User talk:Carolus

Ik ben nie zo zot als die engelsen.Carolus 13:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{bad name|Category:correcte naam categorie}}

Global account[edit]

Hi Carolus! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hoogeerwaarde Kanunnik Vanhoutten 2009.jpg[edit]

Dag Carolus, verwijzend naar uw opmerking eerder op mijn OP, graag uw advies omtrent de naamgeving van deze file uploaded door U. Gezien het aantal personen en om verwarring te vermijden, stel ik voor ofwel de beschrijving te vervolledigen, ofwel de naam van de file te wijzigen en en passant de schrijfwijze te corrigeren. Lotje (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wat stel je concreet voor? Carolus (talk) 19:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weet U toevallig wie de derde "eminentie" is? Zo ja, zou ik zijn naam ook vermelden, dus: File.Koen Vanhoutte (L) met Robert Sarah (M) en (R).jpg Lotje (talk) 08:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

De man in kwestie is vicaris, maar zijn naam noch functie zijn in deze context niet relevant. En voor de duidelijkheid zijn dit geen eminenties, maar kanunniken maw Hoogeerwaarde. Ik ga niet al de foto's van kanunniken aanpassen, dat is niet zinvol, en ook niet mijn bedoeling van deze foto's. Carolus (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dan laten we het best voor wat het is. Toch bedankt voor de uitleg. Lotje (talk) 17:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a painting[edit]

(Sorry, I am bad in english) - Hello : you have download this painting File:Portrait_of_King_Louis_XIV_and_his_Brother,_Duc_D'Orleans.jpg, it is now multi-edited on web. Do you remember where you have found this painting in 2006 ? Have you some more information ? I am looking for the painter and the museum or collection and I find nothing by myself. Best Regards; - 77.151.31.155 20:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user can talk in France also, as far as I know :-) - --Richardkw (talk) (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It might have been an auction catalogue; don't remember, but probably is in a private collection. regards.Carolus (talk) 22:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Russian lace[edit]

Hi, I am Russian, I've seen Russian lace. This pictures should be in category "lace", 'cos their description in the museum exhibition contains Russian word "кружево" (lace). I belive the museum workers who created the description, printed it on the paper and added it under the glass near the object, knows better than you if there is lace in this object or not. Or you know better? --Shakko (talk) 14:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mödling[edit]

Hallo Carolus, ich nehme an dass du deutsch verstehst, dann lese aber bitte auch die Beschreibung, bevor du Kategorien änderst. Niederösterreihc ist nunmal nicht in Germany ;-) --gruß K@rl (talk) 08:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:SANGUIS BRUGENSIS14 08.JPG[edit]

Dag Carolus, weet u toevallig de naam van deze kanunnik? Lotje (talk) 14:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Carolus (talk) 15:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coton_velvet[edit]

Category:Coton_velvet has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 06:38, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use the images of Mechlin and Valenciennes lace[edit]

Hi Carolus I am trying to contact a photographer who has taken the photo's of Mechlin and Valenciennes lace which was uploaded to Wikipedia.

I would like to use the image in an educational textile text book and am requesting permission to do so - although the licence has said the image can be used my publisher is insisting that I have specific written permission from the owner. I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Regards Bev Ashford

That is very kind. Can u tell which images you would like to use, so i can give more information. KR. Carolus (talk) 20:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

these are two links to the images I would like to include https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Antique_Lawn_007.JPG and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Carolus_-Private_Collection_-_Valenciennes.jpg

On the text page the images are accredited with your name and the link to the page on Wikipedia. Further accreditation is in the accreditation section listed under the wiki licence.

Many thanks for your time, it is much appreciated. Bev's Book (talk) 14:11, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Bev's Book[reply]

Permission to Use Images[edit]

Hi Carolus

I requested some time ago your permission to use two of your photo's of lace, (valencienne and mechlin) but I am unsure whether you saw my further information.

Below are the links to the two images

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Antique_Lawn_007.JPG and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Carolus_-Private_Collection_-_Valenciennes.jpg

I would be grateful if you could get back to me regarding the use of the photo's for my textile text book

Many thanks Bev's Book (talk) 16:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Bev's book[reply]

I don't realy understand, written permission isn't required for wikipedia. you can use the images anyway, if you put my name somewhere. right?Carolus (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that the licences give permission but my publisher is requesting thst I have written permission from individual author's of uploaded images. if you could just clearly give me your permission to use all lace images that you own as above so I canmove forward with getting my book self-published I would truly appreciate it. huge thanks in anticipation Bev's Book (talk) 21:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Bev's Book[reply]

Order of the Garter[edit]

Order of the Garter has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Lobsterthermidor (talk) 12:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pulpit of St-John in the Béguinage[edit]

Hallo Carolus, kan jij het verband leggen tussen the pulpit came from a Dominican church in Mechelen and is attributed to Joseph Lambert Parant based on a design of Egide-Joseph Smeyers of Mechelen, Andries Jozef Smeyers, G.J. Smeyers en Gillis Smeyers ? Lotje (talk) 11:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ik begrijp je vraag niet zo goed, wat voor een verband zoek je? --Carolus (talk) 13:18, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of er meerdere "smeyers" waren en of ze verwant waren: Egide-Joseph Smeyers van Mechelen, Andries Jozef Smeyers, G.J. Smeyers, Gillis Smeyers. Lotje (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Queen Maria Hendrika.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Queen Maria Hendrika.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Queen Maria Hendrika.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert I and Leopold III.jpg[edit]

File:Albert I and Leopold III.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 23:04, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:King Albert I of belgium.jpg[edit]

File:King Albert I of belgium.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:King Albert I, and Queen Elisabeth of Belgium -Pontificale Audiëntie.jpg[edit]

File:King Albert I, and Queen Elisabeth of Belgium -Pontificale Audiëntie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:CRUYBEECK 12.JPG[edit]

Hallo Carolus, vanwaar die filenaam? Kan je die aanpassen? Lotje 09:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Misschien kan er een People of Kruibeke worden aangemaakt? Lotje 09:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Dat portret hangt in Kruibeke, simpel. Ik kies dit doelbewust.--Carolus (talk) 18

26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

File renaming[edit]

@Carolus: kan je deze file hernoemen? Spelling: Godfried Danneels. Lotje 11:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Carolus: en deze ook Lotje 11:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:PiusVI-GustavIII.JPG[edit]

Hi Carolus, I see that you are reverting my changes. There are no chivalric robes in that picture, nor of the seraphim nor any other. Why do you revert my changes. .--Mkallgren 14:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altaar I.jpg[edit]

Hallo Carolus, waar heb je die foto genomen? Ik zou hem graag hernoemen. Lotje (talk) 14:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Authorization Request[edit]

Sir or Madame, I would ask: could you authorize me to publish for the 23th June your picture (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Heart#/media/File:S_CORDIS_IESU_SEVEREN-ENTE.jpg) on my International Catholic Page (https://www.facebook.com/antiateismoantiatheism/) ? Thank you very much Yours Sincerely

N.B. Could you reply me to email address achille93@live.it if you authorize me ? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.104.183.157 (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, please clearly mention my name and wiki. thank you.--Carolus (talk) 11:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Regina papa bianco.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Regina papa bianco.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Guanaco (talk) 14:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SJACOBVS SACR17 .JPG[edit]

Hallo Carolus, kan je de beschrijving bij de afbeelding verduidelijken en eventueel de naam van de file aanpassen (#2}}? Het komt nogal vaag over. Ik was op zoek naar een plaatje van Jan Van Cauwelaert en had gehoopt het hier te vinden. Lotje (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC) Dat is toch duidelijk Sanctvs Jacobus Sacrament 2017?? Wat van Cauwelaet hier te zoeken heeft, weet ik niet.[reply]

Cauwelaert vierde zijn honderdste verjaardag met een dankviering in de Sint-Laurentiuskerk in Antwerpen, voorgegaan door Antwerps bisschop Johan Bonny. Vandaar mijn vraag. Lotje (talk) 10:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sash of the Order of Leopold (Belgium)[edit]

an ordianry sash is not made of moire and had nothing to do with this type of folklore.
Oxford Learner's Dictionnary and Wikipedia disagrees with you self-made narrow definition of "sash". BrightRaven (talk) 12:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I think the naming of this category is perfectly correct. In English WP article, I read: "Grand Cordon ('Grand Cordon/Grootlint'), who wears the badge on a collar (chain) or on a sash on the right shoulder, plus the star on the left side of the chest". This category is intended for images showing the sash, not for people who have the rank of Grand Cordon (who can wear the sash or not on the images). "Sash" is unambiguous: it can only mean the object. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 12:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is simply wrong, the sash including the Little star at its end is name "Cordon", simpel.This If you want this be correct, this should be Sash of the Grand Cordon of the Order of Leopold. Anyway, at the moment the grand Cordon of the Count of Flanders is on display, if you gonna "invent" this ridiculous categories, you can forget i will add more images of the Order of Leopold. --Carolus (talk) 12:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any source for your statement? "Sash" is a common word in English language for this kind of object and it is in use in the corresponding English Wikipedia article. In English "Grand Cordon" means the person, not the object. The other ranks of the order do not have the right to wear a sash, so it is useless to have such a long name as "Sash of the Grand Cordon of the Order of Leopold". Please note that you cannot rename a category this way: if you want to propose a renaming, you need to use the {{Move}} template. So please stop your wrong renaming actions. BrightRaven (talk) 12:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not stop creating ridiculous and false categories for Belgian Articles, i will send you a formal warning.--Carolus (talk) 12:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I mentioned this case here: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. BrightRaven (talk) 12:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the only official source for this photograph of Albert I: [1]. Elizabeth J. O'Connor is said to be the photographer, and the photograph is from 1915. Please also read the Help pages of Commons, because it seems that you do not know how to make deletion request correctly (Commons:Deletion requests/Category:His Majesty, the King of Belgium (Elizabeth J. O'Connor)). BrightRaven (talk) 12:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A category named Category:Albert I of Belgium in 1909 cannot be for one particular picture: it is for all the pictures of Albert I taken in 1909. The description that you added is inappropriate. A category for a particular picture can be named as I did it: title of the photograph + name of the photographer. BrightRaven (talk) 13:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stop erasing this discussion? Commons is a collaboraive project. Can you try to be collaborative? BrightRaven (talk) 13:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool down please[edit]

Hoi Carolus,

Het lijkt erop dat de discussie wat oververhit. Misschien goed om een stapje terug te doen. Er lijkt verwarring te komen uit de manier waarop zaken vertaald worden. Is het een idee om een andere Vlaamse kenner van dit onderwerp te betrekken bij de discussie, in plaats van het alleen een heen-en-weer te laten zijn? Overigens zal hetzelfde spelen bij de Nederlandse onderwerpen met een grootlint. Effeietsanders (talk) 13:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, het punt is dat die dame gewoon weg een verkeerde bron gebruikt om een foute categorie te creeen? Dat kan toch niet zomaar?--Carolus (talk) 13:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Work on Swedish royal graves[edit]

I see you've been done a lot of work on Swedish royal grave categories, most of it good. Unfoirtunately, we lost some of the family ties now, when categories like "Gustav II Adolf Family Grave" were deleted as empty. Why didn't you leave those graves categorozed as such? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because i did not make sense; it is nhot a family grave, it were different tombs, not one grave.--Carolus (talk) 13:38, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It absolutely is a family grave with different caskets, all in the same family. Please be more knowledgeable before you make changes like that. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think you do not know the difference between a family cave/chapel and a family grave. A family grave is 1 big hole in the earth with different people burried on excactly the same spot, a chapel with different caskets is not a family grave. i know very well the differance between 1 family grave and a chapel with different family- caskets.--Carolus (talk) 21:54, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have taught English, which is my first language, for over 50 years.

You definitions are you own, but not real. A family grave is simply any gravesite where members of the same family are interred. You have gone against the very family grave names, such as Karolinska gravkoret (the Caroline Chapel - family grave for the wife, son, daughter-in-law and grandchildren of King Carl X Gustav) in the damaging changes you've made. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 07:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You do not read my point A Family Chapel or vault, is NOT the same as a family grave. The tombs you speak of are caskets inside a family Chapel, NOT inside a family grave. The Karolinska gravkoret taht you name is a Family Chapel, not a family grave.--Carolus (talk) 07:57, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In English, they are the same thing, i.e. a family chapel is a family grave. though a family grave may not be in a family chapel. And, as to my second point, Queen Richardice was never buried in Germany. Are you going to fix the damage you did there? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That can be changed, of course. It has no use to take English traditions for graves elswere.--Carolus (talk) 14:12, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Welcoming Christ by Elisabeth Frink[edit]

What was wrong with the original name? It included the essentials, i.e.,the what and the where. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't wrong, now it is correct confirm the rules of categoristion.--Carolus (talk) 19:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How are "not wrong" and "correct" different and which rule of categorisation did you have in mind? Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you always can add liverpool, if this is so important in her opus? --Carolus (talk) 23:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clarity[edit]

"Unclear discriptions"[2] is an invalid reason for deletion. Please read our deletion policy before filing future deletion requests. Also, please stop edit warring. — Jeff G. ツ 14:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belgian Royal collection Goya Salon I.jpg[edit]

File:Belgian Royal collection Goya Salon I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?[edit]

Hallo Carolus, nogal verwarrend als je 't mij vraagt. Lotje (talk) 06:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maria van Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen deze ook? Lotje (talk) 06:51, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ik zal die later eens een nieuwe naam geven, je zal een paar weken geduld moeten hebben. Maar... heb jij niets beter te doen op wikipedia? kan jij niet beter afbeeldingen uploaden dan dergelijk werk, dat niet prioritair is? --Carolus (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elisabeth of Belgium.jpg[edit]

File:Elisabeth of Belgium.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:46, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File rename[edit]

Hallo Carolus, ditmaal heb ik er met zorg op toegezien eerst naar te gaan wié deze file hier plaatste. . Concrete vraag/voorstel: File:Portret van Pierre-Louis Stillemans door Jozef Janssens de Varebeke.jpg, Zo is meteen ook de typo verdwenen, kanunnik i.p.v kannunik. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 13:37, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rename is aangevraagd. mvg--Carolus (talk) 16:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rename? Aan wie? Wanneer? ik vind nergens iets terug. Waarhom had je de Category:Jozef Janssens de Varebeke verwijderd?

File:CRUYBEECK 12.JPG moet ook worden hernoemd imo. Lotje (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, zal ik later dit weekend eens bekijken. Renames zijn niet prioritair imo.--Carolus (talk) 12:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ik had daar nog een opmerking/vraagje m.b.t. Category:Jozef Janssens de Varebeke. Volgens Jozef Janssens zou (ondermeer?) de dit werk van de hand van Jozef Janssens de Varebeke zijn. Geldt dit dan voor de ganse reeks? Zo ja, kan deze category imo aan Jozef Janssens de Varebeke worden toegevoegd. Graag je mening.

Lotje (talk) 13:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

geen idee, kan je best eens nakijken in een databank.--Carolus (talk) 09:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Carolus: , omdat je nog niet reageerde op mijn verzoek mbt File:CRUYBEECK 12.JPG hernoemd. Lotje (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Je bent weer bezig met zaken die niet van belang zijn, en fouten aan het verwerken. Stop toch eens met die onzin, en breng nieuwe afbeeldingen bij, jij bent toch slecht bezig hoor. zo jammer.--Carolus (talk) 17:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louvreantiquaires.JPG[edit]

Date: eergisteren, bedoel je 26 augustus? Lotje (talk) 09:20, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hier en hier en hier ook? Lotje (talk) 09:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grafmonument Jan van Polanen I[edit]

Hallo Carolus, volgens Jan II van Polanen zou dit niet de zerk zijn van Jan van Polanen I. Wat doet men in zo'n geval? Lotje (talk) 14:23, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

geen idee, de inhoud van Category:Tombs inside the Grote or Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekerk (Breda) is gewoonweg slecht geordend en een rommel.--Carolus (talk) 20:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC) Overigens volg ik de vermakelijkheden op WIKI.NL Het is een zege voor allen dan die meneer/ mevrouw Moira eens ter orde is geroepen![reply]

Wil je eens zien of dit correct is? Anders hoor ik het graag. Lotje (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ziet er een goede keuze uit.--Carolus (talk) 20:05, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Persoonlijk geef ik er de voorkeur aan alle categories naar het Engels te vertalen, kwestie van het voor iedereen overzichtelijk te houden. Maar dat laat ik graag aan jou over.

Lotje (talk) 03:51, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dito. Ik probeer via nieuwe categorieën elke onregelmatigheid te vermijden.--Carolus (talk) 07:11, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Knights of Columbus[edit]

Can you explain this edit? How is it a double cat? - Jmabel ! talk 22:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queen Marie-Louise of Belgium.jpg[edit]

Hi, do not empty information fields and do not remove the license. If you think the information or license should be corrected, feel free to do so. But do not simply remove them. If you think there is a copyright problem, nominate for deletion instead. Jcb (talk) 17:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not own work and not dated 2016-11-19.Smiley.toerist (talk) 13:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:18de eeuw bischopsportret.JPG[edit]

@Carolus: het is me bekend dat je het op je heupen krijgt wanneer iemand filenames wijzigt, maar in dit specifieke geval staat er een typo in stel ik voor de file te hernoemen of misschien zelfs te nomineren voor verwijdering gezien dit exemplaar. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

idem dito :-), en als je 't mij vraagt: je doet dit opzettelijk. Lotje (talk) 13:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ik vraag je niets, tenzij, blijf van een ander zijn bijdragen af, dan vermijd je boze reacties. Pech voor je, als ge u stoort aan tikfouten.--Carolus (talk) 16:11, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category rename[edit]

Hi, I've seen you've been renaming commons categories like Category:Don Bosco Family. Keep in mind that if you do not change them also in Wikidata, they get disconnected from their wikipedia categories: d:Special:diff/870996048. Thanks in advance, Paucabot (talk) 10:40, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Station Mechelen[edit]

De aanmaak van de category:History of Mechelen train station is ongelukkig. Het nieuwe gebouw valt al bij definitie niet onder geschiedenis. Bij herbouw van stations splits men deze in oud en nieuw. Voorbeelden: Category:Antwerp Central Station, Category:Leiden Central station, Category:Brugge train station en Category:Liège-Guillemins train station. Vermits voorlopig alleen een nieuw perron wordt gebouwd is er nog geen sprake van een (old) station. Gent Sint-Pieters en Brugge station zijn ook verbouwingen en zullen straks een spilsing nodig hebben. Ik heb voorlopig wat 'geschiedenis' beelden in 'history' geplaatst.Smiley.toerist (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2019 (UTC) Jeetje, wat een domme opmerking. Sorry hoor. Elk gebouw heeft een geschiedenis, zelfs als het in aanbouw is. Een nieuw gebouw is morgen geschiedenis. Er wordt overigens niets her-bouwt, waar je dat vandaan haalt is ook maar onzin. Het gebouw wordt gewoon gemoderniseerd, maar zal nog altijd Station van Mechelen als naam hebben. Er zal nooit een Old station bestaan, gewoon hetzelfde gebouw.--Carolus (talk) 16:14, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Carolus,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Carolus,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:GRAF OVL EPITAPH-d'HANE HALBERCH.jpg[edit]

Hallo Carolus, ik liep me af te vragen of Philip Marie Blommaert, De Saint Genois Baron, Eugène Herry iets van doen heeft met Philip Blommaert. En zo ja, denk je dat een Category:Works by Philip Blommaert aangewezen is om deze afbeeldingen in onder te brengen? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 11:28, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wat is zijn link met de familie d'Hane Steenhuyse?--Carolus (talk) 13:00, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Geen enkele dacht ik, maar hij zal er waarschijnlijk over geschreven hebben. Lotje (talk) 14:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Als dat de enige link is, zie ik niet waarom alles te verbinden? groeten,--Carolus (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Waarom ben jij altijd zo kort aangebonden? Lotje (talk) 15:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

wat bedoel je?--Carolus (talk) 21:31, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zo kort, alsof je niet graag antwoordt., no frills. :-) Lotje (talk) 04:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request: heraldica[edit]

I'm a little bit busy and besides I have had copyright problems with some official emblems, due the websites copyright conditions, in spite of they were not copies of the originals. Could you send the the title or links of the symbols. Thanks. --Heralder (talk) 20:48, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a private request of an 17th century person. Can i send you in private?--Carolus (talk) 22:15, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage[edit]

Hallo Carolus, zonet zag ik op je userpage een afbeelding met de tekst : ACU PINTVRA en ik vroeg me af wat de bedoeling hiervan is. Ik meende dat dit Acupictura was. :-) Je maakt me nieuwsgierig. Lotje (talk) 11:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC) Zoe hiervoor Acupictor => naaldschilder of borduurder.--Carolus (talk) 20:47, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt Carolus. Heb je er enig idee van in welke category ik deze afbeelding kan onderbrengen? :-) Thanks. Lotje (talk) 17:10, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dat is het borduren van polychrome zijde. opgelost.--Carolus (talk) 23:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Napoleon Bonaparte.jpg[edit]

File:Napoleon Bonaparte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

LoganTheWatermelon (talk) 18:12, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Catégories[edit]

Bonsoir,

Je veux bien vous faire des dessins que vous avez tout à fait le droit de catégoriser comme il vous plait, mais veuillez cesser de retirer les catégories que je place avec juste raison pour permettre l'identification des armoiries. En quoi le fait d'indiquer sur ces armoiries la présence d'un ours de sable et de trois glands vous pose problème ?

Je ne vais pas me lancer dans une guerre d'édition avec vous, j'ai d'autres chats à fouetter, mais je vous prie de croire que ce n'est pas la peine de venir me trouver pour faire quoi ce soit pour vous. Je commence à en avoir ras le bol de perdre du temps avec vous.

Merci de bien vouloir vous occuper de vos affaires et de ficher la paix à mon travail que j'ai encore le droit de catégoriser comme bon me semble, d'autant que vous n'avez aucune proposition de meilleure qualité à offrir.

A bon entendeur...

Jpgibert (talk) 22:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Refused: Heraldics are catgorised by the category, just like all. I will revert, to keep the current standards and avoid over categorisation of images. Besides, it is clear you hate armorials...I think you are un aware, that if you hit the ball, it might come just back. please, continue your work. --Carolus (talk) 22:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monseigneur Luysterman.JPG[edit]

Note that I have added this image to the dicussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mgr Luc Van Looy.jpg. GMG ^talk 17:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Armes_de_Muyser_Lantwyck.jpg[edit]

Hi, it seems that you haven't completed this request: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Armes_de_Muyser_Lantwyck.jpg, as well as many others. Is better, in such cases, to group all the files in an unique deletion request. Cheers --Ruthven (msg) 08:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this notice, i didn't know. Keep safe.--Carolus (talk) 09:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mass deletion nominations[edit]

Please use VisualFileChange tool for these. Sealle (talk) 06:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See comment higher, sorry. I did as was asked of me. No time to clean up. Keep safe, --Carolus (talk) 07:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please activate Help:Gadget-QuickDelete by clicking here and following the instructions. It makes "Nominate for deletion" pop up in the left sidebar under ”Tools". If you nominate pages for deletion using that tool everything is automatic. The uploader is notified, the deletion request is made and the deletion request is logged at Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/29. I replaced all your incomplete deletion requests by {{No permission since}} which makes the file getting deleted in seven days unless permission is sent to OTRS.Jonteemil (talk) 14:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry in advance for spamming you with notifications btw :).Jonteemil (talk) 14:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wand der bisschoppen.jpg[edit]

File:Wand der bisschoppen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heraldry Queen Louise of Belgium[edit]

Changed. Thanks --Heralder (talk) 01:55, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Kingdom of Belgium 1846.png It was an uncommon variant. Thanks for the image.--Heralder (talk) 02:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That one was in use at court, in early days, nice.--Carolus (talk) 02:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this one is with the Croix de Fer.--Carolus (talk) 02:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coppieters (familie)[edit]

Hallo Carolus, je weet dat ik getraumatiseerd ben wat betreft iets wijzigen waar jij mee bezig was... zou je de category willen aanpassen Category:Coppieters family. Thanks. Lotje (talk) 05:14, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Viaticum in art[edit]

Hallo Carolus, kan je eens kijken naar deze category? Misschien weet jij wel raad met deze imo dubbele linking. Thanks. Lotje (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weet je wat het viaticum is? Ik zie geen dubbele cat?--Carolus (talk) 15:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ja Carolus, dat staat hier, met afbeelding. :-) Lotje (talk) 16:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ofwel heb ik uw vraag weer niet begrepen, ofwel moet je uw vraag aan een theoloog stellen. Er bestaat zoiets als Eerste Communie, maar niet zoiets als Laatste Communie. Daarbij dient opgemerkt dat een communie onderdeel maakt van de euchartistie en een viaticum geen eucharistie is, het zijn 2 verschillende zaken. Is dit een antwoord op je vraag?--Carolus (talk) 17:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ach Carolus ...es liegen Welten zwischen uns. I humbly rest my case.

Lotje (talk) 04:48, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Advies nodig[edit]

Hallo Carolus, zonet heb ik aan St. Michael's Abbey, Antwerp de naam van Arnoldus (c. 1415) toegevoegd, voortgaande op Sint-Michielsabdij (Antwerpen) maar je advies zou toch heel welkom zijn. :-) Thanks. Lotje (talk) 16:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Johannes Chrysostomus vander Sterre[edit]

Hallo Carolus wat is belangrijker op artikel: dit of dit? Of zijn beide mogelijk? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 07:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beide zijn absoluut nodig, je moet dit in feodale context zien.--Carolus (talk) 10:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lotje, ik zie dat je weer een typfout hebt, het is Category:Joannes Chrysostomus vander Sterre en niet Category:Johannes Chrysostomus vander Sterre, ik had je al aangesproken hierover in context bij Category:Joannes Chrysostomus Teniers, kan je dit rechtzetten en nooit meer deze fout maken? Verder heb ik reeds Category:Macarius Simeomo en Category:Norbertus van Couwerven aangemaakt, mocht je in de verleiding komen, groet,--Carolus (talk) 10:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahum, Carolus een typfout zou ik dit nu niet bepaald noemen, maar enfin, als dit je gelukkig maakt. Bovendien verheugt het me dat je nog eens tegen me praat. :-) Lotje (talk) 12:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jamaar, jamaar Carolus, mijn bedoeling was nu net, iemand die (met aan zekerheid grenzende waarschijnlijkheid) verkeerdelijk op Johannes zou zoeken, hier terecht kwam en zodoende terechtkomt bij de category met de spelling die jij aanhoudt. En nou wil jij dit vlug verwijderen. Ik vind dit helemaal niet wijs. :-) Lotje (talk) 08:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misschien moesten we maar eens de mening van Andreas Philopater vragen. Lotje (talk) 08:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voor mij eenvoudig, alle abten zijn, zeker voor de Revolutie, met hun Latijnse kloosternaam. Dat was hun bekende naam bij publicaties enz...Wees daar aub consequent in. Wat ze op EN wiki doen, interesseert me niet. Er moeten hier geen doorverwijspagina's zijn, dat is hier op Commons zinloos, en ergerlijk. Mensen komen toch via een andere wiki op de juiste cat terecht. Liefst geen 500 varianten van namen zoals steden met belanchelijk veel doorverwijzingen. Einde discussie.--Carolus (talk) 12:58, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Museum Plantin-Moretus[edit]

Hallo Carolus, heb je toegang tot dit museum? Ik vroeg me af of dit correct is Buste van Apostel Simon en rechts de buste van de heilige Ambrosius. Zoals steeds, zou je advies welkom zijn. :-) Lotje (talk) 05:38, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

De rechtse buste is een paus. Ik heb die beelden al gezien, maar kan me niets concreets in detail herinneren. Het staat er vol van Beelden en schilderijen. Kijk hier eens? je vind er zeker antwoorden. --Carolus (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ik zal er niet verder over uitweiden, maar wat mij betreft zijn heel wat filenames niet correct. (wordt misschien nog vervolgd...) Vandaar mijn vraag. Ach, laat maar zitten. Lotje (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Burials inside Canterbury Cathedral[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you have moved all the files formerly in Category:Church monuments in Canterbury Cathedral to a new Category:Burials inside Canterbury Cathedral, stating "logic in hierarchy". Unfortunately not all the persons commemorated on these monuments were buried in the cathedral, and the objects are "monuments", not "burials". Your new category may well be appropriate in categorising biography pages on wikipedia, but I don't think it's suitable for categorising monuments, so I will be applying to have the former category re-instated. The standard category for these items accross the whole United Kingdom is "Category:Church monuments in (county/nation)", see Category:Church monuments in England by county. Lobsterthermidor (talk) 11:41, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not, see the perfect standard of Category:Burials at St. George’s Chapel, Windsor Castle.--Carolus (talk) 13:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Klasseren[edit]

Dag Carolus, mocht je niets omhanden hebben is dit misschien iets waar je de tanden kan inzetten. Ik zeg maar wat :-) Lotje (talk) 17:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dat ziet er zinvol uit! leuk seg.--Carolus (talk) 18:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lotje, kan jij deze man eens helpen? bedankt.--Carolus (talk) 18:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Waarmee moet ik PMRMaeyaert helpen? De uploader is Mr.Nostalgic en naar ik begrepen had zoeken we hier dus een expert

Lotje (talk) 13:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ik begrijp je reactie niet? PMaeyaert heeft nulp nodig, zoals hij antwoord op mijn vraag, zie daar?--Carolus (talk) 13:40, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Plaster replicas in Belgium[edit]

Category:Plaster replicas in Belgium is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 13:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thx--Carolus (talk) 18:19, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:OBBIT MGR Gent.jpg[edit]

File:OBBIT MGR Gent.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Lotje (talk) 14:15, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Carolus&curid=784032&diff=525880815&oldid=521924709[edit]

Hallo Carolus, je bedoelde zeker {{bad name|Category:correcte naam categorie}} ? Waar stuur je op aan? Lotje (talk) 14:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neen hoor, het is een sjabloon dat ik regelmatig gebruik, maar altijd vergeet hoe te schryven.--Carolus (talk) 14:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gustavus Josephus Waffelaert[edit]

Hallo Carolus, zou te achterhalen zijn of dit Gustavus Josephus Waffelaert. Zo ja, voeg ik de foto toe aan de category. Thanks. Lotje (talk) 16:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

doe maar.--Carolus (talk) 16:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kardinaal-Legaat[edit]

Hallo Carolus, zonet stootte ik op De Kardinaal-Legaat aan boord van de Batavier II en ik vroeg me af of te achterhalen wie deze Pauselijk legaat zou kunnen zijn. Het zou fijn zijn mocht je me daarbij behulpzaam kunnen zijn. Thanks. Lotje (talk) 11:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kijk eens hier?--Carolus (talk) 11:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

en hier... Lotje (talk) 12:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Op 't matje roepen :-)[edit]

Hallo Carolus, je had hier niets mee gedaan en ik vroeg me af of alles nu in orde is. Thanks. Lotje (talk) 12:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte Empress of Mexico - Order of Saint Charles.jpg[edit]

Hi, See here How do you know that this particular picture is from Hearst Castle?

You originally uploaded it here on 30 June 2006, replacing a different image in error.

There are detail differences; In one she has a jewel set on her shoulder, in the other she has an honoury decoration in the same location. One is an original? the other is a copy of the original. 13:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

@Broichmore: since Carolus is on my watchlist, I took a closer look at your comment and imo this is the painting. What do you suggest? Lotje (talk) 14:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: Just started a preliminary discussion on my User page. The picture File:Charlotte Empress of Mexico - Order of Saint Charles.jpg is a mystery. The best we can say is, that it's attributed to Winterhalter, everything about it, is unknown. Broichmore (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Hi Carolus. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 13:00, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert, Duke of Ursel[edit]

Hi. Do you have any specific reasons for reverting this file back to the version with lesser quality? The portrait is from 1920, so technically it's well over 80 years old and its copyright has probably expired by now. Regards. Keivan.f^Talk 20:57, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i made this picture, simple.--Carolus (talk) 22:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem here is that the full size (uncropped picture) should have been uploaded as a separate (new File) in the first place. Cropped pictures should have the same name as the parent, with the suffix cropped. They should also be referenced in the parent file. Full sized pictures should always be uploaded in preference to cropped IMO. Broichmore (talk) 14:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ANTW MAAGD van Zurenborg018.jpg[edit]

Hallo Carolus, ik weet dat je niet graag gestoord wordt, maar toch een rechtvoordevuistvraag: zou te achterhalen zijn of deze dame iets van doen heeft met deze Category:Ximenes of Aragon? De naam van Logenhaghen (Kasteel Leugenhage) en omdat Flemish History Buff al een tijdje niet meer actief was, ben ik zo vrij bij je aan te kloppen. Thanks. Lotje (talk) 11:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inderdaad; het wapenschild komt overeen, goed gezien !--Carolus (talk) 22:41, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt Carolus, ...en meteen stuit ik hierop ...He founded in 1601 Sint-Annagodshuis, in the bargiestraete in Antwerp... Natuurlijk vraag ik me af dit kan worden bevestigd. Er mogen geen foutieve zaken in Wikipedia voorkomen (!) Lotje (talk) 10:47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abdij van Voormezele[edit]

@Carolus: zou te achterhalen zijn of deze Alipsius Struye inderdaad de laatste abt was? Zijn geluk zal van korte duur geweest zijn (1735-1808). Er staat ...De abdij herstelde zich, maar werd in 1794, tijdens de Franse bezetting, opgeheven en verwoest... Hij was toen 60 . Ik voeg voor alle zekerheid de afbeelding in de category Voormezele. Grts. Lotje (talk) 12:09, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:SANGVIS BRVGENSIS AD 2019 10.jpg[edit]

Hallo Carolus, is te achterhalen waar Marc Steen staat? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 14:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ik ga dit niet zeggen, want dan wordt hij eruit geknipt, en dat is niet de bedoeling.--Carolus (talk) 17:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Een crop zou toch best goed kunnen zijn (om toe te voegen aan wikidata)? Lotje (talk) 11:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

V.l.n.r. #7 ???

Lotje (talk) 11:49, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ik zal kijken of ik geen betere foto heb, dan. is dit zo dringend?--Carolus (talk) 12:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dringend? Nee, maar ...stel niet uit tot morgen wat gij heden kunt bezorgen. Thanks! Lotje (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

	Merry Christmas Carolus
	Hi Carolus, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia, Lotje (talk) 05:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Religion_in_Belgium_by_type[edit]

Religion in Belgium by type has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 12:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nonnemanshoeve[edit]

Carolus, kun je me iets meer vertellen over de Nonnemanshoeve? Volgens mij is dat geen Kempische langsschuur (die in Nederland een Vlaamse schuur wordt genoemd), maar een dwarsschuur.Otto S. Knottnerus (talk) 13:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oei neen, geen idee. Pas maar aan, ik heb het zeker fout. bedankt.--Carolus (talk) 21:46, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correctie, het is een dwarsschuur uit het Land van Waas, verwant aan de Zeeuwse schuren. Maar de foto hoort dan niet thuis bij dit trefwoord.Otto S. Knottnerus (talk) 13:18, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:AD 2023 - Tereken Caem - Sander Wynants.jpg[edit]

Hallo Carolus, omdat ik de afbeelding graag toevoeg aan wikidata, vroeg ik me af of er een link bestaat tussen Lea Steppe en Sander Wijnants. Zo niet, kan misschien beter een crop gemaakt worden. Graag je advies. Grts. Lotje (talk) 04:37, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

zie hier. grts. Carolus (talk) 09:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:AD 2023 - Abbas Bornemensis - SUY.jpg[edit]

File:AD 2023 - Abbas Bornemensis - SUY.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Thieu1972 (talk) 20:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bisschoppelijk Paleis Brugge[edit]

Hallo Carolus, heb je weet van een artikel op de nl.wikipedia m.b.t. het Bisschoppelijk Paleis in Brugge? Ik vind nergens iets terug en ik dacht dat het misschien een andere naam kreeg. Thanks. Lotje (talk) 05:04, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:AD 2023 - portret van Gerardus Wassenberg - Abt van Bornem.jpg[edit]

File:AD 2023 - portret van Gerardus Wassenberg - Abt van Bornem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Thieu1972 (talk) 10:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move not helpful[edit]

Hello! Once again, this is actually a family grave, when described in the English language, and the category name reflected that before you moved it in 2017. Not helpful. Same goes for Magnus III. Best wishes, SergeWoodzing (talk) 07:37, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Hello! There were two Swedish queens by this name. One {the Elder) was a Danish princess who married a Swedish king. The other (the Younger) was her daughter who was queen in her own right. Please see talk on that page! SergeWoodzing (talk) 07:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

???[edit]

I declined your speedy request, please don't just revert a decline. The process is to use a deletion request. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please use the page there. don't be difficult, you are the only one to react like this. thx Carolus (talk) 12:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Burgemeester IV.JPG

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 08:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AD 2024 - BXL MRA - tas Jef Van de Wiele.jpg[edit]

Hallo Carolus, als je 't mij vraagt is dit een lederen aktentas. Ik zou de afbeelding onderbrengen in Category:Collections of the Royal Military Museum, Brussels en ook toevoegen aan Category:Briefcases .
De B.A.A.P.S. zal wel niets van doen hebben met deze B.A.A.P.S., maar ik vraag me wel af of dit misschien de aktetas van deze Van de Wiele zou kunnen zijn. Wat denk je? Cheers. Lotje (talk) 13:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]