User talk:Augustgeyler/Archive 2020

Talk

Calm down

Hi, you are exploding the Consensual Review section of QIC, with at least 30 entries there motivated by you that will end up in most cases, if not 100%, in the opposite direction of your vote. Are you aware of there ressources needed for that (manual effort to prepare each voting and the reviews of so many people)? I don't remember any user having done something like this before. Please, shift down at least 2 gears, and observe first how a FEW of your reviews and candidates evolve before you review 100 images and collapse our process. Thank you. --Poco a poco (talk) 22:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

@Poco a poco: I tried to follow the guidelines. I am wondering that having someone new is such a big deal for the process. Imagine there would be many more voters, lets say 50 per day: Wouldn't that be wonderful and democratic. But I think you would mind that because your well-ordered process might „collapse“. You are looking for people having your opinion to be part of the review process? Can't believe that. --Augustgeyler (talk) 06:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I try it in a different way. You obviously don't have the experience to know what is a QI and what isn't. I know the guidelines by heart and you are not following them by any means, so don't affirm that you take the book in the hand, apply the rules and I'm upset about that. That's bullshit. You are declining images that are clear QIs, and I would even spend time to prove it to you, but PLEASE, focus on a few and don't review so many after you see that we have to spend a lot of time to reverse your wrong assessments. Poco a poco (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Dem kann ich mich nur anschließen. Auch ich empfinde die allermeisten von Augustgeylers Bewertungen als Störung. Bilder zum Beispiel abzuwerten, weil in einem Wald der Horizont nicht zu sehen ist oder hinter einem Denkmal ein Baum steht, ist Unsinn oder Böswilligkeit. Das hat nichts mehr damit zu tun, dass die Geschmäcker verschieden sind. Im Übrigen verstehe ich nicht, was es heißt, dass einem Foto die „dynamic range“ fehlt. Bitte nichts für ungut, dass ich das so klar sage. Gruß -- Spurzem (talk) 12:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Spurzem: Unter "low dynamic range" meint er wohl, dass es keine sehr helle oder dunkle Töne gibt, sprich, dass man die Schatten zu sehr aufgehellt hat und die helle Stelle zu sehr abgedunkelt hat, was ich aber bei meinen Bildern nicht bestätigen kann. Poco a poco (talk) 15:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

@Poco a poco: Danke. Da erinnere ich mich, dass er ein Foto von einem Portal mit der Begründung ablehnte, dass es keine Schatten hatte. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 20:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok, da Ihr jetzt schon in der dritten Person von mir redet, meldet ER sich jetzt noch mal: Ich vermisste einen großen Dynamikumfang (also Differenz zwischen helstem und dunkelstem Punkt), wenn ein Bild ihn scheinbar in natura hatte, dann aber sehr helle Schatten aufwies. Wenn ein Baum im Hintergrund eines Motives lag, und im Vordergrund nur Wiese war, dann übte ich Kritik. Ich liege vielleicht falsch. Vielleicht liegt mal jemand anderes nicht richtig. Manchmal gibt es kein Richtig und Falsch sondern es zählt die Abwägung von Einschätzungen. Darum gibt es ja diesen offenen Reviewprozess. Jetzt lerne ich, dass ich störe. Ich darf wohl dennoch erwarten, dass Ihr mein Zutun entweder aushaltet oder mir erklärt, wo ich den Quidlines tatsächlich im Einzelnen zu Wider handle. Bitte unterlasst Unterstellungen wie etwa Böswilligkeit! Auch die pauschale Aussage, ich hätte keine Ahnung von den Quidelines finde ich unangemessen und inhaltlich falsch. In den Quidlines steht nicht, dass man erst von Euch geadelt werden oder eine Quidline-Schulung besuchen muss, oder einen über die Stimmberechtigung hinaus erforderlichen Rang erreichen soll. Wenn Ihr das wünscht, dann ändert doch bitte diese Richtlinien, um „falsche“ Meinungen zur Verschlankung Eures demokratischen Prozesses fernzuhalten. Ich habe mich mit Zeit und Interesse in diesen Prozess gegeben und ernte Euer negatives Feedback. Weil ich nur bedingt Lust habe, mich dem dauerhaft auszusetzen, biete ich Euch sehr gern an, mich aus der Mitwirkung vorrübergehend zurückzuziehen, wenn Ihr tatsächlich darauf besteht.--Augustgeyler (talk) 19:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Nummernschilder verpixeln

Hallo Augustgeyler, bei den Quality imgaes candidates hattest du nachgefragt, ob es sinnvoll ist, Autokennzeichen unleserlich zu machen. Zumindest im deutschsprachigen Raum ist das nicht nötig. Siehe dazu de:Hilfe:Bilder/Autonummern verpixeln und speziell auch die zugehörige Diskussionsseite. --37.24.79.154 08:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Danke Dir!--Augustgeyler (talk) 19:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Ostplatz/Oststraße

Das scheint mir aber verkehrt herum zu sein. Ostplatz und die Straßen sind eher auf der gleichen Ebene und nicht alles am Ostplatz ist auch in/an der Oststraße. --Don-kun (talk) 06:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@Don-kun: Nun ja, das ist ja das Praktische an Kategorien: Sie können wiederum gleichzeitig Subkategorien von mehreren anderen Oberkategorien sein. Also in diesem Fall als Bsp: Ein Foto von einem Haus am Ostplatz darf nur in eine Subkategorie aus dem selben Strang und kommt deshalb, weil es hauptsächlich Gebäude und Flächen an eben jenem Platz zeigt, in die Subkategorie Ostplatz (Leipzig). Diese Kategorie selber ist nun gleichzeitig Subkategorie mehrerer anderer Straßenkategorien. So gehört unser Ostplatz nun sowohl zur Kategorie Prager Straße (Leipzig), zur KAtegorie Johannisallee (Leipzig) und zur Kategorie Oststraße (Leipzig), sowie zu weiteren stadtbezogenen Kategorien. In jeder diese Kategorien taucht dann ganz oben die Subkategorie Ostplatz (Leipzig) auf. Unser Beispielfoto, wird nun also sehr viel öfter gefunden und ist selbst regelkonform nur einmal in einer Hauptkategorie vorhanden. --Augustgeyler (talk) 13:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Es wird vor allem sehr oft gefunden, obwohl es überhaupt nicht gesucht wird: Wenn man nach Johannisallee oder Prager Straße sucht, obwohl die Bilder garnicht von den beiden Straßen sind. Und das ist überhaupt nicht praktisch. --Don-kun (talk) 10:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Na darum tauchen sie dort ja auch nicht in der Direktansicht sondern als Subkategorie auf. Da sucht man also nach Johannisalle und erfährt, dass es auch eine ganze Gruppe von Bildern zum Ostplatz gibt. Die schaut man aber nur an, wenn man das sehen möchte. Außerdem soll das Suchen ja eh auf Stuctured Data verlagert werden. Es ist also sehr sinnvoller, die diese Infos bei existierenden Bildern zu ergänzen. --Augustgeyler (talk) 13:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Archived notifications

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf vor dem Umbau 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hp Leipzig-Anger-Crottendorf mit einfahrender S-Bahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkstätte polnischer Soldaten im Zweiten Weltkrieg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the green fringes at the branches. --Ermell 20:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)  Done repaired artifacts --Augustgeyler 23:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkort der Opfer der Euthanasie in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gräberfeld der 766 Kriegstoten verschiedener Nationen (Ostfriedhof Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erweiterte Gedenkstätte der ital. Soldaten im Zweiten Weltkrieg (Ostfriedhof Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)  Comment} The blurring looks unnatural and annoying. Also, the top and bottom of the picture is cropped too tight. For me it wouldn't be QI. -- Spurzem 15:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zweinaundorfer Straße mit Fernwärmeleitung und Bahnbaustelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle am Haltepunkt Leipzig-Anger-Crottendorf-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --Isiwal 21:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostfriedhof Gedenkstaette Polnische-Opfer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The totally blurred parts of the picture on the left and right bother me a lot. -- Spurzem 13:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC) I am sorry this is bothering you. I intended this composition to show the trees sorrounding the place on which the monument is placed on. --Augustgeyler 09:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC) I agree with User:Spurzem that the blurred left and right don't convey the intent. Could try cropping them out. --Tagooty 15:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)  Done I tried cropping. --Augustgeyler 18:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 14:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natursteinmauerwerk an einem Widerlager nummeriert für Wiedereinbau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and detail. -- Crep171166 09:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle am Haltepunkt Leipzig-Anger-Crottendorf-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig Herrnhuterstrasse-2-landscape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig Mierendorffstraße-58 landscape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Some minor traces of CAs. --Aristeas 09:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wuppertaler Schwebebahn – Station Landgericht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 00:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkstätte der ital. Soldaten im Zweiten Weltkrieg (Ostfriedhof Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Sellerhäuser Straße 7 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Sellerhäuser Straße 8 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandmalerei im Treppenhaus des Mehrfamilienhauses Mierendorffstraße 60 – 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 16:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandmalerei im Treppenhaus des Mehrfamilienhauses Mierendorffstraße 60 – 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 16:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Mierendorffstraße 53 (Leipzig) – Fenster 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 22:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Mierendorffstraße 53 (Leipzig) – Fenster 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 22:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Herrnhuter Straße 1 (Leipzig) – Fenster mit historischem Rolladen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Mierendorffstraße 65 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehem. Maschinenfabrik Karl-Krause im Herbst 2020 – Ostteil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vine leaf in the afternoon sun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehem. Maschinenfabrik Karl-Krause im Herbst 2020 – mit gesamten Betriebsgelände.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC) Could you please take a look at the lower left cloud (cloning artefacts?) --Virtual-Pano 14:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)  Comment There was no edit to the sky. All clouds are untouched. The only edit which might have effected the sky was a slight colour grading to the hole image.--Augustgeyler 14:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for clarifying--Virtual-Pano 16:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemaliger Haltepunkt Anger-Crottendorf im Herbst 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 13:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemaliges Anschlussgleis der Maschinenfabrik Karl-Krause in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentThis well composed and focused frame would surely benefit by adjusting the left half of the sky as this looks overexposed --Virtual-Pano 13:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)  Done I made an exposure corretion at the sky. --Augustgeyler 14:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)  Support well composed and a better structured sky --Virtual-Pano 17:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahndamm des Leipziger Güterrings in Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf mit neuer Böschung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zweinaundorfer Straße mit Mehrfamilienhaus Nr. 61 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composure, but several dust specks in the sky (above the scaffolding and the yellow house) --Virtual-Pano 00:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Thank you! Hope I did remove it properly. --Augustgeyler 01:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Yes you did - they are spotless now --Virtual-Pano 18:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehem. Maschinenfabrik Karl-Krause im Herbst 2020 – Mittelteil (nah).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think sharpness is acceptable, composition is good, but there are CAs at the right. Please fix the CAs. --XRay 05:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Thank you – removed all CAs --Augustgeyler 06:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC) Thank you. The place looks like a good (lost) place to take photographs. --XRay 13:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehem. Maschinenfabrik Karl-Krause im Herbst 2020 – Mittelteil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs at the right tower. Sharpness could be better. --Ermell 09:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)  Done removed CAs, slightly applied sharpening. – Thank you! --Augustgeyler 11:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC) ok but the dust spots in the sky should be removed as well. --Ermell 22:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Thank you. --Augustgeyler 12:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Thank you. --Ermell 09:13, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neo-Barock-Fassade Mehrfamilienhaus – Sellerhäuser Straße 7 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality, the colour saturation seems a bit low (see flowers and window decoration) --Virtual-Pano 09:24, 19 October 2020 (UTC) I think thats due to lighting conditions. The façade is looking like in real world. I tried to increase saturation, but than the façade started looking wrong. --Augustgeyler 11:23, 19 October 2020 (UTC) Comment Imo perspective must be corrected, it's leaning more on the right side. I have some doubts about the classification as neobaroque, imo it's more neorenaissance, but I'm not an art historian ;-) --Moroder 05:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Comment I checked the perspective aggain. The centre lines of the building are vertical. The decribed different leaning on both ends comes from the fact, that the building lest side is longer than the right one. The neo-baroque classification comes form the official authorities who discribed the front as cultural heritage monument with neo baroque elements. --Augustgeyler 09:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC) Comment I doon't want to oppose the "authorities" ;-) but I guess that you could easily correct all vertical lines --Moroder 08:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC) :-) Yes I could apply more vertical correction. But I am not willing, because I think that would be too much and would give an unnatural look. So if you don't agree you might have to oppose. --Augustgeyler 11:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 08:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filiale des Konsum Leipzig eG am Trinitatisplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 15:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Herrnhuter Straße 5 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 23:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Ihmelstraße 15 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good one. -- Ikan Kekek 02:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Wichernstraße 30 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Theodor-Neuebauer-Straße 19a (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 19:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Theodor-Neubauer-Straße 3 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 19:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Herrnhuter Straße 3 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction and IMHO, it is a bit underexposed. --C messier 18:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC) Perspective is corrected. The shot was taken at sunset. So it is not underexposed. --Augustgeyler 20:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC) The walls are leaning in from both sides and it can be brightened a bit (about +0.3EV). --C messier 21:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC) Ok Thank you for reviewing. You convinced me. I raised exposue by 0.26 EV and increased perspective correction. --Augustgeyler 00:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Herbartstraße 4 (Leipzig) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eckhaus an der Kreuzung Herbartstraße - Mierendorffstraße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:41, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Zweinaundorfer Straße 61 – Detail des Ladenanbaus (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Zweinaundorfer Straße 61 – Detail des Hauseinganges (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Zweinaundorfer Straße 61 – Detail des rechten Ladenlokals (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf – Rohbau Fußgängerunterführung im Süden mit Fernwärmeleitung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drei Baukräne an der Bahnbaustelle Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Herbartstraße 2 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Zweinaundorfer Straße 61 – Detail eines Fensers (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mierendorfstraße am Abzweig Anger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle Haltepunkt Anger-Crottendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:42, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausfahrt S3 aus dem Haltepunkt Anger-Crottendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:51, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alter Fahrleitungsmast am Haltepunkt Leipzig-Anger-Crottendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)