User talk:Augustgeyler/Archive 2021

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-Bahn im Februar 2021 Zwischen Stötteritz und Anger-Corttendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schaufenster einer Kfz-Werkstatt für Oldtimer in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at QIC talk page

A discussion is being held here, over the reviewing process at QIC and the possibility of improving our Image Guidelines. As a regular contributor to the project, your opinion would be most welcome and valued. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I am already participating in that discussion. --Augustgeyler (talk) 12:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreaskirche in Trages im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreaskirche in Trages im Winter (hochformat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andrew's church in Trages near Leipzig.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Friedrich-Dittes-Straße in Leipzig.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used. The photo is cropped at the top a bit tight.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

… and very dark in the front. Both could be improved. -- Spurzem (talk) 08:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Thank you.  Done. --August Geyler (talk) 10:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:26, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Bahnbau in Leipzig nach Monat

Tach August, auf diese Weise werden mehrere Fliegen mit einer Klappe geschlagen, die Monatskategorien von Leipzig, die construction-Kategorien und die rail transport-Kategorien. Ich hoffe, dass die Bahn-Fotografen nicht nur in Leipzig dies wertschätzen und in Zukunft auf diese Weise ihre Bilder verkategorisieren. Gruss --anro (talk) 16:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Oh das klingt gut. Aber auf welcher Seite. Du meinst eine neue Kategorie, ja? Kannst Du mir die Syntax und die Einsortierlogik dazu bitte noch mal etwas genauer erklären? Augustgeyler (talk) 16:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Hast Du Zeit für ne kurze Antwort? August Geyler (talk) 02:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
former machine factory Karl Krause with company grounds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best is scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 02:38, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Front view of Robur LO 2002-based vehicles on rail wheels.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment File:03 613 LO-Skl.jpg seems most useful to me because we can see more parts of the truck. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment It would be acceptable if you changed the scope to "Front view of ..." --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment OK, I will nominate File:03 613 LO-Skl.jpg later, when this one here might be declined. --Augustgeyler (talk) 11:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Both images can be VI if they have different scopes. -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 14:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment OK, so I changed the scope of this image as suggested by Palauenc05. --August Geyler (talk) 15:24, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & best in scope. -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 07:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railwaybridge Lieselotte-Herrmann-Str. in Leipzig under reconstruction.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment As the best picture of the complete building, I would wish it without the barrier. The scope of the presented photo should be changed, for example "Barrier at the Railwaybridge …" -- Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|
•  Thank you.  Done As this building is under reconstruction I changed the scope as suggested. --August Geyler (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

talk]]) 20:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support. Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 08:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Pfarrhaus von Trages.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberer Teil des Mehrfamilienhauses Steinberger Straße 9 in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The night rainbow 06:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Multiple dwelling Zweinaundorfer Straße with protective net.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I would not always praise myself, but leave it to others to judge whether it is the best image. In the rest I see a picture of a protective net, less of a building or multiple dwelling. Perhaps you should modify the scope here too. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 13:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Done I did not want praise anything. I only wanted to describe the reason for nominating this.  Thank you. I changed the scope as mentioned. --August Geyler (talk) 15:00, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 20:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Tagooty (talk) 03:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herrnhuter Straße 2.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 03:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I fixed the scope. "Category" should not be visible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphere Radio Studiocontainer in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery chapel at Ostfriedhof (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eiszapfen in der Zweinaundorfer Straße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:16, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Maschinenfrabrik Karl-Krause im Schnee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:16, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TWSBI Eco Füllhalter weiß B mit Kappe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remains of the entrance area of the railway siding coming from Eilenburger Bahnhof connecting to the former bookbindery machine factory "Karl Krause" in Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question The scope is of the building that is partly cropped out, right? Is there no way to get all or more of the facade in a photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment No, the scope is not about that building. It is about that rails in that area which were the former starting point of a railway siding connecting large company grounds (outside this image) to the railway network. --August Geyler (talk) 13:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Question Could you more clearly indicate that in your scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:39, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Gave my best… --August Geyler (talk) 14:42, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks. Useful. By the way, I realize now that part of the problem was that "siding" by itself can refer to what's put on the side of a building (aluminum siding, etc.), and I hadn't been familiar with the term "railway siding." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former rectory in Trages (near Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment If this is a listed building, some reference would be useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Thank you. I just added the listed number for that cultural heritage monument to the image as well as link to the corresponding list here at the nomination. --August Geyler (talk) 22:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope. I felt like the first letter should be capitalized. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zug der S-Bahn Mitteldeutschland in Baustelle des Haltepunktes Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some minor CAs, but IMHO OK for QI. --C messier 18:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhofskapelle des Leipziger Ostfriedhofs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spot to remove. --Steindy 13:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)  Done  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 16:08, 5 December 2021 (UTC)  Support Okay now. --Steindy 12:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reflecta CS slide frames.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Why should your image be better than thisj? -- Spurzem (talk) 13:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Due to it's white background it can much better be integrated into wikidata and templates / symbols --August Geyler (talk) 23:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Support. O. K. Under this view perhaps more useful than the images with blue background. -- Spurzem (talk) 21:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reflecta CS - Diarahmen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stacked photos should be sharp from front to end. --Ermell 09:43, 12 December 2021 (UTC)  Comment It is the maximum I could get out of it. Thought the very far unsharp end gives some depth. --Augustgeyler 23:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TWSBI Eco Füllhalter Orange M mit Kappe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TWSBI Eco Füllhalter Orange M.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TWSBI Eco Füllhalter weiß ohne Kappe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf railway station – just before reconstruction in 2020.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Used and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 17:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zerlegung einer ausgebauten Stahlnietenbrücke in Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf (Dia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)