User talk:Alchemist-hp/Archive/2016

The traditional greeting

	Dear friend
	Happy New Year and best wishes!! Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

@Christian Ferrer thanks a lot and a Happy New Year for you too. We "see" us at our FP-site --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:58, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insect flights in the night in front of a spotlight HP L7869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insect flights in the night in front of a spotlight HP L7872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weißrückengeier Gyps africanus HP L2043.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Bismuth crystals.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Of course ! The Alchemist is back ! But you should add "oxydated" in the description, because we have non-oxydated crystals too to compare with, and the scope is therefore too broad IMO. Please notice that you have to explain why geocode is irrelevant here, because geocoding is a mandatory in VIC, thanks--Jebulon (talk) 15:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

A geoteg for a movable and not stationary item isn't necessary. Bismuth has alwyas a thin layer of oxide, but only a certain thickness are colorful. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín de cactus 7049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frau Prof Dr Sabine Laschat HP 22727.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prof. Dr. Herbert Mayr HP 22835e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prof. Dr. Daniel B. Werz HP 22823e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prof. Dr. Dieter Jahn HP 22818e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora Tromsø Norway HP L8365.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora Tromsø Norway HP L8354.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora Tromsø Norway HP L8353.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora Tromsø Norway HP L8032e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steschke 19:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora Tromsø Norway HP L8400 e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lunar Rainbow at Victoria Falls HP L2778e2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frau Prof. Dr. Thisbe Lindhorst Dr. Felix-Raoul Fischer HP 22764.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Das Motiv hängt nach links und die Urkunde ist leicht überstrahlt. Außerdem würde ich das Bild enger zuschneiden. -- Spurzem 21:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC) Bild um 1,1° nach rechts gedreht. Engerer Zuschnitt? Nein, es soll gerade auch die Lacation zeigen! Urkunde überstrahlt, mag sein, aber bei solch dunklen Verhältnissen geht es nicht anders. --Alchemist-hp 21:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC) Für QI durchaus ausreichend. Bei Bildern, bei denen man nur ein Chance hat, ist der Maßstab ein anderer, als unter Laborbedingungen. --Steschke 21:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)