, biało-czerwoną szachownicę). Pozdrawiam i dzięki za pomoc :) --Dimkoa (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2010 (UTC) Chwileczkę, przecież to jest po prostu znak sił zbrojnych (symbol państwowy). I niema wobec tego znaczenia prosty, czy skomplikowany. Jeśli wolno zaprezentować czerwoną gwiazdę, znak RAF, czy szachownicę, wolno i to. Jeśli nie wolno, to żadnego z nich.--Dimkoa (talk) 05:40, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wskazałem na tę okoliczność w opisie rysunku, toteż myślę, chyba można usunąć zastrzeżenie, że znaczek może stanowić trademark ? --Dimkoa (talk) 06:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... dość mądrze to wywiodłeś. Niewątpliwie w Grecji sporo jest osób, gotowych ten znak traktować jak co najmniej szubienicę, oprawioną w sierp i młot :) Niech więc "dodatkowe zabezpieczenie" pozostaje, ja zaś usunę drażniące nawet niektóre własne uwagi... --Dimkoa (talk) 18:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trejdmark[edit]

Siem robi szefunciu. Masur (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC) ps. wlasciwie juzem siem zrobilo :)[reply]


File:You_are_here_-_metro_in_Paris.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:You_are_here_-_metro_in_Paris.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

–Tryphon☂ 21:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

pl-wiki, ale jak?[edit]

Myśl przednia, ale jak to zrobić? Toolserver Magnusa defaultowo kieruje na commons, a tam czyhają już krwawe zbiry. Ściągnąć na swój dysk, to plik straci flickr-dziewiczość. Commons helper tez przenosi tylko w stronę commons. Ale i tak dzięki za życzliwość. Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 16:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:...sadness.jpg[edit]

File:...sadness.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--DieBuche (talk) 17:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Time to let (her) go!.jpg[edit]

File:Time to let (her) go!.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--DieBuche (talk) 18:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As well as Sadness 2, Sadness 3 and Sadness.--DieBuche (talk) 18:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr reviewer[edit]

Hello Electron, and thank you for your application to be a flickr reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. Congratulations! Please see Commons:Flickr images if you haven't done so already, and the backlogs at Category:Flickr images needing human review and Category:Flickr review needed. A helpful script for easy-tagging flickr images is at importScript('User:Patstuart/Flickrreview.js'); (which you can add to your monobook.js), and you can add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your work on Commons! :) --Justass (talk) 11:37, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

flickr[edit]

Please don't recompress jpgs from flickr before you upload them here (like this File:Summer's boredom.jpg). This will make the Reviewbot unable to confirm the image as well as reducing the quality considerably--DieBuche (talk) 08:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:I am blue.jpg[edit]

File:I am blue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

← Körnerbrötchen » ✉ 07:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for your flickr uploads[edit]

Hello Electron!

I have noticed that you use the category proposalsof the flickr upload tool. This is problematic in many cases because this tool places tons of more or less expedient categories. PLEASE categorise your uploads properly. Thanks in advance for supporting the categorisation on Commons! Regards, High Contrast (talk) 09:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship[edit]

Thanks for voting--DieBuche (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is a woman? And what is a girl?[edit]

Hello Electron!

Here you can read what is defined as a girl and what is defined as a woman. I have corrected your edits here. Please check similar edits of you and correct them. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 14:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Lovin'_Scoopful_Sharing_Smiles.jpg[edit]

File:Lovin'_Scoopful_Sharing_Smiles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 02:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sharing_Smiles.jpg[edit]

File:Sharing_Smiles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 02:23, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smile_at_night.jpg[edit]

File:Smile_at_night.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 15:57, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michel_Albert.jpg[edit]

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:Michel_Albert.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ italiano ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ українська ∙ svenska ∙ sicilianu ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 12:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:I_was_here_in_Singapore.jpg[edit]

File:I_was_here_in_Singapore.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Cheers, JackLee –talk– 09:28, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:I_was_here_in_Singapore_2.jpg[edit]

File:I_was_here_in_Singapore_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Cheers, JackLee –talk– 09:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Keeping_good_company.jpg[edit]

File:Keeping_good_company.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

sугсго 09:33, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recat[edit]

Mógłyś wytłumaczyć dlaczego zmieniłeś kategorię w tej edycji na związaną ze Szczecinem? Szczecin nie ma przecież Rynku (głównego). JDavid (talk) 15:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Radzę nie zgadywać gdzie co jest. Może ktoś kiedyś zorientuje się jakie to miasto i poda odpowiednią kategorię. Takie strzelanie by skategoryzować może okazać się bardzo szkodliwe. Pozdrawiam JDavid (talk) 19:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is a woman? And what is a girl?[edit]

Hello Electron!

Here you can read what is defined as a girl and what is defined as a woman. I have corrected your edits here. Please check similar edits of you and correct them. Kind Regards, High Contrast (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, continue the discussion where it started, this has lots of advantages. Well, if you do not know if the person is 18 or not,m the choose Category:Adolescent girls, that's even more likely than Category:Girls. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 12:28, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I've change the category... Electron <Talk?> 12:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr review notice[edit]

Hello Electron. You are receiving this message because you have recently or regularly participate in Flickr review requests. A proposal to move Commons talk:Flickr files/reviewers to Commons:License review/requests was made and no objections were raised and thus transferred. Please watchlist this new page for further requests. Commons talk:Flickr files/reviewers will continue to display for a period of time but new requests will not be raised on your watchlist. Thank you, ZooFari 16:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Girl with a nice smile.jpg[edit]

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:Girl with a nice smile.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ italiano ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ українська ∙ svenska ∙ sicilianu ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 21:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that this file comes from http://www.snorgtees.com/ . I serched all 22 pages from http://www.snorgtees.com/snorg_photos.php and there is no such photo. The author's statement "i've developed a crush on the snorgtees girl www.snorgtees.com" means only that author is in love in girl that wears T-shirts comes from this site. If you searched other photos of chris.corwin you would find that there is more photos with this girl and with the author's himself wering such T-shirts... Electron <Talk?> 07:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started, as this makes conversations easier to follow. I am watching this page, so I will see responses made here.
The reason you can't find that photo on their site is that the product has been removed. You'll notice that the photo has the same border and dimensions as the other product photos on the site, and that the same girl models for many of their other products. The photos of the Flickr user have different dimensions, no border, and he does not model on the official site. the snorgtees girl has a nice smile from the same photostream is nicked from http://www.snorgtees.com/shirt.php?products_id=212. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Now I see. So the photo should be deleted. Thanks for explanation. Electron <Talk?> 07:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. :) —LX (talk, contribs) 07:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deputy Commissioner.png[edit]

Thanks for restoring the no-license template; I only removed it by accident. Nyttend (talk) 01:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Colours_of_Happiness.jpg[edit]

File:Colours_of_Happiness.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Blurpeace 01:02, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Put_a_smile_on_your_face.jpg[edit]

File:Put_a_smile_on_your_face.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tiptoety talk 23:11, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Funny_head.jpg[edit]

File:Funny_head.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

–Tryphon☂ 09:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interesting_Urinal.jpg[edit]

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:Interesting_Urinal.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ italiano ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ українська ∙ svenska ∙ sicilianu ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 22:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Female Stormtroopers!.jpg[edit]

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:Female Stormtroopers!.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ italiano ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ українська ∙ svenska ∙ sicilianu ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 22:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DR[edit]

Can you help out MGA73 since you marked the image I am sure they are not free too. But maybe you can give the uploader a brief explanation...as he seems to be unclear about copyright. Best wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pathare_Prabhu_man_(19th_century).png[edit]

I thank you for your support for the two pictures I have uploaded. They are required to complete the article, Pathare Prabhu. I have sent my email ID on the mail. Pathare Prabhu (talk) 07:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Electron,
per this it seems at least one of the redirects speedy-tagged by you for "misleading name of redirect" was still in use. Before speedy-tagging a redir, please check that it is no longer in use on Commons or globally. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PL Józef Ignacy Kraszewski-Matka królów tom I 001.jpg.jpg[edit]

Witam. Cos ci sie omsknelo chyba przy zmianie nazwy. Moglbys przywrocic rozszerzenie ".jpeg" (zamiast obecnego ".jpg.jpg" ? Ankry (talk) 11:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Istotnego - nie. Ale jak jedna strona ma inny standard nazewnictwa niż pozostałe, to się wprowadza zamieszanie. A prościej zmienić jedną, niż 300. Ankry (talk) 19:32, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Urinal_in_the_Bangkok_airport.jpg[edit]

File:Urinal_in_the_Bangkok_airport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dereckson (talk) 13:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm sorry to bother you with this matter, as you find copyright paranoia disruptive. --Dereckson (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
At least, that allowed the {{FoP-Thailand}} creation. --Dereckson (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikki Cox.jpg[edit]

Hello. I reverted your edit [1]. She looks grown up in the photo, and from birth date & date of photo confirms she was in her 20s. Infrogmation (talk) 16:44, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glass 16 - Sermon on the mount.jpg[edit]

Thanks for renaming these for me so quickly! Sorry for the trouble.Jane023 (talk) 21:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rueppell's Glossy-starling in Tanzania 2952 Nevit.jpg[edit]

Hi, thank you for renaming File:Rueppell's Glossy-starling in Tanzania 2952 Nevit.jpg. Please retain nevit and number suffix when renaming my files. I use both parameters when searching for a specific file of me on commons. i.e. I have uploaded about 120 photographs of species Lamprotornis superbus. I have uploaded more than 15000 files and without those tags management becomes a frustration for me. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 10:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 11:19, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am trying my best :) :)

--Nevit Dilmen (talk) 11:42, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File renaming[edit]

I don't think this was a valid rename reason. The old name “Gravis UltraSound PNP.jpg” was neither wrong nor misleading. It is a Gravis UltraSound PNP. The user should have edited the description. The “Pro” is still missing there. And why Gravis UltraSound PnP Pro V1.0.jpg? Why not “Gravis UltraSound PnP Pro Version 1.0.jpg”? --TMg 09:04, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I fulfiled only the user request and his explanation sounds resonable. I am not an expert of sound cards. So what do you propose to fix the problem? I can change the name seconed time if you have a better name for this file. There is no problem... Please put an answer on my commons talk page because I am here only a guest. Regards Electron 11:50, 10. Sep. 2010 (CEST)
There is no need to do anything. That's what I said: there never was a need to do anything. You don't need to be an expert to look at the category and to see the reason was just to make the filename look better. Besides, I have the filemover right too. And please put your answer under the question. --TMg 10:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks for explanation but now there is no big problem to change the name around wiki projects because it is usualy made automaticaly by CommonsDelinker. Of corse we should follow with commons principles & recommendations but they were stated much time ago when there were no automatic tools... Electron  <Talk?> 10:11, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No tool can fix external links pointing to the file. Cool URIs don't change. If somebody decides to delete the redirect, what then? Causing trouble for a title almost nobody will ever see. --TMg 04:12, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I understend your point of view but I left the redirect -> File:Gravis UltraSound PNP.jpg. Btw. If the redirect be deleted there is a trace -> a description usually left with a note where now is the file... Also every admin can see into deleted files because on wikis there is no possibility to delete anything. After so colled "deletation" the file stayed only unvisible for a reglar user, not for admins. Electron  <Talk?> 23:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photography_is_in_my_heart.jpg[edit]

File:Photography_is_in_my_heart.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

–Tryphon☂ 14:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rename problem[edit]

Hello, both renames for the following file went wrong, could you please check it again? It should be File:Jaillot, Alexis-Hubert - Parties Des Archeveschés et Eslectorats De Mayence, De Treves; Du Palatinat et Eslectorat Du Rhein (...) (1696)-manipulated.jpg. File is presently at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jaillot,_Alexis-Hubert_-_Parties_Des_Archevesch%C3%A9s_et_Eslectorats_De_Mayence,_De_Treves;_Du_Palatinat_et_Eslectorat_Du_Rhein_(...)_(1696)-manipulated.jpg...)_(1696)-manipulated.jpg...)_(1696)-manipulated.jpg . Thank you, --Fhmann (talk) 11:53, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reuploaded the file under the proper name, maybe you could delete the wrongly named one. Thank you. --Fhmann (talk) 12:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ducati motorcycles[edit]

Ho svuotato le pagine Category:Ducati Twins - Category:Ducati 750 - Category:Ducati bevel-drive twins - Category:Gran Sport. É possibile cancellarle ? --Ligabo (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[I emptied the following pages: Category: Ducati Twins - Category: Ducati 750 - Category: Ducati bevel-drive twins - Category:Gran Sport. Can I cancel?]
Spiace anche a me di non parlare polacco. Grazie :-) --Ligabo (talk) 10:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[Przepraszam, że mnie nie znają języka polskiego. Dzięki :-)]

File:Hugo - Œuvres complètes, Impr. nat. etc.[edit]

Dziękuję (thanks, I suppose). Best regards. Piero (talk) 12:35, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:During_filming_The_Empire_Strikes_Back.jpg[edit]

File:During_filming_The_Empire_Strikes_Back.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 08:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Starwars photos[edit]

Hi Electron,
there seems to be a problem with your recent uploads of Starwars photos from Flickr. On Flickr and here it is claimed that these photos were shot in 2010, which is clearly impossible as these are obviously original scenes from the time the film was produced. Therefore, these are likely secondary photos of original photos shot some years ago by someone else and eventually shown in a Starwars museum or something like that. The question is, who shot the original photos. I recommend you to directly ask the Flickr user, where he shot these photos and, if my suspicion is true, who shot the original (old) photos. Otherwise we have to assume these are copyviolating derivatives. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Water_wheels_水車(すいしゃ).jpg[edit]

To samo i nie mam pojecia OCB. Moze skontaktuj sie z kims z Commons kto jest bardziej techniczny? Jakis en-admin, czy cos. Ja ci nie moge, bo to jakis myk jest, na ktorym sie nie znam. Masur (talk) 14:38, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bombardowanie Warszawy[edit]

Widziałem, że aktywnie brałeś udział w dyskusji na temat usunięcia tej fotki. Jeden admin, Belg zresztą, uznał że to się za długo ciągnie i pomimo tego, że większość głosów była "zostawić" to na chamego skasował. Odtworzyłem i wznowiłem dyskusję, proponuję, byś się ponownie włączył.
To jest moim zdaniem chore, kiedy na siłę interpretuje się zdjęcia wykonane przez pilotów, żołnierzy i te pe - na równi z dziełami sztuki, ale to już moja prywatna opinia. Poza wszystkim, to jest ewidentny przykład na anonymous-EU, a kolesie tylko dzielą włos na czworo (co skądinąd nazywane bywa chyba też po imieniu trollowaniem)... Julo (talk) 18:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Z tym przeniesieniem do pl:wiki w zasadzie masz rację, ale.... Ale tak się składa, że w ostatnim czasie lokalne zasoby graficzne z plwiki w całości przeniesione zostały do commons (i w ten sposób automatycznie oddane na pożarcie mało kumatym adminom z Belgii, Chin czy innego Zimbabwe). To był pomysł jednego z naszych wikipedystów, pracowicie przezeń przeprowadzony pomimo dużych kontrowersji i sprzeciwów.
    Dziś wznowiona została inicjatywa stworzenia specjalnej kategorii plików lokalnych, tylko w pl:wiki. Proponuję, byś zabrał głos w tej sprawie: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Kawiarenka/Og%C3%B3lne#Plwiki_uwolniona_od_plik.C3.B3w
    Pozdrawiam Julo (talk) 00:42, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please come[edit]

and join the discussion here. THENEWMONO (a real person) 23:28, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies - gardenology renames[edit]

I have only just seen the discussions - after seeing the MRR images awaiting re-name - please feel free to ask me to revert my edits if any of the above editors consider my renaming out of order -- SatuSuro (talk) 04:45, 27 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Electron/Archive_2010&oldid=47967917"