User talk:Armbrust/Archive 1

Archive 1 | Archive 2 →

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Armbrust!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

CC license?

Resolved

Dear Armbrust, where can I find the CC license tag or notice for http://spiralperiodictable.com/ ? I can not find it. --ALE! ¿…? 18:37, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Well than you don't search good enough. Under the picture is the following text: "Spiral Periodic Table by Robert W Harrison is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License". Armbrust (talk) 18:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! --ALE! ¿…? 08:02, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Image:Evanna Lynch acrylic ink.jpg and Image:Evanna Lynch acrylic ink 2.jpg categories

Resolved

Please be more careful in categorizing your images, as Category:Luna refers to a place in Spain, not the character w:Luna Lovegood. Also, I'm bit puzzled why you uploaded those images, as I can't exactly see what encyclopedic purpose they serve. Thanks for your attention and possible response. JesseW (talk) 04:14, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Well they were requested at WP:FFU and as the license was compatible, I didn't see any rationale to decline the request. As for the categories, at that time I didn't have many time to check them, because someone requested the upload of 58 pictures in the same section. (BTW, only registered to TUSC account because of this section.) Armbrust (talk) 09:40, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Need some help

Resolved

Could you please teach me how to make football lineups the way you do, please? Strawberry on Vanilla (talk) 15:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Well I'm not sure I can, but I will try. Firstly as I'm not very active on Commons could we continue this discussion on en Wikipedia? Armbrust (talk) 16:38, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

File:URU-PAR-2011-07-24.svg

Resolved

Hey,

There is an error in the line-up image you created. On the Uruguay side, Álvaro Pereira played as the LM, not Cristian Rodríguez. When you do correct it, make sure to have him as "Á. Pereira", and Maxi (RB) as "M. Pereira". Thanks. Digirami (talk) 18:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Corrected "Rodríguez" to "Pereira", because no lineup for this tournament uses the "Á. Pereira" or "M. Pereira". Armbrust (talk) 06:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Picture - Jonathan_Huberdeau_WJC12_press_conference.jpg

Resolved

Hello, I saw that you recently reviewed a photo that is now on Huberdeau's wiki. However, I'm 95% sure that is not Jonathan Huberdeau in the picture in question, but rather Nathan Beaulieu. Here is another picture of Beaulieu for comparison, while this is Huberdeau. Also, Nathan_Beaulieu_WJC12_press_conference.jpg is another photo that I'm not sure actually features him. Maybe that is actually Ryan Murray? Ho-ju-96 (talk) 10:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but I absolutely don't know, who is on the picture. I just reviewed, that the file is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic at FlickR. And even if you were right, that the files name is wrong, I can't help you, as I'm not a filemover on Commons. Armbrust (talk) 10:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

A recent deletion

Resolved

Could you please reply to User:Slowking4's recent comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Occidental Avenue South (Seattle, Washington).jpg? It seems it has reached the point where he will take it personally if he hears further from me on the matter. - Jmabel ! talk 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

 Already done in January. Armbrust (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

File:FEDERER Roger-24x30-1998.jpg

Resolved

Hello, I am afraid you were mistaken with this file. As clearly stated on User:Studio Harcourt, this account is used by the Studio Hacourt, and this was verifed through OTRS. Please be more careful with your tagging. Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Well that wasn't clear from the file description page. Will more cautious next time. Armbrust (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Buryat anthem in Russian

Resolved

It seems that File:Anthem of Buryatia Russian version.ogg is likely duplicate of File:Anthem of Buryatia.ogg. File:Anthem of Buryatia Russian version.ogg should be in Russian, not Buryat. Could you visit http://fivemusic.ru/song/Гимн+Бурятия and look for Гимн Республики Бурятия - на русском языке (the song in Russian, not Buryat [which the Buryat version titles as Дугаржап Дашиев - "Гимн Бурятии" (на бурятском)]) to replace File:Anthem of Buryatia Russian version.ogg. Thanks. --Apsuu8952 (talk) 07:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done Armbrust (talk) 11:35, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Sakha anthem

Resolved

Hello! Could you visit http://mp3-music.su/?q=%C3%E8%EC%ED+%D1%E0%F5%E0 and look for "Гимн - Саха" [3:29 мин] (Hymn of Sakha State chorus (w/ full lyrics))? The song currently used as the anthem of the Sakha Republic. {{PD-RU-exempt}} (Please place under File:Anthem of the Sakha Republic.ogg) --Apsuu8952 (talk) 13:17, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done Armbrust (talk) 15:28, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Belgian 100 francs

Resolved

Hi Armbrust, would you upload the first version of this file again with the correct name so I can add it to the Belgian franc article? Thnx. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 04:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC).

Hi again, I found it back in the meantime, sorry for the inconvenience, you can delete my question. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 05:34, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

One of your uploaded images was modified to not match title

Resolved

An image you uploaded File:ICarly actors at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst 2.jpg was replaced with a cropped version that only shows one of the actors and makes the file description and title incorrect. Just wanted to make sure you were aware and were OK with the modification. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Somebody already restored the original image. Nothing for me to do. Armbrust (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the upload

Resolved

Hi Armbrust. Just wanted to thank you for the upload. Looks like you're holding down w:en:WP:FFU all by yourself. I'm sure everybody you're helping is very appreciative. I know I am. Thanks again. 64.40.54.112 14:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the image-reviewer

Resolved

Thanks for the information. Best regards, --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 08:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Was my pleasure to grant you the permission. Armbrust (talk) 19:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

License reviewer

Resolved

Thank you Armbrust for granting my request, I'll try and not let you down. Thanks for the user scripts, if there's anything I can help with specifically please do not hesitate to ask. Cheers. Mlpearc (powwow) 08:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

It was my pleasure to grant you the right. Armbrust (talk) 11:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Resolved

Thanks for the reviewer rights! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:35, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Is there some code or something by which the files i review would be added in my watchlist as and when i review? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't know from the existence of such a code. Armbrust (talk) 08:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

No problem. Got it answered. Its simpler than i thought. Use Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-watchlist and select Add pages and files I edit to my watchlist. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 20:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Well I thought about that too, but it wasn't exactly what you wanted. Armbrust (talk) 06:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Naah! That's what i wanted. Was complicating it unnecessarily. Sorry to bother. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

No problem. BTW Thanks for the cupcake (Forgot to say until now.) Armbrust (talk) 17:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

File:A K Hangal at 14th Hira Manik Awards.jpg

Resolved

The above file was reviewed as coming from BollywoodHungama, however, there are concerns whether this file was originally from them in the first place. IT appeared in other media as well [1] Lihaas (talk) 03:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

They are just similar, and not the same image. The one on BollywoodHungama contains details, which are missing from the other picture. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 05:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Changing licenses

Resolved

Hi, Armbrust. First of all: thank you for all your efforts in License Reviewing! I saw you changed license here, which in effect turns the latest version into the oldest version of the cc-by-sa. I think it is good policy to take the current=latest version of a given license when no version number is given. Perhaps we should stick to that. Thank you. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 08:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Okay, but what if a new version of Creative Commons comes out? Should the license than changed to CC-BY-SA-4.0 for example? User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 08:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I don't think that should - in fact the precise choice of license stays unclear. But replacing it by default to -1.0 doesn't seem very accurat either. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 11:38, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Image of Jonthan Goforth and his wife

Resolved

Hello, good afternoon.

Sorry, but a never can upload any archive here, because I cant understand how I can do it. I heve sended a e-mail to de author of the image, and he answer my ask. He gave me the authotization to published it. What a I need to do to have your permission? Please help us. The image is authorized. Look his response:

Hi, you are free to use any materials in wikipedia. Please go ahead.

-- Greg Gordon

---

http://www.sermonindex.net

"Only one life, ’twill soon be past, Only what’s done for Christ will last."

-C.T. Studd (1860-1931) Data 4 de setembro de 2012(2012-09-04), 14:02:48 Fonte http://www.sermonindex.net/modules/myalbum/photo.php?lid=370 Autor Greg Gordon

Didakê (talk) 17:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

If the copyright holder gave Commons permission for the image, than they should follow the instructions described at COM:CONSENT. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 17:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Panoramio

Resolved

Hi! Please, tell me, how can i download original size foto from Panoramio?— Redboston 10:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

You click on the image you want to download, then you reach a new page. There are icons. Click on the second one from right (if you hover over it, than is shows "View the original image") and you reach the original size of the image. For example in the case of this file, you reach this screen first and this file. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 10:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Oh, it's so easy! Thanks very much.— Redboston 16:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Reason For Marking The Co-operative Electrical logo.jpg a copyvio

Resolved

I just wanted to explain to you why I marked these images The Co-operative Bank logo.jpg, and The Co-operative Electrical logo.jpg as possible copyvios is because even though on their Flickr page of the Logos, it said it was marked under CC-BY 2.0. But on the actual company website it said everything is Copyrighted see their website at the footer of the page, and also on the company's disclaimer for the website. As such I marked the logo's of The Co-operative Inc. that User:Stevo1000 uploaded for to be on the safe side, also I used in my best judgment to mark it as a Copyvio. Also I believe that if an image is copyrighted by their company or the company says on their website that All Rights Reserved, but its listed on their Flickr Photostream as CC-BY or other related licenses. That the copyright takes precedence unless we get the actual company to release it under CC-BY or other related licenses. Or just contact them to confirm, that they intened to publish it on their Flickr stream or other Photo hosting sites, under the licences listed there. I hope you understand why I did that. Because of the conflicting licenses stated on their website and disclaimer against the one on the Flickr Photostream. Also I just noticed on this on one of their pages mentioning their Copyright use of the Logos here. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 23:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

No problem. I stated in my edit summary why I think it's not a copyright violation. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 09:56, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Waarneming.nlUser

Resolved

Thank you. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 15:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

My pleasure. Hoped it would be useful. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 18:58, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

License review

Resolved

Could you please check the following file File:Strelok-ak-74.jpg? Just to be sured that I assume correctly this falls under free license by it's author at the source website ... Best regards --RussianTrooper (talk) 21:10, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 09:53, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Darwin's_Soldiers_image.png

Resolved

I obtained permission from every possible relevant person in this publically available thread, which is linked to in the image description. I even spoke with a respected image-focused admin on Wikipedia and he confirmed that he thinks I gave enough information. Please inform me what more permission I would have to obtain. A forum admin, the game-master of the role-play, and all three quoted players gave their complete permission for the uploader (me) to use the image under the license specified by the uploader. Ye Olde Luke (talk) 09:48, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

My mistake.  Fixed User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 10:02, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Adminship

Resolved

Extended content

Support = 9;  Oppose = 5;  Neutral = 7 - 43% Result. Unsuccessful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC) Armbrust Vote Armbrust (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth) Scheduled to end: 08:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC) Hello everyone. For my 6th nom, I want to introduce a sensible candidate for adminship, Armbrust. He has been an user on Commons since May 2009 and had over 4500 edits which greatly involves in license reviewing and copyvio hunting. He is also a great user at enwiki with 140,242 edits. I think the rights could be useful to Armbrust for deleting obvious copyright violations and unfree Flickr files while license-reviewing. He has accepted my proposal (see here). Thank you Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Thank you, Morning Sunshine. I gladly accept the nomination. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 08:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Votes  Support as nom--Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 09:24, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Reaffirming my vote in light of opposes, many of which are clearly worthless drive-by-votes. I'm not bothered by his en.wp activity; look and see that he's done nothing but good on Commons. -FASTILY (TALK) 21:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)  Support Good user. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:21, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Support MorganKevinJ(talk) 13:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Neutral Experienced user, but the en.wiki blocks leave me unsure of how this user would deal with disputes and disagreements here. INeverCry 17:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Weak support. I wasn't aware of the long block log on en-wiki, but I trust him here and his answer reassures me enough. Trijnsteltalk 19:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Support why not? --Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 20:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Neutral. Cannot oppose due to excellent contributions to Commons. Cannot support due to ownership attitudes, strongly expressed by the candidate in English Wikipedia. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:15, 13 October 2012 (UTC)  Neutral. Armbrust (whose name I almost always misspell by swapping the r and the u) does a lot of good work, but has a few blocks for edit warring. I'm not sure about his temperament, but I'm willing to give him the chance. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC) Switched from weak support to neutral, at least until 9of99's question is answered. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:40, 14 October 2012 (UTC)  Neutral. I'm not inclined to oppose, but the enwiki block log is concerning—not because of the blocks themselves, but because the disputes that led to them show that Armbrust doesn't always handle disagreements well. However, he has done a tremendous amount of good work both here and on enwiki, and he shouldn't be judged purely on that block log. I would have liked to have seen a slightly longer answer to my question, so I'd be interested to see the answer to 99of9's, which may swing my vote one way or t'other. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:07, 15 October 2012 (UTC)  Support, per Morning Sunshine (talk · contribs). Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 18:59, 15 October 2012 (UTC)  Weak support. I trust his experience in the Commons and per Trijnstel (although the blocks on en-wiki makes me a little worried).Érico Wouters msg 12:08, 16 October 2012 (UTC)  Neutral I've wavered between this and a weak oppose. For me there are a few aspects making me feel slightly uneasy. If this application is successful, I hope you will learn a lot from our critical comments. Although you have a reasonable eye for spotting copyvios and problems, for an admin candidate whose main uploads are from third party sources, I would have expected it to be more highly attuned. Even when I specifically asked about some of your problematic uploads, the answers weren't ideal (#1 missed that it was a copyvio, and didn't even go for contacting the "author" or COM:PRP. #2 didn't seem to fully appreciate the legal requirement of attribution). The answer about edit warring policy was very brief, took days and a talk page reminder (despite editing here and on en-wiki in the meantime), and boils down to an assumption rather than precedent or policy. In fact, we have no 3RR, just a prohibition against edit warring, so things are different to en-wiki, and a crucial part of our blocking policy is warnings before the escalating blocks you suggest. Maybe that's what you intended but were unable to convey it with your short answer - so maybe your communication style needs to be improved (also crucial for an admin). On the other hand, what I've seen of the bulk of your work, including license reviewing and tagging, looks good - and this is also quite similar to a lot of deletion work. In the end what made me stay neutral rather than oppose is that I haven't seen any indications on commons of bad faith or a problematic attitude. --99of9 (talk) 00:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)  Oppose those blocks are numerous and spread over years. And the last one is from August, so temperament is in question here. Hekerui (talk) 08:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)  Oppose That's too many blocks for a sysop candidate. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC)  Support I'm a little bothered by the en.wikipedia blocks, though his behavior seems to be better here at Commons. I also share 99of9's concerns in general. But I'm supporting per 99of9's second-to-last sentence - "the bulk of your work ... looks good" and per Tjinstel. Have a shot at it. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 13:17, 20 October 2012 (UTC)  Oppose too my blocks for a sysop candidate. Udufruduhu (talk) 16:52, 20 October 2012 (UTC)  Oppose There's some very solid support above from very solid citizens, so I don't like opposing this, but given the block log -- 23 reverts on the same file in an hour and a half on August 14, I don't see how Armbrust can be an Admin here. We need people who can deal constructively with problems, whatever the facts of the case. Sure, we have some very difficult editors to deal with, but an Admin's job is to make things work more smoothly, not simply pound away at problems over and over. Enlisting help, or simply leaving it for a day after the first two problems, would have been better solutions. Perhaps he should come back in six months, with a clean record both there and here, and a bit more time spent here on DRs and other relevant work. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:18, 21 October 2012 (UTC)  Neutral - reading all this - its hard to support - en behaviour and attitude usually does flow over to here, regardless of what anyone says... vice versa operates too SatuSuro (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2012 (UTC)  Oppose per a couple of the above. --Herby talk thyme 15:17, 23 October 2012 (UTC)  Neutral Considering the blocks on en.wikipedia I'm tending to oppose this request, but hence his block log on commons is clean I'm neutral. Give it some time and file for another RfA in a year or so.--FAEP (talk) 23:15, 23 October 2012 (UTC) Comments What about adding a babel box? --Leyo 09:36, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Done User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 09:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Question How would you respond if File:Giantess_collage.jpg was nominated for deletion with the rationale "I doubt the Flickr user took both photos". --99of9 (talk) 11:31, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Well this isn't easy to answer, as the image can't be find any more on Flickr. The image is a digital collage of two photos, one about the women and one about the background. I have made a little search about the background, and found that the The Elmer and Mamdouha Bobst Hospital of The Animal Medical Center is in New York, there. After this I think, that the background could be made from the Ed Koch Queensboro Bridge. I also see no reason, why the FlickR user couldn't make the photo about the women. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 12:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC) So what would you do? --99of9 (talk) 13:48, 10 October 2012 (UTC) I would !vote keep in the DR with the above rationale. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 13:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Have you read the image caption at en:WP? Would that influence your opinion? Andy Dingley (talk) 14:35, 10 October 2012 (UTC) No, I have not seen, that the model on the image is Katie Price. In that case this portion of the photo, maybe isn't the creation of the Flickr user. However just the fact, that the person is famous, doesn't make it automatically impossible to make a photo about her. Therefore I would not participate in the DR. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 15:14, 10 October 2012 (UTC) I have deleted this image as an obvious copyvio of this -- Source: Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images Europe. russavia (talk) 18:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)  Question How would you respond if a comment was posted to your talk page regarding File:In ut blog lolcat.jpg, reading "The Flickr user is not the photographer" --99of9 (talk) 11:38, 10 October 2012 (UTC) I would say, he is right. The original image comes from there and is licensed currently under {{Cc-by-2.0}}. An other user made a derivative work from this file and the description contains the needed attribution to the original file. The second user change the display of the laptop and put the "i'm in ur blog makin ur rss" text on the image. I don't see any problem with it, but amended the description page. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 12:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Yes, there was no problem with what either Flickr user did. The main problem was that we/Commons/you were breaking the attribution requirement of the original photographer by not attributing it to him. But your diff is good, and the image is now safe to be hosted. --99of9 (talk) 13:48, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Question How would you respond if File:Lolcoati.jpg was nominated for deletion with the rationale "obviously flickrwashed". --99of9 (talk) 11:50, 10 October 2012 (UTC) I would say, they are right. Original photo is copyrighted, therefore I have marked it as copyright violation. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 13:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Good. I realize you uploaded this quite a long time ago, so I'm sure you're more discerning now that you have more experience. An additional possibility is to add the Flickr user to our "bad list". --99of9 (talk) 13:48, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Yes, adding the user to the "bad list" is also an option, however it shouldn't be done because of only one image. (Which is btw their first upload to Flickr.) User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 13:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Please enable receiving e-mails from other users in Special:Preferences. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Done User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 15:14, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Question You have quite a considerable block log on enwiki, including several recent blocks for edit-warring, so do you think you act differently on Commons, and if so should we be concerned that your conduct on Commons might resemble you conduct on enwiki if you become an administrator? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:16, 10 October 2012 (UTC) I know, that I can act differently on Commons. No, there should be no concern about this matter. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 17:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Question Given that most of your en-wiki blocks are from 3RR violations, what is your understanding of how edit warring is dealt with on Commons? --99of9 (talk) 21:39, 10 October 2012 (UTC) I assume edit-warring is dealt the same way on Commons as on en.Wikipedia too, with blocks of increasing duration. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 10:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)  Comment I think will be good idea to extend voting for a week. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 17 October 2012 (UTC) I support this. --99of9 (talk) 02:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Tell me whether you accept or not. Thanks--Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:13, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

I accept. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 17:08, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Hey, I have started your RfA. I think it would be better if you sign your acceptance there. Thanks--Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:39, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 08:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Photo Of Raj Singh Chaudhary From The Premiere of Antardwand.jpg

Resolved

Hi, why only file:Photo Of Raj Singh Chaudhary From The Premiere of Antardwand.jpg are unpassed license review? other files (uploaded by me) from the same sounce (http://www.bollywoodhungama.com) are passed successfully. Puramyun31 (talk) 16:39, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Because there are two posters in the background and Bollywood Hungama has no right to release them. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 17:22, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, so I cropped the image, removed prominent parts of two movie posters. is it OK? Puramyun31 (talk) 17:41, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

  Now this is also reviewed. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 18:16, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Question at your RFA

Resolved

Hi Armbrust. Just letting you know that I've asked another question at your RFA that you appear to have overlooked. --99of9 (talk) 10:45, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done Answered question there. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 11:51, 16 October 2012 (UTC)